Effect of intraoperative and/or postoperative esketamine administration on preventing postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of intraoperative and/or postoperative esketamine application on the prevention of postpartum depression (PPD). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were thoroughly searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the application of esketamine for postnatal depression prevention. Nine RCTs including 1277 participants were involved in the final analysis. It was found that intraoperative and/or postoperative administration of esketamine significantly reduced the PPD incidence and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scores in the early postoperative period. Meanwhile, esketamine lowered the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting with no influence on other psychiatric symptoms.

Knowledge-based, computerized, patient clinical decision support system for perioperative pain, nausea and constipation management: a clinical feasibility study

Opioid administration is particularly challenging in the perioperative period. Computerized-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are a promising innovation that might improve perioperative pain control. We report the development and feasibility validation of a knowledge-based CDSS aiming at optimizing the management of perioperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and laxative medications. This novel CDSS uses patient adaptive testing through a smartphone display, literature-based rules, and individual medical prescriptions to produce direct medical advice for the patient user. Our objective was to test the feasibility of the clinical use of our CDSS in the perioperative setting. This was a prospective single arm, single center, cohort study conducted in Strasbourg University Hospital. The primary outcome was the agreement between the recommendation provided by the experimental device and the recommendation provided by study personnel who interpreted the same care algorithm (control). Thirty-seven patients were included in the study of which 30 (81%) used the experimental device. Agreement between these two care recommendations (computer driven vs. clinician driven) was observed in 51 out 54 uses of the device (94.2% [95% CI 85.9-98.4%]). The agreement level had a probability of 86.6% to exceed the 90% clinically relevant agreement threshold. The knowledge-based, patient CDSS we developed was feasible at providing recommendations for the treatment of pain, PONV and constipation in a perioperative clinical setting.Trial registration number & date The study protocol was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov before enrollment began (NCT05707247 on January 26th, 2023).

Analysis of influencing factors and construction of prediction model for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of bariatric surgeries, the high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with this surgery has also gradually attracted attention. Among the common bariatric surgery methods, patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have the highest incidence of nausea and vomiting. The mechanism of occurrence of PONV is very complex. This study aims to explore the influencing factors of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and construct a nomogram prediction model based on these factors.

METHODS

With the approval of the Ethics Committee, the electronic medical records of patients who underwent LSG from July 2022 to May 2023 were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients with complete medical records who underwent LSG from July 2022 to May 2023 were included in this study. Among them, 46 patients developed PONV, resulting in a PONV incidence rate of 40.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender, the use of inhalation anesthesia, and operation time ≥ 120 min were risk factors for PONV in LSG. Additionally, the use of more than two kinds of antiemetic drugs was identified as a protective factor. Based on these factors, a nomogram model was constructed.

CONCLUSION

PONV in patients undergoing LSG is related to gender, type of anesthesia, duration of surgery, and combination therapy with antiemetic drugs. The nomogram prediction model constructed in this study demonstrates high accuracy and discrimination in predicting the occurrence of PONV in patients undergoing LSG.

Is Intravenous Dextrose Infusion During Emergence From Anesthesia Effective in Improving the PONV in Gynecologic Laparoscopy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the relationship between intravenous 5% dextrose infusion during emergence from anesthesia to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into the experimental group and control group using a computer-generated random number generator. Intervenors and measurers were blinded to group assignments of the study.

SETTING

A single academic tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

On completion of surgery, participants were randomized into the test group (receive 5% dextrose) and control group (receive Ringer's lactate solution).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome of the present study was the incidence of PONV. Other outcomes included postoperative rescue analgesic and rescue antiemetic, postoperative pain response, and recovery time of postanesthesia care unit. Baseline characteristics were statistically similar between the 2 groups of participants. There were 49 of 105 patients experienced PONV within 24 hours postoperatively. The overall incidence of PONV within 24 hours postoperatively was not significantly different (45.5% vs 48%; relative risk [RR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.37; p = .794). However, fewer patients experienced PONV in the test group than in the control group during 0 to 1 hours (6.0% vs 20.0%; RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99; p = .024) and 1 to 3 hours (14.5% vs 32.0%; RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99; p = .033) postoperatively. In addition, recovery time in the postanesthesia care unit was less in the test group (17.07 ± 6.36 vs 22.04 ± 7.33; mean difference, -4.97; 95% CI, -7.62 to -2.32; p <.001) and pain score was lower in the test group during 0 to 0.5 hours postoperatively (2.29 ± 1.74 vs 3.08 ± 1.64; mean difference, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.45 to -0.13; p = .019).

CONCLUSION

In patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, postanesthesia 5% dextrose infusion may be useful in improving the early management of PONV and pain response and may warrant further study.

[Opioid-free anesthesia : Wrong track or meaningful exit from the era of opioid-based analgesia?]

The limitations and disadvantages of opioids in anesthesia are very well known but the advantages combined with a lack of effective alternatives even now still prevents refraining from using opioids as part of an adequate pain therapy. For decades, pain research has had the declared goal of replacing opioids with new substances which have no serious side effects; however, currently this goal seems to be a long way off. Due to the media coverage of the "opioid crisis" in North America, the use of opioids for pain management is also increasingly being questioned by the patients. Measures to contain this crisis are only slowly taking effect in view of the increasing number of deaths, which is why the triggers are still being sought. The perioperative administration of opioids is not only a possible gateway to addiction and abuse but it can also cause outcome-relevant complications, such as respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting and an increase in postoperative pain. Therefore, these considerations gave rise to the idea of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), i.e., opioids are not administered as part of anesthesia to carry out surgical procedures. Although this idea may make sense at first glance, a rapid introduction of this concept appears to be risky as it entails significant changes for the entire anesthesiological management. Based on relatively robust data from clinical studies, this concept can now be evaluated and discussed not only emotionally but also objectively. This review article presents arguments for or against the complete avoidance of intraoperative or even perioperative opioids. The current conditions in Germany are primarily taken into account, so that the perioperative pain therapy is transferable to the established standards. The results from current clinical studies on the implementation of an opioid-free anesthesia are summarized and discussed.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting in orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequently reported adverse event following orthognathic surgery. The aim of this work is to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the subject, and to discuss the role of maxillofacial surgeons and the steps that can be taken to prevent or control PONV in orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the search strategy: (orthognathic AND (nausea OR vomiting)). The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Dimensions, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, without any language restrictions. RevMan 5.4 was used to create a risk of bias graph and a forest plot.

RESULTS

The included articles were classified as having a low risk of bias, despite the limited literature on the subject. Various measures have been reported to be beneficial in preventing or managing PONV, such as the use of dexamethasone, antiemetic drugs, gastric aspiration, and anesthetic blocks. Effective bleeding control and faster surgeries can also be helpful.

CONCLUSIONS

Throat packs have not been found to be effective in preventing PONV. Although no definitive protocol has been established in the literature, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol could be a useful approach. Overall, a multimodal approach may be taken to prevent PONV, and further research is needed to establish definitive protocols.

Olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The antiemetic effectiveness of olanzapine, as a prophylactic off-label antiemetic drug, for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors evaluate the efficacy and side effects of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic in adult patients who undergo general anesthesia and assess adverse effects.

METHODS

A systematic search was done on electronic bibliographic databases in July 2023. Randomized controlled trials of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic for PONV in adults who underwent general anesthesia were included. The authors excluded non-RCTs and retracted studies. The authors set no date of publication or language limits. The outcomes were the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively and the safety of olanzapine. The risk of bias was assessed according to the tool suggested by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis included 446 adult patients. Olanzapine reduced on average 38 % the incidence of PONV. The estimated risk ratio (95 % CI) of olanzapine versus control was 0.62 (0.42-0.90), p = 0.010, I2 = 67 %. In the subgroup meta-analysis, doses of olanzapine (10 mg) reduced on average 49 % of the incidence of PONV (RR = 0.51 [0.34-0.77], p = 0.001, I2 = 31 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review with meta-analysis indicated that olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic alone or combined with other antiemetic agents reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, this conclusion must be presented with some degree of uncertainty due to the small number of studies included. There was a lack of any evidence to draw conclusions on side effects.

