Comparison of intraoperative enteroscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

The Evolution of Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: From Sonde Enteroscopy to Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy

The introduction of capsule endoscopy in 2001 opened the last "black box" of the gastrointestinal tract enabling complete visualization of the small bowel. Since then, numerous new developments in the field of deep enteroscopy have emerged expanding the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium against small bowel diseases. The ability to achieve total enteroscopy and visualize the entire small bowel remains the holy grail in enteroscopy. Our journey in the small bowel started historically with sonde type enteroscopy and ropeway enteroscopy. Currently, double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy, and spiral enteroscopy are available in clinical practice. Recently, a novel motorized enteroscope has been described with the potential to shorten procedure time and allow for total enteroscopy in one session. In this review, we will present an overview of the currently available techniques, indications, diagnostic yield, and complications of device-assisted enteroscopy.

Safety and efficacy of an enteroscopy-based approach in reducing the polyp burden in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: experience from a tertiary referral center

Background:

Patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome develop hamartomatous polyps in the small bowel, possibly causing anemia, intussusception, and obstruction. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an enteroscopy-based approach, including both device-assisted and intraoperative enteroscopy, on the reduction of the polyp burden in a cohort of adult Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients.

Materials and methods:

A retrospective study was conducted at Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza in Turin, Italy. Consecutive Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients eligible for device-assisted or intraoperative enteroscopy, between January 2003 and November 2019, were included. Enteroscopy technical issues and complications were recorded. At the time of index enteroscopy, the patients’ clinical records were retrospectively reviewed, and clinical data were recorded until November 2019.

Results:

Overall, 24 patients were included. Before inclusion, 16/24 patients (66.7%) underwent small bowel surgery for polyp-related complications, 13 of which (81.2%) in an emergent setting. Two patients had a history of small bowel neoplasms. During the timeframe, 47 device-assisted enteroscopies and 9 intraoperative enteroscopies were performed, and 247 small bowel polyps were endoscopically removed. The overall complication rate was 12.8% (8.5% for device-assisted enteroscopy, 22.2% for intraoperative enteroscopy). The median observation time was 108 months: in this timeframe, two patients developed small bowel polyp-related complications requiring emergent surgery. No patients developed small bowel cancer, but nine extra-gastrointestinal neoplasms were recorded.

Conclusion:

An enteroscopy-based approach appears to be well tolerated and effective in decreasing polyp-related complications in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients, thus reducing the need for emergent surgery. Although the prevention of small bowel polyp-related complications remains the main goal in these patients, the high incidence of extra-gastrointestinal neoplasms appears to be a rising issue.

Efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy for small-bowel polypectomy: clinical and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

We evaluated first the feasibility of endoscopic small-bowel polypectomy and second, the economic aspects, by comparing the cost of endoscopic and surgical polyp resection.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicenter study included 494 patients with positive capsule endoscopy (CE) before double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). We selected only CE with at least one polyp. The retrospective economic evaluation compared patients treated by DBE or surgery for small-bowel polypectomy. Hospital readmission because of repeat polyp resection or complication-related interventions was noted. The 1-year cost was estimated from the viewpoint of the healthcare system and included procedures, hospital admissions and follow up.

RESULTS

CE indicated one or more polyps in 62 (12.5%) patients (32 males, 49 ± 5 years), all of whom underwent a successful DBE exploration. The DBE polyp diagnostic yield was 58%. There were no major complications. A total of 26 (42%) patients in the DBE group and 19 (39%) in the control group required hospital readmission. All readmissions in the DBE group were for repeat procedures to remove all polyps, and in the control group, for surgical complications. The total cost of the initial hospitalization (€4014 ± 2239 DBE versus €11,620 ± 7183 surgery, p < 0.0001) and the 1-year total cost (€8438 ± 9227 DBE versus €13,402 ± 7919 surgery, p < 0.0001) were lower in the DBE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic polypectomy was efficient and safe. The total cost at 1 year was less for endoscopy than surgery. DBE should be proposed as the first-line treatment for small-bowel polyp resection.

Familial Colorectal Cancer: Understanding the Alphabet Soup

While most colorectal cancers (CRCs) originate from nonhereditary spontaneous mutations, one-third of cases are familial or hereditary. Hereditary CRCs, which account for < 5% of all CRCs, have identifiable germline mutations and phenotypes, such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Familial CRCs, which account for up to 30% of CRCs, have no identifiable germline mutation or specific pattern of inheritance, but higher-than-expected incidence within a family. Since the discovery that certain genotypes can lead to development of CRC, thousands of mutations have now been implicated in CRC. These new findings have enhanced our ability to identify at-risk patients, initiate better surveillance, and take preventative measures. Given the large number of genes now associated with hereditary and familial CRCs, clinicians should be familiar with the alphabet soup of genes to provide the highest quality of care for patients and families.

