Predictive factors for difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia including failure of en bloc resection or perforation

Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection close to the initial endoscopic submucosal dissection scar for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for metachronous recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma close to previous endoscopic submucosal dissection scars is challenging. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

The study included 1680 patients. After propensity score matching, esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection-related outcomes were compared between the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar group (n = 91) and first endoscopic submucosal dissection group (n = 910). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare both groups' survival and local recurrence curves.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the two groups showed no significant difference in en bloc resection rate (97.80% vs. 99.56%, p = 0.096), treatment time (64.75 min vs 61.33 min, p = 0.448), recurrence rate (3.30% vs. 2.20%, p = 0.458), and stricture rate (7.69% vs. 4.07%, p = 0.110). However, the perforation rate was higher in the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar group than in the first endoscopic submucosal dissection group (4.40% vs. 1.10%, p = 0.031). The 5-year overall survival rates in the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar and first endoscopic submucosal dissection groups were 88.6% and 89.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and survival rates. Therefore, repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection may effectively treat esophageal squamous cell carcinoma recurrence close to the initial endoscopic submucosal dissection scars.

Assessment of predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japanese multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is performed for the treatment of lesions with varied backgrounds and factors. However, the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD remain unknown in patients with varied lesions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD for ESCC using a retrospective cohort.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 10 hospitals in Japan. Consecutive patients who underwent esophageal ESD between January 2013 and December 2019 were enrolled. Lesions of subepithelial tumors, adenocarcinoma, and adenoma were excluded. Difficult lesions were defined as ESD requiring a long procedure time (≥120 min), perforation development, piecemeal resection, or discontinued ESD. In the present study, the clinical factors were assessed to identify the technical difficulty of ESD using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1708 lesions treated with esophageal ESD, eight subepithelial tumors, 44 adenocarcinomas, and two adenomas were excluded. Finally, 1505 patients with 1654 lesions were analyzed, and 217 patients with 217 lesions (13.1%) were classified as patients with difficult lesions. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD were as follows: tumors with varices, tumors with diverticulum, antiplatelet use (discontinued), circumference of tumor (≥1/2), preoperative tumor size ≥30 mm, trainee, and nonhigh-volume center.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter retrospective study identified the predictive factors associated with the technical difficulty of ESD for ESCC with varied backgrounds and factors.

Predictors of technical difficulty for trainees in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging, especially for trainees, and requires a safe training system. This study aimed to identify predictors of technical difficulty facing trainees performing esophageal ESD to establish such system.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent ESD performed by trainees between January 2010 and August 2022. Technical difficulties were defined as muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time (≥ 90 min). Factors associated with these technical difficulties were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 798 lesions in 721 patients were evaluated. Muscularis propria exposure occurred in 298 lesions (37.3%), including 10 perforations (1.3%). The procedure time was ≥ 90 min in 134 lesions (16.8%). In the multivariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 20 mm, tumors ≥ 1/2 of the circumference, and those close to previous treatment scars significantly increased the incidence of both difficulties, whereas tumors in the upper esophagus significantly decreased this incidence. Furthermore, female sex and tumors in the left wall were independent predictors of muscularis propria exposure, and elevated morphology was an independent predictor of long procedure time. Muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time occurred in more than half of the cases with three or more predictors of each difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

Large tumors and tumors close to previous treatment scars increase technical difficulties for trainees in esophageal ESD. Conversely, tumors in the upper esophagus reduce these difficulties. These results enable us to predict the difficulty level preoperatively and select appropriate cases in stepwise training.

Assessment of efficacy and safety of advanced endoscopic irreversible electroporation catheter in the esophagus

Nonthermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) is emerging as a promising tissue ablation technique. However, maintaining irreversible electroporation (IRE) electrodes against displacement during strong esophageal spasms remains an obstacle. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of newly designed balloon-type endoscopic IRE catheters. Six pigs were randomly allocated to each catheter group, and each pig was subjected to four ablations at alternating voltages of 1500 V and 2000 V. Esophagogastroscopy was performed during the IRE. The ability of balloon-type catheters to execute complete IRE with 40 pulses was assessed. The success rate was higher for the balloon-type catheter than that for the basket-type (12/12 [100%] vs. 2/12 [16.7%], p < 0.001). Following gross inspection and histologic analysis of the 1500-V vs. 2000-V balloon-type catheter revealed a larger mucosal damage area (105.3 mm2 vs. 140.8 mm2, p = 0.004) and greater damage depth (476 μm vs. 900 μm, p = 0.02). Histopathology of the ablated tissue revealed separated epithelium, inflamed lamina propria, congested muscularis mucosa, necrotized submucosa, and disorganized muscularis propria. Balloon-type catheters demonstrated efficacy, achieving full electrical pulse sequences under NTIRE conditions, and a safe histological profile below 2000 V (1274 V/cm). Optimal electrical conditions and electrode arrays pose ongoing challenges.

Efficacy of lidocaine injection method for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative body movements are one of the causes of difficulty in performing esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) under conscious sedation. The use of local anesthetics as local injection materials during ESD may overcome this difficulty. We clinically evaluated the lidocaine injection method (LIM) in the submucosa during esophageal ESD.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Patients who underwent esophageal ESD under conscious sedation from June 2018 to May 2021 were included in this study. In the LIM group, lidocaine was used for submucosal injection during ESD; in the control group, ESD was performed without lidocaine. The primary outcome was the presence of body movements.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio in two groups. The incidence of body movements was significantly lower in the LIM group (12% [3/25]) than in the control group (48% [12/25]; P = 0.01). The median additional dose of midazolam was 2 mg (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.5-4 mg) in the LIM group and 4 mg (IQR: 3-6 mg) in the control group, which was significantly lower in the LIM group (P < 0.01). The median visual analog scale score for endoscopist satisfaction was 7 (IQR: 5-8) in the LIM group and 5 (IQR: 4-6.5) in the control group, which was significantly higher in the LIM group.

