1
|
Brown WA, Liem R, Al-Sabah S, Anvari M, Boza C, Cohen RV, Ghaferi A, Våge V, Himpens J, Kow L, Morton J, Musella M, Pattou F, Sakran N, Clapp B, Prager G, Shikora S. Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Across the IFSO Chapters: Key Insights on the Baseline Patient Demographics, Procedure Types, and Mortality from the Eighth IFSO Global Registry Report. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1764-1777. [PMID: 38592648 PMCID: PMC11031475 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07196-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The International Federation for Surgery for Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry aims to provide descriptive data about the caseload and penetrance of surgery for metabolic disease and obesity in member countries. The data presented in this report represent the key findings of the eighth report of the IFSO Global Registry. METHODS All existing Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) registries known to IFSO were invited to contribute to the eighth report. Aggregated data was provided by each MBS registry to the team at the Australia and New Zealand Bariatric Surgery Registry (ANZBSR) and was securely stored on a Redcap™ database housed at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Data was checked for completeness and analyzed by the IFSO Global Registry Committee. Prior to the finalization of the report, all graphs were circulated to contributors and to the global registry committee of IFSO to ensure data accuracy. RESULTS Data was received from 24 national and 2 regional registries, providing information on 502,150 procedures. The most performed primary MBS procedure was sleeve gastrectomy, whereas the most performed revisional MBS procedure was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Asian countries reported people with lower BMI undergoing MBS along with higher rates of diabetes. Mortality was a rare event. CONCLUSION Registries enable meaningful comparisons between countries on the demographics, characteristics, operation types and approaches, and trends in MBS procedures. Reported outcomes can be seen as flags of potential issues or relationships that could be studied in more detail in specific research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy A Brown
- Department of Surgery, Australia and New Zealand Bariatric Surgery Registry, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
| | - Ronald Liem
- Dutch Audit for the Treatment of Obesity, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Salman Al-Sabah
- Department of Surgery, Kuwait University (Kuwait Bariatric Surgery Registry), Kuwait, Kuwait
| | | | - Camilo Boza
- Bariatric Surgery Center, Clinica MEDS (Chilean Bariatric Surgery Registry), Santiago, Chile
| | - Ricardo V Cohen
- The Center for the treatment of Obesity and Diabetes - COD Hospital Oswaldo Cruz (Brazilian Registry), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Amir Ghaferi
- Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Villy Våge
- Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry Norway (SOReg-N), Helse Bergen Health Trust, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lilian Kow
- Department GI Surgery, Flinders University South Australia (Australian and New Zealand Bariatric Surgery Registry), Adelaide, Australia
| | - John Morton
- Yale School of Medicine (MBSAQIP- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project), New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department (Italian Registry), Naples "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Francois Pattou
- University of Lille, Integrated Center for Obesity, CHU Lille, Inserm,, Institut Pasteur Lille (SOFFCO-MM Registry), Lille, France
| | - Nasser Sakran
- Department of General Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine Safed, Bar-Ilan University (Israelian Registry), Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Benjamin Clapp
- Paul L Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA
| | - Gerhard Prager
- Universitätsklinik Für Allgemeinchirurgie, Vienna, Austria
| | - Scott Shikora
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (MBSAQIP), Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallucci P, Marincola G, Pennestrì F, Procopio PF, Prioli F, Salvi G, Ciccoritti L, Greco F, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Franzese A, Mansi F, Uccelli M, Cesana G, Musella M, Olmi S, Raffaelli M. One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OABG) vs. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) as revisional procedure following Sleeve Gastrectomy: results of a multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:128. [PMID: 38627302 PMCID: PMC11021266 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03306-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is the most performed bariatric surgery, but a considerable number of patients may require revisional procedures for suboptimal clinical response/recurrence of weight (SCR/RoW). Conversion options include One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI). The study aims to compare SADI vs. OAGB as revisional procedures in terms of early and mid-term complications, operative time, postoperative hospital stay and clinical outcomes. METHODS All patients who underwent OAGB or SADI as revisional procedures following SG for SCR/RoW at three high-volume bariatric centers between January 2014 and April 2021 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-eight patients were identified. After PSM, the two groups included 42 OAGB and 42 SADI patients. Early (≤ 30 days) postoperative complications rate did not differ significantly between OAGB and SADI groups (3 bleedings vs. 0, p = 0.241). Mid-term (within 2 years) complications rate was significantly higher in the OAGB group (21.4% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.007), mainly anastomotic complications and reflux disease (12% of OAGBs). Seven OAGB patients required conversion to another procedure (Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-RYGB) vs. none among the SADI patients (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS SADI and OAGB are both effective as revisional procedures for SCR/RoW after SG. OAGB is associated with a significantly higher rate of mid-term complications and a not negligible rate of conversion (RYGB). Larger studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Gallucci
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Marincola
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennestrì
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Centro Di Ricerca In Chirurgia Delle Ghiandole Endocrine E Dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Priscilla Francesca Procopio
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro Di Ricerca In Chirurgia Delle Ghiandole Endocrine E Dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Prioli
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Salvi
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro Di Ricerca In Chirurgia Delle Ghiandole Endocrine E Dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Ciccoritti
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Ospedale Universitario Federico II, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Ospedale Universitario Federico II, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franzese
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Ospedale Universitario Federico II, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Mansi
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Ospedale Universitario Federico II, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Uccelli
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Oncologica, Centro Di Chirurgia Laparoscopica E Bariatrica, Policlinico San Marco, Gruppo San Donato, Zingonia, BG, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cesana
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Oncologica, Centro Di Chirurgia Laparoscopica E Bariatrica, Policlinico San Marco, Gruppo San Donato, Zingonia, BG, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Ospedale Universitario Federico II, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale Ed Oncologica, Centro Di Chirurgia Laparoscopica E Bariatrica, Policlinico San Marco, Gruppo San Donato, Zingonia, BG, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Centro Dipartimentale Di Chirurgia Endocrina E Dell'Obesità, U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina E Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro Di Ricerca In Chirurgia Delle Ghiandole Endocrine E Dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallo A, D'alisa R, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Guerra S, Berardi G, Vitale SG, Palumbo M, Cretella P, Angioni S, Bifulco G, Musella M. Hysteroscopy and weight loss in treatment of endometrial cancer: case report and literature review. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024; 33:109-119. [PMID: 38108527 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2294993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Fertility-sparing treatments have become important for young women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or endometrial carcinoma (EC) who wish to preserve their reproductive potential. Evidence indicates a strong relationship between weight and EC and the effect of weight loss on reducing the risk of EC. We report the case of a young obese woman with a body mass index (BMI) of 46.6 kg/m2, diagnosed with grade 2 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, who underwent a combined fertility-sparing treatment with hysteroscopic resection followed by insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system. After twelve months of failure to achieve a complete response, bariatric surgery was proposed to lose weight and improve the response to treatment. Histologic regression was achieved three months after surgery, with a weight loss of 30 kg and fifteen months after combined treatment of endometrial cancer. We reviewed the literature to summarize the evidence on the role of bariatric surgery and weight loss in modifying the oncologic and reproductive outcomes of women undergoing fertility-sparing treatment for atypical endometrial lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Gallo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Rossella D'alisa
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Serena Guerra
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mario Palumbo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Cretella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Pathology Unit, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Angioni
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ponce de Leon-Ballesteros G, Pouwels S, Romero-Velez G, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Bhandari M, Brown W, Copaescu C, De Luca M, Fobi M, Ghanem OM, Hasenberg T, Herrera MF, Herrera-Kok JH, Himpens J, Kow L, Kroh M, Kurian M, Musella M, Narwaria M, Noel P, Pantoja JP, Ponce J, Prager G, Ramos A, Ribeiro R, Ruiz-Ucar E, Salminen P, Shikora S, Small P, Stier C, Taha S, Taskin EH, Torres A, Vaz C, Vilallonga R, Verboonen S, Zerrweck C, Zundel N, Parmar C. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Obesity Class V (BMI > 60 kg/m 2): a Modified Delphi Study. Obes Surg 2024; 34:790-813. [PMID: 38238640 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06990-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the preferred method to achieve significant weight loss in patients with Obesity Class V (BMI > 60 kg/m2). However, there is no consensus regarding the best procedure(s) for this population. Additionally, these patients will likely have a higher risk of complications and mortality. The aim of this study was to achieve a consensus among a global panel of expert bariatric surgeons using a modified Delphi methodology. METHODS A total of 36 recognized opinion-makers and highly experienced metabolic and bariatric surgeons participated in the present Delphi consensus. 81 statements on preoperative management, selection of the procedure, perioperative management, weight loss parameters, follow-up, and metabolic outcomes were voted on in two rounds. A consensus was considered reached when an agreement of ≥ 70% of experts' votes was achieved. RESULTS A total of 54 out of 81 statements reached consensus. Remarkably, more than 90% of the experts agreed that patients should be notified of the greater risk of complications, the possibility of modifications to the surgical procedure, and the early start of chemical thromboprophylaxis. Regarding the choice of the procedure, SADI-S, RYGB, and OAGB were the top 3 preferred operations. However, no consensus was reached on the limb length in these operations. CONCLUSION This study represents the first attempt to reach consensus on the choice of procedures as well as perioperative management in patients with obesity class V. Although overall consensus was reached in different areas, more research is needed to better serve this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo Ponce de Leon-Ballesteros
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Angeles Morelia, Morelia, Postal: 331, Int. B-502, Av. Montaña Monarca, Montaña Monarca, 58350, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico.
