1
|
Portale G, Spolverato YC, Tonello AS, Bartolotta P, Frigo G, Simonetto M, Gregori D, Fiscon V. Which video technology brings the higher cognitive burden and motion sickness in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K? a propensity score study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:190. [PMID: 37428283 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04491-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological development has offered laparoscopic colorectal surgeons new video systems to improve depth perception and perform difficult task in limited space. The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive burden and motion sickness for surgeons during 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K laparoscopic colorectal procedures and to report post-operative data with the different video systems employed. METHODS Patients were assigned to either 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K video and two questionnaires (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-SSQ- and NASA Task Load Index -TLX) were used during elective laparoscopic colorectal resections (October 2020-August 2022) from two operating surgeons. Short-term results of the operations performed with the three different video systems were also analyzed. RESULTS A total of 113 consecutive patients were included: 41 (36%) in the 3D Group (A), 46 (41%) in the 3D-4 K Group and 26 (23%) in the 2D-4 K Group (C). Weighted and adjusted regression models showed no significant difference in cognitive load amongst the surgeons in the three groups of video systems when using the NASA-TLX. An increased risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain in the 3D-4 K group compared with 2D-4 K group (OR = 3.5; p = 0.0057 and OR = 2.8; p = 0.0096, respectively) was observed. Further, slight/moderate difficulty focusing was lower in both 3D and 3D-4 K groups compared with 2D-4 K group (OR = 0.4; p = 0.0124 and OR = 0.5; p = 0.0341, respectively), and higher in the 3D-4 K group compared with 3D group (OR = 2.6; p = 0.0124). Patient population characteristics, operative time, post-operative staging, complication rate and length of stay were similar in the three groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS 3D and 3D-4 K systems, when compared with 2D-4 K video technology, have a higher risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain, but show lower difficulty focusing. Short post-operative outcomes do not differ, whichever imaging system is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Portale
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40; 35013, Cittadella, Padua, Italy.
| | - Ylenia Camilla Spolverato
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40; 35013, Cittadella, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Bartolotta
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Frigo
- Department of Cardiology, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Cittadella, Italy
| | - Marco Simonetto
- Department of Neurology, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Cittadella, Italy
| | - Dario Gregori
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentino Fiscon
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40; 35013, Cittadella, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cassinotti E, Al-Taher M, Antoniou SA, Arezzo A, Baldari L, Boni L, Bonino MA, Bouvy ND, Brodie R, Carus T, Chand M, Diana M, Eussen MMM, Francis N, Guida A, Gontero P, Haney CM, Jansen M, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Muller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Oderda M, Parise P, Rosati R, Schijven MP, Silecchia G, Soares AS, Urakawa S, Vettoretto N. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) consensus on Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1629-1648. [PMID: 36781468 PMCID: PMC10017637 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09928-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery during open and laparoscopic procedures has exponentially expanded across various clinical settings. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on this topic with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community. METHODS An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate to this project. Systematic reviews of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by the panel; they were then submitted to all EAES members through a two-rounds online survey and results presented at the EAES annual congress, Barcelona, November 2021. RESULTS A total of 18,273 abstracts were screened with 117 articles included. 22 statements and 16 recommendations were generated and approved. In some areas, such as the use of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery and the search for the sentinel lymph nodes in gynaecological malignancies, the large number of evidences in literature has allowed us to strongly recommend the use of ICG for a better anatomical definition and a reduction in post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS Overall, from the systematic literature review performed by the experts panel and the survey extended to all EAES members, ICG fluorescence-guided surgery could be considered a safe and effective technology. Future robust clinical research is required to specifically validate multiple organ-specific applications and the potential benefits of this technique on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cassinotti
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Al-Taher
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - S A Antoniou
- Department of Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - L Baldari
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R Brodie
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - T Carus
- Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Elisabeth-Hospital, Thuine, Germany
| | - M Chand
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Diana
- IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery and IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France
| | - M M M Eussen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | - A Guida
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - C M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - B P Muller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Oderda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Parise
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Policlinico di Abano Terme, Abano Terme, PD, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A S Soares
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Urakawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - N Vettoretto
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Montichiari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Portale G, Bartolotta P, Azzolina D, Gregori D, Fiscon V. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 2D or 3D video system technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:34. [PMID: 36773133 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04342-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery relies on 2D image systems in most centers. However, 3D vision has gained popularity and is used nowadays in a constantly rising number of units. Right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and lymph node dissection represents a surgical procedure that may benefit the most from 3D vision. The aim of the study was to summarize the available literature on the use of 2D vs. 3D video imaging in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted including Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (PROSPERO registration number CRD 42022344764) through October 2022. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines and GRADEpro to develop a summary of evidence tables. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS Five observational retrospective studies (496 patients, 275 2D and 216 3D) were included. One study was rated as having a critical risk of bias; the remaining had low to moderate risk. 2D laparoscopic right hemicolectomy patients showed longer anastomotic time in 3/3 studies (MD = 3.32; 95%CI, 1.58-5.05; p = 0.002) and an upward trend in operative time in 4/5 studies (MD = 9.98; 95%CI, -1.42, 21.37; p = 0.086) compared to 3D. The two image video systems had similar short-term outcomes, including the number of lymph nodes harvested (MD = -0.67; 95%CI, -2.47, 1.13; p = 0.47), morbidity (OR post-operative complications = 1.12; 95%CI, 0.71-1.77; p = 0.62), and length of stay (MD = 0.27; 95%CI, -0.59, 1.13; p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS 2D and 2D laparoscopic right hemicolectomy had similar complications rate, with a shorter anastomotic time along with a downward trend in overall operative time for 3D. Larger prospective randomized trials are awaited before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Portale
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Cittadella, Padova, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Bartolotta
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121, Padova, Italy
| | - Danila Azzolina
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121, Padova, Italy
| | - Dario Gregori
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121, Padova, Italy
