1
|
Lattimore CM, Meneveau MO, Desai R, Camacho TF, Squeo GC, Showalter SL. Are There Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy? J Surg Res 2024; 298:277-290. [PMID: 38636184 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite national guidelines against contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in low- to moderate-risk breast cancer, CPM use continues to rise. Breast reconstruction improves health-related quality of life and satisfaction among women undergoing mastectomy. Given the lack of data regarding factors associated with reconstruction after CPM and the known benefits of reconstruction, we sought to investigate whether disparities exist in receipt of reconstruction after CPM. METHODS The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent unilateral mastectomy with CPM. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent planned reconstruction at any timepoint and those who did not. A secondary analysis comparing types of reconstruction (tissue, implant, combined) was conducted. Patient, tumor, and demographic characteristics were analyzed using chi-square test and odds ratios were calculated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS The cohort included 1,73,249 women: 95,818 (55.3%) underwent reconstruction and 77,431 (45.7%) did not. Both the rate CPM and the proportion of women undergoing reconstruction after CPM increased between 2004 and 2017. Of the women who had reconstruction, 40,840 (51.7%) received implants, 29,807 (37.7%) had tissue, and 8352 (10.6%) had combined reconstruction. After adjusted analysis, factors associated with reconstruction were young age, Hispanic ethnicity, private insurance, and living in an area with the highest education and median income (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent reconstruction were less likely to have radiation (P < 0.01) and chemotherapy (P < 0.01), more likely to have stage I disease (P < 0.01), and to be treated at an integrated cancer center (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Reconstruction after CPM is disproportionately received by younger women, Hispanics, those with private insurance, and higher socioeconomic status and education. While the rate of reconstruction after CPM is increasing, there remain significant disparities. Conscious efforts must be made to eliminate these disparities, especially given the known benefits of reconstruction after mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Max O Meneveau
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Raj Desai
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - T Fabian Camacho
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Gabriella C Squeo
- Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cramer CL, Cunningham M, Zhang AM, Pambianchi HL, James AL, Lattimore CM, Cummins KC, Turkheimer LM, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM. Safety of postdischarge extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:115-120. [PMID: 38445932 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is high. Extended postdischarge prophylaxis in this patient population has been controversial. This study aimed to examine the safety of postdischarge extended VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE events after HPB surgery. METHODS Adult patients risk stratified as very high risk of VTE who underwent HPB operations between 2014 and 2020 at a quaternary care center were included. Patients were matched 1:2 extended VTE prophylaxis to the control group (patients who did not receive extended prophylaxis). Analyses compared the proportions of adverse bleeding events between groups. RESULTS A total of 307 patients were included: 103 in the extended prophylaxis group and 204 in the matched control group. Demographics were similar between groups. More patients in the extended VTE prophylaxis group had a history of VTE (9% vs 3%; P = .045). There was no difference in bleeding events between the extended VTE prophylaxis and the control group (6% vs 2%; P = .091). Of the 6 patients with bleeding events in the VTE prophylaxis group, 5 had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and 1 had hemarthrosis. Of the 4 patients with bleeding events in the control group, 1 had intra-abdominal bleeding, 2 had GI bleeding, and 1 had intra-abdominal and GI bleeding. CONCLUSION Patients discharged with extended VTE prophylaxis after HPB surgery did not experience more adverse bleeding events compared with a matched control group. Routine postdischarge extended VTE prophylaxis is safe in patients at high risk of postoperative VTE after HPB surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Cramer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Michaela Cunningham
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Ashley M Zhang
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Hannah L Pambianchi
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Amber L James
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Courtney M Lattimore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Kaelyn C Cummins