The clinical characteristics and treatment of intestinal hamartomas

The study aims to investigate the intestinal (small and large intestine) clinical features and treatment of hamartoma. Nowadays, with the rapid development of new technologies, digestive system endoscopy has been proven to be an effective device for treatment, rather than just a diagnostic tool. Such development plays a revolutionary role in diagnosis and treatment for digestive diseases. And endoscopic treatment was used in this study (LED light source, wavelength 580 ∼ 595 nm, power 200 W). A retrospective analysis of 20 cases of intestinal hamartomas performed from January 2012 to January 2016 to summarize its clinical characteristics and follow-up study on the therapeutic effect of the patients. There were 8 cases for endoscopic operation, and 12 cases for surgical operation. Comparison of tumor size between endoscopic and surgical estimated by using Wilcoxon rank sum test for tumor length (Z = -3.134, p = 0.001), and for tumor diameter (Z = -2.920, p = 0.002). The results of this study showed that intestinal hamartomas and gender have no significant relationship. The incidence of the disease is concentrated under 60 years, the incidence of the small intestine is significantly higher than that of the large intestine, and the rate of misdiagnosis is high. Endoscopic and surgical treatment are the main treatment, the prognosis is good, and after the radical resection, the recurrence was less.

The Usefulness of Capsule Endoscopy for Small Bowel Tumors

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has expanded the range of endoscopic examination of the small bowel. The clinical application of VCE is mainly for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) and small bowel tumor is one of the clinically significant diagnoses of VCE, often requiring subsequent invasive interventions. Small bowel tumors are detected with a frequency of around 4% with VCE in indications of OGIB, iron deficiency anemia, unexplained abdominal pain, and others. Protruding mass with bleeding, mucosal disruption, irregular surface, discolored area, and white villi are suggested as the VCE findings of small bowel tumor. Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE), computed tomography enteroclysis/enterography and magnetic resonance enteroclysis/enterography also have clinical value in small bowel examination and tumor detection, and they can be used with VCE, sequentially or complementarily. Familial adenomatous polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, melanoma, lymphoma, and neuroendocrine tumor with hepatic metastasis are the high risk groups for small bowel tumors, and surveillance programs for small bowel tumors are needed. VCE and radiological imaging have value in screening, and in selected cases, DAE can provide more accurate diagnosis and endoscopic treatment. This review describes the usefulness and clinical impact of VCE on small bowel tumors.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Jejunal Polyps using Double-Balloon Enteroscopy

Background

There are only two single case reports describing double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the jejunum. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of DBE-assisted EMR in patients with familial and non-familial jejunal polyps.

Patients and methods

Observational, open-label, retrospective, single-arm case series in two hospitals.

Results

Eight patients underwent DBE assisted jejunal EMR. Median age of patients was 42 years (range 24–62 years), male: female ratio 1.5:1. DBE was done through the antegrade (i.e. oral) route in all patients. Four patients had FAP; two had Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, one had a sporadic adenoma and one had a bleeding jejunal polyp, which on histological examination turned out to be lipoma. 3/8 underwent piece-meal EMR. No immediate adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

This is the first case series presenting the technical details, feasibility and outcomes of EMR of the small bowel. EMR of the jejunum is feasible and safe during DBE.

Deep enteroscopy - indications, diagnostic yield and complications

Since its introduction in 2001 capsule endoscopy opened up the small bowel for diagnostic approaches followed by double balloon enteroscopy which enabled the endoscopic community to perform therapeutic interventions in the whole small intestine. In this review the scientific developments related to indications, diagnostic yield and complications of the last years between the competing devices double ballon enteroscopy, single balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy are illustrated.

Small intestinal tumours

Objective. Balloon enteroscopy (BE) and capsule enteroscopy (CE) are enteroscopy methods that allow examination and treatment of the small bowel. Before the CE and BE era, the small intestine was difficult to access for investigation. Small intestinal tumours are infrequent conditions, but about half of them are malignant. Materials and Methods. A total of 303 BEs were performed in 179 patients. Oral insertion was performed in 240 and anal in 63 BEs. Indications for the procedure in our patients with small bowel tumours were anaemia and/or bleeding, obstruction, suspicion of carcinoid tumour, or suspicion of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Results. In 50 of our 179 patients (28%), we diagnosed some small intestinal tumours: hamartomas in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in 16 patients, adenocarcinoma in 7, lymphoma in 6, carcinoid tumour in 4, melanoma and stromal tumour in 3, adenoma, lipoma, and inflammatory polyps in 2, and granular cell tumour, cavernous lymphangioma, fibrolipoma, Cronkhite-Canada polyps, and metastatic involvement in individual cases. Conclusion. BE facilitates exploration and treatment of the small intestine. The procedure is generally safe and useful. BE and CE are essential modalities for the management of small intestinal diseases.