| | - Valentino Fiscon
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Cittadella, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tallarico S, Aloini D, Dulmin R, Lazzini S, Mininno V, Pellegrini L. Health Technology Assessment of medical devices. Overcoming the critical issues of current assessment. JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Aloini
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - Riccardo Dulmin
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - Simone Lazzini
- Department of Economics and Management University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - Valeria Mininno
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - Luisa Pellegrini
- Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Ferrario L, Gerardi C, Molteni B, Nocco U, Lettieri E, Molfino S, Baiocchi GL, Elmore U, Rosati R, Currò G, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Cirocchi R, Marano A, Petz WL, Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Davini F, Biondi A, Anania G, Agresta F, Silecchia G. Could fluorescence-guided surgery be an efficient and sustainable option? A SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery) health technology assessment summary. Surg Endosc 2021; 34:3270-3284. [PMID: 32274626 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07542-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green fluorescence vision is an upcoming technology in surgery. It can be used in three ways: angiographic and biliary tree visualization and lymphatic spreading studies. The present paper shows the most outstanding results from an health technology assessment study design, conducted on fluorescence-guided compared with standard vision surgery. METHODS A health technology assessment approach was implemented to investigate the economic, social, ethical, and organizational implications related to the adoption of the innovative fluorescence-guided view, with a focus on minimally invasive approach. With the support of a multidisciplinary team, qualitative and quantitative data were collected, by means of literature evidence, validated questionnaires and self-reported interviews, considering the dimensions resulting from the EUnetHTA Core Model. RESULTS From a systematic search of literature, we retrieved the following studies: 6 on hepatic, 1 on pancreatic, 4 on biliary, 2 on bariatric, 4 on endocrine, 2 on thoracic, 11 on colorectal, 7 on urology, 11 on gynecology, 2 on gastric surgery. Fluorescence guide has shown advantages on the length of hospitalization particularly in colorectal surgery, with a reduction of the rate of leakages and re-do anastomoses, in spite of a slight increase in operating time, and is confirmed to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable vision technology. Clinical applications are still presenting a low evidence in the literature. CONCLUSION The present paper, under the patronage of Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, based on an HTA approach, sustains the use of fluorescence-guided vision in minimally invasive surgery, in the fields of general, gynecologic, urologic, and thoracic surgery, as an efficient and economically sustainable technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Vettoretto
- Chirurgia Montichiari, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili, V.le Ciotti 154, Montichiari, 25018, Brescia, Italy.
| | - E Foglia
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - L Ferrario
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - C Gerardi
- Centro di Politiche Regolatorie, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - B Molteni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Nocco
- Ingegneria Clinica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - E Lettieri
- School of Management, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico, Milano, Italy
| | - S Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G L Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - G Currò
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - E Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - A Marano
- Chirurgia Generale ed Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - W L Petz
- Chirurgia, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - F Davini
- Centro multidisciplinare Chirurgia Robotica, Chirurgia Toracica mini-invasiva e Robotica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Biondi
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Anania
- Chirurgia Generale, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Agresta
- Chirurgia Generale, Azienda ULSS 5 "Polesana", Hospital of Adria, Adria, RO, Italy
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ergonomic effects of medical augmented reality glasses in video-assisted surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:988-998. [PMID: 33638103 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08363-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to objectively compare medical augmented reality glasses (ARG) and conventional monitors in video-assisted surgery and to systematically analyze its ergonomic benefits. METHODS Three surgeons (thoracic, laparoscopic, and thyroid surgeons) participated in the study. Six thoracoscopic metastasectomies, six subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomies, and six thyroidectomies were performed with and without ARG. The subjective experience was evaluated using a questionnaire-based NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Postures during surgeries were recorded. The risk of musculoskeletal disorders associated with video-assisted surgery was assessed using rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded. Muscle fatigue was objectively measured. RESULTS NASA-TLX scores of three surgeons were lower when ARG was used compared to those with conventional monitor (66.4 versus 82.7). Less workload during surgery was reported with ARG. The laparoscopic surgeon exhibited a substantial decrease in mental and physical demand [- 21.1 and 12.5%)] and the thyroid surgeon did (- 40.0 and - 66.7%).Total REBA scores decreased with ARG (8 to 3.6). The risk of musculoskeletal disorders was improved in regions of the neck and shoulders. Root mean square (RMS) of the EMG signal decreased from 0.347 ± 0.150 to 0.286 ± 0.130 (p = 0.010) with usage of ARG; a decrease was observed in all surgeons. The greatest RMS decrease was observed in trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The decrease in brachioradialis muscle was small. CONCLUSION ARG assisted with correction of bad posture in surgeons during video-assisted surgery and reduced muscular fatigue of the upper body. This study highlights the superior ergonomic efficiency of ARG in video-assisted surgery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Botteri E, Ortenzi M, Alemanno G, Giordano A, Travaglio E, Turolo C, Castiglioni S, Treppiedi E, Rosso E, Gattolin A, Caracino V, Prosperi P, Valeri A, Guerrieri M, Vettoretto N. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by junior SUrgeonS: impact of 3D visualization on surgical outcome. Randomized multicentre clinical trial. (LAPSUS TRIAL). Surg Endosc 2021; 35:710-717. [PMID: 32060747 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07436-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 3D visualization applied to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed by young surgeons (YS). We considered both operative features and clinical outcomes, aiming to highlight the benefits that this technology could bring to novice surgeons and their laparoscopic training. METHODS All the surgical procedures were performed by residents who had performed less than 20 appendectomies prior to the beginning of the study under the supervision of an expert surgeon. At the time of enrolment patients were randomized into two arms: Experimental arm (EA): laparoscopic appendectomy performed with laparoscopic 3D vision technology. Control arm (CA): laparoscopic appendectomy performed with the "standard" 2D technology. The primary endpoint was to find any statistically significant difference in operative time between the two arms. Differences in conversion rate, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications and surgeons' operative comfort were considered as secondary endpoints. RESULTS We randomized 135 patients into the two study arms. The two groups were homogeneous for demographic characteristics, BMI and ASA scores. The characteristics of clinical presentation and anatomical position showed no significant difference. The operative time was longer in the CA (57.5 vs. 49.6 min, p = 0.048, 95% CI). In the subgroup of complicated appendicitis, this trend toward inferior operative time was confirmed without reaching statistical significance (2D = 60 min, 3D = 49.5 min, p = 0.082 95% CI). No intra-operative complications were observed in either group. The conversion rate was 5.6% (4 patients) in the 2D group and 4.6% (3 patients) in 3D group. CONCLUSION The utilization of 3D laparoscopy was associated with reduction in operative time without influencing other parameters, in particular without altering the safety profile of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST SPEDALI CIVILI BRESCIA, Montichiari, Italy.
