1
|
Kamara M, Baur K, Langmeyer J, Huebner M, Ramm C, Cleary RK. Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9. [PMID: 38862825 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions. METHODS Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions. RESULTS A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maseray Kamara
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Katherine Baur
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessie Langmeyer
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Marianne Huebner
- Center for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Carole Ramm
- Department of Academic Research, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu CY, Lai CJ, Xiao FR, Yang JT, Yang SH, Lai DM, Tsuang FY. Validity of the I‑FEED classification in assessing postoperative gastrointestinal impairment in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery with general anesthesia: a prospective observational study. Perioper Med (Lond) 2024; 13:50. [PMID: 38831440 PMCID: PMC11145765 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00409-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The I-FEED classification, scored 0-8, was reported to accurately describe the clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal impairment after colorectal surgery. Therefore, it is interesting to determine whether the I-FEED scoring system is also applicable to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. METHODS Adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were enrolled, and the I-FEED score was measured for 4 days after surgery. The I-FEED scoring system incorporates five elements: intake (score: 0, 1, 3), feeling nauseated (score: 0, 1, 3), emesis (score: 0, 1, 3), results of physical exam (score: 0, 1, 3), and duration of symptoms (score: 0, 1, 2). Daily I-FEED scores were summed, and the highest overall score is used to categorize patients into one of three categories: normal (0-2 points), postoperative gastrointestinal intolerance (POGI; 3-5 points), and postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD; 6 + points). The construct validity hypothesis testing determines whether the I-FEED category is consistent with objective clinical findings relevant to gastrointestinal impairment, namely, the longer length of hospital stay (LOS), higher inhospital medical cost, more postoperative gastrointestinal medical treatment, and more postoperative non-gastrointestinal complications. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were enrolled, and 25.0% of patients were categorized as normal, 49.4% POGI, and 25.6% POGD. Patients with higher I-FEED scores agreed with the four validity hypotheses. Patients with POGD had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (1 day longer median stay; p = 0.049) and more inhospital medical costs (approximately 500 Taiwanese dollars; p = 0.037), and more patients with POGD required rectal laxatives (10.3% vs. 32.5% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.026). In addition, more patients with POGD had non-gastrointestinal complications (5.1% vs. 11.7% vs. 30.0%; p = 0.034). CONCLUSION This study contributes preliminary validity evidence for the I-FEED score as a measure for postoperative gastrointestinal impairment after elective lumbar spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Yu Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Jun Lai
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Ren Xiao
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Ting Yang
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Shih-Hung Yang
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan
| | - Dar-Ming Lai
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan
| | - Fon-Yih Tsuang
- Spine Tumor Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Faucheron J, Alao O, Trilling B. What is true ambulatory colectomy? Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:47. [PMID: 38613641 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02921-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- J Faucheron
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000, Grenoble, France.
| | - O Alao
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - B Trilling
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38000, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vu MM, Franko JJ, Buzadzhi A, Prey B, Rusev M, Lavery M, Rashidi L. Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:163-170. [PMID: 38363851 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies. METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions. RESULTS Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP. CONCLUSION Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Paradis T, Robitaille S, Wang A, Gervais C, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein BL, Fiore JF, Feldman LS, Lee L. Predictive Factors for Successful Same-Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Colectomy and Stoma Reversal. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:558-565. [PMID: 38127647 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery is a safe, effective practice in specific patients that can enhance the efficiency of enhanced recovery pathways. OBJECTIVE To identify predictive factors associated with success or failure of same-day discharge. DESIGN Prospective cohort study from January 2020 to March 2023. SETTINGS Tertiary colorectal center. PATIENTS Adult patients eligible for same-day discharge with remote postdischarge follow-up included those with minimal comorbidities, residing near the hospital, having sufficient home support, and owning a mobile device. INTERVENTIONS Patients were discharged on the day of surgery upon meeting specific criteria, including adequate pain control, tolerance of oral intake, independent mobility, urination, and the absence of complications. Successful same-day discharge was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without unplanned visits in the first 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Factors associated with successful or failed same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. RESULTS A total