Obesity is a risk factor for internal hernia after laparoscopic or robot-assisted gastrectomy with mesenteric defect closure for gastric cancer

Petersen's hernia after gastric cancer surgery: Unravelling clinical characteristics and optimal management approaches

INTRODUCTION

Petersen's hernia is a rare and serious complication that can occur after radical gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction for gastric cancer. This article summarises the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of Petersen's hernia after surgery for gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 11 male patients who were diagnosed with Petersen's hernia and underwent surgical treatment at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. Their clinical manifestations, perioperative conditions and follow-up after treatment were collected.

RESULTS

The median age was 58.5 years (range: 45-73), and the median time since gastrectomy was 24 months (range: 4-125). Open distal gastrectomy (45.5%) and open total gastrectomy (27.3%) were the most common procedures. Roux-en-Y (81.8%) was the predominant anastomosis method. All patients underwent emergency surgery within a median time of 30 h (range: 4-45). Intestine necrosis occurred in 36.4% of cases, with a perioperative death rate of 27.3%.

CONCLUSION

Petersen's hernia after gastric cancer surgery can quickly lead to necrotising intestinal obstruction and poor prognosis. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography should be performed as soon as possible, and early exploratory laparotomy should be done to avoid intestinal necrosis. Routine closure of the mesenteric defect after gastric cancer resection can prevent the occurrence of Petersen's hernia. This article highlights the need for increased awareness and preventive measures to minimise the occurrence of Petersen's hernia in gastric cancer patients. It emphasises the importance of early detection and appropriate management strategies for improved patient outcomes.

Association between the antiadhesion membrane and small bowel obstruction after open gastrectomy: A supplemental analysis of the randomized controlled JCOG1001 trial

Aim

Postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the major complications that is mainly caused by postoperative adhesion. Recently, the antiadhesion membrane has become popular for postoperative SBO prevention. However, its efficacy is yet to be confirmed in the gastric cancer surgery field. Here, we conducted the supplemental analysis of the randomized controlled trial JCOG1001 to investigate the efficacy of the antiadhesion membrane on SBO prevention in patients with open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

Of the 1204 patients enrolled in JCOG1001, 1200 patients were included. The development of SBO of Grade ≥ IIIa according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was recorded. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using the Fine and Gray model to determine the risk factors for SBO.

Results

Fifty-one patients developed SBO (median follow-up duration: 5.6 years). Total gastrectomy, combined resection, and blood loss significantly increased the risk for SBO development in the univariable analysis. Large amount of blood loss was independently associated with SBO development in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 3.089; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.562-6.109, p = 0.0012). Antiadhesion membrane did not reduce the risk for SBO (HR, 1.299; 95% CI 0.683-2.470; p = 0.4246). In the patients belonging to subgroup analyses who received distal and total gastrectomy, the antiadhesion membrane was not associated with the incidence of SBO.

Conclusions

Antiadhesion membrane did not decrease SBO occurrence rate after open gastrectomy. Therefore, the use of antiadhesion membrane would not be effective for preventing SBO in gastric cancer surgery.

Associations of radiological features of adipose tissues with postoperative complications and overall survival of gastric cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the associations of the radiological features of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) with the postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

One hundred forty-two patients underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from February 2013 to May 2016. The radiological features of SAT and VAT were studied by preoperative computed tomography, and the relationships between the parameters of adipose tissues and the intraoperative and postoperative conditions and OS rate of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

A positive linear correlation was found between VAT area and operation duration, and a negative linear correlation was found between VAT density and intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05 in both). VAT area was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. VAT area and VAT density were independent risk factors for OS in gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A high VAT area was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications of gastric cancer, whereas a low VAT area and high VAT density were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in terms of OS in gastric cancer.

KEY POINTS

• A large visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area is an unfavourable factor affecting the outcomes of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. • Low VAT density may be more likely to cause intraoperative bleeding. • VAT area and VAT density were independent risk factors for the OS of patients with gastric cancer.

A pilot study on preoperative vascular anatomy and clinical application in rectal cancer resection

AIM

To assess the utility of preoperatively evaluating the vascular anatomy using multisection spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) and image fusion technology in the treatment of obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomised prospective study included 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the fusion imaging group (preoperative CTA and image fusion reconstruction [n=28]) and the control group (not performed CTA and image fusion reconstruction before the operation [n=28]). Duration of surgery was defined as the primary endpoint, and the volume of bleeding, the number of lymph node dissections, conversion to laparotomy, time to recovery of postoperative flatus, length of hospitalisation as well as perioperative complications were defined as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the duration of surgery in the image fusion group was shorter, bleeding volume was reduced, and the number of lymph node dissections was greater (p<0.05); however, there was no significant differences between the two groups regarding time to postoperative flatus recovery, conversion to laparotomy, length of hospitalisation, and perioperative complications (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative assessment of the vascular anatomy was an effective method and avoided some invisible risks during surgery, and resulted in a better therapeutic effect.

Risk Factor and Surgical Outcome of Petersen's Hernia After Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer

Background

Petersen’s hernia is a life-threatening complication after gastrectomy. This study is dedicated to identify risk factors for Petersen’s hernia and compare clinical outcomes between patients receiving early or delayed surgical interventions.

Methods

Data from all patients who received gastrectomy due to gastric cancer were collected. Clinical characteristics were compared between Petersen and non-Petersen groups, bowel necrosis and non-necrotic groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to generate two comparative groups. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed for risk factor evaluation.