- Montichiari, General Surgery, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy.
| | - M Ortenzi
- Clinical Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | - E Travaglio
- General Surgery, Regina Montis Regalis, Mondovì, Italy
| | - C Turolo
- General Surgery, ASST SPEDALI CIVILI BRESCIA, Montichiari, Italy
| | - S Castiglioni
- 2° General Surgery, Hospital 'Spirito Santo', Pescara, Italy
| | - E Treppiedi
- General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - E Rosso
- General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Gattolin
- General Surgery, Regina Montis Regalis, Mondovì, Italy
| | - V Caracino
- 2° General Surgery, Hospital 'Spirito Santo', Pescara, Italy
| | | | | | - M Guerrieri
- Clinical Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - N Vettoretto
- General Surgery, ASST SPEDALI CIVILI BRESCIA, Montichiari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Inoue S, Ikeda K, Goto K, Hieda K, Hayashi T, Teishima J. Comparison of Chief Surgeons' and Assistants' Feelings of Fatigue Between Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Conventional Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy. World J Surg 2021; 45:1466-1474. [PMID: 33506294 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-05962-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to compare the surgical staff's feelings of fatigue between laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (CLA) before and after surgery. METHOD Data were collected for surgical procedures performed between June 2011 and September 2017 (57 LESS-A and 37 CLA). Each procedure in both groups was performed by the same chief surgeon. The subjective fatigue feelings of the key members of the surgical team (chief surgeon, scopist, assistant surgeon) were assessed using the "Jikaku-sho shirabe" questionnaire, which contained questions about work-related feelings of fatigue. It consisted of 25 subjective items for 5 factors drawn from factor analysis (drowsiness, instability, uneasiness, local pain or dullness, and eyestrain). For each item, the participants were requested to estimate the intensity of their feelings using a five-point rating scale before and after surgery. RESULTS There was no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.231) between the LESS-A and CLA procedure groups. For the chief surgeon, local pain or dullness (p = 0.603) and eyestrain (p = 0.086) were similar between the LESS-A and CLA procedures. The scopists and assistant surgeons in the LESS-A group did not suffer local pain or dullness (p = 0.793 and p = 0.240, respectively). They did, however, suffer more eyestrain than those in the CLA group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Although LESS-A is generally considered to be a technically difficult procedure, the results of this study demonstrate that the feelings of physical fatigue are roughly equivalent between LESS-A and CLA procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogo Inoue
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Kenichiro Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Keisuke Goto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Keisuke Hieda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Tetsutaro Hayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Portale G, Pedon S, Benacchio L, Cipollari C, Fiscon V. Two-dimensional (2-D) vs. three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: comparison of short-term results. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5279-5286. [PMID: 32940793 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07977-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few reports comparing safety and efficacy of 2-D and 3-D video technology in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The aim of the study was to assess the short-term results of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LHR) with intracorporeal anastomosis with 2-D/3-D video in patients with right colon cancer. METHODS Data from 239 patients undergoing LRH for cancer in a 14-year period (June 2005-January 2020) were prospectively collected. Surgical procedures were performed by two expert laparoscopic surgeons. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study: 55 (48.2%) operated with 2-D and 59 (51.8%) with 3-D video. Tumor site and postoperative stage distribution were similar. Mean operative time was comparable in the two groups (159.0 ± 48.8 min vs. 17.06 ± 36.0 min, p = ns, group 2-D and 3-D, respectively). Group 3-D patients had a similar percentage of associated procedures (44.1% vs. 29.1%, p = ns). Intraoperative complications were nil in both groups, while postoperative complications were similar (30.9% 2-D vs 25.4% 3-D, p = ns). The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was similar in group 3-D (26.0 ± 14.6 vs. 22.9 ± 9.3, p = ns) and the length of stay was comparable in 3-D and 2-D patients (8.4 ± 2.6 vs. 9.1 ± 3.3 days, respectively, p = ns). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic 3-D vision is as equally effective as 2-D vision in LRH with intracorporeal anastomosis, with a similar proportion of associated procedures and number of lymph nodes retrieved in the same operative time. Further prospective larger randomized studies are necessary to verify if LRH with 3-D video can reduce postoperative complications, compared to 2-D video.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Portale
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40, 35013, Cittadella, Italy.
