1
|
Lunke S, Bouffler SE, Downie L, Caruana J, Amor DJ, Archibald A, Bombard Y, Christodoulou J, Clausen M, De Fazio P, Greaves RF, Hollizeck S, Kanga-Parabia A, Lang N, Lynch F, Peters R, Sadedin S, Tutty E, Eggers S, Lee C, Wall M, Yeung A, Gaff C, Gyngell C, Vears DF, Best S, Goranitis I, Stark Z. Prospective cohort study of genomic newborn screening: BabyScreen+ pilot study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081426. [PMID: 38569677 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is a highly successful public health programme that uses biochemical and other assays to screen for severe but treatable childhood-onset conditions. Introducing genomic sequencing into NBS programmes increases the range of detectable conditions but raises practical and ethical issues. Evidence from prospectively ascertained cohorts is required to guide policy and future implementation. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate a genomic NBS (gNBS) pilot programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The BabyScreen+ study will pilot gNBS in three phases. In the preimplementation phase, study materials, including education resources, decision support and data collection tools, will be designed. Focus groups and key informant interviews will also be undertaken to inform delivery of the study and future gNBS programmes. During the implementation phase, we will prospectively recruit birth parents in Victoria, Australia, to screen 1000 newborns for over 600 severe, treatable, childhood-onset conditions. Clinically accredited whole genome sequencing will be performed following standard NBS using the same sample. High chance results will be returned by genetic healthcare professionals, with follow-on genetic and other confirmatory testing and referral to specialist services as required. The postimplementation phase will evaluate the feasibility of gNBS as the primary aim, and assess ethical, implementation, psychosocial and health economic factors to inform future service delivery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project received ethics approval from the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Research Ethics Committee: HREC/91500/RCHM-2023, HREC/90929/RCHM-2022 and HREC/91392/RCHM-2022. Findings will be disseminated to policy-makers, and through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophie E Bouffler
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jade Caruana
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Christodoulou
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul De Fazio
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ronda F Greaves
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sebastian Hollizeck
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anaita Kanga-Parabia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nitzan Lang
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Simon Sadedin
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Tutty
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanie Eggers
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crystle Lee
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meaghan Wall
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Yeung
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vears DF, McLean A, La Spina C, McInerney-Leo A. Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Predictive and Presymptomatic Genetic Testing in Adults and Children. Twin Res Hum Genet 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38509872 DOI: 10.1017/thg.2024.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
This Position Statement provides guidelines for health professionals who work with individuals and families seeking predictive genetic testing and laboratory staff conducting the tests. It presents the major practical, psychosocial and ethical considerations associated with presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in adults who have the capacity to make a decision, children and young people who lack capacity, and adults living with reduced or fluctuating cognitive capacity.Predictive Testing Recommendations: (1) Predictive testing in adults, young people and children should only be offered with pretest genetic counseling, and the option of post-test genetic counseling. (2) An individual considering whether to have a predictive test should be supported to make an autonomous and informed decision. Regarding Children and Young People: (1) Predictive testing should only be offered to children and young people for conditions where there is likely to be a direct medical benefit to them through surveillance, use of prevention strategies, or other medical interventions in the immediate future. (2) Where symptoms are likely to develop in childhood, in the absence of direct medical benefit from this knowledge, genetic health professionals and parents/guardians should discuss whether undertaking predictive testing is the best course of action for the child and the family as a whole. (3) Where symptoms are likely to develop in adulthood, the default position should be to postpone predictive testing until the young person achieves the capacity to make an autonomous and informed decision. This is applicable regardless of whether there is some action that can be taken in adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison McLean
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Precision Medicine and Bioinformatics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Western Clinical School, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chloe La Spina
- Western Clinical School, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Genetics Department, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aideen McInerney-Leo
- Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lynch F, Meng Y, Best S, Goranitis I, Savulescu J, Gyngell C, Vears DF. Australian public perspectives on genomic data governance: responsibility, regulation, and logistical considerations. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:295-301. [PMID: 37165103 PMCID: PMC10923910 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01381-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic sequencing generates huge volumes of data, which may be collected or donated to form large genomic databases. Such information can be stored for future use, either for the data donor themselves or by researchers to help improve our understanding of the genetic basis of disease. Creating datasets of this magnitude and diversity is only possible if patients, their families, and members of the public worldwide share their data. However, there is no consensus on the best technical approach to data sharing that also minimises risks to individuals and exploration of stakeholders' views on aspects of genomic data governance models-the ways genomic data is stored, managed, shared and used-has been minimal. To address this need, we conducted focus groups with 39 members of the Australian public exploring their views and preferences for different aspects of genomic data governance models. We found that consent and control were essential to participants, as they wanted the option to choose who had access to their data and for what purposes. Critically, participants wanted a trustworthy body to enforce regulation of data storage, sharing and usage. While participants recognised the importance of data accessibility, they also expressed a strong desire for data security. Finally, financial responsibility for data storage raised concerns for inequity as well as organisations and individuals using data in ethically contentious ways to generate profit. Our findings highlight some of the trade-offs that need to be considered in the development of genomic data governance systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Yan Meng
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Chen Su Lan Centennial Professor in Medical Ethics, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allen JW, Gyngell C, Koplin JJ, Vears DF. The Parliamentary Inquiry into Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve's Law) Bill 2021 in Australia: A Qualitative Analysis. J Bioeth Inq 2024; 21:67-80. [PMID: 37530962 PMCID: PMC11052762 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10257-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Recently, Australia became the second jurisdiction worldwide to legalize the use of mitochondrial donation technology. The Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve's Law) Bill 2021 allows individuals with a family history of mitochondrial disease to access assisted reproductive techniques that prevent the inheritance of mitochondrial disease. Using inductive content analysis, we assessed submissions sent to the Senate Committee as part of a programme of scientific inquiry and public consultation that informed drafting of the Bill. These submissions discussed a range of bioethical and legal considerations of central importance to the political debate. Significantly, submissions from those with a first-hand experience of mitochondrial disease, including clinicians and those with a family history of mitochondrial disease, were in strong support of this legislation. Those in support of the Bill commended the two-staged approach and rigorous licencing requirements as part of the Bill's implementation strategy. Submissions which outlined arguments against the legislation either opposed the use of these techniques in general or opposed aspects of the implementation strategy in Australia. These findings offer a window into the ethical arguments and perspectives that matter most to those Australians who took part in the Senate inquiry into mitochondrial donation. The insights garnered from these submissions may be used to help refine policy and guidelines as the field progresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julian J Koplin
- Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Australia
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coghlan S, Gyngell C, Vears DF. Ethics of artificial intelligence in prenatal and pediatric genomic medicine. J Community Genet 2024; 15:13-24. [PMID: 37796364 PMCID: PMC10857992 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00678-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper examines the ethics of introducing emerging forms of artificial intelligence (AI) into prenatal and pediatric genomic medicine. Application of genomic AI to these early life settings has not received much attention in the ethics literature. We focus on three contexts: (1) prenatal genomic sequencing for possible fetal abnormalities, (2) rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children, and (3) reanalysis of genomic data obtained from children for diagnostic purposes. The paper identifies and discusses various ethical issues in the possible application of genomic AI in these settings, especially as they relate to concepts of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, justice, transparency, accountability, privacy, and trust. The examination will inform the ethically sound introduction of genomic AI in early human life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Coghlan
- School of Computing and Information Systems (CIS), Centre for AI and Digital Ethics (CAIDE), The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision Making and Society (ADM+S), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vears DF, Lynch F, Nisselle A, Ayres S, Stark Z. Rapid genomic testing in critically ill patients with genetic conditions: position statement by the Human Genetics Society of Australasia. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:150-154. [PMID: 37864047 PMCID: PMC10853566 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01477-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amy Nisselle
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samantha Ayres
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lynch F, Best S, Gaff C, Downie L, Archibald AD, Gyngell C, Goranitis I, Peters R, Savulescu J, Lunke S, Stark Z, Vears DF. Australian Public Perspectives on Genomic Newborn Screening: Risks, Benefits, and Preferences for Implementation. Int J Neonatal Screen 2024; 10:6. [PMID: 38248635 PMCID: PMC10801595 DOI: 10.3390/ijns10010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent dramatic reductions in the timeframe in which genomic sequencing can deliver results means its application in time-sensitive screening programs such as newborn screening (NBS) is becoming a reality. As genomic NBS (gNBS) programs are developed around the world, there is an increasing need to address the ethical and social issues that such initiatives raise. This study therefore aimed to explore the Australian public's perspectives and values regarding key gNBS characteristics and preferences for service delivery. We recruited English-speaking members of the Australian public over 18 years of age via social media; 75 people aged 23-72 participated in 1 of 15 focus groups. Participants were generally supportive of introducing genomic sequencing into newborn screening, with several stating that the adoption of such revolutionary and beneficial technology was a moral obligation. Participants consistently highlighted receiving an early diagnosis as the leading benefit, which was frequently linked to the potential for early treatment and intervention, or access to other forms of assistance, such as peer support. Informing parents about the test during pregnancy was considered important. This study provides insights into the Australian public's views and preferences to inform the delivery of a gNBS program in the Australian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Melbourne Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Alison D. Archibald
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (C.G.); (L.D.); (A.D.A.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Riccarda Peters
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (I.G.); (Z.S.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.L.); (C.G.); (J.S.)
