Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for relative indication early gastric cancer in nonsurgical candidates

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is effective in treating early gastric cancer (EGC). Its role in patients with comorbidities along with more advanced disease is unknown. We sought to evaluate this in a large Western cohort.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for EGC in a single tertiary Western endoscopy center over 10 years were prospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) up to 5 years. Secondary outcomes were efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

ESD for 157 cases of EGC in 149 patients was performed in an elderly and comorbid cohort with a mean age of 73.7 years and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4.2. Over a median follow-up of 51.6 months, no significant differences were found in 5-year OS (88.9% vs 77.9%, P = .290) and DFS (83.2% vs 75.1%, P = .593) between absolute indication EGC and relative indication (RI) EGC. The absolute indication EGC cohort achieved higher en bloc (96.3% vs 87.5%, P = .069) and R0 resection rates (93.6% vs 62.5%, P < .001) when compared with RI EGC. No significant differences were found in SAEs (7.3% vs 12.5%, P = .363). No mortality or surgical resection ensued from adverse events from ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD safely confers DFS in poor surgical candidates with RI EGC in a large Western cohort. Patients who are elderly and/or with comorbidities or who decline surgical resection may benefit from ESD and avoid the risks of surgery and its long-term sequelae. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306707.).

The long-term outcome and risk factors of histologic discrepancy between forceps biopsies and endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer: An observational study

Although endoscopic forceps biopsy is the gold standard for early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis, the method can cause endoscopic resection of specimens and histological discrepancies. This study aims to examine the risk factors for histological discrepancies in EGC and long-term clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with differentiated-type EGC using forceps biopsy. Patients without histological discrepancies and with undifferentiated types in endoscopic resection histology were categorized into the concordant and discordant groups, respectively. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes related to histological discrepancies were analyzed. A total of 957 lesions from 936 patients were enrolled. An overall discrepancy rate of 8.7% was confirmed, with an undifferentiated-type discrepancy of 5.5%. The discordant group showed a higher tendency for lesions to be located in the upper third region, to have whitish discoloration, and to undergo a greater number of biopsies compared with the concordant group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that lesion location in the upper third region (odds ratio [OR]: 2.125; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.032-5.277; P = .041) and whitish surface discoloration (OR: 13.615; 95% CI: 6.028-28.728; P = .001) were significantly correlated with histologic discrepancy. Compared with the concordant group, the discordant group had a lower curative resection rate, but no differences were observed in complications, local recurrence, or survival rates. Upper third location and whitish discoloration were risk factors for the histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types in patients with EGC. For curative resections performed in patients with EGC and histologic discrepancies and without additional treatment, careful follow-up is possible.

Pathology and Clinical Relevance of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia

Gastric dysplasia is defined as an unequivocally neoplastic epithelium. Dysplastic lesions are characterized by cellular atypia reflective of abnormal differentiation and disorganized glandular architecture. The last few years have been marked by a refinement of the prognosis and risk of progression of gastric dysplasia and the recognition of novel morphologic patterns of dysplasia. Determination of the correct diagnosis and grade of dysplasia are critical steps since it will be predicting the risk of malignant transformation and help tailor appropriate surveillance strategy. This review describes the morphologic characteristics of conventional dysplasia and nonconventional gastric dysplasia that have been more recently characterized.

Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of gastric cancer

Endoscopic treatment, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection, has become the primary treatment for early gastric cancer. A comprehensive optical assessment, including white light endoscopy, image-enhanced endoscopy, and magnification, are the cornerstones for clinical staging and determining the resectability of lesions. This paper discusses factors that influence the indication for endoscopic resection and the likelihood of achieving a curative resection. Our review stresses the critical need for interpreting the histopathological report in accordance with clinical guidelines and the imperative of tailoring decisions based on the patients' and lesions' characteristics and preferences. Moreover, we offer guidance on managing complex scenarios, such as those involving non-curative resection. Finally, we identify future research avenues, including the role of artificial intelligence in estimating the depth of invasion and the urgent need to refine predictive scores for lymph node metastasis and metachronous lesions.

Predictors of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric neoplasia in the West: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine long-term outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Western settings based on the latest Japanese indication criteria, and to examine predictors of outcomes and complications.

METHODS

Data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing gastric ESD at four participating centers from 2009 to 2021. Retrospective analysis using logistic regression and survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

415 patients were included (mean age 71.7 years; 56.4 % male). Absolute indication criteria (2018 guideline) were met in 75.3 % of patients. Median follow-up was 52 months. Post-resection histology was adenocarcinoma, high grade dysplasia, and low grade dysplasia in 49.9 %, 22.7 %, and 17.1 %, respectively. Perforation, early and delayed bleeding occurred in 2.4 %, 4.3 %, and 3.4 %, respectively. Rates of en bloc and R0 resection, and recurrence on first endoscopic follow-up were 94.7 %, 83.4 %, and 2.7 %, respectively. Relative indication (2018 guideline) for ESD was associated with R1 outcome (P = 0.02). Distal location (P = 0.002) and increased procedure time (P = 0.04) were associated with bleeding, and scarring (P = 0.009) and increased procedure duration (P = 0.003) were associated with perforation. Recurrence-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 94 % and 83 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest Western multicenter cohort and suggests that gastric ESD is safe and effective in the Western setting. A quarter of patients fell outside the new absolute indications for ESD, suggesting that Western practice involves more advanced lesions. We identified the predictors of complications, which should help to inform future Western practice and research.

Feasibility for the application of expanded endoscopic resection criteria in mucosal undifferentiated gastric cancer

BACKGROUND & AIM

The indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for mucosal undifferentiated early gastric cancer (EGC) remains controversial because of risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in mucosal undifferentiated EGC, and further to confirm feasibility of the ESD for the treatment of mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection of T1a stage primary gastric adenocarcinoma at three medical centers between 2012 and 2022. We evaluated the frequency of lymph node metastasis and the associated risk factors, as well as the lymph node metastasis rate in the expanded indication of mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

RESULTS

A total of 100 surgically treated patients with mucosal undifferentiated EGC were enrolled. LNM was irrelevant to the age, tumor size, location, and macroscopic type (all P > 0.05), while it was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI, P ＜0.001). And logistic regression analysis showed that the LVI was the only significant risk factors for LNM (OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.06-0.204; P ＜0.001). Of 44 mucosal undifferentiated EGC patients satisfying the expanded indication of ESD, 3 patients (6.8%) showed LN metastasis, all of them with undifferentiated cancer without ulceration, less than 2.0 cm in size.

CONCLUSIONS

Because LNM is present in mucosal undifferentiated EGC patients who satisfied the expanded indication of ESD, ESD cannot be considered a better choice than surgery for all undifferentiated EGC patients. LVI was significant risk factors for LNM in patients with mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

Diagnosis and segmentation effect of the ME-NBI-based deep learning model on gastric neoplasms in patients with suspected superficial lesions - a multicenter study

Background

Endoscopically visible gastric neoplastic lesions (GNLs), including early gastric cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia, should be accurately diagnosed and promptly treated. However, a high rate of missed diagnosis of GNLs contributes to the potential risk of the progression of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the diagnosis and segmentation of GNLs under magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in patients with suspected superficial lesions.

Methods

ME-NBI images of patients with GNLs in two centers were retrospectively analysed. Two convolutional neural network (CNN) modules were developed and trained on these images. CNN1 was trained to diagnose GNLs, and CNN2 was trained for segmentation. An additional internal test set and an external test set from another center were used to evaluate the diagnosis and segmentation performance.

Results

CNN1 showed a diagnostic performance with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.8%, 92.5%, 89.0%, 89.4% and 92.2%, respectively, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.928 in the internal test set. With CNN1 assistance, all endoscopists had a higher accuracy than for an independent diagnosis. The average intersection over union (IOU) between CNN2 and the ground truth was 0.5837, with a precision, recall and the Dice coefficient of 0.776, 0.983 and 0.867, respectively.

