Caustic injuries of the upper digestive tract: a population observational study

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing emergency surgery for corrosive injury of the upper digestive tract

PURPOSE

Emergency surgery can save patients' lives in cases of severe caustic injury. However, the long-term outcomes are not well understood.

METHODS

Patients who underwent emergency organ resection for severe corrosive acid injury were included. Subsequently, digestive tract reconstruction was performed to fit patients. Long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent emergency digestive tract resection. The operative mortality rate was 6% (of 3/50). One of the 50 patients underwent successful immediate reconstruction. Of the 46 survivors with digestive tract discontinuity, 32 (70%) underwent subsequent reconstructive surgery, 10 (22%) died while awaiting reconstruction due to deterioration in their psychiatric and nutritional status, and 4 (9%) were unfit for reconstructive surgery. No operative mortality occurred during reconstruction. Among the 32 patients who underwent reconstruction, 30 (94%) achieved nutritional autonomy. Nutritional independence was achieved in 62% of the patients (31/50). At a median duration of 58 months, the median survival time of the 50 patients was 158 months. Patients who underwent reconstruction had a significantly better overall survival than those who did not (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency surgery remains the standard treatment for corrosive ingestion of complicated digestive tract injuries. However, only 60% of survivors can undergo subsequent digestive reconstruction and achieve long-term nutritional autonomy and a survival outcome.

Inflammatory Causes of Dysphagia in Children

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are the most common inflammatory causes of pediatric dysphagia, but several other less prevalent conditions should be considered. These conditions can affect one or several aspects of the swallowing process. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia may be an early symptom. Esophagoscopy and instrumental swallow studies are often needed to determine the underlying diagnosis and best treatment plan. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia can portend a worse outcome and need for more aggressive treatment of the underlying condition. Consultations with speech language pathology, gastroenterology, dietetics, allergy/immunology and/or rheumatology are often needed to optimize management.

Can we predict the risk of esophageal stricture after caustic injury?

Nonoperative management of severe caustic injuries has demonstrated its feasibility, avoiding the need for emergency esogastric resection and resulting in low mortality rates. However, leaving superficial necrosis in place could increase the risk of esophageal stricture development. Data on the risk factors of esophageal stricture secondary to caustic ingestion are scarce. The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors for esophageal strictures after caustic ingestion at admission. From February 2015 to March 2021, all consecutive patients with esophageal or gastric caustic injury score ≥ II according to the Zargar classification were retrospectively analyzed. For each patient, we collected over 50 criteria at admission to the emergency room and then selected among them 20 criteria with the best clinical relevance and limited missing data for risk factor analyses. Among the 184 patients included in this study, 37 developed esophageal strictures (cumulative rate 29.4%). All esophageal strictures occurred within 3 months. In multivariate analyses, the risk factors for esophageal strictures were voluntary ingestion (cause-specific hazard ratio 5.92; 95% confidence interval 1.76-19.95, P = 0.004), Zargar's esophageal score ≥ III (cause-specific hazard ratio 14.30; 95% confidence interval 6.07-33.67, P < 0.001), and severe ear, nose, and throat lesions (cause-specific hazard ratio 2.15; 95% confidence interval 1.09-4.22, P = 0.027). Intentional ingestion, severe endoscopic grade, and severe ENT lesions were identified as risk factors for esophageal stricture following caustic ingestion. Preventive measures for this population require further evaluation.

Predicting Factors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized after Esophageal Foreign Body or Caustic Injuries: The Experience of a Tertiary Center

Ingestion of foreign bodies (IFB) and ingestion of caustic agents are frequent non-hemorrhagic causes of endoscopic urgencies, with the potential for severe complications. This study aimed to evaluate the predicting factors of the clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized as a result of IFB or ingestion of caustics (IC). This was a retrospective single-center study of patients admitted for IFB or IC between 2000 and 2019 at a tertiary center. Demographic and clinical data, as well as preliminary exams, were evaluated. Also, variables of the clinical outcomes, including the length of stay (LS) and other inpatient complications, were assessed. Sixty-six patients were included (44 IFB and 22 IC). The median LS was 7 days, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.07). The values of C-reactive protein (CRP) upon admission correlated with the LS in the IFB group (p < 0.01) but not with that of those admitted after IC. In the IFB patients, a diagnosis of perforation on both an endoscopy (p = 0.02) and CT scan (p < 0.01) was correlated with the LS. The Zargar classification was not correlated with the LS in the IC patients (p = 0.36). However, it was correlated with antibiotics, nosocomial pneumonia and an increased need for intensive care treatment. CT assessment of the severity of the caustic lesions did not correlate with the LS. In patients admitted for IFB, CRP values may help stratify the probability of complications. In patients admitted due to IC, the Zargar classification may help to predict inpatient complications, but it does not correlate with the LS.

