Analgesic efficacy of pre-emptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results from a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, non-inferiority trial

Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Strategy for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have substantially proven their merit in diminishing recuperation durations and mitigating postoperative adverse events in geriatric populations undergoing colorectal cancer procedures. Despite this, the pivotal aspect of postoperative pain control has not garnered the commensurate attention it deserves. Typically, employing a multimodal analgesia regimen that weaves together nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, local anesthetics, and nerve blocks stands paramount in curtailing surgical complications and facilitating reduced convalescence within hospital confines. Nevertheless, this integrative pain strategy is not devoid of pitfalls; the specter of organ dysfunction looms over the geriatric cohort, rooted in the abuse of analgesics or the complex interplay of polypharmacy. Revolutionary research is delving into alternative delivery and release modalities, seeking to allay the inadvertent consequences of analgesia and thereby potentially elevating postoperative outcomes for the elderly post-colorectal cancer surgery populace. This review examines the dual aspects of multimodal analgesia regimens by comparing their established benefits with potential limitations and offers insight into the evolving strategies of drug administration and release.

The Influence of Analgesic Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Inflammatory Cytokines in Open Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Comparative Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: Surgical wound analgesia has been analyzed in many studies, but few have focused on its relationship with inflammatory markers. As such, we aimed to determine the influence of analgesic surgical wound infiltration in open colorectal surgery on the seric levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and the associated efficacy in postoperative pain control. Materials and Methods: Forty patients who underwent open colorectal surgery were prospectively randomized: group 0, epidural analgesia; group 1, intravenous analgesia (control), group 2, preincision and prelaparoraphy infiltration; and, group 3, prelaparoraphy infiltration. Wound infiltration was performed with ropivacaine. We analyzed the levels of IL-6 and IL-10 cytokines before and 6 h after surgery and their correlation with pain scores. Results: The postoperative Il-6 levels were significantly lower in group 0 than in the control (p = 0.041). The postoperative Il-10 levels were significantly higher in group 3 (p = 0.029) than in the control. Six hours after the operation, the pain scores were significantly lower in all groups than in the control (p = 0.005, p = 0.022, and p = 0.017 for groups 0, 2, and 3, respectively). Pain scores were significantly correlated with Il-10 levels in group 2 (p = 0.047); in group 3, IL-10 levels directly correlated with those of Il-6 (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The analgetic effect of preincisional and prelaparoraphy analgetic infiltration was efficient. The analgetic infiltration of the surgical wound prior to closure stimulates both the inflammatory activator and regulator interleukins.

PROcedure-SPECific postoperative pain management guideline for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic review with recommendations for postoperative pain management

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in women and third most common in men. Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique worldwide given its notable benefits, mainly the shorter length of stay and less postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and update previous procedure-specific pain management recommendations. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. We also considered study quality, clinical relevance of trial design, and a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment of the analgesic intervention. We performed a literature search to identify randomised controlled studies (RCTs) published before January 2022. Seventy-two studies were included in the present analysis. Through the established PROSPECT process, we recommend basic analgesia (paracetamol for rectal surgery, and paracetamol with either a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor for colonic surgery) and wound infiltration as first-line interventions. No consensus could be achieved either for the use of intrathecal morphine or intravenous lidocaine; no recommendation can be made for these interventions. However, intravenous lidocaine may be considered when basic analgesia cannot be provided.

Artificial intelligent patient-controlled intravenous analgesia improves the outcomes of older patients with laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer from July 2019 to May 2021 were selected. The patients were assigned to Ai-PCIA group and control group. Ai-PCIA group received postoperative analgesia management and effect evaluation through intelligent wireless analgesia system + postoperative follow-up twice a day, while control group received analgesia management and effect evaluation through ward physician feedback + postoperative follow-up twice a day. The pain numerical score (NRS), Richards-Campbell Sleep Scale (RCSQ), and adverse outcomes were collected and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (20 females and 40 males with average (78.26 ± 6.42) years old) were included. The NRS scores at rest and during activity of the Ai-PCA group at 8, 12, and 24 h after the operation were significantly lower than that of the control group (all P < 0.05). The RCSQ score of Ai-PCA group was significantly higher than that of control group on the 1st and 2nd days after operation (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness and nausea, vomiting, and myocardial ischemia (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ai-PCIA can improve the analgesic effect and sleep quality of older patients after laparoscopic radical resection, which may be promoted in clinical analgesia practice.

The impact of laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy on clinical outcomes of splenic flexure colon cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention is the recommended line for the management of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different surgical techniques (laparoscopic, open, extended right, and left colectomy) on clinical outcomes such as mortality, postoperative complications, operation and hospitalization time, and oncological factors.

METHODS

A total of 15 studies have been included in the current study. The outcomes of these studies were analyzed using a random-effect model and it was used to calculate the mean difference with 95% confidence intervals to quantify the impact of open, laparoscopic, extended right, and left colectomy. Inclusion criteria included studies in which subjects undergo splenic flexure colon cancer surgery with 2 comparable different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact on the length of hospital stay (P < .001), the volume of blood loss during surgery (P < .001), postoperative complications (P < .001), and time to an oral diet (P < .001). On the other hand, there was no significance regarding anastomotic leakage, infection of the surgical site, and operation time. Regarding the comparison between extended right colectomy (ERC) and lift colectomy (LC), analysis findings showed a significant (P = .001) higher efficacy of ERC in harvested number of lymph nodes compared with LC. On the other hand, there was no significant difference for the rest of the parameters. The neoadjuvant therapy as an influencing factor on postoperative outcome showed a beneficial impact regarding the overall survival rate.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenic flexure colon cancer surgery showed a significant beneficial impact compared with open surgery as proved by clinical outcomes. On the other hand, ERC and LC resulted in similar findings except for harvested lymph nodes, results were in favor of ERC.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open colectomy for splenic flexure colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study examined the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open splenic flexure colon cancer (SFCC) surgery.

METHOD

Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed and Ovid to compare laparoscopic and open colectomy for SFCC. The last search was conducted on November 7, 2021. Surgical and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3).

RESULTS

This study included seven publications with 2397 patients published between 2011 and 2021. A significant difference in operative time was seen in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.01, WMD = 50.13, 95%CI [10.32, 89.94], I² = 97%); loss of blood estimated (P < 0.001, WMD =  -101.88, 95%CI [-161.65, -42.11], I² = 82%) and the incidence of overall complications (P < 0.001, OR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.38, 0.75], I² = 0%) of laparoscopic procedure were greatly decreased. There were similar results as compared in the two groups in terms of lymph node harvesting (P = 0.71, WMD = 0.49, 95%CI [-2.13, 3.12], I² = 93%) and the distance of proximal (P = 0.50, WMD =  -1.09, 95%CI [-4.26, 2.08], I² = 96%) or distal (P = 0.18, WMD = 2.44, 95%CI [-1.13, 6.01], I² = 97%) resection margin. In addition, no significant differences were observed on overall/disease-free survival over 3/5 years between the two procedures. An analysis of subgroups that used propensity matching scores produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic procedure is clinically safe and feasible for SFCC. It shows the advantages in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and overall complications, and the long-term survival outcomes would not be affected. Randomized clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted in the future for further investigation.