Intraoperative Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Microvascular Decompression

BACKGROUND

We performed this study to investigate the effect of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential (IBAEP) changes on the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after microvascular decompression (MVD) for neurovascular cross compression.

METHODS

A total of 373 consecutive cases were treated with MVD. The use of rescue antiemetics after surgery was used as an objective indicator of PONV. IBAEP monitoring was routinely performed in all.

RESULTS

The use of rescue antiemetics was significantly associated with female sex (OR = 3.427; 95% CI, 2.077-5.654; P < 0.001), PCA use (OR = 3.333; 95% CI, 1.861-5.104; P < 0.001), and operation time (OR = 1.017; 95% CI, 1.008-1.026; P < 0.001). A Wave V peak delay of more than 1.0 milliseconds showed a significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics (OR = 1.787; 95% CI, 1.114-2.867; P = 0.016) and a strong significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics more than 5 times (OR = 2.426; 95% CI, 1.372-4.290; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A wave V peak delay of more than 1.0 milliseconds might have value as a predictor of PONV after MVD. More detailed neurophysiological studies will identify the exact pathophysiology underlying PONV after MVD.

Comparison of prophylaxis strategy for postoperative nausea and vomiting and its incidence before and after the implementation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 in surgical setting: a single-center, retrospective study

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between adherence to guideline-recommended risk-based postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, the antiemetics used for PONV prophylaxis, and the incidence of PONV in patients who were underwent general anesthesia before and after 5-HT3 receptor antagonists became available.

METHODS

Patients (≥ 20 years old) who were extubated after scheduled surgery and returned to general wards between January 2021 and February 2022 and between June 2022 and July 2023 were included. Risk factors included age < 50, female, motion sickness, nonsmoker, surgical factors, and postoperative opioid use. Two and three or more prophylaxis were recommended for patients with one or two and three or more risk factors, respectively. The primary outcome was the number of patients who received adequate prophylaxis, and the secondary outcomes were antiemetic agents used during anesthesia and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1. PONV was defined as documented PONV or rescue antiemetic administration.

RESULTS

From January 2021 to February 2022 and from June 2022 to July 2023, 2342 and 2682 patients were included, respectively. Before ondansetron became available, more D2 receptor antagonists were used (p < 0.001), and after ondansetron became available, both ondansetron (p < 0.001) and propofol (p < 0.001) were given more frequently. Before and after ondansetron became available, the number of patients with adequate prophylaxis was 3.7% and 9.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), and the incidence of PONV on postoperative days 0 and 1 was 44.6% and 44.0%, respectively (p = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The availability of ondansetron increased the number of patients with adequate PONV prophylaxis, but did not decrease the incidence of PONV.

Prevalence and time course of postoperative nausea and vomiting and severe pain in patients under general anesthesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia

Introduction

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain are common and distressing complications in patients undergoing surgery. However, it remains uncertain whether timing of the postoperative course or the diel rhythm influences the occurrence of PONV or severe pain. Therefore, we aimed to explore the temporal distribution of PONV and severe pain.

Material and methods

In this prospective observational study, we enrolled patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications I-III, who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were visited postoperatively at regular intervals (every 6 h over a 24-h period). Incidence of PONV was recorded and categorized based on real-time divisions: before dawn (00:00-05:59), morning (06:00-11:59), afternoon (12:00-17:59), and evening (18:00-23:59) and as sequential periods (i.e., 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, and 18-24 h). Severe pain and use of additional remedies were also recorded.

Results

A total of 724 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 14.92 % experienced PONV within the first 6 h, and 8.29 % received antiemetic therapy. Occurrence of PONV and administration of remedies declined over the 24-h postoperative period. The lowest rate of PONV was observed during the pre-dawn hours (5.66 %). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of PONV 24-h postoperatively between surgeries with different end times. Patients underwent orthopedic surgeries had the highest incidence of PONV during 18:00-23:59, gynecological surgery patients had the highest incidence at 12:00-17:59, and 6:00-11:59 for other surgery patients. All patients had the lowest incidence during 0:00-5:59. During the initial 6-h postoperative period, 24.59 % of patients experienced severe pain, which declined in the remaining episodes. Patients who underwent orthopedic and gynecological surgeries exhibited similar temporal patterns and distribution characteristics of PONV and severe pain.

Discussion

Both PONV and severe pain declined within the 24-h postoperative period, particularly within the first 6 h. Additionally, the onset patterns of PONV vary among patients undergoing different types of surgeries, all patients demonstrated decreased susceptibility to PONV between 00:00-05:59. Our findings enhance prevention and treatment strategies within an optimized timeframe during the postoperative course.

Impact of body weight-based dosing of palonosetron and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse effect following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Palonosetron with a standard dosing (75 μg) schedule has been questioned due to its low efficiency in obese patients. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the body weight-based dosing of palonosetron in managing PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, double-blinded randomized study was conducted between August 2021 and December 2021. Patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were prospectively recruited in the study. One hundred patients were randomly divided into palonosetron (Group P) and ondansetron (Group O). The demographic and clinical variables were recorded. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of PONV between the two groups during the hospitalization. The secondary outcomes were the number of rescue anti-emetic and analgesic medications and the Functional Living Index-Emesis scores.

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in each group (Group P and Group O). There were significant differences in the scores of POVN, nausea, and vomiting favoring Group P. In Group P, the rate of patients using rescue anti-emetics was significantly lower. The incidence of complete response and proportion of patients with higher Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were significantly higher in patients using palonosetron.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of palonosetron significantly reduced the incidence of PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. There was a significant improvement in the scores of Functional Living Index-Emesis in patients using palonosetron.

Reduced side effects and improved pain management by continuous ketorolac infusion with patient-controlled fentanyl injection compared with single fentanyl administration in pelviscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study

BACKGROUND

A combination of opioids and adjunctive drugs can be used for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to minimize opioid-related side effects. We investigated whether two different analgesics administered separately via a dual-chamber PCA have fewer side effects with adequate analgesia than a single fentanyl PCA in gynecologic pelviscopic surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled study included 68 patients who underwent pelviscopic gynecological surgery. Patients were allocated to either the dual (ketorolac and fentanyl delivered by a dual-chamber PCA) or the single (fentanyl alone) group. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and analgesic quality were compared between the two groups at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

The dual group showed a significantly lower incidence of PONV during postoperative 2-6 h (P = 0.011) and 6-12 h (P = 0.009). Finally, only two patients (5.7%) in the dual group and 18 (54.5%) in the single group experienced PONV during the entire postoperative 24 h and could not maintain intravenous PCA (odds ratio: 0.056, 95% CI [0.007, 0.229], P < 0.001). Despite the administration of less fentanyl via intravenous PCA during the postoperative 24 h in the dual group than in the single group (66.0 ± 77.8 vs. 383.6 ± 70.1 μg, P < 0.001), postoperative pain had no significant intergroup difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Two different analgesics, continuous ketorolac and intermittent fentanyl bolus, administered via dual-chamber intravenous PCA, showed fewer side effects with adequate analgesia than conventional intravenous fentanyl PCA in gynecologic patients undergoing pelviscopic surgery.

