The use of steroid-sparing agents in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

CD80 Insights as Therapeutic Target in the Current and Future Treatment Options of Frequent-Relapse Minimal Change Disease

Minimal change disease (MCD) is the most common cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, and it is well known for its multifactorial causes which are the manifestation of the disease. Proteinuria is an early consequence of podocyte injury and a typical sign of kidney disease. Steroid-sensitive patients react well with glucocorticoids, but there is a high chance of multiple relapses. CD80, also known as B7-1, is generally expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in steroid-sensitive MCD patients. Various glomerular disease models associated with proteinuria demonstrated that the detection of CD80 with the increase of urinary CD80 was strongly associated closely with frequent-relapse MCD patients. The role of CD80 in MCD became controversial because one contradicts finding. This review covers the treatment alternatives for MCD with the insight of CD80 as a potential therapeutic target. The promising effectiveness of CD20 (rituximab) antibody and CD80 inhibitor (abatacept) encourages further investigation of CD80 as a therapeutic target in frequent-relapse MCD patients. Therapeutic-based antibody towards CD80 (galiximab) had never been investigated in MCD or any kidney-related disease; hence, the role of CD80 is still undetermined. A new therapeutic approach towards MCD is essential to provide broader effective treatment options besides the general immunosuppressive agents with gruesome adverse effects.

Randomized clinical trial to compare efficacy and safety of repeated courses of rituximab to single-course rituximab followed by maintenance mycophenolate-mofetil in children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome

Background

Approximately 30% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome develop a complicated course with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is a safe and effective alternative to steroids or other immunosuppressants for achieving and maintaining remission in this population at short term. Despite the good initial response relapses inevitably occur after regeneration of B lymphocytes, necessitating either repeat courses of rituximab or addition of another steroid-sparing immunosuppressant.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, two-parallel-arm randomized controlled phase III study among children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome who are maintained in remission with oral steroids. One hundred children will be randomized to either Rituximab and maintenance Mycophenolate mofetil (A) or repeated courses of prophylactic Rituximab only (B). In arm A, mycophenolate mofetil (1200 mg/m² per day) will be started 3 months after Rituximab administration. In arm B, Rituximab infusions will be administered at 0, 8 and 16 months if B cell count normalize at the given time points. Prednisolone will be discontinued in both groups 2 weeks following first course of rituximab. Primary aim is to evaluate the difference in 24-month relapse-free survival. Main secondary endpoints are cumulative prednisolone dose, frequency of relapses and changes in anthropometry. Circulating B lymphocyte populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of rituximab responsiveness and adverse events will be analysed.

Discussion

The study will provide evidence as to the comparative safety and efficacy of two alternative steroid-sparing therapeutic options in children suffering from steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. The two-year study design will address the long-term results obtained with the alternative treatment protocols.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered to the Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03899103 dated 02/04/2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/) and Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/04/018517 dated 09/04/2019).

A randomized clinical trial indicates that levamisole increases the time to relapse in children with steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Levamisole has been considered the least toxic and least expensive steroid-sparing drug for preventing relapses of steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (SSINS). However, evidence for this is limited as previous randomized clinical trials were found to have methodological limitations. Therefore, we conducted an international multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to reassess its usefulness in prevention of relapses in children with SSINS. The efficacy and safety of one year of levamisole treatment in children with SSINS and frequent relapses were evaluated. The primary analysis cohort consisted of 99 patients from 6 countries. Between 100 days and 12 months after the start of study medication, the time to relapse (primary endpoint) was significantly increased in the levamisole compared to the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.22 [95% confidence interval 0.11-0.43]). Significantly, after 12 months of treatment, six percent of placebo patients versus 26 percent of levamisole patients were still in remission. During this period, the most frequent serious adverse event (four of 50 patients) possibly related to levamisole was asymptomatic moderate neutropenia, which was reversible spontaneously or after treatment discontinuation. Thus, in children with SSINS and frequent relapses, levamisole prolonged the time to relapse and also prevented recurrence during one year of treatment compared to prednisone alone. However, regular blood controls are necessary for safety issues.