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Lena M Turkheimer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Florence E Turrentine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Victor M Zaydfudim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lattimore CM, Kane WJ, Subbarao S, Venitti C, Cramer CL, Turkheimer LM, Bauer TW, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM. Long-term surveillance of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms without worrisome or high-risk features. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1087-1094. [PMID: 37530526 PMCID: PMC10592219 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term data evaluating clinical outcomes in patients with branch-duct Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) without high-risk stigmata (HRS) or worrisome features (WF) remain limited. METHODS This observational cohort study included all patients diagnosed with BD-IPMN without HRS or WF between 2003 and 2019 who were enrolled in a prospective surveillance program. Time-to-progression analysis was performed using a cumulative incidence function plot and survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS The median follow-up time for the 267 patient cohort was 44.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 24.1-72.2). Radiographic cyst growth was observed in 123 (46.1%) patients; 65 (24.3%) patients progressed to WF/HRS. Twenty-six (9.7%) patients were selected for resection during surveillance: 21 (80.8%) WF, 4 (15.4%) HRS; 1 (3.9%) transformed to mixed-duct. Of all the patients who underwent resection, 5 (19.2%) had adenocarcinoma, and 1 (3.8%) had carcinoma-in-situ. The probability of any radiographic progression was 21.3% (5-year) and 51.3% (10-year). For the entire cohort, there was 1.1% mortality secondary to pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 8.2% all-cause mortality. The 5-year overall survival rate was 91.5%, and at 10 years, 81.5%. CONCLUSION Approximately one in four patients with nonworrisome BD-IPMN have progression to WF/HRS stigmata during surveillance. However, the risk of malignant transformation remains low. Surveillance strategy remains prudent in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M. Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| | - William J. Kane
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| | | | | | - Christopher L. Cramer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| | - Lena M. Turkheimer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| | | | - Florence E. Turrentine
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| | - Victor M. Zaydfudim
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Squeo GC, Meneveau MO, Varhegyi NE, Lattimore CM, Janowski E, Showalter TN, Showalter SL. Factors Associated With Cosmetic Outcomes After Treatment With a Novel Form of Breast Intraoperative Radiation Therapy. J Surg Res 2023; 283:514-522. [PMID: 36436288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) incorporates computed tomography-guided treatment planning and high dose rate brachytherapy to deliver a single dose of highly conformal radiational therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with poor cosmetic outcomes after treatment with PB-IORT. METHODS The study included all consecutive participants enrolled in an ongoing phase II clinical trial that had completed a minimum of 12 mo of follow-up. A poor cosmetic outcome was defined as scoring "fair" or "poor" on the Harvard Cosmesis evaluation, or "some" or "very much" on any of the three general cosmesis categories. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing R. RESULTS The final cohort included 201 participants, of which 181 (90%) had an overall good/excellent cosmetic outcome. Group 1 consisted of 162 (81%) participants who reported only excellent/good cosmetic outcomes. Group 2 consisted of 39 (19%) participants who reported some aspect of a poor cosmetic outcome. On multivariable analysis, participants with ductal carcinoma in situ were significantly more likely to experience a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.82, P = 0.04), and those who received subsequent whole breast irradiation were also more likely to have a poor cosmetic outcome (odds ratio 10.20, 95% confidence interval CI 1.04-99.95, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Patients with need for further radiation after PB-IORT are at increased risk for a poor cosmetic outcome. Larger balloon volume and distance between the skin do not have deleterious effects on cosmetic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella C Squeo
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Max O Meneveau
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nikole E Varhegyi
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Courtney M Lattimore
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Einsley Janowski
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marsh KM, Lattimore CM, Cramer CL, Slingluff CL, Dengel LT. Subcostal lymph nodes: An unusual sentinel lymph node basin in cutaneous melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1272-1278. [PMID: 35870116 PMCID: PMC9707633 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lymphatic drainage from subcostal nodes, along the costal groove, have not previously been characterized as sites for melanoma drainage and metastasis. This study reports a series of patients with subcostal nodes draining primary melanomas, with characterization of the sites of primary melanomas that drain to these nodes. METHODS Patients who presented to our institution between 2005 and 2020 with documented cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy of a subcostal node (sentinel = S), or metastases to subcostal nodes later in clinical management (recurrent = R) were included. Patient demographics, melanoma pathology, nodal features, imaging information, surgical approaches, and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS Six patients had subcostal sentinel nodes (SNs). Primary sites included the posterior trunk and lateral chest wall. Subcostal nodes were found under ribs 10-12. Subcostal SNs had at least one dimension measuring 3 mm or less. There were no surgical complications related to removing the subcostal SN. CONCLUSIONS Melanoma can metastasize to subcostal lymph nodes and be found at the time of SN biopsy or identified at recurrence. These small nodes are fed by lymphatic channels that run in the neurovascular bundle under the ribs. When lymphatic mapping identifies a subcostal SN, it should be excised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lynn T. Dengel
