1
|
Are C, Schissel M, Smith LM, Rao TS. Series on the Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery: Introduction-Intent and Content. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4868-4872. [PMID: 38831196 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15554-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery plays a key role in the multi-disciplinary cancer care pathway. Nearly 80% of patients with solid tumors will require surgical intervention during the course of their disease. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these patients do not have access to safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care. The first Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery shone a light on this grave situation and outlined some strategies to address them. The second Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery (TLO- II) was conceived to continue the work of its predecessor by developing a roadmap of practical solutions to propel improvements in cancer surgical care globally. METHODS The Commission was developed by involving approximately 50 cancer care leaders and experts from different parts of the world to ensure diversity of input and global applicability. RESULTS The Commission identified nine solutional domains that are considered essential to deliver safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care. These nine domains were further refined to develop solutions specific to each of the six World Health Organization regions. Based on the above solutions, we developed eight action items that are intended to propel improvements in cancer surgical care on the global stage. CONCLUSIONS The second Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery builds on the first Commission by developing a pragmatic roadmap of practical solutions that we hope will ensure access to safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care for everyone regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrakanth Are
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Makayla Schissel
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Lynette M Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - T S Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavtarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Branche C, Sakowitz S, Porter G, Cho NY, Chervu N, Mallick S, Bakhtiyar SS, Benharash P. Utilization of minimally invasive colectomy at safety-net hospitals in the United States. Surgery 2024; 176:172-179. [PMID: 38729887 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior literature has reported inferior surgical outcomes and reduced access to minimally invasive procedures at safety-net hospitals. However, this relationship has not yet been elucidated for elective colectomy. We sought to characterize the association between safety-net hospitals and likelihood of minimally invasive resection, perioperative outcomes, and costs. METHODS All adult (≥18 years) hospitalization records entailing elective colectomy were identified in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Centers in the top quartile of safety-net burden were considered safety-net hospitals (others: non-safety-net hospitals). Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the impact of safety-net hospitals status on key outcomes. RESULTS Of ∼532,640 patients, 95,570 (17.9%) were treated at safety-net hospitals. The safety-net hospitals cohort was younger and more often of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity. After adjustment, care at safety-net hospitals remained independently associated with reduced odds of minimally invasive surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.97). The interaction between safety-net hospital status and race was significant, such that Black race remained linked with lower odds of minimally invasive surgery at safety-net hospitals (reference: White race). Additionally, safety-net hospitals was associated with greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.34, confidence interval 1.04-1.74) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 1.15, confidence interval 1.08-1.22), as well as increased length of stay (β+0.26 days, confidence interval 0.17-0.35) and costs (β+$2,510, confidence interval 2,020-3,000). CONCLUSION Care at safety-net hospitals was linked with lower odds of minimally invasive colectomy, as well as greater complications and costs. Black patients treated at safety-net hospitals demonstrated reduced likelihood of minimally invasive surgery, relative to White patients. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the root causes of these disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corynn Branche
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. https://twitter.com/CoreLabUCLA
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. https://twitter.com/sarasakowitz
| | - Giselle Porter
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nam Yong Cho
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Saad Mallick
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Peyman Benharash
- CORELAB, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liang B, Peng Y, Yang W, Yang Y, Li B, Wei Y, Liu F. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01769-6. [PMID: 38955633 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive hepatectomy for difficult lesions located in posterosuperior segments (segments I, IVa, VII and VIII) remains challenging. The value of robotic liver resection (RLR) compared with laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for posterosuperior segments is controversial. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to validate the safety and efficacy of RLR in posterosuperior segments. METHODS The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to identify available research published up to October 2023. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan software version 5.3. RESULTS Six studies with a total of 2289 patients (RLR: n = 749; LLR: n = 1540) were included in this meta-analysis. The RLR group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -119.54 ml, 95% CI: -178.89 to -60.19, P < 0.0001), fewer blood transfusions (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.80, P = 0.001), a lower conversion rate (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.61, P < 0.0001), and a shorter operative time (WMD = -27.16 min, 95% CI: -35.95 to -18.36, P < 0.00001). DISCUSSION Compared with LLR, RLR for lesions in the posterosuperior segments could be safe and effective, and it has superior surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Liang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yufu Peng
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wugui Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yubo Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonçalves-Costa D, Barbosa JP, Quesado R, Lopes V, Barbosa J. Robotic surgery versus Laparoscopic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes and cost systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:175. [PMID: 38842610 PMCID: PMC11156741 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03368-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to compare the operative time, intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, mortality, and cost associated with Robotic Surgery (RS) and Laparascopic Surgery (LS) in anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases. Studies comparing short-term outcomes and cost between RS and LS in patients with anti-reflux and hiatal hernia were included. Data on operative time, complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, mortality, and cost were extracted. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the MINORS scale. RESULTS Fourteen retrospective observational studies involving a total of 555,368 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no statistically significant difference in operative time, intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, and mortality between RS and LS. However, LS was associated with lower costs compared to RS. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that RS has non-inferior short-term outcomes in anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery, compared to LS. LS is more cost-effective, but RS offers potential benefits such as improved visualization and enhanced surgical techniques. Further research, including randomized controlled trials and long-term outcome studies, is needed to validate and refine these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Gonçalves-Costa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - José Pedro Barbosa
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Stomatology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rodrigo Quesado
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vítor Lopes
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - José Barbosa
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Toma M, Oprea V, Grad O, Staines H, Bucuri CE, Andercou O, Gherghinescu M, Molnar C. Early outcomes of open anterior versus posterior components separation with transversus abdominis release for large median incisional hernias: a retrospective stepwise analysis. Hernia 2024; 28:803-813. [PMID: 37975991 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02920-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex incisional hernia is still a debatable topic, with increasing incidence and an increased local and systemic postoperative morbidity and mortality. The size of the defect is a risk factor for both difficult closure and 30-day readmission due to complications. The main option for closure such defect is a mesh augmented component separation technique. The goal was to evaluate 30-day wound events and general complications including 90 days mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We present a retrospective study that includes patients from two different university hospitals who underwent open incisional hernia repair with anterior component or posterior component separation between January 2015 and December 2021. Only non-contaminated adult patients (over 18 years old) with postoperative primary or recurrent median abdominal wall defects larger than 6 cm and with complete fascial closure were included. Demographics (age, gender, Body Mass Index-BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification-ASA score), recurrence rank, and co-morbidities), operative details, patient outcomes complications were collected. A native abdomen/pelvis computerized tomography (CT) scan was performed preoperatively in all patients and the anatomy of the defect and volumetry (abdominal cavity volume, incisional hernia volume and peritoneal volume) were evaluated. One of the component separation technique was performed according to Carbonell's equation. RESULTS Two hundred and two patients (101 from each group) were included. The patients with posterior component separation were more comorbid and with larger defects. The procedure was longer with 80 min but overall length of hospital stay shorter (p < 0.001) for posterior component separation. Seroma, hematoma and skin necrosis were equally distributed for both group of patients and there was no direct relation to surgery (OR 0.887, 95% CI 0.370-2.125, p = 0.788; OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.677-3.33, p = 0.318 and OR 0.386, 95% CI 0.117-1.276, p = 0.119). Surgical Site Infection rate was increased for anterior component separation (p =0.004). CONCLUSION Complex incisional hernia repair is a challenge given by a large amount of wound complications. Choosing between anterior and posterior component separation is still a source of significant debate. We were not able to depict significant different rates of complications between the procedures and we couldn't find any specific factor related to complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihai Toma
- Clinical Department of Surgery, "Constantin Papilian" Emergency Clinical Military Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, 22 G-ral Traian Mosoiu, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
- "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Targu-Mures, Romania
| | - Valentin Oprea
- Clinical Department of Surgery, "Constantin Papilian" Emergency Clinical Military Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, 22 G-ral Traian Mosoiu, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania.
