Can laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection provide uncomplicated management even in cases of complicated diverticulitis?

Early or delayed sigmoid resection in complicated diverticular disease? A single-center experience

Background

Diverticular disease appears to be one of the most common conditions in the Western world. The standard approach in treatment of diverticular disease is a laparoscopic resection, usually after an inflammation-free time of 4 to 6 weeks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the timing of operation.

Materials and methods

A total of 61 patients underwent left-sided colonic resection because of diverticular disease between January 2017 and February 2020. Because of complicated diverticulitis (CDD stage 2a or 2b) 37 patients were treated either early within 7 days after first symptoms (group A: n = 17) or delayed about 6 weeks after the first contact and conservative therapy (group B: n = 20).

Results

Overall mortality was 0%. The average operation time was shorter in the early elective group (group A: 140.4 min vs. group B: 151.2 min; p = 0.29). The hospital stay (group A: 9.9 days vs. group B: 16.9 days) and the postoperative stay (group A: 4.8 days vs. group B: 8.1 days) were significantly longer in group B (p = 0.01). We observed—although not reliable due to the low number of patients—more postoperative complications in the delayed group (group A: 5.9% vs. group B: 15.0%; p = 0.61).

Conclusion

The data in this study confirm the early operation as safe and efficient due to lower costs. We can recommend an early approach in selected cases with the first episode of a complicated diverticulitis.

Elective vs. early elective surgery in diverticular disease: a retrospective study on the optimal timing of non-emergency treatment

PURPOSE

This study set out to compare the in-hospital outcomes of early elective and elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy due to diverticulitis.

METHODS

We examined the data for 378 diverticulitis patients who received an elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection between 2008 and 2012. We divided the patients into two groups: elective (group A, n = 278) and early elective (group B, n = 100). Patients in group A received surgery during the inflammation-free interval, and those in group B immediately after treating the attack with IV antibiotics for a mean period of 8 days (IQR = 3).

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 0%. The mean operation duration was the same in both groups being 77.5 and 80 min respectively. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between the two groups, measured using the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complication (CCSC; p = 0.992). A revision due to complications was necessary in 16 cases (group A) and six cases (group B) (p = 0.820). The conversion rate to open surgery was low (six individuals in group A, vs. four in group B; p = 0.331). Patients in group B suffered significantly fewer diverticulitis attacks (three in group A, vs. two in group B; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no difference in outcome between elective and early elective cases. Operation durations were optimal in both cases and were 50% shorter than those recorded in the literature. An early elective operation represents a good treatment option, especially for patients suffering from complicated diverticulitis.

Complicated diverticular disease: Position statement on outpatient management, Hartmann's procedure, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and laparoscopic approach. Consensus document of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology and the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons

The Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) and the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), propose this consensus document about complicated diverticular disease that could be used for decision-making. Outpatient management, Hartmann's procedure, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, and the role of a laparoscopic approach in colonic resection are exposed.

Mortality and complications following surgery for diverticulitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of diverticulitis is in a state of evolution. Clinicians across many disciplines need to counsel patients regarding surgical choices.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the mortality and complication rates following surgery for diverticulitis in both the emergent and elective setting.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published from 1980 to 2012. The primary outcome of interest was the point estimate of mortality, following surgery for diverticulitis.

RESULTS

Of the 289 citations reviewed, we included 59 studies. Overall, the point estimate for mortality was 3.05%, with a 95% confidence intereval (CI) of 1.73-5.32 and p < 0.001. Mortality following emergent surgery was 10.64% (95% CI 7.95-14.11; p < 0.001), versus 0.50% (95% CI 0.46-0.54; p < 0.001) following elective operations. A laparoscopic approach had an estimated mortality of 0.75% (95% CI 0.35-1.58; p < 0.001), compared to an open surgical approach, which had a mortality of 4.69% (95% CI 2.29-9.36, p < 0.001). The mortality following a resection with primary anastomosis was 1.96% (95% CI 1.22-3.13; p < 0.001) and for the Hartmann's procedure was 14.18% (95% CI 9.83-20.03; p < 0.001). A comparative analysis found that the risk of post-operative mortality was significantly higher following emergent surgery, compared to elective surgery (odds ratio (OR): 6.12 with 95% CI 1.62-23.10; p = 0.008; Q = 2.56, p = 0.46 and I2 = 0); the open approach, compared to a laparoscopic approach (OR: 36.43 with 95% CI 9.94-133.6; p = 0.13; and Q = 2.79, p = 0.25 and I2 = 28.26); and for Hartmann's procedure, compared to primary anastomosis without diversion (OR: 25.45 with 95% CI 15.13-42.81, p < 0.001; and Q = 23.34, p = 0.14 and I2 = 27.16). The overall reported post-operative complication rate was 32.64% (95% CI 27.43-38.32; p < 0.00). The overall surgical and medical complication rates were 18.96% and 13.93%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent surgical treatment of diverticulitis has a significant complication rate. Even elective surgery has a significant complication rate that needs to be considered when doing the clinical decision-making for recurrent diverticulitis.