CONCLUSIONS

LIM during esophageal ESD reduced body movements while decreasing the level of sedation. Therefore, LIM during esophageal ESD is an option for maintaining good sedation (UMIN000032804).

Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy

Simple Summary

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy have not been established. In this study, we focused on the fibrosis of the submucosa. As a result, we found that endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer can be performed reliably without adverse events, but the procedure takes longer for lesions with strong fibrosis of the submucosa.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is a treatment of choice for a metachronous early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) appearing after a radical cure of esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, non-curative resection, and procedural complications including perforation due to radiation-induced submucosal fibrosis, are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between submucosal fibrosis and the usefulness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in ESCC after CRT. This study retrospectively analyzed 13 lesions in 11 patients in our institute. Submucosal fibrosis under the lesion (F score) was classified into three levels (F0: none or mild, F1: moderate, and F2: severe) based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. All lesions were F1 or greater (F1: 8 lesions and F2: 5 lesions). En bloc and R0 resection rates were both 100%. The procedural speed was slower in F2 than in F1 (F1 vs. F2; 15.1 mm²/min vs. 7.1 mm²/min, p = 0.019), without procedure-related adverse events. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 14–117 months) after ESD, 7 of 11 (63.6%) patients were alive without recurrence, and without ESCC-related death. ESCC after CRT reliably and safely resected en bloc by ESD but was more difficult in lesions with strong submucosal fibrosis.

Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors: a long-term retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment method for gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs), but endoscopic resection failure requires emergency surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess potential risk factors for endoscopic resection failure.

METHODS

A total of 1041 patients with G-SMT undergoing endoscopic resection were enrolled. Twenty-five patients in whom endoscopic resection failed, requiring a transition to surgery midway through the operation, were included in the failed group, and 1016 patients who received successful endoscopic resection were included in the successful endoscopic resection group. Baseline and lesion characteristics were recorded, and the differences in tumor characteristics and risk factors for resection failure of G-SMT were analyzed. Sensitivity analysis was performed to detect the stability of the indicator.

RESULTS

Of the 1041cases included, there were 25 cases (2.4%) of failed endoscopic resection. Binary logistic analysis showed that the independent risk factors included tumors originating from deep muscularis propria(OR = 14.42, 95% CI 4.47-46.52), size > 3 cm (OR = 7.75, 95% CI 2.64-22.70), exophytic growth pattern (OR = 4.98, 95% CI 1.62-15.29), endoscopist with less experience (OR = 5.99, 95% CI 1.07-12.19), and irregular borders (OR = 4.13, 95% CI 1.40-12.19). The stable risk factors were tumors size, tumor origin and growth pattern according to sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors originating from the deep muscularis propria, tumor size > 3 cm, endoscopists with less experience, an exophytic growth pattern, and irregular boundaries were found to be independent risk factors for endoscopic resection failure. To reduce the risk of endoscopic resection failure, physicians should carefully evaluate G-SMT characteristics preoperative.

Propensity-score matched analysis to evaluate efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer in gastrectomized patients

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment option for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) with high rates of complete resection. However, limited research exists on the efficacy of ESD for SEC in gastrectomized patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESD for SEC in gastrectomized patients. We included 318 patients of SEC treated at our institution between April 2005 and October 2021. To minimize bias between the gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized groups, we conducted a propensity-score matched analysis and compared the ESD outcomes for SEC of the two groups. Of the 318 patients included in the study, 48 and 270 patients were in the gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized groups, respectively. After 1:2 propensity-score matching, we matched 44 patients in the gastrectomized group to 88 patients in the non-gastrectomized group, and found no significant differences in the baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Regarding the ESD outcomes, there were no significant differences in the complete resection rate, procedure time, hospitalized period, and recurrence rates between the two groups. Multivariate analysis also cofirmed that the history of gastrectomy was not a risk factor of the difficult case of esophageal ESD. In conclusion, history of gastrectomy might not negatively affect the ESD outcomes of SECs.

Risk Factors for Fever After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Its Derived Technique

Background

Fever is one of the postoperative adverse events of endoscopic submucosal dissection and its derived technique, but the probability and risk factors of postoperative fever are still unclear. The aim of the current study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative fever after esophageal lesion removal.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 446 patients who underwent esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its derived technique between January 2014 and January 2020. Cases included in this study were divided into fever and non-fever groups.

Results

Postoperative fever developed in 135 patients (30.3%). The median (range) highest fever temperature was 38 (37.8–38.4)°C, the median (range) duration of fever was 1 (1–2) day, and 127 (94.1%) patients developed fever within 24 h after operation. Through logistic regression analysis, factors associated with postoperative fever were age (OR: 1.740, 95% CI: 1.005–3.013, p = 0.048), lesion size (OR: 2.007, 95% CI: 1.198–3.362, p = 0.008), operation time (OR: 3.007, 95% CI: 1.756–5.147, p < 0.001) and nasogastric tube placement (OR: 1.881, 95% CI: 1.165–3.037, p = 0.010), while prophylactic antibiotics (OR: 0.181, 95% CI: 0.082–0.401, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with fever.

Conclusions

Age ≥52 years old, lesion size ≥19 mm, operation time ≥37 min, and nasogastric tube placement are risk factors for postoperative fever after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its derived technique, prophylactic antibiotic use after operation may help reduce fever rate. Attention should be paid to such patients to minimize the risk of postoperative fever.