|
1
|
Lim H. [Treatment Strategies for Gastric Cancer Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2024; 84:3-8. [PMID: 39049459 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2024.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Gastric cancer frequently leads to gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), causing significant symptoms and complications. Surgical bypass and stenting are two representative palliative treatments for GOO by gastric cancer. This study reviews clinical guidelines for malignant GOO treatment, highlighting differences in recommendations based on patient survival expectations and systemic health. A meta-analysis of surgical bypass and stenting in gastric cancer patients revealed no significant difference in technical and clinical success rates between the two treatments. However, stenting allowed faster resumption of oral intake and shorter hospital stays but had higher rates of major complications and reobstruction. Despite these differences, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Emerging techniques like EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy show promise but require further research and experienced practitioners. Ultimately, treatment should be tailored to patient preferences and the specific benefits and drawbacks of each method to improve quality of life and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Anyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Takahara N, Nakai Y, Ishida K, Endo G, Kurihara K, Tange S, Takaoka S, Tokito Y, Suzuki Y, Oyama H, Kanai S, Suzuki T, Sato T, Hakuta R, Ishigaki K, Saito T, Hamada T, Fujishiro M. Second Covered and Uncovered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Recurrent Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5241. [PMID: 37629282 PMCID: PMC10455318 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is a current mainstay for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), but symptomatic recurrence due to initial SEMS dysfunction commonly occurs. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of second SEMS for recurrent GOO (RGOO). Methods: Between April 2006 and December 2022, a total of 95 cases with malignant RGOO undergoing second endoscopic SEMS placement were enrolled. Technical and clinical success rates, RGOO, time to RGOO (TRGOO), stent patency rate, adverse events (AE), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively compared between covered and uncovered SEMS (cSEMS/uSEMS) groups. Risk factors for TRGOO were also explored. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between cSEMS (n = 48) and uSEMS (n = 47) groups, except for the causes of the initial SEMS dysfunction. High technical and clinical success rates with a similar incidence of AE (15% vs. 17%, p = 0.78) and OS (median of 101 vs. 102 days, p = 0.68) were achieved in both groups. There were no statistical differences in cumulative incidence of RGOO (19% vs. 13%, p = 0.58), TRGOO (median, not reached in both groups, p = 0.57), and stent patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 months between the groups (60%, 47% and 26%, respectively vs. 70%, 55% and 38%, respectively). However, TRGOO tended to be longer in cSEMS in cases with RGOO due to tumor ingrowth (median, not reached vs. 111 days, p = 0.19). A Cox regression analysis demonstrated that chemotherapy after second SEMS placement was significantly associated with an improved TRGOO (the hazard ratio of 0.27 [95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.93], p = 0.03). Conclusions: Regardless of the type of SEMS, second SEMS placement was similarly safe and effective for RGOO. The type of second SEMS might be considered based on the cause of initial SEMS dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kota Ishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Go Endo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Kohei Kurihara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Shuichi Tange
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Shinya Takaoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Yurie Tokito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Yukari Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Hiroki Oyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Sachiko Kanai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Kazunaga Ishigaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
- Department of Chemotherapy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; (N.T.); (K.I.); (G.E.); (K.K.); (S.T.); (S.T.); (Y.T.); (Y.S.); (H.O.); (S.K.); (T.S.); (T.S.); (R.H.); (K.I.); (T.S.); (T.H.); (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Okamoto T, Sasaki T, Yoshio T, Mori C, Mie T, Furukawa T, Yamada Y, Takeda T, Kasuga A, Matsuyama M, Ozaka M, Fujisaki J, Sasahira N. Outcomes after partially covered self-expandable metal stent placement for recurrent duodenal obstruction. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:319-328. [PMID: 35941307 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09519-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes of partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as an additional stent after recurrent duodenal obstruction (RDO) have not been elucidated. In this study, we compared outcomes of partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement after RDO in patients with malignant duodenal obstruction and explored factors affecting re-recurrent obstruction and overall survival in this population. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing SEMS placement for RDO at a cancer institute in Japan from July 2014 to June 2021. Clinical variables and outcomes of patients undergoing partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement were compared. RESULTS Sixty-one patients underwent SEMS placement after RDO, for which the COMVI stent was used in 38 cases and uncovered stents were used in 23 cases. Stent ingrowth was the most common cause of RDO (51.4%). Stent migration only occurred after partially covered stent placement (20% vs. 0%, p = 0.018). Choice of SEMS had no impact on time to re-RDO (median 2.8 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.776) or overall survival (median 2.6 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.703). Median overall survival was longer in patients receiving chemotherapy after second stenting (4.6 vs. 1.8 months, p < 0.001) and shorter in those with early RDO, regardless of the SEMS used. Use of the partially covered stent had no impact on survival or time to RDO. CONCLUSIONS While outcomes after partially covered SEMS placement for RDO were not significantly different from uncovered SEMS, migration remains a concern when they are used as a second stent. Chemotherapy after second stenting was associated with longer overall survival but not with longer time to re-RDO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Toshiyuki Yoshio
