Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery

Determination of causes of post-operative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery based on intra-operative planimetry

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is one of the most common indications for re-operative anti-reflux surgery and a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, the factors affecting its development are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation between pre-operative manometric and the intra-operative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements and development of post-operative dysphagia.

METHODS

A review of patients who underwent index robotic ARS in our institution. Patients who underwent pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP™ were included in our study. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3-month after surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (26.9%) reported post-operative dysphagia, and 34 (16.6%) reported new or worsening dysphagia. On pre-operative manometry, patients with post-operative dysphagia had a lower distal contractile integral [868.7 (IQR 402.2-1447) mmHg s cm vs 1207 (IQR 612.1-2111) mmHg s cm, p = 0.006) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure [14.7 IQR (8.9-23.6) mmHg vs 20.7 IQR (10.2-32.6) mmHg, p = 0.01] compared to those without post-operative dysphagia. They were also found to have higher pre-operative cross-sectional surface area (CSA) [83 IQR (44.5-112) mm2 vs 66 IQR (42-93) mm2, p = 0.02], and distensibility index (DI) [4.2 IQR (2.2-5.5) mm2/mmHg vs 2.9 IQR (1.6-4.6) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.003] compared to patients without post-operative dysphagia. Additionally, the decrease in CSA [- 34 (- 18.5, - 74.5) mm2 vs - 26.5 (- 10.5, - 53.7) mm2, p = 0.03] and DI [- 2.3 (- 1.2, - 3.7) mm2/mmHg vs - 1.6 (- 0.7, - 3.3) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.03] measurements were greater in patients with post-operative dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Patients who developed dysphagia post-operatively had poorer pre-operative motility and a greater change in LES characteristics intra-operatively. This finding suggests the utility of pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP in identifying patients at risk of developing dysphagia post-operatively.

Exploring the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with the new RefluxStop™ device: a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Anti-reflux surgery aims to restore the anti-reflux barrier and reduce the retrograde flow of stomach contents. However, traditional surgical techniques generally involve some degree of encircling of the oesophagus, which can result in adverse effects such as dysphagia and the inability to belch or vomit. Based on the first published results, a novel surgical technique - with the RefluxStop™ device - appears promising for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with minimal postoperative dysphagia. This study describes the initial clinical experience with this procedure in a cohort of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease to evaluate its feasibility and safety in clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined the first 40 patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with the RefluxStop™ device at a private hospital in Switzerland. The procedure involves implanting a nonactive device on the outside of the gastric fundus to stabilise a narrow oesophagogastric plication. Feasibility was assessed based on the proportion of patients in whom the device could be successfully implanted, with a discussion of the operative details. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, adverse effects, and changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL questionnaire) are also reported.

RESULTS

Between May 2020 and April 2022, 40 patients underwent elective surgery for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and RefluxStop™ device implantation. All patients had typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, such as heartburn and regurgitation; 20 (50%) had preoperative dysphagia. Laparoscopic surgery was feasible in all patients except one who required laparotomy due to adhesions and associated bleeding when accessing the abdomen. The median operating time was 57.5 minutes (interquartile range = 51.75-64.25 minutes) with no device-related intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients were imaged one day and three months postoperative, confirming the correct placement of the device. Reflux symptoms (heartburn and acid regurgitation) were significantly improved in all patients at three months (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results support the feasibility and safety of introducing this novel laparoscopic anti-reflux surgical treatment option in clinical practice.

Dysphagia as a Missing Link Between Post-surgical- and Opioid-Related Pneumonia

PURPOSE

Postoperative pneumonia remains a common complication of surgery, despite increased attention. The purpose of our study was to determine the effects of routine surgery and post-surgical opioid administration on airway protection risk.

METHODS

Eight healthy adult cats were evaluated to determine changes in airway protection status and for evidence of dysphagia in two experiments. (1) In four female cats, airway protection status was tracked following routine abdominal surgery (spay surgery) plus low-dose opioid administration (buprenorphine 0.015 mg/kg, IM, q8-12 h; n = 5). (2) Using a cross-over design, four naive cats (2 male, 2 female) were treated with moderate-dose (0.02 mg/kg) or high-dose (0.04 mg/kg) buprenorphine (IM, q8-12 h; n = 5).

RESULTS

Airway protection was significantly affected in both experiments, but the most severe deficits occurred post-surgically as 75% of the animals exhibited silent aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Oropharyngeal swallow is impaired by the partial mu-opioid receptor agonist buprenorphine, most remarkably in the postoperative setting. These findings have implications for the prevention and management of aspiration pneumonia in vulnerable populations.

Quantifying physiologic parameters of the gastroesophageal junction during robotic sleeve gastrectomy and identifying predictors of post-sleeve gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy is among the most commonly-performed procedures for morbid obesity. However, patients occasionally develop post-sleeve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Identifying patients most at risk for this complication remains difficult. We aimed to correlate intra-operative physiologic measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) during robotic sleeve gastrectomy in an attempt to identify predictors of post-sleeve GERD symptoms.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database identified 28 patients in whom robotic sleeve gastrectomy was performed utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology between January and September 2021. Intraoperative LES measurements at the GEJ including cross-sectional area (CSA), distensibility index (DI), intra-balloon pressure, and high-pressure zone (HPZ length) were correlated with post-operative GERD.