Diagnostic accuracy of drooling, reluctance, oropharynx, others, and leukocytosis score as a predictor of mortality and complications following acute corrosive ingestion

OBJECTIVES

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is considered the gold standard in assessing the severity of injury to the gastrointestinal tract following corrosive ingestion. Zargar's endoscopic grading of injury helps in prognostication as well as guiding management. Since the major burden of cases lies in resource-limited settings, the availability of endoscopic evaluation is a limiting factor. Hence, it is prudent to develop bedside tools that can be used as screening tools to identify patients at high risk of mortality and complications so that timely referrals and judicious utilization of resources can be made. Literature in this regard is limited and published studies have shown that clinical features fail to predict the severity of injury. We aimed our study to find the role of Drooling, Reluctance, Oropharynx, Others, and Leukocytosis (DROOL) score as a predictor of mortality and complications following acute corrosive ingestion.

METHODS

This was a diagnostic accuracy study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital in North India. We screened all cases of acute corrosive ingestion presented to our ED. We collected the data on demographic profile, clinical features, investigations, endoscopy findings, treatment, and DROOL score. We followed patients for up to 12 weeks for outcomes including mortality and complications.

RESULTS

We studied 79 patients of acute corrosive ingestion. The median age was 26 years with a female predominance. Nausea, vomiting, and pain abdomen were the common symptoms. The median DROOL score was 4. The majority of our patients had normal to Zargar grade 1 injury to the stomach and esophagus. Out of 79 patients, 27 patients developed some complications. The overall mortality up to 12 weeks was 10%. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under the ROC (AUROC) curve of Zargar classification in predicting overall complications was 0.909 (96% confidence interval [CI]: 0.842-0.975) and it was 0.775 (95% CI: 0.553-1.000) in predicting mortality. The AUROC of DROOL score in predicting overall complications was 0.932 (95% CI: 0.877-0.987) and the AUROC of DROOL score in predicting mortality was 0.864 (95% CI: 0.758-0.970). The ROC analysis showed that a DROOL score ≤4 has a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 77.8% in predicting overall complications. Similarly, DROOL score ≤5 has a sensitivity of 81.7% and a specificity of 62.5% in predicting the development of mortality. Delong test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in Zargar versus DROOL score in terms of prediction of mortality and overall complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DROOL score is comparable to Zargar score in identifying patients at high risk of mortality and complications. Hence, DROOL score can be used for risk stratification of patients presenting with corrosive ingestion.

Dietary and Nutritional Support in Gastrointestinal Diseases of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract (I): Esophagus

The esophagus is the centerpiece of the digestive system of individuals and plays an essential role in transporting swallowed nutrients to the stomach. Diseases of the esophagus can alter this mechanism either by causing anatomical damage that obstructs the lumen of the organ (e.g., peptic, or eosinophilic stricture) or by generating severe motility disorders that impair the progression of the alimentary bolus (e.g., severe dysphagia of neurological origin or achalasia). In all cases, nutrient assimilation may be compromised. In some cases (e.g., ingestion of corrosive agents), a hypercatabolic state is generated, which increases resting energy expenditure. This manuscript reviews current clinical guidelines on the dietary and nutritional management of esophageal disorders such as severe oropharyngeal dysphagia, achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, lesions by caustics, and gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications (Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma). The importance of nutritional support in improving outcomes is also highlighted.

Outcomes of the management of corrosive injuries of the upper digestive tract in a tertiary care center

Esophageal stricture is the most common delayed sequelae of aerodigestive tract corrosive injuries. Early endoscopic dilatation is an integral part of corrosive injury management. Self-dilatation of the esophagus is effective in preventing stricture recurrence. In this prospective study, we included patients with corrosive aerodigestive tract injury from January 2009 to December 2020. We analyzed the outcome of the endoscopic dilatation and self-dilatation treatments administered to patients with a corrosive esophageal stricture. Among 295 patients, 164 had an esophageal injury, 73 had esophago-gastric injury, 55 had a gastric injury, and 3 had the pharyngeal injury. Of the 295 patients, 194 (81.85%) underwent dilatation, and 13 patients with diffuse esophageal injury underwent upfront surgery. Successful dilatation was performed in 169 (87.11%) patients. Of the 68 patients undergoing self-dilatation, 63 patients achieved nutritional autonomy by 28 days. Early endoscopic dilatation effectively prevents surgery, and self-dilatation appears promising to prevent recurrent esophageal stricture.

Surgical management of esophageal stenosis due to ingestion of corrosive substances

BACKGROUND

Corrosive ingestion is a significant challenge for healthcare systems. Limited data are available regarding the best treatments, and there remains a lack of consensus about the optimal surgical approach and its outcomes. This study aims to review the current literature and show a single institution's experience regarding the surgical treatment of esophageal stenosis due to corrosive substance ingestion.

METHODS

A retrospective review that accounted for demographics, psychiatric profiles, surgical procedures, and outcomes was performed. A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed.