| | - Sjaak Pouwels
- Department of General, Abdominal Surgery and Coloproctology, Helios St. Elisabeth Hospital, Oberhausen, NRW, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Ali Aminian
- Department of General Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luigi Angrisani
- Department of Public Health, Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Wendy Brown
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catalin Copaescu
- Department of Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Till Hasenberg
- Helios Obesity Center West, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Miguel F Herrera
- Clinic for Nutrition and Obesity, The American British Cowdray Medical Center Observatorio, Mexico City, Mexico
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Johnn H Herrera-Kok
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Leon, Leon, Spain
| | - Jacques Himpens
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Delta CHIREC Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lilian Kow
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Matthew Kroh
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Patrick Noel
- Clinique Bouchard, ELSAN, Marseille, France
- Emirates Specialty Hospital, DHCC, Dubai, UAE
| | - Juan P Pantoja
- Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Jaime Ponce
- CHI Memorial Hospital Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Gerhard Prager
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Rui Ribeiro
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Lusiadas Amadora, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Elena Ruiz-Ucar
- Department of Bariatric and Endocrine Surgery, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paulina Salminen
- Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Scott Shikora
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Small
- Directorate of General Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Christine Stier
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Safwan Taha
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Center, Mediclinic Hospital Airport Road, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Eren Halit Taskin
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Antonio Torres
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University Medical School, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM); IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Vaz
- Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Hospital CUF Tejo, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Department of Surgery, Enodcrine-Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Vall Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Zerrweck
- The American British Cowdray Medical Center Santa Fe, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Natan Zundel
- Department of Surgery, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Chetan Parmar
- Department of Surgery, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- Apollo Hospitals Educational and Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India
- University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kermansaravi M, Chiappetta S, Parmar C, Shikora SA, Prager G, LaMasters T, Ponce J, Kow L, Nimeri A, Kothari SN, Aarts E, Abbas SI, Aly A, Aminian A, Bashir A, Behrens E, Billy H, Carbajo MA, Clapp B, Chevallier JM, Cohen RV, Dargent J, Dillemans B, Faria SL, Neto MG, Garneau PY, Gawdat K, Haddad A, ElFawal MH, Higa K, Himpens J, Husain F, Hutter MM, Kasama K, Kassir R, Khan A, Khoursheed M, Kroh M, Kurian MS, Lee WJ, Loi K, Mahawar K, McBride CL, Almomani H, Melissas J, Miller K, Misra M, Musella M, Northup CJ, O'Kane M, Papasavas PK, Palermo M, Peterson RM, Peterli R, Poggi L, Pratt JSA, Alqahtani A, Ramos AC, Rheinwalt K, Ribeiro R, Rogers AM, Safadi B, Salminen P, Santoro S, Sann N, Scott JD, Shabbir A, Sogg S, Stenberg E, Suter M, Torres A, Ugale S, Vilallonga R, Wang C, Weiner R, Zundel N, Angrisani L, De Luca M. Current recommendations for procedure selection in class I and II obesity developed by an expert modified Delphi consensus. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3445. [PMID: 38341469 PMCID: PMC10858961 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54141-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is widely considered the most effective option for treating obesity, a chronic, relapsing, and progressive disease. Recently, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued new guidelines on the indications for MBS, which have superseded the previous 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines. The aim of this study is to establish the first set of consensus guidelines for selecting procedures in Class I and II obesity, using an Expert Modified Delphi Method. In this study, 78 experienced bariatric surgeons from 32 countries participated in a two-round Modified Delphi consensus voting process. The threshold for consensus was set at an agreement or disagreement of ≥ 70.0% among the experts. The experts reached a consensus on 54 statements. The committee of experts reached a consensus that MBS is a cost-effective treatment option for Class II obesity and for patients with Class I obesity who have not achieved significant weight loss through non-surgical methods. MBS was also considered suitable for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or higher. The committee identified intra-gastric balloon (IGB) as a treatment option for patients with class I obesity and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) as an option for patients with class I and II obesity, as well as for patients with T2DM and a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2. Sleeve gastrectomy (1) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were also recognized as viable treatment options for these patient groups. The committee also agreed that one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a suitable option for patients with Class II obesity and T2DM, regardless of the presence or severity of obesity-related medical problems. The recommendations for selecting procedures in Class I and II obesity, developed through an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus, suggest that the use of standard primary bariatric endoscopic (IGB, ESG) and surgical procedures (SG, RYGB, OAGB) are acceptable in these patient groups, as consensus was reached regarding these procedures. However, randomized controlled trials are still needed in Class I and II Obesity to identify the best treatment approach for these patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Hazrat-e Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Sonja Chiappetta
- Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Scott A Shikora
- Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Teresa LaMasters
- Unitypoint Clinic Weight Loss Specialists, West Des Moines, IA, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jaime Ponce
- Bariatric Surgery Program, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Lilian Kow
- Adelaide Bariatric Centre, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Department of Surgery, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shanu N Kothari
- Prisma Health, Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Edo Aarts
- WeightWorks Clinics and Allurion Clinics, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ahmad Aly
- Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Ali Aminian
- Department of General Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmad Bashir
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC)-Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Helmuth Billy
- Ventura Advanced Surgical Associates, Ventura, CA, USA
| | - Miguel A Carbajo
- Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Benjamin Clapp
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA
| | | | - Ricardo V Cohen
- Center for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paolo, Brazil
| | | | - Bruno Dillemans
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jan Brugge-Oostende, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Silvia L Faria
- Gastrocirurgia de Brasilia, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| | | | - Pierre Y Garneau
- Division of Bariatric Surgery, CIUSSS-NIM, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Khaled Gawdat
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ashraf Haddad
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC)-Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Kelvin Higa
- Fresno Heart and Surgical Hospital, UCSF Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA
| | - Jaques Himpens
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Delta Chirec Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Farah Husain
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, USA
| | - Matthew M Hutter
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kazunori Kasama
- Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Félix Guyon, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Amir Khan
- Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, UK
| | | | - Matthew Kroh
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marina S Kurian
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei-Jei Lee
- Medical Weight Loss Center, China Medical University Shinchu Hospital, Zhubei City, Taiwan
| | - Ken Loi
- Director of St George Surgery, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- South Tyneside and Sunderland Foundation NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | | | | | - John Melissas
- Bariatric Unit, Heraklion University Hospital, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
| | - Karl Miller
- Diakonissen Wehrle Private Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Mary O'Kane
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Pavlos K Papasavas
- Division of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Mariano Palermo
- Department of Surgery, Centro CIEN-Diagnomed, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Richard M Peterson
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Ralph Peterli
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis, University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luis Poggi
- Department of Surgery Clinica Anglo Americana, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| | - Janey S A Pratt
- Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, GS 112, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Aayad Alqahtani
- New You Medical Center, King Saud University, Obesity Chair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Almino C Ramos
- Medical Director of Gastro-Obeso-Center, Institute for Metabolic Optimization, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karl Rheinwalt
- Department of Bariatric, Metabolic, and Plastic Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rui Ribeiro
- Centro Multidisciplinar Do Tratamento da Obesidade, Hospital Lusíadas Amadora e Lisbon, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Ann M Rogers
- Department of Surgery - Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paulina Salminen
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Sergio Santoro
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05652-900, Brazil
| | - Nathaniel Sann
- Advanced Surgical Partners of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - John D Scott
- Division of Bariatric and Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Asim Shabbir
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stephanie Sogg
- Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Michel Suter
- Department of Surgery, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Torres
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Calle del Prof Martín Lagos, S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Surendra Ugale
- Kirloskar and Virinchi Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Endocrine, Bariatric, and Metabolic Surgery Department, Universitary Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cunchuan Wang
- Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rudolf Weiner
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Natan Zundel
- Department of Surgery, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Luigi Angrisani
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Anoldo P, Manigrasso M, D’Amore A, Musella M, De Palma GD, Milone M. Abdominal Wall Hernias-State of the Art of Laparoscopic versus Robotic Surgery. J Pers Med 2024; 14:100. [PMID: 38248801 PMCID: PMC10817490 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Abdominal wall hernia repair, a common surgical procedure, includes various techniques to minimize postoperative complications and enhance outcomes. This review focuses on the comparison between laparoscopic and robotic approaches in treating inguinal and ventral hernias, presenting the ongoing situation of this topic. A systematic search identified relevant studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches for inguinal and ventral hernias. Randomized control trials, retrospective, and prospective studies published after 1 January 2000, were included. Search terms such as hernia, inguinal, ventral, laparoscopy, robotic, and surgery were used. A total of 23 articles were included for analysis. Results indicated similar short-term outcomes for robotic and laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia repair, with robotic groups experiencing less postoperative pain. However, longer operative times and higher costs were associated with robotic repair. Robotic ventral hernia repair demonstrated potential benefits, including shorter hospital stay, lower recurrence and lower reoperation rates. While robotic surgery offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and less postoperative pain, challenges including costs and training requirements need consideration. The choice between laparoscopic and robotic approaches for abdominal wall hernias should be tailored based on individual surgeon expertise and resource availability, emphasizing a balanced evaluation of benefits and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.D.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Anna D’Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.D.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.D.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.D.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Luca M, Zese M, Silverii GA, Ragghianti B, Bandini G, Forestieri P, Zappa MA, Navarra G, Foschi D, Musella M, Sarro G, Pilone V, Facchiano E, Foletto M, Olmi S, Raffelli M, Bellini R, Gentileschi P, Cerbone MR, Grandone I, Berardi G, Di Lorenzo N, Lucchese M, Piazza L, Casella G, Manno E, Zaccaroni A, Balani A, Mannucci E, Monami M. Bariatric Surgery for Patients with Overweight/Obesity. A Comprehensive Grading Methodology and Network Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Weight Loss Outcomes and Adverse Events. Obes Surg 2023; 33:4147-4158. [PMID: 37917391 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06909-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to compare different types of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) with lifestyle intervention/medical therapy (LSI/MT) for the treatment of overweight/obesity. The present and network meta-analysis (NMA) includes randomized trials. MBS was associated with a reduction of BMI, body weight, and percent weight loss, when compared to LSI/MT, and also with a significant reduction of HbA1c and a higher remission of diabetes. Meta-regression analyses revealed that BMI, a higher proportion of women, and a longer duration of trial were associated with greater effects of MBS. The NMA showed that all surgical procedures included (except greater curvature plication) were associated with a reduction of BMI. MBS is an effective option for the treatment of obesity. The choice of BMI thresholds for eligibility for surgery of patients with different complications should be performed making an evaluation of risks and benefits in each BMI category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio De Luca
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Metabolica, Azienda ULSS5 Polesana, Ospedale di Rovigo, 45010, Rovigo, Italia
| | - Monica Zese
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Metabolica, Azienda ULSS5 Polesana, Ospedale di Rovigo, 45010, Rovigo, Italia.
| | | | - Benedetta Ragghianti
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi e Università di Firenze, 50134, Firenze, Italia
| | - Giulia Bandini
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi e Università di Firenze, 50134, Firenze, Italia
| | - Pietro Forestieri
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biochimiche Avanzate, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli "Federico II", 80138, Napoli, Italia
| | | | - Giuseppe Navarra
- Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino" Messina, 98124, Messina, Italia
| | | | - Mario Musella
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biochimiche Avanzate, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli "Federico II", 80138, Napoli, Italia
| | - Giuliano Sarro
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e Bariatrica, Istituto Clinico Alta Specialità' San Gaudenzio - Novara, Gruppo Policlinico di Monza, 28100, Novara, Italia
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Università degli Studi di Salerno A.O.U. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona Ospedale G. Fucito, 84131, Salerno, Italia
| | | | - Mirto Foletto
- Policlinico Universitario di Padova, 35128, Padova, Italia
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Policlinico San Marco, Bergamo, 24046, Bergamo, Italia
| | - Marco Raffelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, 00168, Italia
| | - Rosario Bellini
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, 56126, Pisa, Italia
| | - Paolo Gentileschi
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica-Ospedale San Carlo di Nancy, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma e Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, 00165, (Ravenna), Italia
| | | | - Ilenia Grandone
- SC Diabetologia Dietologia e Nutrizione Clinica, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, 05100, Terni, Italia
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biochimiche Avanzate, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli "Federico II", 80138, Napoli, Italia
| | | | - Marcello Lucchese
- Ospedale Santa Maria Nuova-Chirurgia Generale e Bariatrica - Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Centro, 50122, Firenze, Italia
| | - Luigi Piazza
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Arnas Garibaldi, 95123, Catania, Italia
| | - Giovanni Casella
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Università La Sapienza, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, 00161, Roma, Italia
| | - Emilio Manno
- AORN A. Cardarelli Napoli, UO Chirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, 80131, Napoli, Italia
| | - Alberto Zaccaroni
- Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Ospedale G.B.Morgagni, 47121, Forlì, Italia
| | - Alessandro Balani
- Dipartimento Chirurgico del Presidio Ospedaliero Gorizia-Monfalcone, ASS2 Isontina, 34170, Gorizia, Italia
| | - Edoardo Mannucci
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi e Università di Firenze, 50134, Firenze, Italia
| | - Matteo Monami
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi e Università di Firenze, 50134, Firenze, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jazi AHD, Mahjoubi M, Shahabi S, Alqahtani AR, Haddad A, Pazouki A, Prasad A, Safadi BY, Chiappetta S, Taskin HE, Billy HT, Kasama K, Mahawar K, Gawdat K, Rheinwalt KP, Miller KA, Kow L, Neto MG, Yang W, Palermo M, Ghanem OM, Lainas P, Peterli R, Kassir R, Puy RV, Da Silva Ribeiro RJ, Verboonen S, Pintar T, Shabbir A, Musella M, Kermansaravi M. Bariatric Evaluation Through AI: a Survey of Expert Opinions Versus ChatGPT-4 (BETA-SEOV). Obes Surg 2023; 33:3971-3980. [PMID: 37889368 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06903-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advancements in artificial intelligence, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, are revolutionizing various sectors, including healthcare. This study investigates the use of ChatGPT-4 in identifying suitable candidates for bariatric surgery and providing surgical recommendations to improve decision-making in obesity treatment amid the global obesity epidemic. METHODS We devised ten patient scenarios, thoughtfully encompassing a spectrum that spans from uncomplicated cases to more complex ones. Our objective was to delve into the decision-making process regarding the recommendation of bariatric surgery. From July 29th to August 10th, 2023, we conducted a voluntary online survey involving thirty prominent bariatric surgeons, ensuring that there was no predetermined bias in the selection of a specific type of bariatric surgery. This survey was designed to collect their insights on these scenarios and gain a deeper understanding of their professional experience and background in the field of bariatric surgery. Additionally, we consulted ChatGPT-4 in two separate conversations to evaluate its alignment with expert opinions on bariatric surgery options. RESULTS In 40% of the scenarios, disparities were identified between the two conversations with ChatGPT-4. It matched expert opinions in 30% of cases. Differences were noted in cases like gastrointestinal metaplasia and gastric adenocarcinoma, but there was alignment with conditions like endometriosis and GERD. CONCLUSION The evaluation of ChatGPT-4's role in determining bariatric surgery suitability uncovered both potential and shortcomings. Its alignment with experts was inconsistent, and it often overlooked key factors, emphasizing human expertise's value. Its current use requires caution, and further refinement is needed for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Niyaesh Avenue, Sattar Khan Street, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mahjoubi
- Clinical Research Development Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
| | - Shahab Shahabi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Niyaesh Avenue, Sattar Khan Street, Tehran, Iran.