- "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Ovidiu Grad
- Clinical Department of Surgery, "Constantin Papilian" Emergency Clinical Military Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, 22 G-ral Traian Mosoiu, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
- "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Carmen E Bucuri
- Clinical Department of Surgery, "Constantin Papilian" Emergency Clinical Military Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, 22 G-ral Traian Mosoiu, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
- "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
| | - Octavian Andercou
- "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
- Second Clinical Department of Surgery, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Cluj-Napoca-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mircea Gherghinescu
- "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Targu-Mures, Romania
- First Clinical Department of Surgery, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Targu-Mures, Romania
| | - Calin Molnar
- "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Targu-Mures, Romania
- First Clinical Department of Surgery, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Targu-Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fadel MG, Walshaw J, Pecchini F, Elhadi M, Yiasemidou M, Boal M, Carrano FM, Massey LH, Antoniou SA, Nickel F, Perretta S, Fuchs HF, Hanna GB, Francis NK, Kontovounisios C. European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC): Protocol for the development of a consensus in robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery trainees. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302648. [PMID: 38820412 PMCID: PMC11142498 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid adoption of robotic surgical systems across Europe has led to a critical gap in training and credentialing for gastrointestinal (GI) surgeons. Currently, there is no existing standardised curriculum to guide robotic training, assessment and certification for GI trainees. This manuscript describes the protocol to achieve a pan-European consensus on the essential components of a comprehensive training programme for GI robotic surgery through a five-stage process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In Stage 1, a Steering Committee, consisting of international experts, trainees and educationalists, has been established to lead and coordinate the consensus development process. In Stage 2, a systematic review of existing multi-specialty robotic training curricula will be performed to inform the formulation of key position statements. In Stage 3, a comprehensive survey will be disseminated across Europe to capture the current state of robotic training and identify potential challenges and opportunities for improvement. In Stage 4, an international panel of GI surgeons, trainees, and robotic theatre staff will participate in a three-round Delphi process, seeking ≥ 70% agreement on crucial aspects of the training curriculum. Industry and patient representatives will be involved as external advisors throughout this process. In Stage 5, the robotic training curriculum for GI trainees will be finalised in a dedicated consensus meeting, culminating in the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. REGISTRATION DETAILS The study protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/br87d/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G. Fadel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Josephine Walshaw
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Pecchini
- Division of General Surgery, Emergency and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Marina Yiasemidou
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa H. Massey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silvana Perretta
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
- NHC University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hans F. Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - George B. Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nader K. Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- 2nd Department of Surgery, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Myla K, Bou-Ayash N, Kim WC, Bugaev N, Bawazeer M. Is implementation of robotic-assisted procedures in acute care general surgery cost-effective? J Robot Surg 2024; 18:223. [PMID: 38801638 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01912-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, the use and importance of robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery has increased. Across various surgical specialties, robotic technology has gained popularity through its use of 3D visualization, optimal ergonomic positioning, and precise instrument manipulation. This growing interest has also been seen in acute care surgery, where laparoscopic procedures are used more frequently. Despite the growing popularity of robotic surgery in the acute care surgical realm, there is very little research on the utility of robotics regarding its effects on health outcomes and cost-effectiveness. The current literature indicates some value in utilizing robotic technology in specific urgent procedures, such as cholecystectomies and incarcerated hernia repairs; however, the high cost of robotic surgery was found to be a potential barrier to its widespread use in acute care surgery. This narrative literature review aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in surgical procedures that are often done in urgent settings: cholecystectomies, inguinal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair, and appendectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumudini Myla
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Woon Cho Kim
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nikolay Bugaev
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohammed Bawazeer
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khewater T, Al Madshush AM, Altidlawi MI, Faya H, Alanazi M, Alqahtani MMM, Alghamdi IA, Almotawa MA, Mirdad MT, Alqahtani BA, Sleem Y, Mirdad R. Comparing Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e60959. [PMID: 38910645 PMCID: PMC11193849 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical intervention. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques, specifically laparoscopic (LR) and robot-assisted (RR) approaches, have reshaped the landscape of surgical options. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair through a comprehensive review of the literature. A systematic search of databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to November 30, 2023. Fifteen studies, encompassing a total of 64,568 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates for key outcomes, including duration of operation, overall complications, and surgical site infection (SSI), were calculated using random-effects models. This meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the duration of surgery, favoring laparoscopic repair over robot-assisted techniques (mean difference: 26.85 minutes, 95% CI (1.16, 52.54)). Overall complications did not significantly differ between the two approaches (odds ratio: 1.54, 95% CI (0.83, 2.85)). However, a significantly greater risk of SSI was identified for robot-assisted procedures (odds ratio: 3.32, 95% CI (2.63, 4.19)). This meta-analysis provides insights into the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic and robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair. While laparoscopy has shorter operative times and comparable overall complication rates, the increased risk of SSI during robot-assisted procedures necessitates careful consideration in clinical decision-making. Surgeons and healthcare providers should weigh these findings according to patient characteristics, emphasizing a personalized approach to surgical decision-making. The evolving landscape of inguinal hernia repair warrants ongoing research to refine techniques and optimize outcomes for the benefit of patients undergoing these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talal Khewater
- Bariatric and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU
| | | | | | - Hamad Faya
- Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU
| | - Maryam Alanazi
- General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yasmeen Sleem
- College of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marincola G, Procopio PF, Pennestrì F, Gallucci P, Voloudakis N, Ciccoritti L, Greco F, Salvi G, Prioli F, De Crea C, Raffaelli M. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic bariatric procedures in super-obese patients: clinical and economic outcomes. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:34. [PMID: 38231461 PMCID: PMC10794378 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01748-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
The increased operative time and costs represent the main limitations of robotic technology application to bariatric surgery. Robotic platforms may help the surgeon to overcome the technical difficulties in super-obese (SO, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) patients, in which multi-quadrant operations could be challenging. We aimed to evaluate the effect of robot-assisted (R) versus laparoscopic (L) approaches in Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in SO and Super-Super Obese (SSO, BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2) patients in terms of outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Bariatric procedures performed from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2, primary SADI-S or RYGB. Operative time (OT), early complications, post-operative stay (POS), overall costs and follow-up data were analyzed. A subgroup analysis for surgical procedures and SSO patients was also performed. Among 4596 patients, 174 RYGB and 91 SADI-S in BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 patients were selected. After Propensity Score Matching analysis, two groups of patients were identified (laparoscopic and robot-assisted), each one composed of 18 RYGB and 26 SADI-S. Intraoperative and post-operative complication rates and POS were comparable. Mean OT was longer in robotic procedures compared with laparoscopy (199.1 ± 65.7 and 109.5 ± 39.1 min, respectively, p < 0.001). The difference in OT was eliminated after only SSO patients were included in the analysis (172.7 ± 24.1 vs 152.6 ± 26.2 min for R-SADI-S and L-SADI-S, respectively, p = 0.107). Robotic surgeries were associated with higher costs (8134.6 ± 1886.7 and 2386.7 ± 388.2 € in R-RYGB and L-RYGB, respectively; 7996.6 ± 873.1 and 3954.6 ± 631.1 € in R-SADI-S and L-SADI-S). Despite increased costs, robotic approach may represent an added value in more complex cases such as SSO patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marincola
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Priscilla Francesca Procopio
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennestrì
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Pierpaolo Gallucci
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Voloudakis
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Ciccoritti
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Salvi
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Prioli
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmela De Crea
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca di Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hays SB, Corvino G, Lorié BD, McMichael WV, Mehdi SA, Rieser C, Rojas AE, Hogg ME. Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:164-182. [PMID: 38031870 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Hays
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gaetano Corvino
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin D Lorié
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - William V McMichael
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Syed A Mehdi
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Caroline Rieser
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Aram E Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Are C, Murthy SS, Sullivan R, Schissel M, Chowdhury S, Alatise O, Anaya D, Are M, Balch C, Bartlett D, Brennan M, Cairncross L, Clark M, Deo SVS, Dudeja V, D'Ugo D, Fadhil I, Giuliano A, Gopal S, Gutnik L, Ilbawi A, Jani P, Kingham TP, Lorenzon L, Leiphrakpam P, Leon A, Martinez-Said H, McMasters K, Meltzer DO, Mutebi M, Zafar SN, Naik V, Newman L, Oliveira AF, Park DJ, Pramesh CS, Rao S, Subramanyeshwar Rao T, Bargallo-Rocha E, Romanoff A, Rositch AF, Rubio IT, Salvador de Castro Ribeiro H, Sbaity E, Senthil M, Smith L, Toi M, Turaga K, Yanala U, Yip CH, Zaghloul A, Anderson BO. Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e472-e518. [PMID: 37924819 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00412-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
The first Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery was published in 2015 and serves as a landmark paper in the field of cancer surgery. The Commission highlighted the burden of cancer and the importance of cancer surgery, while documenting the many inadequacies in the ability to deliver safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgical care. This Commission builds on the first Commission by focusing on solutions and actions to improve access to cancer surgery globally, developed by drawing upon the expertise from cancer surgery leaders across the world. We present solution frameworks in nine domains that can improve access to cancer surgery. These nine domains were refined to identify solutions specific to the six WHO regions. On the basis of these solutions, we developed eight actions to propel essential improvements in the global capacity for cancer surgery. Our initiatives are broad in scope, pragmatic, affordable, and contextually applicable, and aimed at cancer surgeons as well as leaders, administrators, elected officials, and health policy advocates. We envision that the solutions and actions contained within the Commission will address inequities and promote safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgery for every patient, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrakanth Are
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Shilpa S Murthy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Makayla Schissel
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Sanjib Chowdhury
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Olesegun Alatise
- Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Daniel Anaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Madhuri Are
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Charles Balch
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Murray Brennan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lydia Cairncross
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Matthew Clark
- University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S V S Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vikas Dudeja
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Armando Giuliano
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Satish Gopal
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Lily Gutnik
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andre Ilbawi
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pankaj Jani
- Department of Surgery, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Laura Lorenzon
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Premila Leiphrakpam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Augusto Leon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Kelly McMasters
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Hiram C Polk, Jr MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - David O Meltzer
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Syed Nabeel Zafar
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vibhavari Naik
- Department of Anesthesiology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Lisa Newman
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Do Joong Park
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - C S Pramesh
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Saieesh Rao
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - T Subramanyeshwar Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Anya Romanoff
- Department of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne F Rositch
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Eman Sbaity
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Lynette Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Masakazi Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ujwal Yanala
- Surgical Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Department of Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brunner M, ElGendy A, Denz A, Weber G, Grützmann R, Krautz C. [Robot-assisted visceral surgery in Germany : Analysis of the current status and trends of the last 5 years using data from the StuDoQ|Robotics registry]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 94:940-947. [PMID: 37500803 PMCID: PMC10587021 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01940-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted systems have been increasingly used in general surgery for several years. Accordingly, the number of systems installed in Germany has also rapidly increased. While around 100 robot-assisted systems were used in German hospitals in 2018, this figure had already risen to more than 200 by 2022. The aim of this article is to present the current state of development and trends in robotic surgery in Germany. For this purpose, data from the StuDoQ|Robotics register were analyzed. Furthermore, a descriptive analysis of concomitant diagnosis-related groups (DRG) data was carried out via the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis), for a better assessment of the representativeness of the StuDoQ|Robotics register data. In both data sets, the annual number of robot-assisted visceral surgery procedures in Germany steadily increased. Compared to the DRG data, only 3.7% up to a maximum of 36.7% of all robot-assisted procedures performed were documented in the StuDoQ|Robotics register, depending on the type of procedure. Colorectal resections were the most frequent robot-assisted procedures (StuDoQ: 32.5% and 36.7% vs. DRG data: 24.2% and 29.7%) and had, for example, low mortality rates (StuDoQ: 1% and 1% vs. DRG data: 2.3% and 1.3%). Due to the low coverage rates of robot-assisted esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and liver interventions, no valid statements could be derived from the StuDoQ data for these areas. With the current coverage rates, the informative value of the StuDoQ|Robotics register is considerably limited for some types of intervention. In the future, measures should therefore be explored that lead to a significant increase in the coverage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Brunner
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - Amr ElGendy
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Axel Denz
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Georg Weber
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Christian Krautz
- Klink für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Espin Alvarez F, García-Domingo MI, Cremades Pérez M, Pardo Aranda F, Vidal Piñeiro L, Herrero Fonollosa E, Navinés López J, Zárate Pinedo A, Camps-Lasa J, Cugat Andorrà E. Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: the choice and the future. Cir Esp 2023; 101:765-771. [PMID: 37119949 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently well established as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure, using either a laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approach. METHODS Out of 83 DP performed between January 2018 and March 2022, 57 cases (68.7%) were performed using MIS: 35 LDP and 22 RDP (da Vinci Xi). We have assessed the experience with the two techniques and analyzed the value of the robotic approach. Cases of conversion have been examined in detail. RESULTS The mean operative times for LDP and RDP were 201.2 (SD 47.8) and 247.54 (SD 35.8) minutes, respectively (P = NS). No differences were observed in length of hospital stay or conversion rate: 6 (5-34) vs. 5.6 (5-22) days, and 4 (11.4%) vs. 3 (13.6%) cases, respectively (P = NS). The readmission rate was 3/35 patients (11.4%) treated with LDP and 6/22 (27.3%) cases of RDP (P = NS). There were no differences in morbidity (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III) between the two groups. Mortality was one case in the robotic group (a patient with early conversion due to vascular involvement). The rate of R0 resection was greater and statistically significant in the RDP group (77.1% vs. 90.9%) (P = .04). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. Surgical planning and stepwise implementation based on prior experience help surgeons successfully perform technically demanding procedures. RDP could be the approach of choice in distal pancreatectomy, and it is not inferior to LDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Espin Alvarez
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.
