1
|
Akaoka M, Haruki K, Yamahata Y, Okazaki K, Furukawa K, Tsunematsu M, Shirai Y, Onda S, Matsumoto M, Ikegami T. The prognostic impact of perioperative dynamic changes in cachexia index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:917-926. [PMID: 39229565 PMCID: PMC11368508 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The cachexia index (CXI), which consists of skeletal muscle, inflammation, and nutritional status, has been associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We hypothesized that dynamic changes in CXI might be associated with long-term outcomes in HCC. Methods This study comprised 131 patients who had undergone primary hepatic resection for HCC between 2008 and 2019. Preoperative CXI (pre-CXI) and postoperative CXI (post-CXI) were calculated by the following formula: skeletal muscle index x serum albumin level / neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Pre- and post-CXI were classified into two groups (high vs. low). We retrospectively investigated the association of perioperative dynamic changes in CXI with disease-free and overall survival. Results In multivariate analyses, negative HBs-antigen (p = 0.02), high serum PIVKA-II level (p < 0.01), poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.02), multiple tumors (p < 0.01), microvascular invasion (p < 0.01), partial resection (p < 0.01), postoperative complications (p < 0.01), and low-pre-CXI (p < 0.01) were significant predictors of disease-free survival, while high ICGR15 (p = 0.01), poor tumor differentiation (p < 0.01), multiple tumors (p = 0.01), postoperative complications (p < 0.01), low-pre-CXI (p < 0.01), and low-post-CXI (p < 0.01) were significant predictors of overall survival. Low-post-CXI was associated with older age (p = 0.045), larger tumor (p < 0.01), longer operation time (p = 0.047), greater intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.01), and intraoperative blood transfusion (p < 0.01). Moreover, dynamic changes in CXI were associated with overall survival in each subgroup of patients with low-pre-CXI (p = 0.02) or high-pre-CXI (p = 0.03). Conclusions Not only post-CXI but also dynamic changes in CXI from pre- to post-hepatectomy can be a prognostic indicator of HCC, providing a compelling rationale for aggressive perioperative nutritional and physical interventions to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munetoshi Akaoka
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Koichiro Haruki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuto Yamahata
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kohei Okazaki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kenei Furukawa
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masashi Tsunematsu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Shirai
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Shinji Onda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Michinori Matsumoto
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muaddi H, Gudmundsdottir H, Cleary S. Current Status of Laparoscopic Liver Resection. Adv Surg 2024; 58:311-327. [PMID: 39089784 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
The evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery, originating in the 1990s, has been marked by significant advancements and milestones, overcoming initial technical hurdles and gaining widespread acceptance within the surgical community as a precise and safe alternative to open procedures. Along this journey, numerous challenges emerged, leading to the accumulation of evidence and the development of guidelines aimed at assisting surgeons in determining the safety, suitability, and complexity of laparoscopic liver resection. This chapter provides a thorough examination of key aspects of laparoscopic liver resection, including difficulty scoring systems, criteria for patient selection, technical considerations, outcomes across different types of liver lesions, and the innovative solutions developed to address challenges, thus offering a comprehensive overview of laparoscopic liver resection, and highlighting its evolving significance in modern hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Muaddi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Sean Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Lee B, Lee HW, Cho JY. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ than 10 cm): a retrospective analysis from a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11091-4. [PMID: 39192042 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11091-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still poor evidence about the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for huge (> 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) for patients with huge HCC from real-life data from consecutive patients. METHODS Data regarding all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for huge HCC were retrospectively collected from a Korean referral HPB center. Primary outcomes were the postoperative results, while secondary outcomes were the oncologic survivals. RESULTS Sixty-three patients were included in the study: 46 undergoing OLR and 17 LLR. Regarding postoperative outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, transfusions, postoperative bile leak, ascites, severe complications, and R1 resection rates. After a median follow-up of 48.4 (95% CI 8.9-86.8) months, there were no statistically significant differences in 3 years OS (59.3 ± 8.7 months vs. 85.2 ± 9.8 months) and 5 years OS (31.1 ± 9 months vs. 73.1 ± 14.1 months), after OLR and LLR, respectively (p = 0.10). Similarly, there was not a statistically significant difference in both 3 years DFS (23.5% ± 8.1 months vs. 51.6 ± months) and 5 years DFS (15.7 ± 7.1 months vs. 38.7 ± 15.3 months), respectively (p = 0.13), despite a potential clinically significant difference. CONCLUSION LLR for huge HCC may be safe and effective in selected cases. Further studies with larger sample size and more appropriate design are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HBP Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anbarasu CR, Williams-Perez S, Camp ER, Erstad DJ. Surgical Implications for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2773. [PMID: 39199546 PMCID: PMC11352989 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 07/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive form of liver cancer that arises in a background of chronic hepatic injury. Metabolic syndrome-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its severe form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are increasingly common mechanisms for new HCC cases. NASH-HCC patients are frequently obese and medically complex, posing challenges for clinical management. In this review, we discuss NASH-specific challenges and the associated implications, including benefits of minimally invasive operative approaches in obese patients; the value of y90 as a locoregional therapy; and the roles of weight loss and immunotherapy in disease management. The relevant literature was identified through queries of PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov. Provider understanding of clinical nuances specific to NASH-HCC can improve treatment strategy and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ernest R. Camp
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Derek J. Erstad
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen W, Hu Z, Li G, Zhang L, Li T. The State of Systematic Therapies in Clinic for Hepatobiliary Cancers. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:629-649. [PMID: 38559555 PMCID: PMC10981875 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s454666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) includes hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract carcinoma (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma), and its morbidity and mortality are significantly correlated with disease stage. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for early stage of HBC. However, a large proportion of patients with HBC are diagnosed with advanced stage and can only receive systemic treatment. According to the results of clinical trials, the first-line and second-line treatment programs are constantly updated with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. In order to improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, and reduce the adverse reactions of patients, the treatment of HBC has gradually developed from single-agent therapy to combination. The traditional therapeutic philosophy proposed that patients with advanced HBC are only amenable to systematic therapies. With some encouraging clinical trial results, the treatment concept has been revolutionized, and patients with advanced HBC who receive novel systemic combination therapies with multi-modality treatment (including surgery, transplant, TACE, HAIC, RT) have significantly improved survival time. This review summarizes the treatment options and the latest clinical advances of HBC in each stage and discusses future direction, in order to inform the development of more effective treatments for HBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixun Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhengnan Hu
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ganxun Li
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haber PK, Krenzien F, Sarıbeyoğlu K, Pratschke J, Schöning W. Integrating the new systemic treatment landscape and surgical therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Turk J Surg 2024; 40:1-10. [PMID: 39036000 PMCID: PMC11257723 DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
The treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma has evolved rapidly within the last decade. Minimally-invasive techniques have reached a new level of safety, affording surgeons to pursue more aggressive treatment strategies to ultimately improve oncological outcomes. These procedures have been increasingly applied to treat patients with more progressed tumors and in select case even patients with advanced stage disease confined to the liver. Concomitantly, a dramatic increase in research into immunotherapy has altered the treatment paradigm in advanced disease stages, where the emerging treatment regimens can provide durable responses in a subset of the patient population for whom prognosis is dramatically improved. These treatments are now tested in early-stage disease to address the pressing unmet need of high recurrence rates after resection and in intermediate stage to complement the proven efficacy of intraarterial embolization in delaying progression. This review provides an in-depth discussion of these trends and describes how the treatment landscape has already changed and which impediments remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Charité University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Lee E, Lee B, Lee HW, Cho JY, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for multiple hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the Milan criteria: An Eastern-Western propensity score-matched analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024; 31:2-11. [PMID: 37916427 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still little knowledge about the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long- term outcomes of LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) for patients with multiple HCC within and beyond the Milan criteria, and in both BCLC-A and -B stage. METHODS Data regarding all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for multiple HCC were retrospectively collected from Asian (South Korean) and European (Italian) referral HPB centers. The cases were propensity-score matched for age, BMI, center, extent of the resection, postero-superior location of the lesion, underlying liver condition, BCLB staging and the Milan criteria. RESULTS A total of 203 patients were included in the study: 27% of patients had undergone hemi-hepatectomy, 26.6% atypical resections, 20.6% sectionectomy and 16.2% segmentectomy. After PSM two cohorts of 57 patients were obtained, with no significant differences in all preoperative characteristics. The length of hospital stay was significantly lower after LLR (median 7 vs. 9 days, p < .01), with no statistically significant differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, transfusions, postoperative bile leak, ascites, severe complications and R1 resection rates. After a median follow-up of 61 (±7) months, there were no significant differences between OLR and LLR in both median OS (69 vs. 59 months, p = .74, respectively) and median DFS (12 vs. 10 months, p = .48, respectively). CONCLUSION LLR for multiple HCC can be safe and effective in selected cases and is able to shorten median hospital stay without affecting perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Eunhye Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang SY, Feng JK, Yan ML, Guo L, Duan YF, Ye JZ, Liu ZH, Xiang YJ, Xu L, Xue J, Shi J, Lau WY, Cheng SQ, Guo WX. Laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with type 2 diabetes mellitus: multicenter propensity score-matched study. Hepatol Int 2023; 17:1251-1264. [PMID: 37060489 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10492-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed at analyzing and comparing the perioperative results and long-term oncological outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with laparoscopic (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR). METHODS Clinicopathological data of HCC patients with T2DM who underwent LLR or OLR as initial treatment from four medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. The survival outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) were compared with those of patients who underwent open liver resection (OLR). Using the Kaplan-Meier method, survival curves for the two groups of patients were generated, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match patients of the LLR and OLR groups in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS 230 HCC patients with T2DM were enrolled, including 101 patients in the LLR group and 129 patients in the OLR group. After PSM, 90 patients were matched in each of the study group. Compared with the OLR group, the LLR group had less blood loss, a shorter hospitalization and fewer postoperative complications. The LLR group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the OLR group before and after PSM. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that HCC patients with T2DM had survival benefits from LLR regardless of the course of T2DM. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC patients with T2DM can be safely performed with favorable perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes at high-volume liver cancer centers, regardless of the course of T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Ye Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jin-Kai Feng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Mao-Lin Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, The Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lei Guo
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Yun-Fei Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Changzhou People's Hospital), Jiangsu, China
| | - Jia-Zhou Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Zong-Han Liu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Yan-Jun Xiang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Li Xu
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Xue
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jie Shi
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shu-Qun Cheng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Wei-Xing Guo
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sijberden JP, Cipriani F, Lanari J, Russolillo N, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Osei-Bordom D, Conci S, Görgec B, Primrose JN, Edwin B, López-Ben S, D'Hondt M, Rotellar F, Besselink MG, Dagher I, Giuliante F, Fuks D, Rozzini R, Ruzzenente A, Sutcliffe RP, Vivarelli M, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Aldrighetti LA, Abu Hilal M. Minimally invasive ver-sus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly: international multicentre propensity score-matched study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:927-930. [PMID: 36512475 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Santi López-Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Renzo Rozzini
- Department of Geriatrics, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Luca A Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiang S, Yu D, He H, Sun H, Sun Y, Zhou L, Wu Z, Gu Q. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:321-334. [PMID: 36716177 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is considered a safe and feasible treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent studies. However, in elderly patients, application of LH still remains controversial, and the outcomes of LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) have not been fully evaluated. Our objective is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of LH with OH in elderly patients with HCC. Materials and Methods: All studies comparing LH and OH in elderly patients with HCC were systematically searched in the databases of PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The last search was performed on March 20, 2022. Short-term outcomes include blood loss, operation time, blood transfusion, overall and major postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, tumor size, and surgical margin. Long-term outcomes include 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS); 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS); and 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Fourteen studies involving 1596 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The short-term outcomes of LH were a shorter postoperative hospital stay and fewer overall and major postoperative complications (all P < .00001). However, there were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, surgical margin, tumor size, and mortality. For the long-term outcomes, LH is comparable with OH in terms of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS; 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS; and 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS. Conclusions: Compared with OH, LH is a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Haijian Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Longxiang Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhongxin Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiyun Gu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yang SY, Yan ML, Duan YF, Feng JK, Ye JZ, Xiang YJ, Liu ZH, Guo L, Xue J, Cheng SQ, Guo WX. Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus laparotomic hepatectomy for BCLC stages 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma patients associated with or without microvascular invasion: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. Hepatol Int 2022; 16:892-905. [PMID: 35704267 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10353-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the long-term oncological outcomes of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients associated with or without microvascular invasion (MVI) treated with laparoscopic versus laparotomic liver resection. METHODS Clinicopathological data of HCC patients with BCLC stages 0-A from four medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. The survival outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy were compared with those who underwent laparotomic hepatectomy. Subgroup analyses in terms of MVI were further performed to explore the effect of surgical approaches on the long-term survival outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match patients between the laparoscopic and laparotomic resection groups in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS 495 HCC patients at BCLC stages 0-A were enrolled, including 243 in the laparoscopic resection group and 252 in the laparotomic resection group. Laparoscopic resection group had a shorter operation time, less blood loss, a lower frequency of blood transfusion and postoperative complication rates. The laparoscopic resection group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the laparotomic resection group before and after PSM. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that OS and RFS of patients without MVI were remarkably better in the laparoscopic resection group compared with the laparotomic resection group. However, no significant differences in OS and RFS between the two groups were found in patients with MVI after PSM. CONCLUSIONS Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stages 0-A HCC can be performed safely with favorable perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes at high-volume liver cancer centers, regardless of the presence of MVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Ye Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Mao-Lin Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, The Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
| | - Yun-Fei Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Changzhou People's Hospital), Jiangsu, China
| | - Jin-Kai Feng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jia-Zhou Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Yan-Jun Xiang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Zong-Han Liu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Lei Guo
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jie Xue
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Shu-Qun Cheng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Wei-Xing Guo
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 225 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Q, Li HJ, Dai XM, Xiang ZQ, Zhu Z. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies. Int J Surg 2022; 105:106821. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Cisneros-Garza L, González-Huezo M, Moctezuma-Velázquez C, Ladrón de Guevara-Cetina L, Vilatobá M, García-Juárez I, Alvarado-Reyes R, Álvarez-Treviño G, Allende-Pérez S, Bornstein-Quevedo L, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Carrillo-Martínez M, Castillo-Barradas M, Cerda-Reyes E, Félix-Leyva J, Gabutti-Thomas J, Guerrero-Ixtlahuac J, Higuera-de la Tijera F, Huitzil-Melendez D, Kimura-Hayama E, López-Hernández P, Malé-Velázquez R, Méndez-Sánchez N, Morales-Ruiz M, Ruíz-García E, Sánchez-Ávila J, Torrecillas-Torres L. The second Mexican consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Part II: Treatment. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 87:362-379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Peng Y, Chen K, Li B, Xu H, Wei Y, Liu F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for resectable HCC with BCLC stage B: a propensity score-matched analysis. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1291-1297. [PMID: 35739381 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01309-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
To date, there is little knowledge about the value of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B. Thus, this study was performed to assess the perioperative and oncological outcomes of LLR for these patients by comparison with open liver resection (OLR). Between April 2015 and October 2018, a total of 217 resectable HCC patients with BCLC stage B were eligible for this study. Patients were divided into the LLR group and the OLR group according to different procedures. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for known confounders. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. LLR was performed in 75 of the 217 included patients. After PSM, 72 patients with well-balanced baseline levels were enrolled into each group. Although the operative time was significantly longer in the LLR group than in the OLR group (median, 237.5 vs. 210 min, P = 0.024), the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LLR group than in the OLR group (median, 200 vs. 350 ml, P = 0.005). Patients in the LLR group had fewer complications than those in the OLR group (P = 0.035). Furthermore, overall survival (OS, P = 0.827) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.694) were comparable between the two groups. LLR for resectable HCC patients with BCLC stage B is safe and feasible in carefully selected patients and has superior perioperative outcomes and similar survival rates compared with OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufu Peng
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Kefei Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hongwei Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Delvecchio A, Conticchio M, Riccelli U, Ferraro V, Ratti F, Gelli M, Anelli FM, Laurent A, Vitali GC, Magistri P, Assirati G, Felli E, Wakabayashi T, Pessaux P, Piardi T, Di Benedetto F, de'Angelis N, Briceño-Delgado J, Adam R, Cherqui D, Aldrighetti L, Memeo R. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:933-941. [PMID: 34815189 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is a first-line curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its role is still unclear in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS The study included 665 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma liver resection cases in patients with ≥70 years of age treated in eight European hospital centres. Patients were divided into laparoscopic and open liver resection groups. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 219 patients were included in each group. Clavien-Dindo grades III/IV (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04) were lower in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group. Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group (5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between laparoscopic and open groups regarding overall survival and disease-free survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year periods. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with good short-term outcomes in patients with ≥70 years of age compared to open liver resection. Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Umberto Riccelli
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Ferdinando M Anelli
- Department of General Surgery and Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, UPEC University, Créteil, France
| | - Giulio C Vitali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Troyes Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, UPEC University, Créteil, France
| | - Javier Briceño-Delgado
- Department of General Surgery and Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Rene Adam
- Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Hepatobiliary Centre, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3732-3749. [PMID: 34406470 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08687-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several difficulty scoring systems (DSSs) have been proposed for evaluating difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and no study has validated their performance in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-only cohort at the same time. METHODS All cases with HCC that underwent LLR from January 2015 to December 2020 in our center were retrospectively collected. Performance of the IWATE-DSS, Halls-DSS, Hasegawa-DSS, and Kawaguchi-DSS in predicting perioperative outcomes was evaluated. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare perioperative outcomes between surgeons on the learning curve and surgeons that have gone through the learning curve. RESULTS For all four DSSs, there were significant distributions of applying bleeding control, surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative major complications, and postoperative hospital stay among different groups of each DSS (P all < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy or not was significantly distributed in different groups of the IWATE-DSS (P = 0.006) and Halls-DSS (P = 0.022), while it was not in the Hasegawa-DSS (P = 0.056) and Kawaguchi-DSS (P = 0.183). Trend tests showed that the conversion rates increased with higher DSS points in the IWATE-DSS (P < 0.001) and the Kawaguchi-DSS (P = 0.021), while not in the Halls-DSS (P = 0.064) and the Hasegawa-DSS (P = 0.068). In the medium and advanced/expert difficulty-level subgroups defined by the IWATE-DSS, there were larger estimated blood loss (P in medium-difficulty group = 0.009; P in the advanced/expert difficulty group = 0.004) and longer postoperative hospital stay (P in the medium-difficulty group = 0.012; P in the advanced/expert group = 0.035) in the learner-performed cases. CONCLUSIONS All DSSs performed well in predicting applying bleeding control, surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative major complications, and postoperative hospital stay, while only the IWATE-DSS was able to predict whether conversion to laparotomy or not for HCC patients underwent LLR. The IWATE-DSS was also able to help surgeons on the LLR learning curve choose cases and guide clinical practices.