- Upper Gastrointestinal Division, Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Chinatsu Mori
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takafumi Mie
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yuto Yamada
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Junko Fujisaki
- Upper Gastrointestinal Division, Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Zheng F, Ha L, Cui Y. Gastric Outlet Obstruction. TEXTBOOK OF EMERGENCY GENERAL SURGERY 2023:1035-1047. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22599-4_70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
|
5
|
Patita M, Castro R, Libânio D, Bastos RP, Silva R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pimentel-Nunes P. Covered Metal Stent after Dysfunction of Uncovered Stents for Palliation of Gastrointestinal Malignant Obstruction. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 27:383-390. [PMID: 33251287 DOI: 10.1159/000507200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been used for the palliative treatment of malignant gastrointestinal tract obstruction. However, restenosis or incomplete expansion of a first stent is a frequent complication, and the effectiveness of reintervention with placement of a second stent is still controversial. Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of covered SEMS (cSEMS) placement after dysfunction of uncovered SEMS (uSEMS) by the stent-in-stent technique. Patients and Methods We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of patients receiving palliative treatment for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction with cSEMS placement after uSEMS dysfunction in a tertiary center from January 2013 to August 2018. Technical and clinical success, time of patency, and adverse events were analyzed. Results Twelve patients were included; their mean age was 60 ± 9 years. Eleven patients had gastric outlet obstruction, and 1 patient had compression of the transverse colon due to gastric neoplasia. In 5 cases, there was absence of early clinical success with uSEMS and stent dysfunction in 7 cases (median patency time: 81 days). There was 100% technical success and 91.7% clinical success after cSEMS placement. There were no adverse events nor need for reintervention. The median patency time after placement of both stents was 163 days (vs. 71 days with the initial stent). Conclusion cSEMS placement after uSEMS dysfunction is technically feasible and a clinically effective treatment for patients with recurrent malignant gastrointestinal obstruction, with good stent patency in the medium/long term. This approach seems to be safe and without increase in adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Patita
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Rui Castro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Pedro Bastos
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Silva
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Porto, Portugal.,Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Baldaque-Silva F. Stent-in-Stent for Malign Obstruction: Should We Go Back to a Place Where We Were Happy? GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 27:375-377. [PMID: 33251285 PMCID: PMC7670327 DOI: 10.1159/000510739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Jeong SJ, Lee J. Management of gastric outlet obstruction: Focusing on endoscopic approach. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2020; 11:8-16. [PMID: 32550041 PMCID: PMC7288729 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v11.i2.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a medical condition characterized by epigastric pain and postprandial vomiting due to mechanical obstruction. The obstructions typically involved in GOO can be benign or malignant. Peptic ulcer disease is the most common cause of benign GOO, and malignant causes include gastric cancer, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. With the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the use of proton pump inhibitors, the predominant causes have changed from benign to malignant diseases. Treatment of GOO depends on the underlying cause: Proton pump inhibitors, H. pylori eradication, endoscopic treatments including balloon dilatation or the placement of self-expandable stents, or surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Jin Jeong
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan 48108, South Korea
| | - Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan 48108, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Mo JW, Kim YM, Kim JH, Shin SY, Youn YH, Park H. Clinical outcomes after multiple self-expandable metallic stent placement using stent-in-stent technique for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19432. [PMID: 32481247 PMCID: PMC7249911 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used for relieving symptoms in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple gastroduodenal stent placement using the stent-in-stent technique and to identify factors predictive of stent patency.We retrospectively analyzed data from 170 patients with GOO receiving SEMS using the stent-in-stent technique between July 2006 and July 2018. Of these, 90 had been treated with SEMS placement for MGOO. Technical and clinical success rates were evaluated. Clinical outcomes and predictors of stent patency were also analyzed.Second SEMS placement was used in 34.4% of cases and 9.7% were treated with third SEMS placement because of prior stent dysfunction. Median stent patency time was 15.7 weeks for the first SEMS, 10.4 weeks for the second, and 11.3 weeks for the third. The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 97.8% for the first SEMS, 100% and 90.3% for the second, respectively, and both 100% for the third. Multivariable analysis showed that use of covered SEMS and chemotherapy after first and second SEMS placement was significant predictors of stent patency. Serious complications such as bleeding or perforation did not occur in any patient.Second and third gastroduodenal SEMS placement using the stent-in-stent technique is safe and effective for management of first stent dysfunction in MGOO. Stent patency is significantly associated with the use of covered SEMS and chemotherapy after SEMS placement.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Tringali A, Giannetti A, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2019. [PMID: 31263354 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a variety of symptoms. It may be caused by motor disorders and by benign or malignant mechanical disease. Endoscopic management of benign disease is mainly based on balloon dilation, augmented by the use of covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in refractory disease. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used as an alternative method, although more studies with longer follow up are needed before it can be considered as a recommended therapy. Surgery remains the last resort. Endoscopic management of malignant GOO is based on SEMS placement as an alternative to palliative surgery, because it is a cost-effective method. The use of a covered or uncovered stent depends on patient-related variables, which include the stricture site, concomitant involvement of the bile duct, the patient's prognosis, probably the tumor type, and the use of chemotherapy. EUS-GE is a promising technique but needs more studies with longer follow up before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Tringali
