1
|
Stephens IJB, Byrnes KG, Burke JP. Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical approaches and clinical outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:153. [PMID: 38705912 PMCID: PMC11070401 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03343-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transanal minimally invasive surgery has theoretical advantages for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. We performed a systematic review assessing technical approaches to transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes to transabdominal (abd-IPAA) approaches. METHODS Three databases were searched for articles investigating Ta-IPAA outcomes. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, post operative morbidity, and length of stay (LoS). Staging, plane of dissection, anastomosis, extraction site, operative time, and functional outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS Searches identified 13 studies with 404 unique Ta-IPAA and 563 abd-IPAA patients. Anastomotic leak rates were 6.3% and 8.4% (RD 0, 95% CI -0.066 to 0.065, p = 0.989) and conversion rates 2.5% and 12.5% (RD -0.106, 95% CI -0.155 to -0.057, p = 0.104) for Ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA. Average LoS was one day shorter (MD -1, 95% CI -1.876 to 0.302, p = 0.007). A three-stage approach was most common (47.6%), operative time was 261(± 60) mins, and total mesorectal excision and close rectal dissection were equally used (49.5% vs 50.5%). Functional outcomes were similar. Lack of randomised control trials, case-matched series, and significant study heterogeneity limited analysis, resulting in low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Analysis demonstrated the feasibility and safety of Ta-IPAA with reduced LoS, trend towards less conversions, and comparable anastomotic leak rates and post operative morbidity. Though results are encouraging, they need to be interpreted with heterogeneity and selection bias in mind. Robust randomised clinical trials are warranted to adequately compare ta-IPAA to transabdominal approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J B Stephens
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Kevin G Byrnes
- Havering and Redbridge University Trust, Greater London, UK
| | - John P Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang S, Lin Y, Zhong W, Xu W, Huang Z, Cai S, Chen W, Zhang B. Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14493. [PMID: 37989718 PMCID: PMC10898402 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To prevent anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, a protective ileostomy is often used. However, the necessity of performing ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the benefit of ileostomy on wound infection after laparoscopic rectal cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were used to retrieve all related documents up to September 2023. Completion of the trial literature was submitted once the eligibility and exclusion criteria were met and the literature quality assessment was evaluated. This study compared the post-operative post-operative complications of an ileostomy with that of non-ileostomy in a laparoscope. We used Reman 5.3 to analyse meta-data. Controlled studies were evaluated with ROBINS-I. The meta-analyses included 525 studies, and 5 publications were chosen to statistically analyse the data according to the classification criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative wound infections among ostomate and nonostomate (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66, 4.84; p = 0.25). In 5 trials, the incidence of anastomotic leak was increased after surgery in nonostomate patients (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.0009). Two studies reported no significant difference in the length of operation time when nonstomal compared to stomal operations in patients with rectal cancer (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, -2.99, 4.74; p = 0.66). No significant difference was found in the rate of wound infection and operation time after operation among the two groups, but the incidence of anastomosis leak increased after operation. Protective ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer was effective in reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients, and we found no additional risk of infection. We cautiously conclude that protective ileostomy is active and necessary for patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage after surgery, which needs to be further confirmed by high-quality studies with larger samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Yang
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wenjin Zhong
- Department of Clinical LaboratoryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wenji Xu
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Zhongxin Huang
- Department of PathologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Suqin Cai
- Department of PathologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Baogen Zhang