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuiper JML, Borry P, Vears DF, Van Esch H, Cornel MC, Van Hoyweghen I. Dealing with ambivalence in the practice of advanced genetic healthcare: towards an ethical choreography. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1387-1392. [PMID: 37592172 PMCID: PMC10689481 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01436-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in diagnostic practice has stimulated ongoing debates on how to construct and perform "good" genomic care. Our multi-sited qualitative fieldwork at two large European centres for human genetics (CHGs) revealed tangible ambivalence in beliefs, norms, and actions in the enactment of NGS practices across sites stemming from differing expectations, interests, demands, and tensions. First, ambivalence was present around the boundaries of clinical diagnostic genetic care. The overlap between research and clinical work and diagnostics and screening led to ambivalence around "best" practices and norms concerning whom to offer NGS testing and how far to take testing. Secondly, the clinical value of NGS results, especially VUS and unsolicited findings, was ambivalently valued, resulting in an inconsistent approach towards these types of findings. Thirdly, ambivalence was recognized in applying guidelines in the reality of clinical practice. The ambivalence we encountered was often not made explicit or acknowledged, causing a failure to benefit from its possibility to encourage reflexivity and change. We propose to facilitate a more explicit ethical choreography [27], where ethics and science are developed iteratively whilst welcoming different perspectives and disciplines. Pulling experiences and practices of ambivalence into the light can help to understand the points of tension in the values and internal logic in care practices within the CHGs and facilitate a more informed, transparent, and consciously chosen direction for genetic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Hilde Van Esch
- Center for Human genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Human Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lynch F, Gillam L, Vears DF. Alleviating the confusion around content analysis: A comment in response to Wainstein, Elliott & Austin 2023. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 37877543 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vears DF, Savulescu J, Christodoulou J, Wall M, Newson AJ. Are We Ready for Whole Population Genomic Sequencing of Asymptomatic Newborns? Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2023; 16:681-691. [PMID: 37415831 PMCID: PMC10321326 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s376083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of genomic sequencing technologies into routine newborn screening programs in some form is not only inevitable but also already occurring in some settings. The question is therefore not "if" but "when and how" genomic newborn screening (GNBS) should be implemented. In April 2022, the Centre for Ethics of Paediatric Genomics held a one-day symposium exploring ethical issues relating to the use of genomic sequencing in a range of clinical settings. This review article synthesises the panel discussion and presents both the potential benefits of wide-scale implementation of genomic newborn screening, as well as its practical and ethical issues, including obtaining appropriate consent, and health system implications. A more in-depth understanding of the barriers associated with implementing genomic newborn screening is critical to the success of GNBS programs, both from a practical perspective and also in order to maintain public trust in an important public health initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Chen Su Lan Centennial Professor in Medical Ethics, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Visiting Professorial Fellow in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, Melbourne University, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Christodoulou
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Meaghan Wall
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Phillips A, Dewitte I, Debruyne B, Vears DF, Borry P. Disclosure of genetic risk in the family: A survey of the Flemish general population. Eur J Med Genet 2023:104800. [PMID: 37336289 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2023.104800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Results from genomic sequencing often have implications not just for patients but also for their relatives. To date, there are no studies in Belgium exploring whether potential relatives would want to be informed of a genetic risk in the family and their preferences on different approaches to disclosure. METHODS We surveyed the attitudes of the Flemish general population (n = 407) towards receiving genetic information from their family members, including attitudes towards breaches in confidentiality, preferences for who communicates genetic risk and how the information is communicated, and policy approaches to nondisclosure. RESULTS Most participants wanted to be informed of their genetic risk and receive genetic testing to confirm their diagnosis. Most preferred to be informed of genetic risk by a close family member, but that when given the choice between a distant family member and a clinician, most participants preferred to be contacted by a clinician. CONCLUSION In Belgium there is currently no clear legal pathway for clinicians to directly initiate contact with at-risk relatives, but the responses from members of the Flemish population analyzed in this study indicate that this approach to disclosure of genetic risk deserves further consideration. Our findings indicate that the general population would support legislation allowing clinicians to inform relatives even in cases where the patient did not want to inform them. As this is not currently allowed in Belgium, policy alternatives should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amicia Phillips
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Iris Dewitte
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bo Debruyne
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bouffler SE, Lee L, Lynch F, Martyn M, Lynch E, Macciocca I, Curnow L, McCorkell G, Lunke S, Chong B, Marum JE, Delatycki M, Downie L, Goranitis I, Vears DF, Best S, Clausen M, Bombard Y, Stark Z, Gaff CL. Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072999. [PMID: 37270192 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As routine genomic testing expands, so too does the opportunity to look for additional health information unrelated to the original reason for testing, termed additional findings (AF). Analysis for many different types of AF may be available, particularly to families undergoing trio genomic testing. The optimal model for service delivery remains to be determined, especially when the original test occurs in the acute care setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Families enrolled in a national study providing ultrarapid genomic testing to critically ill children will be offered analysis for three types of AF on their stored genomic data: paediatric-onset conditions in the child, adult-onset conditions in each parent and reproductive carrier screening for the parents as a couple. The offer will be made 3-6 months after diagnostic testing. Parents will have access to a modified version of the Genetics Adviser web-based decision support tool before attending a genetic counselling appointment to discuss consent for AF. Parental experiences will be evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods on data collected through surveys, appointment recordings and interviews at multiple time points. Evaluation will focus on parental preferences, uptake, decision support use and understanding of AF. Genetic health professionals' perspectives on acceptability and feasibility of AF will also be captured through surveys and interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project received ethics approval from the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee as part of the Australian Genomics Health Alliance protocol: HREC/16/MH/251. Findings will be disseminated through peer-review journal articles and at conferences nationally and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ling Lee
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ivan Macciocca
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisette Curnow
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giulia McCorkell
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Chong
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justine E Marum
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne Schoold of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara L Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vears DF, Hallowell N, Bentzen HB, Ellul B, Nøst TH, Kerasidou A, Kerr SM, Th Mayrhofer M, Mežinska S, Ormondroyd E, Solberg B, Sand BW, Budin-Ljøsne I. A practical checklist for return of results from genomic research in the European context. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:687-695. [PMID: 36949262 PMCID: PMC10250331 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01328-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of European research projects return, or plan to return, individual genomic research results (IRR) to participants. While data access is a data subject's right under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and many legal and ethical guidelines allow or require participants to receive personal data generated in research, the practice of returning results is not straightforward and raises several practical and ethical issues. Existing guidelines focusing on return of IRR are mostly project-specific, only discuss which results to return, or were developed outside Europe. To address this gap, we analysed existing normative documents identified online using inductive content analysis. We used this analysis to develop a checklist of steps to assist European researchers considering whether to return IRR to participants. We then sought feedback on the checklist from an interdisciplinary panel of European experts (clinicians, clinical researchers, population-based researchers, biobank managers, ethicists, lawyers and policy makers) to refine the checklist. The checklist outlines seven major components researchers should consider when determining whether, and how, to return results to adult research participants: 1) Decide which results to return; 2) Develop a plan for return of results; 3) Obtain participant informed consent; 4) Collect and analyse data; 5) Confirm results; 6) Disclose research results; 7) Follow-up and monitor. Our checklist provides a clear outline of the steps European researchers can follow to develop ethical and sustainable result return pathways within their own research projects. Further legal analysis is required to ensure this checklist complies with relevant domestic laws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7RF, UK.