RESULTS

In total, 27 surgical procedures for esophageal stenosis due to corrosive substance ingestion were performed from 2010 to 2019. Depression and drug abuse were diagnosed in 30% and 22% of the included patients, respectively. Esophagectomies and esophageal bypasses were performed in 13 and 14 patients, respectively. No 30-day mortality was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention either by esophagectomy or esophageal bypass results in durable relief from dysphagia. However, successful clinical outcomes depend on a high-quality multidisciplinary network of esophageal and thoracic surgeons, intensivists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and nutritional teams.

Corrosive substances ingestion: a review

Corrosive chemical substance ingestions are a major problem, especially in developing countries, but also in developed countries such as the United States, France, and Belgium. Ingestions may be deliberate as suicide attempts (mostly in adolescents and adults) or accidental (mostly in children). The results can be devastating in terms of individual suffering and disability, but also in terms of resource utilization and costs. In developing countries, outcomes may be worse because of limited medical/surgical resources. Common sequelae include gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, stomach, pylorus, and duodenum) stricture formation, GI tract perforation, and hemorrhage. Systemic effects may also occur, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi-organ system failure, and sepsis. Various interventions in the acute phase to reduce the severity of injury have been attempted, but there are no large controlled clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy. Dilation therapy in various forms is commonly used for the treatment of strictures and a variety of surgical procedures including esophagectomy and delayed replacement may be required in severe corrosive injury cases.

Evaluation of severe caustic gastritis by computed tomography and its impact on management

INTRODUCTION

Serious caustic burns of the stomach that present with no clinico-biological severity criteria (CBSC) can be treated conservatively. However, even if there are no CBSC at admission, 20% of patients still require delayed emergency surgery for peritonitis due to gastric perforation thus showing the limitations of this strategy in the diagnosis of irreversible gastric necrosis lesions. The aim of this study was to identify reliable computed tomography (CT) signs of irreversible gastric necrosis in patients with stage 3 endoscopic lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study from March 2014 to January 2017, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan was performed in 30 consecutive patients with stage 3 endoscopic gastric lesions. The CT results were concealed from the clinicians and compared to CBSC results.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated conservatively and ten patients were operated on. Seventy percent of the patients underwent urgent delayed surgery for symptoms that developed late but before alterations in the CBSC. The CT scan showed a perfusion defect (PD) of gastric mucosal enhancement in all patients operated on for gastrointestinal distress, and could have provided an early diagnosis of irreversible gastric necrosis.

CONCLUSION

CT was a more effective diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of irreversible gastric necrosis following caustic ingestion than a strategy based on digestive endoscopy and the use of CBSC. CT could eventually replace gastrointestinal endoscopy in the emergency evaluation of gastroesophageal caustic burns.

Evaluation and Management of Premalignant Conditions of the Esophagus: A Systematic Survey of International Guidelines

Esophageal cancer represents one of the most lethal forms of malignancy. The growing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma represents an emerging public health concern. This review article summarizes current diagnostic, management, and therapeutic practices of premalignant conditions of the esophagus including Barrett's esophagus, tylosis, granular cell tumors, achalasia, and the ingestion of caustic substances. Our report provides clinicians and academics with a global clinical perspective regarding presentation, surveillance guidelines, and therapeutic management of these esophageal conditions.

Corrosive Esophageal Strictures: From Dilatation to Replacement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Endoscopic dilatation is the recommended primary therapy for chronic corrosive esophageal strictures (ES), and surgery is reserved for failed dilatation. Through this study, we intend to analyze the efficacy and long-term outcomes of both endoscopic and surgical interventions in corrosive ES. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic corrosive ES, managed with endoscopic or surgical procedures at a tertiary teaching institute in North India from December 2009 to December 2016, was performed from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the absence of dysphagia following dilatation or surgery. During the study period, 64 patients with ES underwent surgical or endoscopic treatment. Associated gastric strictures and pharyngeal strictures were present in 39 (60%) and 22 patients (28.9%), respectively. The mean age was 28.8 years and mean BMI was 14.2 kg/m². Acid was the most common corrosive substance. Endoscopic dilatation using Savary-Gilliard (SG) dilators was successful in achieving persistent symptom relief in 46 patients (71.8%) after a total of 358 sessions (mean number of dilatations were 5.2 ± 1.2) of dilatations over 2 years. The dilatation therapy failed in 18 patients (28.1%) including technical failures (15.6%), perforations (3.1%), refractory stricture (1.5%) and recurrent strictures (7.8%). Increasing stricture length (more than 6 cm) was associated with poor outcome of endoscopic dilatation (p < 0.001). Only eleven patients (17%) required esophageal replacement (resection: 0, bypass: 11) for failed dilatations including seven gastric pull-ups and four pharyngo-coloplasty. The stricture rate after surgery was 36.3% (4/11). The median follows up was 32 months. Endoscopic dilatation of corrosive ES is safe and effective therapy and should be the first-line therapy for these patients and surgery should be considered only in patients who have unsuccessful outcome following dilatation therapy.