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kryzauskas M, Bausys A, Dulskas A, Imbrasaite U, Danys D, Jotautas V, Stratilatovas E, Strupas K, Poskus E, Poskus T. Comprehensive testing of colorectal anastomosis: results of prospective observational cohort study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6194-6204. [PMID: 35146557 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09093-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most threatening complications in colorectal surgery. Intraoperative testing of anastomosis may reduce the postoperative anastomotic leakage rates. This study aimed to investigate a novel comprehensive intraoperative colorectal anastomosis testing technique to detect the failure of the anastomosis construction and to reduce the risk of postoperative leak. METHODS This multi-centre prospective cohort pilot study included 60 patients who underwent colorectal resection with an anastomosis at or below 15 cm from the anal verge. Comprehensive trimodal testing consisted of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography, tension testing, air-leak, and methylene blue leak tests to evaluate the perfusion, tension, and mechanical integrity of the anastomosis. RESULTS Ten (16.7%) patients developed an anastomotic leakage. Trimodal test was positive in 16 (26.6%) patients and the operative plan was changed for all of them. Diverting ileostomy was performed in 14 (87.5%) patients. However, two (12.5%) patients still developed clinically significant anastomotic leakage (Grade B). Forty-four (73.4%) patients had a negative trimodal test, preventive ileostomy was performed in 19 (43.2%), and five (11.4%) patients had clinically significant anastomotic leakage (Grade B and C). CONCLUSION Trimodal testing identifies anastomoses with initial technical failure where reinforcement of anastomosis or diversion can lead to an acceptable rate of anastomotic leakage. Identification of well-performed anastomosis could allow a reduction of ileostomy rate by two-fold. However, anastomotic leakage rate remains high in technically well-performed anastomoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Kryzauskas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania.
| | - Augustinas Bausys
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Donatas Danys
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Valdemaras Jotautas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Kestutis Strupas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Eligijus Poskus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Tomas Poskus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Str., 03101, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mu Y, Zhao L, He H, Zhao H, Li J. The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:318. [PMID: 34732226 PMCID: PMC8567543 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02432-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Protective ileostomy is always applied to avoid clinically significant anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications for patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether it is necessary to perform the ileostomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the efficacy of ileostomy on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were applied for systematic search of all relevant literature, updated to May 07, 2021. Studies compared patients with and without ileostomy for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. We applied Review Manager software to perform this meta-analysis. The quality of the non-randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and the randomized studies were assessed using the Jadad scale. Results We collected a total of 1203 references, and seven studies were included using the research methods. The clinically significant anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in ileostomy group (27/567, 4.76%) than that in non-ileostomy group (54/525, 10.29%) (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.73, P for overall effect = 0.0009, P for heterogeneity = 0.18, I2 = 32%). However, the postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, wound infection, and operation time showed no significant difference between the ileostomy and non-ileostomy groups. Conclusion The results demonstrated that protective ileostomy could decrease the clinically significant anastomotic leakage rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, ileostomy has no effect on postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, wound infection, and operation time. The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02432-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Mu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China
| | - Linxian Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China
| | - Hongyu He
- Operating Theater and Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China
| | - Huimin Zhao
- Operating Theater and Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China
| | - Jiannan Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shukla P, Somashekar U, Thakur DS, Kothari R, Sharma D. Feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations: A prospective observational study. Trop Doct 2021; 51:497-500. [PMID: 34121512 DOI: 10.1177/00494755211007002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Loop ileostomy is commonly performed for typhoid ileal perforations as temporary faecal diversion. This is associated with several stoma-related complications and also requires further surgery for its closure. Thus, we were prompted to conduct a prospective observational study on the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations. After dealing with the perforation, a ghost ileostomy was performed in 10 selected patients with favourable circumstances; otherwise, a conventional loop ileostomy was performed in 19 patients. The two groups were comparable (p > 0.05) for morbidity and mortality except for stoma-related complications, seen only in the loop ileostomy group. Body weight was better preserved in the ghost ileostomy group. One patient in the ghost ileostomy group required conversion to loop ileostomy owing to signs of intra-peritoneal suture leak, without any detriment to outcome. Our study shows safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in selected patients with typhoid ileal perforations, thus avoiding loop ileostomy in one-third of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhat Shukla