Conclusions

This CAD system can be used as an auxiliary tool to diagnose and segment GNLs, assisting endoscopists in more accurately diagnosing GNLs and delineating their extent to improve the positive rate of lesion biopsy and ensure the integrity of endoscopic resection.

Confusion and prospects for carcinogenesis of gastric adenoma and dysplasia: What is the correct answer currently?

There are differences in the diagnoses of superficial gastric lesions between Japan and other countries. In Japan, superficial gastric lesions are classified as adenoma or cancer. Conversely, outside Japan, the same lesion is classified as low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia, or invasive neoplasia. Gastric carcinogenesis occurs mostly de novo, and the adenoma-carcinoma sequence does not appear to be the main pathway of carcinogenesis. Superficial gastric tumors can be roughly divided into the APC mutation type and the TP53 mutation type, which are mutually exclusive. APC-type tumors have low malignancy and develop into LGD, whereas TP53-type tumors have high malignancy and are considered cancerous even if small. For lesions diagnosed as category 3 or 4 in the Vienna classification, it is desirable to perform complete en bloc resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection followed by staging. If there is lymphovascular or submucosal invasion after mucosal resection, additional surgical treatment of gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is required. In such cases, function-preserving curative gastrectomy guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy may be a good alternative.

Chinese integrated guideline on the management of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions

The standardized diagnosis and management of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions are important to prevent gastric cancer. This guideline, created by 5 traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine associations, based on the current morbidity and diagnosis and treatment of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions, provides specific key points and strategies for diagnosis and treatment in the following five aspects: definition and epidemiology, diagnosis and stage, surveillance, treatment and efficacy evaluation. It is hoped that these aspects, assessed by integrating Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine and involving multidisciplinary participation, will play a guiding role in clinical diagnosis and treatment and achieve effective secondary prevention of gastric cancer.

Establishment and Validation of a Pathologic Upgrade Prediction Nomogram Model for Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients After the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

As yet, there is no unified method of treatment for the evaluation and management of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) worldwide.

METHODS

Patients with gastric LGIN who had been treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication were gathered retrospectively. Based on several relevant characteristics described and analyzed by LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression, a prediction nomogram model was established. C-index, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were adopted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients with LGIN were randomly divided into the training groups and the validation groups. LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression identified that 6 variables including gender, size, location, borderline, number, and erosion were independent risk factors. The nomogram model displayed good discrimination with a C-index of .765 (95% confidence interval: .702-.828). The accuracy and reliability of the model were also verified by an AUC of .764 in the training group and .757 in the validation group. Meanwhile, the calibration curve and the DCA suggested that the predictive nomogram had promising accuracy and clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive nomogram model was constructed and proved to be clinically applicable to identify high-risk groups with possible pathologic upgrade in patients with gastric LGIN. Since it is regarded that strengthening follow-up or endoscopic treatment of high-risk patients may contribute to improving the detection rate or reducing the incidence of gastric cancer, the predictive nomogram model provides a reliable basis for the treatment of LGIN.

Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens

Background

It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens.

Methods

A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology.

Results

The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; p < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; p < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; p = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; p < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; p < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; p = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; p < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies.

Conclusion

NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology.

Comparison of endoscopic treatments for small gastric adenomas

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenomas can be successfully treated with endoscopic resection, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ESD and EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) in the treatment of small gastric adenomas.

METHODS

This study included 1014 gastric adenomas ≤ 15 mm in diameter treated with ESD or EMR-P from 2012 to 2019, retrospectively. Propensity score matching between the ESD and EMR-P groups (1:1 to 3:1) was performed according to age, sex, tumor size, tumor location (upper, middle, and lower thirds), morphology, and preprocedural histology. The procedure time and the rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, adverse events, and local recurrence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 478 lesions (ESD: 295, EMR-P: 183) were analyzed. The rates of en bloc resection (94.9% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.498), complete resection (93.6% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.177), bleeding (8.1% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.063), and local recurrence (0.0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.185) did not significantly differ between the two groups. The procedure time was significantly longer for ESD than for EMR-P (p < 0.001). In the EMR-P group, the complete resection rate was significantly lower in the upper third than in the middle and lower thirds (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EMR-P is as effective as ESD for the treatment of small gastric adenomas. However, the efficacy of EMR-P is lower for gastric adenomas in the proximal stomach.

Discrepancy Between Forceps Biopsy and Resection in Colorectal Polyps: A 1686 Paired Screening-Therapeutic Colonoscopic Finding

Purpose

To identify pathology discrepancy between forceps biopsies and polypectomy specimens in colorectal polyps, as well as the reliability of biopsy-based treatment strategy.

Methods

All endoscopic polypectomy cases with forceps biopsies performed within 6 months were included in the study. The biopsies were compared with polypectomy specimens in terms of concordance of histological diagnosis. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the independent predictors of upgrade in histological diagnosis compared with concordance in histological diagnosis.

Results

A total of 1686 paired screening-therapeutic colonoscopies and 1739 paired biopsy-polypectomy specimens were enrolled in the study. The grade of dysplasia in 84.5% of biopsy specimens were concordant to polypectomy specimens, but this proportion decreased to 75.4% when the specimens were classified using tubular or villousness structure. 10.1% and 5.4% of biopsy specimens were upgraded and downgraded in assessing grade of dysplasia, respectively, while 14.3% and 10.3% of biopsy specimens were upgraded and downgraded in assessing tubular or villousness structure, respectively. In subgroup analysis stratified by size of polyps, 9.0% and 10.6% of biopsies obtained from polyps smaller than 10 mm were upgraded in assessing dysplasia and tubular or villousness structure, respectively. This proportion increased to 10.7% and 21.3%, respectively, in biopsies obtained from polyps larger than 10 mm. Larger size of polyps and pedunculated polyps were associated with a higher incidence of upgrade in histological diagnosis. Nearly 25% of biopsy specimens with high-grade dysplasia were identified as adenocarcinoma in polypectomy specimens.

Conclusion

The concordance between biopsy and polypectomy specimens is not adequate. The biopsy-based treatment strategy is not reliable and should not be considered as an indicator for further treatment, particularly in large or pedunculated polyps.

Endoscopic detection of esophageal low-grade squamous dysplasia: How to predict pathologic upgrades before treatment?

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to predict the risk factors related to histopathologic upgrade after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with pre-ESD esophageal squamous low-grade intraepithelial neoplasm (LGIN).

METHODS

A training cohort of 201 patients with biopsy-confirmed esophageal squamous LGIN and underwent ESD at a tertiary medical center between January 2017 and July 2019 were included. Risk factors for histological upgrade were identified using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. A nomogram was then established. Internal validation was evaluated by discrimination, calibration plot, and decision-curve analysis. Another cohort of 48 patients were prospectively collected from July 2019 to June 2021 for external validation of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The rate of histological upgrade was 34.8% (70/201) and 27.1% (13/48) in the training and validation sets, respectively. LASSO regression identified that tumor area (mm² ) per biopsy, Lugol's staining pattern, background coloration, and the circumferential range of the lesion were significantly associated with histological upgrade. The final nomogram attained favorable prediction efficacy in the training cohort (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-0.98) and validation cohort (AUROC 0.92, 95% CI 0.79 -0.99). This model generated well-fitted calibration and clinical-decision curves in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram may better guide clinical decision on whether performing EDS or follow-up for suspicious lesions in patients with biopsy-confirmed esophageal squamous LGIN.

Clinical efficacy and prognostic risk factors of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported in the treatment of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). However, its efficacy and prognostic risk factors have not been well analyzed.

