Linear vs. circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Comparative analysis of linear- and circular-stapled gastrojejunostomies in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a focus on postoperative morbidity using the comprehensive complication index

PURPOSE

The linear-stapled (LSA) and the circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) are the two most commonly performed techniques for the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study compared the outcome after both techniques with special focus on postoperative morbidity using the comprehensive complication index (CCI).

METHODS

Five hundred eighty-eight patients operated between 01/2010 and 12/2019 were included in the final analysis and divided in two cohorts according to the surgical technique of the GJ (LSA (n = 290) or CSA (n = 298)). Before 09/2016, the CSA was exclusively performed for the GJ, while after 09/2016, the LSA was solely used.

RESULTS

The mean CCI for patients with Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ 2 within the first 90 days after RYGB was 31 ± 9.1 in the CSA and 25.7 ± 6.8 in the LSA group (p < 0.001), both values still below the previously published benchmark cutoff (≤ 33.73). The C-reactive Protein (CRP)-levels on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3 as well as the use of opioids on POD 1 were significantly higher in the CSA- than in the LSA-group (all p < 0.001). There were significantly more internal herniations in the CSA group during the first 24 postoperative months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients after RYGB with CSA were found to have higher CCI values during the first 90 PODs compared to patients in which the LSA was applied. To achieve optimal outcomes in terms of patient morbidity, the LSA seems to be the superior technique for GJ in RYGB.

Transition from a circular to a linear stapling protocol in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery and its impact on quality of life: a 5-year outcome study

PURPOSE

Surgical technique in bariatric surgery has been refined over the past decades. This study analysed the effect of changing the stapling protocol on the quality of life (QoL) at a midterm follow-up.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between June 2012 and March 2016. Patients were stratified into the circular stapling protocol (CSP, n = 117) or the linear stapling protocol (LSP, n = 118). QoL was quantified by the Moorehead score at 12, 24 and 60 months. Multivariate testing was used to identify confounders.

RESULTS

The age was 42.8 ± 11.5 years and the body mass index (BMI) was 43.8 ± 6.2 kg/m², with no baseline intergroup differences. Overall baseline Moorehead score was 0.42 ± 1.1 and improved in both groups after 12 months (1.97 ± 0.74, p < 0.001), 24 months (1.86 ± 0.79, p < 0.001) and 60 months (1.71 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). LSP was associated with improved Moorehead score after 60 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.251, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.48, p = 0.010). Overall, a drop of mean BMI occurred and this effect lasted throughout the observation period (- 12.48 kg/m², p < 0.001). More profound BMI reduction was further positively associated with Moorehead scores after 24 and after 60 months (OR 0.97, p = 0.028; OR 0.96, p = 0.007). Complications, rehospitalisations and reoperations were more frequent in the CSP group (50% vs 23.7%, p < 0.001; 39.7% vs 22.9%, p = 0.009; 37.1% vs 18.6%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The CSP and LSP achieve a long-lasting increase in QoL, although the LSP is associated with fewer complications, persistent weight loss and improved Moorehead score. Therefore, the LSP might be considered the favourable protocol in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Incidence and risk factors for early gastrojejunostomy anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic intervention following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a MBSAQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture is one of the most commonly recognized complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The risks involving the formation of early GJ stomal stenosis are largely unknown. The aims of this study are to evaluate the rate and risk factors associated with GJ stricture in patients requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 30 days after LRYGB.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EGD for GJ stricture following LRYGB. Data were retrieved from MBSAQIP database from 2015 to 2018. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Those who had reoperation, readmission, and intervention for other indications rather than GJ stricture were excluded from the risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

760,076 patients underwent bariatric surgery. Of these, 184,660 (24.3%) underwent LRYGB and 875 had GJ stricture within 30 days postoperatively. The overall incidence of early GJ stricture after LRYGB was 4.7 per 1000 person-years. The incidence decreased from 6.2 to 3.4 per 1000 person-years during the 4-year period. 85% of patients with GJ stricture required therapeutic intervention. Median (IQR) day to the first endoscopic intervention was 25 (21-28) days. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 40%. 30-day reoperation rate due to GJ stricture was 5.6%. No 30-day mortality occurred. Factors independently associated with an increased risk for early GJ stricture include concurrent hiatal hernia repair (Adjusted Odds Ratio-AOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.2), revision case (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), African American (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), gastroesophageal reflux disease-GERD (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), drain placement (AOR 1.3, 95% CI1.1-1.4), and routine postoperative swallow study (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.50).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of early GJ stricture following LRYGB decreased at MBSAQIP-accredited centers over the review period. Patients having additional manipulation at or around GJ were at risk of developing early GJ stricture after LRYGB.