Endoscopic findings and outcome in caustic ingestion of acidic and alkaline agents in adults: A retrospective analysis

Caustic ingestion in adults is a rare but potentially life-threatening problem. It remains controversial whether endoscopic findings and mortality differ between acid and alkali ingestion. We compared ingestion of these agents and evaluated prediction parameters for survival and complications.Adult patients who presented with caustic ingestion were analyzed from 2005 to 2016. Mucosal injury was graded endoscopically by Zargar's score. Age, gender, intent of ingestion, caustic agents, comorbidities, management, complications, and mortality were examined.Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria and were divided into acid (n = 10) and alkali group (n = 21). Ingestion of alkali resulted in higher grades (≥III) of esophageal (56% vs 24%, P = .01) and stomach injuries (43% vs 13%, P = .05) and was mostly done with suicidal intent (76% vs 30%, P = .003). Patients in the alkali group received more often surgical interventions, mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Overall complications including Zargar's-score ≥ grade III, mediastinitis, and aspiration pneumonia were higher in alkali group but all showed no statistical significance (P = .73). Mortality (acid: 1 (10%), alkali: 4 (19%), P = .52), age, gender, comorbidities, and intensive care management did not differ significantly between the groups. Chronic renal failure and mediastinitis were promising prediction parameters for mortality but did not reach statistical significance. No independent risk factors for the development of esophageal stenosis were identified.Alkaline agents caused a higher mucosal injury severity and were more often used in suicidal intent. Mediastinitis and chronic renal failure might be potential prediction parameters for survival but need to be evaluated in larger studies.

Role of endoscopy in caustic injury of the esophagus

Caustic injury of the esophagus is a problematic condition challenging endoscopists worldwide. Although the caustic agents and motives are different among countries and age groups, endoscopy still plays an invaluable role in diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopy can determine the severity of caustic ingestion which is of great importance in choosing appropriate treatment. However, some aspects of endoscopy in diagnosis of caustic injury remain controversial. Whether or not all patients need endoscopy, when to perform endoscopy and how to assess the severity are just some examples of these controversies. Due to lack of randomized controlled trials, many findings and suggestions are inconclusive. Computerized tomography scan of the chest and abdomen gains popularity in assessing the severity of caustic injury and avoiding unnecessary surgery. If esophageal stricture eventually develops, endoscopic dilatation is a mainstay. Maneuvers such as steroid injection and esophageal stent may be used in a refractory stricture. Nevertheless, some patients have to undergo surgery in spite of vigorous attempts with esophageal dilatation. To date, caustic injury remains a difficult situation. This article reviews all aspects of caustic injury of the esophagus focusing on endoscopic role. Pre-endoscopic management, endoscopy and its technique in acute and late phase of caustic injury including the endoscopic management of refractory stricture, and the treatment outcomes following each endoscopic intervention are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the role of endoscopy in the long term follow-up of patients with esophageal caustic injury is addressed.

Risk Factors for Esophageal Stricture in Grade 2b and 3a Corrosive Esophageal Injuries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Publications document the risk of developing esophageal stricture as a sequential complication of esophageal injury grades 2b and 3a. Although there are studies describing the risk factors of post-corrosive stricture, there is limited literature on these factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different factors with post-corrosive esophageal stricture and non-stricture groups in endoscopic grades 2b and 3a of corrosive esophageal injuries.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively analyzed in the patients with esophageal injury grades 2b and 3a between January 2011 and December 2017.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six corrosive ingestion patients were admitted with 32 patients (15.8%) in grade 2b and 12 patients (6.1%) in grade 3a and stricture was developed in 19 patients (61.3%) with grade 2b and in 10 patients (83.3%) with grade 3a. The patients' height of the non-stricture group was greater than that of stricture groups (2b stricture group, 1.58 ± 0.08 m; 2b non-stricture group, 1.66 ± 0.07 m; p < 0.004; 3a stricture group, 1.52 ± 0.09 m; 3a non-stricture group, 1.71 ± 0.02 m; p < 0.001). Omeprazole was more commonly used in the non-stricture than stricture group (26.3% in the 2b stricture group, 69.2% in the 2b non-stricture group, p = 0.017; 50% in the 3a stricture group, 100% in the 3a non-stricture group, 1.71 ± 0.02 m, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The height of patients may help to predict the risks and the prescription of omeprazole may help to minimize the risks of 2b and 3a post-corrosive esophageal stricture.

Submucosal hematoma: a new distinctive sign during emergency upper digestive endoscopy for ammonia ingestion

Background

Submucosal hematoma has never been associated with caustic injuries. Long-term follow-up of patients who ingested ammonia is not well known and ammonia ingestion is rare.

Methods

In a Single-center observational study, prospective data were collected from 2009 to 2013, in patients over the age of 14 years old referred for ammonia ingestion. The emergency and follow-up endoscopic data and the outcome were reported.

