1
|
Kariyawasam DS, Scarfe J, Meagher C, Farrar MA, Bhattacharya K, Carter SM, Newson AJ, Otlowski M, Watson J, Millis N, Norris S. 'Integrating Ethics and Equity with Economics and Effectiveness for newborn screening in the genomic age: A qualitative study protocol of stakeholder perspectives. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299336. [PMID: 38527031 PMCID: PMC10962853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newborn bloodspot screening is a well-established population health initiative that detects serious, childhood-onset, treatable conditions to improve health outcomes. With genomic technologies advancing rapidly, many countries are actively discussing the introduction of genomic assays into newborn screening programs. While adding genomic testing to Australia's newborn screening program could improve outcomes for infants and families, it must be considered against potential harms, ethical, legal, equity and social implications, and economic and health system impacts. We must ask not only 'can' we use genomics to screen newborns?' but 'should we'?' and 'how much should health systems invest in genomic newborn screening?'. METHODS This study will use qualitative methods to explore understanding, priorities, concerns and expectations of genomic newborn screening among parents/carers, health professionals/scientists, and health policy makers across Australia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews will be held with 30-40 parents/carers recruited via hospital and community settings, 15-20 health professionals/scientists, and 10-15 health policy makers. Data will be analysed using inductive content analysis. The Sydney Children's Hospital Network Human Research Ethics Committee approved this study protocol [2023/ETH02371]. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research will guide study planning, conduct and reporting. DISCUSSION Few studies have engaged a diverse range of stakeholders to explore the implications of genomics in newborn screening in a culturally and genetically diverse population, nor in a health system underpinned by universal health care. As the first study within a multi-part research program, findings will be used to generate new knowledge on the risks and benefits and importance of ethical, legal, social and equity implications of genomic newborn screening from the perspective of key stakeholders. As such it will be the foundation on which child and family centered criteria can be developed to inform health technology assessments and drive efficient and effective policy decision-making on the implementation of genomics in newborn screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didu S. Kariyawasam
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne Scarfe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Menzies Centre for Health Policy & Economics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christian Meagher
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle A. Farrar
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kaustav Bhattacharya
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Genetic Metabolic Disorders Service, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Randwick and Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Genomics, Sydney University, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stacy M. Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ainsley J. Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jo Watson
- HTA Consumer Consultative Committee, Department of Health & Aged Care, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | - Sarah Norris
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Menzies Centre for Health Policy & Economics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Andreoli L, Peeters H, Van Steen K, Dierickx K. Taking the risk. A systematic review of ethical reasons and moral arguments in the clinical use of polygenic risk scores. Am J Med Genet A 2024:e63584. [PMID: 38450933 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Debates about the prospective clinical use of polygenic risk scores (PRS) have grown considerably in the last years. The potential benefits of PRS to improve patient care at individual and population levels have been extensively underlined. Nonetheless, the use of PRS in clinical contexts presents a number of unresolved ethical challenges and consequent normative gaps that hinder their optimal implementation. Here, we conducted a systematic review of reasons of the normative literature discussing ethical issues and moral arguments related to the use of PRS for the prevention and treatment of common complex diseases. In total, we have included and analyzed 34 records, spanning from 2013 to 2023. The findings have been organized in three major themes: in the first theme, we consider the potential harms of PRS to individuals and their kin. In the theme "Threats to health equity," we consider ethical concerns of social relevance, with a focus on justice issues. Finally, the theme "Towards best practices" collects a series of research priorities and provisional recommendations to be considered for an optimal clinical translation of PRS. We conclude that the use of PRS in clinical care reinvigorates old debates in matters of health justice; however, open questions, regarding best practices in clinical counseling, suggest that the ethical considerations applicable in monogenic settings will not be sufficient to face PRS emerging challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Andreoli
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Kris Dierickx
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Friedman JM, Bombard Y, Carleton B, Issa AM, Knoppers B, Plon SE, Rahimzadeh V, Relling MV, Williams MS, van Karnebeek C, Vears D, Cornel MC. Should secondary pharmacogenomic variants be actively screened and reported when diagnostic genome-wide sequencing is performed in a child? Genet Med 2024; 26:101033. [PMID: 38007624 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This white paper was prepared by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream's Pediatric Task Team to review and provide perspective with respect to ethical, legal, and social issues regarding the return of secondary pharmacogenomic variants in children who have a serious disease or developmental disorder and are undergoing exome or genome sequencing to identify a genetic cause of their condition. We discuss actively searching for and reporting pharmacogenetic/genomic variants in pediatric patients, different methods of returning secondary pharmacogenomic findings to the patient/parents and/or treating clinicians, maintaining these data in the patient's health record over time, decision supports to assist using pharmacogenetic results in future treatment decisions, and sharing information in public databases to improve the clinical interpretation of pharmacogenetic variants identified in other children. We conclude by presenting a series of points to consider for clinicians and policymakers regarding whether, and under what circumstances, routine screening and return of pharmacogenomic variants unrelated to the indications for testing is appropriate in children who are undergoing genome-wide sequencing to assist in the diagnosis of a suspected genetic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bruce Carleton
