Survey of rituximab treatment for childhood-onset refractory nephrotic syndrome

Rituximab in combination with cyclosporine and steroid pulse therapy for childhood-onset multidrug-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter single-arm clinical trial (JSKDC11 trial)

BACKGROUND

Only 80% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond well to glucocorticoid therapy. Multidrug-resistant nephrotic syndrome (MRNS) is associated with a poor kidney prognosis. Several retrospective studies have identified rituximab as an effective treatment for MRNS; however, prospective studies are required to assess its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, non-blinded, single-arm trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with childhood-onset MRNS who were resistant to cyclosporine and more than three courses of steroid pulse therapy. The enrolled patients received four 375 mg/m2 doses of rituximab in combination with baseline cyclosporine and steroid pulse therapy. The primary endpoint was a > 50% reduction in the urinary protein/creatinine ratio from baseline on day 169. Complete and partial remissions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Six patients with childhood-onset MRNS were enrolled. All patients were negative for pathogenic variants of podocyte-related genes. On day 169, five patients (83.3%) showed a > 50% reduction in the urinary protein/creatinine ratio, two patients showed partial remission, and two patients showed complete remission. No deaths occurred and severe adverse events occurred in two patients (infection in one patient and acute kidney injury in one patient). Three patients needed treatment for moderate-to-severe infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The study treatment effectively reduced the urinary protein/creatinine ratio in patients with childhood-onset MRNS. The adverse events in this study were within the expected range; however, attention should be paid to the occurrence of infections.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Rituximab-Associated Infections Among Children and Adolescents With Glomerular Disease: Focus on the Risk of Infections

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore rituximab (RTX) associated infectious complications in children with glomerular disease.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search of PubMed, International Scientific Information (ISI), Scopus, and EMBASE between January 2010 and July 2021. Infection rates and total drug-related adverse events were the outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by using the I2 statistic. When there was statistical evidence of heterogeneity (I2 > 50%, p > 0.1), a random-effect model was adopted. Data analysis was performed with Stata17.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies with 668 patients (136 with lupus nephritis [LN] and 532 with nephrotic syndrome were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio showed that the administration of RTX was significantly associated with lower risk of infectious complications in patients with LN and nephrotic syndrome (0.72 [95% CI 0.58, 0.85]) when compared with population data of patients without glomerular disease (p = 0.2). There was no significant difference between the LN and nephrotic syndrome groups in terms of total serious adverse events or the occurrence of infections. There was significant heterogeneity among the reported studies (Q = 42.39, p < 0.001, I2 = 81%).

CONCLUSION

Administration of RTX in children with glomerular disease is associated with a lower rate of infections when compared with population data of patients without LN or nephrotic syndrome. Additional high-quality randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to identify the long-term potential complications. Trial registration PROPERO ID: CRD42021274869 (https://www.crd.york.ac/prospero/display_record.php?).

Use of Rituximab in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Rituximab is an established therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to sustain short- to medium-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. Recent trials focus on its use as a first-line agent among those with milder disease severity. Rituximab is used in multidrug refractory nephrotic syndrome and post-transplant disease recurrence, although the evidence is much less substantial. Available data suggest that the treatment response to rituximab depends on various patient factors, dosing regimen, and the concomitant use of maintenance immunosuppression. After repeated treatments, patients are found to have an improving response overall with a longer relapse-free period. The drug effect, however, is not permanent, and 80% of patients eventually relapse and many will require an additional course of rituximab. This underpins the importance of understanding the long-term safety profile on repeated treatments. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are concerns about long-term hypogammaglobulinemia, especially in young children. Reliable immunophenotyping and biomarkers are yet to be discovered to predict treatment success, risk of both rare and severe side effects, e.g. , persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and guiding of redosing strategy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of rituximab for childhood nephrotic syndrome and how the therapeutic landscape is evolving.

First clinical application of cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells in children with multi-drug resistant nephrotic syndrome

Background and objectives

Children with multi-drug resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (MDR-INS) usually progress to end-stage kidney disease with a consistent risk of disease recurrence after transplantation. New therapeutic options are needed for these patients. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotential non-hematopoietic cells with several immunomodulatory properties and growing clinical applications. Cord blood-derived MSC have peculiar anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. We aimed at assessing safety and efficacy of cord-blood-derived MSCs (CB-MSCs) in children with MDR-INS.

Design, setting, participants

Prospective, open-label, single arm phase I–II pilot study. Pediatric patients with MDR-INS, resistant to at least two lines of therapy, were enrolled. Allogenic CB-MSCs were administered intravenously on days 0, 14, and 21 at a dose of 1.5 × 10⁶ cells/kg. Patients were followed for at least 12 months. The primary outcomes were safety and toxicity. The secondary outcome was remission at 12 months evaluated by urinary protein/urinary creatinine ratio (uPr/uCr). