Clinical benefits of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for postoperative delirium in elderly colon cancer patients

Reduced port laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic rectopexy is an established treatment option for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Recently, reduced port surgery (RPS) has emerged as a novel concept, offering reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional multiport surgery (MPS). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RPS for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

METHODS

From October 2012 to December 2018, 37 patients (MPS: 10 cases, RPS: 27 cases) underwent laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy (Wells procedure) is the standard technique for full-thickness rectal prolapse at our hospital. RPS was performed using a multi-channel access device, with an additional 12-mm right-hand port. Short-term outcomes were retrospectively compared between MPS and RPS.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between MPS and RPS in the median operative time, the median blood loss volume, the postoperative complication rates, and median hospital stay duration after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Reduced port laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy may serve as an effective therapeutic option for full-thickness rectal prolapse. However, to establish the superiority of RPS over MPS, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial is warranted.

Functional Outcomes after Abdominal Surgery in Older Adults - How concerned are we about this?

Amidst trends of a rapidly ageing population with better surgical outcomes for geriatric patients, it is imperative to consider outcome measures beyond mortality and morbidity rates. In fact, the preservation of one's postoperative function has been cited as a key priority for older adults and is a crucial determinant of postoperative independence and survival. This review aims to examine the prevalence of perioperative function reporting amongst older surgical patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery for cancer. We systematically reviewed studies from inception to December 2023 for studies which focused on the outcomes of older surgical patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery for cancer. Relevant citations were screened (title, abstract and full article review) based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 103 studies were included, of which only 31 studies consisting of 20885 participants reported perioperative function. While the nominal number of studies which report perioperative function has been on a steady rise since 2018, the proportion of studies which do so remains low. Postoperative function is three times less likely to be reported than preoperative function, suggesting that functional recovery is not sufficiently assessed. This suggests that there is still a poor uptake of functional recovery as an outcome measure amongst surgeons, and any increase in perioperative function reporting is likely due to the increased administration of frailty assessments. These findings should urge greater efforts in quantifying and enabling functional recovery to improve the clinical outcomes and quality of care for older surgical patients.

Geriatric prognostic scoring system predicts survival after hepatectomy for elderly patients with liver cancer

Aim

The number of elderly patients with liver cancer is increasing with the aging society. The Geriatric Prognostic Scoring System is useful in predicting the postoperative prognosis for elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of the present study was to assess the predictive ability of the geriatric prognostic scoring system for postoperative survival in elderly patients with liver cancer.

Methods

Eighty-eight patients aged ≥75 years who were treated for primary liver cancer and metastatic liver tumor were retrospectively analyzed. The Geriatric Prognostic Score (GPS) was created by several clinical parameters such as age, sex, type of cancer, stage, performance status, body mass index, and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Each patient was divided into two groups of high-risk to low-risk according to their GPS: ≧30 high-risk group and <30 low-risk. The predictive ability of geriatric prognostic scoring system for postoperative survival was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Of the 88 patients, 75 were diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma and 13 as colorectal liver metastasis. After geriatric prognostic scoring system assessments, 26 patients were diagnosed as high-risk and the remaining 62 as low-risk. The 3-year overall survival rates were 78.5% in the low-risk group and 35.1% in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). The univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival identified high GPS as an independent significant factor (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We could conclude that the geriatric prognostic scoring system is useful in predicting patients' prognosis after hepatectomy and it can provide helpful information to surgeons for determining treatment strategies for elderly patients with liver cancer.

Knee Extensor Weakness Potently Predicts Postoperative Outcomes in Older Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

Muscle weakness, assessed by grip strength, has been shown to predict postoperative mortality in older patients with cancer. Because lower extremity muscle strength well reflects physical performance, we examined whether lower knee extension muscle strength predicts postoperative mortality better than grip strength in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study in a single institution.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 813 patients (79.0 ± 4.2 years, 66.5% male) aged 65 years or older with gastrointestinal cancer who underwent preoperative evaluation of grip strength and isometric knee extension muscle strength between April 2012 and April 2019 were included.

METHODS

The study participants were prospectively followed up for postoperative mortality. Muscle weakness was defined as the lowest quartile of grip strength or knee extension strength (GS-muscle weakness and KS-muscle weakness, respectively).

RESULTS

Among the study participants, 176 patients died during a median follow-up of 716 days. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, we found that patients with both GS-muscle weakness and KS-muscle weakness had a lower survival rate than those without muscle weakness. As expected, higher clinical stages and abdominal and thoracic surgeries compared with endoscopic surgery were associated with increased all-cause mortality. In addition, we found that KS-muscle weakness, but not GS-muscle weakness, was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for sex, body mass index, cancer stage, surgical technique, and surgical site in the Cox proportional hazard model.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In older patients with gastrointestinal cancer, muscle weakness based on knee extension muscle strength can be a better predictor of postoperative prognosis than muscle weakness based on grip strength.