Collapse
|
18
|
Durán M, Briceño J, Padial A, Anelli FM, Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Ayllón MD, Calleja-Lozano R, García-Gaitan C. Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:224-233. [PMID: 35126850 PMCID: PMC8790404 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few centers currently perform robotic liver surgery and experiences in robot-assisted surgical procedures continue to be limited compared to the laparoscopic approach.
AIM To analyze the outcomes and feasibility of an initial robotic liver program implemented in an experienced laparoscopic hepatobiliary center.
METHODS A total of forty consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection (da Vinci Xi, intuitive.com, United States) between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
RESULTS The mean age of patients was 59.55 years, of which 18 (45%) were female. The mean body mass index was 29.41 kg/m². Nine patients (22.5%) were cirrhotic. Patients were divided by type of resection as follows: Ten segmentectomies, three wedge resections, ten left lateral sectionectomies, six bisegmentectomies (two V-VI bisegmentectomies and four IVb-V bisegmentectomies), two right anterior sectionectomies, five left hepatectomies and two right hepatectomies. Malignant lesions occurred in twenty-nine (72.5%) of the patients. The mean operative time was 258.11 min and two patients were transfused intraoperatively (5%). Inflow occlusion was used in thirty cases (75%) and the mean total clamping time was 32.62 min. There was a single conversion due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo > IIIb) occurred in three patients (7.5%) and mortality in one (2.5%). No patient required readmission to the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 d.
CONCLUSION Although robotic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with favorable short-term outcomes, it involves a demanding learning curve that requires a high level of training, skill and dexterity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Durán
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Ana Padial
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Ferdinando Massimiliano Anelli
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - María Dolores Ayllón
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Rafael Calleja-Lozano
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
- GC18 Translational Research in Surgery of Solid Organ Transplantation, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Córdoba 14004, Spain
| | - Carmen García-Gaitan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of a high-volume North American center. Surgery 2021; 171:982-991. [PMID: 34742570 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resections for malignancy are increasing worldwide, and yet data from North America are lacking. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS Patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2008 and December 2019 were retrospectively studied. A propensity score matching was performed using patient demographics, laboratory parameters, etiology of liver disease, liver function, and tumor characteristics. Primary outcomes included overall survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier and competing risk cumulative incidence were used for survival analyses. Multivariable Cox regression and Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression were performed to determine hazard for death and recurrence, respectively. RESULTS Three hundred and ninety-one patients were identified (laparoscopic liver resection: 110; open liver resection: 281). After propensity score matching, 149 patients remained (laparoscopic liver resection: 57; open liver resection: 92). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to extent of hepatectomy performed and tumor characteristics. The laparoscopic liver resection group experienced a lower proportion of ≥Clavien-Dindo grade III complications (14% vs 29%; P = .01). In the matched cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rate in the laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection group was 90.9%, 79.3%, 70.5% vs 91.3%, 88.5%, 83.1% (P = .26), and the cumulative incidence of recurrence 31.1%, 59.7%, 62.9% vs 18.9%, 40.6%, 49.2% (P = .06), respectively. CONCLUSION This study represents the largest single institutional study from North America comparing long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection as a treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination of reduced short-term complications and equivalent long-term oncologic outcomes favor the laparoscopic approach when feasible.
Collapse
|
20
|
Haney CM, Studier-Fischer A, Probst P, Fan C, Müller PC, Golriz M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP, Mehrabi A, Nickel F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1467-1481. [PMID: 33820689 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been based on non-randomized studies and reviews of these. Aim of this study was to evaluate if the randomized evidence comparing LLR to open liver resection (OLR) supports these findings. METHODS A prospectively registered (reviewregistry866) systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines comparing LLR to OLR for benign and malignant diseases was performed via Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL up to 31.12.2020. The main outcome was postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0, certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS The search yielded 2080 results. 13 RCTs assessing mostly minor liver resections with 1457 patients were included. There were reduced odds of experiencing any complication (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0·42 [0·30, 0·58]) and severe complications (OR[CI]: 0·51 [0·31, 0·84]) for patients undergoing LLR. LOS was shorter (Mean difference (MD) [CI]: -2·90 [-3·88, -1·92] days), blood loss was lower (MD: [CI]: -115·41 [-146·08, -84·75] ml), and functional recovery was better for LLR. All other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS LLR shows significant postoperative benefits. RCTs assessing long-term outcomes and major resections are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caelán M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Studier-Fischer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Study Center of the German Surgical Society, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brustia R, Laurent A, Goumard C, Langella S, Cherqui D, Kawai T, Soubrane O, Cauchy F, Farges O, Menahem B, Hobeika C, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Okumura S, Hofmeyr S, Ferrero A, Pruvot FR, Regimbeau JM, Fuks D, Vibert E, Scatton O. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching. Surgery 2021; 171:1290-1302. [PMID: 34535270 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence. METHODS Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described. RESULTS During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSION The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. https://twitter.com/raffaele.brustia
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Takayuki Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Francois Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, APHP, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Benjamin Menahem
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, Créteil, France and Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Shinya Okumura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Stefan Hofmeyr
- Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - François-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Univ Lille, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care), Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France and Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, Amiens, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic, and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, CRSA, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lunel T, Mohkam K, Merle P, Bonnet A, Gazon M, Dumont PN, Ducerf C, Mabrut JY, Lesurtel M. Impact of 2016 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations on Outcomes after Hepatectomy in Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Patients. World J Surg 2021; 45:2964-2974. [PMID: 34269842 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06229-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society published new recommendations for hepatectomy in 2016. Few studies have assessed their clinical impact. The aim of this monocentric study was to assess the impact of those guidelines on outcomes after liver surgery with a special focus on cirrhotic patients. METHOD Postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy 30 months before and after ERAS implementation according to the 2016 ERAS guidelines were compared after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Primary endpoint was 90-day morbidity. RESULTS From 2015 to 2020, 430 patients underwent hepatectomy including 226 procedures performed before and 204 after ERAS implementation. After IPTW, overall morbidity (42.5% vs. 64.7%, p < 0.001), Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score (14.3 vs. 20.8, p = 0.004), length of stay (10.4 vs. 13.7 days, p = 0.001) and textbook outcome (50% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.022) were significantly improved in the ERAS group, while mortality and severe complications were similar in both groups. In the non-cirrhosis subgroup (n = 321), these results were confirmed. However, in the cirrhosis subgroup (n = 105), no difference appeared on outcomes after hepatectomy with an overall morbidity (47.5% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.069) and a length of stay (8 vs. 9 days, p = 0.310) which were not significantly different. The compliance rate to ERAS guidelines was 60% in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic subgroups. CONCLUSION Perioperative ERAS program for hepatectomy results in improved outcomes with decreased rate of non-severe morbidity. Although those guidelines are not deleterious for cirrhotic patients, they probably require revisions to be more effective in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibault Lunel