| | - Nina Hallowell
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7RF, UK
| | - Heidi Beate Bentzen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bridget Ellul
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Therese Haugdahl Nøst
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N- 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Angeliki Kerasidou
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7RF, UK
| | - Shona M Kerr
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | | | - Signe Mežinska
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Elizabeth Ormondroyd
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre United Kingdom, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Berge Solberg
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Division of Climate and Environmental Health, Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arkell K, Gyngell C, Stark Z, Vears DF. Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges. Children (Basel) 2023; 10:children10050824. [PMID: 37238372 DOI: 10.3390/children10050824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Ultra-rapid genomic sequencing (urGS) is increasingly used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care settings (NICU/PICU), demonstrating high diagnostic and clinical utility. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HPs) and the challenges raised by urGS, particularly when making treatment decisions. Four focus groups and two interviews were conducted with HPs who had experience using urGS in NICU/PICU. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the data. Nineteen HPs participated overall (eight clinical geneticists, nine genetic counselors, and two intensivists). One challenging area of practice identified by HPs was setting realistic expectations for outcomes of urGS among HPs and families. HPs reported modifying pre-test counseling to include life-limiting diagnoses as a possible test outcome and felt concerned about the timing of the test and its impact on parent-child bonding. UrGS results of uncertain prognostic significance posed considerable challenges. Moral distress arose when families and HPs were misaligned regarding treatment goals following the urGS diagnosis. We identified areas of practice that remain ethically challenging for HPs using urGS in the NICU/PICU. HPs experiences of using urGS in the NICU/PICU could inform specialized training in withdrawal of treatment decision making for the genomics workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Arkell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vears DF, Boyle J, Jacobs C, McInerney-Leo A, Newson AJ. Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Genetic Carrier Testing for Recessive Conditions. Twin Res Hum Genet 2023; 26:188-194. [PMID: 37226803 DOI: 10.1017/thg.2023.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
This Position Statement provides guidelines to assist all health professionals who receive requests for carrier testing and laboratory staff conducting the tests.In this Statement, the term 'carrier testing' refers to genetic testing in an individual to determine whether they have inherited a pathogenic variant associated with an autosomal or X-linked recessive condition previously identified in a blood relative. Carrier testing recommendations: (1) Carrier testing should only be performed with the individual's knowledge and consent; (2) An individual considering (for themselves, or on behalf of another) whether to have a carrier test should be supported to make an informed decision; (3) The mode of inheritance, the individual's personal experience with the condition, and the healthcare setting in which the test is being performed should be considered when determining whether carrier testing should be offered by a genetic health professional. Regarding children and young people: Unless there is direct medical benefit in the immediate future, the default position should be to postpone carrier testing until the child or young person can be supported to make an informed decision. There may be some specific situations where it is appropriate to facilitate carrier testing in children and young people (see section in this article). In such cases, testing should only be offered with pre- and post-test genetic counseling in which genetic health professionals and parents/guardians should explore the rationale for testing and the interests of the child and the family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jackie Boyle
- Genetics of Learning Disability Service, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aideen McInerney-Leo
- Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kuiper JML, Borry P, Vears DF, Van Esch H, Van Hoyweghen I. Navigating the uncertainties of next-generation sequencing in the genetics clinic. Sociol Health Illn 2023; 45:465-484. [PMID: 36189958 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the different manifestations and navigations of uncertainty in the practice of diagnostic next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Drawing upon multi-sited fieldwork conducted at a large Centre for Human Genetics in Belgium, we analyse how uncertainty takes shape and is managed in the different steps of the diagnostic process: starting from the testing offer, to the analysis in the lab, the multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) and ending with the consultation with the patient. Building on interviews with genetic healthcare professionals and their patients and observations in consultations and MDTs, our empirical work underlines the duality of uncertainty as both burdensome and productive. Building on the existing literature on uncertainty in medicine and NGS, our analysis shows the ontological politics at play in the everyday uncertainty work in this CHG. We show how the, at times, contrasting ways of dealing with uncertainty lead to friction but also result in constructive negotiation and collaboration between actors, making use of multiple types of evidence and expertise. By not only minimising but also sustaining or inviting uncertainty, genetic healthcare professionals are able to advance the practices around NGS in a way that matches their multidisciplinary understandings, considerations and more normative stances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Hilde Van Esch
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Notini L, Gaff C, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Offering and Returning Secondary Findings in the Context of Exome Sequencing for Hearing Loss: Clinicians' Views and Experiences. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2023; 14:74-83. [PMID: 36595590 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2160507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is ongoing debate regarding whether and under which circumstances secondary findings (SF) should be offered in the pediatric context. Although studies have examined patient perspectives on receiving SF, little research has been conducted examining the experiences of clinicians offering SF to parents of newborns receiving genomic sequencing for a recently diagnosed medical condition. METHODS To address this, we conducted qualitative interviews exploring the views and experiences of 12 clinicians who offered SF to parents of infants who had diagnostic exome sequencing (ES) to identify the cause of their hearing loss. Interviews explored clinicians' accounts of parents' choices and decision-making about receiving SF, their views on whether and when to offer SF, their experiences returning SF, and any ethical challenges they encountered. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS Clinicians reported parents who declined all SF often felt finding out about future conditions unrelated to their child's hearing loss may be unhelpful, or even harmful, or were overwhelmed by their child's diagnosis. Clinicians also reported that some parents chose SF because they felt obliged to, even if they did not want to receive them. They explained that while some parents experienced decision-making regarding SF as positive, for others, this process was challenging or distressing. While clinicians generally agreed SF should be offered, mainly to promote parental choice, most felt SF should be offered after disclosing diagnostic results, primarily to avoid overwhelming parents. Clinicians encountered several ethical challenges, including balancing parental autonomy with non-maleficence, wanting to report or not report certain SF, and questioning whether parents can make an autonomous choice regarding SF. CONCLUSIONS Our findings, which are novel as they relate to parents of young infants with a recent diagnosis of hearing loss, add new insights into clinicians' and parents' decision-making regarding SF in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Notini
- University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Chen Su Lan Centennial Professor in Medical Ethics, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Danya F Vears
- University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lynch F, Meng Y, Best S, Goranitis I, Savulescu J, Gyngell C, Vears DF. Australian public perspectives on genomic data storage and sharing: Benefits, concerns and access preferences. Eur J Med Genet 2023; 66:104676. [PMID: 36473622 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic genomic sequencing generates unprecedented amounts of data. In addition to its primary use, this data could be used for a wide range of secondary purposes, including research and informing future healthcare for the data donor. These opportunities may require data to be shared with third parties. Although effective data sharing relies on public support, there are barriers which may prevent people from choosing to donate their genomic data and surprisingly few studies explore these barriers in depth. To address this need, this study aimed to qualitatively explore the Australian public's views and preferences for storing and sharing genomic data. Online focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using inductive content analysis. A total of 7 focus groups were conducted with 39 members of the Australian public ranging from 18 to 67 years of age. Participants were mostly supportive of genomic data being stored and shared for secondary purposes, recognising the potential benefits for individual health and wider medical research. However, some concerns were identified. Participants felt genomic data was particularly sensitive information, and raised the potential for discrimination, stigma, and other malicious uses of such data. Concerns for privacy and security of the data were also prevalent. Trustworthiness of data users was important when considering who genomic data should be shared with. Although participants were supportive of data being freely available to health professionals and researchers, they were opposed to insurance companies and employers accessing the data. There was greater controversy around sharing data with law enforcement and pharmaceutical companies. Participants recognised both benefits and harms to sharing with law enforcement. They were also cognizant of the dual purpose of pharmaceutical companies as both research and profit-driven organisations. Finally, participants expressed varying perspectives about sharing genomic data with family members, yet most agreed that explicit consent from the data donor should be required to share their information with relatives. This study highlighted several of the Australian public's perceived barriers and motivators for the storage and sharing of genomic data. Participants recognised both the benefits of collecting, storing and sharing such data widely but also the potential for harm from data misuse. While public acceptance of such endeavours is required to maximise the volume of data made available, the concerns around data access and security need to be addressed before this can occur. These findings also highlight the nuance and ethical complexity of decisions about who we should allow to access donated genomic data. These perspectives will be essential in helping to shape the way large-scale genomic data storage and sharing is developed and implemented in Australia, and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lynch
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Yan Meng
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Australia