of 175 patients (85.3%) were discharged on the day of surgery, with 14 patients (8%) having an unplanned visit within 72 hours. Overall, 161 patients (78.5%) were categorized as same-day discharge success and 44 patients (21.5%) as same-day discharge failure. The same-day discharge failure group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.7 vs 2.8, p = 0.03). Mean length of stay (0.8 vs 3.0, p = 0.00), 30-day complications (10% vs 48%, p = 0.00), and readmissions (8% vs 27%, p = 0.00) were higher in the same-day discharge failure group. Regression analysis showed that failed same-day discharge was associated with higher comorbidities (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95) and prolonged postanesthesia care unit time (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Individuals who received a regional nerve block (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-14) and those who did not consume postoperative opioids (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1-21) were more likely to have successful same-day discharge. LIMITATIONS Single-center study. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that comorbidities and prolonged postanesthesia care unit stays were associated with same-day discharge failure, whereas regional nerve blocks and minimal postoperative opioids were related to success. These factors may inform future research aiming to enhance colorectal surgery recovery protocols. See Video Abstract . FACTORES PREDICTIVOS PARA UN ALTA EXITOSA EL MISMO DA DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y REVERSIN DEL ESTOMA ANTECEDENTES:El alta el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva es una práctica segura y eficaz en pacientes específicos que puede mejorar la eficiencia de las vías de recuperación mejoradas.OBJETIVO:Identificar factores predictivos asociados con el éxito o fracaso del alta el mismo día.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo del 01/2020 al 03/2023.AJUSTES:Centro colorrectal terciario.PACIENTES:Los pacientes adultos elegibles para el alta el mismo día con seguimiento remoto posterior al alta incluyeron aquellos con comorbilidades mínimas, que residían cerca del hospital, tenían suficiente apoyo en el hogar y poseían un dispositivo móvil.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía al cumplir con criterios específicos, incluido un control adecuado del dolor, tolerancia a la ingesta oral, movilidad independiente, micción y ausencia de complicaciones. El alta exitosa el mismo día se definió como el alta el día de la cirugía sin visitas no planificadas en las primeras 72 horas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Factores asociados con el alta exitosa o fallida el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva.RESULTADOS:Un total de 175 (85,3%) pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía y 14 (8%) pacientes tuvieron una visita no planificada dentro de las 72 horas. En total, 161 (78,5%) pacientes se clasificaron como éxito del alta el mismo día y 44 (21,5%) pacientes como fracaso del alta el mismo día. El grupo de fracaso del alta el mismo día tuvo un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más alto (3,7, 2,8, p = 0,03). La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria (0,8, 3,0, p = 0,00), las complicaciones a los 30 días (10%, 48%, p = 0,00) y los reingresos (8%, 27%, p = 0,00) fueron mayores en el mismo día grupo de fallo de descarga. El análisis de regresión mostró que el alta fallida el mismo día se asoció con mayores comorbilidades (OR 0,79; IC del 95 %: 0,66; 0,95) y tiempo prolongado en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos (OR 0,99; IC del 95 %: 0,99; 0,99). Las personas que recibieron un bloqueo nervioso regional (OR 4,1; IC del 95 %: 1,2, 14) y aquellos que no consumieron opioides posoperatorios (OR 4,6, IC del 95 %: 1-21) tuvieron más probabilidades de tener éxito en el mismo día -descarga.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros hallazgos indican que las comorbilidades y las estancias prolongadas en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos se asociaron con el fracaso del alta el mismo día, mientras que los bloqueos nerviosos regionales y los opioides postoperatorios mínimos se relacionaron con el éxito. Estos factores pueden informar investigaciones futuras destinadas a mejorar los protocolos de recuperación de la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Paradis
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stephan Robitaille
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anna Wang
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Camille Gervais
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patrick Charlebois
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Barry L Stein
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Coeckelberghs E, Bislenghi G, Wolthuis A, Teunkens A, Dewinter G, Coppens S, Vanhaecht K, D'Hoore A. Quality indicators for ambulatory colectomy: literature search and expert consensus. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1894-1901. [PMID: 38316661 PMCID: PMC10978605 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10660-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care for patients undergoing elective colectomy has become increasingly standardized using Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP). ERP, encorporating minimally invasive surgery (MIS), decreased postoperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). However, disruptive changes are needed to safely introduce colectomy in an ambulatory or same-day discharge (SDD) setting. Few research groups showed the feasibility of ambulatory colectomy. So far, no minimum standards for the quality of care of this procedure have been defined. This study aims to identify quality indicators (QIs) that assess the quality of care for ambulatory colectomy. METHODS A literature search was performed to identify recommendations for ambulatory colectomy. Based on that search, a set of QIs was identified and categorized into seven domains: preparation of the patient (pre-admission), anesthesia, surgery, in-hospital monitoring, home monitoring, feasibility, and clinical outcomes. This list was presented to a panel of international experts (surgeons and anesthesiologists) in a 1 round Delphi to assess the relevance of the proposed indicators. RESULTS Based on the literature search (2010-2021), 3841 results were screened on title and abstract for relevant information. Nine papers were withheld to identify the first set of QIs (n = 155). After excluding duplicates and outdated QIs, this longlist was narrowed down to 88 indicators. Afterward, consensus was reached in a 1 round Delphi on a final list of 32 QIs, aiming to be a comprehensive set to evaluate the quality of ambulatory colectomy care. CONCLUSION We propose a list of 32 QI to guide and evaluate the implementation of ambulatory colectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Coeckelberghs