Linear Versus Circular Laparoscopic Gastrojejunal Anastomosis of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Comparative Studies

PURPOSE

To compare the rate of complications of linear versus circular gastrojejunal anastomosis of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was carried out using the terms "laparoscopic," "circular," "linear," "anastomosis," "gastric bypass" in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Only original articles in English language comparing linear versus circular anastomosis were included. No temporal interval was set. Outcome measures were wound infection, bleeding, marginal ulcer, leak, and stricture. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles (7 prospective and 15 retrospective) out of 184 retrieved papers were included in this study. The pooled analysis showed a reduced odd of wound infection and bleeding after linear anastomosis. Likelihood of marginal ulcer, leak, and stricture was similar after the 2 techniques. Wound infection was reported in 15 studies (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45; P=0.0003; I2=91), bleeding in 9 (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.59; P=0.00001; I2=6) marginal ulcer in 11 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26-1.41; P=0.25; I2=65), leaks in 15 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21-1.67; P=0.34; I2=83) and stricture in 18 (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-1.00; P=0.05; I2=68).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic RYGB can be safely performed both with circular and linear staplers. Rates of wound infection and bleeding were significantly lower after linear gastrojejunal anastomosis.

Variation of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Techniques: a Survey of 518 Bariatric Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

Surgical technique varies dramatically in the performance of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and these differences can potentially lead to variation in outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize surgical techniques used during LRYGB.

METHODS

An anonymous 44-question survey was distributed by email to all bariatric surgeons with membership in the ASMBS, SAGES, and ACS from April to June 2020. Questions were designed to evaluate surgeon demographics, experience, and variation of techniques. Only surgeons who performed LRYGB within the past year were included for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 534 (18.8%) surgeons responded and the majority (97.0%) reported performing LRYGB in the past year. Surgeons were predominantly from the USA (77.8%). For preoperative work-up, 20.1% performed upper gastrointestinal series while 60.8% performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Limb length evaluation revealed mean Roux and biliopancreatic limb lengths of 124.1 ± 29.4 cm and 67.4 ± 32.2 cm, respectively. The gastrojejunostomy was most commonly formed using a linear stapler with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (53.1%) and the jejunojejunostomy using a linear stapled anastomotic technique with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (60.6%). The majority of surgeons closed the jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect (91.1%) and one of the antecolic or retrocolic mesenteric defects (65.1%). Intraoperative leak tests were performed in 95.9% of cases. Only 22.1% of surgeons routinely performed upper gastrointestinal swallow studies postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

There are wide variations in pre- and intraoperative practice patterns for LRYGB. Further clinical trials designed to evaluate the impact of these practice pattern differences on patient outcomes are warranted.

Improved Clinical and Financial Outcomes in Proximal Gastric Bypass Surgery Following the Transition from a Conventional Circular Stapling to an Augmented Linear Stapling Protocol