Small bowel polypectomy by double balloon enteroscopy: Correlation with prior capsule endoscopy

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of small bowel polypectomy using double balloon enteroscopy and to evaluate the correlation with capsule endoscopy (CE).

METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a single tertiary hospital. Twenty-five patients treated by enteroscopy for small bowel polyps diagnosed by CE or other imaging techniques were included. The correlation between CE and enteroscopy (correlation coefficient of Kendall for the number of polyps, intra-class coefficient for the size and coefficient of correlation kappa for the location) was evaluated.

RESULTS: There were 31 polypectomies and 12 endoscopic mucosal resections with limited morbidity and no mortality. Histological analysis revealed 27 hamartomas, 6 adenomas and 3 lipomas. Strong agreement between CE and optical enteroscopy was observed for both location (Kappa value: 0.90) and polyp size (Kappa value: 0.76), but only moderate agreement was found for the number of polyps (Kendall value: 0.47).

CONCLUSION: Double balloon enteroscopy is safe for performing polypectomy. Previous CE is useful in selecting the endoscopic approach and to predicting the difficulty of the procedure.

Performance of double-balloon enteroscopy for the management of small bowel polyps in hamartomatous polyposis syndromes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are a group of rare inherited autosomal dominant disorders. Small bowel polyposis is one of the manifestations of HPS. Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) with polypectomy may obviate repeated small bowel surgeries for polyp intussusception, obstruction, or bleeding. The efficacy and safety of DBE-assisted polypectomy in HPS patients with clinically significant small bowel polyposis were evaluated.

METHODS

All HPS patients who underwent DBE from January 2007 to April 2011 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on patient demographics, pre-DBE radiological studies, polyp characteristics, procedural outcomes, and complications were abstracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients underwent a total of 34 DBE procedures. Pre-DBE imaging included computed tomography enterography (n = 15), computed tomography enteroclysis (n = 5), small bowel follow-through (n = 1), and magnetic resonance enterography (n = 1). Any small bowel polyp ≥ 1 cm in size on radiological imaging was referred for DBE-assisted polypectomy. Antegrade and retrograde DBE were successful in reaching and resecting targeted polyps in 90% (18/20) and 71.4% (10/14) of procedures, respectively. The overall success rate for DBE-assisted polypectomy was 82.3% (95% confidence interval: 66.5-91.6%). The median size of resected polyps was 2 cm (range 1-5 cm) and all were hamartomas. Minor adverse events occurred in four (11.8%) procedures, including abdominal pain (n = 2), immediate post-polypectomy bleeding (n = 1), and self-limited hematochezia (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

DBE-assisted polypectomy was successful in over 80% of HPS patients with an acceptable margin of safety. To the knowledge of the authors, this is one of the largest single-center studies to report on the performance and safety of DBE-assisted polypectomy in HPS patients.

Protein expression and gene mutation of Brg1 in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

AIM: To investigate the protein expression and gene mutation of Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1) in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and to analyze their relation with tumor development.

METHODS: The expression of Brg1 protein in 72 cases of PJS polyps was detected by immunohistochemistry. Mutations in exons 4 and 10 of the Brg1 gene was detected by means of polymerase chain reaction-direct sequencing (PCR-DNA) in 39 cases of PJS polyps and 2 cases of carcinoma.

RESULTS: The positive rate of Brg1 protein expression in PJS (54.17%) was lower than that in adenocarcinoma (76.67%) but higher than that in normal tissue (16.67%). There was a significant difference in the positive rate of Brg1 protein expression among the three groups (P < 0.05). No Brg1 gene mutations were detected in 39 cases of PJS polyps and 2 cases of carcinoma.

CONCLUSION: Increased expression of Brg1 protein in PJS may be associated with the development of this disease. Brg1 gene mutations might be rare in PJS. Brg1 expression can be used as an important parameter for differentiating malignancy and evaluating prognosis of PJS.

Surveillance of patients affected by Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: diagnostic value of MR enterography in prone and supine position

INTRODUCTION

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a familial polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple hamartomatous polyps throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of our study was to retrospectively determine the diagnostic value of MR enterography (MRE), performed in supine and prone position, in the detection of small bowel polyps in PJ patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed MRE examinations of 8 PJS patients who underwent MRE, pushed-double-ballon enteroscopy, laparoscopic endoscopy or surgery, within 3 months. Polietilenglicole was orally administered before the examination. True FISP and HASTE sequences were acquired in supine and prone position; 3D VIBE Gd-enhanced sequences in prone position only.