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lattimore CM, Meneveau MO, Marsh KM, Shada AL, Slingluff CL, Dengel LT. A Novel Fascial Flap Technique After Inguinal Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma. J Surg Res 2022; 278:356-363. [PMID: 35671681 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inguinal complete lymph node dissection (CLND) for metastatic melanoma exposes the femoral vein and artery. To protect femoral vessels while preserving the sartorius muscle, we developed a novel sartorius and adductor fascial flap (SAFF) technique for coverage. METHODS The SAFF technique includes dissection of fascia off sartorius and/or adductor muscles, rotation over femoral vasculature, and suturing into place. Patients who underwent inguinal CLND with SAFF for melanoma at our institution were identified retrospectively from a prospectively-collected database. Patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations of palpable and non-palpable disease with wound complications. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, 51 patients underwent CLND with SAFF. Median age was 62 years, and 59% were female. Thirty-one (61%) patients were presented with palpable disease and 20 (39%) had non-palpable disease. Fifty-five percent (95% confidence interval CI: 40%-69%) experienced at least one wound complication: wound infection was most common (45%; 95% CI: 31%-60%), while bleeding was the least (2%; 95% CI: 0.05%-11%). Complications were similar, with and without palpable disease. CONCLUSIONS The SAFF procedure covers femoral vessels, minimizes bleeding, preserves the sartorius muscle, and uses standard surgical techniques easily adoptable by surgeons who perform inguinal CLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Max O Meneveau
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Katherine M Marsh
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Amber L Shada
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Craig L Slingluff
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Lynn T Dengel
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cramer CL, Kane WJ, Lattimore CM, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM. Evaluating the Impact of Preoperative Geriatric-Specific Variables and Modified Frailty Index on Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Pancreatic Surgery. World J Surg 2022; 46:2797-2805. [PMID: 36076089 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06710-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pursuing pancreatic resection in elderly patients is often complex and limited by concern for functional status and postoperative risk. This study examines the associations between two different preoperative functional status metrics with postoperative outcomes in the geriatric population. METHODS Patients who participated in the ACS NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Research File pilot program (2014-2018) undergoing elective pancreatic operations were included. Two clinically meaningful functional status scores were calculated: the presence of one or more geriatric-specific variable (GSV) and a 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for ACS NSQIP-estimated risk was performed to evaluate associations between preoperative GSV, mFI-5 and 30-day outcome measures. RESULTS A total of 1266 patients were included: 808 (64%) age 65-74, 302 (24%) age 75-80, and 156 (12%) age ≥ 81; 843 (67%) patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Operations were performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 712 (56%) patients. Older patients had greater likelihood of postoperative morbidity (35% vs 31% vs 47%, by age group, p = 0.004) and discharge to a facility (12% vs 23% vs 48%, by age group, p < 0.001). Adjusting for ACS NSQIP predicted risk, patients with a preoperative GSV were more likely to require reoperation and discharge to a facility (OR 1.81 [95% CI 1.03-3.16] and 3.95 [95% CI 2.91-5.38], respectively). The mFI-5 was not associated with postoperative outcomes (all p ≥ 0.18). CONCLUSION The presence of a preoperative GSV is associated with reoperation and discharge to a skilled facility following elective pancreatic resection. Geriatric-specific variables should be considered in joint preoperative decision making to optimize care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Cramer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA.,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - William J Kane
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA.,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Courtney M Lattimore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA.,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Florence E Turrentine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA.,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Victor M Zaydfudim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709, USA. .,Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Squeo GC, Lattimore CM, Simone NL, Suralik G, Dutta SW, Schad MD, Su L, Libby B, Janowski EM, Showalter SL, Lobo JM, Showalter TN. A comparative study using time-driven activity-based costing in single-fraction breast high-dose rate brachytherapy: An integrated brachytherapy suite vs. decentralized workflow. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:334-340. [PMID: 35125328 PMCID: PMC9149052 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Precision breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT) is a novel approach to adjuvant radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer performed as part of a phase II clinical trial at two institutions. One institution performs the entire procedure in an integrated brachytherapy suite which contains a CT-on-rails imaging unit and full anesthesia capabilities. At the other, breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy take place in two separate locations. Here, we utilize time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to compare these two models for the delivery of PB-IORT. METHODS Process maps were created to describe each step required to deliver PB-IORT at each institution, including personnel, equipment, and supplies. Time investment was estimated for each step. The capacity cost rate was determined for each resource, and total costs of care were then calculated by multiplying the capacity cost rates by the time estimate for the process step and adding any additional product costs. RESULTS PB-IORT costs less to deliver at a distributed facility, as is more commonly available, than an integrated brachytherapy suite ($3,262.22 vs. $3,996.01). The largest source of costs in both settings ($2,400) was consumable supplies, including the brachytherapy balloon applicator. The difference in costs for the two facility types was driven by personnel costs ($1,263.41 vs. $764.89). In the integrated facility, increased time required by radiation oncology nursing and the anesthesia attending translated to the greatest increases in cost. Equipment costs were also slightly higher in the integrated suite setting ($332.60 vs. $97.33). CONCLUSIONS The overall cost of care is higher when utilizing an integrated brachytherapy suite to deliver PB-IORT. This was primarily driven by additional personnel costs from nursing and anesthesia, although the greatest cost of delivery in both settings was the disposable brachytherapy applicator. These differences in cost must be balanced against the potential impact on patient experience with these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella C Squeo
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Courtney M Lattimore
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Nicole L Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Greg Suralik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Sunil W Dutta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Michael D Schad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Lucy Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Bruce Libby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Einsley-Marie Janowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Jennifer M Lobo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rastogi R, Lattimore CM, Mehaffey JH, Turrentine FE, Maitland HS, Zaydfudim VM. Electronic Health Record Risk-Stratification Tool Reduces Venous Thromboembolism Events in Surgical Patients. Surg Open Sci 2022; 9:34-40. [PMID: 35620709 PMCID: PMC9127397 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism is a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery. To ensure that patients receive appropriate venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis, a nonmandatory risk-stratification tool based on patient clinical condition was implemented through the electronic health record to stratify patient risk and recommend chemoprophylaxis. We hypothesized that implementing this tool would reduce postoperative venous thromboembolism events in general surgery as well as across all surgical services. Methods All adult patients undergoing inpatient surgical operations (January 2012–December 2019) at a single quaternary care center and Level 1 trauma center were abstracted from institutional electronic health record database and stratified into patients admitted before and after venous thromboembolism risk-stratification tool implementation. Bivariable analyses compared venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis prescription and venous thromboembolism events with implementation and screening among all surgical patients as well as in general surgery patient subset. Results A total of 64,377 adults underwent operations: 27,819 preimplementation and 36,558 postimplementation. A significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events occurred from pre- to post-tool implementation for all cases (0.77% vs 0.47%, P < .001). General surgery patients (n = 15,723) had a significant increase in chemoprophylaxis prescription (81.9% vs 86.0%, P < .001) and a significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events (1.41% vs 0.59%, P < .001). After tool implementation, use of extended postdischarge chemoprophylaxis was greater among general surgery patient subset than the entire patient cohort (46.7% vs 29.6%, P < .001). Conclusion The integration of a nonmandatory electronic health record risk-stratification tool was associated with a significant reduction in venous thromboembolism events. Extended chemoprophylaxis was prescribed in nearly half of general surgery patients at very high risk for postdischarge events. Implementing an electronic VTE risk-stratification tool reduced surgical VTE events. Even as a nonmandatory tool, risk stratification led to overall fewer VTE events. Postoperative VTE events were reduced by 39% after the tool was integrated in EHR. With the tool, general surgery had 58% less VTE events and improved prophylaxis use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Rastogi
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Courtney M. Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - J. Hunter Mehaffey
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Florence E. Turrentine
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Hillary S. Maitland
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Victor M. Zaydfudim
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908
- Corresponding author at: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, PO Box 800709, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0709. Tel.: + 1-434-924-2839; fax: + 1 434-982-4778. @vz_surgery