Results

Ammonia ingestion occurred in 43 patients. Submucosal hematoma of the gastric wall was a distinctive endoscopic sign observed in 15 (34.8%) cases. Oropharyngeal lesions were present in 30 (69.8%) patients, which was associated with ingestion with suicidal intent in 18 cases. Mild and severe endoscopic lesions (grade IIB to IIIB) were found in 16 (37.2%) cases with 10 (23.3%) cases presenting submucosal hematoma at initial endoscopy. A complete spontaneous gastric healing was frequently observed in 36 (83.7%) cases. In 11 cases with submucosal hematoma, a favourable outcome was observed with a medical treatment, however 6 of these patients had severe endoscopic lesions initially.

Conclusions

Submucosal hematoma of the gastric wall is an endoscopic sign occurring frequently in ammonia ingestion. Submucosal hematoma should be distinguished from necrosis in order to avoid false misclassification in favour of more severe lesions, which would lead to an abusive surgery.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-018-0809-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice

These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.

Dysphagia and Speech-Language Pathology Involvement Following Chemical Ingestion Injury: A Review of 44 Cases Admitted to a Quaternary Australian Hospital (2008-2012)

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of an adult chemical ingestion population and examine the course of return to oral intake post injury and speech-language pathologist (SLP) involvement during the initial acute-care admission.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review of adults admitted to a quaternary hospital for the treatment of an acute chemical ingestion injury between 2008 and 2012 was conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-four adults (23 men, 21 women) were identified as receiving treatment for ingestion injury, of whom 18 (40.91%) required altered oral intake. Of those requiring altered oral intake, 50% were referred to SLPs. Individuals requiring altered oral intake were significantly (p < .05) older, more likely to be men, and present with more severe injuries requiring longer ICU and hospital admissions following intentional chemical ingestions than those who were able to commence a normal oral diet without any alteration or nonoral supplementation. By discharge, 15.91% (n = 7) of the total cohort had not resumed normal oral intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Return to oral intake post chemical ingestion injury can be protracted and complex. Referrals to SLPs were limited. These data may aid prognostic insight as well as provide (a) collateral information to assist discharge planning and follow-up and (b) background for evaluating the potential for SLP involvement.

Caustic Ingestion in the Elderly: Influence of Age on Clinical Outcome

Caustic poisonings are still associated with many fatalities. Studies focusing on the elderly are rare. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of caustic ingestion injury in elderly and non-elderly adults with regard to gender, intent of exposure, substance ingested, severity of mucosal injury, complications, and mortality. Caustic substance exposures reported to the National Toxicological Information Centre in Slovakia during 1998–2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: the non-elderly (<60 years) and elderly adults (≥60 years). The mortality rate in the elderly was significantly higher (elderly 23.0% vs. non-elderly 11.3%; p = 0.041). The risk of fatal outcome in the elderly was increased by acid ingestion (OR = 7.822; p = 0.002), particularly hydrochloric acid (OR = 5.714, p = 0.006). The incidence of respiratory complications was almost two times higher in the elderly was 31.1% vs. 17.4% for the non-elderly (p = 0.037). Respiratory complications significantly correlated with an increased mortality rate (p = 0.001) in the elderly whereas there was no association between GI complications and mortality in the elderly (p = 0.480). Elderly patients with respiratory complications had the poorest clinical outcomes. The highest risk of complications and fatalities was observed in patients after hydrochloric acid ingestion.

Outcome of dilatation and predictors of failed dilatation in patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal strictures

Outcome of endoscopic dilatation in acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture is less known. This study aims to determine the outcome of dilatation and predictors of failed dilatation in patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture. Patients diagnosed of corrosive esophageal strictures were included. Endoscopic dilatation with graded Savary-Gilliard dilator was performed as the first line treatment. Outcome of dilatation was considered favorable when patients were able to swallow solid without intervention at least six months after successful dilatation. Failure of dilatation was defined as one of the following; complete luminal stenosis, inability to perform safe dilatation, perforation, and inability to maintain adequate luminal patency. Surgery or repeated dilatation was indicated in failed dilatations. There were 55 patients with corrosive esophageal strictures. Of 55 patients, 41 (75%) had failed dilatation (38 having esophageal replacement procedure, two continue repeated dilatation and one unfit for surgery). Of 323 sessions of dilatations, eight out of 55 patients (14.5%) had perforations. There was no dilatation-related mortality. Patients with concomitant pharyngeal stricture (p = 0.0001), long (≥ 10 cm) stricture length (p < 0.0001), number of dilatation >6 sessions per year (p = 0.01) and refractory stricture (inability to pass a larger than 11 mm dilator within three sessions) (p = 0.01) were more likely to have failed dilatation. Thirty-two of 38 patients with surgery had good swallow outcome with one operative mortality (2.6%). At the median follow-up of 61 months, overall favorable outcome was 84% after surgery and 25% for dilatation (p < 0.0001). Majority of patients with acid-induced corrosive esophageal stricture were refractory to dilatation. Esophageal dilatations were ultimately failed in three-fourth of the patients. Concomitant cricopharyngeal stricture, long stricture length, requiring frequent dilatation, and refractory to >11 mm dilatation were factors associated with failed dilatation.

