Needlescopic appendectomy

Needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in young patients

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have reported that needlescopic appendectomy (NA) is a safe and effective procedure for appendicitis because of reduced trocar wounds and tissue trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NA in young patients under 40 years of age whose cosmesis matters with appendicitis by comparing it to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database looking for patients under 40 years of age diagnosed with appendicitis who underwent NA or CLA from January 2013 to April 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: the NA group, and the CLA group. Data collected from each group included age, gender, body mass index, preoperative C-reactive protein, emergency or non-emergency settings, operative time, postoperative length of stay, postoperative complications, and pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent NA and 53 patients underwent CLA. The groups were similar in terms of demographic features. Pathological diagnoses were divided into the following categories: catarrhalis (n = 35), phlegmonous (n = 37), and gangrenous (n = 35). No significant difference was noted regarding the distribution of the three groups (P = .4). NA resulted in significantly shorter operative times (P = .0005), and reduced lengths of hospital stay (P = .03) as compared to CLA. There was no significant difference in the number of complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

NA might be an effective surgical technique when performing a laparoscopic appendectomy in young patients with appendicitis.

Needlescopic Appendectomy in Children and Adolescents Using 14G Needles: A New Era

Purpose: We are presenting a new very minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic appendectomy (needlescopic appendectomy [NAP]) in children and adolescents using suture grasper device, epidural needle, and homemade isolated long diathermy probe without any conventional laparoscopic instruments. Patients and Methods: NAP was attempted in 48 patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis at Al-Azhar, Tanta University Hospitals and other allied hospitals during the period from May 2017 to November 2018. The study included patients with acute appendicitis and patients scheduled for interval appendectomy. Exclusion criteria were patients with concealed appendix, patients with appendicular abscess or appendicular mass, patients with acute appendicitis complicated with generalized peritonitis, and patients unfit for laparoscopy. The appendix was brought outside through the umbilical port and the operation was completed extracorporeally. In cases of appendicitis with tethered cecum, the whole procedure was completed intracorporeally. Results: Forty-eight patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis were treated by NAP. They were 36 males and 12 females with a mean age 9 ± 3.7 years (range = 4-15 years). Two cases with concealed appendix and one case with appendicular mass were diagnosed during initial laparoscopy and excluded from the study. Thirty-two cases (71.11%) were completed intracorporeally and 13 cases (28.89%) were completed by extracorporeal NAP. Mean operative time was 33.29 ± 3.95 minutes (range = 27-40 minutes) for intracorporeal NAP and 20.9 ± 7.01 minutes (range = 14-40 minutes) for extracorporeal NAP. Degrees of cosmetic satisfaction of the patients and parents were excellent in 93.33% (N = 42/45 patients), and very good in 6.67% (N = 3/45 patients) of patients. Conclusion: NAP using needles only is a new technique that is very minimally invasive, very cheap, safe, reproducible, and easy to be done with outstanding cosmetic results.

Novel application of the sewing machine principle; a new simplified intracorporeal suturing technique for pediatric inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND

The desire of pediatric surgeon to reduce incision related morbidity and pain while achieving good cosmetic results has recently led to the introduction of single incision pediatric endosurgery [SIPES] and needlescopic surgery. Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying during SIPES remain challenging. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel and simple technique for intracorporeal suturing of the pediatric inguinal hernia after needlescopic disconnection of hernia sac using just needles rather than laparoscopic instruments. It is an imitation of the principles of sewing machine.

METHODS

The first author discussed the idea of the technique with the coauthors and a demonstration was done on a Silicon Pad before application of the technique on children with congenital inguinal hernia [CIH] for peritoneum closure after needlescopic disconnection of the hernia sac. The main outcome measures were feasibility of the technique, suturing and knotting time and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

The sutures were snugly applied to the ridges of Silicon Pad with good approximation and the knot was firmly tightened in all experiments. After applying and mastering the technique on a Silicon Pad, we shifted to use it on 373 children with 491 hernia defects. All operations were completed by the needlescopic technique without the need for insertion of any laparoscopic instruments. The time required for suturing of the peritoneum around internal inguinal ring [IIR] and knot tying, decreased considerably from 6 min 27 s in the first operation to less than 4 min after the fifth operation and stabilized at approximately 4 min 30 s. No major intraoperative complication. There was no recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 19.6 ± 1.2 months.