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lattimore CM, Meneveau MO, Petroni GR, Varhegyi NE, Squeo GC, Showalter TN, Showalter SL. Effects of a novel form of intraoperative radiation therapy on quality of life among patients with early-stage breast cancer. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:325-333. [PMID: 35120862 PMCID: PMC9149037 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate patient-perceived quality of life (QOL) among patients treated with a novel form of breast intraoperative radiation therapy (PB-IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated with PB-IORT as part of a phase II clinical trial from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Patients were given the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) encompassing global health, functionality, and symptomatology at baseline, 1-month, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months after PB-IORT. Scores were on a 100-point scale with change greater than 10 considered clinically significant. Scores at interval follow-up were compared to baseline using repeated measure modeling with an unstructured covariance matrix. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 303 patients, a majority of which were White (84.2%) with a median age of 64 years (IQR: 52, 76). One month after PB-IORT, a decline from baseline in physical (-2.5, 95% CI: -4.4 - -0.55, p = 0.01), role (-7.6, 95% CI: -11.7 - -3.5, p < 0.001), and social functioning (-3.0, 95% CI: -5.5 - -0.42, p = 0.02) were observed, which correlated with increased fatigue (8.4, 95% CI: 5.5-11.3, p < 0.001). At 6 months, nearly all QOL measures returned to baseline or improved. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences from baseline in overall global health. All functional and symptom scale differences were less than 10, indicating minimal clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS PB-IORT has minimal negative impact on QOL, further supporting this patient-centered treatment approach for early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
| | - Max O Meneveau
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Gina R Petroni
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Nikole E Varhegyi
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Gabriella C Squeo
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, VA 22908
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lattimore CM, Kane WJ, Fleming MA, Martin AN, Mehaffey JH, Smolkin ME, Ratcliffe SJ, Zaydfudim VM, Showalter SL, Hedrick TL. Disparities in telemedicine utilization among surgical patients during COVID-19. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258452. [PMID: 34624059 PMCID: PMC8500431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Telemedicine has been rapidly adopted in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited work surrounding demographic and socioeconomic disparities that may exist in telemedicine utilization. This study aimed to examine demographic and socioeconomic differences in surgical patient telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Department of Surgery outpatients seen from July 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020 were stratified into three visit groups: pre-COVID-19 in-person, COVID-19 in-person, or COVID-19 telemedicine. Generalized linear models were used to examine associations of sex, race/ethnicity, Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, MyChart activation, and insurance status with telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 14,792 patients (median age 60, female [57.0%], non-Hispanic White [76.4%]) contributed to 21,980 visits. Compared to visits before the pandemic, telemedicine visits during COVID-19 were more likely to be with patients from the least socioeconomically distressed communities (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08,1.58; P = 0.005), with an activated MyChart (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17–1.64; P < .001), and with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.84–2.94; P < .001). Adjusted comparison of telemedicine visits to in person visits during COVID-19 revealed telemedicine users were more likely to be female (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.10–1.73; P = 0.005) and pay with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.85–4.16; P < .001). Conclusions During the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was more likely utilized by female patients and those without government or commercial insurance compared to patients who used in-person visits. Interventions using telemedicine to improve health care access might consider such differences in utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M. Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - William J. Kane
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Mark A. Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Allison N. Martin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - J. Hunter Mehaffey
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Mark E. Smolkin
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Sarah J. Ratcliffe
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Victor M. Zaydfudim
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Shayna L. Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Traci L. Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fleming MA, Scott EJ, Bradford PS, Lattimore CM, Omesiete WI, Williams CA, Williams MD, Martin AN. The Risk and Reward of Speaking Out for Racial Equity in Surgical Training. J Surg Educ 2021; 78:1387-1392. [PMID: 33531275 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In order to maintain productivity and career advancement, Black and Brown individuals often find themselves downplaying persistent elements of bias and racism experienced in predominantly white fields. These elements are commonly reinforced by institutional and departmental policies that hinder the creation of an equitable and inclusive environment for all. In this manuscript, we outline specific challenges faced by Black and Brown trainees and faculty that are perpetuated by such policies. The challenges are followed by specific recommendations for change as they may apply to faculty, staff and trainees. The outlined recommendations or "action items" may be enacted by any residency program or department based on perceived timeliness and should serve as a foundation for change-one that is intently created through a lens of anti-racism. The risk of speaking up for racial equity is outweighed by the potential rewards of building an environment that is diverse, inclusive and better for everyone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Erik J Scott