Short courses of daily prednisolone during upper respiratory tract infections reduce relapse frequency in childhood nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Relapses of childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS) are frequently precipitated by viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). A review of the literature reveals that in patients with steroid-dependent NS on alternate day corticosteroids, a short course of daily corticosteroid therapy during the course of an URTI may reduce relapse frequency.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of a short course of low-dose corticosteroid therapy during the course of an URTI on relapse frequency in patients with steroid-sensitive NS who have not been taking any treatment for a minimum period of 3 months.

METHODS

A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial was conducted on 48 patients with idiopathic NS who had not been receiving corticosteroid therapy for a minimum of 3 months. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A received 5 days of daily prednisolone at 0.5 mg/kg at the onset of an URTI while group B received 5 days of placebo. Both groups were followed up for 1 year and the URTI-induced relapse frequency was noted. A crossover was performed during the next year, with group A receiving placebo and group B receiving prednisolone.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients completed the study. In the treatment group, 115 episodes of URTI led to 11 relapses while in the control group 101 episodes of URTI led to 25 relapses. There was no significant difference between the mean number of URTIs between the treatment and control groups. The treatment group had significantly less relapses compared to the control group (p = 0.014). Within the treatment group, 65.6% did not relapse, while the remainder had a single relapse. In contrast, only 40.6% of the control group remained in remission while 40.6% suffered a single relapse and 18.8% had two or more relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing a short course of daily corticosteroids during an URTI significantly reduces the frequency of URTI-induced relapse in patients with steroid-responsive NS who are off corticosteroid therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Combination ACTHar Gel and Tacrolimus in Treatment-Resistant Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis and Membranous Glomerulopathy

Introduction

H.P. ACTHar gel is a preparation of melanocortin peptides that has been used to treat resistant forms of nephrotic syndrome. To determine whether combination therapy with ACTHar gel and tacrolimus reduces proteinuria and stabilizes renal function, we conducted a prospective, open-label trial in patients with treatment-resistant membranous glomerulopathy (MGN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

Methods

Nine patients with treatment-resistant MGN and 13 with treatment-resistant FSGS received subcutaneous ACTHar gel for 6 months. Patients with no response or a partial response to ACTHar gel alone received an additional 6 months of therapy with combination ACTHar gel and oral tacrolimus. The study endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving a complete or partial remission after 6 months of combination therapy.

Results

Among patients with MGN, treatment with ACTHar gel alone achieved a partial remission in 44% and no response in 56% of patients. No patient achieved a complete response with ACTHar gel therapy alone. An additional 6 months of combination therapy with ACTHar gel and tacrolimus resulted in partial and complete response rates of 25% and 75%, respectively. Among patients with FSGS, ACTHar gel therapy alone resulted in complete and partial response rate of 7.7% and 62.0%. Combination therapy increased complete response rates to 17% and partial responses to 66%. Proteinuria (urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio) was significantly reduced in both patients with MGN and those with FSGS after 6 months of ACTHar gel alone and was further reduced among the patients with MGN with the addition of tacrolimus. There were no significant changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate during the treatment phase or long-term follow-up.

Discussion

Combination therapy with ACTHar gel and tacrolimus was well tolerated by patients with treatment-resistant MGN and FSGS and significantly reduced proteinuria and improved clinical response rates compared with ACTHar gel alone.

Mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prospective studies have established the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) efficiency in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) but reports on the long-term outcome are lacking. Moreover, the search for factors influencing its efficiency would be useful to define its place among the other treatments.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective study including 96 children with steroid-dependent INS followed for 4.7 years (median) (IQ 3-6) after the onset of MMF treatment. The characteristics of responder patients (n = 74), as defined by a 50 % decrease of relapse rate and/or a 60 % decrease of steroid dose, and of non-responder patients (n = 22) were compared by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Withdrawal of prednisone was achieved in 48/96 patients after a median duration of 18.1 months (IQ 7.8-30.0) of MMF. Only 26/48 patients did not relapse under MMF alone. After MMF was stopped in these patients, only six remained in remission without any treatment at last follow-up. Responders had a shorter time to remission at the first flare (9.5 vs. 15 days, p = 0.02), a shorter disease duration prior to the onset of MMF (22.2 vs. 94.5 months, p = 0.001), and were younger at the MMF initiation (6.7 vs. 10.1 years, p = 0.02) than non-responder patients. The age of MMF initiation was an independent factor associated with efficiency (OR = 0.80, 95 % CI [0.69, 0.93], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF is more efficient in young patients treated early in the disease course. Nevertheless, MMF has no remnant effect while nearly all patients relapsed after withdrawal of the drug.