RESULTS

Concordance between MRE and endoscopy was 72.6% for polyps <15 mm, 93% for polyps >15 mm. In supine and prone position concordance with endoscopy for polyps <15 mm was 63% and 66.8%, respectively. In the detection of smaller polyps the difference between supine position only and supine plus prone position was statistically significant (P < 0.027).

DISCUSSION

MRE performed by combining prone and supine position was accurate in the detection of PJS polyps, with 93% concordance with enteroscopy for larger and more risky polyps. MRE offers a promising and non invasive alternative to capsule endoscopy, suggesting the possibility of an effective yearly surveillance in PJ patients.

Double-balloon endoscopy in clinical practice: where are we now?

Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) was developed in 2000 for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases. Although use rates still differ between Eastern and Western countries, DBE quickly reached a broad global diffusion. Together with capsule endoscopy (CE), DBE represented 'a revolution' for the management of small bowel diseases because of its therapeutic capabilities. At present, the main indications for DBE in clinical practice are obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease and familial polyposis. In the setting of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, DBE seems to have similar diagnostic performances as capsule endoscopy, but it allows for a more definitive diagnosis and the treatment of identified lesions. The main contribution of DBE in the management of Crohn's disease patients is its therapeutic capabilities. Indeed, several recently published studies have suggested that endoscopic dilation of small bowel strictures can delay or, in the near future, could even replace surgical interventions. Also, for patients with familial polyposis syndromes, DBE can represent a viable alternative to small bowel surgery. The complication rate of DBE appears to be low; major complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation, have been reported in approximately 1% of all diagnostic DBE whereas the complication rate for therapeutic procedures is about 5%.

Small bowel endoscopy and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a rare, autosomal dominant inherited disease. It is clinically characterized by the development of gastrointestinal hamartomas, mainly located in the small bowel. These hamartomas are prone to complications such as intussusceptions, abdominal complaints and anaemia. Furthermore, patients are at increased risk for developing small bowel cancer. Therefore, regular surveillance of the small bowel is indicated. However, the optimal strategy for surveillance has not been determined yet. This review gives an overview of the different techniques that have been described to examine the small bowel of PJS patients. First, a number of radiologic and endoscopic imaging modalities with diagnostic value are discussed. Secondly, recently developed advanced endoscopy techniques are described that can serve both as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the surveillance of the small bowel. Finally, a recommendation is given how to apply these individual techniques for small bowel surveillance in a step-up approach.

Gastrointestinal polyps and cancer in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: clinical aspects

The two main problems in the management of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) are the long term cancer risk and managing polyp related complications, such as intussusception and bleeding. In this article we will focus mainly on the clinical management of these problems. We will highlight some of the controversies regarding gastrointestinal PJS polyps, cancer development and cancer risk. We will review the available literature, particularly focusing on clinical data, to provide insights into these controversies. We describe guidelines for the surveillance and management of gastrointestinal polyps in PJS and review the data behind current recommendations.

Interventional balloon-enteroscopy

Balloon assisted enteroscopy (BE) expands greatly the therapeutic options in interventional endoscopy; bleeding sites, strictures, polyps, and other small bowel lesions are increasingly been treated by use of BE in the last 10 years. Treatment options for small bowel bleeding include Argon plasma coagulation (APC), injection therapy, and application of TTS metal clips, and thereby bleeding is stopped in most cases. Dilating symptomatic strictures, resecting polyps as seen in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and removing foreign bodies, BE carries most endoscopic treatment techniques to the small bowel. Another new indication field for BE are interventions at the biliary system in patients with surgically modified anatomy such as Roux-Y anastomosis. This review offers a full overview on indications of BE and refers to the practical use of the method for all endoscopic interventions.

Expression of Brg1, VEGF and COX-2 in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

AIM: To detect the expression of brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) proteins in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and to analyze their clinical significance.

METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of Brg1, VEGF and COX-2 proteins in 72 PJS samples, 12 normal small intestinal mucosal tissue samples and 30 cancer tissue samples.

RESULTS: The positive rates of Brg1, VEGF and COX-2 expression were significantly higher in PJS than in normal mucosal tissue (54.17% vs 16.67%, 58.33% vs 8.33%, 62.50% vs 25.00%, all P < 0.01) and in cancer tissue than in PJS (76.67% vs 54.17%, 80.00% vs 58.33%, 83.33% vs 62.50% all P < 0.01). In PJS, positive correlations were found between Brg1 and VEGF expression and between Brg1 and COX-2 expression.

CONCLUSION: Brg1, VEGF and COX-2 may play a role in the occurrence of PJS.