| | - María Isabel García-Domingo
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Manel Cremades Pérez
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo Aranda
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Laura Vidal Piñeiro
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Eric Herrero Fonollosa
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Jordi Navinés López
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Alba Zárate Pinedo
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Judith Camps-Lasa
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Esteban Cugat Andorrà
- Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain; Unidad de Cirugía de Hepatobiliopancreática, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel N, Chaudhari K, Jyotsna G, Joshi JS. Surgical Frontiers: A Comparative Review of Robotics Versus Laparoscopy in Gynecological Interventions. Cureus 2023; 15:e49752. [PMID: 38161931 PMCID: PMC10757673 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
This review comprehensively examines the current state and future directions of gynecological surgery, focusing on the comparative analysis of laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The overview highlights the evolution of these surgical techniques, emphasizing their impact on patient outcomes, procedural efficiency, and safety profiles. The analysis encompasses critical factors such as cost-effectiveness, learning curves, and implications for postoperative recovery. The future of gynecological surgery is envisioned through emerging technologies, including augmented reality, single-incision laparoscopy, and artificial intelligence. The coexistence of laparoscopy and robotics is explored, acknowledging their respective strengths and roles in shaping women's healthcare. In conclusion, the dynamic nature of the field is underscored, emphasizing the need for a patient-centered and adaptable approach. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, engineers, and researchers is pivotal in unlocking these innovations' full potential, ensuring continued advancements in gynecological surgery for improved outcomes and enhanced patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nainita Patel
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Kamlesh Chaudhari
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Garapati Jyotsna
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Jalormy S Joshi
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Menke V, Kottmann T, Willeke F, Hansen O. Learning curves and procedural times in Senhance®-robotic assisted fundoplication: results from 237 consecutive patients undergoing robotic fundoplication in a single center as part of the European TRUST Robotic Surgery Registry Study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8254-8262. [PMID: 37670190 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10226-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring an operative solution is common. Minimally invasive surgery to generate an anti-reflux barrier at the distal esophagus following the principle of the "floppy Nissen" technique has become the gold standard. Advanced robotic-assisted systems may deliver more consisted outcomes. METHODS This registry study analyzed safety and efficacy of the Senhance® surgical system in the surgical treatment of reflux disease and procedural proficiency. Data from 237 consecutive patients operated in a single center were evaluated. Historic standard laparoscopies from the same center were analyzed to compare robotic surgery learning curve effects. RESULTS Using the Senhance® Surgical System, during the first 50 patients there was a significant decrease in surgery time which was maintained over the duration of study, pointing to the surgical staff's system-specific learning. After this phase, procedural times were comparable between the robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery. The effect of learning was greater than for standard laparoscopy. For 237 patients, there were four conversions to laparoscopic surgery. Two serious adverse events were recorded, both cardiac in nature and not related to the use of the robot. CONCLUSIONS Robotic fundoplication was swiftly implemented in a non-university hospital with 65 surgical beds. The operating time was no longer than in standard laparoscopy, the procedure was more standardized than open or laparoscopic surgery and hospitalization times may have been sustainably shortened. The autonomy at the system's digital platform (cockpit) to conduct robotic fundoplications is a big step forward in surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianda Menke
- Allgemeinchirurgie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Wesel GmbH, Schermbecker Landstraße 88, 46485, Wesel, Germany.
- The TRUST European Registry Working Group, Siegen, Germany.
| | | | - Frank Willeke
- The TRUST European Registry Working Group, Siegen, Germany
- St Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen gGmbH, Siegen, Germany
| | - Olaf Hansen
- Allgemeinchirurgie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Wesel GmbH, Schermbecker Landstraße 88, 46485, Wesel, Germany
- The TRUST European Registry Working Group, Siegen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cheng Y, Zhu Y. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Adrenalectomy for Large Pheochromocytoma (≥ 5cm): A Retrospective Study. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:1207-1216. [PMID: 37937145 PMCID: PMC10625893 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s435791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients with large (≥5cm) pheochromocytomas who underwent adrenalectomy. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) for large pheochromocytoma (≥ 5cm) at our center between January 2015 to February 2023. We compared the perioperative outcomes between the two groups and investigated impact of high Nor-Metanephrine (NMN) levels on perioperative outcomes by analyzing this subgroup. Results A total of 115 patients were included in the study, with 48 patients in the robotic group and 67 patients in the laparoscopic group. The following significant difference were identified in favor of RA: shorter operative (excluding docking time) time (190.0 vs 220.0 min, p=0.002), lower estimated blood loss (50.0 vs 120.0 mL, p=0.013), however, RA group has higher surgical expenses (37933.0 vs 7936.0 CNY, p< 0.001). This finding remained consistent when analyzing patients with high NMN levels. Conclusion Patients with large pheochromocytoma may experience reduced blood loss and shorter operative time when undergoing robot-assisted adrenalectomy. However, it is important to note that the RA approach is associated with significantly higher costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuling Cheng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ndong A, Diallo AC, Rouhi AD, Diao ML, Yi W, Tendeng JN, Williams NN, Cissé M, Dumon KR, Konaté I. Factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting: a single-center prospective study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8072-8079. [PMID: 37640956 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10373-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopy has a clear patient benefit related to postoperative morbidity but may not be as commonly performed in low-and middle-income countries. The decision to convert to laparotomy can be complex and involve factors related to the surgeon, patient, and procedure. The objective of this work is to analyze the factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting. METHODS This is a single-center prospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between May 1, 2018 and October 31, 2021. The parameters studied were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), intraoperative complication (e.g., accidental enterotomy, hemorrhage), equipment malfunction (e.g., technical failure of the equipment, break in CO2 supply line), operating time, and conversion rate. RESULTS A total of 123 laparoscopic surgeries were performed. The average age of patients was 31.2 years (range 11-75). The procedures performed included appendix procedures (48%), followed by gynecological (18.7%), gallbladder (14.6%), digestive (10.56%), and abdominal procedures (4%). The average length of hospitalization was 3 days (range 1-16). Conversion to laparotomy was reported in 8.9% (n = 11) cases. Equipment malfunction was encountered in 9.8% (n = 12) cases. Surgical complications were noted in 11 cases (8.9%). Risk factors for conversion were shown to be BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR 4.6; p = 0.034), intraoperative complications (OR 12.6; p = 0.028), and equipment malfunction (OR 9.4; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION A better understanding of the underlying factors associated with high conversion rates, such as overweight/obesity, intraoperative complications, and equipment failure, is the first step toward surgical planning to reduce postoperative morbidity in low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdourahmane Ndong
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
| | - Adja C Diallo
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| | - Armaun D Rouhi
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohamed L Diao
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| | - William Yi
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacques N Tendeng
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| | - Noel N Williams
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mamadou Cissé
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| | - Kristoffel R Dumon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahima Konaté
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hirohata Y, Sogabe M, Miyazaki T, Kawase T, Kawashima K. Confidence-aware self-supervised learning for dense monocular depth estimation in dynamic laparoscopic scene. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15380. [PMID: 37717055 PMCID: PMC10505201 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42713-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper tackles the challenge of accurate depth estimation from monocular laparoscopic images in dynamic surgical environments. The lack of reliable ground truth due to inconsistencies within these images makes this a complex task. Further complicating the learning process is the presence of noise elements like bleeding and smoke. We propose a model learning framework that uses a generic laparoscopic surgery video dataset for training, aimed at achieving precise monocular depth estimation in dynamic surgical settings. The architecture employs binocular disparity confidence information as a self-supervisory signal, along with the disparity information from a stereo laparoscope. Our method ensures robust learning amidst outliers, influenced by tissue deformation, smoke, and surgical instruments, by utilizing a unique loss function. This function adjusts the selection and weighting of depth data for learning based on their given confidence. We trained the model using the Hamlyn Dataset and verified it with Hamlyn Dataset test data and a static dataset. The results show exceptional generalization performance and efficacy for various scene dynamics, laparoscope types, and surgical sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhide Hirohata
- The Department of Information Physics and Computing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
| | - Maina Sogabe
- The Department of Information Physics and Computing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
| | - Tetsuro Miyazaki
- The Department of Information Physics and Computing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Kawase
- The School of Engineering Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo, 120-8551, Japan
| | - Kenji Kawashima