RESULTS

GEJ CSA, pressure, and DI increased over the course of the surgery (CSA pre-op: 31 (IQR 19.3-39.5) mm² vs. post-op: 67 (IQR 40.8-95.8) mm², p < 0.001; pressure: 25.8 (IQR 20.2-33.1) mmHg vs. 31.5 (IQR 28.9-37.0) mmHg, p = 0.007; DI 1.1 (IQR 0.8-1.8) mm²/mmHg vs. 2.0 (IQR 1.2-3.0) mm²/mmHg, p =  < 0.001), whereas HPZ length decreased (2.5 (IQR 2.5-3) cm vs. 2.0 (IQR 1.3-2.5) cm, p = 0.022). Twenty-three patients (82.1%) completed a post-operative GERD questionnaire. Fifteen (65.2%) had no GERD symptoms before or after surgery; 5 (21.7%) reported new post-sleeve GERD symptoms; 3 (13.0%) reported exacerbation of pre-existing GERD symptoms. Patients with new or worsening GERD symptoms had higher post-sleeve DIs (3.2 (IQR 1.9-4.5) mm²/mmHg vs. 1.5 (IQR 1.2-2.4) mm²/mmHg, p = 0.024) and lower post-sleeve LES pressures (29.9 (IQR 26.3-32.9) mmHg vs. 35.2 (IQR 31.0-38.0) mmHg, p = 0.023) than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in GEJ CSA, pressure, and DI, and a decrease in GEJ length can be expected during robotic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients with new or worsening post-sleeve GERD symptoms have higher post-sleeve DI and lower post-sleeve LES pressure than their asymptomatic counterparts.

Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: an assessment of etiology, clinical presentation, and management

BACKGROUND

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) erosion, disruption or displacement clearly requires device removal. However, up to 5.5% of patients without anatomical failure require removal for dysphagia or recurrent GERD symptoms. Studies characterizing these patients or their management are limited. We aimed to characterize these patients, compare their outcomes, and determine the necessity for further reflux surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 777 patients who underwent MSA at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Patients who underwent device removal for persistent dysphagia or recurrent GERD symptoms were included. Demographic, clinical, objective testing, and quality of life data obtained preoperatively, after implantation and following removal were compared between removal for dysphagia and GERD groups. Sub-analyses were performed comparing outcomes with and without an anti-reflux surgery (ARS) at the time of removal.

RESULTS

A total of 40 (5.1%) patients underwent device removal, 31 (77.5%) for dysphagia and 9 (22.5%) for GERD. After implantation, dysphagia patients had less heartburn (12.9-vs-77.7%, p = 0.0005) less regurgitation (16.1-vs-55.5%, p = 0.0286), and more pH-normalization (91.7-vs-33.3%, p = 0.0158). Removal without ARS was performed in 5 (55.6%) GERD and 22 (71.0%) dysphagia patients. Removal for dysphagia patients had more complete symptom resolution (63.6-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0159), freedom from PPIs (81.8-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0016) and pH-normalization (77.8-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0455). Patients who underwent removal for dysphagia had comparable symptom resolution (p = 0.6770, freedom from PPI (p = 0.3841) and pH-normalization (p = 0.2534) with or without ARS. Those who refused ARS with removal for GERD had more heartburn (100.0%-vs-25.0%, p = 0.0476), regurgitation (80.0%-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0476) and PPI use (75.0%-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0476).

CONCLUSIONS

MSA removal outcomes are dependent on the indication for removal. Removal for dysphagia yields excellent outcomes regardless of anti-reflux surgery. Patients with persistent GERD had worse outcomes on all measures without ARS. We propose a tailored approach to MSA removal-based indication for removal.

Comparative Outcomes of Anti-Reflux Surgery in Obese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease1

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the preferred operation for obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, some patients are hesitant to undergo bypass. Obese patients have a multifactorial predisposition to GERD, including lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction and aberrant pressure gradients across their diaphragmatic crura. Among non-obese patients, anti-reflux surgery (ARS) with hiatal hernia (HH) repair and LES augmentation has shown excellent long-term results. We aimed to determine whether patient satisfaction and GERD recurrence differed between obese and non-obese patients who underwent ARS.

METHODS

Review of patients who underwent ARS between January 2012 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and postoperative characteristics were compared across three BMI groups: BMI < 30 kg/m², 30 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m², and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m².

RESULTS

Four-hundred thirteen patients were identified, of which 294 (71.1%) had BMI < 30 kg/m², 87 (21.1%) were 30 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m², and 32 (7.7%) had a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m². Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² had higher preoperative manometric and EndoFLIP™ intra-balloon pressure at the LES than those with lower BMIs. This value was increased to a similar level throughout ARS across the three cohorts. Post-operative GERD-specific satisfaction was similar across the three cohorts, as were rates of postoperative reflux and hiatal hernia recurrence on barium swallow; rates of reoperation were low.

CONCLUSIONS

ARS with HH repair and LES augmentation may be appropriate for select patients across a range of BMIs, including those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² who are hesitant to undergo RYGB.