Bariatric techniques for bypass surgery evolve constantly. Switching from one well-established protocol to another in a running surgical teaching program is challenging. We analyzed clinical and financial outcomes at a single bariatric center transitioning from circular to an augmented linear bypass protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 454 patients were included in this retrospective study. The circular bypass protocol (CIRC; n = 177) was used between 2011 and 2012. Between 2013 and 2015 the transition occurred. Thereafter, the augmented linear protocol (aLIN; n = 277) was primarily utilized.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean preoperative BMI dropped from 42.2 to 29.6 kg/m² after 5 years with no difference between groups. Operation times were significantly shorter in the aLIN vs. CIRC group at 108 (± 32) vs. 120 (± 34) min (P < 0.001), respectively. The reoperation rate was significantly higher in the CIRC vs. aLIN group at n = 65 (36%) vs. n = 35 (13%; P < 0.001), respectively. Specifically, revision due to internal hernia occurred much more frequently in the CIRC-group, n = 36 (20%) vs. n = 12 (4%; P < 0.001). Moreover, reoperation rates for gastrojejunostomy leakage and endoscopic dilatations for anastomotic stenosis were higher in the CIRC vs. aLIN group (P < 0.001). Adjusted overall mean cost per case was lower in aLIN-patients at 15,403 (± 7848) vs. CIRC-patients at 18,525 (± 7850) Swiss francs (P < 0.001). Overall profit was 2555 ± 4768 vs. 1455 ± 5638 Swiss francs in the aLIN vs. CIRC-group, respectively (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

This study shows improved clinical and financial outcomes after a gradual transition from a circular stapling protocol to an augmented linear stapling protocol in proximal gastric bypass surgery.

Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Stricture Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an Analysis of Anastomotic Technique at a Single Institution

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are at risk of developing strictures of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). Several variables can affect this, one of which may be the method of anastomosis. Between 2010 and 2014, our institution utilized three different anastomotic techniques for creating the GJA (25 mm end-to-end circular-stapled (CS), linear-stapled (LS), and robotic hand sewn (HS)). Our objectives were to compare the method of GJA relative to the subsequent development of anastomotic stricture.

METHODS

We queried our electronic health record for all patients who underwent an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB (2010-2014). Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, weight loss, complications, interventions, and revisions of the GJA.

RESULTS

In total, 1112 RYGB were performed at our institute, and 17.4% of patients (194/1112) had an upper endoscopy (EGD). Overall, 3.1% (34/1112) were found to have a stricture of the GJA. Patients undergoing a CS, LS, and HS anastomosis had GJA stricture rates of 4.9%, 0.5%, and 1.2% respectively (CS to LS (p < 0.05), p = NS among CS vs. HS, and LS vs. HS). The rate of GJA revision was 1.5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (p = NS). In patients who had an EGD, excess BMI loss was 57.4%, 64.6%, and 59.2% (p = NS). In patients symptomatic from strictures, excess BMI loss was 69.4%, 83%, and 63.5% respectively (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

The anastomotic technique for creating of the GJA may impact the formation of strictures. Based on our experience, gastrojejunostomies created with a 2-mm EEA-stapling technique are at higher risk of strictures.

Impacts of Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique on Rates of Marginal Ulcer Formation and Anastomotic Bleeding Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Marginal ulceration (MU) and bleeding are possible complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our institution utilizes three techniques for performing the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA), providing a means to compare postoperative MU and bleeding as it relates to GJA technique.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to analyze the incidence of MU and bleeding between the 25-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, linear stapler (LS), and robotic hand-sewn (RHS) GJA techniques.

METHODS

Electronic health records for all patients who had an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB were queried (2010-2014). Charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, complications, endoscopic interventions, and smoking and NSAID use.

RESULTS

Out of 1112 RYGBs, the GJA was created using an EEA, LS, or RHS approach in 58.6%, 33.6%, and 7.7% of patients, respectively. 17.4% had an EGD (19.9% EEA, 13.9% LS, and 14.0% RHS). Incidence of MU was 7.3% (9.3% EEA, 4.8% LS, and 5.8% RHS). Rates of EGD and MU were significantly higher after EEA vs. LS GJA (p<0.05). The bleeding rate was 1.5%, [1.1% EEA, 2.1% LS, and 2.3% RHS (p=NS)]. MU within 90 days of RYGB occurred in 4.1%, 0.8%, and 4.7%, respectively (p<0.05 for EEA vs LS only). NSAID and cigarette use were identified in 29.3%, 38.9%, and 60% and 17.2%, 22.2%, and 20%, respectively, for the EEA, LS, and RHS GJA (p=NS).

CONCLUSION

The method of GJA has an impact on rate of MU formation. A GJA fashioned with a 25-mm EEA stapler tends to have higher rates of EGD and MU.