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Aurora Giannetti
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti).,Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (DI.BI.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology, and Hepatology Department, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah USA (Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Tringali A, Giannetti A, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:330-337. [PMID: 31263354 PMCID: PMC6595925 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a variety of symptoms. It may be caused by motor disorders and by benign or malignant mechanical disease. Endoscopic management of benign disease is mainly based on balloon dilation, augmented by the use of covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in refractory disease. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used as an alternative method, although more studies with longer follow up are needed before it can be considered as a recommended therapy. Surgery remains the last resort. Endoscopic management of malignant GOO is based on SEMS placement as an alternative to palliative surgery, because it is a cost-effective method. The use of a covered or uncovered stent depends on patient-related variables, which include the stricture site, concomitant involvement of the bile duct, the patient’s prognosis, probably the tumor type, and the use of chemotherapy. EUS-GE is a promising technique but needs more studies with longer follow up before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Tringali
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Aurora Giannetti
- Endoscopy Unit Surgical Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy (Alberto Tringali, Aurora Giannetti).,Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (DI.BI.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Aurora Giannetti)
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology, and Hepatology Department, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah USA (Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Shi D, Liu J, Hu X, Liu Y, Ji F, Bao Y, Guo D. Comparison of big funnel and individualized stents for management of stomach cancer with gastric outlet obstruction. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13194. [PMID: 30508898 PMCID: PMC6283228 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies reported a similar rate of complications, including stent migration and obstruction, between individualized stents and the standard uncovered stents in gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by distal stomach cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of funnel stents for management of GOO caused by distal stomach cancer. METHODS This study was designed as a multicenter, controlled, prospective, and randomized clinical trial involving 4 hospitals. The individualized stent group (44 cases) received cup and funnel covered stents, and the funnel group (44 cases) received only funnel covered stents for management of GOO caused by distal gastric cancer. RESULTS All patients with GOO were treated with cup and funnel stents according to their assigned groups. The rate of GOO resolution was 100% in the funnel group and 97.7% in the individualized stent group. Stent obstruction caused by tumor ingrowth was observed in 1 patient in the individualized stent group, and proximal partial stent migration was observed in 1 patient in each group. Stent obstruction caused by tumor ingrowth was observed in 1 patient in the individualized stent group. There was no statistical difference in stent migration, obstruction, and survival between groups. CONCLUSION Big funnel stents and individualized stents resulted in similar shaping effect and prevention of stent migration and obstruction, suggesting that funnel shaped stents can be used to treat cup or funnel shaped GOO caused by distal stomach cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Jianping Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Xujun Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo
| | - Yongpan Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District
| | - Feng Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
| | - Yinsu Bao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Daxin Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Ye BW, Chou CK, Hsieh YC, Li CP, Chao Y, Hou MC, Lin HC, Lee KC. Metallic Stent Expansion Rate at Day One Predicts Stent Patency in Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:1286-1294. [PMID: 28315029 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4534-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Self-expandable metallic stent insertion has been a mainstream treatment for relieving the obstructive symptoms of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO), a late-stage complication of gastrointestinal malignancies. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of stent expansion rates in clinical outcomes in patients with MGOO. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with inoperable MGOO receiving metallic stents were reviewed retrospectively from April 2010 to December 2014. Clinical outcomes, predictors of stent patency, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS The technical and clinical success rates were 100 and 94.3%, respectively. The median stent patency time was 114 days (range 13-570 days). The median survival time was 133 days (range 13-1145 days). Stent dysfunctions occurred in 28 patients (32.2%), with restenosis accounting for the majority (82%). The stent expansion rate ≥75% at Day 1 predicted the stent patency [hazard ratio (HR) 0.12, P = 0.04]. However, it did not correlate with survival. Non-gastric cancer origins (HR 2.41, P = 0.002) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR 2.54, P = 0.001) correlated with poor survival. However, post-stent chemotherapy (HR 0.55, P = 0.03) was related to better outcome. The comparison of clinical outcomes of first and second stent insertions showed no significant difference in the stent expansion rate either at Day 0 and Day 1 (P = 0.97 and P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS Self-expandable metallic stent insertion is a safe and effective treatment for relieving the obstructive symptoms. The stent expansion rate ≥75% at Day 1 is a novel stent-related predictor of stent patency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing-Wei Ye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Kai Chou
- Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Ilan, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Cheng Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Pin Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yee Chao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chih Hou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Endoscopic Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Chieh Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuei-Chuan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Kato H, Tsutsumi K, Okada H. Recent advancements in stent therapy in patients with malignant gastroduodenal outlet obstruction. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:186. [PMID: 28616401 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is one of severe comorbidities caused by many kinds of malignant diseases and is associated with not only degradation of patients' quality of life but also mortality. Although surgical bypass is one of the main therapies for malignant GOO, it is often difficult to perform in end-stage patients. The deployment of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) has recently become a viable alternative to surgical bypass for malignant GOO. This technique is less invasive and more effective, particularly in patients with poor prognoses. Many reports have referred to the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the placement of SEMSs for malignant GOO. According to these reports, the rates of technical and clinical success were reported to be relatively high and the rate of adverse events to be acceptable. However, precautions against severe adverse events such as massive bleeding and perforation are necessary. Several reports have described the differences in clinical results among different kinds of SEMSs. The presence of a covered design for SEMSs may affect the patency of SEMSs and the rate of stent dysfunction. Selection of the SEMS according to axial force may affect successful achievement of long patency of SEMSs and avoidance of gastroduodenal perforation at the bending site of the duodenum. Compared with high technical success rates nearing 100%, clinical success rates were usually lower than technical success. Therefore, determination of predictive factors for failure of clinical success is important. Several papers reported that low performance status could be associated with failure of clinical success. However, the association of clinical success with other factors such as carcinomatosa and ascites remains controversial, which is a problem to be solved. Reintervention with SEMS using the stent-in-stent method after stent dysfunction can be performed effectively as well as placement of the first SEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironari Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Tsutsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Novel Treatment of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction With a Stent-Within-Stent Approach Secured With Apollo OverStitch™. ACG Case Rep J 2016; 3:e130. [PMID: 27807582 PMCID: PMC5062678 DOI: 10.14309/crj.2016.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
|
|
15
|
Lopera JE, Gregorio MAD, Laborda A, Casta?o R. Enteral stents: Complications and their management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2016. [DOI: 10.18528/gii160005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge E. Lopera
- Department of Radiology, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Alicia Laborda
- Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Group (GITMI), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Casta?o
- Gastrohepatology Group, Universidad de Antioquia, Medell?n, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Oh SY, Kozarek RA. Management of gastroduodenal stent-related complications. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2015. [DOI: 10.18528/gii150008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Y. Oh
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard A. Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
van Halsema EE, Rauws EAJ, Fockens P, van Hooft JE. Self-expandable metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A pooled analysis of prospective literature. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12468-81. [PMID: 26604654 PMCID: PMC4649130 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To provide an overview of the clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed of the literature published between January 2009 and March 2015. Only prospective studies that reported on the clinical success of stent placement for MGOO were included. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined according to the definition used in the original article. Data were pooled and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Subgroup analyses were performed for partially covered SEMSs (PCSEMSs) and uncovered SEMSs (UCSEMSs) using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 19 studies, including 1281 patients, were included in the final analysis. Gastric (42%) and pancreatic (37%) cancer were the main causes of MGOO. UCSEMSs were used in 76% of patients and PCSEMSs in 24%. The overall pooled technical success rate was 97.3% and the clinical success rate was 85.7%. Stent dysfunction occurred in 19.6% of patients, mainly caused by re-obstruction (12.6%) and stent migration (4.3%), and was comparable between PCSEMSs and UCSEMSs (21.2% vs 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.412). Re-obstruction was more common with UCSEMSs (14.9% vs 5.1%, P < 0.001) and stent migration was more frequent after PCSEMS placement (10.9% vs 2.2%, P < 0.001). The overall perforation rate was 1.2%. Bleeding was reported in 4.1% of patients, including major bleeding in 0.8%. The median stent patency ranged from 68 to 307 d in five studies. The median overall survival ranged from 49 to 183 d in 13 studies. CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes in this large population showed that enteral stent placement was feasible, effective and safe. Therefore, stent placement is a valid treatment option for the palliation of MGOO.