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Chen Su Lan Centennial Professor in Medical Ethics, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia; Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cao M, Notini L, Ayres S, Vears DF. Australian healthcare professionals' perspectives on the ethical and practical issues associated with genomic newborn screening. J Genet Couns 2022; 32:376-386. [PMID: 36245433 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is a successful public health initiative that seeks to identify serious, treatable medical conditions. The increasing use of genomic sequencing (GS) in a wide range of medical settings has reignited the discussion on whether GS can and should be integrated into NBS. Yet, the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Australia on the ethical and practical issues associated with the implementation of genomic newborn screening (GNBS) are underexplored. To address this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 Australian HCPs with clinical or policy experience in NBS and/or GS to explore their perspectives on the ethical, social, and practical issues raised by integrating GS into NBS. Interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis. When asked whether GS should be incorporated into NBS, HCPs did not feel it was currently appropriate but there was a strong consensus it may be implemented within the next decade. However, HCPs had differing perspectives on what conditions should be included and how to best handle the volume of data generated from GNBS. Our findings have important implications for determining at what point and how genomics can be integrated into NBS. The differing views expressed amongst HCPs suggest that further research is needed to explore the reasons behind this. Importantly, our participants highlighted a potential role for genetic counselors in the implementation of GNBS on a larger scale by developing educational resources to facilitate obtaining informed consent and return of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Cao
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren Notini
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samantha Ayres
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bowman-Smart H, Vears DF, Brett GR, Martyn M, Stark Z, Gyngell C. 'Diagnostic shock': the impact of results from ultrarapid genomic sequencing of critically unwell children on aspects of family functioning. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1036-1043. [PMID: 35831422 PMCID: PMC9436940 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01140-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) is being increasingly used in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units. While there is emerging evidence of clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of delivering genomic results in an acute care setting. To help investigate these concerns, we analysed survey data collected from caregivers whose children had received rGS through a national rapid genomic diagnosis program. The impact of rGS on families was assessed through the PedsQL2.0 Family Impact Module and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6). Sixty-one parents/carers completed the survey during the study period (response rate 48%; 61/128). Mean parent and family functioning was reduced in this sample, reflecting the stressful conditions facing families with critically unwell children. We found caregivers whose children had received a diagnostic result through rGS reported a reduced family relationships score compared to caregivers of children who did not receive a diagnosis. These findings have implications for genetic counselling practice in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gemma R Brett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Phillips A, Bronselaer T, Borry P, Van Hoyweghen I, Vears DF, Pasquier L, Callens S. Informing relatives of their genetic risk: an examination of the Belgian legal context. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:766-771. [PMID: 34997232 PMCID: PMC9259709 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-01016-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Findings from genomic sequencing can have important implications for patients and relatives. For this reason, most professional guidelines support that patients have an ethical duty to inform relatives and, when disclosure does not occur, most guidelines allow health-care professionals (HCPs) to breach confidentiality. Translating the ethical duties to respect the patient's confidentiality and prevent harm in at-risk relatives into legislation is a complex issue due to the both personal and familial nature of genetic information. In many countries there is no specific guideline or law addressing family communication of genetic information and thus it is unclear what duties patients and HCPs have towards at-risk relatives. Using Belgium as an example for countries in which this is the case, we examined the existing Belgian legislation in relation to three central topics: (1) patients' duties to family members, (2) respect for patient confidentiality and privacy, and (3) HCPs' duties to family members. We then investigated international legal frameworks and compared it with the Belgian context to see to what degree international precedent could aid in the interpretation of Belgian law. Based on our review of the legislation, we make recommendations for the interpretation of current law and examine whether there is sufficient legal precedent to answer the questions central to family communication of genetic information. Although we focus on the specific Belgian legislation, the discussions are relevant for many other countries that have similar legislative approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amicia Phillips
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Bronselaer
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ine Van Hoyweghen
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F. Vears
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ,grid.1058.c0000 0000 9442 535XBiomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ,grid.411154.40000 0001 2175 0984Service de Génétique Clinique, Centre Référence “Déficiences Intellectuelles de causes rares” (CRDI), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Stefaan Callens
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Koplin JJ, Gyngell C, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Moving from 'fully' to 'appropriately' informed consent in genomics: The PROMICE framework. Bioethics 2022; 36:655-665. [PMID: 35390218 PMCID: PMC9321597 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Genomic sequencing technologies (GS) pose novel challenges not seen in older genetic technologies, making traditional standards for fully informed consent difficult or impossible to meet. This is due to factors including the complexity of the test and the broad range of results it may identify. Meaningful informed consent is even more challenging to secure in contexts involving significant time constraints and emotional distress, such as when rapid genomic testing (RGS) is performed in neonatal intensive care units. In this article, we propose that informed consent matters not for its own sake, but because obtaining it furthers a range of morally important goals, such as promoting autonomy, well-being, and trust in medicine. These goals form the basis of a new framework [PROmoting Morally Important Consent Ends (PROMICE)] for assessing the ethical appropriateness of various informed consent models. We illustrate this framework with two examples: (a) a tiered and layered consent model for obtaining consent for GS, and (b) consent for RGS in critically ill newborns. We conclude that appropriately-rather than fully-informed consent provides the correct standard for genomic medicine and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian J. Koplin
- Biomedical Ethics Research GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Melbourne Law SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Melbourne Law SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Melbourne Law SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical EthicsOxford UniversityOxfordUK
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Melbourne Law SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Notini L, Gaff CL, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Clinicians' Views and Experiences with Offering and Returning Results from Exome Sequencing to Parents of Infants with Hearing Loss. J Clin Med 2021; 11:35. [PMID: 35011775 PMCID: PMC8745321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Exome sequencing (ES) is an effective method for identifying the genetic cause of hearing loss in infants diagnosed through newborn hearing screening programs. ES has the potential to be integrated into routine clinical care, yet little is known about the experiences of clinicians offering this test to families. To address this gap, clinicians involved in a clinical study using ES to identify the cause of infants' hearing loss were interviewed to explore their experiences with offering and returning results to parents. Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive content analysis. Twelve clinicians participated: seven genetic counsellors, four clinical geneticists, and one paediatrician. Most clinicians were supportive of offering ES to infants with hearing loss, primarily because results may inform the child's clinical management. However, some expressed concerns, questioning the utility of this information, particularly for isolated hearing loss. Clinicians had differing views regarding the optimal time to offer ES to families; while some felt that families can manage everything at once, others recommended delaying testing until parents have come to terms with their child's diagnosis. These findings show the complexity involved in determining how ES should be offered to families following the diagnosis of a child with hearing loss, particularly with regards to when testing is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Notini
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
| | - Clara L. Gaff
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rehm HL, Page AJ, Smith L, Adams JB, Alterovitz G, Babb LJ, Barkley MP, Baudis M, Beauvais MJ, Beck T, Beckmann JS, Beltran S, Bernick D, Bernier A, Bonfield JK, Boughtwood TF, Bourque G, Bowers SR, Brookes AJ, Brudno M, Brush MH, Bujold D, Burdett T, Buske OJ, Cabili MN, Cameron DL, Carroll RJ, Casas-Silva E, Chakravarty D, Chaudhari BP, Chen SH, Cherry JM, Chung J, Cline M, Clissold HL, Cook-Deegan RM, Courtot M, Cunningham F, Cupak M, Davies RM, Denisko D, Doerr MJ, Dolman LI, Dove ES, Dursi LJ, Dyke SO, Eddy JA, Eilbeck K, Ellrott KP, Fairley S, Fakhro KA, Firth HV, Fitzsimons MS, Fiume M, Flicek P, Fore IM, Freeberg MA, Freimuth RR, Fromont LA, Fuerth J, Gaff CL, Gan W, Ghanaim EM, Glazer D, Green RC, Griffith M, Griffith OL, Grossman RL, Groza T, Guidry Auvil JM, Guigó R, Gupta D, Haendel MA, Hamosh A, Hansen DP, Hart RK, Hartley DM, Haussler D, Hendricks-Sturrup RM, Ho CW, Hobb AE, Hoffman MM, Hofmann OM, Holub P, Hsu JS, Hubaux JP, Hunt SE, Husami A, Jacobsen JO, Jamuar SS, Janes EL, Jeanson F, Jené A, Johns AL, Joly Y, Jones SJ, Kanitz A, Kato K, Keane TM, Kekesi-Lafrance K, Kelleher J, Kerry G, Khor SS, Knoppers BM, Konopko MA, Kosaki K, Kuba M, Lawson J, Leinonen R, Li S, Lin MF, Linden M, Liu X, Liyanage IU, Lopez J, Lucassen AM, Lukowski M, Mann AL, Marshall J, Mattioni M, Metke-Jimenez A, Middleton A, Milne RJ, Molnár-Gábor F, Mulder N, Munoz-Torres MC, Nag R, Nakagawa H, Nasir J, Navarro A, Nelson TH, Niewielska A, Nisselle A, Niu J, Nyrönen TH, O’Connor BD, Oesterle S, Ogishima S, Ota Wang V, Paglione LA, Palumbo E, Parkinson HE, Philippakis AA, Pizarro AD, Prlic A, Rambla J, Rendon A, Rider RA, Robinson PN, Rodarmer KW, Rodriguez LL, Rubin AF, Rueda M, Rushton GA, Ryan RS, Saunders GI, Schuilenburg H, Schwede T, Scollen S, Senf A, Sheffield NC, Skantharajah N, Smith AV, Sofia HJ, Spalding D, Spurdle AB, Stark Z, Stein LD, Suematsu M, Tan P, Tedds JA, Thomson AA, Thorogood A, Tickle TL, Tokunaga K, Törnroos J, Torrents D, Upchurch S, Valencia A, Guimera RV, Vamathevan J, Varma S, Vears DF, Viner C, Voisin C, Wagner AH, Wallace SE, Walsh BP, Williams MS, Winkler EC, Wold BJ, Wood GM, Woolley JP, Yamasaki C, Yates AD, Yung CK, Zass LJ, Zaytseva K, Zhang J, Goodhand P, North K, Birney E. GA4GH: International policies and standards for data sharing across genomic research and healthcare. Cell Genom 2021; 1:100029. [PMID: 35072136 PMCID: PMC8774288 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) aims to accelerate biomedical advances by enabling the responsible sharing of clinical and genomic data through both harmonized data aggregation and federated approaches. The decreasing cost of genomic sequencing (along with other genome-wide molecular assays) and increasing evidence of its clinical utility will soon drive the generation of sequence data from tens of millions of humans, with increasing levels of diversity. In this perspective, we present the GA4GH strategies for addressing the major challenges of this data revolution. We describe the GA4GH organization, which is fueled by the development efforts of eight Work Streams and informed by the needs of 24 Driver Projects and other key stakeholders. We present the GA4GH suite of secure, interoperable technical standards and policy frameworks and review the current status of standards, their relevance to key domains of research and clinical care, and future plans of GA4GH. Broad international participation in building, adopting, and deploying GA4GH standards and frameworks will catalyze an unprecedented effort in data sharing that will be critical to advancing genomic medicine and ensuring that all populations can access its benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi L. Rehm