| | | | - Ashraf Haddad
- Gastrointestinal Metabolic and Bariatric Center, GBMC M, Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | - Abdolreza Pazouki
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Niyaesh Avenue, Sattar Khan Street, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arun Prasad
- GI, Bariatric and Robotic Surgery Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sonja Chiappetta
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Halit Eren Taskin
- Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Kazunori Kasama
- Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Khaled Gawdat
- Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine Department of General Surgery, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Karl Peter Rheinwalt
- Department of Bariatric, Metabolic and Plastic Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Lilian Kow
- Department GI Surgery Flinders, University South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Wah Yang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mariano Palermo
- Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, HEAL Academy, Athens, Greece
| | - Ralph Peterli
- Deputy Head of Visceral Surgery and Head of Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Digestive Surgery Unit, University Hospital of La Réunion -Félix Guyon Hospital, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Ramon Vilallonga Puy
- Head Endocrine-Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Vall Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Pg. De La Vall d'hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rui José Da Silva Ribeiro
- General Surgery Department, Multidisciplinary Center for Obesity Treatment - Hospital Lusíadas Amadora, Amadora, Portugal
| | | | - Tadeja Pintar
- UMC Ljubljana, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Asim Shabbir
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Niyaesh Avenue, Sattar Khan Street, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kermansaravi M, Vitiello A, Valizadeh R, Shahmiri SS, Musella M. Comparing the safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly (>60 years) with severe obesity: an umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3541-3554. [PMID: 37800553 PMCID: PMC10651291 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Today, bariatric surgeons face the challenge of treating older adults with class III obesity. The indications and outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) also constitute a controversy. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched to retrieve systematic reviews/meta-analyses published by 1 March 2022. The selected articles were qualitatively evaluated using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). RESULTS An umbrella review included six meta-analyses retrieved from the literature. The risk of early-emerging and late-emerging complications decreased by 55% and 41% in the patients underwent SG than in those receiving RYGB, respectively. The chance of the remission of hypertension and obstructive sleep apnoea, respectively increased by 43% and 6%, but type-2 diabetes mellitus decreased by 4% in the patients underwent RYGB than in those receiving SG. RYGB also increased excess weight loss by 15.23% in the patients underwent RYGB than in those receiving SG. CONCLUSION Lower levels of mortality and early-emerging and late-emerging complications were observed in the older adults undergoing SG than in those receiving RYGB, which was, however, more efficient in term of weight loss outcomes and recurrence of obesity-related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Department of Surgery ,Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Center of Excellence of European Branch of International Federation for Surgery of Obesity, Hazrat_e Rasool Hospital, Tehran
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, “Federico II” University, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri
- Department of Surgery ,Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Center of Excellence of European Branch of International Federation for Surgery of Obesity, Hazrat_e Rasool Hospital, Tehran
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, “Federico II” University, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vitiello A, Abu-Abeid A, Dayan D, Berardi G, Musella M. Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review of Studies Reporting 10+ Years Outcomes. Obes Surg 2023; 33:3565-3570. [PMID: 37743393 PMCID: PMC10603075 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06824-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Systematic search of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed in order to find all the articles reporting 10+ years of LSG results. Eleven studies including 1020 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall weighted mean %TWL was 24.4% (17-36.9%), and remission rates from TD2M to HTN were 45.6% (0-94.7%) and 41.4% (0-78.4%), respectively. De novo GERD had an overall prevalence of 32.3% (21.4-58.4%), and five cases (0.5%) of Barrett's disease were reported. Revisional surgery was required for 19.2% (1-49.5%) of patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the most common secondary procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Adam Abu-Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Danit Dayan
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Anoldo P, Manigrasso M, D'Amore A, Musella M, De Palma GD, Milone M. Dual docking technique for robotic repair of simultaneous inguinal and umbilical hernia: A preliminary single center experience. Int J Med Robot 2023:e2586. [PMID: 37830434 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess clinical results in terms of intraoperative outcomes, recovery and recurrence of our robotic technique for the treatment of patients affected by simultaneous inguinal and umbilical hernia, providing technical details to facilitate multiquadrant surgery in robotic hernia repair. METHODS Data from patients affected by simultaneous primary inguinal and umbilical hernia who underwent robotic repair with our dual docking technique was retrospectively analysed. RESULTS Fifteen patients were included. No intraoperative complications occurred. All patients achieved complete mobilisation within 7 h. The mean length of hospital stay was 21.6 h, with five patients discharged on the same day of surgery. There was no major complication and no recurrence within the median follow-up period of 673 days. CONCLUSIONS This surgical technique shows optimal postoperative outcomes, such as early mobilisation and short length of stay. Our study provides an aid to surgeons performing multiquadrant robotic surgery for the treatment of abdominal hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna D'Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Manigrasso M, Velotti N, De Palma GD, Musella M. Comment on Wijnia, J.W. A Clinician's View of Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6755. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6393. [PMID: 37835037 PMCID: PMC10573923 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We have read with great interest the article by Wijnia [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.V.); (M.M.)
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.V.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vitiello A, Iacovazzo C, Berardi G, Vargas M, Marra A, Buonanno P, Velotti N, Musella M. Propensity score matched analysis of postoperative nausea and pain after one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Updates Surg 2023; 75:1881-1886. [PMID: 37193850 PMCID: PMC10543143 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01536-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The aim of our study was to assess and compare postoperative nausea and pain after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Patients undergoing OAGB and LSG at our institution between November 2018 and November 2021 have been prospectively asked to report postoperative nausea and pain on a numeric analogic scale. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect scores of these symptoms at the 6th and 12th postoperative hour. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate effect of type of surgery on postoperative nausea and pain scores. To adjust for baseline differences between cohorts, a propensity score algorithm was used to match LSG patients to MGB/OAGB patients in a 1:1 ratio with a 0.1 tolerance. A total number of 228 (119 SGs and 109 OAGBs) subjects were included in our study. Nausea after OAGB was significantly less severe than after LSG both at the 6th and 12th hour assessment; pain was less strong after OAGB at the 6th hour but not after 12 h. Fifty-three individuals had a rescue administration of metoclopramide after LSG and 34 after OAGB (44.5% vs 31.2%, p = 0.04); additional painkillers were required by 41 patients after LSG and 23 after OAGB (34.5% vs 21.1%, p = 0.04). Early postoperative nausea was significantly less severe after OAGB, while pain was comparable especially at the 12th hour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine Iacovazzo
- Department of Neurological, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Vargas
- Department of Neurological, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Annachiara Marra
- Department of Neurological, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Buonanno
- Department of Neurological, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rocco N, Velotti N, Pontillo M, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Accurso A, Masone S, Musella M. New techniques versus standard mapping for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1699-1710. [PMID: 37326934 PMCID: PMC10435404 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01560-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
New tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), as indocyanine green (ICG), superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and micro bubbles, have been recently introduced in clinical practice showing promising but variable results. We reviewed the available evidence comparing these new techniques with the standard tracers to evaluate their safety. To identify all available studies, a systematic search was performed in all electronic databases. Data regarding sample size, mean number of SLN harvested for patient, number of metastatic SLN and SLN identification rate of all studies were extracted. No significant differences were found in terms of SLNs identification rates between SPIO, RI and BD but with a higher identification rate with the use of ICG. No significant differences were also found for the number of metastatic lymph nodes identified between SPIO, RI and BD and the mean number of SLNs identified between SPIO and ICG versus conventional tracers. A statistically significant differences in favor of ICG was reported for the comparison between ICG and conventional tracers for the number of metastatic lymph nodes identified. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of both ICG and SPIO for the pre-operative mapping of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer treatment is adequately effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Rocco
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Martina Pontillo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonello Accurso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Masone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gentile M, Illario M, De Luca V, Cestaro G, Velotti N, Sivero S, Musella M. Gastrointestinal bezoars: Review of the literature and report of a rare case of pumpkin seed rectal impaction. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:3432-3436. [PMID: 37225563 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In science, bezoar is a mass of hair or undigested vegetable matter, found in a human or animal's intestines, similar to a hairball. Usually, it is found trapped in every part of the gastrointestinal system and must be distinguished by pseudobezoar which is an indigestive object voluntarily introduced into the digestive tract. The term Bezoar is from Arabic bāzahr, "bezoar" or ultimately from Middle Persian p'tzhl pādzahr, "antidote, bezoar"ægagropile o egagropile It should be a universal antidote that works against any poison, and could neutralize any poison. Otherwise, the name could derive from a kind of Turkish goat whose name is just bezoar. Authors report a case of fecal impaction by pumpkin seeds bezoar with abdominal pain: a difficulty to void with subsequent rectal inflammation and hemorrhoid enlargement was observed. The patient underwent a successful manual disimpaction. Guidelines do not require IRB approval Authors examined the literature about occlusion from bezoar The most common causes of occlusion from bezoar are: a previous gastric surgery such as a gastric band (for weight loss) or gastric bypass, a reduced stomach acid (hypochlorhydria) or decreased stomach size, a delayed gastric emptying, typically due to diabetes, autoimmune disorders, or mixed connective tissue disease. Seed bezoars are usually found in the rectum of patients without predisposing factors, causing constipation and pain. Rectal impaction is common after ingestion of seeds while a true occlusion is rare. Although several cases of phytobezoars composed of various types of seeds are reported in literature, bezoars of pumpkin seeds have rarely been reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Gentile
- Department of Medicine and Surgery Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Maddalena Illario
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Luca
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Sivero
- Neurosciences.Reproduction Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Federico II University of Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Abu-Abeid A, Musella M. Timing of Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19 Vaccination: Experience From a High-volume Single Center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:133-136. [PMID: 36821652 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the last year, there was a large COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy. Concurrently, metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) restarted after a long period of discontinuity. No data are currently available on the best timing of COVID-19 vaccination for MBS candidates. The aim of this study was to report MBS outcomes in relation to the timing of COVID-19 vaccine administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospectively maintained database was utilized to locate patients undergoing MBS between January 1 and December 31, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients receiving a vaccine dose within 30 days before or after surgery (Group±30); and patients with a longer time interval of vaccine dose before or after surgery (Group>±30). Postoperative outcomes were recorded and compared. RESULTS A total of 108 patients were included: 33 (30.6%) of whom were in Group±30 and 74(69.4%) in Group>30. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. Findings revealed that postoperative outcomes (ie, 30-d complications and length of stay postoperatively) were comparable between groups. Two patients in the ±30 group had mesenteric vein thrombosis after sleeve gastrectomy (SG); however, the rate of thrombosis events was comparable between groups ( P =0.09). Thrombosis between SG patients were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination within 30 days of MBS does not impact complication rates and length of stay. COVID-19 vaccination may have a negative impact on venous thrombosis after SG, but this study is underpowered to draw this conclusion. Larger studies should be conducted to replicate current study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Adam Abu-Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gentileschi P, Sensi B, Siragusa L, Sorge R, Rispoli E, Angrisani L, Galfrascoli E, Bianciardi E, Giusti MP, De Luca M, Zappa MA, Balani A, Bellini R, Benavoli D, Berardi G, Casella G, Basso N, Cerbone MR, Di Lorenzo N, Facchiano E, Foletto M, Forestieri P, Foschi D, Grandone I, Lucchese M, Manno E, Musella M, Navarra G, Olmi S, Piazza L, PIlone V, Raffaelli M, Sarro G, Zaccaroni A. Evolution of Bariatric Surgery in Italy in the Last 11 Years: Data from the SICOB Yearly National Survey. Obes Surg 2023; 33:930-937. [PMID: 36690866 PMCID: PMC9871429 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06435-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery (BS) is a relatively novel surgical field and is in continuous expansion and evolution. PURPOSE Aim of this study was to report changes in Italian surgical practice in the last decade. METHODS The Società Italiana di Chirurgia dell'Obesità (SICOB) conducted annual surveys to cense activity of SICOB centers between 2011 and 2021. Primary outcome was to detect differences in frequency of performance of adjustable gastric banding (AGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD), and gastric plication (GP). Secondary outcome was to detect differences in performance of main non-malabsorptive procedures (AGB + SG) and overall bypass procedures (RYGB + OAGB). Geographical differences were also investigated. RESULTS Median response rate was 92%. AGB declined from 36% of procedures in 2011 to 5% in 2021 (p < 0.0001). SG increased from 30% in 2011 to 55% in 2021 (p < 0.0001). RYGB declined from 25 to 12% of procedures (p < 0.0001). OAGB rose from 0% of procedures in 2011 to 15% in 2021 (p < 0.0001). BPD underwent decrease from 6.2 to 0.2% in 2011 and 2021, respectively (p < 0.0001). Main non-malabsorptive procedures significantly decreased while overall bypass procedures remained stable. There were significant differences among regions in performance of SG, RYGB, and OAGB. CONCLUSIONS BS in Italy evolved significantly during the past 10 years. AGB underwent a decline, as did BPD and GP which are disappearing and RYGB which is giving way to OAGB. The latter is rising and is the second most-performed procedure after SG which has been confirmed as the preferred procedure by Italian bariatric surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Gentileschi
- Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Sorge
- Department of Biostatistics, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Angrisani
- Public Health Department "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Elisa Galfrascoli
- Department of General Surgery, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Bianciardi
- Department of Systems Medicine, Psychiatric Chair, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio De Luca
- Chief Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Berardi G, Vitiello A, Abu-Abeid A, Schiavone V, Franzese A, Velotti N, Musella M. Micronutrients Deficiencies in Candidates of Bariatric Surgery: Results from a Single Institution over a 1-Year Period. Obes Surg 2023; 33:212-218. [PMID: 36331725 PMCID: PMC9834098 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06355-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Micronutrient deficiencies represent a common condition after bariatric surgery (BS). The prevalence of these nutritional disorders before BS is still debated. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in candidates for BS. METHODS A prospectively maintained database of our institution was searched to find all patients who underwent surgery between January and December 2021. The following data were collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), obesity-associated diseases, and preoperative serum levels of vitamin B12, folate, and vitamin D. RESULTS A total of 174 patients were included in our study. Mean age and BMI were 39.2 ± 11.4 years and 44.3 ± 7.1 kg/m2, respectively. One hundred and thirty-nine patients (79.9%) had at least one preoperative micronutrient disorder, with vitamin D deficiency being the most common (116, 66.7%), followed by a deficit of folate (76, 43.7%) and vitamin B12 (10, 5.7%). Forty-seven (27%) individuals had insufficient levels of vitamin D. Comparison of deficiencies between sexes showed that vitamin B12 < 20 ng/ml was significantly more frequent in women (p = 0.03). DLP showed a mild significant effect on folate levels (p = 0.01), while the association of HNT and T2DM had a mild significant effect on vitamin B12 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative micronutrient deficiencies were frequently found in candidates for BS. Approximately 90% of patients had deficient or insufficient serum levels of vitamin D preoperatively. Almost half of the patients had a preoperative deficit of folate, and vitamin B12 deficiency was significantly more frequent in the female population. It is mandatory to screen all patients undergoing BS for vitamin deficiencies before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Adam Abu-Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906 Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franzese
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”—via S.Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Manetti C, Vitiello A. Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence. Updates Surg 2023; 75:169-174. [PMID: 36169887 PMCID: PMC9834165 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Very little has been published on the learning curve (LC) of the One Anastomosis /Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB). Aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of OABG/MGBs performed during the LC of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon to global benchmark cut-offs. First 200 patients undergoing OAGB/MGB at our university hospital from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively included in this study. LC of the surgeon was divided in two groups of 100 consecutive patients each and perioperative outcomes were compared to abovementioned global benchmarks for LSG and RYGB. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed for operative time and hospital stay. Uneventful postoperative recovery was recorded in 95% of patients. All benchmark values for RYGB were met in group 2. Comparison with cut-offs for LSG showed longer hospital stay and operative time in both groups but postoperative rate of complications resulted lower even for Group 1. CUSUM graph of the operative time runs randomly above the predetermined limit till the 40th cases but reaches the plateau after the 115th operation. CUSUM curve of the hospital stay reaches the plateau after the 57th case. OAGB/MGB confirms to be a feasible procedure, which can be safely and effectively performed during the learning curve. However, at least 100 hundred cases are required to reduce operative time and hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Cristina Manetti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vitiello A, Abu Abeid A, Peltrini R, Ferraro L, Formisano G, Bianchi PP, Del Giudice R, Taglietti L, Celentano V, Berardi G, Bracale U, Musella M. Minimally Invasive Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia: Multi-Institutional Retrospective Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:69-73. [PMID: 35877826 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in general surgery. Despite surgical advances, recurrence and chronic pain are still major issues after this intervention. Aim of our study was to retrospectively assess and compare outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods: All patients who underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair between 2014 and 2021 in five different institutions were included in our study. Baseline data on age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking habit, and anticoagulant therapy were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained databases. Operative time, length of stay, and early and late complications were compared between the robotic and the laparoscopic approach. Results: Forty-eight patients underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair between January 2014 and December 2021. Twenty-three patients underwent a robotic procedure, whereas 25 were submitted to the laparoscopic intervention. Overall mean follow-up was 26.2 months. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Acceptable and comparable rates of peri- and postoperative outcomes were recorded. However, postoperative visual analog scale score and incidence of chronic pain were lower after the robotic rather than after the laparoscopic approach. (2.9 versus 3.8 P = .002; 20% versus 0%; P = .02, respectively). Conclusions: Minimally invasive repair of recurrent inguinal hernia is safe and feasible; robotic surgery is associated with low rate of postoperative and chronic pain without a significant increase in operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Adam Abu Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roberto Peltrini
- Public Health Department, Naples "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Formisano
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Valerio Celentano
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. London, United Kingdom
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- Public Health Department, Naples "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Manzo R, Listorti I, Colasante A, Scarselli F, Greco P, Arrivi C, Watson L, Greco A, Varricchio M, Pirastu G, Musella M, Barberi M, Uva D, Pristera' A, Greco E. P-267 A continuous culture medium with a lower concentration of lactate has a pronounced effect on the percentage of usable blastocysts on day 5. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Does Continuous Single Culture Medium NX, an embryo culture medium containing 1mM lactate, support increased blastocyst development over high lactate Vitrolife G1/G2 Series sequential culture?