AIM

To explore the efficacy and prognostic risk factors of RFA for gastric LGIN in a large, long-term follow-up clinical study.

METHODS

The clinical data of 271 consecutive cases from 198 patients who received RFA for treatment of gastric LGIN at the Chinese PLA General Hospital from October 2014 to October 2020 were reviewed in this retrospective study. Data on operative parameters, complications, and follow-up outcomes including curative rates were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The curative rates of endoscopic RFA for gastric LGIN at 3 mo, 6 mo, and 1-5 years after the operation were 93.3%, 92.8%, 91.5%, 90.3%, 88.5%, 85.7%, and 83.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and disease duration > 1 year had a significant effect on the curative rate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013, respectively). None of patients had bleeding, perforation, infection, or other serious complications after RFA, and the main discomfort was postoperative abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

RFA was safe and effective for gastric LGIN during long-term follow-up. H. pylori infection and disease course > 1 year may be the main risk factors for relapse of LGIN after RFA.

Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biopsy can underestimate gastric malignancies as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). Definitively diagnosed LGIN would progress. This study aimed to evaluate predictive factors to identify malignancies misdiagnosed as LGIN by biopsy and LGIN at high risk of progression.

METHODS

The clinical records of patients diagnosed with gastric LGIN by endoscopic biopsy who underwent at least two endoscopies during the first year of follow-up between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Three endoscopists reviewed photographs of the initial endoscopy, described lesion characteristics, and made endoscopic diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors to identify malignancies underestimated as LGIN. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these predictors. Patient clinical outcomes of follow-up >1 year were collected. Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze predictors of progression.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 of 182 (26.4%) patients were proven to have malignancies. A single lesion, a large lesion size, and marked intestinal metaplasia (IM) were independent predictors of initially misdiagnosed malignancies. The area under the curve of these predictors was 0.871, with a sensitivity of 68.7% and specificity of 92.5%. Twelve of 98 patients (12.2%) progressed during the 33-month median follow-up period. A whitish appearance, irregular margins, marked IM, and histological diagnosis of LGIN more than twice within the first year were predictors for progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions diagnosed as LGIN by biopsy with marked IM and other predictors above should be prudently treated for high potential to be malignancies or progress. Endoscopic follow-up with repeated biopsies within the first year is recommended.

Risk factors for the histologic discrepancy of gastric adenomatous lesions and long-term outcome

Although endoscopic forceps biopsies (EFB) have a significant role in diagnosing gastric adenoma, there are still discrepancies between EFBs and finalized pathology results.Therefore, the objective of this study was to find the risk factors that cause this discrepancy and to analyze the effects of this discrepancy on the long-term outcome.In this study patients that had received endoscopic resection due to low-grade gastric adenoma diagnosis from EFB between January of 2011 and January of 2018 at the Chungnam National University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether there was histological discrepancy the cumulative incidence of the metachronous lesions were analyzed.A total of 745 lesions diagnosed as low-grade gastric adenoma at EFB were enrolled, and the final pathology results were confirmed to be non-neoplastic (n = 19), low-grade adenoma (n = 614), High-grade adenoma (n = 63), and carcinoma (n = 49), and with the exception of non-neoplastic lesion, the results confirmed 84.6% (n = 614) for the concordant group and 15.4% (n = 112) for the discordant. The results of the multivariate analysis confirmed that depressed lesion (odds ratio [OR]: 2.056; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.130-3.451; P = .011), erythema (OR: 2.546; 95% CI: 1.604-4.030; P = .004), and a size >1.5 cm (OR: 1.903; 95% CI: 1.102-3.172; P = .018) were risk factors for discrepancy. The results also confirmed that for the average observation period of (SD) 39.12 (12.31) months, the cumulative incidence of metachronous neoplasm had a higher significance (P = 0.001) in the discordant group when compared to that of the concordant group.The factors related to the histologic discrepancy of low-grade gastric adenoma were depressed lesion, erythema and size >1.5 cm. In the groups with histological discrepancy, the cumulative incidence of the metachronous neoplasm was significantly higher and therefore closer observation of such patients after performing endoscopic resection is necessary.

Usefulness of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Diagnosing Mixed Poorly Differentiated Gastric Cancers

INTRODUCTION

Curative rates of endoscopic treatment for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC), particularly mixed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (MIXED-POR), are lower than those of endoscopic treatment for the differentiated type. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is useful for diagnoses of the histological type. This study aimed to investigate the detection rates of MIXED-POR among undifferentiated-type EGCs using biopsy and ME-NBI in order to improve curative rates through endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed 267 lesions initially subjected to endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and histologically diagnosed as undifferentiated-type EGCs between July 2005 and December 2016 at our hospital. We obtained written informed consent from all participants. Biopsy and ME-NBI findings were compared to distinguish pure signet ring cell carcinoma (PURE-SIG) and MIXED-POR. ME-NBI findings were divided into 2 categories depending on the presence of irregular vessels. Results of biopsy and ME-NBI (combination method) were also analyzed, and detection rates of MIXED-POR and PURE-SIG were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

Overall, 114 lesions were analyzed. Fifty-eight lesions (50.9%) were identified as MIXED-POR. With biopsy, the detection rate of MIXED-POR was significantly lower than that of PURE-SIG (p < 0.0001). ME-NBI detected significantly more MIXED-POR with irregular vessels than PURE-SIG (p < 0.0001). The combination method could detect significantly more MIXED-POR than PURE-SIG (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and accuracy for MIXED-POR diagnosis were significantly higher with the combination method than with biopsy alone (p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Combining biopsy and ME-NBI improved the accuracy of pretreatment diagnosis before ESD in undifferentiated-type cancer.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Low-Grade Dysplasia and High-Grade Dysplasia on Gastric Pretreatment Biopsy: Korea ESD Study Group

Background/Aims

Some cases of gastric low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on forceps biopsy (FB) are diagnosed as gastric cancer (GC) after endoscopic resection (ER). This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ER for gastric LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB and to identify the factors that predict pathologic upstaging to GC.

Methods

Patients who underwent ER for LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB from March 2005 to February 2018 in 14 hospitals in South Korea were enrolled, and the patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

This study included 2,150 cases of LGD and 1,534 cases of HGD diagnosed by pretreatment FB. In total, 589 of 2,150 LGDs (27.4%) were diagnosed as GC after ER. Helicobacterpylori infection, smoking history, tumor location in the lower third of the stomach, tumor size >10 mm, depressed lesion, and ulceration significantly predicted GC. A total of 1,115 out of 1,534 HGDs (72.7%) were diagnosed with GC after ER. Previous history of GC, H. pylori infection, smoking history, tumor location in the lower third of the stomach, tumor size >10 mm, depressed lesion, and ulceration were significantly associated with GC. As the number of risk factors predicting GC increased in both LGD and HGD on pretreatment FB, the rate of upstaging to GC after ER increased.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of LGDs and HGDs on pretreatment FB were diagnosed as GC after ER. Accurate ER procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection should be recommended in cases of LGD and HGD with factors predicting pathologic upstaging to GC.

A nonrandomized, single-arm confirmatory trial of expanded endoscopic submucosal dissection indication for undifferentiated early gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG1009/1010)

BACKGROUND

While endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recognized as a minimally invasive standard treatment for differentiated early gastric cancers (EGCs), it has not been indicated for undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) because of a relatively high risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, patients with surgically resected mucosal (cT1a) UD-EGC ≤ 2 cm in size with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration are reported to be at a very low risk of LNM. This multicenter, single-arm, confirmatory trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for UD-EGC.

METHODS

The key eligibility criteria were endoscopically diagnosed cT1a/N0/M0, single primary lesion, size ≤ 2 cm, no ulceration and histologically proven components of undifferentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy. Based on the histological findings after ESD, additional gastrectomy was indicated if the criteria for curative resection were not satisfied. The subjects of the primary analysis were patients with UD-EGC as the dominant component. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with UD-EGC.