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Clinical outcomes of re-stenting in patients with stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1372-9. [PMID: 26139493 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4338-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/13/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been used for the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of salvage SEMS for stent malfunction and to identify the prognostic factors for a longer patency. METHODS A total of 108 patients who underwent a secondary salvage SEMS placement for a primary stent malfunction were retrospectively reviewed at the Seoul National University Hospital between August 2004 and May 2013. The duration of patency for salvage SEMS was defined as the time between salvage SEMS placement and the recurrence of obstructive symptoms that were confirmed either endoscopically or radiologically. RESULTS The technical and clinical success rates for salvage SEMS were 100 and 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.0-89.0), respectively. A salvage SEMS malfunction occurred in 29 (26.9%) of the 108 patients. The median duration of patency for salvage SEMS was 59.5 days (range 3-928, 95% CI 73.7-118.3). Longer SEMS patencies of more than 60 days were significantly associated with palliative chemotherapy (odds ratio = 2.539, 95% CI 1.031-6.252, p = .043). For salvage SEMS, covered-uncovered stents had a longer patency duration, as compared with other combinations of primary and salvage stent types. CONCLUSIONS Longer patency durations for salvage SEMS were associated with palliative chemotherapy after salvage SEMS insertion. Salvage SEMS could be a feasible and effective treatment for primary stent malfunction in malignant GOO.
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction with simultaneous endoscopic insertion of afferent and efferent jejunal limb enteral stents in patients with recurrent malignancy. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:521-525. [PMID: 26091983 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4234-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with prior pancreaticobiliary or distal gastric cancer treated surgically may have local anastomotic recurrence with obstruction of the afferent and efferent jejunal limbs. This report describes the efficacy and safety of simultaneous endoscopic insertion of self-expanding metal stents into the afferent and efferent jejunal limbs in patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) of post-surgical anatomy for palliation of recurrent malignancy. METHODS Patients were identified from an endoscopic database at a specialized cancer center between September 2007 and March 2014. Technical success was defined as single-session insertion of afferent and efferent jejunal limb enteral stents. Clinical success was defined as immediate symptom relief and ability to advance diet. A durable response was defined as symptom relief of at least 60 days or until hospice placement or death. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were identified who underwent insertion of two 22-mm-diameter uncovered duodenal stents. Stent length varied from 60 to 120 mm. Stents were placed under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Three patients required balloon dilation to facilitate stent insertion. Average procedure time was 58.8 min (range 28-120). Technical success was achieved in 23/24 (96%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 19/23 (83%) patients. Following initial stent insertion and prior to subsequent re-intervention, 11/19 (58%) patients had a durable response with a median duration of 70 days (range 4-315). Eight (42%) patients underwent subsequent re-intervention at a median of 22 days (range 11-315). Five patients had stent revision and were able to tolerate oral intake. Two patients had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy insertion. One patient required surgical diversion for persistent obstruction. Complications included stent migration and post-stent insertion bacteremia due to food bolus obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent malignant GOO in patients with post-surgical anatomy treated with simultaneous endoscopic enteral stenting of afferent and efferent jejunal limbs has a high rate of technical and clinical success and low rate of complications and provides effective palliation.