Summary answer
There is a statistically significant increase in day 5 usable blastocysts in low lactate culture medium compared to the one with high lactate medium.
What is known already
Studies have shown that day 5 is the most desirable day to obtain blastocysts that are of an expansion, grade and quality to be utilized for transfer and/or vitrification procedures as those result in the highest success of clinical pregnancy,as compared to day 6/ 7 blastocysts, that do not meet criteria. Moreover, recent studies have indicated that there is an increase in chromosomal correctness of embryos cultured in a 1mM lactate environment as opposed to the higher 6-10mM lactate concentrations that have historically been believed necessary for successful blastocyst culture and resulting pregnancy.
Study design, size, duration
A prospective split sibling oocytes study was performed on 50 ICSI and IMSI cycles from October 2020 through April 2021. Oocytes were divided into the low lactate medium and high lactate gradient medium immediately following ICSI/IMSI and thereafter cultured in those medium until the final day of blastocyst culture. All patient ages were included in the sample population.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
This study was carried out in a private clinic. All patient stimulation protocol information and diagnosis’ were recorded; however, there was no restriction on participation. The endpoint was to analyse the resulting usable blastocyst rates on day 5 and day 6 in both arms of the study, using a denominator of normal 2PN fertilization. If a blastocyst was transferred or cryopreserved on day 5 or day 6, it was determined to be usable.
Main results and the role of chance
The resulting data was stratified not only by day 5 and day 6 usable blastocyst rates but also by patient age. It illustrates a statistically significant improvement in day 5 usable blastocysts for patients <35 in CSCM-NXC vs G1/G2 at 56% and 42%, respectively, a 14% increase (p < .05). The overall day 5 usable blastocyst rate was also statistically significant in CSCM-NXC (47%) as compared to G1/G2 (36%), (p < .05) with all ages considered. Additionally, on day 5, there was a higher percentage of usable blastocysts demonstrated in low lactate vs high in patients aged 35-37 (65% vs 42%, respectively) and 41-42 (41% vs 15%). Statistical significance was reversed in patients <35 on day 6, with G1/G2 having 24% usable blasts and CSCM-NXC 10% (p < .05). Interestingly, though not significant, G1/G2 had an increase in usable blastocyst percentage on day 5 in patients >42 (20% vs 11%), but overall, CSCM-NXC saw an increase in that same age group by 16%.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Though statistical significance was found in this study, a greater number will help to bolster the statistical power of the observations. Additionally, more studies are needed in order to ascertain if low lactate has an effect on the development prior to ICSI and resulting culture.
Wider implications of the findings
The mechanism of action that leads to the successful embryo development in low lactate embryo culture medium is vastly unknown, so further studies are required in order to understand the complexities and the impact of the observations provided.
Trial registration number
not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Manzo
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - I Listorti
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - A Colasante
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - F Scarselli
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - C Arrivi
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - L Watson
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - A Greco
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | | | - G Pirastu
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - M Musella
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - M Barberi
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - D Uva
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - A Pristera'
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| | - E Greco
- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Private IVF Center , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pirastu G, Listorti I, Manzo R, Barberi M, Musella M, Zazzaro V, Colasante A, Varricchio M, Scarselli F, Mencacci C, Arrivi C, Litwicka K, Greco P, Greco A, Greco E. P-260 Study of kinetic parameters using KIDscoreTMDay5 version 3.0 in euploid, mosaic and aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Do kinetic parameters change among euploid, mosaic and aneuploid blastocysts? Is the KIDscoreTMDay5 version 3.0 (KS-5.3) correlated to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) results?
Summary answer
The KS-5.3 differs in embryo ploidy classes. The analysis of the kinetic variables showed that the aneuploid embryos were significantly slower than euploid and mosaic.
What is known already
Chromosomal abnormalities affect more than 50% of embryos in women with >35 years of age and PGT-A is the best way to predict embryo’s ploidy status decreasing implantation failure and miscarriage. However, this procedure is not always possible due to social or moral issues. So, the use of the non-invasive time lapse monitoring could be helpful to determine the morphokinetic characteristics in the different ploidy classes. KS-5.3 (vitrolife,Sweden) is a scoring model based on morphokinetic data, developed to predict the pregnancy rate of day-5 blastocysts. Recent publications showed differences in kinetic parameters between euploid and aneuploid embryos.
Study design, size, duration
This retrospective study analyzed 728 blastocysts with PGT-A results obtained at Villa Mafalda Clinic from May 2020 to June 2021. Embryos were cultured in EmbryoScope+ time-lapse system (Vitrolife) at 37 °C, 6%CO2, and 5% O2. The PGT-A was performed using next-generation sequence (NGS) technology on the trophectoderm biopsy sample on day 5/6/7. Automatic annotations for division times and quality gradings were performed by senior embryologists and all kinetic values were reported in hours post microinjection.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
728 blastocysts were classified in: (E) euploid (n = 172), (M) mosaicism (n = 171) and (A) aneuploid (n = 385). In this study, they were considered KS-5.3 and the following kinetic variables: the time to reach 2 cells (t2), 3 cells (t3), 4 cells (t4), 5 cells (t5), and the blastocyst formation (TB). Continuous variables were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR). For the statistical analysis, nonparametric tests were performed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Main results and the role of chance
KS5.3 was significantly different between groups [E = 6.6(4.6-7.9) vs M = 5.3(2.9-7.2) vs A = 4.0(2.5-6.6), p < 0.0001]. It was significantly higher in euploid than in mosaic and aneuploid (EvsM p = 0.0007, EvsA p <0.0001, MvsA p = 0.0077). A significant delay in t2,t3,t4 and tb was showed in aneuploid embryos compared to euploid and mosaic, whereas there was no significant difference between euploid and mosaic: [t2: E = 25.80 (24.56-28.09), M = 25.99 (24.49-28.91), A = 27.02 (25.30-29.47), EvsA p <0.0001, AvsM p = 0.03, EvsM p = 0.32]; [t3: E = 37.08 (34.74-39.34), M = 36.69 (34.55-40.02), E = 38.45 (35.93-41.14), EvsA p = 0.0003, MvsA p = 0.002, EvsM p >0.99]; [t4: E = 38.28 (35.63-41.19), M = 38.49 (35.47-42.13), A 39.72 (37.25-43.31), EvsA p = 0.0001, MvsA p = 0.02, EvsM p = 0.65]; [tb: E = 107.70 (102.20-114.30), M = 110.10 (103.60-116.80), A = 113.7 (106.80-122.70), EvsA p <0.0001, MvsA p <0.0001, EvsM p = 0.42]. As for t5, there were no differences among the groups. Longer cell cycles in aneuploid embryos could be associated with activated DNA repair mechanism or during chromosome segregation. Instead, regarding the mosaics, there was a significant difference with euploid embryos only in KS5.3. The age was similar between euploid and mosaic [E = 36.29 (33.42-39.00) vs M = 36.71 (34.00-39.33) p = 0.99], whereas that was significantly higher in aneuploid embryos [A = 39.11(36.01-42.27), EvsA/EvsM p <0.0001].
Limitations, reasons for caution
All these findings have to be validated in a larger sample size. Furthermore, for the retrospective nature of this study, there were some confounding factors, such as protocol of stimulation, female age, and malefactor. This research did not consider the importance of every single kinetic parameter.