| | - Sabrina Pedon
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40, 35013, Cittadella, Italy
| | - Luca Benacchio
- Department of Epidemiology, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Cipollari
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40, 35013, Cittadella, Italy
| | - Valentino Fiscon
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Euganea ULSS 6, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40, 35013, Cittadella, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez-Hermosa JI, Ranea A, Delisau O, Planellas-Giné P, Cornejo L, Pujadas M, Codony C, Gironès J, Codina-Cazador A. Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:1163-1173. [PMID: 32909079 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01950-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopy is the standard technique for resecting adrenal tumors worldwide. The main drawbacks of conventional 2D laparoscopy are limited depth perception and tactile feedback. Currently available high-quality 3D laparoscopy systems might improve surgical outcomes for adrenalectomy. We compare the safety and efficacy of 3D versus 2D laparoscopy in the treatment of adrenal tumors. METHODS This case-control study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients with benign or malignant adrenal tumors treated laparoscopically at a single academic medical center between April 2003 and March 2020. We collected demographic, diagnostic, preoperative, and operative variables, and used multiple linear and logistic regression to analyze differences in various short-term outcomes between the two approaches while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS We included 150 patients: 128 with benign tumors and 22 with malignant tumors; 95 treated with 3D laparoscopy (case group); and 55 with 2D laparoscopy (control group). After adjustment for patient, surgical, and tumor characteristics, a 2D vision was associated with a longer operative time (β = 0.26, p = 0.002) and greater blood loss (β = 0.20, p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47 (95% CI 0.90-22.31); p = 0.549) or complications (3.6% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.624). CONCLUSIONS With experienced surgeons, laparoscopic adrenalectomy was safer and more feasible with the 3D system than with the 2D system, resulting in less operative blood loss and shorter operative time with no differences in rates of conversion to open surgery or postoperative complications. For adrenal tumors, 3D laparoscopy offers advantages over 2D laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Ignacio Rodríguez-Hermosa
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain. .,Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain. .,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain. .,Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
| | - Alejandro Ranea
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Olga Delisau
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Pere Planellas-Giné
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Lídia Cornejo
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Marcel Pujadas
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Clara Codony
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Jordi Gironès
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Antoni Codina-Cazador
- Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sánchez-Margallo FM, Durán Rey D, Serrano Pascual Á, Mayol Martínez JA, Sánchez-Margallo JA. Comparative Study of the Influence of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Urological Laparoscopy on Surgeons' Surgical Performance and Ergonomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol 2020; 35:123-137. [PMID: 32799686 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision systems with traditional two-dimensional systems in laparoscopic urological surgery, analyzing the benefits, limitations, and impact of introducing this medical technology with regard to surgical performance and the surgeon's ergonomics. Methods: A systematic review with a structured bibliographic search was conducted in the electronic libraries (PubMed and EMBASE) until August 2019 and with no language restrictions. Studies on 3D visualization technology in laparoscopic urologic surgery, randomized controlled trials, and observational comparative studies were included. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 25 articles were obtained, of which 4 were clinical studies with patients, 2 studies were carried out in experimental animal models, and the remaining 19 were conducted in simulated environments. Regarding the European training program in basic laparoscopic urological skills, the results showed no significant differences in execution time using either imaging system. Three-dimensional vision led to a significant reduction in surgery time in pyeloplasty and radical nephrectomy. In addition, there was a reported decrease in blood loss in adrenalectomy, nephron-sparing nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, simple nephrectomy, and pyeloplasty using 3D vision. Regarding ergonomics, the studies generally described no differences in side effects (headache, nausea, eye strain) when comparing the two types of visualization systems. Surgeons reported reduced workloads and stress with 3D vision than with traditional laparoscopy. Conclusions: Three-dimensional laparoscopic systems essentially advance surgical performance in less-experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Three-dimensional laparoscopy leads to improvements in surgery time, which is important for specific surgical procedures involving intracorporeal ligatures and sutures. The results achieved on the surgeons' ergonomics showed better depth perception and decreased stress and workloads during 3D vision with no differences in potential side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Durán Rey
- Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubromel A, Duvinage-Vonesch MA, Geffroy L, Dussart C. Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2020; 8:1810905. [PMID: 32944200 PMCID: PMC7482895 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organizational aspect is rarely considered in healthcare. However, it is gradually seen as one of the key aspects of the decision-making process as well as clinical and economic dimensions. Our primary objective was to identify criteria already used to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. Our secondary objective was to structure them into an inventory to support decision-makers to select the relevant criteria for their complex decision-making issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search using the Medline database was conducted in June 2019. The records published between January, 1990 and December, 2018 were identified. The publications cited by the authors of the included articles and the websites of health technology assessment agencies, units or learned societies identified during the search were also consulted. The identified criteria were structured in an inventory. RESULTS We selected 107 records of a wide range of evidence mostly published after the 2000s. We identified 636 criteria that we classified into five categories: people, task, structure, technology, and surroundings. CONCLUSION Criteria selection is a crucial step in any multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). This work is the first step in the development of a validated MCDA method to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Dubromel
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pharmacie Et Stérilisation Centrales, Saint-Genis-Laval, France
| | | | - Loïc Geffroy
- Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA 4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Claude Dussart
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pharmacie Et Stérilisation Centrales, Saint-Genis-Laval, France