- The Department of Information Physics and Computing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Panse NS, Prasath V, Quinn PL, Chokshi RJ. Economic evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6806-6817. [PMID: 37264228 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic approach in paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair may improve outcomes over laparoscopic approach, though at additional cost. This study aimed to compare cost-effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic PEH repair. METHODS A decision tree was created analyzing cost-effectiveness of robotic and laparoscopic PEH repair. Costs were obtained from 2021 Medicare data and were accumulated within 60 months after surgery. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Branch-point probabilities and costs of robotic surgery consumables were obtained from published literature. The primary outcome of interest was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A secondary analysis including attributable capital and maintenance costs of robotic surgery was conducted as well. RESULTS Laparoscopic repair yielded 3.660 QALYs at $35,843.82. Robotic repair yielded 3.661 QALYs at $36,342.57, with an ICER of $779,488.62/QALY. Robotic repair was favored when rates of open conversion and symptom recurrence were low, or with reduced cost of robotic instruments. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored laparoscopic repair in 100% of simulations. When accounting for costs of robotic technology, robotic approach was preferred only in unrealistic clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic repair is likely more cost-effective for most institutions, though results were relatively similar. With experienced surgeons who surpass the initial learning curve, robotic surgery may improve outcomes enough to be cost-effective, but only when excluding capital and maintenance fees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal S Panse
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
| | - Vishnu Prasath
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
| | - Patrick L Quinn
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Ravi J Chokshi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yim NH, McCarter J, Haykal T, Aral AM, Yu JZ, Reece E, Winocour S. Robotic Surgery and Hospital Reimbursement. Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37:223-228. [PMID: 38444958 PMCID: PMC10911894 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The field of plastic surgery remains at the forefront of technological and surgical innovation. However, the promising applications of robotics in plastic surgery must be thoughtfully balanced with hospital finances and reimbursements. Robotic systems have been studied extensively across multiple surgical disciplines and across diverse health care systems. The results show that there may be equal or better patient outcomes than alternatives. In an era where fiscal responsibility in health care is a top priority, thoughtful budgeting and spending must be considered and revisited frequently to attain sustainable organizational models that ensure appropriate use of robotic technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas H. Yim
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jacob McCarter
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Tareck Haykal
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Ali M. Aral
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jessie Z. Yu
- Department of Plastic Surgery at The University of Texas, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas
| | - Edward Reece
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sebastian Winocour
- Department of Plastic Surgery at The University of Texas, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ndong A, Diallo AC, Rouhi AD, Diao ML, Yi W, Tendeng JN, Williams NN, Cissé M, Dumon KR, Konaté I. Evolution of laparoscopic surgery in a sub-Saharan African country: a 30-year literature review in Senegal. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10192-w. [PMID: 37308759 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10192-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of laparoscopy has significantly reduced the morbidity associated with the majority of abdominal surgeries. In Senegal, the first studies evaluating this technique were published in the 1980s. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of laparoscopy research in Senegal. METHODS A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was carried out without limit of publication date. The keywords used were "senegal" AND "laparoscop*". Duplicates were removed, and remaining articles were assessed for selection criteria. We included all articles about laparoscopy published in Senegal. The parameters studied in each included article were the place and year of study, average age, sex ratio, assessed indications and results. RESULTS 41 Studies published between 1984 and 2021 met selection criteria. The average age of patients was 33 years (range 4.7-63). The sex ratio was 0.33. The main indications for laparoscopy according to the studies were: benign gastrointestinal disorders in 11 studies (26.8%), abdominal emergencies in 9 studies (22%), gallbladder surgery in 5 studies (12.2%), benign gynecological pathology in 6 studies (14.6%), malignant gynecological pathology in 2 studies (4.9%), diagnostic laparoscopy in 2 studies (4.9%), groin hernia repair in 2 studies (4.9%) and testicular pathology in 1 study (2.4%). Overall mortality was estimated at 0.9% (95% CI 0.6-1.3) and overall morbidity for all complications was estimated at 5% (95% CI 3.4-6.9). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review showed a predominance of the laparoscopy publications from the capital in Dakar with favorable outcomes. This technique should be popularized in the different regions of the country and its indications expanded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdourahmane Ndong
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal.
| | - Adja C Diallo
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal
| | - Armaun D Rouhi
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mohamed L Diao
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal
| | - William Yi
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacques N Tendeng
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal
| | - Noel N Williams
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mamadou Cissé
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal
| | - Kristoffel R Dumon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahima Konaté
- Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint Louis, Senegal
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Morales-Conde S, Balla A, Navarro-Morales L, Moreno-Suero F, Licardie E. Is laparoscopic TAPP the preferred approach for the treatment of inguinal hernia? Technique, indications and future perspectives. Cir Esp 2023; 101 Suppl 1:S11-S18. [PMID: 37951466 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
The repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in General Surgery units. The laparoscopic approach for these hernias will be clearly considered as the gold standard, based on its advantages over the open approach. There are no clear advantages of the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) over the totally preperitoneal approach (TEP), although it has been shown to be more reproducible, presenting a shorter learning curve, although it presents more possibilities of developing trocar site hernias. Laparoscopic TAPP could be superior to TEP in the following indications: incarcerated hernias, emergencies, previous preperitoneal surgery, previous Pfanestiel-type incision, recurrent hernias, inguinoscrotal hernias and obese, being also a better alternative for females. Robotic TAPP is a safe approach with similar results to laparoscopy; however, it is related to an increase in costs and operating time. The value of this technology for the repair of complex hernias (multiple recurrences, inguino-scrotal or after previous preperitoneal surgery) remains to be determined, since they represent a certain challenge for the conventional laparoscopic approach. On the other hand, robotic repair of inguinal hernias may be a way to reduce the learning curve before addressing complex ventral hernias. Finally, artificial intelligence applied to the laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia will undoubtedly have a significant impact in the future especially to determine the best the indications for this approach, on the performance of a safer technique, on the correct selection of meshes and fixation mechanisms, and on learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador Morales-Conde
- Unidad de Innovación de Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva, Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo del Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Andrea Balla
- Unidad de Innovación de Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva, Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo del Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Laura Navarro-Morales
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Francisco Moreno-Suero
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eugenio Licardie
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Infanta Elena, Huelva, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trovato CM, Capriati T, Bolasco G, Brusco C, Santariga E, Laureti F, Campana C, Papa V, Mazzoli B, Corrado S, Tambucci R, Maggiore G, Diamanti A. Enteral formula compared to Nissen-Fundoplication: Data from a retrospective analysis on tolerance, utility, applicability, and safeness in children with neurological diseases. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1093218. [PMID: 36969827 PMCID: PMC10034170 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1093218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives and studyApproximately 46–90% of children with neurological disorders (NDs) suffer from gastrointestinal diseases, such as gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), constipation, or malnutrition. Therefore, enteral feeding is often necessary to achieve nutritional requirements. The treatment of GERD could be based on pharmacological therapy, nutritional treatment (changing the type of formula), or surgical treatment (Nissen Fundoplication, NF). The aim of this study was to describe and compare resource consumption between NE based on different formulas and NF in patients with ND.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on all children with neurological damage (age: 29 days−17 years) treated from January 2009 to January 2019 due to nutritional problems and food and/or gastrointestinal intolerances. For all patients, demographic and anthropometric characteristics, symptoms, type of nutrition (formula and enteral access), and number and type of outpatient or emergency room visits were collected. Patients with <24 months of age at the closing of the database and with <24 months of follow-up were excluded.ResultsOut of 376 children, 309 children (M: 158; median age: 4 IQR 1–10) were enrolled, among which, 65 patients (NF group M: 33; median age: 5.3 IQR 1.8–10.7) underwent NF. Vomit, GERD, and dysphagia were more represented in the NF group (p < 0.05). Our analysis shows that the NF group seems to present a lower number of hospitalization and a lower number of visits for non-GI disorders, but a higher number of visits for GI disorders compared to non-NF. In the NF group, a higher prevalence of the use of amino-acid-based formula and free diet is observed, with a trend for the lower prevalence of casein-based or whey+casein-based formula (Fisher test p = 0.072). The median cost of a patient enrolled in the database is € 19,515 ± 540 ($ 20,742.32 ± 573.96) per year, with no significant difference between the two groups. Regarding formula, at baseline, 76 children consumed a free diet, 24 a casein-based formula, 139 a whey+casein-based formula, 46 a whey-based formula, and 24 an amino-acid-based formula.ConclusionsIn conclusion, compared to EN, NF may not improve the clinical aspect and related costs in children with NDs. Considering the psychological and QoL burden for patients, in a “step-up” strategy, EN could be proposed as an efficient alternative to NF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Maria Trovato