RESULTS

Three hundred 46 patients were enrolled from 49 institutions. The proportion of en bloc resection was 99%. No ESD-related Grade 4 adverse events were noted. Delayed bleeding and intraoperative and delayed perforation occurred in 25 (7.3%), 13 (3.8%), and 6 (1.7%) patients, respectively. Among the 275 patients who were the subjects of the primary analysis, curative resection was achieved in 195 patients (71%), and 5-year OS was 99.3% (95% CI: 97.1-99.8).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD can be a curative and less invasive treatment for UD-EGC for patients meeting the eligibility criteria of this study.

Comparative analysis of differences between preoperative endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological examination for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to compare the differences between preoperative endoscopic biopsy (PEB) and postoperative pathological examination (PPE) for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN).

METHODS

From September 2016 to July 2019, 188 consecutive patients with GIN at Yuyao People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The 188 patients had 218 GIN lesions. All patients underwent PEB and either endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical treatment. PPE was performed on pathological tissues that had been surgically removed.

RESULTS

Among 138 cases of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) diagnosed by PEB, 46 were upgraded to high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 20 were upgraded to early gastric cancer (EGC), and 2 were downgraded to inflammation after PPE. Among 42 cases of HGD, 23 were upgraded to EGC, 2 were downgraded to LGD, and 2 were downgraded to inflammation after PPE. Among 38 cases of EGC, 1 was downgraded to HGD and 2 were downgraded to LGD after PPE. The original diagnosis was maintained after the operation in 120 cases of GIN.

CONCLUSION

Biopsy did not fully reflect the lesions of GIN. Biopsy review should be actively performed, and the lesions should be clarified by endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery.

Complementary and alternative therapies for precancerous lesions of gastric cancer: A protocol for a Bayesian network meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, which seriously affect peoples quality of life and threaten people's health. Precancerous lesions of gastric cancer (PLGC) are a critical stage in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. Early effective intervention is an important means to prevent and control gastric cancer. In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of PLGC by Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We will search PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI and other databases to gather randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of PLGC with complementary and alternative therapies. Two reviewers will screen the literature and extract the data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then assess the quality and bias risk according to Cochrane's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be conducted by Stata16.0 and WinBUGS1.4.3.

RESULTS

This study will compare and rank the efficacy and safety of different complementary and alternative therapies for PLGC.

CONCLUSION

This study can provide reliable evidence for the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies in treatment of PLGC. We expect to provide scientific and rigorous evidence support for clinicians and patients, and then assist them to choose the optimum treatment.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY2020120077.

Gastric cancer screening in low incidence populations: Position statement of AEG, SEED and SEAP

This positioning document, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica, aims to establish recommendations for the screening of gastric cancer (GC) in low incidence populations, such as the Spanish. To establish the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We obtained a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document evaluates screening in the general population, individuals with relatives with GC and subjects with GC precursor lesions (GCPL). The goal of the interventions should be to reduce GC related mortality. We recommend the use of the OLGIM classification and determine the intestinal metaplasia (IM) subtype in the evaluation of GCPL. We do not recommend to establish endoscopic mass screening for GC or Helicobacter pylori. However, the document strongly recommends to treat H.pylori if the infection is detected, and the investigation and treatment in individuals with a family history of GC or with GCPL. Instead, we recommend against the use of serological tests to detect GCPL. Endoscopic screening is suggested only in individuals that meet familial GC criteria. As for individuals with GCPL, endoscopic surveillance is only suggested in extensive IM associated with additional risk factors (incomplete IM and/or a family history of GC), after resection of dysplastic lesions or in patients with dysplasia without visible lesion after a high quality gastroscopy with chromoendoscopy.

Endoscopic acanthosis nigricans appearance: A novel specific marker for diagnosis of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

At present, there is no recognized diagnostic criteria for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). The purpose of this study was to determine whether an "endoscopic acanthosis nigricans appearance (EANA)" could be a useful endoscopic marker for distinguishing LGIN lesions from peripheral non-neoplastic tissues.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 638 cases of suspected superficial lesions with endoscopic images from white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging. According to the pathological results of accurate biopsies, those lesions were divided into three groups: a control group, an LGIN group, and an early gastric cancer (EGC) group.

RESULTS

According to the presence of EANAs, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for differentiating between the LGIN and control groups were 24.8%, 97.3%, 78.3%, and 76.6%, respectively. The sensitivity (84.1%) and negative predictive value (92.4%) were significantly improved by combining EANA with types IV-VI pit pattern. The intervening part and mean gray value of glands, representing microsurface features and microvascular variation, were significantly larger or higher in EANA lesions than in the surrounding non-neoplastic mucosa. LGIN with EANA was more likely to be present in lesions of type 0-IIa. In addition, the prevalence of EANAs in EGC was 16.7%.

CONCLUSION

An EANA could be used as an auxiliary indicator for a diagnosis of LGIN in suspected lesions. It could also play a potential assistive role in the diagnosis of EGC lesions.

Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation masks the underlying presence of low-grade dysplasia on gastric lesions

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been associated with a long-term risk of precancerous gastric conditions (PGC) even after H. pylori eradication.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of High-Resolution White-Light Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging in detecting PGC, before/after H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We studied 85 consecutive patients with H. pylori-related gastritis with/without PGC before and 6 mo after proven H. pylori eradication. Kimura-Takemoto modified and endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia classifications, were applied to assess the endoscopic extension of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. The histological result was considered to be the gold standard. The Sydney System, the Operative-Link on Gastritis-Assessment, and the Operative-Link on Gastric-Intestinal Metaplasia were used for defining histological gastritis, atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, whereas dysplasia was graded according to World Health Organization classification. Serum anti-parietal cell antibody and anti-intrinsic factor were measured when autoimmune atrophic gastritis was suspected.

RESULTS

After H. pylori eradication histological signs of mononuclear/polymorphonuclear cell infiltration and Mucosal Associated Lymphoid Tissue-hyperplasia, disappeared or decreased in 100% and 96.5% of patients respectively, whereas the Operative-Link on Gastritis-Assessment and Operative-Link on Gastric-Intestinal Metaplasia stages did not change. Low-Grade Dysplasia prevalence was similar on random biopsies before and after H. pylori eradication (17.6% vs 10.6%, P = 0.19), but increased in patients with visible lesions (0% vs 22.4%, P < 0.0001). At a multivariate analysis, the probability for detecting dysplasia after resolution of H. pylori-related active inflammation was higher in patients with regression or reduction of Mucosal Associated Lymphoid Tissue hyperplasia, greater alcohol consumption, and anti-parietal cell antibody and/or anti-intrinsic factor positivity [odds ratio (OR) = 3.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-11.49, P = 0.01; OR = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.05-9.12, P = 0.04 and OR = 5.47, 95%CI: 1.33-22.39, P < 0.04, respectively].

CONCLUSION

High-Resolution White-Light Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging allows an accurate diagnosis of Low-Grade Dysplasia on visible lesions after regression of H. pylori-induced chronic gastritis. Patients with an overlap between autoimmune/H. pylori-induced gastritis may require more extensive gastric mapping.

Predictive Model of Nonneoplastic Pathology after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia

Background/Aims

The rate of nonneoplastic pathology (NNP) after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN) has been reported to be 3%–7%. However, to date, the associations of pretreatment characteristics with NNP have not been identified. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for NNP after ER.

Methods

Among 817 patients who underwent ER for GEN, factors associated with NNP were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Weighted points considering the β coefficient were allocated to each variable that was significant in the multivariate analysis. The predictive score was calculated by the total points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for the predictive score.