- Laboratory “Systemic Health Care”, EA 4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kunert W, Storz P, Dietz N, Axt S, Falch C, Kirschniak A, Wilhelm P. Learning curves, potential and speed in training of laparoscopic skills: a randomised comparative study in a box trainer. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3303-3312. [PMID: 32642847 PMCID: PMC8195927 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07768-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of practical surgical training is characterised by an inherent learning curve. Decisive are individual initial starting capabilities, learning speed, ideal learning plateaus, and resulting learning potentials. The quantification of learning curves requires reproducible tasks with varied levels of difficulty. The hypothesis of this study is that the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision is more advantageous than two-dimensional vision (2D) for the learning curve in laparoscopic training. Methods Forty laparoscopy novices were recruited and randomised to a 2D Group and a 3D Group. A laparoscopy box trainer with two standardised tasks was used for training of surgical tasks. Task 1 was a positioning task, while Task 2 called for laparoscopic knotting as a more complex process. Each task was repeated at least ten times. Performance time and the number of predefined errors were recorded. 2D performance after 3D training was assessed in an additional final 2D cycle undertaken by the 3D Group. Results The calculated learning plateaus of both performance times and errors were lower for 3D. Independent of the vision mode the learning curves were smoother (exponential decay) and efficiency was learned faster than precision. The learning potentials varied widely depending on the corresponding initial values and learning plateaus. The final 2D performance time of the 3D-trained group was not significantly better than that of the 2D Group. The final 2D error numbers were similar for all groups. Conclusions Stereoscopic vision can speed up laparoscopic training. The 3D learning curves resulted in better precision and efficiency. The 3D-trained group did not show inferior performance in the final 2D cycle. Consequently, we encourage the training of surgical competences like suturing and knotting under 3D vision, even if it is not available in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Kunert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Pirmin Storz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany.,Clinic for General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Dietz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany.,Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Virchowstr. 20, 46047, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - Steffen Axt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claudius Falch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kirschniak
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Peter Wilhelm
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Surgical Technology and Training, Tuebingen University Hospital, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cheruiyot I, Nyaanga F, Kipkorir V, Munguti J, Ndung'u B, Henry B, Cirocchi R, Tomaszewski K. The prevalence of the Rouviere's sulcus: A meta-analysis with implications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clin Anat 2020; 34:556-564. [PMID: 32285514 DOI: 10.1002/ca.23605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Rouvière's sulcus (RS) is increasingly being recognized as an important extra-biliary landmark during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic analysis of the prevalence and morphological types of RS. A systematic search was conducted through the major databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SciELO, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies eligible for inclusion. The data were extracted and pooled into a random-effects meta-analysis using STATA software. The primary and secondary outcomes of the study were the pooled prevalence of RS and its morphological types, respectively. A total of 23 studies (n = 4,495 patients) were included. The overall pooled prevalence of RS was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] [78, 87]). There were no significant differences in prevalence between cadaveric studies (82%, 95% CI [76, 87]) and laparoscopic studies (83%, 95% CI [77, 88]). The open RS constituted 66% (95% CI [61, 71]) of all cases, while the closed type was present in 34% (95% CI [29, 39]). RS is a relatively constant anatomical structure that can be reliably identified in most patients undergoing cholecystectomy. It can therefore be used as a fixed extra-biliary landmark for the appropriate site at which to start dissecting during LC to help prevent iatrogenic bile duct injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Cheruiyot
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.,International Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Fiona Nyaanga
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Vincent Kipkorir
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jeremiah Munguti
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Bernard Ndung'u
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Brandon Henry
- International Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.,Cincinnati Children's Medical Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Krzysztof Tomaszewski
- International Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cognitive load in 3d and 2d minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:3262-3269. [PMID: 32239306 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07524-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3d) laparoscopy has been introduced to enhance depth perception and facilitate surgical operations. The aim of this study was to compare cognitive load during 3d and 2d laparoscopic procedures. METHODS Two subjective questionnaires (the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and the NASA task load index) were used to prospectively collect data regarding cognitive load in surgeons performing 2d and 3d laparoscopic colorectal resections. Moreover, the perioperative results of 3d and 2d laparoscopic operations were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 313 patients were included: 82 in the 2d group and 231 in the 3d group. The NASA TLX results did not reveal significantly major cognitive load differences in the 3d group compared with the 2d group; the SSQ results were better in the 3d group than in the 2d group in terms of general discomfort, whereas difficulty concentrating, difficulty focusing, and fatigue were more frequent in 3d operations than in 2d operations (p = 0.001-0.038). The results of age, sex, and ASA score were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.299-0.374). The median operative time showed no statistically significant difference between the 3d and 2d groups (median, IQR, 2d 150 min [120-180]-3d 160 min [130-190] p = 0.611). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of severe complications between patients in the 3d group and in the 2d group (2d 7 [8.54%] vs 3d 21 [9.1%], p = 0.271). The median hospitalization time and the reoperation rate showed no difference between the 2d and 3d operations (p = 0.417-0.843). CONCLUSION The NASA TLX did not reveal a significant difference in cognitive load between the 2d and 3d groups, whereas data reported by the SSQ showed a mild risk of cognitive load in the 3d group. Furthermore, 3d laparoscopic surgery revealed the same postoperative results as 2d standard laparoscopy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bracale U, Merola G, Rizzuto A, Pontecorvi E, Silvestri V, Pignata G, Pirozzi F, Cuccurullo D, Sciuto A, Corcione F. Does a 3D laparoscopic approach improve surgical outcome of mininvasive right colectomy? A retrospective case-control study. Updates Surg 2020; 72:445-451. [PMID: 32232743 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00755-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance due its benefits for patients. However, advanced laparoscopic procedures are still challenging. One critical issue is lack of stereoscopic vision. Despite its diffusion, the totally laparoscopic approach for right hemicolectomy (TLRC) is still debated due to its difficulty, particularly for fashioning of the ileocolic anastomosis. The aim of this multicenter study is to investigate whether 3D vision offers any advantages on surgical performance over 2D vision during TLRC. All data of consecutive patients who underwent elective TLRC for cancer at three Italian surgical centers with either 2D or 3D technology from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrieved from a computer-maintained database. A case-matched analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method was performed. After matching, a total of 106 patients were analyzed with 53 patients in each group. Mean operative time was significantly longer for 2D-TLRC than for 3D-TLRC (153.2 ± 52.4 vs. 131 ± 51 min, p = 0.029) and a statistically significant difference in anastomosing time (p = 0.032, 19.2 ± 5.9 min vs. 21.7 ± 6.2 min for 3D and 2D group, respectively) was also recorded. No difference in the median number of harvested nodes (23 ± 11 vs. 21 ± 7 for 3D and 2D group, respectively; p = 0.48) was found. Neither intraoperative complications nor conversions occurred in the two groups. In conclusion, 3D vision appears to improve the performance of a TLRC by reducing operative time and making intracorporeal anastomosis easier. Prospective randomized studies are required to determine the real beneficial effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Bracale