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Pharmaceutical Outcomes Programme, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amalia M Issa
- Personalized Precision Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, Springfield, MA; Health Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA; Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA; Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bartha Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Mary V Relling
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Clara van Karnebeek
- Emma Center for Personalized Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Departments of Pediatrics and Human Genetics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; United for Metabolic Diseases, The Netherlands; Radboud Center for Mitochondrial and Metabolic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Danya Vears
- University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia; Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vears DF, Savulescu J, Christodoulou J, Wall M, Newson AJ. Are We Ready for Whole Population Genomic Sequencing of Asymptomatic Newborns? Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2023; 16:681-691. [PMID: 37415831 PMCID: PMC10321326 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s376083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of genomic sequencing technologies into routine newborn screening programs in some form is not only inevitable but also already occurring in some settings. The question is therefore not "if" but "when and how" genomic newborn screening (GNBS) should be implemented. In April 2022, the Centre for Ethics of Paediatric Genomics held a one-day symposium exploring ethical issues relating to the use of genomic sequencing in a range of clinical settings. This review article synthesises the panel discussion and presents both the potential benefits of wide-scale implementation of genomic newborn screening, as well as its practical and ethical issues, including obtaining appropriate consent, and health system implications. A more in-depth understanding of the barriers associated with implementing genomic newborn screening is critical to the success of GNBS programs, both from a practical perspective and also in order to maintain public trust in an important public health initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Chen Su Lan Centennial Professor in Medical Ethics, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Visiting Professorial Fellow in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, Melbourne University, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Christodoulou
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Meaghan Wall
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gyngell C, Lynch F, Vears D, Bowman-Smart H, Savulescu J, Christodoulou J. Storing paediatric genomic data for sequential interrogation across the lifespan. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2022-108471. [PMID: 37263770 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used in paediatric medicine to aid in screening, research and treatment. Some health systems are trialling GS as a first-line test in newborn screening programmes. Questions about what to do with genomic data after it has been generated are becoming more pertinent. While other research has outlined the ethical reasons for storing deidentified genomic data to be used in research, the ethical case for storing data for future clinical use has not been explicated. In this paper, we examine the ethical case for storing genomic data with the intention of using it as a lifetime health resource. In this model, genomic data would be stored with the intention of reanalysis at certain points through one's life. We argue this could benefit individuals and create an important public resource. However, several ethical challenges must first be met to achieve these benefits. We explore issues related to privacy, consent, justice and equality. We conclude by arguing that health systems should be moving towards futures that allow for the sequential interrogation of genomic data throughout the lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Danya Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of South Australia, Adeliade, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics - Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Christodoulou
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Brain and Mitochondrial Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalkman S, Dondorp W. The case for screening in early life for 'non-treatable' disorders: ethics, evidence and proportionality. A report from the Health Council of the Netherlands. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1155-1158. [PMID: 35132176 PMCID: PMC9554018 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01055-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the Netherlands, the call to add 'non-treatable' disorders to the newborn bloodspot screening programme has found a sympathetic ear with the Government. In 2019, the Health Council of the Netherlands was formally asked for advice on the conditions under which bloodspot screening for such disorders might be offered. Here we present the reasoning and the recommendations of the resulting report, and briefly discuss its reception. The report holds on to the classical view that screening must benefit the child, but argues for a wider account of child benefit than only in terms of substantial health gains. However, screening for 'non-treatable' disorders would still require evidence of a favourable benefits to harm ratio. The report presents a framework for such screening, but concludes that apart perhaps from Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), no or only very few 'non-treatable' disorders would at present meet its criteria. Setting up a screening programme that might benefit only a small percentage of families struggling with uncertainty about their child's diagnosis would not seem proportional. Instead, the Government is advised to invest in a better infrastructure for early referral, testing and care. The reaction to the report from proponents of such screening shows that the dividing line in the debate is not about whether screening neonates for 'non-treatable' disorders is acceptable in itself. It is rather whether such screening should be regarded as catering to a parental 'right to know', or as a public health service that should be subject to standards of evidence and proportionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shona Kalkman
- Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Wybo Dondorp
- Dept of Health, Ethics & Society, School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Communicating Personal Melanoma Polygenic Risk Information: Participants’ Experiences of Genetic Counseling in a Community-Based Study. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101581. [PMID: 36294720 PMCID: PMC9605561 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized polygenic risk information may be used to guide risk-based melanoma prevention and early detection at a population scale, but research on communicating this information is limited. This mixed-methods study aimed to assess the acceptability of a genetic counselor (GC) phone call in communicating polygenic risk information in the Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk randomized controlled trial. Participants (n = 509) received personalized melanoma polygenic risk information, an educational booklet on melanoma prevention, and a GC phone call, which was audio-recorded. Participants completed the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Survey 1-month after receiving their risk information (n = 346). A subgroup took part in a qualitative interview post-study completion (n = 20). Survey data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS, and thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted using NVivo 12.0 software. The survey showed a high level of acceptability for the GC phone call (mean satisfaction score overall: 4.3 out of 5, standard deviation (SD): 0.6) with differences according to gender (mean score for women: 4.4, SD: 0.6 vs. men: 4.2, SD: 0.7; p = 0.005), health literacy (lower literacy: 4.1, SD: 0.8; average: 4.3, SD: 0.6; higher: 4.4, SD: 0.6: p = 0.02) and polygenic risk group (low risk: 4.5, SD: 0.5, SD: average: 4.3, SD: 0.7, high: 4.3, SD: 0.7; p = 0.03). During the GC phone calls, the discussion predominately related to the impact of past sun exposure on personal melanoma risk. Together our findings point to the importance of further exploring educational and support needs and preferences for communicating personalized melanoma risk among population subgroups, including diverse literacy levels.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bick D, Ahmed A, Deen D, Ferlini A, Garnier N, Kasperaviciute D, Leblond M, Pichini A, Rendon A, Satija A, Tuff-Lacey A, Scott RH. Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:40. [PMID: 35892470 PMCID: PMC9326745 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8030040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening for treatable disorders is one of the great public health success stories of the twentieth century worldwide. This commentary examines the potential use of a new technology, next generation sequencing, in newborn screening through the lens of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Each of the ten criteria are examined to show how they might be applied by programmes using genomic sequencing as a screening tool. While there are obvious advantages to a method that can examine all disease-causing genes in a single assay at an ever-diminishing cost, implementation of genomic sequencing at scale presents numerous challenges, some which are intrinsic to screening for rare disease and some specifically linked to genomics-led screening. In addition to questions specific to routine screening considerations, the ethical, communication, data management, legal, and social implications of genomic screening programmes require consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bick
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Arzoo Ahmed
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Dasha Deen
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alessandra Ferlini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | | | - Dalia Kasperaviciute
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Mathilde Leblond
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Amanda Pichini
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Augusto Rendon
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Aditi Satija
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alice Tuff-Lacey
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Richard H. Scott
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burdon KP. The utility of genomic testing in the ophthalmology clinic: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 49:615-625. [PMID: 34231298 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Genomic testing assesses many genes in one test. It is often used in the diagnosis of heterogeneous single gene disorders where pathogenic variation in one of many genes are known to cause similar phenotypes, or where a clinical diagnosis is difficult to reach. In the ophthalmic setting, genomic testing can be used to diagnose several groups of diseases, including inherited retinal dystrophies, paediatric cataract, glaucoma and anterior segment dysgenesis and other syndromic developmental disorders with eye involvement. The testing can encompass several modalities ranging from whole genome sequencing to exome sequencing or targeted gene panels. The advantages to the patient of receiving a molecular diagnosis include an end to the diagnostic odyssey, determination of prognosis and clarification of treatment, access to accurate genetic counselling, and confirming eligibility for clinical trials or genetic specific therapies. Genomic testing is a powerful addition to the diagnosis and management of inherited eye disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn P Burdon
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|