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of nausea and vomiting following craniotomy is high, and pericardium 6 (P6; Neiguan) acupoint stimulation is an important strategy for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at P6 as an adjunct to antiemetic drugs to prevent PONV after craniotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for craniotomy. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to a TEAS or sham TEAS group. The incidence of PONV, pain score, and postoperative remedial treatment with antiemetics and analgesics at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h after craniotomy were assessed.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 0-2 and 6-24 h after craniotomy, the incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 2-6 h, the incidence of vomiting was higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (29.3 % vs. 14.0 %, P = 0.047). During 0-2 and 2-6 h, the pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). During 6-24 h after craniotomy, the pain score was significantly higher in the sham TEAS group than in the TEAS group (P = 0.001). The degree of nausea and proportion of patients requiring antiemetic drugs were not significantly different between the two groups in each period (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TEAS at P6 may reduce vomiting incidence and pain scores following craniotomy.

Comparison of three different prophylactic treatments for postoperative nausea and vomiting after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after total joint arthroplasty is common and associated with delayed recovery. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three different prophylactic regimens for PONV after total joint arthroplasty under general anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were randomized to Group A (ondansetron), Group B (10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride), or Group C (three doses of 10 mg dexamethasone plus ondansetron and mosapride). The primary outcome was the total incidence of PONV during postoperative 48 h. The secondary outcomes were complete response, rescue antiemetic treatment, opioid consumption, time until first defecation, postoperative appetite score, satisfaction score, length of hospital stay, blood glucose level, and complications.

RESULTS

Patients in Group C experienced a lower incidence of total PONV (29.3%, p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of complete response (70.7%, p = 0.001) than did patients in Group A (51.9%, 48.2%, respectively). Patients in Group C also experienced a lower incidence of severe PONV (4.3%) than patients in Group A (25.9%, p<0.001) and B (20.4%, p<0.001). Moreover, less rescue antiemetic treatment (1.4 ± 0.5 mg Metoclopramide) and postoperative opioid consumption (1.8 ± 0.3 mg Oxycodone, 6.0 ± 1.0 mg Pethidine) was needed in Group C. Additionally, a shorter time until first defecation, shorter length of stay, and better postoperative appetite scores and satisfaction scores were detected in patients in Group C. A slight increase in the fasting blood glucose level was observed in Group C, and the complications were comparable among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Combined use of ondansetron, mosapride and three doses of dexamethasone can provide better antiemetic effectiveness, postoperative appetite, bowel function recovery, and pain relief than a single dose or ondansetron only.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

The protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015896, April 27, 2018).

Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that, within the margin of 15% of risk difference, palonosetron is not inferior to ondansetron in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial of 212 patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia in two secondary care hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either palonosetron (0.075.ßmg) or ondansetron (8.ßmg) intravenously at induction of anesthesia. Ondansetron (8.ßmg) was also administered 8 and 16.ßhours postoperatively. All anesthetic and surgical procedures were standardized. Patients were evaluated for 24.ßhours postoperatively for the occurrence of PONV.

RESULTS

A high incidence of PONV was observed at 2...6.ßhours postoperatively, with a rate of 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.2...46.3) in the palonosetron group, as compared to 43.4% (95% CI 34.4...52.9) in the ondansetron group. The risk difference (95% CI) between palonosetron and ondansetron for PONV was 0 (-10.9 to 10.9) at 0...2.ßhours, -6.6 (-19.4 to 6.5) at 2...6.ßhours, -0.9 (-11.0 to 9.2) at 6...12.ßhours, and -2.8 (-9.6 to 3.6) at 12...24.ßhours. There was no statistically significant difference between the palonosetron and ondansetron groups in the use of rescue medication (dimenhydrinate). There were no adverse events associated with the medications under study.

CONCLUSION

Palonosetron is not inferior to ondansetron in patients at risk of PONV undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, providing a good option for PONV prophylaxis, as it can be administered in a single dose.

Assessing the impact of aprepitant and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in orthognathic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common side effect associated with general anesthesia. Both ondansetron and aprepitant been effectively used to prevent PONV. However, there is a disagreement of opinions regarding the superiority of these two drugs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of aprepitant with ondansetron in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgeries.

METHODS

In this double-blinded clinical trial, 80 patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were randomly assigned to two groups. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used for all patients. The first group received a placebo capsule administered one hour before the surgical procedure along with 4 mg (2 ml) of ondansetron intravenously after anesthesia induction. The second group was given 80 mg aprepitant capsules one hour before the surgery, followed by an injection of 2 ml intravenous distilled water after anesthesia induction. The occurrence and severity of PONV, the amount of rescue medication required, and the complete response of patients assessed within 24 h after the surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in the aprepitant group had a significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea (2.5% versus 27.5%), vomiting (5% versus 25%), and required fewer rescue medications (7.5% versus 62.5%) compared to the ondansetron group. Additionally, the aprepitant group showed a higher complete response rate (90% versus 67.5%) in the 0-2 and 12-24 postoperative hours.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of this study, aprepitant has demonstrated a greater efficacy in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgery, when compared to ondansetron.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT code: IRCT20211205053279N3), date of registration: 16/12/2022.

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) preparations for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Ginger has been proposed for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), however it remains equivocal whether ginger can be an alternative option and which certain preparation is optimal for PONV prophylaxis.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank relative efficacy for PONV control among all available ginger preparations collected in the databases.

METHODS

Eligible records were identified by retrieving Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CNKI, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of ginger therapies for the prophylaxis of PONV. A bayesian NMA within random-effects models was implemented. Certainty of evidence for estimates was investigated following GRADE framework. We prospectively registered the protocol (CRD 42021246073) in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

Eighteen publications comprising 2199 participants with PONV were identified. Ginger oil (RR [95%CI], 0.39 [0.16, 0.96]) appeared to have the highest probability of being ranked best to decrease the incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV), with statistical significance compared with placebo, based on high to moderate confidence in estimates. With regard to reducing postoperative nausea (PON), statistically superiority was not observed in ginger regimens compared with placebo based on moderate to low certainty of evidence. Reduction in antemetic use and nausea intensity were noticed in ginger powder and oil. Ginger was significantly associated with better efficacy for Asian, older age, higher dosage, preoperative administration, hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ginger oil appeared to be superior to other ginger treatments for the prophylaxis of POV. With regard to reducing PON, ginger preparations indicated no obvious advantages.

A nomogram to predict postoperative nausea and vomiting in the ward following laparoscopic bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication of laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). However, there is a lack of effective integrated prediction models for preventing and treating PONV in patients after LBS.

METHODS

Based on a randomized controlled trial conducted between November 1, 2021, and May 13, 2022, we included 334 participants who underwent LBS according to the inclusion criteria. The database was divided randomly into training and validation cohorts in a ratio of 7:3. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator plus multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors and construct a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed and validated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and a decision curve analysis (DCA). We also explored specific risk factors for PONV in patients with diabetes.

RESULTS

The subjects were divided randomly into training (n = 234) and validation (n = 100) cohorts. Age, history of diabetes, type of surgery, and sugammadex use were incorporated to construct a nomogram prediction model. In the training cohort, the AUC and the optimism-corrected C-index were 0.850 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.801-0.899] and 0.848, while in the validation cohort they were 0.847 (95% CI 0.768-0.925) and 0.844, respectively. The calibration plots showed good agreement between the predicted and actual observations. The DCA results demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The type of surgery, sugammadex use, and insulin level at 120 min were predictors of PONV in patients with diabetes with an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.705-0.898).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a prediction model for PONV in patients after LBS. A risk factor analysis of PONV in patients with diabetes provides clinicians with a more precise prophylactic protocol.

Effect of anesthesia induction with butorphanol on postoperative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications that affect the recovery and well-being of elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery.

AIM

To investigate the effect of butorphanol on PONV in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 110 elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) who underwent gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to receive butorphanol (40 μg/kg) or sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg) during anesthesia induction in a 1:1 ratio. The measured outcomes included the incidence of PONV at 48 h after surgery, intraoperative dose of propofol and remifentanil, Bruggrmann Comfort Scale score in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), number of compressions for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), and time to first flatulence after surgery.