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angela J.H. Page
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindsay Smith
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy B. Adams
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gil Alterovitz
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Baudis
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael J.S. Beauvais
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tim Beck
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Sergi Beltran
- CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Bernick
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Tiffany F. Boughtwood
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Guillaume Bourque
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Center for Computational Genomics, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Brudno
- Canadian Center for Computational Genomics, Montreal, QC, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Canadian Distributed Infrastructure for Genomics (CanDIG), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - David Bujold
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Center for Computational Genomics, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Distributed Infrastructure for Genomics (CanDIG), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tony Burdett
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | | | - Daniel L. Cameron
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Bimal P. Chaudhari
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shu Hui Chen
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Justina Chung
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa Cline
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Mélanie Courtot
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Fiona Cunningham
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - L. Jonathan Dursi
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Canadian Distributed Infrastructure for Genomics (CanDIG), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan Fairley
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Khalid A. Fakhro
- Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
- Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - Helen V. Firth
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Paul Flicek
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Ian M. Fore
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mallory A. Freeberg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Lauren A. Fromont
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Clara L. Gaff
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Weiniu Gan
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elena M. Ghanaim
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David Glazer
- Verily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert C. Green
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Malachi Griffith
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Obi L. Griffith
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Roderic Guigó
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dipayan Gupta
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Ada Hamosh
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David P. Hansen
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Reece K. Hart
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Invitae, San Francisco, CA, USA
- MyOme, Inc, San Bruno, CA, USA
| | | | - David Haussler
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael M. Hoffman
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Oliver M. Hofmann
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Petr Holub
- BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria
- Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Sarah E. Hunt
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Ammar Husami
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Saumya S. Jamuar
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Elizabeth L. Janes
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | - Aina Jené
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amber L. Johns
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Yann Joly
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven J.M. Jones
- Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander Kanitz
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas M. Keane
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kristina Kekesi-Lafrance
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Giselle Kerry
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Seik-Soon Khor
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rasko Leinonen
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Stephanie Li
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mikael Linden
- CSC–IT Center for Science, Espoo, Finland
- ELIXIR Finland, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Isuru Udara Liyanage
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Alice L. Mann
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Anna Middleton
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard J. Milne
- Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Nicola Mulder
- H3ABioNet, Computational Biology Division, IDM, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Rishi Nag
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- Japan Agency for Medical Research & Development (AMED), Tokyo, Japan
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | - Arcadi Navarro
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ania Niewielska
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Amy Nisselle
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Human Genetics Society of Australasia Education, Ethics & Social Issues Committee, Alexandria, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Niu
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tommi H. Nyrönen
- CSC–IT Center for Science, Espoo, Finland
- ELIXIR Finland, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Sabine Oesterle
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Vivian Ota Wang
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Emilio Palumbo
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helen E. Parkinson
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jordi Rambla
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Renee A. Rider
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter N. Robinson
- The Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, CT, USA
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Kurt W. Rodarmer
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Alan F. Rubin
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Manuel Rueda
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Helen Schuilenburg
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Torsten Schwede
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Neerjah Skantharajah
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Heidi J. Sofia
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dylan Spalding
- CSC–IT Center for Science, Espoo, Finland
- ELIXIR Finland, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lincoln D. Stein
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patrick Tan
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- Precision Health Research Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | | | - Alastair A. Thomson
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Adrian Thorogood
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | | | - Katsushi Tokunaga
- University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Juha Törnroos
- CSC–IT Center for Science, Espoo, Finland
- ELIXIR Finland, Espoo, Finland
| | - David Torrents
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sean Upchurch
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Alfonso Valencia
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jessica Vamathevan
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Susheel Varma
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Human Genetics Society of Australasia Education, Ethics & Social Issues Committee, Alexandria, NSW, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Coby Viner
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alex H. Wagner
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eva C. Winkler
- Section of Translational Medical Ethics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew D. Yates
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Christina K. Yung
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Indoc Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lyndon J. Zass
- H3ABioNet, Computational Biology Division, IDM, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ksenia Zaytseva
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Computational Genomics, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Junjun Zhang
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Goodhand
- Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathryn North
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ewan Birney
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Phillips A, Borry P, Van Hoyweghen I, Vears DF. Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents. Genet Med 2021; 23:2038-2046. [PMID: 34234303 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Findings from genomic sequencing can have important implications for patients and family members. Yet, when a patient does not consent to the disclosure of genetic information to relatives, it is unclear how health-care professionals (HCPs) should balance their responsibilities toward patients and their family members and whether breaches in confidentiality are warranted. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of normative documents to understand how HCPs should discuss and facilitate family disclosure, and what should be done in cases where the patient does not consent to disclosure. RESULTS We analyzed 35 documents from advisory committees at the national, European, and international level. We identified discrepancies regarding the recommended role of HCPs in disclosure. While almost all normative documents supported the disclosure of genetic information without patient consent in limited conditions, the conditions for disclosure were often not well defined. Documents provided varying degrees of information regarding what actions HCPs must take in such situations. CONCLUSION Our findings present concerns regarding the ability of these normative documents to guide HCPs' decision making around the disclosure of genetic information to family members. Clearer guidance outlining the responsibilities and acceptability of disclosure is necessary to facilitate disclosure of genetic information to family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amicia Phillips
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Pascal Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ine Van Hoyweghen
- Life Sciences and Society Lab, Center for Sociological Research, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Medical imaging is predominantly a visual field. In this context, prenatal ultrasound images assume intense social, ethical, and psychological significance by virtue of the subject they represent: the fetus. This feature, along with the sophistication introduced by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging that allows improved visualization of the fetus, has contributed to the common impression that prenatal ultrasound scans are like photographs of the fetus. In this article we discuss the consistency of such a comparison. First, we investigate the epistemic role of both analogic and digital photographic images as visual information-providing representations holding a high degree of objectivity. Second, we examine the structure and process of production of ultrasound scans and argue that a comparison between two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound and photography is justified. This is in contrast to 3D ultrasound images that, due to the intensive mathematical processing involved in their production, present some structural issues that obfuscate their ontological and epistemic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Murtagh MJ. Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review. Per Med 2021; 18:295-310. [PMID: 33822658 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
There has been little discussion of the way genomic research results should be returned and how to obtain informed consent for this. We systematically searched the empirical literature, identifying 63 articles exploring stakeholder perspectives on processes for obtaining informed consent about return of results and/or result delivery. Participants, patients and members of the public generally felt they should choose which results are returned to them and how, ranging from direct (face-to-face, telephone) to indirect (letters, emails, web-based delivery) communication. Professionals identified inadequacies in result delivery processes in the research context. Our findings have important implications for ensuring participants are supported in deciding which results they wish to receive or, if no choice is offered, preparing them for potential research outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3052, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville 3052, Australia.,Center for Biomedical Ethics & Law, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics & Society, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Joel T Minion