Results

The rate of NNP was 8.8%. After multivariate analysis, poor demarcation from the background, no ulceration, a flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia were significant factors predictive of NNP. One point each was allocated for no ulcer, flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia. Two points were allocated for poor demarcation from the background. The predictive score ranged from 0 to 5 points. Patients were categorized as being at low risk (0, 1, or 2 points) or high risk (3, 4, or 5 points) for NNP. The AUROC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.88; p<0.01). With a cutoff value of 2.5, the sensitivity and specificity of the score for predicting NNP were 0.72 and 0.84, respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a model to predict NNP after ER. Endoscopic re-biopsy or re-evaluation by pathologists is strongly recommended for the high-risk group.

Additive Effect of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Diagnosing Mixed-Type Early Gastric Cancers

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment biopsy may not correctly diagnose mixed-type early gastric cancers. Despite reports on the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in diagnosing early gastric cancers, no reports exist on differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings between differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancers.

AIM

This study aimed to clarify differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings and investigate the additive effect of combining magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and biopsy findings for pretreatment histological-type diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection as initial treatment between April 2005 and March 2017 participated in this retrospective study. There were 156 differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and 36 undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. We extracted the most significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings of differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions using multivariate analysis and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity between pretreatment biopsy alone and a combination of biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings.

RESULTS

Significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings was fine network pattern in differentiated-type-predominant and corkscrew pattern in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were significantly higher with combined biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings than with pretreatment biopsy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results demonstrated the additive effect of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging with biopsy for diagnosing mixed-type early gastric cancers. This study may be beneficial in routine practice because it indicates a possibility of reducing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal resection because of incorrect diagnosis of histological type.

Indication for endoscopic treatment based on the risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has expanded to undifferentiated type (UD-type) early gastric cancer (EGC). There is debate as to whether the endoscopic resection can be used. This study was conducted to evaluate risk factors for LNM in undifferentiated early gastric cancer, implications for the indication of the ESD so as to providing evidence for proper clinical management for UD-type EGC.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with UD-type EGC who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2017. We evaluated the relationship between the clinicopathological factors and the presence of LNM using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 203 UD-type EGC patients were enrolled, and LNM was positive in 40 cases (19.7%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified three independent risk factors for LNM, the tumor size (≥2.0 cm, P < 0.001), depth of invasion (P < 0.001), and lymphatic vessel involvement (LVI, P < 0.001). LNM was observed in 5.9% patients without the three predictive factors in UD-type EGC, whereas 7.7% and 37.7% of patients with one and two risk factors had LNM, respectively. In contrast, the LNM rate was up to be 66.7% in patients with three factors. Of 41 patients satisfying the expanded indication of ESD, 3 patients (7.3%) showed LNM. LNM was not found in any of 12 patients with small intramucosal lesions (<1.0 cm) without LVI.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM-related risk factors were tumor larger than 2.0 cm, submucosal invasion, and the presence of LVI in UD-type EGC. ESD alone may be sufficient treatment for the intramucosal UD-type EGC that is smaller than 1.0 cm in size. When endoscopically resected specimens show unexpectedly larger tumor size, unexpected submucosal and LVI than that determined at pre-ESD endoscopic diagnosis, an additional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy should be considered.

Forceps Biopsies Are Not Reliable in the Workup of Large Colorectal Lesions Referred for Endoscopic Resection: Should They Be Abandoned?

BACKGROUND

Biopsies are routinely obtained in the workup of large colorectal polyps before endoscopic resection.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine how reliable biopsies are in terms of reflecting the true histopathology of large colorectal polyps, in the clinical routine.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Data from patients undergoing polypectomy of large colorectal polyps at the endoscopy unit, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, between January 2014 and December 2016 were scrutinized.

PATIENTS

A total of 485 colorectal lesions were biopsied within 1 year before complete endoscopic removal. Biopsy-obtained specimens were compared with completely resected specimens in terms of concordance and discordance and if the final result was upgraded or downgraded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the concordance between biopsy-obtained specimens and completely resected specimens.

RESULTS

Median lesion size was 3 cm (range 1-11). In 189 cases (39%), biopsies did not provide a correct dysplastic grade compared with final pathology after complete resection. One hundred forty-three cases (29%) and 46 cases (9%) were upgraded and downgraded. The percentage of cases with discordant biopsy results was 40% in cases with 1 biopsy taken and 38% in cases where multiple biopsies had been sampled. Time from biopsy to complete resection did not influence the erroneous outcome of biopsies. Notably, the percentage of discordant biopsy results was 37% and 35% in lesions measuring 1 to 2 cm and 2 to 4 cm. However, this percentage increased to 48% in colorectal lesions larger than 4 cm.

LIMITATIONS

This study was designed to reflect the clinical routine, the number of biopsies obtained and forceps technique were hence not standardized, which constitutes a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that cancer-negative forceps biopsies of large colorectal polyps, referred for endoscopic resection, are not reliable. Considering that endoscopic resection of lesions containing superficial cancer is plausible, the clinical value of forceps biopsies in lesions suitable for endoscopic resection is questionable. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A984. LAS BIOPSIAS CON FÓRCEPS NO SON CONFIABLES EN EL ESTUDIO DE LAS LESIONES COLORRECTALES GRANDES REFERIDAS PARA RESECCIÓN ENDOSCÓPICA: ¿DEBERÍAN ABANDONARSE?: Las biopsias se obtienen de forma rutinaria en el estudio de pólipos colorrectales grandes previo a resección endoscópica.

OBJETIVO

Analizar que tan confiables son las biopsias en cuanto a reflejar la verdadera histopatología de los pólipos colorrectales grandes, en la rutina clínica. DISEÑO:: Este es un estudio retrospectivo.

AJUSTES

Los datos de pacientes sometidos a polipectomía de pólipos colorrectales grandes en la unidad de endoscopia, en Skåne University Hospital Malmö, entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2016 fueron examinados.

PACIENTES

Un total de 485 lesiones colorrectales se biopsiaron dentro de un año antes de la resección endoscópica completa. Las muestras obtenidas mediante biopsia se compararon con las muestras completas resecadas en términos de concordancia y discordancia, y si el resultado final ascendió o disminuyó de categoría.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO

Concordancia entre muestras obtenidas mediante biopsia y muestras completamente resecadas.

RESULTADOS

La mediana de tamaño de lesiones fue de 3 cm (rango 1-11). En 189 casos (39%) las biopsias no proporcionaron un grado de displasia correcto en comparación con la patología final después de la resección completa. 143 casos (29%) y 46 casos (9%) ascendieron y descendieron de categoría, respectivamente. El porcentaje de casos con resultados de biopsia discordantes fue del 40% en los casos con una sola biopsia tomada y del 38% en los casos en los que se tomaron múltiples biopsias. El tiempo desde la biopsia hasta la resección completa no influyó en el resultado erróneo de las biopsias. Notablemente, el porcentaje de resultados de biopsia discordantes fue de 37% y 35% en lesiones que midieron 1-2 cm y 2-4 cm, respectivamente. Sin embargo, este porcentaje aumentó a 48% en lesiones colorrectales mayores de 4 cm.

LIMITACIONES

Este estudio se diseñó para reflejar la rutina clínica, el número de biopsias obtenidas y la técnica de fórceps no fueron estandarizadas, lo que constituye una limitación.

CONCLUSIONES

Este estudio demuestra que las biopsias con fórceps negativas a cáncer, de pólipos colorrectales grandes referidas para resección endoscópica, no son confiables. Teniendo en cuenta que la resección endoscópica de lesiones que contienen cáncer superficial es posible, el valor clínico de las biopsias con fórceps en lesiones aptas para la resección endoscópica es cuestionable. Vea el Resumen en video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A984.

Histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic forceps biopsy results that reflect the final pathologic results of an entire lesion are essential for making accurate diagnoses and appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms (SESNs). This study investigated the histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens to elucidate the factors contributing to such discrepancies.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved 77 patients (84 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resections for SESNs, between January 2005 and August 2017, at the Pusan National University Hospital. The SESNs were classified as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (LGINs), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGINs), or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Following slide reviews, the histopathologic concordance between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was assessed, in each case.

RESULTS

The histopathologic discrepancy rate between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was 34.5% (29/84 lesions). Among the 29 diagnostically discordant lesions, upgrades and downgrades of the histopathologic diagnoses occurred for 27 and 2 lesions, respectively. The predominant discrepancies results in lesion upgrades from HGIN to SCC (n = 21) and from LGIN to SCC (n = 5). The two downgraded cases included one from SCC to HGIN and one from HGIN to LGIN. Multivariate analyses identified two factors that were significantly associated with the histopathologic discrepancies: upper esophageal location (odds ratio, 7.743; 95% confidence interval, 1.031-58.174; P = 0.047) and tumor area per biopsy ≥ 158.6 mm² /biopsy (odds ratio, 5.933; 95% confidence interval, 1.051-44.483; P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Histopathologic discrepancies were observed between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in patients with SESNs. Tumor location and tumor area/biopsy were both significantly associated with the discrepancies.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUNDS/AIM

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy and compared the clinical outcomes by tumor location and endoscopic treatment modality.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy between January 1996 and August 2013. The treatments included endoscopic resection or argon plasma coagulation.

RESULTS

Herein, 107 patients (median age, 65.1 years; 92 men) encompassing 117 cases of gastric neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy were endoscopically treated. Forty of these lesions were located at anastomotic sites; they were treated with endoscopic resection in 29 cases (72.5%) and argon plasma coagulation in 11 cases (27.5%). For 77 lesions located on the non-anastomotic site, endoscopic resection was performed in 68 cases (88.4%) and argon plasma coagulation was performed in nine cases (11.7%; p = 0.031). The mean endoscopic resection duration was significantly longer in the anastomotic site group than in the non-anastomotic site group (43.6 vs. 26.3 min, p = 0.018). Recurrence was observed in five (12.8%) patients in the former and in one (1.3%) in the latter (p = 0.015); all the patients were successfully retreated with endoscopic resection or APC.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in a remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy is effective and safe. However, closely monitoring for recurrence should be conducted, particularly when the tumor is located at the anastomotic site.

A Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer with Lymphoid Stroma

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate immediate outcomes and clinical courses of patients with early gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (GCLS) who underwent endoscopic resection.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients (mean age, 56.9 years; 90.0% male) who underwent endoscopic resection and were pathologically diagnosed with GCLS confined to the mucosa or to the submucosa between March 1998 and December 2017.

Results

Forty GCLS lesions in 40 patients were treated using endoscopic resection. Only 4 (10%) patients received diagnosis of GCLS before endoscopic resection. Fourteen (35.0%) lesions were intramucosal cancers and 26 (65.0%) exhibited submucosal invasion. En bloc resection (97.5%) was achieved for all lesions except one, with no significant complications. The complete resection rate was 85.0% (34 of 40 lesions). After endoscopic resection, 17 patients were referred for surgery and underwent gastrectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection because of deep submucosal invasion (n=16) and misclassification as undifferentiated cancer (n=1). No LN metastasis was determined in the specimens obtained during surgery. During a mean follow-up period of 49.7 months for 23 patients without surgical treatment, no regional LN enlargements, distant metastases, or gastric cancer-related deaths were found, although 1 metachronous lesion (undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, follow-up duration: 7 months) was observed.

Conclusions

In patients with early GCLS, endoscopic resection is technically feasible and has favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, endoscopic resection might represent an alternative treatment modality in patients with early GCLS with a low likelihood of LN metastasis.

Risk factors associated with histological upgrade of gastric low-grade dysplasia on pretreatment biopsy

OBJECTIVES

Histological discrepancies between biopsy and resection specimens are common. In this study, we aimed to analyze the risk factors predicting histological upgrade or downgrade of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade dysplasia (LGD).

METHODS

The medical records of patients with 104 biopsy-diagnosed gastric LGD from January 2011 to December 2017 were collected. The association of endoscopic characteristics with histological discrepancies between the biopsy and resection specimens was analyzed. The risk factors for histological upgrade were studied using the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 104 lesions, 88 were removed by endoscopic resection and 16 were monitored. The upgrade and downgrade rates of the pathological diagnosis were 48.9% and 12.5%, respectively. Lesion size >20 mm, surface redness and positive results in magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) were risk factors for histological upgrade. Compared with the negative ME-NBI group, the positive ME-NBI group had a higher upgrade rate (56.8% vs 7.1%) but a lower downgrade rate (2.7% vs 64.3%). In addition, 11 of the 16 the gastric LGD with negative ME-NBI findings were monitored, and all 11 lesions regressed to gastritis during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection should be recommended in cases of LGD showing surface redness, with a lesion size of >20 mm or positive ME-NBI result, whereas regular follow-up may be an option for LGD with negative ME-NBI result.

Gastric Cancer Caused by Adenoma: Predictive Factors Associated with Lesions Other Than the Expanded Indications

Background/Aims

We aimed to investigate whether the current indications for curative endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric cancer (GC) can be applied to GC caused by adenoma. Additionally, we attempted to identify factors predictive of lesions subsequently found in addition to the expanded indications for ER.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 342 patients diagnosed with GC caused by adenoma who underwent ER at a single tertiary center between February 2011 and December 2014. The gross whole tumor size was measured using the endoscopically resected specimen. The microscopic whole tumor size was measured using mapping paper. The estimated cancer size was calculated using the microscopic whole tumor size and the square root of the carcinoma component.

Results

A gross whole tumor size ≥3 cm, carcinoma component ≥35%, and gross ulceration were predictive of lesions other than the expanded indications for ER. The overall rate of lymph node metastasis was 0.3% (1/327), which only occurred in one patient with a lesion other than the expanded indications (4.5%, 1/22).

Conclusions

The current indications for curative ER in GC can be applied to GC caused by adenoma. In cases suspected of having lesions other than the expanded indications, patients should be cautiously selected for ER to reduce the risk of an inappropriate procedure.

Clinical predictors of histologic type of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric cancer is classified into differentiated and undifferentiated types according to the degree of glandular differentiation. Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC) carries a higher risk of lymph-node metastasis than differentiated type, and therefore the indication criteria for endoscopic resection differ. This study aimed to clarify the ability of clinical predictors to distinguish between differentiated-type and undifferentiated-type EGCs.

METHODS

This was a post hoc study of a multicenter prospective trial carried out in 5 Japanese hospitals, including 343 patients with cT1 EGC of ≥10 mm. According to the protocol, age, sex, and endoscopic findings of cancer (diameter, location, macroscopic type, and invasion depth) were evaluated, and the final diagnosis was confirmed from resected specimens. We evaluated the associations between these clinical factors and the histologic type of cancer and calculated the ability of the factors to diagnose differentiated-type EGC. The diagnostic ability of forceps biopsy was also calculated as a reference.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified older age (≥72 years), male sex, larger tumor size (>30 mm), elevated type, and shallower invasion depth (cT1a) as independent significant predictors for differentiated-type EGC, with elevated type showing the highest positive likelihood ratio. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of elevated type for differentiated-type EGC were 24%, 99%, 38%, 15.7, and 0.77, respectively, compared with 96%, 86%, 95%, 7.0, and 0.04 for forceps biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic elevated type is a significant predictor for differentiated-type EGC and may exclude undifferentiated-type EGC without the need for forceps biopsy.

[Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Adenoma]

Gastric adenoma (dysplasia) is a precancerous lesion. Therefore, managements of gastric adenomas are important for preventing the development of gastric cancers and for detecting gastric cancers at earlier stages. The Vienna classification divides gastric adenomas into two categories: high-grade dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia. Generally, endoscopic resection is performed for adenoma with high-grade dysplasia due to the coexistence of carcinoma and the potential of progression to carcinomas. However, the treatments of adenoma with low-grade dysplasia remain controversial. Currently two treatment strategies for the low-grade type have been suggested; First is the 'wait and see' strategy; Second is endoscopic treatment (e.g., endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, or argon plasma coagulation). In this review, we discuss the current optimal strategies for endoscopic management of gastric adenoma.

Negative pathology after endoscopic resection of gastric epithelial neoplasms: importance of pit dysplasia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic resection (ER) is a well-established treatment modality for gastric epithelial neoplasm. However, there is a discrepancy between forceps biopsy and ER specimen pathology, including a negative pathologic diagnosis (NPD) after ER. It has been suggested that pit dysplasia (PD) is a subtype of gastric dysplasia, and the aim of this study was to assess the significance of PD in cases with NPD after ER for early gastric neoplasms.

METHODS

After ER, 29 NPD lesions that had an associated pretreatment forceps biopsy specimen, were correctly targeted during ER, and had no cautery artifact on the resected specimen were included in this study.

RESULTS

Sixteen lesions showed PD and 13 had no neoplastic pathology. The initial pretreatment forceps biopsy diagnoses of 29 NPD lesions were low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in 17 lesions, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in seven lesions, and adenocarcinoma in five lesions, which after review were revised to PD in 19 lesions, LGD in four lesions, adenocarcinoma in two lesions, and no neoplastic pathology in four lesions. Overall, nine lesions (31%) were small enough to be removed by forceps biopsy, four NPD lesions (14%) were initially misinterpreted as neoplastic lesions, and 16 PD lesions (55%) were misinterpreted as NPD lesions on ER slides.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the lesions initially diagnosed as LGD or HGD were subsequently classified as PD. Therefore, including PD as a subtype of gastric dysplasia could reduce the diagnostic discrepancy between initial forceps biopsy and ER specimens.

Role of targeted biopsy under magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging may be not necessary: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Targeted biopsy under the guidance of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) has higher accuracy than endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) in the differential diagnosis of cancerous lesions from noncancerous lesions. The aims of this study were to validate diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy under the guidance of ME-NBI (MNTB) and further evaluate whether it is necessary to perform MNTB when combined with ME-NBI.

METHODS

This study prospectively analyzed 211 gastric lesions of suspected cancerous tissues. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EFB, ME-NBI, MNTB, EFB plus ME-NBI, and MNTB plus ME-NBI for the diagnosis of cancerous lesions were determined, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of EFB and MNTB, EFB plus ME-NBI, and MNTB plus ME-NBI were also compared, respectively.

RESULTS

The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were 68.2% (61.4-74.4%), 62.3% (54.1-69.9%), 84.2% (71.6-92.1%) for EFB, 75.4% (68.9-80.9%), 72.7% (64.9-79.4%), 82.5% (69.6-90.8%) for MNTB, 76.8% (70.4-82.2%), 73.4% (65.5-80.0%), 86.0% (73.7-93.3%) for ME-NBI, 82.0% (76.0-86.8%), 85.7% (79.0-90.6%), 71.9% (58.3-82.6%) for EFB plus ME-NBI, 84.8% (79.1-89.3%), 89.6% (83.4-93.8%), and 71.9% (58.3-82.6%) for MNTB plus ME-NBI, respectively. The sensitivity of MNTB was significantly higher than that of EFB (P=0.048). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity (P=0.307), specificity (P=1.000), and accuracy (P=0.337) between EFB plus ME-NBI and MNTB plus ME-NBI.

CONCLUSION

Although MNTB has a higher diagnostic efficacy than EFB in the diagnosis of cancerous lesions, it may be not necessary to perform MNTB when combined with ME-NBI.

Practical Points in Gastric Pathology

CONTEXT

-The diagnosis of gastric epithelial lesions is difficult in clinical practice, even with the recent developments and advances in endoscopic modalities, owing to the diverse morphologic features of the lesions, lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, and the high intraobserver and interobserver variabilities in the nonneoplastic (regenerative)-neoplastic spectrum.

OBJECTIVE

-To provide an overview of the current concepts and unresolved issues surrounding the diagnosis of diseases in the nonneoplastic-neoplastic spectrum, and to discuss some noteworthy properties and histologic features of gastric epithelial lesions.

DATA SOURCES

-A comprehensive assessment of the medical literature on gastric epithelial lesions was performed; we also interjected our own experiences into the discussion. Sources included original studies, review articles, and textbooks related to the field.

CONCLUSIONS

-Our literature review revealed that clear cell changes and micropapillary carcinoma components in gastric carcinomas are associated with poor clinical outcomes and should hence be included in pathologic reports. Moreover, we suggest a stepwise biopsy-endoscopic resection modality for the diagnosis of borderline neoplasia-nonneoplasia cases.

Atrophic and Metaplastic Progression in the Background Mucosa of Patients with Gastric Adenoma

BACKGROUND

In patients with adenoma, assessing premalignant changes in the surrounding mucosa is important for surveillance. This study evaluated atrophic and metaplastic progression in the background mucosa of adenoma or early gastric cancer (EGC) cases.

METHODS

Among 146 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for intestinal-type gastric neoplasia, the adenoma group included 56 patients with low-grade dysplasia and the ECG group included 90 patients with high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. For histology, 3 paired biopsies were obtained from the antrum, corpus lesser curvature (CLC), and corpus greater curvature (CGC). Serological atrophy was determined based on pepsinogen A (PGA), progastricsin (PGC), gastrin-17, and total ghrelin levels. Topographic progression of atrophy and/or metaplasia was staged using the operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) and operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) systems.

RESULTS

Rates of moderate-to-marked histological atrophy/metaplasia in patients with adenoma were 52.7%/78.2% at the antrum (vs. 58.8%/76.4% in EGC group), 63.5%/75.0% at the CLC (vs. 60.2%/69.7% in EGC group), and 10.9%/17.9% at the CGC (vs. 5.6%/7.8% in EGC group). Serological atrophy indicated by PGA and PGC occurred in 23.2% and 15.6% of cases in the adenoma and ECG groups, respectively (p = 0.25). Mean serum gastrin-17 concentrations of the adenoma group and EGC group were 10.4 and 9.0 pmol/L, respectively (p = 0.54). Mean serum total ghrelin levels were 216.6 and 209.5 pg/mL, respectively (p = 0.71). Additionally, between group rates of stage III-IV OLGA and OLGIM were similar (25.9% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.90; 41.8% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrophic and metaplastic progression is extensive and severe in gastric adenoma patients. A surveillance strategy for metachronous tumors should be applied similarly for patients with adenoma or EGC.

Analysis of Surgical Pathology Data in the HIRA Database: Emphasis on Current Status and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Specimens

Background:

In Korea, medical institutions make claims for insurance reimbursement to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Thus, HIRA databases reflect the general medical services that are provided in Korea. We conducted two pathology-related studies using a HIRA national patient sample (NPS) data (selection probability, 0.03). First, we evaluated the current status of general pathologic examination in Korea. Second, we evaluated pathologic issues associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods:

The sample data used in this study was HIRA-NPS-2013-0094.

Results:

In the NPS dataset, 163,372 pathologic examinations were performed in 103,528 patients during the year 2013. Considering sampling weight (33.3), it is estimated that 5,440,288 (163,372 × 33.3) pathologic examinations were performed. Internal medicine and general surgery were the most common departments requesting pathologic examinations. The region performing pathologic examinations were different according to type of medical institution. In total, 490 patients underwent ESD, and 43.4% (213/490) underwent ESD due to gastric carcinoma. The results of the ESD led to a change in disease code for 10.5% (29/277) of non-gastric carcinoma patients. In addition, 21 patients (4.3%) underwent surgery following the ESD. The average period between ESD and surgery was 44 days.