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Capriati
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bolasco
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Brusco
- Administrative Management, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Santariga
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Laureti
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Campana
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Papa
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Bianca Mazzoli
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Corrado
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Renato Tambucci
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maggiore
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Diamanti
- Gastroenterology and Nutritional Rehabilitation Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Antonella Diamanti
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen W, Zhang X, Jiang J, Ye Y, Zhai Z, Hu W, Li X, Chen Y, Chen Y, Hong Y, Jia L, Bai X, Liang T. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior region: a retrospective study of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5. [PMID: 36890414 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resection of the posterosuperior region is considered a challenging procedure due to poor exposure and difficult bleeding control. A robotic approach is supposed to be advantageous in posterosuperior segmentectomy. Its benefits over laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) remain undetermined. This study compared robotic liver resection (RLR) and LLR in the posterosuperior region performed by a single surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive RLR and LLR performed by a single surgeon between December 2020 and March 2022. Patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed between both groups. RESULTS The analysis included 48 RLR and 57 LLR procedures in the posterosuperior region. After PSM analysis, 41 cases of both groups were retained. In pre-PSM cohort, the operative time in the RLR group was significantly shorter than in the LLR group (160 vs. 208 min, P = 0.001), especially in radical resection of malignant tumors (176 vs. 231 min, P = 0.004). The total Pringle maneuver duration was also markedly shorter (40 vs. 51 min, P = 0.047), and the estimated blood loss in the RLR group was lower (92 vs. 150 mL, P = 0.005). The postoperative hospital stay (POHS) in the RLR group was significantly shorter (5.4 vs. 7.5 days, P = 0.048). In PSM cohort, operative time in the RLR group was also significantly shorter (163 vs. 193 min, P = 0.036), and the estimated blood loss was lower (92 vs. 144 mL, P = 0.024). However, the total Pringle maneuver duration and POHS showed no significant difference. The complications were similar between two groups in both pre-PSM and PSM cohorts. CONCLUSION RLR in the posterosuperior region was as safe and feasible as LLR. RLR was associated with reduced operative time and blood loss than LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Jincai Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yufu Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Zhenglong Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Wendi Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yiwen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yifan Hong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Lan Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Hangzhou, China
- The Innovation Center for the Study of Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Introducing the E100: will the improvement make a significant difference? Financial analysis based on sleeve gastrectomy. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01550-w. [PMID: 36881343 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01550-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has been shown to offer significant benefits for both patients and surgeons. However, the high cost of the equipment remains a major barrier to its widespread adoption in the medical field. To ensure cost-effectiveness of these procedures, it is important to implement strategies that can help reduce the costs involved. One potential strategy to reduce costs is to compare the performance of different generators used in these procedures. In this study, we compared the performance of two generators: the E100 (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) and the ERBE VIO dV 2.0 (Elektromedizin GmbH). The analysis focused on several key metrics, including the number of times the generators were activated, the average time per seal, total sealing time, and console time. The financial impact of transitioning to the E100 was also evaluated based on annual volume. We analyzed a total of 1457 sleeve gastrectomies, with 746 performed using the ERBE generator and 711 performed using the E100. There were no significant differences in preoperative BMI or bleeding complication rates between the two groups. The average activation of the generator per case was similar in both groups. However, the sealing time was 42.3% lower, and the average console time was 8 min shorter in cases where the E100 was used. Based on our financial analysis, transitioning to the E100 generator would result in cost savings of approximately $33-$34 K per year. This suggests that introducing the new generator is a successful strategy for reducing costs associated with robotic-assisted procedures.
Collapse
|
26
|
¿Es preferible el TAPP por vía laparoscópica para el tratamiento de la hernia inguinal? Técnica, indicaciones y expectativas de futuro. Cir Esp 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
27
|
Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Roblesgil-Medrano A, Tellez-Giron VC, Torres-Martinez M, Galindo-Garza CA, Estrada-Mendizabal RJ, Alanis-Garza C, Gonzalez-Bonilla EA, Flores-Villalba E. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105:7-13. [PMID: 35616429 PMCID: PMC9773273 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Renal transplantation remains the definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease. Currently employed minimally invasive techniques include robotic-assisted laparoscopy and laparoscopy. This study aims to determine whether either method provides an advantage. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Data were analysed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS A total of 12 studies were included. Operative time and operative bleeding were similar between both approaches, with a mean difference (MD) of 16min (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.06, 37.38; p = 0.11) and 10.44ml (95% CI -43.89, 64.78; p = 0.71), respectively. Robotics had longer warm ischemia time (MD 1.14min; 95% CI 0.65, 1.63; p = 0.00001) but reduced length of stay (LOS) (MD -0.23days; 95% CI -0.45, -0.01; p = 0.04) and pain (MD -1.26 VAS; 95% CI -1.77, 0.75). Similar complication and conversion rates were seen among groups. CONCLUSIONS Robotic approaches provide a viable alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Operative time, bleeding volumes, complications and conversion rates are similar between both techniques; apparent robotic advantages on LOS and Pain need to be better analysed by future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Roblesgil-Medrano
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | - VC Tellez-Giron
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | - M Torres-Martinez
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | - CA Galindo-Garza
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | | | - C Alanis-Garza
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | - EA Gonzalez-Bonilla
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, México
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hansen DL, Christophersen C, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Implementation of robot-assisted groin hernia repair diminishes the prospects of young surgeons' training: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Hernia 2022; 26:1653-1658. [PMID: 36201067 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02691-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is becoming more popular in recent years but may remove operations from surgical trainees. We aimed to investigate the educational level of the surgeons who performed robot-assisted groin hernia repair and the rate of supervision and compare this to open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair. METHODS This register-based study was reported according to the RECORD statement and used linked data from the Danish Hernia Database and the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register. We included surgeons that performed robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and/or open groin hernia repairs performed between January 1, 2015, and June 15, 2021 in Denmark. RESULTS A total of 916 surgeons performing 43,856 groin hernia repairs were included in this study. Surgical specialists performed 98% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs, 89% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001), and 54% of the Lichtenstein repairs (p < 0.0001). Only 5% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs were supervised compared with 11% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001) and 28% of the open repairs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Almost all groin hernia repairs performed with the robot-assisted technique were performed by surgeons specialized in general surgery. The proportions of surgeons specialized in surgery were higher for robot-assisted operations compared with laparoscopic or open groin hernia surgery. Thus, our data suggest a lack of involvement of surgeons in training, and this diminishes the educational potential in the pool of groin hernia operations by the use of robot-assisted repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Hansen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - C Christophersen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - S Fonnes
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Munshower E, Ren E, Bauerle WB, Ruland J, Stoltzfus J, McDonald M, Baillie DR, Chaar ME. Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:557-564. [PMID: 35939166 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01434-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopy is currently the standard approach for minimally invasive general surgery procedures. However, robotic surgery is now increasingly being used in general surgery. Robotic surgery provides several advantages such as 3D-visualization, articulated instruments, improved ergonomics, and increased dexterity, but is also associated with an increased overall cost which limits its widespread use. In our institution, the robotic assisted approach is frequently used for the performance of general surgery cases including inguinal hernias, cholecystectomies and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cost between a robotic and laparoscopic approach for the above-mentioned cases. With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs, cholecystectomies and PEH repairs between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who had a concomitant procedure, a revisional surgery, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair were excluded from the study. Cost analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach. Statistical significance was denoted by p < 0.05. There were no differences among the different groups in relation to age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI. The overall cost of the robotic (R-) approach compared to a laparoscopic (L-) approach was significantly lower for cholecystectomy ($3,199.96 vs $4019.89, p < 0.05). For inguinal hernia repairs and PEH repairs without mesh, we found no significant difference in overall costs between the R- and L- approach (R- $3835.06 vs L- $3783.50, p = 0.69) and (R- $6852.41 vs L- $6819.69, p = 0.97), respectively. However, the overall cost of PEH with mesh was significantly higher for the R- group compared to the L- group (R- $7,511.09 vs L- $6,443.32, p < 0.05). Based on our institutional cost data, use of a robotic approach when performing certain general surgery cases does not seem to be cost prohibitive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Munshower
- Temple/St. Luke's School of Medicine, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Emily Ren
- Temple/St. Luke's School of Medicine, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Wayne B Bauerle
- Department of Research and Innovation, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Janice Ruland
- Cost Accounting Department, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Jill Stoltzfus
- Department of Research and Innovation, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Marian McDonald
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Daniel R Baillie
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Maher El Chaar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery, St. Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Robotic Foregut Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration: Increasing Prevalence, Decreasing Operative Time, and Improving Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:149-156. [PMID: 35839388 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, robotic surgery incurs longer operative times, higher costs, and nonsuperior outcomes compared with laparoscopic surgery. However, in areas of limited visibility and decreased accessibility such as the gastroesophageal junction, robotic platforms may improve visualization and facilitate dissection. This study compares 30-day outcomes between robotic-assisted foregut surgery (RAF) and laparoscopic-assisted foregut surgery in the Veterans Health Administration. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective review of the Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted foregut surgery and RAF were identified using CPT codes 43280, 43281, 43282, and robotic modifier S2900. Multivariable logistic regression and multivariable generalized linear models were used to analyze the independent association between surgical approach and outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 9,355 veterans underwent minimally invasive fundoplication from 2008 to 2019. RAF was used in 5,392 cases (57.6%): 1.63% of cases in 2008 to 83.41% of cases in 2019. After adjusting for confounding covariates, relative to laparoscopic-assisted foregut surgery, RAF was significantly associated with decreased adjusted odds of pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44, p < 0.001), acute renal failure (aOR 0.14, p = 0.046), venous thromboembolism (aOR 0.44, p = 0.009) and increased odds of infectious complications (aOR 1.60, p = 0.017). RAF was associated with an adjusted mean ± SD of 29 ± 2-minute shorter operative time (332 minutes vs 361 minutes; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Veterans undergoing RAF ascertained shorter operative times and reduced complications vs laparoscopy. As surgeons use the robotic platform, clinical outcomes and operative times continue to improve, particularly in operations where extra articulation in confined spaces is required.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hansen DL, Gram-Hanssen A, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:291-301. [PMID: 35788971 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01440-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Lip Hansen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Anders Gram-Hanssen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Siv Fonnes
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bosi HR, Rombaldi MC, Zaniratti T, Castilhos FO, Sbaraini M, Grossi JV, Pretto GG, Cavazzola LT. Does single‐site robotic surgery makes sense for gallbladder surgery? Int J Med Robot 2022; 18:e2363. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique Rasia Bosi
- Department of Surgery Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
| | | | - Thamyres Zaniratti
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
| | | | - Mariana Sbaraini
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
| | | | - Guilherme Gonçalves Pretto
- Department of Surgery Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
- Department of Surgery Hospital Moinhos de Vento Porto Alegre Brazil
| | - Leandro Totti Cavazzola
- Department of Surgery Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
- Department of Surgery Hospital Moinhos de Vento Porto Alegre Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ayabe RI, Azimuddin A, Tran Cao HS. Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1779-1787. [PMID: 35488913 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02523-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resection is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay. However, the added benefit of the robotic platform over conventional laparoscopy is a matter of ongoing investigation. PURPOSE The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an up-to-date and balanced evaluation of the benefits and shortcomings of robotic liver surgery for the modern hepatobiliary surgeon. CONCLUSIONS Advantages of a robotic approach to liver resection include a shortened learning curve, the ability to complete more extensive or complex minimally invasive operations, and integrated fluorescence guidance. However, the robotic platform remains limited by a paucity of parenchymal transection devices, complete lack of haptic feedback, and added operating time associated with docking and instrument exchange. Like laparoscopic hepatectomy, robotic hepatectomy may provide patients with more rapid recovery and a shorter hospital stay, which can help offset the substantial costs of robot acquisition and maintenance. The oncologic outcomes of robotic hepatectomy appear to be equivalent to laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed I Ayabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ahad Azimuddin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Roblesgil-Medrano A, Torres-Martinez M, Alanis-Garza C, Estrada-Mendizabal RJ, Gonzalez-Bonilla EA, Flores-Villalba E, Olvera-Posada D. Single-port versus multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the da Vinci SP platform. Prostate 2022; 82:405-414. [PMID: 34985775 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men; robotic prostatectomy has cemented itself as part of the standard of care. Since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018, the SP console's application has been increasingly studied and compared with the multiport (MP) robotic approach. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration CRD42021228744, a systematic review was performed in April 2021 on single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies (SP-RARPs) compared to MP. Outcomes of interest were operative time, bleeding, complications, analgesic use, and postoperative continence, and erectile function. Data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS Seven studies were included, of which six studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative synthesis, totalling 1068 patients, out of which 324 underwent SP-RARP and 744 underwent MP-RARP. No differences were found in baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, prostatic-specific antigen, or stage. No differences in blood loss-15.77 mL [-42.44, 10.89], p = 0.25, operative time 3.93 min [-4.12, 11.98], p = 0.34, or positive surgical margins, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.78 [0.55, 1.10], p = 0.15-were found. Length of stay was significantly shorter in SP -0.94 days [-1.56, -0.33], p = 0.003, with no differences in complication rates, with an OR of 1.29 [0.78, 2.14], p = 0.32, continence rates, with an OR of 1.29 [0.90, 1.83], p = 0.16, erectile function, with an OR of 0.86 [0.52, 1.40], p = 0.54, or biochemical recurrence. Qualitative evidence suggests decreased opioid consumption. CONCLUSION SP-RARPs are feasible alternatives to the traditional MP with possible benefits in pain management and length of stay. Future high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cordelia Alanis-Garza
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, N.L., México
| | | | | | - Eduardo Flores-Villalba
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, N.L., México
| | - Daniel Olvera-Posada
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, N.L., México
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lai W, Yang J, Xu N, Chen JH, Yang C, Yao HH. Surgical strategies for Mirizzi syndrome: A ten-year single center experience. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:107-119. [PMID: 35317542 PMCID: PMC8908338 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mirizzi syndrome (MS) remains a challenging biliary disease, and its low rate of preoperative diagnosis should be resolved. Moreover, technological advances have not resulted in decisive improvements in the surgical treatment of MS. Complex bile duct lesions due to MS make surgery difficult, especially when the laparoscopic approach is adopted. The safety and long-term effect of MS treatment need to be guaranteed in terms of preoperative diagnosis and surgical strategy.
AIM To analyze preoperative diagnostic methods and the safety, effectiveness, prognosis and related factors of surgical strategies for different types of MS.
METHODS The clinical data of MS patients who received surgical treatment from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with malignancies, choledochojejunal fistula, lack of data and lost to follow-up were excluded. According to preoperative imaging examination records and documented intraoperative findings, the clinical types of MS were determined using the Csendes classification. The safety, effectiveness and long-term prognosis of surgical treatment in different types of MS, and their interactions with the clinical characteristics of patients were summarized.
RESULTS Sixty-six patients with MS were included (34 males and 32 females). Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) showed specific imaging features of MS in 58 cases (87.9%), which was superior to ultrasound scan (USS) in the diagnosis of MS and more sensitive to subtle biliary lesions than USS. The overall laparoscopic surgery completion rate was 53.03% (35/66), where the completion rates of MS type I, II and III were 69.05% (29/42), 42.86% (6/14) and zero (0/10), respectively. Thirty-one patients (46.97%) underwent laparotomy or conversion to laparotomy including 11 cases of iatrogenic bile duct injury which occurred in type I patients, and 25 of these patients underwent bile duct exploration, repair and T-tube drainage. In addition, 25 patients underwent intraoperative choledochoscopy and T-tube cholangiography. Overall, 21 cases (31.8%) were repaired by simple suturing, and 14 cases (21.2%) were repaired using the remaining gallbladder wall patch in the subtotal cholecystectomy. The ascendant of the Csendes classification types led to an increase in surgical complexity reflected by increased operation time, bleeding volume and cost. Gender, acute abdominal pain and measurable stone size had no effect on Csendes type of MS or final surgical approach. Age had no effect on the classification of MS, but it influenced the final surgical approach, hospital stay and cost. A total of 66 patients obtained a relatively high preoperative diagnostic rate and underwent surgery safely without serious complications, and no mortality was observed during the follow-up period of 36.5 ± 26.5 mo (range 13-76, median 22 mo).