- Resident, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
| | - Uday Somashekar
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
| | - Dileep S Thakur
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
| | - Reena Kothari
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
| | - Dhananjaya Sharma
- Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zenger S, Gurbuz B, Can U, Balik E, Yalti T, Bugra D. Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:339-347. [PMID: 33537875 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare ghost ileostomy (GI) and defunctioning ileostomy (DI) in patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer in terms of postoperative morbidity, rehospitalization rates, and total costs. METHODS Patients with an anastomosis level between 5 and 10 cm from the anal verge after LAR were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, rehospitalization rates, and total costs were compared. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were enrolled as follows: 42 patients in the GI group and 81 patients in the DI group. Anastomotic leakage (AL) was identified in three patients who underwent GI, and in all of them, GI was easily converted to DI. There were 96.3% of the patients with DI rehospitalized at least one time because of surgery-related and/or stoma-related complications or stoma closure. When we did not take into account the patients who were rehospitalized for stoma closure, the rates of rehospitalization were 4.7% and 22.2% in the GI and DI groups, respectively (P= 0.01). The mean total costs calculated by removing additional surgical procedures and adding all of the rehospitalization costs were 25,767 USD and 41,875 USD in the GI and DI groups, respectively (P= 0.0001). CONCLUSION GI may be a safe and cost-effective method in patients who underwent LAR with low or medium risk factors for AL. It is possible to avoid unnecessary ileostomy and reduce unwanted outcomes due to it, such as postoperative complications, rehospitalizations, and increased total costs by performing GI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serkan Zenger
- Department of General Surgery, VKF American Hospital, Guzelbahce Street, No:20, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Bulent Gurbuz
- Department of General Surgery, VKF American Hospital, Guzelbahce Street, No:20, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ugur Can
- Department of General Surgery, VKF American Hospital, Guzelbahce Street, No:20, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emre Balik
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tunc Yalti
- Department of General Surgery, VKF American Hospital, Guzelbahce Street, No:20, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dursun Bugra
- Department of General Surgery, VKF American Hospital, Guzelbahce Street, No:20, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zenger S, Gurbuz B, Can U, Bilgic C, Sobutay E, Balik E, Yalti T, Bugra D. Is Ghost Ileostomy an Effective Method in Various Indications for Colorectal Surgery? Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02334-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
8
|
Xia ZX, Cong JC, Zhang H. Rectoseminal vesicle fistula after radical surgery for rectal cancer: Four case reports and a literature review. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:5645-5656. [PMID: 33344556 PMCID: PMC7716322 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rectoseminal vesicle fistula (RSVF) is a rare complication after anterior or low anterior proctectomy for rectal cancer mainly due to anastomotic leakage (AL). Limited literature documenting this rare complication is available. We report four such cases and review the literature to investigate the etiology, clinical manifestations, and the diagnostic and treatment methods of RSVF in order to provide greater insight into this disorder.
CASE SUMMARY Four cases of RSVF were presented and summarized, and a further 12 cases selected from the literature were discussed. The main clinical symptoms in these patients were pneumaturia, fever, scrotal swelling and pain, anal pain, orchitis, diarrhea, dysuria, epididymitis and fecaluria. Imaging methods such as pelvic X-ray, computed tomography (CT), sinus radiography, barium enema and other techniques confirmed the diagnosis. CT was the imaging modality of choice. In cases presenting with reduced levels of AL, minimal surrounding inflammation, and controlled infection, the RSVF was conservatively treated by urethral catheterization, antibiotics administration and parenteral nutrition. In cases of severe RSVF, incision and drainage of the abscess or fistula and urinary or fecal diversion surgery successfully resolved the fistula.