RESULTS

The results revealed a noteworthy reduction in the occurrence of PONV at 24 h after surgery in the butorphanol group, when compared to the sufentanil group (T1: 23.64% vs 5.45%, T2: 43.64% vs 20.00%, P < 0.05). However, no significant variations were observed between the two groups, in terms of the clinical characteristics, such as the PONV or motion sickness history, intraoperative and postoperative 48-h total infusion volume and hemodynamic parameters, intraoperative dose of propofol and remifentanil, number of postoperative PCIA compressions, time until the first occurrence of postoperative flatulence, and incidence of PONV at 48 h post-surgery (all, P > 0.05). Furthermore, patients in the butorphanol group were more comfortable, when compared to patients in the sufentanil group in the PACU.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that butorphanol can be an efficacious substitute for sufentanil during anesthesia induction to diminish PONV within 24 h following gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery in the elderly, simultaneously improving patient comfort in the PACU.

Effect of dexamethasone and ramosetron on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in low-risk patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics in patients at low risk of developing PONV.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 177 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups. Patients allocated to group C (control group) received 2 mL of intravenous 0.9% saline, those allocated to group R (ramosetron group) received 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron, and those allocated to group DR (ramosetron plus dexamethasone group) received 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron.

RESULTS

Finally, 174 patients completed the study, and the types of surgeries were orthopedic (n = 80), rhinologic (n = 47), urologic (n = 29), and others (n = 18). The incidence of PONV up to 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in group DR than in group C. The incidence of PONV up to 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. The usage pattern of rescue antiemetics was consistent with the incidence of PONV. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of dexamethasone and ramosetron demonstrated a superior effect in preventing PONV for 48 h after surgery under general anesthesia than saline in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Compared with saline injections, ramosetron injections yielded better outcomes for the incidence of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesics 0-1 h postoperatively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration number: criskorea@korea.kr, KCT0006749.

Research trends of acupuncture therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting from 2011 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of acupuncture as a therapeutic intervention for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting has experienced a notable increase in its popularity, and the purpose of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the level of concern within the academic discipline and the main contributors and their partnership, as well as to identify research focal points and trends.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was carried out to identify relevant articles on the topic of acupuncture therapy for PONV in the Web of Science and China National Knowledge Internet. The search spanned from January 1, 2011, to June 6, 2023. The annual publications were count to see the degree of scholarly attention devoted to the discipline and how it has changed over time. A statistical analysis of article distribution across various journals was conducted to serve a rough indicator for assessing the quality of articles. And a bibliometric analysis was conducted using the software CiteSpace to visually analyze various aspects of the literature. Analyze authors, institutions and countries to identify the main contributors and their collaborative relationship; and analyze keywords and references to explore research hotspots and trends.

RESULTS

This study examined a comprehensive collection of 819 articles focused on acupuncture therapy for PONV, demonstrating a varying upward trend in the quantity of publications. Notably, the most productive author and institution were identified as Zheng Man and Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, respectively. While China had the highest number of publications, the United States held a greater prominence in this specific field. Collaboration among contributors was found to be weak. High-frequency keywords in the publications included "transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation," "electroacupuncture," "pain," and so forth. The literature with the highest citation count pertained to "Stimulation of the wrist acupuncture point PC6 for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting," while the article with the highest centrality was "Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." Several large clusters obtained from the references are also included "postoperative pain," "transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation". Nothing pertaining to mechanism study was found in the analysis results.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of acupuncture for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting has been gaining increasing recognition, although there remains room for improvement in the quality of research conducted in this area. Chinese authors and institutions have emerged as significant contributors to this field, while the United States has demonstrated greater proficiency in fostering collaborative efforts. It is imperative to enhance collaboration among these contributors. The current focal points of acupuncture for PONV encompass pain management, electroacupuncture, auricular acupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation. Additionally, TEA and enhanced recovery after surgery have been identified as the forefronts of research in this particular domain. In addition, there is still much room for research in the aspect of mechanism and insurance coverage. This study provides an in-depth perspective on acupuncture for PONV, which offers reference material for clinicians with rational choice of therapeutic scheme, educators with hot topics, and researchers with valuable research directions.

Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV.

Optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly gallstone patients with a high body mass index using enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation of elderly patients with a high body mass index (BMI) after cholecystectomy carries risks and requires the adoption of effective perioperative management strategies. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive treatment approach that facilitates early patient recovery and reduces postoperative complications.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of traditional perioperative management methods with the ERAS protocol in elderly patients with gallbladder stones and a high BMI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined data from 198 elderly patients with a high BMI who underwent cholecystectomy at the Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital from August 2019 to August 2022. Among them, 99 patients were managed using the traditional perioperative care approach (non-ERAS protocol), while the remaining 99 patients were managed using the ERAS protocol. Relevant indicator data were collected for patients preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The comparison results between the two groups of patients in terms of age, sex, BMI, underlying diseases, surgical type, and preoperative hospital stay showed no statistically significant differences. However, the ERAS group had a significantly shorter preoperative fasting time than the non-ERAS group (4.0 ± 0.9 h vs 7.6 ± 0.9 h). Regarding intraoperative indicators, there were no significant differences between the two groups of patients. However, in terms of postoperative recovery, the ERAS protocol group exhibited significant advantages over the non-ERAS group, including a shorter hospital stay, lower postoperative pain scores and postoperative hunger scores, and higher satisfaction levels. The readmission rate was lower in the ERAS protocol group than in the non-ERAS group (3.0% vs 8.1%), although the difference was not significant. Furthermore, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting severity, postoperative abdominal distention at 24 h, and daily life ability scores.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that the ERAS protocol confers significant advantages in postoperative outcomes following cholecystectomy, including reduced readmission rates, decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting, alleviated abdominal distension, and enhanced functional capacity. While the protocol may not exhibit significant improvement in early postoperative symptoms, it does exhibit advantages in long-term postoperative symptoms and recovery. These findings underscore the importance of implementing the ERAS protocol in the postoperative management of cholecystectomy patients, as it contributes to improving patients' recovery and quality of life while reducing health care resource utilization.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after artificial joint replacement surgery: comparison between remimazolam and sevoflurane, a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Remimazolam, a newly synthesized ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, has not been previously compared with sevoflurane with regard to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane among patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of patients who underwent artificial joint replacement surgery at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital from 2020 to 2022, with a focus on comparing the incidence of PONV among those who received sevoflurane versus remimazolam anesthesia. To control for confounding factors, we employed a propensity score-matching technique to pair patients who received sevoflurane anesthesia with those who received remimazolam anesthesia.

RESULTS

The records of 292 patients receiving general anesthesia for artificial joint replacement surgery were collected and categorized into group sevoflurane (n = 241) or group remimazolam (n = 51). Before propensity score matching, age and ASA-PS exhibited significant differences between two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between them (p = 0.461). After matching, there were 51 patients in each group. However, there is no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between the two matched cohorts (p = 0.243).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that there was no difference in the prevalence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

Gravid status is not associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting: a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and unpleasant complication of general anesthesia. There are well-known risk factors that predispose a patient to develop PONV. While studies exist that explore PONV incidence in gravid and non-gravid women separately, limited studies exist to compare the two cohorts to identify if pregnancy is associated with increased risk for PONV or differences in PONV prophylaxis and treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control cohort study, with 1:2 matching based on age, year of surgery, and surgical procedure. Electronic medical records were abstracted for demographic information, predisposing risk factors, prophylactic antiemetics, PONV documentation, rescue antiemetics, PACU stay, and length of hospitalization. Analyses of risk factors for PONV were performed using logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

237 gravid women who underwent non-obstetric procedures with general anesthesia were identified and matched with 474 non-gravid women. PONV complicated the course of 51 (21.5%) gravid and 72 (15.2%) non-gravid women. The number of prophylactic antiemetics was fewer among gravid (median 2 [1, 2]) than non-gravid (3 [2, 3]) women (P < 0.001). No association was found between gravid status and risk for PONV (adjusted odds ratio 1.35 [95%CI 0.84, 2.17], P = 0.222). Gravid women had longer hospital lengths of stay (P < 0.001), despite having shorter surgical duration (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for PONV is similar between gravid and similarly aged women. However, anesthesiologists administer fewer prophylactic antiemetics to gravid women during non-obstetric surgery.