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Stephanie J Roberts
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - James Cummings
- School of Art, Media & American Studies, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Mavis Machirori
- School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Madeleine J Murtagh
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.,School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vears DF, Elferink M, Kriek M, Borry P, van Gassen KL. Analysis of laboratory reporting practices using a quality assessment of a virtual patient. Genet Med 2020; 23:562-570. [PMID: 33122805 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01015-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Existing research suggests that while some laboratories report variants of uncertain significance, unsolicited findings (UF), and/or secondary findings (SF) when performing exome sequencing, others do not. METHODS To investigate reporting differences, we created virtual patient-parent trio data by merging variants from patients into "normal" exomes. We invited laboratories worldwide to analyze the data along with patient phenotype information (developmental delay, dysmorphic features, and cardiac hypertrophy). Laboratories issued a diagnostic exome report and completed questionnaires to explain their rationale for reporting (or not reporting) each of the eight variants integrated. RESULTS Of the 39 laboratories that completed the questionnaire, 30 reported the HDAC8 variant, which was a partial cause of the patient's primary phenotype, and 26 reported the BICD2 variant, which explained another phenotypic component. Lack of reporting was often due to using a filter or a targeted gene panel that excluded the variant, or because they did not consider the variant to be responsible for the phenotype. There was considerable variation in reporting variants associated with the cardiac phenotype (MYBPC3 and PLN) and reporting UF/SF also varied widely. CONCLUSION This high degree of variability has significant impact on whether causative variants are identified, with important implications for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia. .,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia. .,Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Martin Elferink
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Kriek
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen L van Gassen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vears DF, Borry P, Savulescu J, Koplin JJ. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 12:12-23. [PMID: 33017265 PMCID: PMC8120994 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background While integrating genomic sequencing into clinical care carries clear medical benefits, it also raises difficult ethical questions. Compared to traditional sequencing technologies, genomic sequencing and analysis is more likely to identify unsolicited findings (UF) and variants that cannot be classified as benign or disease-causing (variants of uncertain significance; VUS). UF and VUS pose new challenges for genetic health professionals (GHPs) who are obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing from patients. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 GHPs across Europe, Australia and Canada to identify some of these challenges. Results Our results show that GHPs find it difficult to prepare patients to receive results because a vast amount of information is required to fully inform patients about VUS and UF. GHPs also struggle to engage patients – many of whom may be focused on ending their ‘diagnostic odyssey’ – in the informed consent process in a meaningful way. Thus, some questioned how ‘informed’ patients actually are when they agree to undergo clinical genomic sequencing. Conclusions These findings suggest a tension remains between sufficient information provision at the risk of overwhelming the patient and imparting less information at the risk of uninformed decision-making. We suggest that a shift away from ‘fully informed consent’ toward an approach aimed at realizing, as far as possible, the underlying goals that informed consent is meant to promote.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julian J Koplin
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Phillips A, Vears DF, Van Hoyweghen I, Kuiper J, Borry P. Digital tools for sharing genetic information with family members. Lancet Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30106-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
31
|
Koplin JJ, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:11. [PMID: 32005225 PMCID: PMC6995186 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-0449-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic research can reveal ‘unsolicited’ or ‘incidental’ findings that are of potential health or reproductive significance to participants. It is widely thought that researchers have a moral obligation, grounded in the duty of easy rescue, to return certain kinds of unsolicited findings to research participants. It is less widely thought that researchers have a moral obligation to actively look for health-related findings (for example, by conducting additional analyses to search for findings outside the scope of the research question). Main text This paper examines whether there is a moral obligation, grounded in the duty of easy rescue, to actively hunt for genomic secondary findings. We begin by showing how the duty to disclose individual research findings can be grounded in the duty of easy rescue. Next, we describe a parallel moral duty, also grounded in the duty of easy rescue, to actively hunt for such information. We then consider six possible objections to our argument, each of which we find unsuccessful. Some of these objections provide reason to limit the scope of the duty to look for secondary findings, but none provide reason to reject this duty outright. Conclusions We argue that under a certain range of circumstances, researchers are morally required to hunt for these kinds of secondary findings. Although these circumstances may not currently obtain, genomic researchers will likely acquire an obligation to hunt for secondary findings as the field of genomics continues to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian J Koplin
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. .,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Danya F Vears
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vears DF, Sénécal K, Borry P. Genetic health professionals' experiences returning results from diagnostic genomic sequencing to patients. J Genet Couns 2019; 29:807-815. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F. Vears
- Melbourne Law School University of Melbourne Carlton Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Vic. Australia
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law KU Leuven Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society Leuven Belgium
| | - Karine Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy McGill University Montreal QC Canada
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law KU Leuven Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Middleton A, Milne R, Howard H, Niemiec E, Robarts L, Critchley C, Nicol D, Prainsack B, Atutornu J, Vears DF, Smith J, Steed C, Bevan P, Scott ER, Bobe J, Goodhand P, Kleiderman E, Thorogood A, Morley KI. Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 28:424-434. [PMID: 31784701 PMCID: PMC7080803 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0550-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Public acceptance is critical for sharing of genomic data at scale. This paper examines how acceptance of data sharing pertains to the perceived similarities and differences between DNA and other forms of personal data. It explores the perceptions of representative publics from the USA, Canada, the UK and Australia (n = 8967) towards the donation of DNA and health data. Fifty-two percent of this public held ‘exceptionalist’ views about genetics (i.e., believed DNA is different or ‘special’ compared to other types of medical information). This group was more likely to be familiar with or have had personal experience with genomics and to perceive DNA information as having personal as well as clinical and scientific value. Those with personal experience with genetics and genetic exceptionalist views were nearly six times more likely to be willing to donate their anonymous DNA and medical information for research than other respondents. Perceived harms from re-identification did not appear to dissuade publics from being willing to participate in research. The interplay between exceptionalist views about genetics and the personal, scientific and clinical value attributed to data would be a valuable focus for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK. .,Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.,Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Heidi Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emilia Niemiec
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lauren Robarts
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Christine Critchley
- Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, & Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jerome Atutornu
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.,Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,School of Health Sciences, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society (LIGAS), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - James Smith
- Web Team, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Steed
- Web Team, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Bevan
- Web Team, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erick R Scott
- Department of Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Bobe
- Department of Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Institute for Next Generation Healthcare, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Goodhand
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Katherine I Morley
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vears DF, Sénécal K, Borry P. Exploration of genetic health professional - laboratory specialist interactions in diagnostic genomic sequencing. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 63:103749. [PMID: 31472303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Like any new technology, rapid integration of genomic sequencing (GS) into the clinical setting can pose challenges for genetic health professionals (GHPs) using it to diagnose patients. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors across Europe, Australia and Canada to gain a better understanding of the issues they were experiencing when requesting GS and receiving reports from laboratories. There was a spectrum of interactions between genetic health professionals and laboratories. This ranged from those that almost exclusively request sequencing from the laboratory that is affiliated with their genetic service, to those who do not have access to exome sequencing 'in-house' and instead send patient samples to a selection of different external laboratories. In general, a closer interaction between the clinicians and the laboratory scientists increased the involvement of the clinicians in the analysis/interpretation process. This appeared to lead to fewer, but more clinically relevant variants being reported, and greater GHP satisfaction in what is reported. Our findings suggest that GHPs consider integration of clinical expertise into the analysis/interpretation process is critical to ensure that the variants reported are of high clinical significance to patients. They also highlight the importance of providing GHPs with training in report interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Karine Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pascal Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Isidor B, Julia S, Saugier-Veber P, Weil-Dubuc PL, Bézieau S, Bieth E, Bonnefont JP, Munnich A, Bourdeaut F, Bourgain C, Chassaing N, Corradini N, Haye D, Plaisancie J, Dupin-Deguine D, Calvas P, Mignot C, Cogné B, Manouvrier S, Pasquier L, Héron D, Boycott KM, Turrini M, Vears DF, Nizon M, Vincent M. Searching for secondary findings: considering actionability and preserving the right not to know. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:1481-1484. [PMID: 31186543 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0438-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Isidor
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France.