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Gabriele Bislenghi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Teunkens
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geertrui Dewinter
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steve Coppens
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baur K, Sood EM, Huebner M, Ramm C, Kolli N, Cleary RK. Early Discharge after Enhanced Recovery Colectomy Does Not Increase Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions: A Single Institution Analysis. Am Surg 2024:31348241241653. [PMID: 38520237 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241241653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge after colorectal surgery in enhanced recovery pathways is increasing. This study aimed to determine if discharge on postoperative days (POD) one or two is associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions after left and right colectomy. METHODS Single institution retrospective analysis of prospective institutional colorectal surgery database between 07/01/2018 and 07/15/2022. Primary outcomes were ED visit and readmission rates for enhanced recovery open and minimally invasive right and left colectomy using logistic regressions models. RESULTS 820 patients met inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in discharge-day by diagnosis-58.5% of patients with Crohn's disease were discharged on POD ≥4 and 21.6% with benign colon neoplasia were discharged on POD-0-1 (P < .001). ED visits occurred in 12.9% of the study population and were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (P = .096). Overall readmission rate was 8.5% and significantly different between discharge-day groups (0% POD-0 vs 8.3% POD-1 vs 5.8% POD-2 vs 6.9% POD-3 vs 12.9% POD ≥4, P = .041). Logistic regression showed that ED visits and readmissions for longer discharge-days (POD-2, POD-3, POD ≥4) were not significantly different than POD-0-1. Readmission diagnoses for the study population were higher for ileus (17.1%) and surgical site infection (SSI) type-III (22.9%) than for acute kidney injury (1.4%) and SSI type-I/II (1.4%). CONCLUSION Early discharge after left and right colectomy is not associated with increased rates of ED visits and readmissions. Same-day discharge may be feasible in selected enhanced recovery patients. Standardized post-discharge resources that safely allow same-day discharge require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Baur
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Evan M Sood
- University of Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marianne Huebner
- Center for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Carole Ramm
- Department of Academic Research, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nivya Kolli
- Department of Academic Research, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Papanikolaou A, Chen SY, Radomski SN, Stem M, Brown LB, Obias VJ, Graham AE, Chung H. Short-Stay Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Is It Safe? J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:172-181. [PMID: 37937826 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in surgical practices have decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) after surgery. This study aimed to determine the safety of short-stay (≤24-hour) left colectomy for colon cancer patients in the US. STUDY DESIGN Adult colon cancer patients who underwent elective left colectomies were identified using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2012 to 2021). Patients were categorized into 4 LOS groups: LOS 1 day or less (≤24-hour short stay), 2 to 4, 5 to 6, and 7 or more. Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative overall and serious morbidity. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore the association between LOS and overall and serious morbidity. RESULTS A total of 15,745 patients who underwent left colectomies for colon cancer were identified with 294 (1.87%) patients undergoing short stay. Short-stay patients were generally younger and healthier with lower 30-day overall morbidity rates (LOS ≤1 day: 3.74%, 2 to 4: 7.38%, 5 to 6: 16.12%, and ≥7: 37.64%, p < 0.001). Compared with patients with LOS 2 to 4 days, no differences in mortality and readmission rates were observed. On adjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference in the odds of overall (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.60, p = 0.049) and serious morbidity (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.76, p = 0.672) between the short-stay and LOS 2 to 4 days groups. CONCLUSIONS Although currently performed at low rates in the US, short-stay left colectomy is safe for a select group of patients. Attention to patient selection, refinement of clinical pathways, and close follow-up may enable short-stay colectomies to become a more feasible reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos Papanikolaou
- From the Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Atallah SB, Larach SW. Same-day colectomy: are we throwing caution to the wind? Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1137-1138. [PMID: 37725262 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02861-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S B Atallah
- HCA Healthcare Oviedo, Orviedo, FL, USA.