Risk factors for symptomatic esophageal stricture after caustic ingestion-a retrospective cohort study

Esophageal stricture is a major secondary complication of ingesting caustic agents. We examined our experiences with caustic injuries with a view to finding clinical and biological risk factors of esophageal strictures secondary to caustic ingestion. Records were retrieved for 58 adults admitted consecutively to our intensive care unit for caustic ingestion. Fifty cases were managed conservatively and therefore retained for analyses. Patients were grouped according to whether they developed strictures or not during the follow-up period. Mucosal damage was assessed by emergency endoscopy. Eleven patients (22%) developed a stricture. At referral, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and hematemesis were associated with secondary stricture (respectively P = 0.047, P = 0.008, P = 0.02). A high Zargar endoscopic grade (above IIa; P = 0.02), the ingestion of strong acids or alkalis (P = 0.006), hyperleukocytosis (P = 0.02), and a low prothrombin ratio (P = 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of developing a stricture. The median delay of stricture diagnosis was 12 (8;16) days after ingestion, with extreme values from 4 to 26 days. Initial symptoms such as dysphagia or hematemesis, early endoscopy showing >IIa grade esophagitis, and certain laboratory results should draw the physician's attention to a high risk of esophageal stricture.

Caustic ingestion

Corrosive ingestion is a rare but potentially devastating event and, despite the availability of effective preventive public health strategies, injuries continue to occur. Most clinicians have limited personal experience and rely on guidelines; however, uncertainty persists about best clinical practice. Ingestions range from mild cases with no injury to severe cases with full thickness necrosis of the oesophagus and stomach. CT scan is superior to traditional endoscopy for stratification of patients to emergency resection or observation. Oesophageal stricture is a common consequence of ingestion and newer stents show some promise; however, the place of endoscopic stenting for corrosive strictures is yet to be defined. We summarise the evidence to provide a plan for managing these potentially life-threatening injuries and discuss the areas where further research is required to improve outcomes.

Digestive system damage in acute poisoning and treatment strategy

Acute intoxication is a common critical clinical condition. Poisoning patients tend to have an urgent onset, critical illness and rapid progression. If timely and reasonable treatment is not given, there will be a serious threat to patients' life. Drugs, alcohol, pesticides, and poisonous chemicals are clinically common toxic substances, and oral suicide is a major cause of poisoning. Therefore, suicidal patients absorb poison mainly through the digestive tract, and digestive system damage is common and serious. Awareness of digestive system damage in patients with acute poisoning and treatment measures has important clinical significance for improving the overall prognosis of these patients. This paper discusses the latest research progress in understanding digestive system damage in acute poisoning and treatment strategy.

Tracheobronchial Necrosis After Caustic Ingestion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the management and outcome of tracheobronchial necrosis (TBN) after caustic ingestion.

BACKGROUND

Emergency pulmonary patch repair has been reported to be lifesaving in patients with caustic TBN.

METHODS

Patients who underwent management of caustic TBN between 1989 and 2013, were included. TBN was defined as early if present on admission and late if occurring thereafter. Operative outcomes, long-term survival, and functional outcomes were compared with those of 269 patients without TBN who underwent esophagectomy for caustic injuries.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included (10 men; median age = 39 years). Early TBN was detected in 14 patients, and late TBN occurred in 7 patients, 8 days (range:: 6-10 days) after admission. TBN involved the left bronchus (n = 17; 85%), the carina (n = 10; 50%), the supracarinal trachea (n = 9; 45%), the right bronchus (n = 4; 20%), and the cervical trachea (n = 3; 15%). Seventeen patients underwent esophagogastrectomy, 2 underwent esophagectomy, and in 1 patient, resection was eventually abandoned. Pulmonary patch repair was performed in 16 patients (80%). Nine patients (45%) died and morbidity was 100%. In univariate analysis, late TBN (P = 0.017) and acid ingestion (P = 0.002) were predictors of mortality. All survivors underwent restoring colopharyngoplasty. Five-year survival (28%) and functional success (25%) rates were significantly impaired when compared with esophagectomy patients without TBN.

CONCLUSIONS

TBN is one of the most devastating complications of caustic ingestion. Pulmonary patch repair is technically simple and can be lifesaving in this difficult situation.

Caustic ingestion injury of the upper aerodigestive tract in adults

Adult ingestion of caustic substances is an unusual but serious surgical problem, with injuries likely to be more extensive than those in the corresponding paediatric population. After initial stabilisation and airway management, clinicians are presented with a complex multisystemic problem, frequently requiring a multidisciplinary approach involving several surgical disciplines and associated therapies. A new multidisciplinary team was convened to discuss complex ingestion injury in adults and established techniques were used to bring forward a proposed treatment algorithm. An algorithm may potentially improve clinical efficacy and risk in the management of these complex patients.