[Treatment of the acute diverticulitis: A systematic review]

Acute diverticulitis is a common disease with increasing incidence. In most of cases, diagnosis is made at an uncomplicated stage offering a curative attempt under medical treatment and use of antibiotics. There is a risk of diverticulitis recurrence. Uncomplicated diverticulitis is opposed to complicated forms (perforation, abscess or fistula). Recent insights in the pathophysiology of diverticulitis, the natural history, and treatments have permitted to identify new treatment strategies. For example, the use of antibiotics tends to decrease; surgery is now less invasive, percutaneous drainage is preferred, peritoneal lavage is encouraged. Treatments of the diverticulitis are constantly evolving. In this review, we remind the pathophysiology and natural history, and summarize new recommendations for the medical and surgical treatment of acute diverticulitis.

The impact of delaying elective resection of diverticulitis on laparoscopic conversion rate

BACKGROUND

Guideline-concordant delay in elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis may result in repeated bouts of inflammation. We aimed to determine whether conversion rates from elective laparoscopic colectomy are higher after multiple episodes of diverticulitis.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study evaluating laparoscopic colectomy conversion rates for diverticulitis from 42 hospitals was conducted.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2013, 1,790 laparoscopic colectomies for diverticulitis (mean age 57.8 ± 13; 47% male) resulted in 295 (16.5%) conversions. Conversion occurred more frequently in nonelective operations (P < .001) and with fistula indications (P = .012). Conversion rates decreased with surgeon case volume (P = .028). Elective colectomy exclusively for episode-based indications (n = 784) had a conversion rate of 12.9%. Increasing episodes of diverticulitis were not associated with higher conversion rates, even among surgeons with similar experience levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis did not increase after multiple episodes of diverticulitis. Delaying elective resection appears to not prevent patients from the benefits of laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistula: experience in 15 cases and review of the literature

Colovesical fistulas secondary to diverticular disease may be considered a contraindication to the laparoscopic approach. The feasibility of laparoscopic management of complicated diverticulitis and mixed diverticular fistulas has been demonstrated. However, few studies on the laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistulas exist. A retrospective analysis was performed of 15 patients with diverticular colovesical fistula, who underwent laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection and bladder repair. Median operating time was 135 minutes and median blood loss, 75 mL. Five patients were converted to an open procedure (33.3%) with an associated increase in hospital stay (P = 0.035). Median time to return of bowel function was 2 days and median length of stay, 6 days. Overall morbidity was 20% with no major complications. There was no mortality. There was no recurrence during median follow-up of 12.4 months. These results suggest that laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistulas is both feasible and safe in the setting of appropriate surgical expertise.

Italian consensus conference for colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease

The statements produced by the Consensus Conference on Diverticular Disease promoted by GRIMAD (Gruppo Italiano Malattia Diverticolare, Italian Group on Diverticular Diseases) are reported. Topics such as epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment of diverticular disease (DD) in patients with uncomplicated and complicated DD were reviewed by a scientific board of experts who proposed 55 statements graded according to level of evidence and strength of recommendation, and approved by an independent jury. Each topic was explored focusing on the more relevant clinical questions. Comparison and discussion of expert opinions, pertinent statements and replies to specific questions, were presented and approved based on a systematic literature search of the available evidence. Comments were added explaining the basis for grading the evidence, particularly for controversial areas.