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Perry S Bradford
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Wilson I Omesiete
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Carlin A Williams
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michael D Williams
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Allison N Martin
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lattimore CM, Kane WJ, Turrentine FE, Zaydfudim VM. The impact of obesity and severe obesity on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2021; 170:1538-1545. [PMID: 34059346 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of obesity on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy remains insufficiently studied. METHODS All pancreatoduodenectomy patients were abstracted from the 2014 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets and were stratified into the following 3 body mass index categories: non-obese (body mass index 18.5-29.9), class 1/2 obesity (body mass index 30-39.9), and class 3 severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 40). Analyses tested associations between patient factors and four 30-day postoperative outcomes: mortality, composite morbidity, delayed gastric emptying, and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Multivariable logistic regression models tested independent associations between patient factors and these 4 outcome measures. RESULTS A total of 16,823 patients were included in the study: 12,234 (72.7%) non-obese, 4,030 (24%) obese, and 559 (3.3%) with severe obesity. Bivariable analyses demonstrated significant associations between obesity, severe obesity, and greater proportions of numerous preoperative comorbidities as well as a greater likelihood of postoperative complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, composite morbidity, and mortality (all P ≤ .001). After adjusting for significant covariates, obesity was independently associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.67, P < .001), delayed gastric emptying (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.28, P = .004), composite morbidity (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.38, P < .001), and mortality (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-2.36, P < .001). CONCLUSION Obesity and severe obesity are significantly associated with worse short-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Preoperative considerations, such as weight management strategies during individualized treatment planning, could improve outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William J Kane
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Florence E Turrentine
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Victor M Zaydfudim
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miller MM, Meneveau MO, Rochman CM, Schroen AT, Lattimore CM, Gaspard PA, Cubbage RS, Showalter SL. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening volumes and patient screening behaviors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 189:237-246. [PMID: 34032985 PMCID: PMC8145189 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06252-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In order to facilitate targeted outreach, we sought to identify patient populations with a lower likelihood of returning for breast cancer screening after COVID-19-related imaging center closures. Methods Weekly total screening mammograms performed throughout 2019 (baseline year) and 2020 (COVID-19-impacted year) were compared. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, race, ethnicity, breast density, breast cancer history, insurance status, imaging facility type used, and need for interpreter, were compared between patients imaged from March 16 to October 31 in 2019 (baseline cohort) and 2020 (COVID-19-impacted cohort). Census data and an online map service were used to impute socioeconomic variables and calculate travel times for each patient. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of returning for screening after COVID-19-related closures. Results The year-over-year cumulative difference in screening mammogram volumes peaked in week 21, with 2962 fewer exams in the COVID-19-impacted year. By week 47, this deficit had reduced by 49.4% to 1498. A lower likelihood of returning for screening after COVID-19-related closures was independently associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR) 0.78, p < 0.001), residence in a higher poverty area (OR 0.991, p = 0.014), lack of health insurance (OR 0.65, p = 0.007), need for an interpreter (OR 0.68, p = 0.029), longer travel time (OR 0.998, p < 0.001), and utilization of mobile mammography services (OR 0.27, p < 0.001). Conclusion Several patient factors are associated with a lower likelihood of returning for screening mammography after COVID-19-related closures. Knowledge of these factors can guide targeted outreach to vulnerable patients to facilitate breast cancer screening. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06252-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Miller
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| | - Max O Meneveau
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Carrie M Rochman
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
| | - Anneke T Schroen
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Courtney M Lattimore
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Patricia A Gaspard
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
| | - Richard S Cubbage
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|