| | - Sophie Julia
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascale Saugier-Veber
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76000, Rouen, France.,Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Paul-Loup Weil-Dubuc
- Espace éthique Ile-de-France, Laboratoire d'excellence Distalz, Université Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Stéphane Bézieau
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Bieth
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Paul Bonnefont
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Arnold Munnich
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Catherine Bourgain
- Cermes3 (Centre de recherche médecine, sciences, santé, santé mentale, société), Inserm U988, site CNRS, 7 rue Guy Môquet, 94801, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Chassaing
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Nadège Corradini
- Institut d'hémato-oncologie pédiatrique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Damien Haye
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Julie Plaisancie
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Dupin-Deguine
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France.,Service d'otoneurologie et ORL pédiatrique, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrick Calvas
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Cyril Mignot
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Cogné
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Sylvie Manouvrier
- Clinique de génétique, CHU de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.,EA7364 Faculté de Médecine Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- CHU Rennes, Service de Génétique Clinique, 16 Boulevard de Bulgarie, 35203, Rennes, France
| | - Delphine Héron
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kym M Boycott
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mauro Turrini
- DCS- Droit et Changement Social Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Danya F Vears
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Mathilde Nizon
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Vincent
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Berkovic SF, Oliver KL, Canafoglia L, Krieger P, Damiano JA, Hildebrand MS, Morbin M, Vears DF, Sofia V, Giuliano L, Garavaglia B, Simonati A, Santorelli FM, Gambardella A, Labate A, Belcastro V, Castellotti B, Ozkara C, Zeman A, Rankin J, Mole SE, Aguglia U, Farrell M, Rajagopalan S, McDougall A, Brammah S, Andermann F, Andermann E, Dahl HHM, Franceschetti S, Carpenter S. Kufs disease due to mutation ofCLN6: clinical, pathological and molecular genetic features. Brain 2018; 142:59-69. [DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel F Berkovic
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen L Oliver
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Canafoglia
- Department of Neurophysiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Penina Krieger
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - John A Damiano
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hildebrand
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michela Morbin
- Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Danya F Vears
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vito Sofia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia”, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Loretta Giuliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia”, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Barbara Garavaglia
- Medical Genetics and Neurogenetics Unit, Bicocca Laboratories, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta”, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Simonati
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, Movement-Neurology and Neuropathology, Policlinico GB Rossi, P.le LA Scuro, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Gambardella
- Institute of Neurology, University Magna Græcia Catanzaro, Italy; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology of the National Research Council (IBFM-CNR) Germaneto, CZ, Italy
| | - Angelo Labate
- Institute of Neurology, University Magna Græcia Catanzaro, Italy; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology of the National Research Council (IBFM-CNR) Germaneto, CZ, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Castellotti
- Unit Genetics of Neurodegenerative and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Foundation C. Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cigdem Ozkara
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Medical Faculty, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adam Zeman
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Julia Rankin
- Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Gladstone Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Sara E Mole
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology and UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Umberto Aguglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Græcia Catanzaro, Italy
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology of the National Research Council (IBFM-CNR) Germaneto, CZ, Italy
| | - Michael Farrell
- Department of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Sulekha Rajagopalan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales Australia
| | - Alan McDougall
- Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales Australia
| | - Susan Brammah
- Central Sydney Electron Microscope Unit, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frederick Andermann
- Epilepsy Research Group, Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Paediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eva Andermann
- Epilepsy Research Group, Montreal Neurological Hospital and Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Paediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hans-Henrik M Dahl
- Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Silvana Franceschetti
- Department of Neurophysiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Stirling Carpenter
- Consultant in Neuropathology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Davit Chokoshvili
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vears DF, Niemiec E, Howard HC, Borry P. How do consent forms for diagnostic high-throughput sequencing address unsolicited and secondary findings? A content analysis. Clin Genet 2018; 94:321-329. [PMID: 29888485 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Whole exome and whole genome sequencing are increasingly being offered to patients in the clinical setting. Yet, the question of whether, and to what extent, unsolicited findings (UF) and/or secondary findings (SF) should be returned to patients remains open and little is known about how diagnostic consent forms address this issue. We systematically identified consent forms for diagnostic genomic sequencing online and used inductive content analysis to determine if and how they discuss reporting of UF and SF, and whether patients are given options regarding the return of these results. Fifty-four forms representing 38 laboratories/clinics were analyzed. A quarter of the forms did not mention UF or SF. Forms used a variety of terms to discuss UF and SF, sometimes using these interchangeably or incorrectly. Reporting policies for UF varied: 5 forms stated that UF will not be returned, 15 indicated UF may be returned, and 28 did not specify their policy. One-third indicated their laboratory returns SF. Addressing inconsistent terminology and providing sufficient information about UF/SF in consent forms will increase patient understanding and help ensure adequate informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Vears
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Niemiec
- Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctoral (PhD) Degree Programme in Law, Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Law, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.,Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - H C Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - P Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rahimzadeh V, Schickhardt C, Knoppers BM, Sénécal K, Vears DF, Fernandez CV, Pfister S, Plon S, Terry S, Williams J, Williams MS, Cornel M, Friedman JM. Key Implications of Data Sharing in Pediatric Genomics. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172:476-481. [PMID: 29554172 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Accurate clinical interpretation of children's whole-genome and whole-exome sequences relies on comparing the patient's linked genomic and phenotypic data with variant reference databases of both healthy and affected patients. The robustness of such comparisons, in turn, is made possible by sharing pediatric genomic and associated clinical data. Despite this, sparse ethical-legal policy attention has been paid to making such sharing routine in practice. The interdisciplinary Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health considered in detail the current ethical, legal, and social implications of sharing genomic and associated clinical data involving children. An initial set of points to consider was presented at a meeting of the Paediatric Task Team at the 4th Plenary of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. The Key Implications for Data Sharing (KIDS) framework for pediatric genomics was developed based on feedback from this group and was supplemented by findings from a critical appraisal of the data-sharing literature. The final points to consider that comprise the KIDS framework are categorized into the following 4 primary themes: children's involvement, parental consent, balancing benefits and risks, and data protection and release requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christoph Schickhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Programme for Ethics and Patient-Oriented Care in Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Germany
| | - Bartha M Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Conrad V Fernandez
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, IWK HealthCentre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Stefan Pfister
- Pediatric Neurooncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sharon Plon
- Cancer Genetics and Genomics Program, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Janet Williams
- Geisinger Health, Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Marc S Williams
- Geisinger Health, Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Martina Cornel
- Clinical Genetics/EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Medical Genetics Research Unit, Children's & Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Niemiec E, Vears DF, Borry P, Howard HC. Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing. J Community Genet 2018; 9:143-151. [PMID: 28856579 PMCID: PMC5849699 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0324-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing (WES, WGS) can generate an unprecedented amount of complex information, making the informed consent (IC) process challenging. The aim of our study was to assess the readability of English IC forms for clinical whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing using the SMOG and Flesch-Kincaid formulas. We analysed 36 forms, most of which were from US providers. The median readability grade levels were 14.75 (the SMOG formula) and 12.2 (the Flesch-Kincaid formula); these values indicate the years of education after which a person would be able to understand a text studied. All forms studied seem to fail to meet the average recommended readability grade level of 8 (e.g. by Institutional Review Boards of US medical schools) for IC forms, indicating that the content of the forms may not be comprehensible to many patients. The sections aimed at health care professionals (HCPs) in the forms indicate that HCPs should be responsible for explaining IC information to the patients. However, WES and WGS may be increasingly offered by primary care professionals who may not (yet) have sufficient training to be able to communicate effectively with patients about genomics. Therefore, to secure an adequate, truly informed consent process, the task of developing good, legible examples of IC forms along with educating HCPs in genomics should be taken seriously, and adequate resources should be allocated to enable these tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Niemiec
- Erasmus Mundus Joint International Doctoral (Ph.D.) Degree Programme in Law, Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Via Galliera 3, 40121, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of Law, University of Turin, Lungo Dora Siena 100 A, 10153, Turin, Italy.
- Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Leibniz University Hannover, Am Klagesmarkt 14-17, 30159, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heidi Carmen Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box564, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The article [Title], written by [AuthorNames], was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on [date of OnlineFirst publication] without open access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Manzini
- Neuroscience, Ethics & Society Team, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Ln, Oxford, OX3 7JX UK
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Manzini A, Vears DF. Predictive Psychiatric Genetic Testing in Minors: An Exploration of the Non-Medical Benefits. J Bioeth Inq 2018; 15:111-120. [PMID: 29230699 PMCID: PMC5897476 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9828-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to psychiatric conditions is likely to become part of standard practice. Because the onset of most psychiatric diseases is in late adolescence or early adulthood, testing minors could lead to early identification that may prevent or delay the development of these disorders. However, due to their complex aetiology, psychiatric genetic testing does not provide the immediate medical benefits that current guidelines require for testing minors. While several authors have argued non-medical benefits may play a crucial role in favour of predictive testing for other conditions, little research has explored such a role in psychiatric disorders. This paper outlines the potential non-medical benefits and harms of psychiatric genetic testing in minors in order to consider whether the non-medical benefits could ever make such testing appropriate. Five non-medical themes arise in the literature: psychological impacts, autonomy/self-determination, implications of the biomedical approach, use of financial and intellectual resources, and discrimination. Non-medical benefits were prominent in all of them, suggesting that psychiatric genetic testing in minors may be appropriate in some circumstances. Further research needs to empirically assess these potential non-medical benefits, incorporate minors in the debate, and include normative reflection to evaluate the very purposes and motivations of psychiatric genetic testing in minors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Manzini
- Neuroscience, Ethics & Society Team, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Ln, Oxford, OX3 7JX UK