Conclusions:

HIRA sample data provide the nation-wide landscape of specific procedure. However, in order to reduce the statistical error, further studies using entire HIRA data are needed.

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) is widely used in gastroscopy, especially in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of white light imaging (WLI) and that of ME-NBI for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies which met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the diagnostic efficacy of WLI and ME-NBI in early gastric cancer. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, and included 1724 patients and 2153 lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer using WLI were 0.48 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.57; I (2) = 78.6 %], 0.67 (95 % CI 0.62-0.71; I (2) = 81.9 %), and 0.62, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC using ME-NBI were 0.83 (95 % CI 0.79-0.87; I (2) = 79.8 %), 0.96 (95 % CI 0.95-0.97; I (2) = 89.3 %), and 0.96, respectively. The studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity. Further sensitivity analysis was mainly performed for the studies of small lesions (mean size 10 mm or less) and the studies with a the score of 12 points or greater in the literature quality assessment, and the AUCs for ME-NBI for diagnosis of early gastric cancer were between 0.93 and 0.98, which suggested that the diagnostic value was still high and stable.

CONCLUSION

Compared with WLI, ME-NBI can effectively diagnose early gastric cancer.

Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resections for the management of small gastric adenomas with low-grade dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

Gastric adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) can progress to gastric cancer; however, the optimal therapeutic modality for LGD has not been established. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety of and local recurrence following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for LGD. Specifically, we compared EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) and EMR using a dual-channel endoscope (EMR-D) for the treatment of LGD ≤2 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 158 lesions from 147 patients with LGD treated by EMR were retrospectively analyzed. The en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, procedure time, complication rate and local recurrence rate were compared between EMR-P and EMR-D.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection and complete resection rates of EMR were 91.1% and 90.5%, respectively. The bleeding and perforation rates were 1.3% and 1.3%, respectively. The local recurrence rate following EMR was 2.2%. The en bloc resection and complete resection rates did not differ between EMR-P and EMR-D (88.2% vs. 92.5%, p = not significant (NS); and 90.2% vs. 90.7%, p = NS, respectively). The procedure time was significantly longer for EMR-P compared with EMR-D (16 (5-141) vs. 7 (2-48) min, p < 0.001), and the complication rate was significantly higher for EMR-P (7.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.010). Local recurrence was not found in EMR-P, whereas the recurrence rate was 3.2% in EMR-D.

CONCLUSION

EMR is an effective method for the treatment of LGD ≤2 cm. Compared with EMR-P, EMR-D appears to be the more effective, technically simple and safer method.

Diagnosis and management of gastric dysplasia

Gastric dysplasia is a neoplastic lesion and a precursor of gastric cancer. The Padova, Vienna, and World Health Organization classifications were developed to overcome the discrepancies between Western and Japanese pathologic diagnoses and to provide a universally accepted classification of gastric epithelial neoplasia. At present, the natural history of gastric dysplasia is unclear. Much evidence suggests that patients with high-grade dysplasia are at high risk of progression to carcinoma or synchronous carcinoma. Therefore, endoscopic resection is required. Although patients with low-grade dysplasia have been reported to be at low risk of progression to carcinoma, due to the marked histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy and endoscopic specimens, endoscopic resection for this lesion is recommended, particularly in the presence of other risk factors (large size; depressed gross type; surface erythema, unevenness, ulcer, or erosion; and tubulovillous or villous histology). Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with dysplasia after endoscopic resection appear to reduce the incidence of metachronous lesions.

Diagnostic group classifications of gastric neoplasms by endoscopic resection criteria before and after treatment: real-world experience

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

There are often discrepancies between the pretreatment evaluation of gastric neoplasms by endoscopy with biopsy and the final diagnosis of resected specimen in terms of pathology and depth of invasion. We evaluated the spectrum of discrepancies between pretreatment and posttreatment diagnosis which may deliver significant differences on clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2041 patients with gastric dysplasia or cancer who underwent curative endoscopic resections or surgeries in 2012 were enrolled. Patients were classified into five different diagnostic groups: low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), absolute indication early gastric cancer (AI-EGC), beyond absolute indication early gastric cancer (BAI-EGC), and advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The choice of initial treatment and final pathologic diagnosis was analyzed.

RESULTS

The study patients belonged to the following pretreatment diagnostic groups: LGDs in 162, HGDs in 164, AI-EGCs in 396, BAI-EGCs in 824, and AGCs in 495 cases. Posttreatment diagnostic groups were LGDs in 140, HGDs in 121, AI-EGCs in 322, BAI-EGCs in 947, AGCs in 505, and no residual tumor in 6 cases. In general, 6.9 % (141/2041) of cases were downgraded and 15.9 % (324/2041) were upgraded. Thirty-four percent of pretreatment HGDs (56/164) were changed to cancers after endoscopic resection. Thirty-three percent of pretreatment AI-EGCs (131/396) were regrouped as posttreatment BAI-EGCs. The additional surgery rate in each pretreatment group was 0.6 % in LGD, 4.3 % in HGD, 15.7 % in AI-EGC, 23.6 % in BAI-EGC among the patients with initial endoscopic resection (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-three percent of gastric neoplasms changed in their final diagnostic group after endoscopic resection or surgery. This discrepancy should be considered when the initial treatment strategy is being selected.

Is screening and surveillance for early detection of gastric cancer needed in Korean Americans?

The incidence rate of gastric cancer in Korean Americans is over five times higher than that in non-Hispanic whites, and is similar to the incidence of colorectal cancer in the overall United States population. In Korea, the National Cancer Screening Program recommends endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series for people aged 40 years and older every 2 years. However, the benefit of gastric cancer screening in Korean Americans has not been evaluated. Based on epidemiologic studies, Korean Americans appear to have more similar gastric cancer risk factors to Koreans as opposed to Americans of European descent, though the risk of gastric cancer appears to decrease for subsequent generations. Therefore, in accordance with recent recommendations regarding screening for gastric cancer in Korea, endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Korean Americans should be considered, especially in those with known atrophic gastritis/intestinal metaplasia or a family history of gastric cancer. In the future, additional studies will needed to assess whether a screening program for gastric cancer in Korean Americans will result in a survival benefit.

Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients

Differences in pathologic diagnosis between endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) and early gastric carcinoma (EGC) in Chinese patients remain unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors for under-diagnosed pathology in initial EFB, compared to final ESD. We reviewed endoscopic and histopathologic findings for tumor location, size, macroscopic pattern, nodularity, erythema, erosion, GIN (low and high grade), and EGC diagnosed with the WHO criteria. Differences in those features between EFB and ESD were compared and risk factors for under-diagnosis by EFB were analyzed. Although concordant in most (74.9 %) cases between EFBs and ESDs, pathological diagnoses in 57 (25.1 %) cases were upgraded in ESDs. Compared to the concordant group, the lesion size ≥2 cm, and depressed and excavated patterns were significantly more frequent in the upgraded group. Further multivariate regression analysis demonstrated the depressed pattern and lesion size ≥2 cm as independent risk factors for upgraded pathology with the odds ratio of 5.778 (95 % confidence interval 2.893-11.542) and 2.535 (95 % confidence interval 1.257-5.111), respectively. Lesion size ≥2.0 cm and the depressed pattern at initial EFB were independent risk factors for pathologic upgrade to advanced diseases in ESD. Therefore, these endoscopic characteristics should be considered together with the initial EFB diagnosis to guide the optimal clinical management of patients with GIN and EGC.