Population pharmacokinetics of levamisole in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

AIM

The aim was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of levamisole in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

Non-linear mixed effects modelling was performed on samples collected during a randomized controlled trial. Samples were collected from children who were receiving 2.5 mg kg(-1) levamisole (or placebo) orally once every other day. One hundred and thirty-six plasma samples were collected from 38 children from India and Europe and included in the analysis. A one compartment model described the data well.

RESULTS

The apparent clearance rate (CL/F) and distribution volume (V/F) were 44 l h(-1) 70 kg(-1) and 236 l 70 kg(-1) , respectively; estimated interindividual variability was 32-42%. In addition to allometric scaling of CL/F and V/F to body weight, we identified a significant proportional effect of age on CL/F (-10.1% per year). The pharmacokinetics parameters were not affected by gender, tablet strength or study centre. The median (interquartile range) maximum plasma concentration of levamisole was 438.3 (316.5-621.8) ng ml(-1) , and the median area under the concentration-time curve was 2847 (2267-3761) ng ml(-1) h. Median tmax and t½ values were 1.65 (1.32-2.0) h and 2.60 (2.06-3.65) h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we present the first pharmacokinetic data regarding levamisole in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. The pharmacokinetic profile of levamisole in children was similar to findings reported in adults, although the elimination rate was slightly higher in children.

Clinical course and outcome of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

We conducted a retrospective study on children with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) to evaluate the clinical course and outcome of children with steroid-sensitive NS (SSNS). The medical records of 226 children, median 3.46 years (min 1.00, max 15.08) who referred to our clinics with SSNS between January 1978 and September 2005 were reviewed and entered into the study. Minimum duration of follow-up was 5 years and maximum 20 years (median 7.25 years). Of 226 patients who were treated with corticosteroids, 38 (16.8%) had no relapse but the remaining 188 (83.2%) patients experienced several relapses of which 128 patients (56.6%) required additional immunosuppressive agents for the remission. Of these, 122 (95%) were treated with levamisole, 22 (17%) with cyclosporine, 36 (28%) with cyclophosphamide, and ten (7.8 %) treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Several patients had to switch from one medication to others due to lack of response. On the last follow-up visit, 64(28.3%) patients were still under treatment, some patients had taken all of the above-mentioned drugs but still had multiple recurrences. Only 103 (45.5%) patients were in remission off the drug more than 3 years. This study shows that nearly one-third of pediatric patients with SSNS experience frequent relapses despite the combination of multiple immunosuppressive medications, which may continue until adulthood.

[Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: Incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome in the county of Gironde, France]

AIMS

To estimate the incidence and describe the clinical presentation and outcome (steroid responsiveness, clinical course, complications) of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children in a population-based retrospective study.

METHODS

Using local registries and the hospital discharge diagnosis system from two centers, all new cases of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were identified in Gironde (France) between January 1992 and May 2008. To estimate incidence, population-based denominators were obtained from the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Clinical data were collected from medical charts.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine cases of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were reported (66 boys, 18 non-Caucasians) with an incidence of 2.3/100,000 (CI, 1.8-3.0) children less than 15 years. Ninety patients (91%) had steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) and nine (9%) were steroid-resistant (SRNS). The median time to remission in SSNS was 11 days. Relapses occurred in 75 (83%) children with SSNS with a median of four relapses (range, 1-32). The cumulative relapse-free incidence was 60% at 10 years after diagnosis in SSNS and 13% of patients aged 18 years old or over still had active disease. In SSNS, the only significant factor associated with steroid dependency or use of non steroid drugs was the time to initial response to steroids greater than 14 days. Nineteen children (19%) experienced severe complications of nephrotic syndrome including 11 bacterial infections and two thromboembolic complications. Two children with SRNS, of whom one was initially steroid-responsive, developed end-stage renal failure.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and outcome of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Gironde are comparable to the rates found in other studies. The disease may have a long course and the time for response to steroids at disease onset is the main predictor of steroid dependency and of use of non steroid agents.