- Department of General Surgery and Specialities, School of Medecine Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 7th Building, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Merola
- Department of General Surgery and Specialities, School of Medecine Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 7th Building, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonia Rizzuto
- Medical and Surgical Science, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro Medical School, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pontecorvi
- Department of General Surgery and Specialities, School of Medecine Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 7th Building, Naples, Italy
| | - Vania Silvestri
- Department of General Surgery and Specialities, School of Medecine Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 7th Building, Naples, Italy
| | - Giusto Pignata
- Department of General Surgery II, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- Department of General Surgery, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Diego Cuccurullo
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedali dei Colli Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Sciuto
- Department of General Surgery, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of General Surgery and Specialities, School of Medecine Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 7th Building, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2020; 270:762-767. [PMID: 31592811 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to determine whether there are clinically relevant differences in outcomes between laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) with intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (IIA) and LRC with extracorporeal IA (EIA). BACKGROUND IIA and EIA are 2 well-established techniques for restoration of bowel continuity after LRC. There are no high-quality studies demonstrating the superiority of one anastomotic technique over the other. METHODS This is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of LRC with IIA and LRC with EIA in patients with a benign or malignant right-sided colon neoplasm. Primary endpoint was length of hospital stay (LOS). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03045107. RESULTS A total of 140 patients were randomized and analyzed. Median operative time was comparable in IIA versus EIA group {130 [interquartile range (IQR) 105-195] vs 130 (IQR 110-180) min; P = 0.770} and no intraoperative complications occurred. The quicker recovery of bowel function after IIA than EIA [gas: 2 (IQR 2-3) vs 3 (IQR 2-3) days, P = 0.003; stool: 4 (IQR 3-5) vs 4.5 (IQR 3-5) days, P = 0.032] was not reflected in any advantage in the primary endpoint: median LOS was similar in the 2 groups [6 (IQR 5-7) vs 6 (IQR 5-8) days; P = 0.839]. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes harvested, length of skin incision, 30-day morbidity (17.1% vs 15.7%, P = 0.823), reoperation rate, and readmission rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS LRC with IIA is associated with earlier recovery of postoperative bowel function than LRC with EIA; however, it does not reflect into a shorter LOS.
Collapse
|
18
|
Dirie NI, Wang Q, Wang S. Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol 2019; 32:781-790. [PMID: 29969912 PMCID: PMC6156697 DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is widely used in the urological field. This systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to assess the clinical and surgical efficacy of the three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic system in comparison with two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy for treatment of different urological conditions. METHODS Following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic literature search in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBase was carried out to identify relevant studies published up to May 2018. Articles published in the English language of both randomized and observational studies comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic systems in urological surgeries were included. Level of evidence and quality assessments of all included studies were conducted. Interested data were extracted for comparison and meta-analysis. RESULTS Our literature search generated 17 studies comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopic systems in different urological surgeries. Of these, 13 studies containing 548 and 449 patients operated on with 2D and 3D laparoscopic systems, respectively, were included for meta-analysis. These 13 studies were divided into three groups according to surgical type. Group 1: Partial nephrectomy (PN); operative time (p = 0.19), estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.51), dissecting time (p = 0.58), and suturing time (p = 0.28) were not statistically significant between 2D and 3D laparoscopic systems. However, warm ischemia time during PN was significantly shorter during 3D laparoscopy (p < 0.00001). Group 2: Pyeloplasty; this procedure showed no significant difference between the two systems. Group 3: Radical prostatectomy (RP); shorter operative time (p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (p = 0.001) were associated with the 3D laparoscopic system. CONCLUSION Three-dimensional laparoscopy mainly improves the depth of perception, leading to better visibility, which is important for some complex urological surgeries such as PN, pyeloplasty, and RP. Based on our findings, 3D laparoscopy seems to provide better clinical and surgical outcomes in some urological procedures compared with conventional 2D laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najib Isse Dirie
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zwart MJW, Fuente I, Hilst J, de Rooij T, van Dieren S, van Rijssen LB, Schijven MP, Busch ORC, Luyer MD, Lips DJ, Festen S, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Added value of 3D-vision during laparoscopic biotissue pancreatico- and hepaticojejunostomy (LAELAPS 3D2D): an international randomized cross-over trial. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1087-1094. [PMID: 31080087 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear what the added value is of 3D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary surgery. 3D-laparoscopy could improve procedure time and/or surgical performance, for instance in demanding anastomoses such as pancreatico- and hepaticojejunostomy. The impact of 3D-laparoscopy could be negligible in more experienced surgeons. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled cross-over trial including 20 expert laparoscopic surgeons and 20 surgical residents from 9 countries (Argentina, Estonia, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, UK, USA). All participants performed a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) using 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy on biotissue organ models according to the Pittsburgh method. Primary endpoint was the time required to complete both anastomoses. Secondary endpoint was the objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS; range 12-60) rating. Observers were blinded for 3D/2D and expertise. RESULTS A total of 40 participants completed 144 PJs and HJs. 3D-laparoscopy reduced the operative time with 15.5 min (95%CI 10.2-24.5 min), from 81.0 to 64.4 min, p = 0.001. This reduction was observed for both experts and residents (13.0 vs 22.2 min, intergroup significance p = 0.354). The OSATS improved with 5.1 points, SD ± 6.3, with 3D-laparoscopy, p = 0.001. This improvement was observed for both experts and residents (4.6 vs 5.6 points, p = 0.519). Of all participants, 37/39 participants stated to prefer 3D laparoscopy whereas 14/39 reported side effects. Minor side effects were reported by 10/39 participants whereas 2/39 participants reported severe side effects (both severe eye strain). CONCLUSION 3D-laparoscopy, as compared to 2D-laparoscopy, reduced the operative time and improved surgical performance for PJ and HJ anastomoses in both experts and residents with mostly minor side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice J W Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Ignacio Fuente