Effect of laparoscopic liver resection on postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a multifactorial and heterogeneous syndrome that is defined as acutely altered consciousness. This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the impact of postoperative delirium after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in elderly patients.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥75 years, who underwent curative liver resection for HCC at nine university hospitals from April 2010 to December 2017, were evaluated to compare short- and long-term outcomes between patients with and without delirium. Risk factors for delirium were determined using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative delirium was 14.2% (n = 80) in the study cohort of 562 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed smoking history, hypertension, sleeping pill consumption, and open liver resection as risk factors for postoperative delirium. The rate of other causes of death was significantly higher in the delirium group than in the no-delirium group although the rate of death at 1 year due to HCC or liver failure was similar between the two groups (p = .015). The 1-year mortality rates due to vascular diseases were 71.4% and 15.4% in the delirium and no-delirium groups, respectively (p = .022). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after liver resection were 86.6%, 64.1%, and 36.5% in the delirium group and 91.3%, 71.2%, and 56.9% in the no-delirium group, respectively (p = .046).

CONCLUSION

The multivariate analysis revealed the possible benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in reducing the rate of postoperative delirium after liver resection for HCC in elderly patients.

Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Predicts Postoperative Risk in Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative risk assessment is important in older patients because they often have comorbidities and impaired organ function. We performed preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for older patients with esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 217 patients over 75 years old who underwent esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer were analyzed. The CGA was performed preoperatively and included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Score (GDS), vitality index, Barthel index, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). We defined the robust group as patients with normal function on every instrument, and the pre-frail and frail groups as those with functional impairment on one instrument or two or more instruments, respectively. We assessed how the CGA correlated with postoperative complications and prognosis.

RESULTS

Of the 217 patients, 86 (39.6%) were in the robust group, 68 (31.3%) in the pre-frail group, and 63 (29.0%) in the frail group. Postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.026) and anastomotic leakage (P = 0.032) were significantly more common in the frail group. The frail group had a significantly longer postoperative hospitalization period (P = 0.016) and significantly lower rate of discharge to home (P = 0.016). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in the frail group (5-year overall survival rate, frail group versus others, 37.8% versus 52.0%, P = 0.046), but it was not significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative CGA in older patients with esophageal cancer was associated with risk of postoperative complications.

Comparison of low-dose morphine intrathecal analgesia and sufentanil PCIA in elderly patients with hip fracture undergoing single spinal anesthesia - a randomized clinical trial

Background

The complications of postoperative pain, such as hypertension, hypermetabolism, irritability, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, significantly affect the postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients. Intrathecal morphine prolongs analgesia after surgery, but has been implicated in nausea and vomiting, pruritus, postoperative respiratory depression, or apneic episodes. The present study explored the effect and safety of low-dose morphine used adjunctively with bupivacaine during single spinal anesthesia or sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients with hip fracture surgery. Since elderly patients often need anticoagulant therapy in the early postoperative period, single spinal anesthesia was involved in completing the operation in this study.

Methods

Eighty elderly patients aged 70–85 years who underwent elective hip fracture surgery with single spinal anesthesia were divided into two groups, 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 100 µg of morphine (morphine group, group M) and 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 100 µg of sufentanil PCIA (sufentanil group, group S). The analgesia scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Brinell comfort scale (BCS) were evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, and adverse reactions were recorded such as nausea and vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression, and POD (postoperative delirium) with Delirium Rating Scale-r 98.

Results

Within 24 h after operation, the analgesic and BCS scores of group M were better than those of group S (P < 0.05). Group M had higher frequency of skin pruritus than group S within 24 h, and the difference was statistically significant. The incidence of POD in group M (2 cases) was lower than that in group S (6 cases) (5.71% vs 18.18%) (P < 0.05) with the DRS-r 98 scores. No significant difference was observed in nausea and vomiting between the two groups, and the difference of severe respiratory depression was not found in both groups.

Conclusion

Compared with sufentanil PCIA, low-dose intrathecal morphine has a satisfactory analgesic effect, and little effect on the patient's cognitive function with low medical cost. Under effective respiratory monitoring, it can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients with hip fracture.

Trial registration

Registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under ChiCTR2100042706. 26/01/2021.