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Kayvan Mohkam
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Merle
- Hepatology Unit, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Aurélie Bonnet
- Department of Anesthesiology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Gazon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Paul-Noël Dumont
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Christian Ducerf
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sun Q, Zhang X, Gong X, Hu Z, Zhang Q, He W, Chang X, Hu Z, Chen Y. Survival analysis between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data. Hepatol Int 2021; 15:1215-1235. [PMID: 34258665 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10219-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has been widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is generally believed that the long-term outcomes of LH are not inferior to open hepatectomy (OH). However, the quality of evidence is low. The purpose of this study was to reconstruct time-to-event data for meta-analysis based on Kaplan-Meier curves from propensity-score matched studies and compare survival rates following LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS All published propensity-score matched studies reported in English that compared LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma with Kaplan-Meier curves were screened. Patients' survival information was reconstructed with the aid of a computer vision program. Different models (fixed-effects model for two-stage survival analysis and Cox regression for one-stage survival analysis) were performed for sensitivity analysis. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, two specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients by types of resection, cirrhosis status. RESULTS Time-to-event data were extracted from 45 propensity-score matched studies (N = 8905). According to the time-to-event data and the reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves, the cumulative overall survival rate was 49.0% and 50.9% in the LH and OH cohorts, respectively, a log-rank test did not demonstrate statistical significance (p > 0.05). The cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was both close to 0.0%. The median RFS time was 49.1 (95% CI 46.1 ~ 51.7) and 44.3 (95% CI 41 ~ 46.1) months. The difference in disease status was statistically significant by the Log-rank test (p < 0.05). Using the random-effects model of two-stage analysis, the minor hepatectomy subgroup (HR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.09, 1.55], I2 = 6.2%, p = 0.383) and the shared fragile model of one-stage analysis (HR = 1.44 95% CI [1.23, 1.69], p < 0.001) suggested that LH could significantly prolong RFS of patients compared with OH. This result was consistent with sensitivity analysis using different models. CONCLUSION This study was the first reconstructed time-to-event data based on a high-quality propensity-score matching study to compare the survival outcomes of LH and OH in the treatment of HCC. Results suggested that LH can improve RFS in patients with HCC undergoing minor hepatectomy and may also benefit long-term RFS in overall patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Sun
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiangda Zhang
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Xueyi Gong
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zhipeng Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Qiao Zhang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Weiming He
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Xiaojian Chang
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Zemin Hu
- General Surgery Dept. 1, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan CY. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:560-571. [PMID: 34061361 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for nonrecurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Review of 204 MILR and 755 OLR without previous LR performed between 2005 and 2018. 1:1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) and 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) were performed. RESULTS Overall, 190 MILR were well-matched with 190 OLR by PSM and 86 MILR with 86 OLR by CEM according to patient baseline characteristics. After PSM and CEM, MILR was associated with a significantly longer operation time [230 min (interquartile range [IQR], 145-330) vs. 160 min (IQR, 125-210), p < .001] [215 min (IQR, 135-295) vs. 153.5 min (120-180), p < .001], shorter postoperative stay [4 days (IQR, 3-6) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-8), p = .001)] [4 days (IQR, 3-5) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-7), p = .004] and lower postoperative morbidity [40 (21%) vs. 67 (35.5%), p = .003] [16 (18.6%) vs. 27 (31.4%), p = .036] compared to OLR. MILR was also associated with a significantly longer median time to recurrence (70 vs. 40.3 months, p = .014) compared to OLR after PSM but not CEM. There was no significant difference in terms of overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION MILR is associated with superior short-term postoperative outcomes and with at least equivalent long-term oncological outcomes compared to OLR for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Prema R Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nassar A, Tribillon E, Marchese U, Faermark N, Bonnet S, Beaussier M, Gayet B, Fuks D. Feasibility and outcomes of multiple simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2466-2472. [PMID: 33966122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08531-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgeons often remain reluctant to consider laparoscopic approach in multiple liver tumors. This study assessed feasibility and short-term results of patients who had more than 3 simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent LLR for primary or secondary malignancies between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed. After exclusion of major LLR, patients were divided into three groups: less than three (Group A), between three and five (Group B), and more than five resections (Group C) in the same procedure. Intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and textbook outcome (TO) were compared in the 3 groups. RESULTS During study period, 463 patients underwent minor LLR. Among them, 412 (88.9%) had less than 3 resections, 38 (8.2%) between 3 and 5 resections, and 13 (2.8%) more than 5 resections. Despite a difficulty score according to IMM classification comparable in the 3 groups (with high difficulty grade 3 procedures of 16.5% vs. 15.7% vs. 23.1% in Group A, B, and C, respectively, p = 0.124), mean operative time was significantly longer in Group C (p = 0.039). Blood loss amount (p = 0.396) and conversion rate (p = 0.888) were similar in the 3 groups. Rate of R1 margins was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.078). Achievement of TO was not different between groups (p = 0.741). In multivariate analysis, non-achievement of TO was associated with difficulty according to IMM classification (OR = 2.29 (1.33-3.98)). CONCLUSION Since intra- and post-operative outcomes and quality of resection are comparable, multiple liver resections should not preclude the laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Ecoline Tribillon
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Faermark
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Bonnet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guan MC, Wang MD, Liu SY, Ouyang W, Liang L, Pawlik TM, Xu QR, Huang DS, Shen F, Zhu H, Yang T. Early diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: From bench to bedside. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:197-215. [PMID: 33889272 PMCID: PMC8040062 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of patients with HCC remains poor largely due to the late diagnosis and lack of effective treatments. Despite being widely used, alpha-fetoprotein serology and ultrasonography have limited diagnostic performance for early-stage HCC. The emergence of omics strategies has contributed to significant advances in the development of non-invasive biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC including proteins, metabolites, circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, and circulating non-coding ribonucleic acid. Early diagnosis is beneficial to patients as it increases the proportion who can be treated with curative treatment, thus prolonging survival outcomes. Currently, multiple clinical trials involving locoregional, systemic therapies, and combinations of these modalities are changing therapeutic strategies for different stage HCC. Success in several preclinical trials that involve immunotherapeutic innovations has created the potential to complement and enforce other treatment strategies in the future. This review summarizes the most recent advances in non-invasive early molecular detection, current therapy strategies, and potential immunotherapeutic innovations of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Cheng Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ming-Da Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Si-Yu Liu
