Day-case (ambulatory) laparoscopic surgery. Let us sing from the same hymn sheet

Day Surgery in Children Undergoing Retroperitoneal Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Is It Safe and Feasible?

Background

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty is the most frequently performed robotic procedure in children. A retroperitoneal approach limits surgical trauma and avoids peritoneal irritation. This led to the establishment of the criteria for day surgery (DS) and a related clinical care pathway.

Objective

To assess the feasibility and safety of DS in children undergoing retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (R-RALP).

Design setting and participants

We performed a bicentric prospective study (NCT03274050) over 2 yr involving the two major paediatric urology teaching hospitals in Paris. A clinical pathway and a prospective research protocol were specifically established.

Intervention

DS in selected children undergoing R-RALP.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary outcomes were DS failure, 30-d complications, and readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, and surgical outcomes. Quantitative variables were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges.

Results and limitations

Thirty-two children fulfilled specific inclusion criteria and were consecutively selected for DS following R-RALP. The median patient age was 7.6 yr (4.1-11.8) and weight 25 kg (14-45). The median console time was 137 min (108-167). There were no intraoperative complications or conversions. Six children were kept under observation overnight and discharged the following day due to persistent pain (n = 3), parental anxiety (n = 2), or a prolonged procedure (n = 1). The median duration of hospital stay of the 26 children in the DS setting was 12.7 h (12.2-13.2). During the 30-d period, there were four emergency room visits (15%) resulting in two patients requiring readmission (8%): one for febrile urinary tract infection (Clavien-Dindo II) and one child with no JJ stent for urinoma (Clavien-Dindo IIIb). Radiological studies confirmed improvement in dilatation for all cases with no recurrence (median follow-up: 15 mo).

Conclusions

This prospective case series is the first to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of DS in children undergoing R-RALP, obviating the need for routine inpatient care. Excellent results can be achieved by careful patient selection, a clear clinical pathway, and a dedicated team. Further evaluation is warranted to assess the cost effectiveness.

Patient summary

This study shows that day surgery after robotic pyeloplasty is both safe and effective in selected children.

Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery in a Free-Standing Ambulatory Setting

To decrease the impact and cost of surgery, there is a trend toward developing treatment models for complex conditions on a fully outpatient basis. This is a retrospective study of the initial experience of advanced laparoscopic procedures performed on a same-day outpatient basis in the ambulatory campus of a university hospital. Over 3 years, 55 patients underwent 50 Nissen fundoplications and 5 adrenalectomies. There were 2 intraoperative complications, with no mortality and no conversion. The median postoperative stay was 4.5 hours. Readmission at 1 month was 11%. Data on the nursing postoperative telephone follow-up were available for 50 patients; 34 (62%) were successfully contacted.Twenty four (70%) had no complaint. Preliminary high-level cost data indicate a cost advantage. Advanced laparoscopic procedures can be done safely in a pure ambulatory setting; the current readmission rate can be reduced with improved pain management and better telephone follow-up strategies. Cost savings are likely.

[Not Available]

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most commonly performed minimal invasive surgery. However, practice of its use as an ambulatory surgery in our hospital settings is uncommon.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate safety and cost effectiveness of LC as an ambulatory day care surgery.

STUDY DESIGN:

Quasiexperimental.

SETTING:

Department of surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were selected for Ambulatory LC. They were admitted electively on the same day and operated on in the morning hours and discharged after a check by the surgeon 6–8 hrs later.

RESULTS:

Of fifty (n = 50) patients selected for ambulatory LC, 92% were discharged successfully after 6–8 hrs observation. No significant perioperative complications were noted. Unplanned admission and readmission rate was 8 and 2%, respectively. Cost saving for the daycare surgery was Rs. 6,200, Rs. 13,300, and Rs.22,800 per patient as compared to in patient general, semiprivate, and private ward package, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Practice ambulatory LC is safe and cost-effective in selected patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones.

Day Care Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Next Standard of Care for Gall Stone Disease

Background

To access the feasibility, safety and success of day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary center in India.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between 2004 and 2009 from a tertiary center in north India. All patients of symptomatic gallstone diseases having age less than 70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and grade II, living within 20 Kilometers of the hospital, availability of a responsible adult care taker at home, access to a telephone and a means of transportation to hospital if needed, underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the care of the two participating surgeons, were considered for day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clinical and operative data were recorded prospectively. All patients were discharged 6 to 8 hours after surgery with the advice to contact the surgical team over phone whenever necessary or on the day after discharge.

Results

A total of 602 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed over a period of 6years, among them 309 (51.32%) were operated on day care basis. Nine patients in day care procedure group had conversion to open procedure (5 due to distorted anatomy of calot’s triangle, 2 due to common bile duct stones, 1 due to bile duct injury and 1 due to bleeding from cystic artery stump). One patient had myocardial infarction and 3 had nausea and vomiting which failed to resolve by intravenous ondensteron and all these (13) patients (4.20%) needed unplanned admission to the hospital. Two hundred and ninety-six patients (95.79%) were discharged on same day.

Conclusions

In conclusion day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible, safe and equally effective in selected patients in Indian setup.

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 250 patients

BACKGROUND

Patient selection, postoperative monitoring and discharge criteria after outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are not clearly defined.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective LC who fulfilled socioeconomic requirements for ambulatory surgery were enrolled in an open prospective study. Choledocholithiasis, ASA IV and unstable ASA III patients were excluded. Discharge was allowed after at least 6 hours if patients were conscious, asymptomatic, ambulant, with normal vital signs, no evidence of bleeding, spontaneous micturition and tolerating soft diet.

RESULTS

Of the 250 patients included, 10.4% were admitted due to intraoperative causes. Of the remaining, 92% were discharged on the same day and 8.0% were admitted for pain control or postoperative anxiety/discomfort. Neither mortality or major complications were observed. Ninety-five percent of patients declared themselves satisfied. History of jaundice, common bile duct dilation on ultrasound, microlithiasis, abnormal preoperative alkaline phosphatase levels and surgeon's experience were independent predictors of admission due to intraoperative causes. No predictor of postoperative admission was identified. Cost analysis showed a benefit for ambulatory LC compared to overnight stay.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient LC is feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction even with broad selection criteria. Improvements may be achieved in postoperative pain management.

Postoperative pain treatment for ambulatory surgery

One of the most significant changes in surgical practice during the last two decades has been the growth of ambulatory surgery. Adequate postoperative analgesia is a prerequisite for successful ambulatory surgery. Recent studies have shown that large numbers of patients suffer from moderate to severe pain during the first 24-48 hr. The success of fast-tracking depends to a considerable extent on effective postoperative pain management routines and the cost saving of outpatient surgery may be negated by unanticipated hospital admission for poorly treated pain. Depending on the intensity of postoperative pain current management includes the use of analgesics such as paracetamol, NSAIDs including coxibs and tramadol as single drugs or in combination as part of balanced (multimodal) analgesia. However, in the ambulatory setting many patients suffer from pain at home in spite of multimodal analgesic regimens. Sending patients home with perineural, incisional, and intra-articular catheters is a new and evolving area of postoperative pain management. Current evidence suggests that these techniques are effective, feasible and safe in the home environment if appropriate patient selection routines and organization for follow-up are in place.

Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty aims to reproduce the excellent functional outcomes of open pyeloplasty while diminishing procedural morbidity.

METHODS

Six patients fulfilled specific inclusion criteria for outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty: informed consent, body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or less, primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction, uncomplicated laparoscopic surgery completed by 12:00 pm, and postoperative pain control by oral analgesics. All patients had a double-J ureteral stent placed cystoscopically before laparoscopic access. No drains were placed postoperatively.