A clinical risk analysis of early post-operative delirium after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Early post-operative delirium (EPOD) is a frequent complication following colorectal surgery. The present study investigated the risk factors for EPOD after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among 208 patients ≥70 years old who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the clinicopathological factors associated with the EPOD.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of EPOD was 10.1% (21/208). The univariate analysis showed that an older age (≥80 years old; P=0.002), sleeping pill medication before surgery (P=0.037), a history of dementia (P=0.030) and cerebrovascular disease (P=0.017), elevated levels of D-dimer (P=0.016), maximum intraoperative temperature ≥37 °C (P=0.036), and non-continuous usage of droperidol with analgesia (P=0.005) were associated with EPOD. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed an older age (≥80 years old; odds ratio [OR]: 6.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-20.15, P=0.002), sleeping pill medication before surgery (OR: 5.39, 95% CI: 1.36-21.28, P=0.016), history of cerebrovascular disease (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 1.12-13.66, P=0.033), and maximum intraoperative temperature ≥37 °C (OR: 5.10, 95% CI: 1.53-16.92, P=0.008) to be independent risk factors. When the patients were divided into groups according to the number of positive risk factors, the prevalence rate was 6.5%, 16.0%, and 63.6% for patients with 1, 2, and 3 positive risk factors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that an older age, sleeping pill medication before surgery, history of cerebrovascular disease, and maximum intraoperative temperature ≥37 °C are independent risk factors of EPOD after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients.

Single-port laparoscopic colectomy in elderly patients with colon cancer: A propensity score-matched comparison with younger patients

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) in elderly patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

During the study period, 344 patients underwent SPLC in our hospital. Among them, 87 patients were aged 80 years and older, and 257 patients were younger than 80 years. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, 87 elderly patients were compared with 87 young patients.

RESULTS

Short-term clinical outcomes after SPLC were equivalent between the two groups, although the elderly group had a higher ASA score and more postoperative complications. The 5-year overall survival rates were 64.6% in the elderly group and 66.8% in control group. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 78.0% in the elderly group and 70.9% in control group. There were no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that SPLC is technically feasible for operative teams that have adequately standardized the procedure, and it is oncologically safe in elderly patients with colon cancer.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative delirium is common after any type of surgery and can lead to serious outcomes; thus, its prevention is important. Early assessment can help identify patients at higher risk of postoperative delirium. However, the risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients who underwent colorectal surgery are unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the risk factors for postoperative delirium after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

We selected all articles related to postoperative delirium after colorectal surgery published up to March 2019. Studies using any method for diagnosing delirium were eligible. Ovid-Embase, Ovid-Medline, and the Cochrane library were searched. Two reviewers independently conducted quality assessment and data collection. The risk factors identified in the studies were recorded, and a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 1216 studies initially screened, 1197 were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Finally, 14 articles were identified to be relevant for this review. In total, 11 of the 14 studies reported the risk factors for postoperative delirium. The incidence of postoperative delirium ranged from 8% to 54%. A total of 19 risk factors were identified, and we classified them into two categories as patient-related and treatment-related risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative delirium is highly common in those undergoing colorectal surgery including cancer, with advanced old age, history of preoperative delirium and preoperative serum albumin level which are risk factors for POD. Larger multi-institutional randomized studies to address this issue are warranted in the future.

Prevalence and risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients with colorectal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common, but severe complication in elderly patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, but the prevalence and potential risk factors for POD were not well established. Therefore, a meta-analysis was preformed to clarify the prevalence and risk factors of POD in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on August 2019. Studies were included if they reported the prevalence and risk factors of POD in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. The guidelines for critically appraising studies of prevalence or incidence of a health problem were used to assess the quality of included studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for individual risk factors were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel methods in random effect model. Sensitive analyses based on different inclusion criteria were conducted to explore whether the current meta-analysis was enough credible and robust.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies totaling 4472 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were included. The pooled prevalence of POD is 14% (95% CI = 12-17%). Twelve significant risk factors were identified in pooled analysis including older age (OR = 1.10), sex (OR = 1.87), history of psychiatric disease (OR = 6.47), comorbidities (OR = 2.17), prognostic nutritional index (OR = 1.12), physical status (OR = 1.27), American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (ASA Scores) (OR = 1.65), history of alcohol abuse (OR = 2.23), postoperative pain management (OR = 1.91), perioperative blood transfusion (OR = 2.37), cognitive status (OR = 1.91), and lower serum level of albumin (OR = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

POD is a frequent complication in patients undergoing surgery with colorectal cancer. Several risk factors including history of psychiatric disease, transfusion, comorbidities, male gender, and old age were significant predictors for POD.

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acute postoperative pain intensity and mobility after hip fracture: A double-blinded, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive modality which may be used to reduce acute postoperative pain. Intense perioperative pain within the first few days after hip fracture surgery is common and is related to negative consequences such as restricted and delayed ambulation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to examine the effect of incorporating TENS treatment on pain intensity, and mobility, with standard rehabilitation care during the acute post-operative phase following Gamma-nail surgical fixation of extracapsular hip fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to a supplement of 30 mins of active TENS or sham TENS. The standard rehabilitation care included five daily 30 mins physical therapy treatments beginning 24 hrs after surgery. Outcome measures were: pain intensity at rest, at night and during ambulation (assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale; Functional Ambulation Classification instrument; time to complete five sit-to-stand tests; and two-minute walk test). Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon score rank tests. Significance was set at p≤0.05.