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jony Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thijs de Rooij
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart B van Rijssen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schwab KE, Curtis NJ, Whyte MB, Smith RV, Rockall TA, Ballard K, Jourdan IC. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1745-1753. [PMID: 31312963 PMCID: PMC7093411 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06961-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Contemporary 3D platforms have overcome past deficiencies. Available trainee and laboratory
studies suggest stereoscopic imaging improves performance but there is little clinical data or studies assessing specialists. We aimed to determine whether stereoscopic (3D) laparoscopic systems reduce operative time and number of intraoperative errors during specialist-performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods A parallel arm (1:1) randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D passive-polarised laparoscopic systems in day-case LC using was performed. Eleven consultant surgeons that had each performed > 200 LC (including > 10 3D LC) participated. Cases were video recorded and a four-point difficulty grade applied. The primary outcome was overall operative time. Subtask time and the number of intraoperative consequential errors as identified by two blinded assessors using a hierarchical task analysis and the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique formed secondary endpoints. Results 112 patients were randomised. There was no difference in operative time between 2D and 3D LC (23:14 min (± 10:52) vs. 20:17 (± 9:10), absolute difference − 14.6%, p = 0.148) although 3D surgery was significantly quicker in difficulty grade 3 and 4 cases (30:23 min (± 9:24), vs. 18:02 (± 7:56), p < 0.001). No differences in overall error count was seen (total 47, median 1, range 0–4 vs. 45, 1, 0–3, p = 0.62) although there were significantly fewer 3D gallbladder perforations (15 vs. 6, p = 0.034). Conclusion 3D laparoscopy did not reduce overall operative time or error frequency in laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by specialist surgeons. 3D reduced Calot’s dissection time and operative time in complex cases as well as the incidence of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation (NCT01930344). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-06961-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie E Schwab
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, UK. .,Department of Surgery, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, UK.
| | - Nathan J Curtis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London, UK.,Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK
| | | | - Ralph V Smith
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, UK.,Department of Surgery, Frimley Park Hospital, Portsmouth Rd, Frimley, UK
| | - Timothy A Rockall
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, UK.,Department of General Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Iain C Jourdan
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aykan S, Temiz MZ, Duymaz T, Ural IH, Colakerol A, Muslumanoglu AY, Semercioz A. Effects of the Three-Dimensional Vision System on Surgical Performance, Muscular Fatigue, and Pain During Urologic Laparoscopic Tasks: Results of Objective Assessments and a Mini Questionnaire Survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:346-352. [PMID: 30136883 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The three-dimensional (3D) vision system was released to the medical market to improve laparoscopic outcomes. We analyzed the muscular pain and fatigue, and the performance outcomes after several laparoscopic urologic tasks were completed with the 3D vision system. METHODS A total of 49 participants with different surgical expertise levels were enrolled in the study. All the participants performed some laparoscopic urologic tasks using two-dimensional (2D) and 3D vision systems separately. A mini questionnaire survey was also completed by the participants. The duration and quality of the tasks and the muscular fatigue and pain were objectively determined. All the parameters were compared between the 2D and 3D systems. RESULTS Although all the tasks were completed in significantly shorter times with the 3D vision system in each expertise level, maximal shortening was seen in the residents. The overall quality scores were significantly higher with the 3D vision system. However, a maximal increase was seen in the residents. The muscular pain of the participants was lower with 3D vision system. The overall handgrip strength significantly increased from 41.2 to 42.4 kg after the tasks with the 3D vision system, but the difference was significant in only the residents. Twenty-seven participants (56.2%) declared that the 3D system contributed to their performance, and most of the participants (83.3%) preferred the 3D system in the questionnaire survey. CONCLUSION 3D technology may be effective for use in urologic laparoscopic training programs of novice surgeons. It may also contribute to the skills of specialists and experts, shortening the surgical time, which may decrease the surgical morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Aykan
- 1 Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Tomris Duymaz
- 3 Department of physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Halil Ural
- 4 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aykut Colakerol
- 5 Department of Urology, Sancaktepe Martyr Professor Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Atilla Semercioz
- 1 Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3370-3383. [PMID: 30656453 PMCID: PMC6722156 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer has been questioned. 3D laparoscopic systems are suggested to aid optimal surgical performance but have not been evaluated in advanced procedures. We hypothesised that stereoscopic imaging could improve the performance of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS A multicentre developmental randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D laparoscopic TME was performed (ISRCTN59485808). Trial surgeons were colorectal consultants that had completed their TME proficiency curve and underwent stereoscopic visual testing. Patients requiring elective laparoscopic TME with curative intent were centrally randomised (1:1) to 2D or 3D using Karl Storz IMAGE1 S D3-Link™ and 10-mm TIPCAM®1S 3D passive polarising laparoscopic systems. Outcomes were enacted adverse events as assessed by the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique, intraoperative data, 30-day patient outcomes, histopathological specimen assessment and surgeon cognitive load. RESULTS 88 patients were included. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics, surgeon stereopsis, case difficulty, cognitive load, operative time, blood loss or conversion between the trial arms. 1377 intraoperative adverse events were identified (median 18 per case, IQR 14-21, range 2-49) with no differences seen between the 2D and 3D arms (18 (95% CI 17-21) vs. 17 (95% CI 16-19), p = 0.437). 3D laparoscopy had non-significantly higher mesorectal fascial plane resections (94 vs. 77%, p = 0.059; OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.05-1.16)) but equal lymph node yield and circumferential margin distance and involvement. 30-day morbidity, anastomotic leak, re-operation, length of stay and readmission rates were equal between the 2D and 3D arms. CONCLUSION Feasibility of performing multicentre 3D laparoscopic multicentre trials of specialist performed complex procedures is shown. 3D imaging did not alter the number of intraoperative adverse events; however, a potential improvement in mesorectal specimen quality was observed and should form the focus of future 3D laparoscopic TME trials.