Wider implications of the findings
A further study is needed to verify if there is a correlation between morphology and ploidy status. This could clarify the difference in KS-5.3 between euploid and mosaic. In order to decrease age bias, we should enlarge the sample size to analyze a subgroup of patients with higher maternal age.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pirastu
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - I Listorti
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - R Manzo
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - M Barberi
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - M Musella
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - V Zazzaro
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - A Colasante
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | | | - F Scarselli
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - C Mencacci
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - C Arrivi
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - K Litwicka
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - P Greco
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - A Greco
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| | - E Greco
- Villa Mafalda, fertility clinic , Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S, Shahabi S, Abbass A, Abbas SI, Abouzeid M, Antozzi L, Asghar ST, Bashir A, Bhandari M, Billy H, Caina D, Campos FJ, Carbajo MA, Chevallier JM, Jazi AHD, de Gordejuela AGR, Haddad A, ElFawal MH, Himpens J, Inam A, Kassir R, Kasama K, Khan A, Kow L, Kular KS, Lakdawala M, Layani LA, Lee WJ, Luque-de-León E, Loi K, Mahawar K, Mahdy T, Musella M, Nimeri A, González JCO, Pazouki A, Poghosyan T, Prager G, Prasad A, Ramos AC, Rheinwalt K, Ribeiro R, Ruiz-Úcar E, Rutledge R, Shabbir A, Shikora S, Singhal R, Taha O, Talebpour M, Verboonen JS, Wang C, Weiner R, Yang W, Vilallonga R, De Luca M. Patient Selection in One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass-an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus. Obes Surg 2022; 32:2512-2524. [PMID: 35704259 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06124-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is up to date the third most performed obesity and metabolic procedure worldwide, which recently has been endorsed by ASMBS. The main criticisms are the risk of bile reflux, esophageal cancer, and malnutrition. Although IFSO has recognized this procedure, guidance is needed regarding selection criteria. To give clinicians a daily support in performing the right patient selection in OAGB/MGB, the aim of this paper is to generate clinical guidelines based on an expert modified Delphi consensus. METHODS A committee of 57 recognized bariatric surgeons from 24 countries created 69 statements. Modified Delphi consensus voting was performed in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was considered to indicate a consensus. RESULTS Consensus was achieved for 56 statements. Remarkably, ≥ 90.0% of the experts felt that OAGB/MGB is an acceptable and suitable option "in patients with Body mass index (BMI) > 70, BMI > 60, BMI > 50 kg/m2 as a one-stage procedure," "as the second stage of a two-stage bariatric surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy for BMI > 50 kg/m2 (instead of BPD/DS)," and "in patients with weight regain after restrictive procedures. No consensus was reached on the statement that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in case of resistant Helicobacter pylori. This is likely as there is a concern that this procedure is associated with reflux and its related long-term complications including risk of cancer in the esophagus or stomach. Also no consensus reached on OAGB/MGB as conversional surgery in patients with GERD after restrictive procedures. Consensus for disagreement was predominantly achieved "in case of intestinal metaplasia of the stomach" (74.55%), "in patients with severe Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)(C,D)" (75.44%), "in patients with Barrett's metaplasia" (89.29%), and "in documented insulinoma" (89.47%). CONCLUSION Patient selection in OAGB/MGB is still a point of discussion among experts. There was consensus that OAGB/MGB is a suitable option in elderly patients, patients with low BMI (30-35 kg/m2) with associated metabolic problems, and patients with BMIs more than 50 kg/m2 as one-stage procedure. OAGB/MGB can also be a safe procedure in vegetarian and vegan patients. Although OAGB/MGB can be a suitable procedure in patients with large hiatal hernia with concurrent hiatal hernia, it should not be offered to patients with grade C or D esophagitis or Barrett's metaplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Sonja Chiappetta
- Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahab Shahabi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alaa Abbass
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11591, Egypt
| | | | - Mohamed Abouzeid
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11591, Egypt
| | | | | | - Ahmad Bashir
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC)-Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Helmuth Billy
- Ventura Advanced Surgical Associates, Ventura, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Caina
- Dr. Federico Abete Hospital for Trauma and Emergency, Obesity and Metabolic Center, Malvinas, Argentina
| | | | - Miguel-A Carbajo
- Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ashraf Haddad
- Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC)-Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Jacques Himpens
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Delta Chirec Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aatif Inam
- Department of General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU Félix Guyon, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Kazunori Kasama
- Weight Loss and Metabolic Surgery Center, Yotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Amir Khan
- Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, UK
| | - Lilian Kow
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Wei-Jei Lee
- Min-Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | | | - Ken Loi
- St George Surgery, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- South Tyneside and Sunderland Foundation NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Tarek Mahdy
- Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Sharjah University Hospital, Sharjah, UAE
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Abdolreza Pazouki
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tigran Poghosyan
- Hôpital Européen-Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Karl Rheinwalt
- Department of Bariatric, Metabolic and Plastic Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rui Ribeiro
- Centro de Excelencia Para a Cirurgia MetabolicaGrupo Lusiadas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Elena Ruiz-Úcar
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Rutledge
- International Center for Laparoscopic Obesity Surgery, Punjab, India
| | - Asim Shabbir
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Scott Shikora
- Department of Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rishi Singhal
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Osama Taha
- Plastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Bariatric Unit, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Mohammad Talebpour
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Cunchuan Wang
- Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rudolf Weiner
- Bariatric Surgery Unit, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wah Yang
- Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Endocrine, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Department, Universitary Hospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Manetti C, Musella M. Linear Versus Circular Laparoscopic Gastrojejunal Anastomosis of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Comparative Studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2022; 32:393-398. [PMID: 35583520 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the rate of complications of linear versus circular gastrojejunal anastomosis of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was carried out using the terms "laparoscopic," "circular," "linear," "anastomosis," "gastric bypass" in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Only original articles in English language comparing linear versus circular anastomosis were included. No temporal interval was set. Outcome measures were wound infection, bleeding, marginal ulcer, leak, and stricture. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. RESULTS Twenty-two articles (7 prospective and 15 retrospective) out of 184 retrieved papers were included in this study. The pooled analysis showed a reduced odd of wound infection and bleeding after linear anastomosis. Likelihood of marginal ulcer, leak, and stricture was similar after the 2 techniques. Wound infection was reported in 15 studies (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45; P=0.0003; I2=91), bleeding in 9 (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.59; P=0.00001; I2=6) marginal ulcer in 11 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26-1.41; P=0.25; I2=65), leaks in 15 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21-1.67; P=0.34; I2=83) and stricture in 18 (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-1.00; P=0.05; I2=68). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic RYGB can be safely performed both with circular and linear staplers. Rates of wound infection and bleeding were significantly lower after linear gastrojejunal anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vitiello A, Abu-Abeid A, Berardi G, DI Matteo S, Manetti C, Musella M. Topical hemostatic application on staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-surgeon experience. Minerva Surg 2022; 78:139-144. [PMID: 35575678 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09617-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is a common bariatric procedure with low complication rates. Several hemostatic agents have been used to reduce staple line bleeding, but its impact is unclear. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the early (30-day) complications comparing oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) and fibrin sealant (FS) application on the staple line. The secondary endpoints were to compare the need for postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative blood work values of Hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), drain output volume and hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent LSG between January and October 2021 was performed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the use of ORC versus FS on the staple line. Early postoperative complications, Hb level, WBC count, and drain output volume were compared between groups. RESULTS A total number of 77 patients were included: 27 in the ORC-group and 50 in the FS-group. No major complication was recorded in both groups. There was no significant difference in the need for blood transfusion, Hb value, and drain output volume on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. There was a significantly higher WBC count in the ORC-group on POD 1 and 2. There was no difference in hospital LOS between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of FS and ORC was associated with a comparable low rate of bleeding. ORC causes an increased WBC count postoperatively, but this showed no clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, AOU Federico II, Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Adam Abu-Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel- Aviv, Israel -
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, AOU Federico II, Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Sabrina DI Matteo
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, AOU Federico II, Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Cristina Manetti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, AOU Federico II, Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, AOU Federico II, Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Galloro G, Musella M, Siciliano S, Berardi G, Vitiello A, Velotti N, Rizzello F, Gionchetti P, Calabrese C. New endoscopic capsule vs upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in preoperative work-up of obese candidate for bariatric surgery: Relevance of a pilot study in the COVID-19 era. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E183-E191. [PMID: 35178336 PMCID: PMC8847058 DOI: 10.1055/a-1723-3109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Obesity represents a major health concern; bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment reducing and maintaining weight loss. The role of a routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) prior bariatric surgery is still debated. Moreover, in this scenario of COVID-19 pandemic, EGD is even more questionable due to the procedural risk of viral transmission. A new model of video-endoscopic capsule (VEC) recently has been introduced as a good alternative to the EGD. The aim of this study was to determine if this new capsule is an adequate diagnostic alternative to EGD in the work-up of patients selected for bariatric surgery, particularly in the setting of COVID-19. Patients and methods From January to November 2020, 27 patients selected for bariatric surgery were enrolled in this pilot study to assess for noninferiority of VEC compared to EGD in detection of upper gastrointestinal disease. Results VEC had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in identification of significant lesions of 91.3 %, 83.33 %, 98.01 %, and 51.57 %, respectively, compared with EGD as the standard criterion. The accuracy was 90.51 % (95 % CI, 73.75 %-98.18 %) and the chi-square statistic is 0.1153 ( P = 0.73). Conclusions Our report confirms the diagnostic noninferiority of VEC in preoperative work-up of patients selected for bariatric surgery, compared to EGD. This is very important, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, given the high risk of contamination with EGD. Larger multicenter studies are required to confirm our preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Galloro
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery – Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences – Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Saverio Siciliano
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery – Surgical Endoscopy Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences – Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences – Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- University of Naples Federico II – School of Medicine, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences – Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Naples, Italy
| | - Fernando Rizzello
- University of Bologna Alma Mater – School of Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – Regional Referral Center for IBD, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- University of Bologna Alma Mater – School of Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – Regional Referral Center for IBD, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Calabrese
- University of Bologna Alma Mater – School of Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences – Regional Referral Center for IBD, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kermansaravi M, Lainas P, Shahmiri SS, Yang W, Jazi AD, Vilallonga R, Antozzi L, Parmar C, Kassir R, Chiappetta S, Zubiaga L, Vitiello A, Mahawar K, Carbajo M, Musella M, Shikora S. The first survey addressing patients with BMI over 50: a survey of 789 bariatric surgeons. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6170-6180. [PMID: 35064321 PMCID: PMC9283149 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08979-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Bariatric surgery in patients with BMI over 50 kg/m2 is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to address main issues regarding perioperative management of these patients by using a worldwide survey. Methods An online 48-item questionnaire-based survey on perioperative management of patients with a BMI superior to 50 kg/m2 was ideated by 15 bariatric surgeons from 9 different countries. The questionnaire was emailed to all members of the International Federation of Surgery for Obesity (IFSO). Responses were collected and analyzed by the authors. Results 789 bariatric surgeons from 73 countries participated in the survey. Most surgeons (89.9%) believed that metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) on patients with BMI over 50 kg/m2 should only be performed by expert bariatric surgeons. Half of the participants (55.3%) believed that weight loss must be encouraged before surgery and 42.6% of surgeons recommended an excess weight loss of at least 10%. However, only 3.6% of surgeons recommended the insertion of an Intragastric Balloon as bridge therapy before surgery. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) was considered the best choice for patients younger than 18 or older than 65 years old. SG and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass were the most common procedures for individuals between 18 and 65 years. Half of the surgeons believed that a 2-stage approach should be offered to patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2, with SG being the first step. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was recommended for 2 and 4 weeks by 37.8% and 37.7% of participants, respectively. Conclusion This survey demonstrated worldwide variations in bariatric surgery practice regarding patients with a BMI superior to 50 kg/m2. Careful analysis of these results is useful for identifying several areas for future research and consensus building. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08979-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Center of Excellence of European Branch of International Federation for Surgery of Obesity, Hazrat_e Rasool Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Clamart, France
- Metropolitan Hospital of Athens, HEAL Academy, Athens, Greece
| | - Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Wah Yang
- Department of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Endocrine, Metabolic and Bariatric Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Center of Excellence for the EAC-BC, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L'Obésité, Toulon, France
| | | | - Chetan Parmar
- Department of Surgery, The Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Félix Guyon, St Denis de la Réunion, France
| | - Sonja Chiappetta
- Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Lorea Zubiaga
- Miguel Hernandez of Elche University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- South Tyneside and Sunderland Foundation NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Miguel Carbajo
- Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Scott Shikora
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Musella M. Reply to the Response to: Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Short-Term Weight Loss in a Single Italian Institution: 1-Year Updated Data. Obes Surg 2022; 32:954. [PMID: 35034273 PMCID: PMC8761100 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05833-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II" - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cestaro G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Musella M, Gentile M. HIV screening in patients with anal condylomatosis. An overview about ethical and legal issues. Ann Ital Chir 2021; 10:S2239253X21037312. [PMID: 34807003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Although there is a strong evidence of prevalence of condylomata in the HIV-positive population, literature on HIV prevalence in HIV-unscreened population diagnosed with condylomata is still unconclusive. Our aim is to review literature about HIV screening and diagnosis of anal condylomata in order to evaluate medical aspects, ethical and legal issues concerning the management of this disease. We undertook an online search on Pubmed for the keywords "HIV", "screening" and "anal condylomata" and 23 papers were analysed, 2 being randomized controlled trial, 11 comparative studies and 10 reviews. A total of 1270 patients were reviewed. All authors strongly recommend HIV testing in patients with clinical evidence of anal condylomata. In undeveloped countries with high prevalence of HIV, a proctological evaluation could be a could represent an unexpected therapeutic option for HIV infected male patients to prevent anal cancer. Clinical trials and prospective studies are necessary to validate this interesting hypothesis. KEY WORDS: Anal condylomatosis, HIV screening, Papilloma virus.