CONCLUSION MRI/MRCP can improve the preoperative diagnosis of MS. The Csendes classification can reflect the difficulty of treatment. The surgical strategies including laparoscopic surgery for MS should be formulated based on full evaluation and selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Lai
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Nan Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jun-Hua Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Chen Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hui-Hua Yao
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery, Chengdu First People’s Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital), Chengdu 610044, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kao HY, Yang YC, Hung YH, Wu YJ. When Does Da Vanci Robotic Surgical Systems Come Into Play? Front Public Health 2022; 10:828542. [PMID: 35174126 PMCID: PMC8841676 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.828542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The emergent of medical science and technology has risen the minimally invasive surgery. Da Vinci Robotic Surgical Systems (RSS) is the trend at present. Compared with the past surgical methods, many studies related to RSS tend to explore postoperative outcomes and quality of life or compare the advantages and disadvantages than the other surgery. Few studies to understand the patients' willing who use RSS. This study mainly explores the patients' willingness and adopts the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the theoretical foundation, and appended the trust concept to discuss. The study was a retrospective study and used a structured questionnaire to conduct a survey. The subjects included the patients with single-disease who had used RSS in a Medical Center of Southern Taiwan but excluded the patients with multiple disorder. This study conducted SPSS 22.0 and Smart PLS 2.0 software for statistical analysis, which included descriptive statistical analysis and applied Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis to test the research model and to examine the established hypotheses. A total of 136 cases were collected in this study. Study validation was tested. Trust positively affects Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.550) and Perceived Ease of Use (β = 0.300). Perceived Ease of Use positively affects Perceived Usefulness (β = 0.188). Perceived Usefulness positively affects Attitude Toward Using (β = 0.589. Attitude Toward Using positively affects Behavioral Intention (β = 0.446. The relationship between perceived Ease of Use and Attitude toward Using was insignificant. Additionally, the relationship between Perceived Usefulness and Behavioral Intention was insignificant. In the research results, we found that patients are mostly in the middle and high age groups, and if the patient himself feels that RSS is extremely helpful to his illness, the intensity of his choice of intention will be high. In comparison, the information related to RSS has been clearly known, it does not directly affect the selection intention. According to age, most of the choices of RSS is based on safety and risk considerations, and it is beneficial to the patient himself, but RSS is also more expensive. We recommended that the government consider ββ reimbursing the RSS process in health insurance programs to meet the needs and expectations of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Yun Kao
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chen Yang
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Han Hung
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Yu-Han Hung
| | - Yenchun Jim Wu
- College of Humanities and Arts, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Yenchun Jim Wu
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hansen DL, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Spin is present in the majority of articles evaluating robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2271-2278. [PMID: 35024934 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08990-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of scientific articles published each year is increasing, resulting in greater competition to get work published. Spin is defined as specific reporting strategies used to distort the readers' interpretation of results so that they are viewed more favorable. However, prevalence of spin in studies comparing robot-assisted groin hernia repair with traditional methods is unknown. OBJECTIVES/AIM To determine the frequency and extent of spin in studies assessing robot-assisted groin hernia repair. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines, and a protocol was registered at PROSPERO before data extraction. Database search included PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. RESULTS Of 35 included studies, spin was present in 57%. Within these, 95% had spin present in the abstract and 80% in the conclusion of the article. There was no association between study size and spin (p > 0.05). However, presence of spin in studies positively minded towards robot-assisted hernia repair was higher (p < 0.001) compared with those against or being neutral in their view of the procedure. Furthermore, being funded by or receiving grants from Intuitive Surgical were associated with a higher prevalence of spin (p < 0.05) compared with those who were not. CONCLUSION Spin was found to be common in articles reporting on robot-assisted groin hernia repair, and presence of spin was higher in studies funded by or receiving grants from the robot company. This suggests that readers should be cautious when reading similar literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danni Lip Hansen
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Siv Fonnes
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jacob Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimisation, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Elakkad MS, ElBakry T, Bouchiba N, Halfaoui M, ElOsta A, Qabbani A, Singh R, Aboumarzouk OM. Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Obesity, Where Do We Stand? Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care 2022. [DOI: 10.1089/bari.2021.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tamer ElBakry
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nizar Bouchiba
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mourad Halfaoui
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Amjad Qabbani
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Rajvir Singh
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Omar M. Aboumarzouk
- Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Saito T, Fukami Y, Kurahashi S, Yasui K, Uchino T, Matsumura T, Osawa T, Komatsu S, Kaneko K, Sano T. Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today 2021; 52:1395-1404. [PMID: 34860300 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02413-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
With more than 5500 da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) installed worldwide, the robotic approach for general surgery, including for inguinal hernia repair, is gaining popularity in the USA. However, in many countries outside the USA, robotic surgery is performed at only a few advanced institutions; therefore, its advantages over the open or laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia repair are unclear. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, but there is still no firm evidence to support the superiority of robotic surgery for this procedure or its long-term clinical outcomes. Robotic surgery has the potential to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery through appropriate utilization of technological advantages, such as wristed instruments, tremor filtering, and high-resolution 3D images. The potential benefits of robotic inguinal hernia repair are lower rates of complications or recurrence than open and laparoscopic surgery, with less postoperative pain, and a rapid learning curve for surgeons. In this review, we summarize the current status and future prospects of robotic inguinal hernia repair and discuss the issues associated with this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Saito
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
| | - Yasuyuki Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Shintaro Kurahashi
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Kohei Yasui
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Tairin Uchino
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Matsumura
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Takaaki Osawa
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Shunichiro Komatsu
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Kenitiro Kaneko
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Sano
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Karimata-Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Complications Following Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Are Higher Compared to Laparoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:3049-3055. [PMID: 33852128 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05005-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robotic platforms in surgery is becoming increasingly common in both practice and residency training. In this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between robotic platforms and traditional laparoscopy in paraesophageal hernia repair. METHODS A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period of 2010-2015. Adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic paraesophageal hernia repairs were included. Weighted multivariable random intercept linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of robotic surgery on patient outcomes. RESULTS A total of 168,329 patients were included in the study. The overall adjusted rate of complications was significantly higher in patients who underwent robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair compared to laparoscopic PEH OR (95% CI) = 1.17 (1.07, 1.27). Specifically, respiratory failure OR (95% CI) = 1.68 (1.37, 2.05) and esophageal perforation OR (95% CI) = 2.19 (1.42, 3.93) were higher in robotic PEH patients. A subset analysis was performed looking at high-volume centers (>20 operations per year), and, although the risk of complications was lower in the high volume centers compared to intermediate volume centers, complication rates were still significantly higher in the robotic surgery group compared to laparoscopic. Overall charges per surgery were significantly higher in the robotic group. CONCLUSION Robotic PEH repair is associated with significantly more complications compared to laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair even in high-volume centers.
Collapse
|
41
|
Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:775-781. [PMID: 34609697 PMCID: PMC9314304 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to review the latest evidence on the robotic approach (RHR) for inguinal hernia repair comparing the pooled outcome of this technique with those of the standard laparoscopic procedure (LHR). A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for studies published between 2010 and 2021 concerning the comparison between RHR versus LHR. After screening 582 articles, 9 articles with a total of 64,426 patients (7589 RHRs) were eligible for inclusion. Among preoperative variables, a pooled higher ratio of ASA > 2 patients was found in the robotic group (12.4 vs 8.6%, p < 0.001). Unilateral hernia repair was more common in the laparoscopic group (79.9 vs 68.1, p < 0.001). Overall, operative time was longer in the robotic group (160 vs 90 min, p < 0.001); this was confirmed also in the sub-analysis on unilateral procedures (88 vs 68 min, p = 0.040). The operative time for robotic bilateral repair was similar to the laparoscopic one (111 vs 100, p = 0.797). Conversion to open surgery was 0% in the robotic group. The pooled rate of chronic pain and postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The standardized mean difference MD of the costs between LHR versus RHR was − 3270$ (95% CI – 4757 to − 1782, p < 0.001). In conclusion, laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair have similar safety parameters and postoperative outcomes. Robotic approach may require longer operative time if the unilateral repair is performed. Costs are higher in the robotic group.
Collapse
|
42
|
Chohatakar HA, Ramesh V, Paramashivaiah N, Lakshman K. Minimally Invasive Surgery: Are We Doing It Right? Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02612-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
43
|
Kulaylat AN, Richards H, Yada K, Coyle D, Shelby R, Onwuka AJ, Aldrink JH, Diefenbach KA, Michalsky MP. Comparative analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56:1876-1880. [PMID: 33276970 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increased utilization of robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric population during the past decade, reports of comparative analysis between robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery are lacking. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes between pediatric robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS A single institution retrospective analysis of 299 patients undergoing either RC or LC, between January 2015 and December 2018 was performed. Demographic data as well as clinical characteristics and related outcomes were abstracted and compared using univariate analysis. Related hospital costs were estimated using a charge to cost methodology. RESULTS The median age of the cohort was 15.5 years (IQR 14.0-17.0); 76% females and 70% white, with 74% (n = 220) undergoing LC and 26% (n = 79) undergoing RC. The majority of RC were performed using single-site technique and RC proportion increased with time (10% in 2015 vs. 41% in 2018, p<0.001). The majority of RC were more commonly attributed to patients with nonacute indications for cholecystectomy compared to acute clinical indications (87% vs. 13%). Median operative time was 98 min vs. 79 min for RC and LC respectively (p<0.001). Median postoperative LOS was similar between groups (22 h). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication, in-hospital opioid utilization and 30-day readmissions. Average total hospital costs for RC were $15,519 compared to $11,197 for LC. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is feasible with similar outcomes compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, it is associated with longer operative times and higher costs. The single-site RC technique may provide a potential cosmetic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afif N Kulaylat
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, United States.
| | - Holden Richards
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Keigo Yada
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Rita Shelby
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Amanda J Onwuka
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Karen A Diefenbach
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Marc P Michalsky
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11090900. [PMID: 34575677 PMCID: PMC8472541 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is a complex and challenging procedure due to technical and anatomical issues which could impair postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes, especially in a defined subgroup of patients. The results from recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery are still conflicting and trans-anal bottom-up approaches have recently been developed. Robotic surgery represents the latest consistent innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery that may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy thanks to an enhanced dexterity, especially in deep narrow operative fields such as the pelvis. Results from population-based multicenter studies have shown the potential advantages of robotic surgery when compared to its laparoscopic counterpart in terms of reduced conversions, complication rates and length of stay. Costs, often advocated as one of the main drawbacks of robotic surgery, should be thoroughly evaluated including both the direct and indirect costs, with the latter having the potential of counterbalancing the excess of expenditure directly related to the purchase and maintenance of robotic equipment. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required to better delineate the advantages of the robotic platform, especially in the subset of most complex and technically challenging patients from both an anatomical and oncological standpoint.