- Department of Laboratory, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei Ouyang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Lei Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Qiu-Ran Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Navy Medical University), Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ziogas IA, Esagian SM, Giannis D, Hayat MH, Kosmidis D, Matsuoka LK, Montenovo MI, Tsoulfas G, Geller DA, Alexopoulos SP. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An individual patient data survival meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2021; 222:731-738. [PMID: 33840443 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) vs. open hepatectomy (OH) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). METHODS A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using PRISMA guidelines (end-of-search date: 08-June-2020). Individual patient data on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses, and one- and two-stage survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS Eight retrospective cohort studies comparing LH (n = 544) vs. OH (n = 2256) were identified. LH demonstrated lower overall complication (Risk ratio [RR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.90; p = 0.01), surgical lymphadenectomy (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; p = 0.01) and margin-positive resection (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04) rates, and higher recurrence-free rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.51; p = 0.04) vs. OH. In Cox regression, no difference was observed regarding OS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.91; p = 0.70) and RFS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.74-1.90; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION The use of LH should be considered when feasible in well-selected iCCA patients by hepatobiliary surgeons with experience in minimally-invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Stepan M Esagian
- Oncology Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Giannis
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece; Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Northwell Health Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Muhammad H Hayat
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dimitrios Kosmidis
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece; Oncology Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Lea K Matsuoka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Martin I Montenovo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sophoclis P Alexopoulos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Changing trends in hepatocellular carcinoma management: Results from a nationwide database in the last decade. Eur J Cancer 2021; 146:48-55. [PMID: 33582392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have greatly expanded in recent years. However, the actual usage of each of these treatments in clinical routine remains unknown. Here, we analysed the distribution and changes of the main surgical and radiological therapeutic procedures nationwide during the last decade. METHODS Retrospectively, analysis of the data on all >18-year-old patients with a diagnosis of HCC identified in the French Program for the Medicalization of Information Systems database that contains all discharge summaries from all French hospitals. The number and percentage of the therapeutic procedures performed from January 2010 to December 2019 were extracted. RESULTS A total of 68,416 therapeutic procedures were performed in 34,000 HCC patients. Whereas HCC incidence remained stable, the annual number of procedures frankly increased over the decade (from 4267 to 8042). Trans-arterial chemoembolization was the most frequently performed technical procedure, with a double-digit annual growth from 2010 (n = 1932) to 2015 (n = 4085), before stabilization from 2016. Selective internal radiation therapy displayed the highest increase in the decade (+475%). Among curative treatments, the annual number of percutaneous tumour ablations more than doubled in 10 years, till representing 64% of curative treatments in cirrhotic patients in 2019. Surgical tumour resections showed a 1.5-fold increase in 10 years, due to the great increase in minimally invasive approaches, whereas the proportion of open resection progressively decreased. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive procedures have gained major importance in HCC management during the last decade. Percutaneous thermal ablation has emerged as the first curative treatment performed for patients with HCC.
Collapse
|
29
|
Peng Y, Liu F, Xu H, Guo S, Wei Y, Li B. Propensity score matching analysis for outcomes of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobectomy. ANZ J Surg 2020; 91:E168-E173. [PMID: 33377587 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, laparoscopic caudate lobectomy (LCB) remains a challenge, and evidence about its value is rare. Therefore, this study was performed to assess the benefits of LCB for patients with tumours located in the caudate lobe compared with open caudate lobectomy (OCB). METHODS From October 2015 to June 2019, 102 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were eligible for this study. The patients were divided into LCB and OCB groups. Short-term outcomes between the groups were compared with propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS LCB was performed in 31 of the 102 included patients. After PSM, 30 patients with well-balanced baseline levels were enrolled in each group. Intraoperative blood loss in the LCB group was less than that in the OCB group (median, 100 versus 200 mL, P = 0.017), even though it did not reach a statistically significant difference after PSM (median, 100 versus 187.5 mL, P = 0.085). Moreover, although post-operative overall complications were similar in the two groups, a tendency of lower rates of respiratory infection in the LCB group than the OCB group was observed (0% versus 12.7%, P = 0.054 before PSM; 0% versus 16.7%, P = 0.063 after PSM). There was no early mortality in either group. LCB had a shorter post-operative hospital stay than OCB (median, 5 versus 6 days, P < 0.001). However, the hospitalization cost was higher in the LCB group than in the OCB group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION LCB is safe and feasible in selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufu Peng
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongwei Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Suqi Guo
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Response to Comment on "'Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Preoperatively Estimate Post-Hepatectomy Liver Dysfunction Risk and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma': A 'Minimally-Invasive' Step Forward". Ann Surg 2020; 274:e791-e792. [PMID: 33234790 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Is It Time to Consider Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? A Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:2244-2250. [PMID: 31621026 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The role of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains indefinite, though the utilization of this minimally invasive approach has been increasing for ICC. We herein performed a meta-analysis to investigate this issue. METHODS Six retrospective studies including 384 patients who had undergone LH and 2147 patients who had undergone open hepatectomy (OH) for ICC were included. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were utilized for data analysis. RESULTS Compared with patients who had undergone OH for ICC, patients who had undergone LH for ICC experienced more R0 resections (81.6 versus 73.8%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.14; P = 0.008) but less major hepatectomies (37.7 versus 54.2%, RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79; P < 0.0001), less lymph node dissections (38.0 versus 61.5%, RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.70; P < 0.0001), and smaller tumor size resected (4.14 versus 4.94 cm, weighted mean difference = - 0.80 cm, 95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.22 cm; P = 0.007). No significant difference was observed in other perioperative results (all P > 0.05) or overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.38, 95% CI 0.63-3.02; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS LH has comparable safety, feasibility, and oncological efficacy to that of OH for ICC and has superiority in R0 resection over OH. It may be time to consider LH for ICC only if a more thorough effort on lymph node dissection is undertaken in selective patients at experienced centers.