Collapse
|
30
|
Manigrasso M, Milone M, Musella M, Venetucci P, Maione F, Elmore U, Gallo G, Perinotti R, De Palma GD. Preoperative Localization in Colonic Surgery (PLoCoS Study): a multicentric experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Updates Surg 2021; 74:137-144. [PMID: 34611841 PMCID: PMC8827339 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01180-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this prospective multicentric study was to compare the accurate colonic lesion localization ratio between CT and colonoscopy in comparison with surgery. All consecutive patients from 1st January to 31st December 2019 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of dysplastic adenoma or adenocarcinoma with planned elective, curative colonic resection who underwent both colonoscopy and CT scans were included. Each patient underwent conventional colonoscopy and CT to stage the tumour, and the localization results of each procedure were registered. CT and colonoscopic localization were compared with surgical localization, adopted as the reference. Our analysis included 745 patients from 23 centres. After comparing the accuracy of colonoscopy and CT (for visible lesions) in localizing colonic lesions, no significant differences were found between the two preoperative tools (510/661 vs 499/661 correctly localized lesions, p = 0.518). Furthermore, after analysing only the patients who underwent complete colonoscopy and had a visible lesion on CT, no significant difference was observed between conventional colonoscopy and CT (331/427 vs 340/427, p = 0.505). Considering the intraoperative localization results as a reference, a comparison between colonoscopy and CT showed that colonoscopy significantly failed to correctly locate the lesions localized in the descending colon (17/32 vs 26/32, p = 0.031). We did not identify an advantage in using CT to localize colonic tumours. In this setting, colonoscopy should be considered the reference to properly localize lesions; however, to better identify lesions in the descending colon, CT could be considered a valuable tool to improve the accuracy of lesion localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Venetucci
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 60 Via Olgettina, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Roberto Perinotti
- Colorectal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Infermi Hospital, Biella, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Vitiello A. Ten-Year Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Retrospective Matched Comparison with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-Is There a Significant Difference in Long Term? Obes Surg 2021; 31:5267-5274. [PMID: 34601648 PMCID: PMC8595233 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05735-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure performed worldwide while the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been almost abandoned. Aim of this study was to retrospectively assess 10-year outcomes of LSG through a matched comparison with LAGB. Materials and Methods Retrospective search of prospectively maintained database of our university was carried out to find all patients that underwent LSG before December 2010. Each subject with LSG was matched one-to-one with a patient that had undergone LAGB in the same period with correspondent preoperative age, BMI, and sex. Results A total of 76 patients underwent LSG before 2010 and were all included in this study; a matched group of 76 out of 178 LAGB patients with 10-year follow-up was retrieved from our database. Comparison between the two groups showed better outcomes after LSG at 1 and 5 years but weight loss was comparable with the LAGB group at 10 years (%TWL 22.2 ± 13 vs 21.2 ± 16.1; p = 0.89). No significant difference was found in conversion/removal rate (15.8% vs 18.4%; p = 0.67). Conclusion LSG is an effective stand-alone bariatric procedure with better outcomes than LAGB in medium term, but results are comparable at 10 years. Subjects undergoing LSG should be informed that conversion to RYGB or OAGB may be necessary to achieve further weight loss or to treat reflux. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
De Maio F, Boru CE, Avallone M, Velotti N, Bianco DM, Capoccia D, Greco F, Guarisco G, Nogara M, Sanguinetti M, Verrastro O, Capaldo B, Musella M, Raffaelli M, Delogu G, Silecchia G, Leonetti F. Characterization of gut microbiota in patients with metabolic syndrome candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery: Preliminary findings of a multi-center prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 180:109079. [PMID: 34599974 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION gut microbiota (GM) seems to be involved in the pathophysiology and progression of both metabolic syndrome (MS) and obesity. The aim was to investigate GM's composition in patients with severe obesity, candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery BMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multicentre, prospective, cohort study, enrolling 84 patients with BMI 40-55 kg/m2, divided bymetabolic status (MS) inhealthy(group A), pre-MS (B), or MS (C). RESULTS No differences were foundregarding anthropometric,nutritional parameters, except for vitamin D.As a whole the alpha and beta diversity examinations showed no statistical differences in GM profile. A total of 5/7 phyla with relative frequencies were identified above 0.1% (Actinobacteria,Bacteroidetes,Firmicutes,Proteobacteria,Verrucomicrobia).FusobacteriaandPatescibacteriarepresented the less abundant. There were no significant differences in the top ten genera.Data onBacteroidetes(inversely related to triglycerides and LDL and directly related to HDL levels) and onFirmicutes(opposite trend) relative abundances suggest no differences among the three conditions.No correlation between the relative abundance of themain phylaand plasmatic glucose levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS In a selected cohort of patients with obesity, MS did not affect the preoperative GM's profile. Severe obesity, per se, seems to be an independent condition affecting GM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio De Maio
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Facoltà di Medicina, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie - Sezione di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Cristian Eugeniu Boru
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
| | - Marcello Avallone
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Delia Mercedes Bianco
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie - Sezione di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danila Capoccia
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gloria Guarisco
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Nogara
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Maurizio Sanguinetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Facoltà di Medicina, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie - Sezione di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ornella Verrastro
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Brunella Capaldo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Delogu
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Facoltà di Medicina, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
| | - Frida Leonetti
- Division of General Surgery and Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO-EC, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Singhal R, Ludwig C, Rudge G, Gkoutos GV, Tahrani A, Mahawar K, Pędziwiatr M, Major P, Zarzycki P, Pantelis A, Lapatsanis DP, Stravodimos G, Matthys C, Focquet M, Vleeschouwers W, Spaventa AG, Zerrweck C, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Musella M, Sanchez-Meza A, Cantu FJ, Mora F, Cantu MA, Katakwar A, Reddy DN, Elmaleh H, Hassan M, Elghandour A, Elbanna M, Osman A, Khan A, Layani L, Kiran N, Velikorechin A, Solovyeva M, Melali H, Shahabi S, Agrawal A, Shrivastava A, Sharma A, Narwaria B, Narwaria M, Raziel A, Sakran N, Susmallian S, Karagöz L, Akbaba M, Pişkin SZ, Balta AZ, Senol Z, Manno E, Iovino MG, Osman A, Qassem M, Arana-Garza S, Povoas HP, Vilas-Boas ML, Naumann D, Super J, Li A, Ammori BJ, Balamoun H, Salman M, Nasta AM, Goel R, Sánchez-Aguilar H, Herrera MF, Abou-Mrad A, Cloix L, Mazzini GS, Kristem L, Lazaro A, Campos J, Bernardo J, González J, Trindade C, Viveiros O, Ribeiro R, Goitein D, Hazzan D, Segev L, Beck T, Reyes H, Monterrubio J, García P, Benois M, Kassir R, Contine A, Elshafei M, Aktas S, Weiner S, Heidsieck T, Level L, Pinango S, Ortega PM, Moncada R, Valenti V, Vlahović I, Boras Z, Liagre A, Martini F, Juglard G, Motwani M, Saggu SS, Al Moman H, López LAA, Cortez MAC, Zavala RA, D'Haese C, Kempeneers I, Himpens J, Lazzati A, Paolino L, Bathaei S, Bedirli A, Yavuz A, Büyükkasap Ç, Özaydın S, Kwiatkowski A, Bartosiak K, Walędziak M, Santonicola A, Angrisani L, Iovino P, Palma R, Iossa A, Boru CE, De Angelis F, Silecchia G, Hussain A, Balchandra S, Coltell IB, Pérez JL, Bohra A, Awan AK, Madhok B, Leeder PC, Awad S, Al-Khyatt W, Shoma A, Elghadban H, Ghareeb S, Mathews B, Kurian M, Larentzakis A, Vrakopoulou GZ, Albanopoulos K, Bozdag A, Lale A, Kirkil C, Dincer M, Bashir A, Haddad A, Hijleh LA, Zilberstein B, de Marchi DD, Souza WP, Brodén CM, Gislason H, Shah K, Ambrosi A, Pavone G, Tartaglia N, Kona SLK, Kalyan K, Perez CEG, Botero MAF, Covic A, Timofte D, Maxim M, Faraj D, Tseng L, Liem R, Ören G, Dilektasli E, Yalcin I, AlMukhtar H, Al Hadad M, Mohan R, Arora N, Bedi D, Rives-Lange C, Chevallier JM, Poghosyan T, Sebbag H, Zinaï L, Khaldi S, Mauchien C, Mazza D, Dinescu G, Rea B, Pérez-Galaz F, Zavala L, Besa A, Curell A, Balibrea JM, Vaz C, Galindo L, Silva N, Caballero JLE, Sebastian SO, Marchesini JCD, da Fonseca Pereira RA, Sobottka WH, Fiolo FE, Turchi M, Coelho ACJ, Zacaron AL, Barbosa A, Quinino R, Menaldi G, Paleari N, Martinez-Duartez P, de Aragon Ramírez de Esparza GM, Esteban VS, Torres A, Garcia-Galocha JL, Josa M, Pacheco-Garcia JM, Mayo-Ossorio MA, Chowbey P, Soni V, de Vasconcelos Cunha HA, Castilho MV, Ferreira RMA, Barreiro TA, Charalabopoulos A, Sdralis E, Davakis S, Bomans B, Dapri G, Van Belle K, Takieddine M, Vaneukem P, Karaca ESA, Karaca FC, Sumer A, Peksen C, Savas OA, Chousleb E, Elmokayed F, Fakhereldin I, Aboshanab HM, Swelium T, Gudal A, Gamloo L, Ugale A, Ugale S, Boeker C, Reetz C, Hakami IA, Mall J, Alexandrou A, Baili E, Bodnar Z, Maleckas A, Gudaityte R, Guldogan CE, Gundogdu E, Ozmen MM, Thakkar D, Dukkipati N, Shah PS, Shah SS, Shah SS, Adil MT, Jambulingam P, Mamidanna R, Whitelaw D, Adil MT, Jain V, Veetil DK, Wadhawan R, Torres A, Torres M, Tinoco T, Leclercq W, Romeijn M, van de Pas K, Alkhazraji AK, Taha SA, Ustun M, Yigit T, Inam A, Burhanulhaq M, Pazouki A, Eghbali F, Kermansaravi M, Jazi AHD, Mahmoudieh M, Mogharehabed N, Tsiotos G, Stamou K, Barrera Rodriguez FJ, Rojas Navarro MA, Torres OMO, Martinez SL, Tamez ERM, Millan Cornejo GA, Flores JEG, Mohammed DA, Elfawal MH, Shabbir A, Guowei K, So JB, Kaplan ET, Kaplan M, Kaplan T, Pham D, Rana G, Kappus M, Gadani R, Kahitan M, Pokharel K, Osborne A, Pournaras D, Hewes J, Napolitano E, Chiappetta S, Bottino V, Dorado E, Schoettler A, Gaertner D, Fedtke K, Aguilar-Espinosa F, Aceves-Lozano S, Balani A, Nagliati C, Pennisi D, Rizzi A, Frattini F, Foschi D, Benuzzi L, Parikh C, Shah H, Pinotti E, Montuori M, Borrelli V, Dargent J, Copaescu CA, Hutopila I, Smeu B, Witteman B, Hazebroek E, Deden L, Heusschen L, Okkema S, Aufenacker T, den Hengst W, Vening W, van der Burgh Y, Ghazal A, Ibrahim H, Niazi M, Alkhaffaf B, Altarawni M, Cesana GC, Anselmino M, Uccelli M, Olmi S, Stier C, Akmanlar T, Sonnenberg T, Schieferbein U, Marcolini A, Awruch D, Vicentin M, de Souza Bastos EL, Gregorio SA, Ahuja A, Mittal T, Bolckmans R, Wiggins T, Baratte C, Wisnewsky JA, Genser L, Chong L, Taylor L, Ward S, Chong L, Taylor L, Hi MW, Heneghan H, Fearon N, Plamper A, Rheinwalt K, Heneghan H, Geoghegan J, Ng KC, Fearon N, Kaseja K, Kotowski M, Samarkandy TA, Leyva-Alvizo A, Corzo-Culebro L, Wang C, Yang W, Dong Z, Riera M, Jain R, Hamed H, Said M, Zarzar K, Garcia M, Türkçapar AG, Şen O, Baldini E, Conti L, Wietzycoski C, Lopes E, Pintar T, Salobir J, Aydin C, Atici SD, Ergin A, Ciyiltepe H, Bozkurt MA, Kizilkaya MC, Onalan NBD, Zuber MNBA, Wong WJ, Garcia A, Vidal L, Beisani M, Pasquier J, Vilallonga R, Sharma S, Parmar C, Lee L, Sufi P, Sinan H, Saydam M. 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Bariatric Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multinational Cohort Study of 7704 Patients from 42 Countries. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4272-4288. [PMID: 34328624 PMCID: PMC8323543 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05493-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are data on the safety of cancer surgery and the efficacy of preventive strategies on the prevention of postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 in these patients. But there is little such data for any elective surgery. The main objectives of this study were to examine the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to determine the efficacy of perioperative COVID-19 protective strategies on postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 rates. METHODS We conducted an international cohort study to determine all-cause and COVID-19-specific 30-day morbidity and mortality of BS performed between 01/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. RESULTS Four hundred ninety-nine surgeons from 185 centres in 42 countries provided data on 7704 patients. Elective primary BS (n = 7084) was associated with a 30-day morbidity of 6.76% (n = 479) and a 30-day mortality of 0.14% (n = 10). Emergency BS, revisional BS, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, and untreated obstructive sleep apnoea were associated with increased complications on multivariable analysis. Forty-three patients developed symptomatic COVID-19 postoperatively, with a higher risk in non-whites. Preoperative self-isolation, preoperative testing for SARS-CoV-2, and surgery in institutions not concurrently treating COVID-19 patients did not reduce the incidence of postoperative COVID-19. Postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 was more likely if the surgery was performed during a COVID-19 peak in that country. CONCLUSIONS BS can be performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate perioperative protocols. There was no relationship between preoperative testing for COVID-19 and self-isolation with symptomatic postoperative COVID-19. The risk of postoperative COVID-19 risk was greater in non-whites or if BS was performed during a local peak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gavin Rudge
