Quality of Life in Treating Persistent Neurogenic Dysphagia with Cricopharyngeal Myotomy

Study on dysphagia from 2012 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace

Objectives

This study aims to review the documents on dysphagia, summarize the research direction, analyze the research hot spots and frontiers, report the research trends, and provide new ideas for future development in the field via CiteSpace.

Methods

We retrieved articles on dysphagia published between 2012 and 2021 from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We downloaded the entire data and utilized CiteSpace version 5.8.R3 (64-bit) to analyze the number of publications annually, cited journals, countries, institutions, authors, cited authors, cited references, and keywords. We visualized the data with a knowledge map, collaborative network analysis, cluster analysis, and strongest citation burst analysis.

Results

We obtained 14,007 papers with a continually increasing trend over time. The most productive country and institute in this field were the United States (4,308) and Northwestern University (236), respectively. Dysphagia (5,062) and Laryngoscope (2,812) were the most productive journals, Elizabeth Ward had the highest number of publications (84), and Logeman et al.'s article (centrality: 0.02) was the most referenced. The most common keywords were dysphagia, management, quality of life, deglutition disorder, diagnosis, aspiration, prevalence, children, outcome, and oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Conclusion

This study analyzed the current literature on dysphagia via CiteSpace and identified its research hot spots and frontiers. The prevalent global trends in dysphagia research and the growing public awareness about healthcare and quality of life suggest that research on dysphagia will gain popularity with further breakthroughs.

Experiences and perceptions of stroke patients living with dysphagia: A qualitative meta-synthesis

AIMS

To systematically review and synthesise the findings of qualitative research exploring experiences of dysphagia from stroke patients' perspectives.

BACKGROUND

Poststroke patients with dysphagia are suffering from impaired physical functions and heavy psychological burden, and they are living with compromised quality of life. Through synthesising qualitative studies to fully portrait the experiences of poststroke patients living with dysphagia, we can care better for this population.

DESIGN

A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies reported by following ENTREQ.

REVIEW METHODS

Five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) and three Chinese databases (CNKI, VIP and Wanfang) were searched from inception until January 2021. Qualitative studies were included if they were related to the experiences of poststroke patients with dysphagia. The Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) was used to appraise study quality. Data were synthesised using the Thomas and Harden method thematic and content analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Four analytical themes were identified: life changes after dysphagia, coping with social events, rebuilding a normal life and limited professional services.

CONCLUSIONS

More attention should be given to psychological health and social interaction in poststroke dysphagia patients. Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, should make joint efforts to provide patients with dysphagia-related knowledge and long-term individualised support. To improve the quality of life of dysphagia patients, further research should implement high-quality interventions based on dysphagia experience and clinical treatment.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

These findings outline the changes in poststroke patients with dysphagia. Nurses as the first-line force, should deliver comprehensive and individualised intervention for managing physiological and psychosocial symptoms of patients.