RESULTS

Significantly greater pain reduction during walking was noted in the active TENS group compared to sham TENS group (differences between the fifth and the second days: 2.55±1.37 vs 1.06± 1.11, respectively; p=0.0011). Additionally, advantage of active TENS was demonstrated in greater increase in walking distance on the fifth day and higher level of mobility compared to the sham TENS group. No additional effects of active TENS were noted on pain intensity at rest and at night and on five times sit-to-stand performance.

CONCLUSION

Addition of TENS to the standard care of elderly patients in the early days following Gamma nail surgical fixation of extracapsular hip fracture is recommended for pain management while walking and functional gait recovery. The effect of TENS on long-term functional outcomes should be explored in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the ISRCTN registry: ID ISRCTN32476360.

Safety of Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery Requiring Perioperative Heparinization in Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

We assessed the feasibility and safety of single-site laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer who required perioperative heparinization.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 390 patients who underwent single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2016. Antithrombotic drugs were stopped preoperatively and heparin was administered according to the operative risk of each patient, based on consultation with the cardiologist physician or neurosurgeon. Propensity score modeling was utilized to adjust for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients, 29 were treated with standard bridging intravenous heparin therapy. Propensity matching identified 119 patients: 22 patients in the heparinization group and 97 in the control group. The matched groups were not significantly different in operation times, bleeding volumes, or conversion rate. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 17.9 days in the heparinization group and 9.5 days in the control group (p = 0.034). Postoperative bleeding was observed in 4 patients (18.2%) in the heparinization group and 11 patients (11.4%) in the control group (p = 0.646), while other complications were similar in the two study groups (p = 0.502). Of these other complications, thromboembolic events were observed in two patients in the heparinization group and one patient in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with heparinization was feasible and safe. Heparinization did not increase the risk of postoperative bleeding complications, but postoperative hospital stay was prolonged.

The role of exclusive enteral nutrition in the preoperative optimization of laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's disease: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence has shown that there are significant advantages associated with the use of laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease (CD). However, the impact of preoperative exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) on postoperative complications and CD recurrence following laparoscopic surgery have not been investigated.

METHODS

A total of 120 CD patients undergoing bowel resection with laparoscopic surgery were eligible for this study. Patient data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Before laparoscopic surgery, 45 CD patients received EEN for at least 4 weeks, and 75 CD patients had no EEN. Postoperative complications, and endoscopic and clinical recurrence were subsequently measured and compared after laparoscopic surgery and during follow-up assessments.

RESULTS

Patients who received EEN had significant improvements in their nutritional (albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and hemoglobin) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) status after the EEN treatment prior to surgery (P < 0.05). Patients who received EEN also experienced fewer postoperative complications, decreased surgical site infections, and a lower comprehensive complication index (P < 0.05). The endoscopic recurrence rates 6 months after surgery were also decreased significantly in patients who received EEN (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of clinical recurrence was similar in the 2 groups at 1-year follow-up. Endoscopic recurrence was correlated with ileocolonic disease, EEN before surgery, and PNI (P < 0.05). PNI remained independently associated with endoscopic recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative EEN for at least 4 weeks improved CD patients' nutritional and inflammatory status, which in turn reduced postoperative complications following laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic recurrence on follow-up.

Incidence and clinical significance of postoperative delirium after brain tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

Delirium is an acute and reversible deterioration of mental state. Postoperative delirium (POD) can develop after surgical procedures and is associated with impaired health status and worse recovery. So far, there is little data about postoperative delirium after brain surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate frequency, risk factors, and prognostic value of POD in predicting short-term postoperative outcomes after brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

Five-hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent elective brain tumor surgery in 2010-2017 were included in this prospective study. Patients were monitored for POD using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) for 2 to 7 days after the surgery. At hospital discharge, outcomes were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

RESULTS

POD was diagnosed in 22 (4.2%) patients. Risk factors of POD were low level of hemoglobin, poor functional status at time of admission, low education level and older age (65 years and older). POD incidence was not associated with brain tumor laterality, location, extent of resection, histological diagnosis, or affected brain lobe. POD was associated with greater risk for unfavorable outcomes at hospital discharge (OR = 5.3; 95% CI [2.1-13.4], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

POD is not a common complication after elective brain tumor surgery. Older age, poor functional status, low education level and anemia are associated with greater POD risk. Extent of surgical intervention and brain tumor location are not associated with POD risk. POD is associated with worse outcome at hospital discharge.