Foregut caustic injuries: results of the world society of emergency surgery consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

Lesions of the upper digestive tract due to ingestion of caustic agents still represent a major medical and surgical emergency worldwide. The work-up of these patients is poorly defined and no clear therapeutic guidelines are available.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based international consensus on primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of this life-threatening and potentially disabling condition.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed by an international panel of experts under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The level of evidence of the screened publications was graded using the Oxford 2011 criteria. The level of evidence of the literature and the main topics regarding foregut caustic injuries were discussed during a dedicated meeting in Milan, Italy (April 2015), and during the 3rd Annual Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery in Jerusalem, Israel (July 2015).

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-seven full papers which addressed the relevant clinical questions of the research were admitted to the consensus conference. There was an unanimous consensus on the fact that the current literature on foregut caustic injuries lacks homogeneous classification systems and prospective methodology. Moreover, the non-standardized definition of technical and clinical success precludes any accurate comparison of therapeutic modalities. Key recommendations and algorithms based on expert opinions, retrospective studies and literature reviews were proposed and approved during the final consensus conference. The clinical practice guidelines resulting from the consensus conference were approved by the WSES council.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations emerging from this consensus conference, although based on a low level of evidence, have important clinical implications. A world registry of foregut caustic injuries could be useful to collect a homogeneous data-base for prospective clinical studies that may help improving the current clinical practice guidelines.

Different possible surgical managements of caustic ingestion: diagnostic laparoscopy for Zargar's grade 3a lesions and a new technique of "Duodenal Damage Control" with "4-tubes ostomy" and duodenal wash-out as an option for extensive 3b lesions in unstable patients

In the present study, we have described two possible approaches in the management of caustic injuries. Diagnostic emergency laparoscopy can be used for exploration in case of stable patients with Zargar's 3a gastric lesions and equivocal peritoneal signs. On the other hand, in case of patients with Zargar's 3b gastric lesions with perforation, diffuse peritonitis and hemodynamic instability, a new possible technique is described as an option to be used in such extensive caustic injuries: duodenal damage control with "4-tubes ostomy" for duodenal and jejunal wash-out of the caustic agent. The aim of this simple technique is to wash-out the caustic agent from the duodenum when the duodenum and Treitz are not yet gangrenous/perforated, as well as to avoid duodenal primary closure and jejuno-jejunal anastomosis over damaged tissues.

Caustic ingestion-a forensic overview

The ingestion of corrosive substances may produce severe burns to the upper aerodigestive tract and stomach, particularly if the pH is greater than 12 or less than two. There is a biphasic age grouping with adult cases most often involving self-harm and pediatric cases accidental ingestion. Three cases are reported to demonstrate characteristic features following the ingestion of potassium hydroxide, glacial acetic acid and Lysol(®) , respectively. All deaths were due to the effects of caustic burns to the upper aerodigestive tract, esophagus and stomach with perforation and/or hemorrhage. The extent of injuries in these cases depends on the nature, amount, and concentration of the agent and on the exposure time. A point to note at autopsy is that tissue damage may also occur from postmortem exposure. Typical injuries involve perioral, limb, and trunk burns, with extensive aerodigestive liquefactive/coagulative necrosis causing hemorrhage and perforation.

Computed tomography evaluation of high-grade esophageal necrosis after corrosive ingestion to avoid unnecessary esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is the standard of care for high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis as assessed endoscopically. However, the inaccuracy of endoscopy in determining the depth of intramural necrosis may lead to unnecessary esophageal resection, with devastating consequences. Our aim was to evaluate the use of computed tomography (CT) for the emergency diagnostic workup of endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal necrosis.

METHODS

In a before (2000-2007)/after (2007-2012) study of patients with grade 3b endoscopic esophageal necrosis, we compared outcomes after routine emergency esophagectomy versus selection for emergency esophagectomy based on CT evidence of transmural necrosis, defined as at least two of the following: esophageal-wall blurring, periesophageal-fat blurring, and the absence of esophageal-wall enhancement. Survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Compared to the routine-esophagectomy group (n = 125), the CT group (n = 72) had better overall survival in the crude analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI], 0.21-0.85; P = 0.015) and in the analysis matched on gender, age, and ingested agent (HR, 0.36; 95 %CI, 0.16-0.79; P = 0.011). No deaths occurred among patients managed without emergency esophagectomy based on CT findings, and one-third of CT-group patients had their functioning native esophagus at last follow-up. Self-sufficiency for eating and breathing was more common (84 % vs. 65 %; relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95 %CI, 1.04-1.55; P = 0.016) and repeat suicide less common (4 % vs. 15 %; RR, 0.27; 95 %CI, 0.09-0.82; P = 0.019) in the CT group.