Management patterns of childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome

As an initial effort to identify opportunities to improve the management of children with nephrotic syndrome, the goal of this study was to assess the present-day management of children with primary nephrotic syndrome. A web-based survey was designed to assess the current management styles of all pediatric nephrology faculties at ten participating institutions. Ninety-one percent completed the initial survey. The duration of initial glucocorticoid therapy ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. Physicians reported that the recommendation for kidney biopsy was dependent on the response to initial corticosteroid therapy, with the minority always recommending a biopsy for frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent cases. All responding physicians recommended a kidney biopsy in steroid-resistant cases. Treatment strategies were reported to vary based upon the steroid response pattern and, where available, kidney histopathology. Striking variations in therapeutic preferences were described when alternatives to glucocorticoids were considered. The variability of management practices among pediatric nephrologists in the USA combined with the changing characteristics of our pediatric population raise concerns about our future strategies for improving healthcare for children coping with nephrotic syndrome. This variability is not unique to children's healthcare or to nephrology. However, a systematic approach to patient care and improvement in health outcomes has been shown to substantially improve morbidity and mortality outcomes in children with chronic health conditions.

Management of childhood onset nephrotic syndrome

The therapeutic approach to childhood nephrotic syndrome is based on a series of studies that began with an international collaborative effort sponsored by the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children in 1967. The characteristics of children presenting with nephrotic syndrome have changed over recent decades with greater frequency of the challenging condition focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and a greater prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus, which may be resistant to glucocorticoids in the former and exacerbated by long-term glucocorticoid therapy in the latter 2 conditions. The Children's Nephrotic Syndrome Consensus Conference was formed to systematically review the published literature and generate a children's primary nephrotic syndrome guideline for use in educational, therapeutic, and research venues.

Long-term follow-up after cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine-A therapy in steroid-dependent and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

A retrospective study was made on 37 children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). At the beginning, all patients were steroid sensitive but received more than one steroid course (median 4). Following several relapses, they became steroid dependent or steroid resistant. Group 1 consisted of 22 children [3 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 19 minimal-change NS (MCNS)] who received cyclophosphamide (CP) orally for 2.5 +/- 0.5 months. Group 2 consisted of 15 children (7 FSGS, 8 MCNS) who received cyclosporine-A (CSA) for 28 +/- 15 months. The level of proteinuria decreased significantly and remained low during the follow-up. The relapse-free period was significantly longer in the CP group (CP 30 +/- 21.5; CSA 26.2 +/- 18 months, p < 0.001). The relapse rate decreased significantly in both groups and remained in this lower level during the follow-up (from 3.4 +/- 2.8 to 0.1 +/- 0.2/year in group 1, and from 3.7 +/- 3.1 to 0.6 +/- 0.8/year in group 2). At the end of the 5-year follow-up, 20/22 patients (90.9%) and 10/15 patients (66.6%) were in remission in groups 1 and 2 respectively, with or without treatment (p < 0.05). In the long term, both CP and CSA is effective second-line therapy following steroid monotherapy in INS patients, but the relapse rate was lower and the relapse free period was significantly longer in the CP-treated group.

Adrenocortical suppression increases the risk of relapse in nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) are usually treated with long-term low dose alternate day prednisolone with or without glucocorticoid sparing therapy, such as levamisole or ciclosporin, to maintain remission. The degree of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) suppression with such therapeutic strategies has not been studied systematically. HPA suppression could cause a relapse or adrenal crisis.