Association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative nausea and vomiting: a retrospective analysis of 247 thyroidectomy cases

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are major complications after general anesthesia. Although various pathways are involved in triggering PONV, hypotension plays an important role. We hypothesized that intraoperative hypotension during general anesthesia might be responsible for the incidence of PONV.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent thyroidectomy. The initial blood pressure measured before induction of anesthesia was used as the baseline value. The systolic blood pressure measured during the operation from the start to the end of anesthesia was extracted from anesthetic records. The time integral value when the measured systolic blood pressure fell below the baseline value was calculated as area under the curve (AUC) of s100%.

RESULTS

There were 247 eligible cases. Eighty-eight patients (35.6%) had PONV. There was no difference in patient background between the patients with or without PONV. Univariate analysis showed that the total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (p=0.02), smoking history (p=0.02), and AUC-s100% (p=0.006) were significantly associated with PONV. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that TIVA (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29...0.99), smoking history (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37...0.96), and AUC-s100% (OR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.0...1.01) were significantly associated with PONV.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative hypotension evaluated by AUC-s100% was related to PONV in thyroidectomy.

Efficacy of electroacupuncture in preventing nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are regarded as a serious concern after thyroidectomy. Electroacupuncture shows the potential to reduce general anesthesia-related side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting that commonly occurs in patients after thyroidectomy.

METHODS

This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial with a two-arm, patient blind structure. Sixty-four participants were randomly assigned to the acupuncture (n = 35) or control (n = 29) group. Patients in the acupuncture group received electroacupuncture and intradermal press needles. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, pain severity, and postoperative in-hospital morbidity.

RESULTS

The total incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 40.6% (26/64). There was no difference in the incidence between the control (10/29, 34.5%) and acupuncture (16/35, 45.7%) groups (p = 0.362). The severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between the groups (p = 0.842). Length of hospitalization and postoperative complications were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized controlled trial, electroacupuncture treatment after thyroidectomy is safe and comparable to conventional anti-emetic therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0001782. Registered on 26 January 2016.

Electropress Needle Stimulation for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Being overweight or obese is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide and seriously endangers human health. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been successfully used for the treatment of severe obesity, but the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is high. However, traditional antiemetics have limited effects on PONV. Electropress needle therapy, which can be enhanced with electrical stimulation, is a promising therapy for the prevention and treatment of PONV. However, whether the electropress needle is effective for PONV in patients with LSG remains uncertain.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients who planned to undergo elective LSG between October 2021 and July 2022 were randomly allocated to receive electropress needle stimulation combined with dexamethasone and granisetron (group A) or dexamethasone plus granisetron (group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were PONV severity score, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative remedial medication use.

RESULTS

Compared with dexamethasone plus granisetron, electropress needle stimulation combined with dexamethasone and granisetron significantly decreased the incidence and severity of PONV (P<0.001). Patients in Group A consumed less antiemetics postoperatively (P<0.05) and had a much shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). There was no difference in the time to first flatus between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Electropress needle acupoint stimulation can reduce the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing LSG.

Dexamethasone administration to improve patient recovery in ambulatory vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized prospective trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Dexamethasone is a potent glucocorticoid that may improve quality of recovery (QoR). We hypothesized that standard administration of dexamethasone at induction may improve QoR compared to placebo in subjects undergoing ambulatory vaginal reconstructive surgeries.

METHODS

This was a randomized prospective clinical trial on subjects scheduled for ambulatory vaginal reconstructive surgery for prolapse and/or urinary incontinence. Intervention arm subjects were administered dexamethasone and the control group, a placebo (normal saline). Timing of administration, anesthesia medications, postoperative pain medications, and antiemetics were standardized. Primary outcome was difference in QoR (QoR-40) scores 24-48 h after surgery. Power analysis estimated that 27 subjects were required in each group to detect a difference in QoR-40 scores with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Fifty-one subjects were enrolled and randomized. 4 withdrew, 1 was excluded, and 46 were analyzed. For the primary outcome, there was no difference in the QoR-40 between the dexamethasone and placebo group (--13.5 vs -19.6, p=0.24). Postoperative nausea vomiting intensity scores were not different (8.33 vs 9.09, p=1). Pain scores were similar in the two groups (6.0 vs 4.7, p=0.12). Although not statistically significant, surgical satisfaction at 6 weeks was better with dexamethasone (23.5 vs 26.9, p=0.09).

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, a single dose of dexamethasone at the time of induction prior to ambulatory vaginal reconstructive surgery was not associated with improved QoR. Standardized anesthesia protocols may play a role in postoperative nausea, pain control, and thereby QoR in patients undergoing ambulatory vaginal reconstructive surgeries.

Effects of opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after treatments of lower extremity wounds: protocol for a randomized double-blind crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common after general anesthesia and surgery. This study aims to compare the effects of total intravenous opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) with conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on PONV in patients following treatments for wounds of lower extremities.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, crossover trial will include a total of 72 adult patients scheduled for at least two separate surgical treatments of lower extremity wounds under general anesthesia. Patients will be randomized to 1 of 2 anesthesia sequences of OFA and OBA. Patients in sequence 1 will receive OFA in the first treatment procedure and OBA in the second procedure, while patients in sequence 2 will receive the two anesthesia regimens in the reverse order. The washout period is at least 5 days. OFA will be delivered with intravenous esketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, and propofol. OBA will be delivered with intravenous sufentanil and propofol. The primary endpoint is the incidence of PONV within the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary endpoints are the severity of PONV, antiemetic rescue therapy, postoperative pain scores, the worst pain, need for rescue analgesia, postoperative sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, tachycardia, hypoxemia, psychotomimetic or dissociative effects, time to extubation, and length of postanesthesia care unit stay. Patients who complete two surgical procedures with designated anesthesia regimens will be included in the final analyses.

DISCUSSION

This crossover trial will determine whether total intravenous OFA reduces PONV in patients following treatments for lower extremity wounds. The results of this trial will also represent an important step to understand the benefits and possible risks of OFA in surgical patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061511).

Remimazolam-remifentanil causes less postoperative nausea and vomiting than remimazolam-alfentanil during hysteroscopy: a single-centre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although the operation time of hysteroscopy is short, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting is high. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in hysteroscopy when remimazolam is combined with remifentanil or alfentanil.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Patients undergoing hysteroscopy were recruited and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam-remifentanil (Group RR) or the remimazolam-alfentanil group (Group RA). All patients in the two groups were started with an induction dose of remimazolam besylate 0.2 mg/kg and then maintained with a dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/h. After induction with remimazolam besylate, in Group RR, remifentanil was infused using a target-controlled infusion system with a target concentration of 1.5 ng/ml and titrated throughout the procedure. In Group RA, infusion of alfentanil was started with an initial bolus dose of 20 µg/kg over 30 s and then maintained at an initial rate of 0.16 µg/kg/min. The primary observation outcome was the incidence rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The secondary observation outcomes were the time to awakening, the length of stay in the PACU, the total remimazolam dose and adverse effects, such as low SpO₂, bradycardia, hypotension and body movement.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were successfully included in this study. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in Group RR (2/102, 2.0%) was significantly lower than that in Group RA (12/102, 11.8%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, such as low SpO₂, bradycardia, hypotension and body movement, between Groups RR and RA (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam-remifentanil causes less postoperative nausea and vomiting than remimazolam-alfentanil in hysteroscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100044177. Full date of the first registration: 12/03/2021.

Opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine for improved postoperative recovery in hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anesthesia with opioids negatively affects patients' quality of recovery. Opioid-free anesthesia attempts to avoid these effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the quality of recovery, using lidocaine on patients undergoing hysteroscopy.

METHODS

A parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in Yichang Central Peoples' Hospital, Hubei Province, China, from January to April, 2022. We included 90 female patients (age: 18-65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I-II) scheduled for elective hysteroscopy, 45 of whom received lidocaine (Group L), and 45 received sufentanil (Group S). Patients were randomly allocated to receive either lidocaine or sufentanil perioperatively. The primary outcome was the quality of postoperative recovery, which was assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire (a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the quality of recovery after surgery).

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in age, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, height, weight, body mass index, and surgical duration. The QoR scores were significantly higher in Group L than Group S. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the time to extubation were significantly lower in Group L than Group S.

CONCLUSION

Opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine achieves a better quality of recovery, faster recovery, and a shorter time to extubation than general anesthesia with sufentanil.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered on January 15, 2022 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=149386 ), registration number ChiCTR2200055623.(15/01/2022).

External validation of postoperative nausea and vomiting risk scores in patients with liver cancer: A single-centre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to test the external validity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) risk assessment tools in patients undergoing hepatectomy, and to guide healthcare professionals' assessment of postoperative patients.

BACKGROUND

The identification of PONV risk is particularly important in the context of prevention. However, the predictive performance of the current PONV risk scores has not been confirmed in patients with liver cancer, and its applicability is still unknown. These uncertainties pose difficulties in performing routine risk assessment of PONV for patients with liver cancer in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with liver cancer and undergoing hepatectomy were prospectively consecutively recruited. All enrolled patients received PONV assessments and PONV risk assessments via the Apfel risk score and the Koivuranta risk score. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) and calibration curves were used to assess the external validity. This study was reported according to the TRIPOD Checklist.

RESULTS

Among 214 PONV-assessed patients, 114 patients (53.3%) developed PONV. For the Apfel simplified risk score, the ROC area was 0.612 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.543-0.678) in the validation dataset, which demonstrated imperfect discrimination; the calibration curve showed poor calibration with a slope of 0.49. For the Koivuranta score, the ROC area was 0.628 (CI: 0.559-0.693) in the validation dataset, which showed limited discrimination; the calibration curve indicated an unsatisfactory calibration with a slope of 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

The Apfel risk score and the Koivuranta risk score were not well validated in our study and disease-specific risk factors should be taken into account when updating or developing PONV risk stratification instruments.

Use of sugammadex is associated with reduced incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a post-hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common but troublesome complication in patients who undergo laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Whether sugammadex use is related to the persistent decrease in the occurrence of PONV during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which is critical for the rehabilitation of patients after LBS, remains unknown.

METHODS

The study was based on a randomized controlled trial conducted in an accredited bariatric centre. A total of 205 patients who underwent LBS were included in the analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model were used to identify the significant variables related to PONV. Then propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to compare outcomes between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h after LBS. The secondary endpoints included the severity of PONV, time to first flatus, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, and water intake.

RESULTS

The incidence of PONV was 43.4% (89/205) within the first 48 h after LBS. In multivariable analysis, sugammadex use (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.09, P < 0.001) was an independent protective factor of PONV. After IPTW adjustment, sugammadex use was associated with lower incidence of PONV (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48-0.61, P < 0.001), postoperative nausea (PON) (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, P < 0.001), and postoperative vomiting (POV) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.68, P < 0.001) within postoperative 48 h. The severity of PON as well as the incidence and severity of POV within the first 24 h were also lower in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05). Reduced need for rescue antiemetic therapy within the first 24 h, increased water intake for both periods, and earlier first passage of flatus were observed in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex can reduce the incidence and severity of PONV, increase postoperative water intake, and shorten the time to first flatus in bariatric patients during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which may play a pivotal role in enhanced recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: October 25, 2021).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Postoperative Nausea and Length of Stay in Mastectomy Patients With Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is a mainstay of curative breast cancer treatment and is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) negatively impacting the patient experience. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are a combination of evidence-based strategies applied to traditional perioperative practices with the goal to reduce postoperative complications. ERAS protocols have been traditionally underutilized in breast surgery. We investigated if the implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with decreased rates of PONV as well as length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review case-control study in which we compared PONV and LOS between ERAS cases and non-ERAS controls. Our data set consisted of 138 ERAS cases and 96 non-ERAS controls. All patients were >18 y old and underwent mastectomy with immediate implant or tissue expander-based reconstruction between 2018 and 2020. The non-ERAS group consisted of procedure-matched controls that were treated prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol.

RESULTS

In univariate comparisons, patients who underwent the ERAS protocol had significantly decreased postoperative nausea (mean 37.5% of controls versus 18.1% of ERAS, P < 0.001) and shorter LOS (1.21 versus 1.49 d, P < 0.001). Using a multivariable regression to control for potential confounders, ERAS protocol was associated with less postoperative nausea (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.5), LOS 1 d versus > 1 d (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.1-0.35), and less postoperative ondansetron use (OR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.01-0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that implementation of the ERAS protocol in women undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is associated with improved patient outcomes in postoperative nausea and LOS.

Penehyclidine hydrochloride for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication of laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Penehyclidine hydrochloride has been reported to be effective in preventing PONV. Considering the potential preventive effects of penehyclidine against PONV, we hypothesized that intravenous infusion of penehyclidine may alleviate PONV within the first 48 h in patients scheduled for LBS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LBS were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive saline (Control group, n = 113) or a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine 0.5 mg (PHC group, n = 221). The primary outcome was incidence of PONV within the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included severity of PONV, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, volume of water intake, and time to first flatus.

RESULTS

PONV occurred in 159 (48%) patients within the first 48 h postoperatively, including 51% in the Control group and 46% in the PHC group. There was no significant difference in the incidence or severity of PONV between the two groups (P > 0.05). Within the first 24 h and 24-48 h, no significant difference was found in incidence or severity of PONV, postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, or volume of water intake (P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that penehyclidine was significantly associated with a prolonged time to first flatus (median onset time: 22 h vs. 21 h, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Penehyclidine did not decrease incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing LBS. However, a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine (0.5 mg) was associated with a slightly prolonged time to first flatus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: 25/10/2021).

ST36 acupoint injection with anisodamine for postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients after bariatric surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The use of multimodal pharmacological prophylactic regimes has decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in general but it still occurs in over 60% of female patients after bariatric surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ST36 acupoint injection with anisodamine in prevention of PONV among female patients after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were randomly allocated to anisodamine or control group at the ratio of 2:1. Anisodamine or normal saline was injected into Zusanli (ST36) bilaterally after induction of general anesthesia. The incidence and severity of PONV were assessed during the first 3 postoperative days and at 3 months. The quality of early recovery of anesthesia, gastrointestinal function, sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline and perioperative characteristics were comparable between two groups. In the anisodamine group, 25 patients (42.4%) experienced vomiting within postoperative 24 h compared with 21 (72.4%) in the control group (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.85). Time to first rescue antiemetic was 6.5 h in anisodamine group, and 1.7 h in the control group (P = 0.011). Less rescue antiemetic was required during the first 24 h in the anisodamine group (P = 0.024). There were no differences in either postoperative nausea or other recovery characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ST36 acupoint injection with anisodamine significantly reduced postoperative vomiting without affecting nausea in female patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Comparison of postoperative nausea and vomiting between Remimazolam and Propofol in Patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery: a prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a recently approved, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. However, few studies have investigated remimazolam in relation to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on PONV in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery.