Surgical outcomes and their relation to the number of prior episodes of diverticulitis

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the relationship between the number of prior episodes of diverticulitis and outcomes of sigmoid colectomy.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was undertaken based on records of patients who underwent sigmoid resection with anastomosis for diverticulitis between 4 May 2007 and 29 February 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: 0-3 attacks (group 1) and ≥4 attacks (group 2). Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether the groups differed on demographic, intra-operative and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

We identified 247 patients who underwent sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis (45 open, 202 laparoscopic). The two groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, past surgical history, body mass index, length of stay, use of a stoma or number of prior hospitalizations for diverticulitis. Group 1 had a higher rate of abscesses (30.6 vs 6.8%, P < 0.001) and fistulas (19.4 vs 0.9%, P < 0.001); a longer operative time (190.1 vs 166.3 min, P = 0.0024); and higher rates of postoperative complications (45.8 vs 23.3%, P < 0.001) and conversion (17.1 vs 4.4%, P = 0.0091). The most common surgical complications in groups 1 and 2 were wound infection (35 vs 10) and ileus (20 vs 8). Based on multivariate regression analysis, ≥4 attacks were independently correlated with a lower complication rate (odds ratio = 0.512, 95% confidence interval = 0.266-0.987, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had ≥4 previous attacks of diverticulitis had fewer postoperative complications.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for diverticular disease is not suitable for the early part of the learning curve. A retrospective cohort study

AIM

We evaluate the challenges of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Retrospective study of elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures (LCP) performed 2002-2011. The study compares LCP for Diverticular disease (S group) with both LCP for other pathology (C1 group) and open procedures for diverticular disease (C2 group). Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, Student "t" test and Mann Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

The study included 194 LCP out of which 22 were in S group. Conversion rate in S group was 27.3% vs 9.9% in C1 group, p = 0.017. The mean operating time was significantly higher in S group (250 min) compared with 196 min in C1 group, p = 0.0004. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days in S group and 4 days in C group, p = 0.12. Both morbidities and mortality rates were not statistically different between the two groups. In the second part of the study we compare LCP with OCP performed for diverticular disease.

CONCLUSION

LCP for Diverticular disease are technically challenging and should be attempted later in the learning curve.

Elective sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a systematic review

AIM

A meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies and one randomized trial was conducted to compare laparoscopic surgery with open surgery in the elective treatment of patients with diverticular disease.

METHOD

Published randomized and controlled clinical trials that directly compared elective open (OSR) with laparoscopic surgical resection (LSR) in patients with diverticular disease were identified using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. End-points included 30-day mortality and morbidity and were compared by determining the relative risk ratio, odds ratio, and the absolute effects.

RESULTS

Eleven nonrandomized studies of 1430 patients were identified and included in the meta-analysis. There was only one randomized study, which included 104 patients. The meta-analysis suggested that elective LSR was a safe and appropriate option for patients with diverticular disease and was associated with lower overall morbidity (P = 0.01) and minor complication rate (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The results of the nonrandomized study generally agreed with those of the randomized study, except for the incidence of minor complications, which was higher in both the LSR and OSR groups of the randomized study. In this study, the high overall morbidity of 42.3% reported in the LSR group is a cause for concern.

[Perforation risk and patient age. Risk analysis in acute sigmoid diverticulitis]

INTRODUCTION

It is often postulated that younger patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) have an increased risk of perforation which constitutes an indication for early surgery. The aim of this study was to correlate the severity of sigmoid diverticulitis with patient age in order to check the surgical indication in younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with acute SD from January 1998 to June 2009 were included. Two age groups were distinguished: group I (GI) ≤40 years in age and group II (GII) >40 years. The perforation risk associated with first episode SD was determined by multivariate analysis. SD was classified according to Hansen and Stock (H/S).

RESULTS

In the total cohort of 959 patients, including 86 in GI (8.9%) and 873 in GII (91.1%) 468 had a first episode, with 64 in GI (13.7%) and 404 in GII (86.3%). The proportion of first episodes was 74.4% in GI and 46.3% in GII (p<0.001). The perforation risk did not differ (H/S IIb: 29.7% in GI vs. 29.2% in GII, p=0.938; H/S IIc: 25% in GI vs. 25% in GII, p=1). Treatment regimes were (GI vs. GII) emergency operations 25% vs. 25% (p=1), elective operations 17.2% vs. 10% (p=0.096) and conservative treatment 57.8% vs. 64.9% (p=0.276).

CONCLUSION

First episodes of SD were more frequent in younger patients (≤40) and did not involve a higher risk of perforation. The indication for treatment of acute SD should not be based on age but on the severity of inflammation and the individual situation of patients.

Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease

Despite its potential advantages, laparoscopic management of diverticular disease is currently performed by a minority of surgeons on a small group of patients. However, the role for laparoscopy in diverticular disease continues to develop. At present, adequate evidence exists for the routine use of laparoscopy for uncomplicated diverticular disease. Complicated disease, including fistulizing disease and free perforation requires additional expertise and study. As the experience grows among individual surgeons and institutions, it can be expected that the complication and conversion rates will continue to decline allowing even further evolution of laparoscopy for the treatment of this challenging disease process.

Restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure--not a benign operation. Are there predictors for morbidity?

BACKGROUND

Restoration of intestinal continuity is usually the second step after Hartmann's procedure and an established procedure in abdominal surgery, particularly for complicated diverticular disease. This descriptive study aimed to examine the morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure and to define potential risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 161 consecutive patients (median age 62 years, median BMI 25.2) undergoing elective surgery with restoration of bowel continuity between October 2001 and November 2008 at the Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, were included in this study. The association of potential prognostic variables with postoperative morbidity and mortality were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median time between the initial operation and the restoration of bowel continuity was 7 months. The median operation time was 185 min with a blood loss of 150 ml and median postoperative hospital stay of 9 days. Fifty-one percent of the patients had an uneventful recovery, whereas 49% had a postoperative complication. Surgical infections occurred in 18% of patients, 3.8% suffered from anastomotic leakage, and surgical re-exploration was necessary in 11.2%. Medical complications occurred in 21.1% of the patients, with pneumonia in 2.5% and urinary tract infections in 1.3%. One patient died 17 days after surgery. Univariate analysis showed that patients taking immunosuppressant drugs had significantly more wound infections and, interestingly, protective ileostomy was associated with postoperative anastomotic stenosis in our cohort. The administration of PRBC and a prolonged hospital were significantly associated with increased postoperative morbidity in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of bowel continuity is a surgical procedure with high overall morbidity. The high morbidity confirmed in our study and various other papers justify a randomized clinical study to investigate the one-stage concept with primary anastomosis against the Hartmann's procedure and its reversal.

Preoperative CT staging in sigmoid diverticulitis--does it correlate with intraoperative and histological findings?

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate whether the computed tomography (CT) reflects the extent of the inflammation in sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) in order to draw conclusions for selecting the appropriate treatment.

METHODS

Two hundred four patients who underwent resection for SD from January 2003 to December 2008 were included. The preoperative CT stage was compared with intraoperative and histological findings. Patients were classified into phlegmonous (Hansen-Stock IIa), abscess-forming (HS IIb), and free perforated (HS IIc) forms of SD. Patients with a recurrent type of diverticulitis were excluded.

RESULTS

In the phlegmonous type (HS IIa; n = 75), we found a correlation with the preoperative stage in 52% (intraoperative) and 56% (histological), an understaging in 12% (intraoperative) and 11% (histological), and an overstaging in 36% (intraoperative) and 33% (histological). In the abscess-forming type (HS IIb, Hinchey I/II; n = 87), we found conformity in 92% (intraoperative) and 90% (histological), understaging in 3% (intraoperative) and 0% (histological), and overstaging in 5% (intraoperative) and 10% (histological). In the presence of a free perforation (HS IIc, Hinchey III/IV; n = 42), we saw conformity in 100% (intraoperative and histological). The positive predictive value for correctly diagnosing of phlegmonous type (HS IIa), abscess-forming type (HS IIb), and free perforation (HS IIc) by CT was intraoperatively (histologically) 52% (56), 92% (90), and 100% (100), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CT is one of the most accurate methods for staging in SD. However, in the phlegmonous type (HS IIa), it leads to an overestimation of the findings in every third patient. It must be clarified whether this pronounced low inflammation should really be regarded as a complicated form of SD. In contrast, the abscess-forming (HS IIb) and free perforated (HS IIc) type of complicated SD is very well reflected by CT.