STUDY DESIGN

To study the risks of HPA suppression, a modified low dose synacthen test (0.5 mug) was administered to 32 patients (22 male,10 female) with a mean age of 9.7 years (range 3.8-17.6 years) with NS receiving long-term alternate day prednisolone for over 12 months. Twelve patients received alternate day prednisolone, 11 alternate prednisolone+levamisole and nine alternate prednisolone+ciclosporin. All patients were followed up for 3 years and the relapse rate noted.

RESULTS

20/32 (62.5%) patients had a peak serum cortisol concentration of <500 nmol/l, which suggested suboptimal cortisol secretion and possible HPA suppression. 10/12 children in the prednisolone group and 8/11 in the levamisole group had a suboptimal cortisol response compared with 2/9 in the ciclosporin group. During follow-up, the 20 children who had a suboptimal cortisol response had significantly more relapses (95 relapses) compared to the 12 children with a normal cortisol response who had 24 relapses (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with NS receiving long-term alternate day prednisolone therapy are at risk of developing HPA suppression and should be evaluated using the modified synacthen test. Children with evidence of HPA suppression are at a greater risk of relapse.

Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children

Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients.

Treatment of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a chronic glomerular disorder, and if untreated, is associated with increased risk of life-threatening infections, thromboembolism, lipid abnormalities, and malnutrition. The aim of the management of NS in children is to induce and maintain complete remission with resolution of proteinuria and edema without encountering serious adverse effects of therapy. Over 90% of cases in children are due to minimal change disease (MCD) and a majority of them will respond to corticosteroid therapy. Steroid sensitive NS is considered to be a relatively benign condition; progression to end stage renal failure is extremely rare and over 80% achieve spontaneous remission in later childhood. The early disease is characterized by a relapsing course, placing the child at risk of acute complications. The occurrence of frequent relapses necessitates clear therapeutic strategies in order to maintain sustained remission and minimize steroid toxicity. Numerous therapeutic regimens have been proposed utilizing steroid sparing agents such as alkylating agents, principally, cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil, calcineurin inhibitors namely cyclosporin A and immunomodulatory drug levamisole with variable success and associated side-effects. It is therefore important that the benefits and risks of these agents are weighed before considering their use in the treatment of patients with NS.

[Immunity and immunosuppression in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome]

Steroid sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is a T-cell disorder characterized by a functional renal impairment. Concluding a still relevant demonstration involving cellular immunity in the pathogenesis of the disease, R. Shalhoub in 1974 suggested a "special role for the thymus" based on the efficiency of steroids and alkylating agents, dramatic recoveries following measles, sensibility to bacterial infection due to a lack of cooperation between T and B cell and association to Hodgkin disease. As a matter of fact, the selected drugs based on medical empirism somehow enhance thymocytes apoptosis and negative selection of T cell, except cyclosporin. Steroids have been the first historical treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and have steadily been the first-line treatment for 50 years. Their unavoidable ability to induce rapid recovery of proteinuria and long-lasting or definite remission are dependent to a strict compliance to treatment. Indications of steroids-sparing treatments are not that clearcut in patients with steroids intoxication. Objectively, efficiency of levamisole and cyclophosphamide are much more limited than previously reported and cyclosporin nephrotoxicity might severely impair renal function following long-lasting treatment as well as it may paradoxically increase the activity of the disease. An alternate strategy to those currently adopted would use cyclosporin as the first-line steroids-sparing treatment during a very limited period, awaiting favourable ageing of patients and natural dampening activity of the disease to a full efficiency of alkylating agents. Compared to cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin, the relative safety of levamisole is encouraging to a more frequent uses. Its association to a full dose of prednisone in the treatment of the inaugural episode should be investigated. According to the limitations of those therapies, emerging drugs as mycophenolate might be worthwhile in the treatment of nephrotic patients.

Levamisole in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome of childhood: the lost paradise?