METHODS

Patients (n = 206) aged 19-65 years who were scheduled for oral and maxillofacial surgery were randomized into two groups, the remimazolam (R) and propofol group (P). In the R group (n = 94), remimazolam was used to induce anesthesia at 12 mg/kg/h and to maintain anesthesia at 1-2 mg/kg/h. In the P group (n = 95), anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol (target effect-site concentration: 3-5 µg/ml). In both groups, remifentanil was administered at a target effect-site concentration of 2.5-4 ng/ml. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of PONV during the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the severity of nausea, use of rescue antiemetics, severity of postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, and quality of recovery.

RESULTS

The incidence of PONV during the first 24 h after surgery was 11.7% and 10.5% in the R group and P group, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the severity of nausea (P > 0.05). Ten patients in the R group and ten patients in the P group required rescue antiemetics during the first 24 h after surgery (P = 0.98). No inter-group differences were observed in terms of postoperative pain score, use of rescue analgesia, and quality of recovery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, remimazolam did not increase the incidence and severity of PONV compared with propofol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0006965, Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea. Registration date: 26/01/2022.

Implementing novel modalities into an institutional enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) protocol

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathways are associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This study aims to assess efficacy and safety of three novel protocol contributions (transversus abdominis plane blocks, ketamine and fosaprepitant), as well as their impact on length of stay (LOS) and on postoperative complications.

METHODS

Effectiveness and safety were retrospectively investigated in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) over a 6-year period in a single institution. Group 1 patients were not exposed to any of our suggested interventions, whereas Group 2 were exposed to all of three.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and August 2021, 1480 patients underwent primary SG (77.6%) or RYGB (22.4%); of those, 1132 (76.5%) and 348 (23.5%) were in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean BMI and age were 45.87 versus 43.65 kg/m² and 45.53 versus 44.99 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Suggested interventions were associated with lower operative times (84.79 ± 24.21 vs. 80.78 ± 32.8 min, p = 0.025). In Group 2, the mean LOS decreased in 0.18 day (1.79 ± 1.04 vs. 1.60 ± 0.90; p = 0.004). Overall complication rates were 8% and 8.6% for groups 1 and 2, respectively; readmission rates were 5.7% (64 pts) vs. 7.2% (25 pts), p > 0.05. Reoperations were less prevalent in Group 2 (1.5% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

Focus on optimized pain management, allied to a superior PONV control, may be relevant contributors for a lower LOS without negative impacts in complications rates.

The effect of preoperative scopolamine patch use on postoperative urinary retention in urogynecologic surgeries

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study aims to determine whether the use of preoperative transdermal scopolamine is associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention in urogynecologic surgeries.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review study of women who underwent surgery between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Patients who received a scopolamine patch versus those who did not were compared using demographic and perioperative variables utilizing Pearson's chi-squared test and t-test of Wilcoxon rank-sum. A logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effect of scopolamine on the patients' postoperative voiding trial results, controlling for confounders. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 449 women underwent a vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, midurethral sling placement, uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament suspension, sacrocolpopexy, anterior/posterior colporrhaphy, or other urogynecologic surgeries with 109 (24.2%) having received transdermal scopolamine. A significantly higher number of women with preoperative scopolamine [n = 50 (45.9%)] failed their voiding trial compared to those without scopolamine [n = 100 (29.4%), p = 0.0016]. The adjusted model yielded an odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.08-2.85) of a failed voiding trial in the scopolamine group. When comparing the odds of failing voiding trial by surgery type, those with a midurethral sling placed during surgery had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.12 (95% CI: 2.01-4.87), as compared to those without a midurethral sling.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a transdermal scopolamine patch for nausea and vomiting prophylaxis is associated with increased risk of postoperative urinary retention across all urogynecologic surgeries.

CYP2D6 isoenzyme and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative nausea and vomiting is still a common complication. Serotonin receptor antagonists are commonly used in clinical practice for antiemetic prophylaxis. Interindividual variations in drug response, including single nucleotide polymorphisms, are related to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in these drugs and may lead to a poor therapeutic response. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of CYP2D6 isoenzyme and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms on the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting with the use of ondansetron or palonosetron.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial including 82 women aged 60 years or over undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive either ondansetron or palonosetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. DNA was extracted from saliva. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The following polymorphisms were analyzed: rs3892097 C/T, rs1128503 A/G, rs16947 A/G, rs1065852 A/G, rs1045642 A/G, rs2032582 C/A, and rs20325821 C/A.

RESULTS

Overall, vomiting, and severe nausea occurred in 22.5% and 57.5% of patients, respectively. In the palonosetron group, patients with the GG genotype (rs16947 A/G) experienced more severe nausea (p = 0.043). In the ondansetron group, patients with the AA genotype (rs16947 A/G) presented mild nausea (p = 0.034), and those with the AA genotype (rs1065852 A/G) experienced more vomiting (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

A low antiemetic response was observed with ondansetron in the presence of the AA genotype (rs16947 A/G) and the AA genotype (rs1065852 A/G), and a low therapeutic response was found with palonosetron in the presence of the GG genotype (rs16947 A/G) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

REGISTER

ClinicalTrials.gov.

Esketamine-based opioid-free anaesthesia alleviates postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

Although opioids are commonly prescribed in clinical anaesthesia, the significant side effects attributed to their overuse are raising increasing concerns. One way to reduce perioperative opioid consumption is to apply opioid-reduced anaesthesia (ORA) and even opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA), which involves regional techniques, neuraxial anaesthesia, nonopioid analgesics or combined use. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the application of OFA by using esketamine in intraoperative analgesia could minimize the side effects of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), as well as other short-term side effects related to anaesthesia.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 278 patients were enrolled; participants were nonsmoking female patients aged 18-50 years and scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy, ASA at I-III, with no serious physical or mental diseases. Both groups received usual perioperative care except for the analgesic medication of either esketamine or sufentanil. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included recovery status, pain, sedation level and overall recovery, delirium and cognition, anxiety and depression and total consumption of analgesic agents.

DISCUSSION

This trial may show that the synergy of esketamine and propofol anaesthesia reduces PONV as well as other short-term adverse events, thereby providing a better safety and satisfaction profile of ERAS for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100047169. Registered on June 9, 2021.

Risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting following ambulatory surgery: A retrospective case-control study

Objective

To explore potential risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following ambulatory surgery.

Method

Clinical data of 1670 cases receiving ambulatory surgery in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from September 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. They were categorized to PONV group and non-PONV group, and perioperative data in both groups were analyzed for assessing risk factors of PONV following ambulatory laparoscopy.

Results

There were 156/1,670 (9.3%) PONV cases, and the female and male incidence in recruited cases was 12.0% and 6.0%, respectively. Analyses on perioperative data of them identified that female gender [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.060, P < 0.001], operation time >1 h (aOR = 1.554, P = 0.011), postoperative pain at rest (aOR = 1.909, P = 0.013) and postoperative pain during activities (aOR = 3.512, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of PONV following ambulatory surgery. Furthermore, postoperative pain at rest and during activities were linearly, positively correlated to the incidence of PONV.

Conclusion

Female gender, operation time >1 h and postoperative pain are closely related with the incidence of PONV following ambulatory surgery. Alleviating postoperative pain properly is one of the methods to reduce risk factors of PONV following ambulatory surgery.

Evaluation of penehyclidine for prevention of post operative nausea and vomitting in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy under total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol-remifentanil

Backgroud

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common complications after total thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has been documented to prevent PONV in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. Penehyclidine, an anticholinergic agent with an elimination half-life of over 10 h, is widely used as premedication to reduce glandular secretion. This study aimed to explore the preventative effects of penehyclidine with propofol-remifentanil-TIVA to single-TIVA on PONV in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy.