RESULTS

All 6 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (3 left, 3 right) using the retroperitoneal (n = 5) or transperitoneal (n = 1) approach. The average patient age was 22 years. The mean surgical time was 223 minutes (range 165 to 270), the mean blood loss was 82 mL (range 10 to 250), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 359 minutes (range 226 to 424). Postoperative analgesia comprised a mean of 6 mg morphine sulfate and 32 mg of ketorolac. No complications or readmissions occurred postoperatively. Intravenous urography and Lasix technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scans documented resolution of obstruction. With long-term follow-up (mean 38.4 months), no recurrences have developed.

CONCLUSIONS

We report our initial series of ambulatory laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In this well-selected patient population, outpatient pyeloplasty was feasible and safe.

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hong Kong Chinese -- an outcome analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the procedure of choice for symptomatic gallbladder disease. Although many recent studies, mostly from abroad, report that it can be performed safely in the outpatient setting, the experience of outpatient LC in Hong Kong is still limited. This retrospective study evaluated the feasibility, safety and patient acceptance of outpatient LC in Hong Kong Chinese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of 73 consecutive patients who had undergone outpatient LC between February 2000 and October 2002 in the Day Surgery Centre of Tung Wah Hospital were prospectively collected and reviewed. The selection criteria for patients undergoing outpatient LC included American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification I or II, age less than 70 years, and the availability of a competent adult to accompany the patient home and look after them for 24 hours. No effort was made to exclude complicated cases. After assessment by the operating surgeon, patients were discharged from the Day Surgery Centre in the afternoon when their clinical condition satisfied pre-defined discharge criteria. All patients were followed up in the Day Surgery Centre in the first and fourth postoperative weeks.

RESULTS

The same-day discharge rate was 88% and the conversion rate was 4%. Six patients (8.2%) with uneventful LC required hospitalization after the procedure. There was no major complication and no unplanned admission. Two patients had port site wound infection requiring hospital admission at the first follow-up. Patient satisfaction was high, pain acceptance was good, and analgesic consumption was minimal. Mild fat intolerance was common in patients postoperatively (> 50%), but this had almost all resolved by postoperative week four. All patients were able to resume their usual daily activities within 2 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LC is a safe and feasible outpatient procedure in Hong Kong, with high levels of patient satisfaction. A prospective study with a larger patient population is warranted to verify whether it should be recommended as treatment for gallstone disease in selected patients in future.

Outpatient Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernioplasty

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) has become an established treatment for the repair of inguinal hernia but its application as an outpatient procedure has not been widely adopted. The present study was undertaken to audit the outcomes of outpatient TEP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 2001 to May 2003, 102 consecutive patients with 114 inguinal hernias underwent outpatient TEP. The mean age of the study population was 55 years with a male to female ratio of 100:2. Perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were prospectively evaluated and analyzed.

RESULTS

All TEP were successfully performed. Ninety-nine patients (97%) were discharged uneventfully on the day of operation. Three patients were admitted because of ECG changes (n = 2) and dizziness (n = 1). A single patient was readmitted on postoperative day (POD) 1 because of wound pain and vomiting. All these patients recovered uneventfully. One-third of the patients did not require any analgesia during the postoperative period. Postoperative morbidity included asymptomatic seroma (n = 12), mild scrotal bruising (n = 2), and fever (n = 1). These morbidities resolved spontaneously without the need for surgical intervention. Ninety-five patients (93%) resumed normal outdoor activities within one week.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient TEP was safe and effective with a success rate of 97%. Postoperative pain was mild and more than 90% of the patients resumed normal outdoor activities within a week. Outpatient TEP may emerge to become the preferred method for the management of inguinal hernia.

Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was carried out to assess the feasibility of performing true day-case laparoscopic surgery in a district general hospital.