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vears DF, Sénécal K, Clarke AJ, Jackson L, Laberge AM, Lovrecic L, Piton A, Van Gassen KLI, Yntema HG, Knoppers BM, Borry P. Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:36-43. [PMID: 29184171 PMCID: PMC5839050 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0043-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Although NGS technologies are well-embedded in the clinical setting for identification of genetic causes of disease, guidelines issued by professional bodies are inconsistent regarding some aspects of reporting results. Most recommendations do not give detailed guidance about whether variants of uncertain significance (VUS) should be reported by laboratory personnel to clinicians, and give conflicting messages regarding whether unsolicited findings (UF) should be reported. There are also differences both in their recommendations regarding whether actively searching for secondary findings (SF) is appropriate, and in the extent to which they address the duty (or lack thereof) to reanalyse variants when new information arises. An interdisciplinary working group considered the current guidelines, their own experiences, and data from a recent qualitative study to develop a set of points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic NGS. These points to consider fall under six categories: (i) Testing approaches and technologies used, (ii) Approaches for VUS; (iii) Approaches for reporting UF, (iv) Approaches regarding SF; (v) Reanalysis of data & re-contact; and vi) Minors. While it is unclear whether uniformity in reporting across all laboratories is desirable, we hope these points to consider will be useful to diagnostic laboratories as they develop their processes for making decisions about reporting VUS and UF from NGS in the diagnostic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - K Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - A J Clarke
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - L Jackson
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - A M Laberge
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Medical Genetics, CHU Sainte-Justine; CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - L Lovrecic
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - A Piton
- Molecular diagnostic laboratory, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France
| | - K L I Van Gassen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H G Yntema
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - B M Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - P Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chokoshvili D, Borry P, Vears DF. A systematic analysis of online marketing materials used by providers of expanded carrier screening. Genet Med 2017; 20:976-984. [PMID: 29240075 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Expanded carrier screening (ECS) for a large number of recessive disorders is available to prospective parents through commercial providers. This study aimed to analyze the content of marketing materials on ECS providers' websites. METHODS To identify providers of ECS tests, we undertook a comprehensive online search, reviewed recent academic literature on commercial carrier screening, and consulted with colleagues familiar with the current ECS landscape. The identified websites were archived in April 2017, and inductive content analysis was performed on website text, brochures and educational materials, and video transcripts. RESULTS We identified 18 ECS providers, including 16 commercial genetic testing companies. Providers typically described ECS as an important family planning tool. The content differed in both the tone used to promote ECS and the accuracy and completeness of the test information provided. We found that most providers offered complimentary genetic counseling to their consumers, although this was often optional, limited to the posttest context, and, in some cases, appeared to be available only to test-positive individuals. CONCLUSION The quality of ECS providers' websites could be improved by offering more complete and accurate information about ECS and their tests. Providers should also ensure that all carrier couples receive posttest genetic counseling to inform their subsequent reproductive decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davit Chokoshvili
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vears DF, Sénécal K, Borry P. Reporting practices for variants of uncertain significance from next generation sequencing technologies. Eur J Med Genet 2017; 60:553-558. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
46
|
Zhang YH, Burgess R, Malone JP, Glubb GC, Helbig KL, Vadlamudi L, Kivity S, Afawi Z, Bleasel A, Grattan-Smith P, Grinton BE, Bellows ST, Vears DF, Damiano JA, Goldberg-Stern H, Korczyn AD, Dibbens LM, Ruzzo EK, Hildebrand MS, Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE. Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus: Refining the spectrum. Neurology 2017; 89:1210-1219. [PMID: 28842445 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Following our original description of generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) in 1997, we analyze the phenotypic spectrum in 409 affected individuals in 60 families (31 new families) and expand the GEFS+ spectrum. METHODS We performed detailed electroclinical phenotyping on all available affected family members. Genetic analysis of known GEFS+ genes was carried out where possible. We compared our phenotypic and genetic data to those published in the literature over the last 19 years. RESULTS We identified new phenotypes within the GEFS+ spectrum: focal seizures without preceding febrile seizures (16/409 [4%]), classic genetic generalized epilepsies (22/409 [5%]), and afebrile generalized tonic-clonic seizures (9/409 [2%]). Febrile seizures remains the most frequent phenotype in GEFS+ (178/409 [44%]), followed by febrile seizures plus (111/409 [27%]). One third (50/163 [31%]) of GEFS+ families tested have a pathogenic variant in a known GEFS+ gene. CONCLUSION As 37/409 (9%) affected individuals have focal epilepsies, we suggest that GEFS+ be renamed genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus rather than generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus. The phenotypic overlap between GEFS+ and the classic generalized epilepsies is considerably greater than first thought. The clinical and molecular data suggest that the 2 major groups of generalized epilepsies share genetic determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Hua Zhang
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rosemary Burgess
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jodie P Malone
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgie C Glubb
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katherine L Helbig
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lata Vadlamudi
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sara Kivity
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zaid Afawi
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Bleasel
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Padraic Grattan-Smith
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bronwyn E Grinton
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Susannah T Bellows
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Danya F Vears
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - John A Damiano
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hadassa Goldberg-Stern
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amos D Korczyn
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leanne M Dibbens
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elizabeth K Ruzzo
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hildebrand
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Samuel F Berkovic
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid E Scheffer
- From the Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Y.-H.Z., R.B., J.P.M., G.C.G., K.L.H., L.V., B.E.G., S.T.B., D.F.V., J.A.D., M.S.H., S.F.B., I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Pediatrics (Y.-H.Z.), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Neurology (L.V.), The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel (S.K., H.G.-S.), Petach Tikvah; Department of Neurology (Z.A.), Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Westmead Hospital (A.B.), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.G.-S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.D.K.), Tel Aviv University, Israel; Women's and Children's Hospital (L.M.D.), University of Adelaide, South Australia; Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics (E.K.R.), Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Paediatrics (I.E.S.), The University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria; and The Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health (I.E.S.), Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Riso B, Tupasela A, Vears DF, Felzmann H, Cockbain J, Loi M, Kongsholm NCH, Zullo S, Rakic V. Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms - which values should be considered? Life Sci Soc Policy 2017; 13:12. [PMID: 28825221 PMCID: PMC5563504 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-017-0060-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Intensified and extensive data production and data storage are characteristics of contemporary western societies. Health data sharing is increasing with the growth of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) platforms devoted to the collection of personal health and genomic data. However, the sensitive and personal nature of health data poses ethical challenges when data is disclosed and shared even if for scientific research purposes.With this in mind, the Science and Values Working Group of the COST Action CHIP ME 'Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives' (IS 1303) identified six core values they considered to be essential for the ethical sharing of health data using ICT platforms. We believe that using this ethical framework will promote respectful scientific practices in order to maintain individuals' trust in research.We use these values to analyse five ICT platforms and explore how emerging data sharing platforms are reconfiguring the data sharing experience from a range of perspectives. We discuss which types of values, rights and responsibilities they entail and enshrine within their philosophy or outlook on what it means to share personal health information. Through this discussion we address issues of the design and the development process of personal health data and patient-oriented infrastructures, as well as new forms of technologically-mediated empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brígida Riso
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Edifício ISCTE, Av. das Forças Armadas, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Aaro Tupasela
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heike Felzmann
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis, Philosophy, School of Humanities, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Michele Loi
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- ETH Zürich, Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Silvia Zullo
- Department of Legal Studies, CIRSFID, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vojin Rakic
- Centre for the Study of Bioethics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Janssens S, Chokoshvili D, Vears DF, De Paepe A, Borry P. Pre- and post-testing counseling considerations for the provision of expanded carrier screening: exploration of European geneticists' views. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18:46. [PMID: 28764782 PMCID: PMC5539885 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0206-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Carrier screening is generally performed with the aim of identifying healthy couples at risk of having a child affected with a monogenic disorder to provide them with reproductive options. Expanded carrier screening (ECS), which provides the opportunity for multiple conditions to be screened in one test, offers a more cost-effective and comprehensive option than screening for single disorders. However, implementation of ECS at a population level would have implications for genetic counseling practice. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with sixteen European clinical and molecular geneticists with expertise in carrier screening to explore their views on the implementation of ECS in the clinical setting. Results Using inductive content analysis, we identified content categories relevant to the pre- and post-test settings. Participants believed ECS would ideally be targeted at couples before pregnancy. There was some disagreement regarding the acceptability of performing ECS in individuals, with several participants actively opposing individual-based screening. In addition, participants discussed the importance of ensuring informed and voluntary participation in ECS, recommending measures to minimize external pressure on prospective parents to undergo testing. A need for adequate counseling to foster informed, autonomous reproductive decision-making and provide support for couples found to be at risk was emphasized. Conclusions Practical challenges in optimizing pre-test education and post-test counseling should not be underestimated and they should be carefully addressed before implementing ECS in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Janssens
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Davit Chokoshvili
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne De Paepe
- Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vears DF, Sénécal K, Borry P. Reporting practices for unsolicited and secondary findings from next-generation sequencing technologies: Perspectives of laboratory personnel. Hum Mutat 2017; 38:905-911. [PMID: 28512758 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
While next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enormous potential to identify genetic causes of disease, the nature of the technology means that it can also identify additional information about the individual receiving sequencing that is unrelated to the original rationale for testing. Reporting these unsolicited findings (UF) to clinicians, and subsequently to patients, could lead to potentially lifesaving interventions. Most international guidelines provide limited specific recommendations as to whether these UF should be reported. Little research has been conducted exploring which of these variants are reported in practice. Twenty-six interviews were conducted with 27 laboratory personnel, representing 24 laboratories in Europe (12), Canada (five), and Australasia (Seven) to explore their reporting practices. There is considerable variation between laboratories in the reporting of UF. While some limit their reporting to findings that are relevant to the clinical question, others report UF to varying degrees. In addition, most laboratory personnel interviewed said that their laboratories do not actively search for secondary findings in disease-causing genes unrelated to the clinical question, such as those suggested by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Our study highlights that laboratories are still grappling with decisions about which UF to report from NGS and are calling for more guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karine Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sénécal K, Thys K, Vears DF, Van Assche K, Knoppers BM, Borry P. Legal approaches regarding health-care decisions involving minors: implications for next-generation sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:658. [PMID: 28406189 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|