Comparison of gastrojejunostomy techniques and anastomotic complications: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

There are several ways to perform the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Surgeons typically use a variation of three techniques: Hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA), Linear stapled (LS) and Circular stapled anastomosis (CSA). The purpose of this literature review is to determine which of the GJ techniques, if any, is superior and results in the least amount of postoperative complications, with a specific focus on rates of marginal ulcers, postoperative bleeding, and strictures.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were consulted for studies on LRYGB procedures utilizing a GJ anastomosis, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Cochrane and PRISMA screening methods were used to select the studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies published between 2015 and 2019 were selected and included 135,899 patients that underwent LRYGB with a GJ anastomosis. Sample sizes ranged from 114 to 49,331 patients. Four studies reported that CSA had statistically significant higher rates of marginal ulcers when compared to HSA and LS techniques. Three studies concluded that CSA had statistically significant higher rates of postoperative bleeding when compared to HSA and LS. Five studies observed that CSA had statistically significant higher rates of strictures when compared to HSA and LS techniques. There was no consensus whether HSA or LS was superior in terms of reduced postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed statistically significant increases in rates of postoperative bleeding, marginal ulcer, and strictures with the use of mechanical circular staplers at the GJ anastomosis in LRYGB. Based on our results, avoiding the use of mechanical circular staplers can result in fewer postoperative complications. Nevertheless, there are limitations to retrospective studies which may influence the results and therefore a randomized controlled trial directly comparing HSA, CSA, and LS should be performed to truly determine which technique is superior.

Linear versus Circular Stapler for Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of 211 Cases

Purpose

Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a frequently performed bariatric procedure, there is still no consensus on its technical implementation.

Methods

211 patients treated with LRYGB in a single institution between March 2011 and October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. A subgroup analysis for the linear (LSA) versus circular stapler technique (CSA) for gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) was performed to evaluate complications and outcomes.

Results

128 (60.6%) patients received GJA with CSA and 83 (39.4%) with LSA. Average weight loss one year after surgery, respectively, BMI after one year of follow-up (kg/m²), showed no significant difference. Median surgery time was significantly shorter in the LSA group. If the procedure was performed with CSA, significantly more wound infections occurred.

Conclusions

Both the circular and the linear stapler techniques for gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are safe methods with comparable outcomes. A disadvantage of CSA is the significantly higher rate of wound infections, a circumstance which requires increased attention.

Is it the technique or wound protection that is key to reducing wound infections in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures?

INTRODUCTION

An unusually high surgical site infection (SSI) rate after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was noted on routine outcomes review. Surgeon A, who had a rate of 8.9%, utilized the transoral technique (passage down esophagus into gastric pouch) for anvil insertion for the circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy. By comparison, SSI rate was 0% for Surgeon B, who inserted anvil transabdominally (direct passage into stomach via gastrotomy) and used wound protection (wound protector and plastic drape over stapler). We sought to determine if it was the technique for anvil insertion (transoral or transabdominal) or use of wound protection that could help reduce SSIs.

METHODS

In mid-2017, Surgeon A added wound protection (wound protector and plastic drape over stapler) to the transoral technique to minimize oral flora wound contamination. Surgeon B made no changes. In this study, wound-related outcomes are examined, comparing patients who underwent surgery before (Group 1) versus after (Group 2) this intervention. Statistical analysis performed utilizing t tests and Chi square analysis; p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-three patients underwent RYGB. Group 1 consisted of 182 patients over 17 months; 151 patients over 13 months were in Group 2. Groups were similar in age, BMI, gender, and prevalence of diabetes. There was a decrease in SSIs between Group 1 and Group 2 (5 vs. 0, p = 0.04). 11 wound complications occurred in Group 1 (5 SSIs, 4 seromas and 2 hematomas); whereas 2 wound complications occurred in Group 2 (1 seroma and 1 hematoma); decrease from 6 to 1.3%, p = 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that changing technique can lead to best outcomes. There was a dramatic reduction of wound complications and complete elimination of SSIs with a change in operative technique. The higher risk of SSI with the transoral anvil insertion when preforming a circular-stapled anastomosis can be mitigated with use of wound protection.