METHODS

All patients admitted consecutively under the care of one surgeon for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. Selection criteria for a day-case procedure included an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I or II and the availability of a responsible carer at home. Patients were discharged 4-6 h after surgery with a standard analgesia pack and a contact number for advice. All patients were contacted by telephone on the day after discharge. A postal questionnaire was sent to the first 100 patients to assess satisfaction with the day-case process.

RESULTS

Of 357 patients admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 24-month period, 154 (43.1 per cent) were operated on as day cases on a morning theatre list. Twenty-two patients required an overnight stay (14.3 per cent), three because of conversion to an open procedure. One patient was readmitted for neck pain. Eighty-two (92.1 per cent) of 89 patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the day-case procedure.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated a low rate of overnight stay (14.3 per cent) and readmission (1.9 per cent), and a high degree of patient satisfaction for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Surgical aspects and future developments of laparoscopy

Laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery and in the process influenced the practice of anesthesiology. This article reviews several minimal access procedures that have been accepted into practice, are gaining acceptance, or remain investigational. Absolute contraindications to laparoscopy have been emphasized. As the threshold for primary care physicians to refer sicker and sicker patients for surgery decreases, it is crucial for the anesthesiologist to understand physiologic stresses of pneumoperitoneum and the nuances of laparoscopic surgery. The anesthesiologist also can be recruited to adjust insufflation pressures, tweak images on monitors, rotate and position the patient, or pass balloons and bougies. With patient and surgeon expectation of no pain or nausea and early discharge, anesthetic choices become vital for the ultimate success of the procedure.

Day-case laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Based on a series of successful outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomies, day-case laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was introduced in January 1997. The initial results are reported.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II, living within 30 min travel from the hospital, and adult company at home. Initially only selected patients were offered day-case treatment, but later it was adopted as routine. The patients underwent general intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, and were given ketorolac, propacetamol, droperidol and ondansetron as prophylaxis against postoperative pain and nausea. The surgical procedure was Nissen-Rosetti fundoplication or semifundoplication depending on oesophageal manometric results.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included. Four patients were admitted; 41 were discharged as planned 3-8 h after operation, and five of these patients were readmitted. One underwent reoperation for necrosis of the gastric fundus. A further five patients visited the outpatient department without need for admission. At follow-up 31 patients were satisfied with the day-case treatment, five were indifferent, and five were dissatisfied because of pain. If offered a similar operation in the future, 26 patients would have preferred and seven would have accepted day-case treatment, and eight would not.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient laparoscopic fundoplication is safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients.

Extending the limits: minimally invasive surgery

Minimally invasive technology is being applied to an increasing number of surgical procedures. It remains to be seen which techniques will eventually become a 'gold standard' as has the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and which will fall by the wayside. In the meantime, anesthesiologists must be aware of the unique requirements and complications of laparoscopic surgery.

Advances in laparoscopic surgery

After a brief account of the origins of laparoscopy and of its development into an interventional technique thanks to technical improvement, the author gives a dynamic state of the art in laparoscopic surgery, beginning with a description of his original classification method for laparoscopic procedures according to their level of use. Before tackling the highly controversial issue of laparoscopic surgery for cancer, he reviews in detail the various operations successfully performed by laparoscopy for the treatment of nonmalignant abdominal disorders and acute syndromes, all the while checking their results against those obtained with their open counterparts. As the various procedures are described, the interest of the laparoscopic approach becomes clearly visible, based on the excellent view of the operative field that allows diagnostic accuracy, thus avoiding unnecessary operations, and precise dissection with minimal damage. However, the laparoscopic approach is highly dependent on the surgeon's proficiency, itself depending on experience and therefore on the frequency of occurrence of the disorder, and on the progress in and availability of adequate equipments. The last chapter looks into the future of this ever-expanding approach and defines two great trends in its evolution, one accessible to the individual surgeon, the gradual adaptation of open procedures into laparoscopic ones, the other at the institutional level, in view of the huge financial support involved if high technologies are to be systematically integrated in this new surgery. What will the future be like?