Collapse
|
45
|
Braun D, Weik D, Elsner S, Hunger S, Werner M, Drossel WG. Position Control and Force Estimation Method for Surgical Forceps Using SMA Actuators and Sensors. MATERIALS 2021; 14:ma14175111. [PMID: 34501197 PMCID: PMC8434184 DOI: 10.3390/ma14175111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly used in many medical operations because of the benefits for the patients. However, for the surgeons, accessing the situs through a small incision or natural orifice comes with a reduction of the degrees of freedom of the instrument. Due to friction of the mechanical coupling, the haptic feedback lacks sensitivity that could lead to damage of the tissue. The approach of this work to overcome these problems is to develop a control concept for position control and force estimation with shape memory alloys (SMA) which could offer haptic feedback in a novel handheld instrument. The concept aims to bridge the gap between manually actuated laparoscopic instruments and surgical robots. Nickel-titanium shape memory alloys are used for actuation because of their high specific energy density. The work includes the manufacturing of a functional model as a proof of concept comprising the development of a suitable forceps mechanism and electronic circuit for position control and gripping force measurement, as well as designing an ergonomic user interface with haptic force feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Braun
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | - David Weik
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
| | - Sophia Elsner
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
| | - Sandra Hunger
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
| | - Michael Werner
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
| | - Welf-Guntram Drossel
- Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Department of Medical Engineering, Nöthnitzer Str. 44, 01187 Dresden, Germany; (D.W.); (S.E.); (S.H.); (M.W.); (W.-G.D.)
- Professorship for Adaptronics and Lightweight Design in Production, Chemnitz University of Technology, Straße der Nationen 62, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Slater BJ, Dirks RC, McKinley SK, Ansari MT, Kohn GP, Thosani N, Qumseya B, Billmeier S, Daly S, Crawford C, P Ehlers A, Hollands C, Palazzo F, Rodriguez N, Train A, Wassenaar E, Walsh D, Pryor AD, Stefanidis D. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Surg Endosc 2021; 35:4903-4917. [PMID: 34279710 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08625-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is an extremely common condition with several medical and surgical treatment options. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of GERD with an emphasis on evaluating different surgical techniques. METHODS Literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical treatment of GERD in both adults and children: surgical vs. medical treatment, robotic vs. laparoscopic fundoplication, partial vs. complete fundoplication, and division vs. preservation of short gastric vessels in adults or maximal versus minimal dissection in pediatric patients. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS The panel provided seven recommendations for adults and children with GERD. All recommendations were conditional due to very low, low, or moderate certainty of evidence. The panel conditionally recommended surgical treatment over medical management for adults with chronic or chronic refractory GERD. There was insufficient evidence for the panel to make a recommendation regarding surgical versus medical treatment in children. The panel suggested that once the decision to pursue surgical therapy is made, adults and children with GERD may be treated with either a robotic or a laparoscopic approach, and either partial or complete fundoplication based on surgeon-patient shared decision-making and patient values. In adults, the panel suggested either division or non-division of the short gastric vessels is appropriate, and that children should undergo minimal dissection during fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to surgical decision-making in the treatment of GERD and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and patient values to optimize patient outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs may improve future versions of guidelines for the treatment of GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany J Slater
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4062, Chicago, IL, 606037, USA.
| | - Rebecca C Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sophia K McKinley
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Upper GI Surgical Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bashar Qumseya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl, USA
| | - Sarah Billmeier
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
| | - Catherine Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge Massachusetts and Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, MA, USA
| | - Anne P Ehlers
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Celeste Hollands
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Texas, USA
| | - Francesco Palazzo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Noe Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Florida, USA
| | - Arianne Train
- Department of Surgery, Winn Army Community Hospital, Fort Stewart, GA, USA
| | - Eelco Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Zutphen, Netherlands
| | - Danielle Walsh
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Dimitrios Stefanidis
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kulshrestha S, Janjua HM, Bunn C, Rogers M, DuCoin C, Abdelsattar ZM, Luchette FA, Kuo PC, Baker MS. State-Level Examination of Clinical Outcomes and Costs for Robotic and Laparoscopic Approach to Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 233:9-19.e2. [PMID: 34015455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published studies evaluating the effect of robotic assistance on clinical outcomes and costs of care in diaphragmatic hernia repair (DHR) have been limited. STUDY DESIGN The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases for Florida were queried to identify patients undergoing transabdominal DHR between 2011 and 2018 and associated inpatient and outpatient encounters within 12 months after the index operation. Patients undergoing robotic DHR were 1:1:1 propensity score-matched for age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity score, case priority, payer, and facility volume with patients undergoing open and laparoscopic DHR. RESULTS There were 5,962 patients (67.3%) who underwent laparoscopic DHR, 1,520 (17.2%) who underwent open DHR, and 1,376 (15.5%) who underwent robotic DHR. On comparison of matched cohorts, median index length of stay (3 days; interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 5 days vs 2 days; IQR 1 to 4 days; p < 0.001) and index hospitalization costs ($17,236; IQR $13,231 to $22,183 vs $12,087; IQR $8,881 to $17,439; p < 0.001) for robotic DHR were greater than for laparoscopic DHR. Median length of stay for open DHR (6 days; IQR 4 to 10 days) was longer than that for both laparoscopic and robotic DHR. Median index hospitalization costs for open DHR ($16,470; IQR $11,152 to $23,768) were greater than those for laparoscopic DHR, but less than those for robotic DHR. There were no significant differences between cohorts in the overall rate of post-index care. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic DHR is the most cost-effective approach to DHR. Robotic assistance provides clinical outcomes comparable with laparoscopic DHR, but is associated with increased index cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujay Kulshrestha
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.
| | - Haroon M Janjua
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; OnetoMap Analytics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Corinne Bunn
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Burn and Shock Trauma Research Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael Rogers
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Zaid M Abdelsattar
- Depatment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL
| | - Fred A Luchette
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL
| | - Paul C Kuo
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; OnetoMap Analytics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Marshall S Baker
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bellorin O, Senturk JC, Cruz MV, Alt R, Dakin G, Afaneh C. A cost analysis of two- versus three-instrument robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with mesh: time is money. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:377-382. [PMID: 33997917 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01250-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Equipment expenses and operating times can lead to higher costs with robotic surgery. We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2- vs. 3-instrument (2i vs. 3i) approach to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. We conducted a retrospective study of 172 patients, with 86 patients in each group. Procedure cost, operative time, morbidity, length of stay, readmission rate, and hernia recurrence at 90 days were compared. Statistical significance was assigned to p < 0.05. No significant differences in preoperative variables nor in postoperative outcomes were identified. Mean operative time was 6 min longer in the 2i group and this approach cost $300 less. The 2i approach was cost-effective for operating room (OR) costs of less than $50 per minute. Surgeon efficiency and OR dollar-per-minute value influence the potential for cost savings with fewer instruments in robotic herniorrhaphy. There is no difference in outcomes when fewer instruments are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Bellorin
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - James C Senturk
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Mariana Vigiola Cruz
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Rachel Alt
- Department of Surgery, Valley Medical Group, Ridgewood, NJ, 07450, USA
| | - Gregory Dakin
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Cheguevara Afaneh
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine real-life patterns of care and patient outcomes associated with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in New York State (NYS). BACKGROUND Although robotic assistance may offer some technological advantages, RACs are associated with higher procedural costs and longer operating times compared to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs). Evidence on long-term patient outcomes after RAC from large population-based datasets remains limited and inconsistent. METHODS Using NYS inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2009-2017), we conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine patterns of utilization, complications, and secondary procedures following cholecystectomies. RESULTS Among 299,306 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in NYS between 2009 and 2017, one thousand one hundred eighteen (0.4%) were robot-assisted. Compared to those undergoing LC, RAC patients were older, travelled further for surgery, and were more likely to have public insurance and preoperative comorbidities. RAC versus LC patients were more significantly likely to have conversions to open procedure (4.9% vs 2.8%), bile duct injuries (1.3% vs 0.4%), and major reconstructive interventions (0.6% vs 0.1%), longer median length of stay (3 vs 1 day), readmissions (7.3% vs 4.4%), and higher 12-month post-index surgery hospital charges (P < 0.01 for all estimates). Other postoperative complications decreased over time for LC but remained unchanged for RAC patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving RAC in NYS experienced higher rates of complications compared to LC patients. Addressing patient-, surgeon-, and system-level factors associated with intra/postoperative complications and applying recently promulgated safe cholecystectomy strategies coupled with advanced imaging modalities like fluorescence cholangiography to RAC may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
50
|
Stewart C, Wong P, Warner S, Raoof M, Singh G, Fong Y, Melstrom L. Robotic minor hepatectomy: optimizing outcomes and cost of care. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:700-706. [PMID: 32988754 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advantages of robotic liver surgery are strongest for minor resections, where incision size drives recovery time, but cost remains a concern. We hypothesized that patients who underwent robotic minor liver resections would have superior peri-operative outcomes resulting in decreased cost. METHODS We queried the medical record and cost data for patients who underwent open or robotic minor (1-2 segment) liver resection from 1/2016-8/2019. Financial data were normalized to Medicare reimbursements. RESULTS There were 87 patients who underwent minor liver resections (robotic n = 46, open n = 41). Specimen size (173 ± 203 vs 257 ± 481 cm3), surgical duration (233 ± 87 vs 227 ± 83 min), estimated blood loss (187 ± 236 vs 194 ± 165 mL), and margin status (89% vs 93% R0) were similar for robotic and open resections respectively, yet complications (3/46, 7% vs 10/41, 24%, p = 0.02) and length of stay (2.2 ± 2.2 vs 6.2 ± 2.9, p < 0.001) were significantly lower for patients who underwent robotic resection. These factors contributed to minor robotic liver resections costing $534 less than open resections ($3597 ± 1823 vs $4131 ± 1532, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing robotic minor hepatectomy had superior peri-operative outcomes resulting in lower total cost of care when compared to open minor hepatectomy. Financial considerations should not adversely influence selection of a robotic approach for minor hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Stewart
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| | - Paul Wong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Susanne Warner
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Gagandeep Singh
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Laleh Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|