CONCLUSION This study provides an extensive analysis of RSVF, and outlines, summarizes and examines the causes, clinical manifestations, diagnostic procedures and treatment options, in order to prevent misdiagnosis and treatment errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Xiu Xia
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jin-Chun Cong
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hüttner FJ, Probst P, Mihaljevic A, Contin P, Dörr-Harim C, Ulrich A, Schneider M, Büchler MW, Diener MK, Knebel P. Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038930. [PMID: 33060088 PMCID: PMC7566726 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anastomotic leakage is the most important complication in colorectal surgery occurring in up to 20% after low anterior rectal resection. Therefore, a diverting ileostomy is usually created during low anterior resection to protect the anastomosis or rather to diminish the consequences in case of anastomotic leakage. The so-called virtual or ghost ileostomy is a pre-stage ostomy that can be easily exteriorised, if anastomotic leakage is suspected, in order to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. On the other hand, an actual ileostomy can be avoided in patients, who do not develop anastomotic leakage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The GHOST trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial comparing ghost ileostomy with conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. After screening for eligibility and obtaining informed consent, a total of 60 adult patients are included in the trial. Patients are intraoperatively randomised to the trial groups in a 1:1 ratio after assuring that none of the intraoperative exclusion criteria are present. The main outcome parameter is the comprehensive complication index as a measure of safety. Further outcomes include specific complications, stoma-related complications, complications of ileostomy closure, frequency of transformation of ghost ileostomy into conventional ileostomy, frequency of terminal ostomy creation, proportion of patients with an ostomy at 6 months after index surgery, anorectal function (Wexner score) and quality of life assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires. Follow-up for each individual patient will be 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The GHOST trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (reference number S-694/2017). If the intervention proves to be safe, loop ileostomy could be spared in a large proportion of patients, thus also avoiding stoma-related complications and a second operation (ileostomy closure) with its inherent complications in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00013997); Universal Trial Number: U1111-1208-9742.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix J Hüttner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pietro Contin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Surgical Department I, Städtische Kliniken Neuss, Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH, Neuss, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baloyiannis I, Perivoliotis K, Diamantis A, Tzovaras G. Virtual ileostomy in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 24:23-31. [PMID: 31820192 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leak (AL) following colorectal surgery can be a life-threatening complication. The use of a diverting stoma has been proposed, to prevent or reduce morbidity and mortality associated with AL. Stomas, however, have their own distinct complications. Thus, virtual ileostomy (VI) has been proposed as an alternative to diverting stoma. The aim of the present study was to further evaluate the role of VI through systematic review of existing literature. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The primary endpoint of our study was the estimation of the overall VI complication rate. Secondary endpoints included the identification of the VI-specific adverse outcomes, perioperative endpoints such as the length of hospital stay, transfusion and postoperative leak rates, description of the operative variations of VI reported VI operative variations and details regarding the primary operation and previous neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS In total, 11 studies and 554 patients were included in this systematic review. Overall, 158 laparoscopic and 191 open procedures were performed. The AL and VI conversion rates were 11.9% and 10.46%, respectively. The total complication rate was estimated to be 13.9%, while VI-specific adverse events were recorded in 2.1% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS VI could be a safe and effective alternative to a diverting stoma. Although currently, VI is not widely used, it could have a widespread application in laparoscopic surgery. However, definitive trials are needed before firm recommendations on the use of VI can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Baloyiannis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece.