CONCLUSION

The closure of the peritoneum around the IIR using needles mimicking what is happening in sewing machine suturing is a feasible, safe and effective line of treatment of children with CIH. The cosmetic results are 42 outstanding without any recurrence.

Needlescopic assisted internal ring suturing; a novel application of low-cost home-made instruments for pediatric inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Congenital inguinal hernia (CIH) is a commonly performed surgical procedure in infants and children. Single port laparoscopic hernia repair using percutaneous internal inguinal ring (IIR) suturing procedure is a widely employed technique for indirect inguinal hernia repair in children. The majority of extracorporeal techniques use extracorporeal knotting and burying the knot subcutaneously. This may result in many drawbacks. The aim of this multicenter study is to introduce a new technique for pediatric inguinal hernia repair using only needles without any laparoscopic instruments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a multicenter study which was conducted at Pediatric Surgical Departments of Al-Azhar, Mansoura, Alexandria and Tanta Universities during the period from January 2015 to June 2017. 314 patients with CIH underwent Needlescopic Assisted Internal Ring Suturing (NAIRS) after cauterization of the hernia sac at its neck. The main outcome measures were: feasibility, safety of the technique, operative time, recurrence rate, hydrocele and cosmetic results.

RESULTS

A total of 314 patients with CIH were corrected by NAIRS. They were 232 males and 82 females. The mean age was 28.12 ± 1.3 months (range 6-120 months). The mean operative time was 12.6 ± 1.7 min (range 8-15 min) for unilateral cases and 18.6 ± 1.7 min (range 14-20 min) for the bilateral repairs. All cases were completed laparoscopically without major intraoperative complications. No recurrence was detected in this study. No wound complications or umbilical hernias developed. Hydrocele occurred in five males (2.16%), without detection of testicular atrophy or iatrogenic ascent of the testis.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study showed that NAIRS after cauterization of the neck of the hernia sac in infants and children is safe, feasible, reproducible with excellent cosmetic results.

Needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer ~a comparative study~

Objectives: This study set out to determine whether Needlescopic surgery (NS) produces comparable surgical outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPS). Methods: We used the five-port method with a 3.5 cm umbilical incision for extraction and reconstruction during MPS for CRC. One or two 5 mm ports were exchanged for needle forceps and all surgical procedures were as for previous MPS since July 2012. We investigated the short-term outcomes of 138 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of CRC by NS (July 2012-August 2014) and 130 consecutive patients with CRC treated with MPS during a previous period (January 2010-June 2012). Results: Operative time in the NS group was comparable to that of MPS (p=0.467); the NS group had significantly less estimated blood loss (p=0.002) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (p<0.001). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 27 in both groups (p=0.730). No mortality occurred in either group, and similar morbidity rates were observed (p=0.454). Conclusions: NS using Endo Relief needle forceps is a safe and feasible option compared to conventional MPS for CRC.

Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy

AIM OF THE STUDY

The perfect balance between safety, cosmesis, and cost effectiveness in a world with ever growing healthcare costs has yet to be found for nonperforated appendicitis. The aim is to present our data regarding safety and cost effectiveness of the transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all laparoscopic appendectomies for acute appendicitis from October 2014 to October 2016. All cases of perforated appendicitis were excluded (visible hole/abscess/free pus). Included cases were divided into two groups by operative technique: transumbilical (TU) or laparoscopic 3-port (L3P). Operating room charges were billed in 30-min intervals, and hospital charges billed per night in-house. The technique was that the appendix is identified with the laparoscope, grabbed with a grasper that is inserted parallel to the laparoscope, and exteriorized through the umbilicus. The appendectomy is completed extracorporeally.