CONCLUSION

The decision to perform emergency esophagectomy for endoscopic high-grade corrosive esophageal injury should rely on CT findings.

Evaluation and management of caustic injuries from ingestion of Acid or alkaline substances

Although the numbers have decreased compared with in the past, cases of patients who ingest caustic substances and visit the emergency room are not rare. However, well-summarized data about caustic injuries are insufficient. Therefore, in this article, I will discuss the etiologic causative agents, injury mechanism, and clinical characteristics, as well as the endoscopic evaluation of the degree of injury and proper management of the patient, in gastrointestinal caustic injury.

Foreign bodies and caustic lesions

Foreign body ingestions, food bolus impactions, and caustic agent injuries are frequent but specific situations. Although most foreign bodies will naturally pass through the digestive tract, practitioners should recognize specific situations were endoscopic management is required. In such cases, timing and adequate equipment are critical. Endoscopic treatment is successful in about 95% of patients. Severe complications (including oesophageal perforations) are rare. Underlying diseases (including eosinophilic oesophagitis) must be investigated after food bolus impaction. Accidental or suicidal ingestion of corrosive agents may result in severe upper gastrointestinal tract injuries requiring a multidisciplinary approach including gastroenterologists, surgeons, otorhynolaryngologists, anaesthesiologists and psychiatrists. Treatment includes conservative management of patients with mild injuries, while patients with severe injuries undergo emergency surgical exploration. At distance of the ingestion episode, oesophageal reconstruction is required in patients who underwent oesophageal resection and in patients who developed oesophageal strictures that failed dilatation.

Endoscopic therapy in the treatment of caustic esophageal stricture: a retrospective case series study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic procedures, such as balloon/bougie dilation and stent implantation, have gained increasing potential as the treatment of corrosive esophageal stricture. The purpose of the present retrospective case series study was to assess clinical outcomes of endoscopic therapy of esophageal strictures after caustic injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2009, 13 admitted patients that developed esophageal stricture after caustic agent ingestion underwent endoscopic therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Data such as age, gender, caustic agents, site of burn, type of treatment, effectiveness and outcome of endoscopic therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

The average follow up was 39 months with a range of 29-70 months. Successful endoscopic therapy was achieved in 12 of 13 patients (92%). Duration of stricture resolution was between 4 and 48 months (mean, 15 months). Among them, seven patients required dilations only, whereas the other five patients received both dilations and stent implantation. There were no severe complications in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that endoscopic therapy is feasible, less invasive and effective for the management of caustic esophageal stricture. After repeat dilation and stenting, patients can achieve stricture resolution in approximately 15 months and avoid surgery.

Conservative therapeutic approach to corrosive poisonings in adults

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we assess the effectiveness of a conservative therapeutic treatment of acute corrosive poisonings in adults, and we define therapeutic protocols based on clinical and endoscopic criteria.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical records of patients with acute corrosive poisonings who were hospitalized and treated at the Toxicology Clinic at the University of Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, during a 5-year period (2006-2010). A total of 481 patients' records with cases of acute corrosive poisonings were analyzed. There were 317 female (65.9 %) and 164 male (34.1 %) patients. The purpose of the therapy in the cases of acute corrosive poisonings is to prevent perforation as well as progressive fibrosis and stenosis of the esophagus and stomach. Therapeutic approach mainly consists of proton pump inhibitors, H(2) blockers, antibiotics, and intensive hyperalimentation. There are different opinions regarding conservative treatment of acute corrosive poisonings in adults.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study of corrosive poisonings of adults, we propose a list of optimal treatment recommendations.

Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy for caustic injuries

The objective of the study was to compare outcomes of emergency esophagogastrectomy (EGT) and total gastrectomy with immediate esophagojejunostomy (EJ) in patients with full-thickness caustic necrosis of the stomach and mild esophageal injuries. After caustic ingestion, optimal management of the esophageal remnant following removal of the necrotic stomach remains a matter of debate. Between 1987 and 2012, 26 patients (men 38%, median age 44 years) with isolated transmural gastric necrosis underwent EGT (n = 14) or EJ (n = 12). Early and long-term outcomes of both groups were compared. The groups were similar regarding age (P = 0.66), gender (0.24), and severity of esophageal involvement. Functional success was defined as nutritional autonomy after removal of the jejunostomy and tracheotomy tubes. Emergency morbidity (67% vs. 64%, P = 0.80), mortality (17% vs. 7%, P = 0.58), and reoperation rates (25% vs.14%, P = 0.63) were similar after EJ and EGT. One patient (8%) experienced EJ leakage. One patient in the EJ group and 13 patients in the EGT group underwent esophageal reconstruction (P < 0.0001). Aggregate in hospital length of stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent EGT (median 83 [33-201] vs. 36 [10-82] days, P = 0.001). Functional success after EJ and EGT was similar (90% vs.69%, P = 0.34). Immediate EJ can be safely performed after total gastrectomy for caustic injuries and reduces the need of further esophageal reconstruction.