Collapse
|
32
|
Goh BKP, Syn N, Lee SY, Koh YX, Teo JY, Kam JH, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Chow PK, Ooi LL, Chung AY, Chan CY. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5231-5238. [PMID: 32974782 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimal invasive liver resection (MILR) remains controversial and current difficulty scoring systems do not take in to account the presence of cirrhosis as a significant factor in determining the difficulty of MILR. We hypothesized that the difficulty of MILR is affected by the presence of cirrhosis. Hence, we performed a 1:1 matched-controlled study comparing the outcomes between patients undergoing MILR with and without cirrhosis including the Iwate system and Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM) system in the matching process. METHODS Between 2006 and 2019, 598 consecutive patients underwent MILR of which 536 met the study inclusion criteria. There were 148 patients with cirrhosis and 388 non-cirrhotics. One-to-one coarsened exact matching identified approximately exact matches between 100 cirrhotic patients and 100 non-cirrhotic patients. RESULTS Comparison between MILR patients with cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis in the entire cohort demonstrated that patients with cirrhosis were associated with a significantly increased open conversion rate, transfusion rate, need for Pringles maneuver, postoperative, stay, postoperative morbidity and postoperative 90-day mortality. After 1:1 coarsened exact matching, MILR with cirrhosis were significantly associated with an increased open conversion rate (15% vs 6%, p = 0.03), operation time (261 vs 238 min, p < 0.001), blood loss (607 vs 314 mls, p = 0.002), transfusion rate (22% vs 9%, p = 0.001), need for application of Pringles maneuver (51% vs 34%, p = 0.010), postoperative stay (6 vs 4.5 days, p = 0.004) and postoperative morbidity (26% vs 13%, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION The presence of liver cirrhosis affected both the intraoperative technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of MILR and hence should be considered an important parameter to be included in future difficulty scoring systems for MILR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. .,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ser-Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Juinn-Huar Kam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prema-Raj Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pierce K Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - London L Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hepatocellular carcinoma in adult thalassemia patients: an expert opinion based on current evidence. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:251. [PMID: 32746786 PMCID: PMC7398335 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01391-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Beta-thalassemia represents a heterogeneous group of haemoglobin inherited disorders, among the most common genetic diseases in the world, frequent in the Mediterranean basin. As beta-thalassemia patients' survival has increased over time, previously unknown complications are observed with increasing frequency. Among them, an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been registered. Our aim is to reduce inequalities in diagnosis and treatment and to offer patients univocal recommendations in any institution.The members of the panel - gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and oncologists -were selected on the basis of their publication records and expertise. Thirteen clinical questions, derived from clinical needs, and an integration of all the committee members' suggestions, were formulated. Modified Delphi approach involving a detailed literature review and the collective judgement of experts, was applied to this work.Thirteen statements were derived from expert opinions' based on the current literature, on recently developed reviews and on technological advancements. Each statement is discussed in a short paragraph reporting the current key evidence. As this is an emerging issue, the number of papers on HCC in beta-thalassemia patients is limited and based on anecdotal cases rather than on randomized controlled studies. Therefore, the panel has discussed, step by step, the possible differences between beta-thalassemia and non beta-thalassemia patients. Despite the paucity of the literature, practical and concise statements were generated.This paper offers a practical guide organized by statements describing how to manage HCC in patients with beta-thalassemia.
Collapse
|
34
|
Allaire M, Goumard C, Lim C, Le Cleach A, Wagner M, Scatton O. New frontiers in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2020; 2:100134. [PMID: 32695968 PMCID: PMC7360891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is one of the main curative options for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis and is the treatment of choice in non-cirrhotic patients. However, careful patient selection is required to balance the risk of postoperative liver failure and the potential benefit on long-term outcomes. In the last decades, improved surgical techniques and perioperative management, as well as better patient selection, have enabled the indications for liver resection to be expanded. In this review, we aim to describe the main indications for liver resection in the management of HCC, its role compared to percutaneous ablation and liver transplantation in the therapeutic algorithm, as well as the recent advances in liver surgery that could be used to improve the prognosis of patients with HCC.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALPPS, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
- BCLC, Barcelona Clinic liver cancer
- CSPH, clinically significant portal hypertension
- DFS, disease-free survival
- GSA, galactosyl serum albumin
- HCC
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HVGP, hepatic venous pression gradient
- ICG, indocyanine green
- ICG-R15, hepatic clearance of ICG 15 minutes after its intravenous administration
- IL-6, interleukin 6
- LR, liver resection
- LSM, liver stiffness measurement
- Laparoscopy
- Liver resection
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- OS, overall survival
- PVL, portal vein ligation
- PVTT, tumour-related portal vein thrombosis
- RFA, radiofrequency ablation
- SSM, spleen stiffness measurement
- Surgery
- TACE, transarterial chemoembolisation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Allaire
- Sorbonne Université, Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, France Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Claire Goumard
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Chetana Lim
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Aline Le Cleach
- Sorbonne Université, Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Wagner
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Service de Radiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Sorbonne Université, CRSA, Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et transplantation hépatique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Campani C, Bensi C, Milani S, Galli A, Tarocchi M. Resection of NAFLD-Associated HCC: Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2020; 7:107-116. [PMID: 32802809 PMCID: PMC7398743 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s252506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been growing in the last decades, especially in western countries, due to increased prevalence of diabetes, obesity or other components of metabolic syndrome. NAFLD recently became an important cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in non-cirrhotic patients. Patients with HCC-NAFLD are usually older, with more morbidities (especially cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders) and have advanced disease at the diagnosis due to the absence of surveillance, which is considered not cost-effective in patients without advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, given the large prevalence of NAFLD in the general population. For these reasons, patients with HCC-NAFLD unlikely underwent curative treatments, and have been reported to have lower overall survival (OS) compared to individuals with HCC related to other aetiologies. However, this difference is not confirmed by data of patient subgroups who received curative treatment. In our review, we selected studies published over the past 8 years that analyse characteristics and outcomes of HCC-NAFLD patients who underwent surgery with the aim of identifying features that could predict outcomes and potential selection criteria. All the studies confirm that patients with HCC-NAFLD are older, with many comorbidities and that HCC occurs frequently even in non-cirrhotic livers. There is no agreement about intraoperative and perioperative complications. Regarding outcomes, all papers agree that patients with HCC in NAFLD who undergo surgery have a better OS compared to other aetiologies. Summarizing, surgery is a good curative option for patients with HCC-NAFLD, perhaps even better than transplantation in terms of OS. In this group of patients, it seems to be essential to evaluate cardio-pulmonary and general operative risk, in addition to the normal risk assessment related to liver function to avoid an underestimation, especially for patients without severe underlying fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Campani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carolina Bensi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Milani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Galli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mirko Tarocchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Navarro JG, Kang I, Rho SY, Choi GH, Han DH, Kim KS, Choi JS. Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons' Learning Curve. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:447-458. [PMID: 32602059 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08764-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical complications for surgeons still in the learning phase of major laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have been frequently observed. We aimed to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery based on the surgeons' learning curve for LLR after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. METHODS This was a retrospective study of all patients with a histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent major hepatectomy between January 2013 and December 2018. A PSM analysis was used to compare the groups of patients who underwent LLR and open major liver resection (OLR) before and after the learning curve was maximized. RESULTS Among 405 patients, 106 underwent LLR and 299 underwent OLR. The learning curve was maximized after 42 cases. Compared with OLR, LLR had more liver-related injury and grade III or higher complications during the learning phase. The LLR group had less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements, and fewer liver-related complications during the 'experienced' phase. Hospital stay was significantly shorter during and after maximization of the learning curve in LLR compared with OLR. Operative time was comparable in the two phases. Overall, LLR was associated with less blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS LLR had a higher incidence of liver-related complications during the surgeon's learning phase compared with OLR. This association was significantly diminished with surgeon experience. Overall perioperative outcomes such as estimated blood loss, surgical complications, and hospital stay remained better for LLR compared with OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Geograpo Navarro
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines
| | - Incheon Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seoung Yoon Rho
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nahon P, Vibert E, Nault JC, Ganne-Carrié N, Ziol M, Seror O. Optimizing curative management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2020; 40 Suppl 1:109-115. [PMID: 32077602 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The goal of curative management of hepatocellular carcinoma is to provide the best chance of remission. However, recurrence rates for both local and distant relapse are high. Patient subgroups at higher risk of these events can be identified based on histological patterns that are closely linked to specific molecular subtypes. Patient outcome has improved with more effective therapeutic strategies thanks to technological advances in surgical techniques and percutaneous ablation. The main goal of controlling the cause of liver disease is to decrease distant/late recurrence and prevent deterioration of hepatic function. Ongoing trials testing the combination of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant regimens with these procedures as well as routine tumour molecular analysis may modify therapeutic algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Nahon
- Service d'Hépatologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.,"Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Saint-Denis, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris 13, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Departement de Chirurgie, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, DHU Hepatinov, INSERM, Unit 1193, Univ Paris-Saclay, UMR-S 1193, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Charles Nault
- Service d'Hépatologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.,"Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Saint-Denis, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris 13, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne-Carrié
- Service d'Hépatologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.,"Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Saint-Denis, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris 13, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, Paris, France
| | - Marianne Ziol
- "Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Saint-Denis, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris 13, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, Paris, France.,Service d'Anatomo-Pathologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - Olivier Seror
- "Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer", Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Saint-Denis, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris 13, Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, Paris, France.,Service de Radiologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Advances in resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2020; 72:262-276. [PMID: 31954491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
It would be impossible to summarise all of the significant developments in the surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even just over the past year, in a manuscript of this scope. Thus, we have selected topics for discussion that are the subject of current controversy and have attempted to present balanced points of view. Hepatic resection and transplantation are both mature modalities, and for the most part technical advances and improvements in candidate selection are incremental. The ability to readily cure hepatitis C stands out as the most impactful development in the field over recent years, especially in Western countries where hepatitis C has long been the chief aetiology underlying HCC and a predictor of poor outcomes after surgery, but its full implications remain to be clarified. The rising incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related HCC and what it means with regard to surgical HCC management is an area of great current interest. With advancing technology, non-surgical locoregional treatments are gaining increasing application as potentially curative therapies. In addition, the advances in molecular and genomic assessment of HCC hold promise for personalising treatment and prognostication. The possible role of immunotherapy as an adjuvant to resection is being aggressively investigated. While liver surgery maintains an important role, the care of patients with HCC is more and more a team effort and needs to take place in the context of a well-integrated interdisciplinary programme to achieve the best outcomes for patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
Shiraiwa DK, Carvalho PFDC, Maeda CT, Silva LC, Forones NM, Lopes-Filho GJ, Linhares MM, Araujo RLC. The role of minimally invasive hepatectomy for hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:863-872. [PMID: 31902142 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite the fact laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) for cholangiocarcinoma is still limited, this systematic review addressed surgical and oncological outcomes of LLR to treat both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Five comparative and 20 noncomparative studies were found. Regarding iCCA, LLR had lower blood loss and less need for Pringle maneuver. However, open liver resections (OLR) were performed more for major hepatectomies, with better lymphadenectomy rates and higher number of harvested lymph nodes. High heterogeneity and selection bias were suggested for iCCA studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Shiraiwa
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Carlos T Maeda
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciana C Silva
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nora M Forones
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gaspar J Lopes-Filho
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo M Linhares
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raphael L C Araujo
- Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3910-3918. [PMID: 31451921 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07071-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for lesions located in posterosuperior (PS) segments remains a matter of development to be further assessed. This systematic review aims to compare the short-term and oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection (OLR) in PS lesions. METHODS EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched from date of inception to June 2019. This meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 statistical software. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for continuous variables, dichotomous variables and long-term variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 788 patients from eight studies were identified for the final analysis, with 371 patients in the LLR group and 417 in the OLR group. Although the operation time (SMD 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.36; P = 0.003) was longer whereas overall complication rate (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.70; P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (SMD - 0.45; 95% CI - 0.59 to - 0.30; P = 0.003) were lower in the LLR group than in the OLR group, no significant differences in blood loss (SMD - 0.14; 95% CI - 0.28 to 0.00; P = 0.054), transfusion rate (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.56-1.54; P = 0.764), major complication rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.38-1.05; P = 0.079), R0 resection rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.96; P = 0.902), and disease-free survival (DFS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.95-2.17), DFS for colorectal liver metastases (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.61-1.81), overall survival for HCC (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.43-2.30) were noted between the groups. CONCLUSION LLR is technically feasible and safe without compromising long-term oncological outcomes for selected patients with lesions in the PS segments of the liver.
Collapse
|