| | - K Perivoliotis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - A Diamantis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - G Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morales-Conde S, Alarcón I, Yang T, Licardie E, Balla A. A Decalogue to Avoid Routine Ileostomy in Selected Patients With Border Line Risk to Develop Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive Low-Anterior Resection: A Pilot Study. Surg Innov 2019; 27:44-53. [PMID: 31789117 DOI: 10.1177/1553350619890720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. Protective ileostomy (PI) during anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer decreases the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) and its subsequent complications, but it may itself be the cause of morbidity. The aim is to report our protocol in the management of selected patients with borderline risk to develop AL after laparoscopic AR and ghost ileostomy (GI) creation. Methods. Patients who underwent AR were stratified based on the risk to develop AL. Steps to avoid PI were splenic flexure mobilization, reduced pelvic bleeding, to employ different stapler charge if neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is performed, to perform a horizontal section of the rectum, to evaluate the anastomotic vascularization with a fluorescence angiography, to perform a side-to-end anastomosis, intraoperative methylene blue test, pelvic and transanal drainage tubes placement, and the GI creation. After surgery, inflammatory blood markers were monitored to detect potential leakages. Results. Twelve patients were included. In one case, the specimen proximal section was changed after fluorescence angiography. There were no conversions in this group of patients. One postoperative AL occurred and was treated with radiological drainage placement, not being necessary to convert the GI. PI was avoided in 100% of cases. Conclusions. Patients' characteristics cannot be changed, but several steps were used to avoid routine PI creation. The present protocol could be a valuable option to avoid PI in selected patients. Further studies with a wider sample size, and defined criteria to stratify the patients based on the risk to develop AL, are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isaias Alarcón
- University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio," University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Tao Yang
- University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio," University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eugenio Licardie
- University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio," University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Andrea Balla
- University Hospital "Virgen del Rocio," University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.,University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23:1037-1056. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02099-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, Odeh SF, Möslein G, Zirngibl H. Intestinal Ostomy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2019; 115:182-187. [PMID: 29607805 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 100 000 ostomy carriers are estimated to live in Germany today. The creation of an ostomy represents a major life event that can be associated with impaired quality of life. Optimal ostomy creation and proper ostomy care are crucially important determinants of the success of treatment and of the patients' quality of life. METHODS This article is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, GoogleScholar, and Scopus, and on the authors' experience. RESULTS Intestinal stomata can be created using either the small or the large bowel. More than 75% of all stomata are placed as part of the treatment of colorectal cancer. The incidence of stoma-related complications is reported to be 10-70%. Skin irritation, erosion, and ulceration are the most common early complications, with a combined incidence of 25-34%, while stoma prolapse is the most common late complication, with an incidence of 8-75%. Most early complications can be managed conservatively, while most late complications require surgical revision. In 19% of cases, an ostomy that was initially planned to be temporary becomes permanent. Inappropriate stoma location and inadequate ostomy care are the most common causes of early complications. Both surgical and patient-related factors influence late complications. CONCLUSION Every step from the planning of a stoma to its postoperative care should be discussed with the patient in detail. Preoperative marking is essential for an optimal stoma site. Optimal patient management with the involvement of an ostomy nurse increases ostomy acceptance, reduces ostomy-related complications, and improves the quality of life of ostomy carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Ambe
- Department of; Visceral, Minimally Invasive, and Oncological Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf; Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Chair of Surgery II, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke; Center for Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumors, Chair of Surgery II, Helios; University Hospital Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Flor-Lorente B, Sánchez-Guillén L, Pellino G, Frasson M, García-Granero Á, Ponce M, Domingo S, Paya V, García-Granero E. “Virtual ileostomy” combined with early endoscopy to avoid a diversion ileostomy in low or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. A preliminary report. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:375-383. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01776-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
15
|
The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surg Today 2018; 49:451-459. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1736-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
16
|
Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Małczak P, Wysocki M, Witowski J, Torbicz G, Major P, Mizera M, Dembiński M, Migaczewski M, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M. Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery - systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 9:20816-20825. [PMID: 29755692 PMCID: PMC5945534 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The role of a defunctioning ileostomy in every anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to review the current literature to determine the impact of ileostomy creation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing anterior rectal resection with TME. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. We analyzed data up to October 2017. Eligible studies had to compare patients with vs. without a defunctioning ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery and comprise data on anastomotic leakage in both groups. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes included the complication rate, mortality, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay and 30-day readmission. Results Initial search yielded 1,966 articles. Thorough evaluation resulted in 13 eligible articles which were analyzed. Leakage rate (RR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.67) and the number of reoperations (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.94) were significantly lower in the defunctioning stoma group. Morbidity was significantly higher in the stoma group (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.05–1.65). Analysis of mortality, length of hospital stay and readmission rate did not show any significant differences. Conclusion A defunctioning ileostomy may decrease the anastomotic leakage rate, additionally significantly reducing the risk of reoperations but it may also increase the overall complication rate. The presence of the protective stoma has no effect on mortality, length of hospital stay and readmission rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Pisarska
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Natalia Gajewska
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Piotr Małczak
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Michał Wysocki
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Jan Witowski
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Torbicz
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Piotr Major
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Magdalena Mizera
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Marcin Dembiński
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Marcin Migaczewski
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Andrzej Budzyński
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.,Centre for Research, Training and Innovation in Surgery (CERTAIN Surgery), Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Initial experience with taTME in patients undergoing laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:971-974. [PMID: 29168141 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1730-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a minimally invasive technique which was developed to overcome the difficulties associated with the "top-down" pelvic dissection by enabling a "bottom-up" dissection in patients with mid- and low rectal cancer. While this technique was primarily designed to manage tumors in the mid- and lower rectum, its spectrum of indications has been broadened to include benign colorectal pathologies. The aim of the present study was to assess our initial experience with taTME in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). METHODS All consecutive patients (undergoing prophylactic restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for FAP using taTME between April and October 2016 at our institution) were included in the study. RESULTS There were 8 patients (6 females and 2 males). The median age was 19.5 years (range 16-31 years). In all cases, surgery was successfully completed using with taTME. No perioperative complications were recorded. A median of 5 bowel movements (range 4-6 bowel movements) with intermittent anti-diarrheal medication was recorded in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Our initial experience with 8 consecutive cases suggests taTME is safe and effective in patients undergoing prophylactic restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for FAP.
Collapse
|
18
|
Routine Virtual Ileostomy Following Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. World J Surg 2017; 42:1867-1871. [PMID: 29147895 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4365-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. A diverting ileostomy is routinely used to prevent or reduce morbidity and mortality following AL. However, a diverting ileostomy cannot prevent AL. Besides, diverting ileostomy might be associated with relevant complications. Herein, we introduce the virtual ileostomy as an alternative to diverting ileostomy in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS The results of eight patients, five females and three males with a median age of 19.5 ± 6.0 years (range 16.0-31.0 years), undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA and virtual ileostomy for FAP are presented. RESULTS All cases were laparoscopically managed. The virtual ileostomy was released between postoperative day 7 and 9. No AL was registered. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in all cases. CONCLUSION A diverting ileostomy was prevented via the use of virtual ileostomy in all cases. Thus, virtual ileostomy is a good alternative to diverting ileostomy in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for FAP.
Collapse
|
19
|
Belkin N, Bordeianou LG, Shellito PC, Hawkins AT. Morbidity Associated with Diverting Loop Ileostomies: Weighing Diversion in Rectosigmoid Resection. Am Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481708300739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Anterior resection with primary anastomosis is the procedure of choice for patients with rectosigmoid cancers with good sphincter function. Surgeons may perform an associated diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) to minimize the likelihood and/or the severity of an anastomotic leak. To examine the morbidity of DLIs, we performed a review of a prospectively maintained database. Participants included all patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital who underwent anterior resection from January 2013 to July 2015 for rectosigmoid cancers and who subsequently underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was time to start of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes included length of hospitalization, perioperative complications, and 60-day postoperative complications. Inclusion criteria were met in 57 patients and DLI was performed in 21 (37%). The DLI group had higher estimated blood loss (431.7 vs 192.1 mL, P = 0.03) and a longer operation time (3.7 vs 2.3 hours, P = 0.0007). The DLI group took over a week longer to start adjuvant chemotherapy than the non-DLI group (median time to chemo: 43 vs 34 days, P = 0.002). Postoperatively, DLI was associated with a longer hospitalization (6.7 vs 3.1 days, P = 0.0003), more perioperative complications (57.1% vs 13.9%, P = 0.0006), and more 60-day read-missions or emergency department visits (38.1% vs 5.6%, P = 0.002). Ostomies are associated with appreciable morbidity. In turn, they do not eliminate postoperative complications. Surgeons should closely consider ostomy morbidity in rectosigmoid resection and institute a proactive approach toward identification and prevention of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liliana G. Bordeianou
- Colorectal Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul C. Shellito
- Colorectal Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander T. Hawkins
- Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|