- Institute of Applied Health Research, Murray Learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Georgios V Gkoutos
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- MRC Health Data Research UK (HDR), Midlands Site, UK
| | - Abd Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Singhal R, Ludwig C, Rudge G, Gkoutos GV, Tahrani A, Mahawar K, Pędziwiatr M, Major P, Zarzycki P, Pantelis A, Lapatsanis DP, Stravodimos G, Matthys C, Focquet M, Vleeschouwers W, Spaventa AG, Zerrweck C, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Musella M, Sanchez-Meza A, Cantu FJ, Mora F, Cantu MA, Katakwar A, Reddy DN, Elmaleh H, Hassan M, Elghandour A, Elbanna M, Osman A, Khan A, Layani L, Kiran N, Velikorechin A, Solovyeva M, Melali H, Shahabi S, Agrawal A, Shrivastava A, Sharma A, Narwaria B, Narwaria M, Raziel A, Sakran N, Susmallian S, Karagöz L, Akbaba M, Pişkin SZ, Balta AZ, Senol Z, Manno E, Iovino MG, Osman A, Qassem M, Arana-Garza S, Povoas HP, Vilas-Boas ML, Naumann D, Super J, Li A, Ammori BJ, Balamoun H, Salman M, Nasta AM, Goel R, Sánchez-Aguilar H, Herrera MF, Abou-Mrad A, Cloix L, Mazzini GS, Kristem L, Lazaro A, Campos J, Bernardo J, González J, Trindade C, Viveiros O, Ribeiro R, Goitein D, Hazzan D, Segev L, Beck T, Reyes H, Monterrubio J, García P, Benois M, Kassir R, Contine A, Elshafei M, Aktas S, Weiner S, Heidsieck T, Level L, Pinango S, Ortega PM, Moncada R, Valenti V, Vlahović I, Boras Z, Liagre A, Martini F, Juglard G, Motwani M, Saggu SS, Al Moman H, López LAA, Cortez MAC, Zavala RA, D'Haese C, Kempeneers I, Himpens J, Lazzati A, Paolino L, Bathaei S, Bedirli A, Yavuz A, Büyükkasap Ç, Özaydın S, Kwiatkowski A, Bartosiak K, Walędziak M, Santonicola A, Angrisani L, Iovino P, Palma R, Iossa A, Boru CE, De Angelis F, Silecchia G, Hussain A, Balchandra S, Coltell IB, Pérez JL, Bohra A, Awan AK, Madhok B, Leeder PC, Awad S, Al-Khyatt W, Shoma A, Elghadban H, Ghareeb S, Mathews B, Kurian M, Larentzakis A, Vrakopoulou GZ, Albanopoulos K, Bozdag A, Lale A, Kirkil C, Dincer M, Bashir A, Haddad A, Hijleh LA, Zilberstein B, de Marchi DD, Souza WP, Brodén CM, Gislason H, Shah K, Ambrosi A, Pavone G, Tartaglia N, Kona SLK, Kalyan K, Perez CEG, Botero MAF, Covic A, Timofte D, Maxim M, Faraj D, Tseng L, Liem R, Ören G, Dilektasli E, Yalcin I, AlMukhtar H, Al Hadad M, Mohan R, Arora N, Bedi D, Rives-Lange C, Chevallier JM, Poghosyan T, Sebbag H, Zinaï L, Khaldi S, Mauchien C, Mazza D, Dinescu G, Rea B, Pérez-Galaz F, Zavala L, Besa A, Curell A, Balibrea JM, Vaz C, Galindo L, Silva N, Caballero JLE, Sebastian SO, Marchesini JCD, da Fonseca Pereira RA, Sobottka WH, Fiolo FE, Turchi M, Coelho ACJ, Zacaron AL, Barbosa A, Quinino R, Menaldi G, Paleari N, Martinez-Duartez P, de Aragon Ramírez de Esparza GM, Esteban VS, Torres A, Garcia-Galocha JL, Josa M, Pacheco-Garcia JM, Mayo-Ossorio MA, Chowbey P, Soni V, de Vasconcelos Cunha HA, Castilho MV, Ferreira RMA, Barreiro TA, Charalabopoulos A, Sdralis E, Davakis S, Bomans B, Dapri G, Van Belle K, Takieddine M, Vaneukem P, Karaca ESA, Karaca FC, Sumer A, Peksen C, Savas OA, Chousleb E, Elmokayed F, Fakhereldin I, Aboshanab HM, Swelium T, Gudal A, Gamloo L, Ugale A, Ugale S, Boeker C, Reetz C, Hakami IA, Mall J, Alexandrou A, Baili E, Bodnar Z, Maleckas A, Gudaityte R, Guldogan CE, Gundogdu E, Ozmen MM, Thakkar D, Dukkipati N, Shah PS, Shah SS, Shah SS, Adil MT, Jambulingam P, Mamidanna R, Whitelaw D, Adil MT, Jain V, Veetil DK, Wadhawan R, Torres A, Torres M, Tinoco T, Leclercq W, Romeijn M, van de Pas K, Alkhazraji AK, Taha SA, Ustun M, Yigit T, Inam A, Burhanulhaq M, Pazouki A, Eghbali F, Kermansaravi M, Jazi AHD, Mahmoudieh M, Mogharehabed N, Tsiotos G, Stamou K, Barrera Rodriguez FJ, Rojas Navarro MA, Torres OMO, Martinez SL, Tamez ERM, Millan Cornejo GA, Flores JEG, Mohammed DA, Elfawal MH, Shabbir A, Guowei K, So JB, Kaplan ET, Kaplan M, Kaplan T, Pham D, Rana G, Kappus M, Gadani R, Kahitan M, Pokharel K, Osborne A, Pournaras D, Hewes J, Napolitano E, Chiappetta S, Bottino V, Dorado E, Schoettler A, Gaertner D, Fedtke K, Aguilar-Espinosa F, Aceves-Lozano S, Balani A, Nagliati C, Pennisi D, Rizzi A, Frattini F, Foschi D, Benuzzi L, Parikh C, Shah H, Pinotti E, Montuori M, Borrelli V, Dargent J, Copaescu CA, Hutopila I, Smeu B, Witteman B, Hazebroek E, Deden L, Heusschen L, Okkema S, Aufenacker T, den Hengst W, Vening W, van der Burgh Y, Ghazal A, Ibrahim H, Niazi M, Alkhaffaf B, Altarawni M, Cesana GC, Anselmino M, Uccelli M, Olmi S, Stier C, Akmanlar T, Sonnenberg T, Schieferbein U, Marcolini A, Awruch D, Vicentin M, de Souza Bastos EL, Gregorio SA, Ahuja A, Mittal T, Bolckmans R, Wiggins T, Baratte C, Wisnewsky JA, Genser L, Chong L, Taylor L, Ward S, Chong L, Taylor L, Hi MW, Heneghan H, Fearon N, Plamper A, Rheinwalt K, Heneghan H, Geoghegan J, Ng KC, Fearon N, Kaseja K, Kotowski M, Samarkandy TA, Leyva-Alvizo A, Corzo-Culebro L, Wang C, Yang W, Dong Z, Riera M, Jain R, Hamed H, Said M, Zarzar K, Garcia M, Türkçapar AG, Şen O, Baldini E, Conti L, Wietzycoski C, Lopes E, Pintar T, Salobir J, Aydin C, Atici SD, Ergin A, Ciyiltepe H, Bozkurt MA, Kizilkaya MC, Onalan NBD, Zuber MNBA, Wong WJ, Garcia A, Vidal L, Beisani M, Pasquier J, Vilallonga R, Sharma S, Parmar C, Lee L, Sufi P, Sinan H, Saydam M. 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality of Bariatric Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Multinational Cohort Study of 7704 Patients from 42 Countries. Obes Surg 2021. [PMID: 34328624 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05493-9.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are data on the safety of cancer surgery and the efficacy of preventive strategies on the prevention of postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 in these patients. But there is little such data for any elective surgery. The main objectives of this study were to examine the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to determine the efficacy of perioperative COVID-19 protective strategies on postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 rates. METHODS We conducted an international cohort study to determine all-cause and COVID-19-specific 30-day morbidity and mortality of BS performed between 01/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. RESULTS Four hundred ninety-nine surgeons from 185 centres in 42 countries provided data on 7704 patients. Elective primary BS (n = 7084) was associated with a 30-day morbidity of 6.76% (n = 479) and a 30-day mortality of 0.14% (n = 10). Emergency BS, revisional BS, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, and untreated obstructive sleep apnoea were associated with increased complications on multivariable analysis. Forty-three patients developed symptomatic COVID-19 postoperatively, with a higher risk in non-whites. Preoperative self-isolation, preoperative testing for SARS-CoV-2, and surgery in institutions not concurrently treating COVID-19 patients did not reduce the incidence of postoperative COVID-19. Postoperative symptomatic COVID-19 was more likely if the surgery was performed during a COVID-19 peak in that country. CONCLUSIONS BS can be performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate perioperative protocols. There was no relationship between preoperative testing for COVID-19 and self-isolation with symptomatic postoperative COVID-19. The risk of postoperative COVID-19 risk was greater in non-whites or if BS was performed during a local peak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gavin Rudge
- Institute of Applied Health Research, Murray Learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Georgios V Gkoutos
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,MRC Health Data Research UK (HDR), Midlands Site, UK
| | - Abd Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Velotti N, Elisa De Palma FD, Sosa Fernandez LM, Manigrasso M, Galloro G, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Milone M, De Palma GD, Musella M. Effect of bariatric surgery on in vitro fertilization in infertile men with obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1752-1759. [PMID: 34344589 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity has previously been related to reduced female fertility, with prolonged waiting time to pregnancy among women with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 but there are few studies investigating the relationship between high BMI, bariatric surgery, and male fertility. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this article was to investigate the effect of bariatric surgery on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in a cohort of men with morbid obesity who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SETTING University hospital, bariatric surgery unit. METHODS Pre- and postsurgery data on patient age, body mass index (BMI), and variables related to male fertility (semen volume, concentration, progressively motile sperm count, and sperm morphology) were collected; assisted reproductive technology outcomes before and after bariatric surgery were measured by the number of metaphase II oocytes; the number of top-quality oocytes and embryos; the number of fertilized oocytes; the number of transferred embryo; the implantation rate; the pregnancy rate; the live birth rate and the miscarriage rate. RESULTS Thirty-five men with obesity and idiopathic infertility were included in this study. We found a significant increase, after bariatric surgery, in semen volume, total sperm concentration, progressively motile sperm count, and sperm morphology. Considering IVF outcomes, mean number of top-quality oocytes, mean number of fertilized oocytes, mean number of embryos obtained, and top-quality embryos were significantly increased after bariatric procedure. CONCLUSION Bariatric surgery is confirmed to be safe and effective in increasing the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology treatment also in case of infertile men with obesity, both in terms of pregnancy and live birth rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Fatima Domenica Elisa De Palma
- Equipe 11 labellisée Lingue contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM UMRS 1138, Sorbonne Université, Université of Paris, Paris, France; Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France; CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Galloro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Velotti N, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Milone M, Musella M. Comment on "Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome despite no alcohol abuse: A summary of systematic reports" - A matter of bariatric patients' management. J Neurol Sci 2021; 427:117569. [PMID: 34253350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy.
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, D’Amore A, Marello A, Sorrentino C, Chini A, Aprea S, D’Angelo S, D’Alesio N, Musella M, Vitiello A, De Palma GD, Milone M. Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery. How to Reach Expertise? A Single Surgeon-Experience. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11070621. [PMID: 34208988 PMCID: PMC8307843 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11070621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The complexity associated with laparoscopic colorectal surgery requires several skills to overcome the technical difficulties related to this procedure. To overcome the technical challenges of laparoscopic surgery, a robotic approach has been introduced. Our study reports the surgical outcomes obtained by the transition from laparoscopic to robotic approach in colorectal cancer surgery to establish in which type of approach the proficiency is easier to reach. Data about the first consecutive 15 laparoscopic and the first 15 consecutive robotic cases are extracted, adopting as a comparator of proficiency the last 15 laparoscopic colorectal resections for cancer. The variables studied are operative time, number of harvested nodes, conversion rate, postoperative complications, recovery outcomes. Our analysis includes 15 patients per group. Our results show that operative time is significantly longer in the first 15 laparoscopic cases (p = 0.001). A significantly lower number of harvested nodes was retrieved in the first 15 laparoscopic cases (p = 0.003). Clavien Dindo I complication rate was higher in the first laparoscopic group, but without a significant difference among the three groups (p = 0.09). Our results show that the surgeon needed no apparent learning curve to reach their laparoscopic standards. However, further multicentric prospective studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Anna D’Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Alessandra Marello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Carmen Sorrentino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Alessia Chini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Salvatore Aprea
- “Federico II” University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.A.); (S.D.); (N.D.)
| | - Salvatore D’Angelo
- “Federico II” University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.A.); (S.D.); (N.D.)
| | - Nicola D’Alesio
- “Federico II” University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.A.); (S.D.); (N.D.)