- Adventheath Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bowman D, Proctor C, Richards K, Protyniak B. Having Outpatient Major Elective (HOME) Robotic Colon Resection Protocol: A Safe Approach to Ambulatory Colon Resection. Am Surg 2023; 89:6078-6083. [PMID: 37470507 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231189829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within the past decade, colorectal surgery length of stay (LOS) has decreased from an average of 5-6 days to 2-3 days. However, elective colon resections have yet to become a common procedure with the potential for same-day discharge. During the COVID pandemic, hospital capacity was exceptionally strained and colon resections were delayed due to the lack of inpatient beds available. PURPOSE We sought to create a protocolized ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) pathway that would allow for safe and feasible ambulatory colon resections as well as decreasing overall hospital inpatient burden. RESEARCH DESIGN Between November 2020 and March 2022, 15 patients were offered same-day discharges under the HOME protocol. Of the 15 patients, 11 patients agreed to be discharged home the day of surgery and followed prospectively for 30 days. All procedures were performed robotically. STUDY SAMPLE Patients were selected based on level of preoperative health (ASA class 1 and 2), low-risk for loss to follow-up, ability for close family supervision for 3 days postoperatively, and type of procedure (partial colectomy). Close follow-up was achieved with daily telephonic or televideo visits for 3 days post-operatively, as well as a 2-week outpatient clinic follow-up. DATA COLLECTION A total of 11 patient underwent same-day surgery utilizing the protocol, 5 females and 6 males, between the ages of 34 and 62. All patients were ASA class 2. Indications for colon resection were cecal volvulus (1), recurrent sigmmoid diverticulitis (9), and Crohn's disease (1). Primary outcome was readmission rates within the 30-days. RESULTS There were no readmissions or complications during the perioperative 30-day period. There was one emergency department return for pain who was not admitted. Average operative time was 132.1 minutes. CONCLUSION Using a novel enhanced recovery protocol, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of ambulatory partial colectomy in a highly select small subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daman Bowman
- Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
| | - Charles Proctor
- Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
| | | | - Bogdan Protyniak
- Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abdelnaby A, Alcabes A. Can Colorectal Surgery Be Performed as an Outpatient Surgery? Adv Surg 2023; 57:279-285. [PMID: 37536859 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
The potential to discharge patients safely within the same day after colorectal surgery has developed over time with concurrent advances in concepts of enhanced recovery pathways, along with minimally invasive techniques available to surgeons. The advent of planned same-day discharges after elective colectomy is made possible by research establishing improved length of stay with minimal morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery and especially minimally invasive surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. In tracing the timeline of research and development of knowledge in this setting, the safety of outpatient colorectal surgery can be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abier Abdelnaby
- Colon and Rectal Surgical Services, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| | - Analena Alcabes
- Department of Surgery, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nelson G, Fotopoulou C, Taylor J, Glaser G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Meyer LA, Stone R, Mena G, Elias KM, Altman AD, Bisch SP, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:58-67. [PMID: 37086524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges. METHODS Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Bakkum-Gamez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - L A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R Stone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - G Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K M Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A D Altman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - S P Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vu MM, Curfman KR, Blair GE, Shah CA, Rashidi L. Beyond enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): Evolving minimally invasive colectomy from multi-day admissions to same-day discharge. Am J Surg 2023; 225:826-831. [PMID: 36697356 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early discharge is increasingly important in the resource-limited COVID era. Some groups have reported early experiences with same day discharge (SDD) after colectomy. We implemented a routine SDD protocol and report the evolution in our program's outcomes. METHODS We studied a retrospective cohort of robotic colorectal surgeries from 2016 to 2022. Colectomies were analyzed as a sub-group and stratified by year. RESULTS The cohort comprised 535 cases, of which 483 were colectomies. Annual case volume increased from 58 to 180 cases (p < 0.001). Operative console time concordantly decreased by 33% (p < 0.001). Average length of stay decreased from five to one days. By 2022, 58% of colectomies were selectively discharged on the same day of surgery. Complication and readmission rates remained constant. CONCLUSIONS SDD is feasible and safe in selected patients. We illustrate the practical evolution of a surgical practice toward routine SDD, and discuss the factors we found critical to this transition.
Collapse
|