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, Takahara N, Hamada T, Mizuno S, Mohri D, Yagioka H, Kogure H, Arizumi T, Togawa O, Matsubara S, Ito Y, Yamamoto N, Sasahira N, Hirano K, Toda N, Tada M, Koike K. Clinical outcomes of secondary gastroduodenal self-expandable metallic stent placement by stent-in-stent technique for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Dig Endosc 2015; 27:37-43. [PMID: 24995858 DOI: 10.1111/den.12321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secondary gastroduodenal stent placement after first stent dysfunction for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of secondary stent-in-stent gastroduodenal stent placement. RESULTS Among 260 patients who had been treated with first gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, 29 patients (11.2%) were treated with secondary gastroduodenal stent placement because of first stent dysfunction. Pancreatic cancer was the major primary cancer (55.2%). A WallFlex duodenal stent was the most frequently inserted stent both as a first stent (75.9%) and as a secondary stent (62.1%). There were 22 patients (75.9%) that received gastroduodenal stents at the bending site (supraduodenal angle or infraduodenal angle). Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 86.2%, respectively. Median eating period was 3.0 months, and median survival time was 3.5 months. As for related complications, gastrointestinal perforation, insufficient stent expansion, tumor ingrowth, tumor overgrowth, and cholangitis were experienced in 13.8% (four cases), 6.9% (two cases), 6.9% (two cases), 3.4% (one case), and 3.4% (one case), respectively. CONCLUSION Secondary gastroduodenal stent placement might be effective for managing first stent dysfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. However, gastrointestinal perforation was the major complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Endoscopic bilio-duodenal bypass: outcomes of primary and revision efficacy of combined metallic stents in malignant duodenal and biliary obstructions. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59:2779-89. [PMID: 24821464 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3199-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) can be used for palliation of combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions. However, the results of the concomitant stent placement for the duration of the patients' lives, as well as the need for and efficacy of endoscopic revision, are unclear. AIM This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of SEMS placement for combined biliary and duodenal obstructions throughout the patients' lives and the need for endoscopic revision. METHODS This study is a retrospective multicenter study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous or sequential SEMS placement for malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions. The data were collected to analyze the sustained relief of obstructive symptoms until the patients' death and the efficacy of endoscopic revision, as well as stent patency, adverse events, survival and prognostic factors for stent patency. RESULTS Technical and immediate clinical success was achieved in all of the patients. Duodenal stricture occurred before the papilla in 35 patients (70 %), involved the papilla in 11 patients (22 %) and was observed distal to the papilla in four patients (8 %). Initial biliary stenting was performed endoscopically in 42 patients (84 %) and percutaneously in eight patients. After combined stenting, 30 patients (60 %) required no additional intervention until the time of their death. The remaining 20 patients were successfully treated using endoscopic stent reinsertion: nine patients needed biliary revision, three patients needed duodenal restenting and eight patients needed both biliary and duodenal reinsertion. The median duodenal stent patency and median biliary stent patency were 34 and 27 weeks, respectively. The median survival after combined stent placement was 18 weeks. A Cox multivariate analysis showed that duodenal stent obstruction after combined stenting was a risk factor for biliary stent obstruction (hazard ratio 6.85; 95 % confidence interval 1.43-198.98; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic bilio-duodenal bypass is clinically effective, and the majority of the patients need no additional intervention until their death. Endoscopic revision is feasible and has a high success rate.
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Bosscher MRF, van Leeuwen BL, Hoekstra HJ. Surgical emergencies in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40:1028-36. [PMID: 24933674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2014] [Revised: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
An oncologic emergency is defined as an acute, potentially life threatening condition in a cancer patient that has developed as a result of the malignant disease or its treatment. Many oncologic emergencies are signs of advanced, end-stage malignant disease. Oncologic emergencies can be divided into medical or surgical. The literature was reviewed to construct a summary of potential surgical emergencies in oncology that any surgeon can be confronted with in daily practice, and to offer insight into the current approach for these wide ranged emergencies. Cancer patients can experience symptoms of obstruction of different structures and various causes. Obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract is the most frequent condition seen in surgical practice. Further surgical emergencies include infections due to immune deficiency, perforation of the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding events, and pathological fractures. For the institution of the appropriate treatment for any emergency, it is important to determine the underlying cause, since emergencies can be either benign or malignant of origin. Some emergencies are well managed with conservative or non-invasive treatment, whereas others require emergency surgery. The patient's performance status, cancer stage and prognosis, type and severity of the emergency, and the patient's wishes regarding invasiveness of treatment are essential during the decision making process for optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R F Bosscher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BA31, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - B L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BA31, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - H J Hoekstra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BA31, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|