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.); (P.A.); (A.D.); (A.M.); (C.S.); (A.C.); (G.D.D.P.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Musella M. Learning curve and global benchmark values of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: results of first 100 cases of a newly trained surgeon in an Italian center of excellence. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1891-1898. [PMID: 34189700 PMCID: PMC8500908 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01121-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate whether the learning curve for sleeve gastrectomy could be completed after 50 cases. First 100 patients undergoing LSG under a newly trained laparoscopic surgeon were included in this study and divided into two groups of 50 consecutive patients each. Perioperative outcomes were compared to recently introduced global benchmarks. Short-term weight loss was calculated as Total Weight Loss Percent (%TWL) and complications were classified in accordance with the Clavien–Dindo classification. CUSUM analysis was performed for operative time and hospital stay. Mean preoperative age and BMI were 41.8 ± 10.3 years and 42.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2, respectively. Demographics and rate of patients with previous surgery were comparable preoperatively in the two groups. Mean operative time was 92.1 ± 19.3 min and hospital stay was 3.4 ± 0.6 days as per our standard protocol of discharge. Uneventful postoperative course was recorded in 93% of patients and only one case of staple line leak was registered in the first 50 cases (group 1). No statistical difference in BMI and %TWL was found between the two groups at any time of follow-up. Comparison between two groups showed a significant reduction in hospital stay and operative time after the first 50 LSGs (p < 0.05). LSG can be performed by newly trained surgeons proctored by senior tutors. At least 50 cases are needed to meet global benchmark cut-offs and few more cases may be required to reach the plateau of the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Bardi U, Musella M. Comment on: Bariatric surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1673-1674. [PMID: 34187744 PMCID: PMC8195689 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- General Surgery, Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- General Surgery, Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Bardi
- General and Laparoscopic Surgery Unit, "SALUS" Private Hospital, Battipaglia, Salerno, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Velotti N, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Musella M. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Heller Myotomy: One-Step Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Achalasia in a Morbid Obese Patient. Obes Surg 2021; 31:3379-3381. [PMID: 33928522 PMCID: PMC8175316 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05376-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Di Lauro K, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, Vitiello A, Milone F, Musella M, De Palma GD, Milone M. Barbed suture in gastro-intestinal surgery: A review with a meta-analysis. Surgeon 2021; 20:115-122. [PMID: 33820730 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach is a very popular technique for many gastrointestinal operations and barbed sutures may improve the difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis by eliminating the need for knot tying. The aim of this systematic review with a meta-analysis is to explore literature to establish the security profile of barbed suture compared with conventional laparoscopic sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed in all electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE) and 12 studies were included in the analysis, involving 27,133 patients, whereof 3372 cases (patients undergone barbed suture usage) and 23,761 controls (patients undergone conventional suture usage). We found 3 studies discussing differences between barbed and conventional sutures in colorectal surgery and 8 studies presenting results in bariatric surgery, both in Roux-en-y gastric bypass and Mini Gastric/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. RESULTS We found comparable rate of leaks, bleedings and stenosis. The meta-regression analysis demonstrated that, both in case of bariatric and colorectal surgery, the demographic characteristic of patients and the oncological features of neoplasms did not impact of these findings. As expected, operative time is significantly shorter when barbed suture is used. CONCLUSION Our analysis on current literature define an acceptable security profile for barbed suture with effective results particularly in terms of shorter operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Katia Di Lauro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Milone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, De Palma GD, Musella M. Should Sleeve Gastrectomy Be Considered Only as a First Step in Super Obese Patients? 5-Year Results From a Single Center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:203-207. [PMID: 32956334 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
43
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Musella M. Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Short-term Weight Loss in a Single Italian Institution. Obes Surg 2021; 31:3365-3368. [PMID: 33721193 PMCID: PMC7957453 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05343-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Italy was the first European country to have a major outbreak of COVID-19. Bariatric procedures were stopped and telemedicine had to be implemented. A large percentage of patients struggled to follow postoperative diet and to start physical activity due to social restrictions. We have compared short-term outcomes of patients who had bariatric procedures prior to lockdown with subjects that had undergone obesity surgery in the same period of the previous year at our institution. A total number of 63 patients were included in this study. Weight loss at 1, 3 and 6 postoperative months in the 2019 group was significantly higher at any point of follow-up when compared to 2020. Social limitations and nonattendance of clinical appointments may have compromised early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Schiavone
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Musella M. Pregnancy After Bariatric Surgery: a Matter of Indications and Procedures? Obes Surg 2021; 31:2793-2794. [PMID: 33625655 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05305-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Musella M, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, Pesce M, Sarnelli G. Evaluation of reflux following sleeve gastrectomy and one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year results from a randomized open-label controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6777-6785. [PMID: 33269429 PMCID: PMC8599401 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Recent reports have demonstrated that de novo reflux and worsening of pre-existing symptoms occur after SG; concerns are still expressed about the risk of symptomatic biliary reflux gastritis and oesophagitis. The aim of our study was to investigate and compare the rate of postoperative acid and non-acid reflux following Mini-/One anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Study design A prospective randomized open-label, controlled trial registered on clinicaltrial.gov (NCT number: NCT02987673) has been carried out to evaluate esophagogastric junction exposure to reflux in the first year after MGB/OAGB and LSG using high impedance manometry, endoscopy, and a validated questionnaire. Results A total of 58 individuals were eventually enrolled in this trial and represented the per-protocol population (n = 28 MGB/OAGB, n = 30 LSG). No difference was found between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, PAGI-SYM score, acid exposure time percent of the esophagus (AET%), esophagitis, and other HRiM and MII-pH data at baseline. Comparing MII-pH outcomes of the two groups, AET% resulted significantly higher after LSG at 12 months. Endoscopic findings showed a significant increase of esophagitis ≥ B in the LSG group after 1 year; postoperative esophagitis ≥ B resulted also significantly worsened after LSG when compared to MGB/OAGB. Conclusion Since AET% and rate of esophagitis are significantly higher after LSG when compared to MGB/OAGB, this procedure should be preferred in case of preoperative subclinical reflux or low grade (A) esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanna Berardi
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marcella Pesce
- Clinical Medicine and Surgery Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Sarnelli
- Clinical Medicine and Surgery Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II” - Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quarto G, Velotti N, Milone M, Manigrasso M, Vitiello A, Venetucci P, Iacovazzo C, Benassai G, Servillo G, De Palma GD, Musella M. Small bowel obstruction secondary to adipose tissue herniation through gastric band tubing loop. An unusual case presentation. Ann Ital Chir 2020; 9:S2239253X2003457X. [PMID: 32945272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band complications like oesophageal dilatation, intractable nausea and vomiting, band migration, late slippages, and port problems with a cumulative rate of 19.2%. Rarely, LAGB complications may be related to the connection tube system and in this case the clinical presentation and the effects of the problem can generate difficulties in diagnosis. METHODS A 47 years old woman who had a LAGB placed 2 years before the symptoms was admitted in our centre with nausea, vomit, leukocytosis and distended abdomen with a generalized tenderness. Computed tomography images showed an anomalous course of banding tube and a contemporary compression of a small bowel tract secondary to the traction exerted by an adipose tissue band attracted by the tube. RESULTS A laparoscopic exploration of the abdominal cavity showed a tight loop of LAGB tubing causing a small bowel obstruction with an ischemic damage, so surgeons provided to LAGB removal and a 50 cm ileum resection CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel obstruction resulting from LAGB tubing is an uncommon complication which was reported in few cases. Although bariatric surgery currently represents the best treatment option for morbid obesity and its related- diseases, peri- and post-operative complications have always to be taken into account. KEY WORDS Adjustable gastric band complications, Bariatric surgery, Bowel obstruction, CT scan, LAGB tube.
Collapse
|
47
|
Manigrasso M, Velotti N, Sosa Fernandez LM, Vertaldi S, Maione F, Gennarelli N, Dinuzzi VP, Musella M, De Palma GD, Milone M. Endoscopic Approach to Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus: A Retrospective Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 31:1-5. [PMID: 32678724 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to report short- and long-term results using video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (PS) technique to treat recurrent PS. Methods: We included all consecutive patients with a recurrent PS disease operated on with endoscopic approach since 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2018. Analyzed outcomes were recurrence rate at 1, 3, and 5 years, time off work, time to sitting on toilet and to walk without pain, time to wound healing, rate of incomplete wound healing and postoperative infection, postoperative pain at 6 hours, 1 day, and 1 week, and patients' satisfaction after 1 month. Demographic and sinuses' data were recorded. To adjust for all the variables, multivariate analyses were performed with outcomes as dependent variables, and with patients' and sinuses' characteristics as independent variables. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis. Recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was 4.7% (3 patients on 63), at 3-year follow-up was 11.7% (4 on 34), and at 5-year follow-up was 23.07% (3 on 13). A 3- and 5-year follow-up was completed by 34 and 13 patients, respectively. The mean time off work was 3.5 ± 1.5 days, time to sitting on toilet without pain was 1.5 ± 1.1 days, and time to walk without pain was 1.3 ± 0.9 days. The mean time to wound healing was 27.9 ± 10.3 days, with a rate of incomplete wound healing of 4.7%. Postoperative infection rate was 7.9%. The mean postoperative pain was 1 ± 0.9 at 6 hours after the procedure, 0.6 ± 0.6 at 1 day and 0.1 ± 0.3 at 1 week. Patients' satisfaction was good in 98.5% of patients. After the multivariate analysis, no parameters showed an influence on the postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Our results encouraged to adopt an endoscopic approach even in case of recurrent PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Gennarelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Musella M, Vitiello A. The Eternal Dilemma of the Bile into the Gastric Pouch After OAGB: Do We Need to Worry? Obes Surg 2020; 31:426-427. [PMID: 32656728 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04845-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II"-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Vitiello
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, Naples "Federico II" University, AOU "Federico II"-Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Conzo G, Musella M, Corcione F, Depalma M, Stanzione F, Della-Pietra C, Palazzo A, Napolitano S, Pasquali D, Milone M, Agostino-Sinisi A, Ferraro F, Santini L. Role of Preoperative Adrenergic Blockade with Doxazosin on Hemodynamic Control during the Surgical Treatment of Pheochromocytoma: A Retrospective Study of 48 Cases. Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481307901125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Authors evaluated the effects of selective adrenergic blockade by means of doxazosin on blood pressure in 48 patients operated on for pheochromocytoma by a multicenter retrospective study. Age, tumor size, surgical approach, and operative time were analyzed as predictive factors of intraoperative hypertensive crises. Forty-eight patients underwent adrenalectomy—four open surgery and 44 laparoscopic surgery—for pheochromocytoma of adrenal glands from 1998 to 2008 after preoperative administration of doxazosin. Perioperative cardiovascular status modifications and surgical medium- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. There was no mortality, conversion rate was 4.5 per cent, and morbidity rate was 8.3 per cent. Intraoperative hypertensive crises (180/ 90 mmHg or higher) were observed in 14.5 per cent (seven of 48) of patients and were treated pharmacologically with no aftermath. None of the examined variables influenced the occurrence of intraoperative hypertensive episodes. Postoperative hypotension (lower than 90/60 mmHg) was observed in four of 48 patients (8.3%) and was treated by crystalloids and hydrocortisone. In the surgical treatment of pheochromocytoma, the preoperative adrenergic blockade by doxazosin does not prevent intraoperative hypertensive crises. Nevertheless, in our series, they were of short duration and were not associated with major cardiovascular complications. Perioperative hemodynamic instability was managed bypreoperative pharmacological treatment, allowing low morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Conzo
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Surgery, Orthopedics, Trauma and Emergency, University of Naples “Federico II,” Naples, Italy; the
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Maurizio Depalma
- Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Francesco Stanzione
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Cristina Della-Pietra
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Antonietta Palazzo
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Salvatore Napolitano
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| | - Daniela Pasquali
- Division of Endocrinology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Surgery, Orthopedics, Trauma and Emergency, University of Naples “Federico II,” Naples, Italy; the
| | | | - Fausto Ferraro
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Santini
- Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Science, VII Division of General Surgery Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy; the
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Navarra G, Komaei I, Currò G, Angrisani L, Bellini R, Cerbone MR, Di Lorenzo N, De Luca M, Foletto M, Gentileschi P, Musella M, Nannipieri M, Piazza L, Olmi S, Pilone V, Raffaelli M, Sarro G, Vitiello A, Zappa MA, Foschi D. Bariatric surgery and the COVID-19 pandemic: SICOB recommendations on how to perform surgery during the outbreak and when to resume the activities in phase 2 of lockdown. Updates Surg 2020; 72:259-268. [PMID: 32514743 PMCID: PMC7278242 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00821-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its related disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been rapidly spreading all over the world and is responsible for the current pandemic. The current pandemic has found the Italian national health system unprepared to provide an appropriate and prompt response, heavily affecting surgical activities. Based on the limited data available in the literature and personal experiences, the Società Italiana di Chirurgia dell’OBesità e Malattie Metaboliche (SICOB) provides recommendations regarding the triage of bariatric surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic defining a dedicated path for surgery in morbidly obese patients with known or suspected COVID-19 who may require emergency operations. Finally, the current paper delineates a strategy to resume outpatient visits and elective bariatric surgery once the acute phase of the pandemic is over. Models developed during the COVID-19 crisis should be integrated into hospital practices for future use in similar scenarios. Surgeons are presented with a golden opportunity to embrace systemic change and to drive their professional future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Navarra
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Messina "G. Martino", Messina, Italy
| | - Iman Komaei
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Messina "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Currò
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Messina "G. Martino", Messina, Italy
| | - Luigi Angrisani
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio De Luca
- Division of General Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Italy
| | | | | | - Mario Musella
- Advanced Biomedical Sciences Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Monica Nannipieri
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luigi Piazza
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, ARNAS "G. Garibaldi", Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Centre of Bariatric Surgery, San Marco Hospital, Zingonia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery Unit, A., Gemelli University Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Vitiello
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Diego Foschi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|