Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection: initial experience and reproducibility in a limited resource setting-with technique video

A Novel Fascial Flap Technique After Inguinal Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal complete lymph node dissection (CLND) for metastatic melanoma exposes the femoral vein and artery. To protect femoral vessels while preserving the sartorius muscle, we developed a novel sartorius and adductor fascial flap (SAFF) technique for coverage.

METHODS

The SAFF technique includes dissection of fascia off sartorius and/or adductor muscles, rotation over femoral vasculature, and suturing into place. Patients who underwent inguinal CLND with SAFF for melanoma at our institution were identified retrospectively from a prospectively-collected database. Patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations of palpable and non-palpable disease with wound complications.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2019, 51 patients underwent CLND with SAFF. Median age was 62 years, and 59% were female. Thirty-one (61%) patients were presented with palpable disease and 20 (39%) had non-palpable disease. Fifty-five percent (95% confidence interval CI: 40%-69%) experienced at least one wound complication: wound infection was most common (45%; 95% CI: 31%-60%), while bleeding was the least (2%; 95% CI: 0.05%-11%). Complications were similar, with and without palpable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFF procedure covers femoral vessels, minimizes bleeding, preserves the sartorius muscle, and uses standard surgical techniques easily adoptable by surgeons who perform inguinal CLND.

Challenging the Contraindications of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Report of 2 Cases

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic inguinal dissection is an emerging procedure utilizing minimally invasive technology to perform inguinal dissections aiming to avoid skin complications. Despite numerous reports there seems to be no consensus on inclusion and exclusion criteria, raising the question of when and when not to choose the minimally invasive technique. We compare the inclusion and exclusion criteria in published literature, and present our experience with 2 challenging cases; 1 with skin infiltration and the other with a previous lymphadenectomy scar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present 2 cases where this procedure was performed, despite limited nodal skin infiltration in the first case, and presence of a fresh scar of a previous biopsy and recent history of chemotherapy treatment in the second case.

RESULTS

Despite skin infiltration by inguinal nodes, endoscopic inguinal dissection was performed and the attached skin was excised and delivered with the lymph nodes through the incision in the first case. Presence of a fresh scar and history of chemotherapy did not affect the outcomes in the second case, albeit fibrosis and adhesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin infiltration, previous lymphadenectomy, and previous groin therapy might not represent absolute contraindications in selected cases and in the hands of experienced surgeons.