RESULTS

A total of 494 cases of nonperforated appendicitis were included in the study. One surgeon attempted all cases with the TU technique (n=161), and all other surgeons used the L3P technique (n=333), which required an endostapler and a vascular sealing device. The TU technique was successful in 99 of the attempted cases. The mean operative time of the TU cases and the L3P cases was 21 (8-43) and 37 (12-73) min, respectively (P<0.001). The mean hospital stay for the TU and the L3P cases was 1.6 (1-5) days (one-night admission) and 2.4 (1-14) days (two-night admission), respectively (P<0.001). There were no operative complications or readmissions in either group. The overall cost of the L3P cases was 30% higher than the cost of the TU cases.

CONCLUSION

The transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted technique was as safe as the laparoscopic 3-port technique. It offered all the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure, was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay, and was remarkably more cost effective than the standard laparoscopic 3-port technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

In this modern era of minimally invasive surgery, cosmesis and early recovery are strongly emphasized. To reduce abdominal trauma and improve cosmesis, surgeons have adopted a single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

From August to December 2008, 43 cases of appendectomy were managed using the single-port transumbilical laparoscopic technique. A multichannel single port was created using a surgical glove (no. 6), three trocars, one-three-way catheter, and a wound retractor (Alexis). An umbilical incision (1.5-2.0 cm) was made transumbilically or infraumbilically. The intraabdominal procedures were almost identical to those for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The methods for mesenteric dissection and appendiceal stump ligation were identical. Despite slight discomforts with retraction and visualization, the procedure was nevertheless possible. A resected appendix was put into a finger of the single-port glove.

RESULTS

The 43 study cases included 23 men and 20 women with a mean age of 31 years (range, 9-65 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 22.3 kg/m(2) (range 15-29.7 kg/m(2)). The mean operative time was 61.3 min (range 24-120 min). Drainage was used in two cases with perforated appendicitis. Bowel movement returned at a mean of 1.2 days, and oral feeding was resumed on postoperative day 1.2. The pathology showed negative inflammation in 4 cases (9.3%), suppurative appendicitis in 29 cases (67.4%), gangrenous appendicitis in 8 cases (18.6%), and perforated appendicitis in 2 cases. Only one patient required readmission due to pericecal inflammation and pain, and another patient needed a percutaneous drainage of fluid collection. Three minor umbilical wound complications were controlled conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port appendectomy may require a longer operative time than laparoscopic appendectomy, but it is a feasible technique with good cosmetic results. It could be one of the alternative methods for treating acute appendicitis.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using needlescopic instruments for adrenal tumors less than 5cm in 112 cases

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adrenalectomy with needlescopic instruments for most adrenal tumors less than 5cm.

METHODS

Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with needlescopic instruments for 112 patients with presumptively benign adrenal tumors < 5cm were enrolled from July 2000 to February 2005. Operative time, blood loss, conversion and complication rates, and postoperative data were analyzed by appropriate statistical methods.

RESULTS

All 112 operations were completed without any mortality or reoperation. Mean operative time was 151min and mean blood loss was 30ml. Only one patient required a blood transfusion and application of a hand-assisted device. Conversion to conventional laparoscopic instruments was necessary in another five patients (4.5%). The operative time of the latter 100 cases (147+/-5.1min, mean+/-standard error of mean) was significantly shorter than that of the initial 12 cases (183+/-8.8min, p=0.001). Larger tumors, previous abdominal surgery, and pheochromocytoma group were independent risk factors of a longer operative time. Except for one leiomyosarcoma, all other tumors were benign adrenal pathologies (57 aldosterone-producing adenomas, 23 Cushing's adenomas, 12 pheochromocytomas, and 20 incidentalomas).

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adrenalectomy employing needlescopic instruments for most adrenal tumors less than 5cm was feasible with acceptable operative time. Pheochromocytomas can also be managed with a longer operative time. Patients with previous upper midline or ipsilateral upper quadrant open surgery might not be suitable candidates for such a technique.