Current indications and role of surgery in the management of sigmoid diverticulitis

Sigmoid diverticulitis is a common disease which carries both a significant morbidity and a societal economic burden. This review article analyzes the current data regarding management of sigmoid diverticulitis in its variable clinical presentations. Wide-spectrum antibiotics are the standard of care for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Recently published data indicate that sigmoid diverticulitis does not mandate surgical management after the second episode of uncomplicated disease as previously recommended. Rather, a more individualized approach, taking into account frequency, severity of the attacks and their impact on quality of life, should guide the indication for surgery. On the other hand, complicated diverticular disease still requires surgical treatment in patients with acceptable comorbidity risk and remains a life-threatening condition in the case of free peritoneal perforation. Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly accepted as the surgical approach of choice for most presentations of the disease and has also been proposed in the treatment of generalized peritonitis. There is not sufficient evidence supporting any changes in the approach to management in younger patients. Conversely, the available evidence suggests that surgery should be indicated after one attack of uncomplicated disease in immunocompromised individuals. Uncommon clinical presentations of sigmoid diverticulitis and their possible association with inflammatory bowel disease are also discussed.

[Open appendectomy. When do we still need it?]

Acute appendicitis is the most common emergency visceral surgical procedure in Germany with 130,000 appendectomies. The question of which operational procedure should be used must therefore be discussed at regular intervals. In many centers of minimal invasive surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard procedure. Nearly 30 years after introduction of LA, it is believed that open appendectomy (OA) is needed only on rare occasions, but the actual percentage of OAs carried out in 2006 was 46% of all appendectomies. This high percentage documents that OA is still the standard procedure in many German hospitals. A review of the literature shows that there are still some situations in which OA is superior to LA. Infants younger than 5 years old have a more difficult basic requirement for LA due to the small abdominal cavity, therefore OA is the procedure of choice in most cases. During pregnancy OA has a lower risk for the fetus than LA. Cost analyses show that OA is less expensive for the hospital in material costs, whereas LA is the better economic choice due to an earlier return to work. In summary, there are only marginal differences between the two procedures since both offer a fast patient recovery. Advantages in favor of both LA and OA exist in subgroup analyses and the possible subgroups that can benefit from OA are discussed in this article.

Surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis--analysis of predictive risk factors for postoperative infections, surgical complications, and mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sigmoid diverticular disease has great clinical importance due to its increasing incidence in the Western world and a broad spectrum of clinical features with potential fatal complications after surgery. The definition of risk factors associated with postoperative infections, surgical complications and mortality could be helpful in clinical decision-making and optimizing perioperative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a prospective database, 168 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis were included in this study. The association of different potential risk factors such as age, Hinchey classification, type and duration of operation, surgeons' experience, blood loss, comorbidities, and hospital course with perioperative complications and mortality were tested by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 168 patients enrolled in this study, there were 84 male and 84 female. A third of patients were operated as emergency cases (within 24 h after surgical evaluation); 62% underwent open surgery, 35% were treated laparoscopically with a conversion rate of 3%. A blood transfusion received 14% of patients, a surgical infection occurred in 20%, surgical complications appeared in 24% with a necessity for re-exploration in 9.5%. Leakage of the primary anastomosis was seen in 3.3%, whereas a leakage of the Hartmann's stump occurred in 4.3%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 4.1%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated Hinchey classification and intraoperative blood transfusion to be independently associated with postoperative infections, complications and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Hinchey classification and intraoperative blood transfusion are independently associated with a worse perioperative outcome in patients undergoing surgery for sigmoid diverticular disease. While Hinchey classification cannot be influenced per se by the surgeon, outcome might be influenced by reducing the need for intraoperative blood transfusion.

A single training center's experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes for consecutive patients with diverticular disease who underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

METHODS

Data for this patient population were collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Between December 2001 and March 2007, 200 consecutive patients (93 men and 107 women) with an average age of 55 years were identified. All cases were managed by one of two colorectal surgeons. Of the 200 patients, 158 had recurrent diverticulitis, 20 had fistulas, 12 had abscesses, 8 had strictures, 1 had a mass, and 1 had a bleed. The mean operative time was 159 min, and the conversion rate was 8%. A total of 30 early postoperative complications occurred for 26 patients including wound infection (n = 9), ileus (n = 8), Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), urinary retention (n = 3), pelvic abscess (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1) urinary tract infection (n = 1), anastomotic leak (n = 1), and small bowel obstruction (n = 1). Late complications experienced by 11 patients included Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 3), wound infection (n = 3), wound hematoma (n = 1), and intraabdominal hemorrhage (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe it is feasible to offer elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy to all patients with symptomatic diverticular disease despite preoperative risk factors.