Collapse
|
23
|
The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 2018. [PMID: 30515610 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of 3D laparoscopic systems is expanding. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community. METHODS Systematic reviews of the PubMed and Embase libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of 3D on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by an international surgical and engineering expert panel which were presented and voted at the EAES annual congress, London, May 2018. RESULTS 9967 abstracts were screened with 138 articles included. 18 statements and two recommendations were generated and approved. 3D significantly shortened operative time (mean difference 11 min (8% [95% CI 20.29-1.72], I2 96%)). A significant reduction in complications was observed when 3D systems were used (RR 0.75, [95 CI% 0.60-0.94], I2 0%) particularly for cases involving laparoscopic suturing (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35-0.90], I2 0%). In 69 box trainer or simulator studies, 64% concluded trainees were significant faster and 62% performed fewer errors when using 3D. CONCLUSION We recommend the use of 3D vision in laparoscopy to reduce the operative time (grade of recommendation: low). Future robust clinical research is required to specifically investigate the potential benefit of 3D laparoscopy system on complication rates (grade of recommendation: high).
Collapse
|
24
|
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, Arolfo S, Barberio M, Boni L, Brodie R, Bouvy N, Cassinotti E, Carus T, Checcucci E, Custers P, Diana M, Jansen M, Jaspers J, Marom G, Momose K, Müller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Perretta S, Porpiglia F, Sánchez-Margallo F, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Schijven M, Silecchia G, Passera R, Mintz Y. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:3251-3274. [PMID: 30515610 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of 3D laparoscopic systems is expanding. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community. METHODS Systematic reviews of the PubMed and Embase libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of 3D on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by an international surgical and engineering expert panel which were presented and voted at the EAES annual congress, London, May 2018. RESULTS 9967 abstracts were screened with 138 articles included. 18 statements and two recommendations were generated and approved. 3D significantly shortened operative time (mean difference 11 min (8% [95% CI 20.29-1.72], I2 96%)). A significant reduction in complications was observed when 3D systems were used (RR 0.75, [95 CI% 0.60-0.94], I2 0%) particularly for cases involving laparoscopic suturing (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35-0.90], I2 0%). In 69 box trainer or simulator studies, 64% concluded trainees were significant faster and 62% performed fewer errors when using 3D. CONCLUSION We recommend the use of 3D vision in laparoscopy to reduce the operative time (grade of recommendation: low). Future robust clinical research is required to specifically investigate the potential benefit of 3D laparoscopy system on complication rates (grade of recommendation: high).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy.
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- Montichiari Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Nader K Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK
| | - Marco Augusto Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy
| | - Nathan J Curtis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, ESUT Research Group, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Arolfo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy
| | - Manuel Barberio
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ronit Brodie
- Department of Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nicole Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Carus
- Department of Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, ESUT Research Group, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Torino, Italy
| | - Petra Custers
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michele Diana
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marilou Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris Jaspers
- Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gadi Marom
- Department of Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kota Momose
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- General-, Visceral-and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kyokazu Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Felix Nickel
- General-, Visceral-and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Silvana Perretta
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, ESUT Research Group, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Marlies Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 3D laparoscopy is currently under intensive discussion. At the moment the majority of newly acquired laparoscopy systems include the 3D technique. New 4K systems, which will be offered in combination with 3D, are complicating the decision-making when buying new laparoscopic systems. The aim of the article is to show the advantages and possible limitations of 3D laparoscopy. Furthermore, the position of 3D laparoscopy in the current video market is evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was based on an up to date literature search in PubMed. Concerning the question whether the 3D is replacing the 2D laparoscopy, observations from the industry and a personal evaluation were included in the analysis. RESULTS The current studies show clear advantages of 3D laparoscopy concerning operation time, efficiency and workload. A major proportion of the studies were conducted on simulation trainers; however, some clinical trials also confirmed these results. The learning curve in laparoscopic surgery is clearly improved with the 3D technique and 3D also seems be useful for operations by experts. The limitation is that not every surgeon can see three dimensionally. Furthermore, the set-up in the operation room needs to be optimized so that a 3D system can be successfully implemented with the nursing staff and side effects, such as exhaustion, dizziness or headache can be prevented. CONCLUSION The choice of video system will depend on the personal interest of the surgeon and the ability to see 3D. It can be assumed that the majority of the systems will include 3D laparoscopy but 2D laparoscopy will not be completely replaced. A dynamic development of 3D in association with 4K and robotics can be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Buia
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Asklepios Kliniken Langen, Röntgenstr. 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland
| | - S Farkas
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden, Beethovenstraße 20, 65189, Wiesbaden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|