Among the different drugs used for sparing steroids in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) with frequent relapses and steroid dependency, levamisole is the least toxic and the least expensive. However, it is neither approved for this indication nor widely used in Europe. This may be explained by the difficulty in obtaining levamisole in some countries and the lack of good quality evidence for its effectiveness. Evidence is limited to three clinical trials that all suffered from methodological limitations. Statistical synthesis of these trials showed that levamisole reduces the risk of a relapse during treatment (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.79). From the available information, no conclusions can be drawn on the steroid-sparing effect, the long-term efficacy, and safety, as well as possible differences in efficacy in different subgroups of SSNS patients. The confirmation of a favorable effect of levamisole on the reduction of the frequency of relapses and on sparing steroids in an adequately powered, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center clinical trial will promote consensus on the place of levamisole in the treatment of SSNS of childhood. Follow-up should be at least 1 year to evaluate long-term efficacy and side effects. If the results of such a clinical trial confirm the beneficial effects of levamisole in nephrotic syndrome, this may allow registration for this indication and interest companies other than Jansen-Cilag, which only recently has decided to stop its production.

Long-term effects of levamisole treatment in childhood nephrotic syndrome

The effects of levamisole treatment on long-term outcome were evaluated in a retrospective study of frequently-relapsing (FRNS, n=15), steroid-dependent (SDNS, n=13), and steroid-resistant (SRNS, n=6) nephrotic syndrome in 34 children (21 boys, 13 girls, mean age 5.0+/-3.4 years) during a 60-month follow-up period. The definition of frequent relapses was > or = 4 relapses per year. The current relapse was treated with prednisolone 60 mg/m2 per day for 4 weeks, then with 40 mg/m2 every other day for 4 weeks, after which the dose was tapered by 10 mg weekly. From the beginning of the 5th week, levamisole was introduced at a dose of 2 mg/kg per day. The duration of levamisole treatment was 17+/-7 months. Before starting levamisole treatment the mean level of proteinuria was 2.17+/-1.34 g/day and the relapse rate was 4.41/year. By the end of levamisole therapy, proteinuria had fallen to 0.142+/-0.211 g/day and the relapse rate to 0.41/year. No relapse occurred in 23 of the 34 patients during levamisole treatment. In the 24-month follow-up period after the discontinuation of levamisole, 28 children remained in total remission, while 6 had relapses. The cumulative steroid dose before levamisole therapy was 7,564.4+/-3,497.1 mg/year and following the introduction of levamisole 1,472.9+/-1,729.9 mg/year (P<0.0001). We observed reversible neutropenia in 5 patients, but no other side effects were seen. Our findings suggest that in FRNS and SDNS levamisole significantly reduces both the relapse rate and the cumulative steroid dose; therefore, it could be recommended for these patients. In SRNS patients it has also some benefit because proteinuria and the cumulative steroid dose could be reduced significantly.

Recurrence of severe steroid dependency in cyclosporin A-treated childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

In patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), long-term remission (LTR) can usually be achieved with cyclosporin A (CSA), after alternative treatment with cytotoxic drugs or levamisole has failed. Nevertheless, severe SDNS recurs in some patients despite CSA maintenance therapy. Few data are available on the clinical course and treatment strategies in these patients.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective chart analysis of 46 patients with SDNS treated with CSA, after failure of cytotoxic treatment with cyclophosphamide (CPO). Median age at primary manifestation was 3.0 years (range 0.8-6.9) and median current age is 20.4 years (range 8.6-29.1). Patients were recruited from three centres caring for a total of 186 patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

RESULTS

In 14 of the 46 patients (30%; 10 male), severe SDNS recurred again despite CSA maintenance therapy. Seven patients relapsed beyond the age of 18 years. Nine of 14 patients received a further course of cytotoxic treatment as first intervention: six were treated with chlorambucil (CLA) and three with CPO. Four of the CLA-treated patients remained in LTR in contrast to none after CPO. Five patients received levamisole after CSA: only one went into LTR, while in one other CSA could be discontinued although further relapses occurred. One further patient was switched to CLA after levamisole, finally inducing LTR. Overall, six patients required two or more drugs, and in four of these CSA maintenance ultimately had to be restarted.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that SDNS can recur in patients despite CSA maintenance therapy. Treatment strategies for this subgroup of patients are complex and should be standardized to optimize long-term outcome. A subgroup of patients with childhood SDNS continues to relapse into adulthood.