Methods

A total of 100 patients scheduled for total thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to either the penehyclidine group (n = 50) or TIVA group (n = 50). Propofol and remifentanil were was used for TIVA in all patients. No patients who received premedication. Patients were administrated with either 5 ml of normal saline or 0.5 mg of penehyclidine soon after anesthesia induction. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, the severity of nausea, the requirement of rescue antiemetics, and adverse effects were investigated during the first 24 h in two time periods (0–2 h and 2–24 h).

Results

The overall PONV incidence during the 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the penehyclidine group compared with the TIVA group (12% vs 36%, P < 0.005). Besides, the incidence of nausea and the incidence of vomiting were significantly lower in the penehyclidine group compared with the TIVA group at 2–24 h after surgery. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups at 0–2 h after surgery.

Conclusions

Administration of penehyclidine under TIVA with propofol-remifentanil is more effective for prevention of PONV than TIVA alone, especially 2–24 h after total thyroidectomy.

Trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=132463&htm=4 (Ref: ChiCTR2100050278, the full date of first registration: 25/08/2021).

The effect of newly designed dual-channel elastomeric pump for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study

BACKGROUND

A newly designed intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device with a dual-channel elastomeric infusion pump has been recently introduced. One channel is a continuous line with a constant flow rate basal infusion, while the other channel has an adjustable flow rate and bolus function and is labeled as a selector-bolus channel. This study compared dual and single-channel intravenous PCA in terms of clinical effect and quality of recovery.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly allocated to a 1-channel group (n = 41) or a 2-channel group (n = 43). Only the selector-bolus channel was utilized, but the continuous channel was not utilized in the 1-channel group, but both channels were utilized in the 2-channel group. In the 1-channel group, 16 μg/kg of fentanyl, 2 mg/kg of ketorolac, and 12 mg of ondansetron with normal saline were administered to the selector-bolus channel and normal saline only in the continuous channel for blinding. In the 2-channel group, 16 μg/kg of fentanyl was administered to the selector-bolus channel, and ketorolac (2 mg/kg) and ondansetron (12 mg) were administered via the continuous channel. The quality of recovery was evaluated preoperatively and 24 h postoperatively using the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40). Cumulative PCA consumption, postoperative pain rated using the numeric rating scale (NRS; during rest/cough), and postoperative nausea were evaluated 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after surgery. Incidence of vomiting and use of antiemetics and rescue analgesics was measured.

RESULTS

The 24-h postoperative QoR-40 score was higher in the 2-channel group than in the 1-channel group (P=0.031). The incidence of nausea at 12 h and 36 h was significantly higher in the 1-channel group (P=0.043 and 0.040, respectively), and antiemetic use was more frequent in the 1-channel group (P=0.049). Patient satisfaction was higher in the 2-channel group (P=0.036). No significant differences were observed in pain scores during resting/cough or cumulative PCA consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-channel PCA showed better patient satisfaction with higher QoR-40 during the recovery compared with the 1-channel PCA. Better satisfaction was associated with lower nausea and reduced rescue antiemetics by maintaining the infusion of adjuvant analgesic agents and antiemetic agents constantly by utilizing dual channels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04082039 on 9 September 2019.

Effect of ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preventive effect of preoperative administration of ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients receiving breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data from 225 patients who received modified radical mastectomy from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into an ondansetron group and a control group according to whether they received preoperative ondansetron or not. The incidence of PONV, visual analog scale (VAS) score, the rescue analgesics use and rescue antiemetic use, as well as the patient satisfaction degree about their PONV were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The ondansetron group showed lower total incidence of PONV, lower VAS score at 6 h post-operation as well as less rescue antiemetic use than the control group (P<0.05). Patients in the ondansetron group were more satisfied with their PONV condition than those in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative administration of ondansetron can prevent PONV and relieve pain 2-24 hours after breast cancer surgery.

Effect of the preoperative physical status on postoperative nausea and vomiting risk: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System is commonly used for preoperative assessment. Patient physical status before surgery can play an important role in postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, the relationship between the physical status classification and postoperative nausea and vomiting has not been well defined.

METHODS

Adults aged ≥ 18 years who underwent procedures under anesthesia between 2015 and 2020 were included in the study. We analyzed the relationship of postoperative nausea and vomiting with physical status classification score using propensity score matching and Cox hazard regression. Differences in intraoperative use of vasopressor and inotropes and invasive monitoring were investigated according to the classification.

RESULTS

A total of 163,500 patients were included in the study. After matching, classification 1 versus 2 included 43,400 patients; 1 versus ≤ 3, 13,287 patients; 2 versus ≤ 3, 23,530 patients (absolute standardized difference, 0-0.06). Patients with physical status classification ≤ 3 had a significantly lower postoperative nausea and vomiting risk than those with classification 1-2 (physical status classification 1 vs. ≤ 3, hazard ratio 0.76 [0.71-0.82], P < 0.001; 2 versus ≤ 3, hazard ratio 0.86 [0.82-0.91], P < 0.001). Intraoperative use of vasopressor or inotrope and invasive monitoring were noted more in the high physical status classification than the low physical status classification (absolute standardized difference [0.19-1.25]).

CONCLUSION

There were differences in intraoperative invasive monitoring and use of vasopressor or inotrope among the classifications, and a score of 3 or higher reduced the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting more than a score of 1-2.

The Impact of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Patients with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven effective in improving postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients with obesity, but its effect on prevention of PONV remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of GDFT on PONV in high-risk patients with LSG.

METHODS

In a randomized, single-blinded, two-arm trial, patients with an Apfel score ≥ 3 and scheduled for LSG were included. Patients in the GDFT group received stroke volume-guided fluid therapy. Patients in the control group received conventional fluid therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h after LSG. The second outcome included intensity of PONV, use of rescue therapy, recovery of gastrointestinal function, and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were analyzed. The incidence of PONV in the GDFT group was lower than that in the control group (47.1% vs. 71.6%; odds ratio [95%CI], 0.35 [0.17-0.72]; P = 0.004). Fewer patients in the GDFT group received rescue therapy (30% vs. 58.2%; P = 0.001). Patients following GDFT protocol had a faster return of flatus (27.5 (19, 31) vs. 31 (20, 48) hours, P = 0.037) and shorter postoperative LOS (6.1 ± 1.0 vs. 6.6 ± 1.1 days; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

GDFT is conducive to deceasing PONV occurrence, restoring intestinal function, and shortening postoperative LOS in high-risk patients undergoing LSG.

Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting risk in the second stage during bilateral total knee arthroplasty with a 1-week interval

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often performed sequentially on both sides during a single hospital stay. Patients who experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after the first operation are concerned about PONV recurrence after the second operation. However, there are few studies regarding the incidence of PONV in staged bilateral TKA with a ≥ 1-week interval. This study aimed to identify the differences in (1) PONV incidence, (2) use of rescue antiemetics, and (3) the amount of opioid consumption between the first and second operations for staged bilateral TKA with a 1-week interval. Based on our anecdotal experience, the hypothesis of this study was that during staged bilateral TKA at a 1-week interval, the PONV incidence and rescue antiemetic requirement after the second operation will be lower than those after the first operation, regardless of opioid consumption.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent staged bilateral TKA with a 1-week interval were retrospectively reviewed. All second-stage operations were performed with the same anaesthesia protocol and perioperative patient management protocol as the first-stage operation. PONV incidence was the primary outcome. The requirement for rescue antiemetic drugs and the amount of opioid consumption were secondary outcome variables. The outcome variables were recorded during three postoperative days (Days 0-2) for each stage and were compared between the first and second operations.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting on Day 0 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively) and nausea on Day 1 (p = 0.008) were significantly lower after the second operation. Rescue antiemetic use on Day 0 was significantly lower after the second operation (p = 0.001). The total opioid consumption 72 h after surgery was significantly higher after the second operation (61.76 vs. 34.28 mg, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

During staged bilateral TKA with a 1-week interval, PONV incidence was lower after the second operation, even with increased opioid consumption.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.