Results

A total of 24 cases of Petersen’s hernia were identified from 1,481 cases of gastrectomy. PSM demonstrated that lower body mass index [BMI; odds ratio (OR) = 0.2, p < 0.01] and distal gastrectomy (OR = 6.2, p = 0.011) were risk factors for Petersen’s hernia. Longer time interval from emergence visit to laparotomy (p = 0.042) and elevated preoperative procalcitonin (p = 0.033) and C-reactive protein (CRP; p = 0.012) were associated with higher risk of bowel necrosis in Petersen’s hernia. Early surgical intervention resulted in less bowel necrosis rate (p = 0.012) and shorter length of necrotic bowel (p = 0.0041).

Conclusions

Low BMI and distal gastrectomy are independent risk factor for Petersen’s hernia after gastrectomy. Curtailing observing time and executing prompt surgery are associated with bowel viability and better outcome in patients with Petersen’s hernia.

Closure of Petersen's defect in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interrupted time series analysis from a high-volume institution in China

PURPOSE

Petersen's hernia (PH) is a serious complication after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether closure of Petersen's defect (PD) can decrease the rates of PH and suspected Petersen's hernia (SPH).

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy with PD were enrolled. From January 2014 to January 2017, we performed gastrectomy without PD closure (non-closure group). From February 2017 to June 2018, we closed PDs during gastrectomy (closure group). The rates of PH and SPH were compared between the two groups. The last follow-up was updated in August 2020.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1213 patients, 12 patients (1.0%) developed PH, and 23 patients (1.9%) developed SPH. The rate of PH in the closure group was significantly lower than that in the non-closure group (1/385, 0.3% versus 11/828, 1.3%, p = 0.042, log-rank test). The rate of SPH in the closure group was significantly lower than that in the non-closure group (1/385, 0.3% versus 22/828, 2.7%, p = 0.008, log-rank test). Non-closure of PD was a risk factor for PH and SPH (odds ratio (OR) 7.72, 95% CI 1.84-32.35, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

PD closure is recommended after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, as the rates of PH and SPH were significantly decreased.

A simple, novel laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy technique to prevent bowel obstruction after esophagectomy: the "curtain method"

BACKGROUND

Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is a common treatment to support patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy. However, severe FJ-related complications, such as bowel obstruction, occasionally occur. We investigated the ability of our simple, novel FJ technique, the "curtain method," to prevent bowel obstruction.

METHODS

In laparoscopic surgery, the main mechanism of bowel obstruction involves torsion of the mesentery accompanied by migration of the intestine across the fixed FJ through the space surrounded by a triangle comprising the ligament of Treitz, fixed FJ, and spleen rather than adhesion. Our "curtain method" involves closure of this triangle zone with omentum, and the appearance of the lifted omentum resembles a curtain. Sixty patients treated with this modified FJ were retrospectively compared with 13 patients treated with conventional FJ in terms of the incidence of bowel obstruction, peritonitis, stoma site infection, and catheter obstruction.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, 60 patients underwent esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction accompanied by modified laparoscopic FJ. The median observation period, including the period after tube removal, was 644 days. No FJ-associated bowel obstruction, the prevention of which was the primary aim, occurred in any patient. Likewise, no peritonitis or dislodgement occurred. Eight patients (13%) developed a stoma site infection with granulation. The feeding tube became occluded in 11 patients (18%); however, a new feeding tube was reinserted under fluoroscopy for all of these patients. From 2003 to 2012, 13 patients underwent conventional FJ. The median observation period was 387 days. Three patients (23%) developed bowel obstruction by torsion 71 to 134 days after the first surgery, and all were treated by emergency operations. Other FJ-related complications were not different from those in the modified FJ group.

CONCLUSION

Our simple, novel technique, the "curtain method," for prevention of laparoscopic FJ-associated bowel obstruction after esophagectomy is a safe additional surgery.

Diaphragmatic herniation following total gastrectomy: review of the long-term experience of a tertiary institution

PURPOSE

Diaphragmatic herniation (DH) is a rare but potentially fatal event after total gastrectomy (TG). Despite being life-threatening, risk factors for postoperative DH have yet to be elucidated. We conducted a retrospective analysis to identify clinical characteristics of patients developing DH after TG, along with a comprehensive review of the published literature.

METHODS

Among 1361 consecutive patients undergoing TG for esophagogastric cancer between 1985 and 2013 in Toranomon Hospital, those requiring surgical intervention for postoperative DH were included. We also conducted a PubMed literature search on DH following TG.

RESULTS

Five patients (four males, one female), with a median age of 68 at DH surgery, were identified. Intervals between TG and DH repair ranged from 2.9 to 189.0 (median, 78.1) months. Four patients had needed emergency surgery. Three patients had undergone open TG and two others laparoscopic TG, suggesting a significantly higher incidence of DH after laparoscopic TG (3/1302 vs. 2/59, p = 0.017). The diaphragmatic crus incision, creating the space for esophagojejunostomy, had been performed in all cases. The literature yielded seven relevant publications (16 patients). Intervals between TG and DH reduction ranged from 2 days to 36 months. All operations for DH had been carried out emergently.

CONCLUSION

The risk of DH persisted after TG. DH is potentially a very late complication of TG, presenting as a surgical emergency. Laparoscopic TG was suggested to be a risk factor for postgastrectomy DH. Incising the crus might also be a predictor of DH. Measures to prevent DH, e.g., appropriate closure of the crus, would be recommended in minimally invasive TG.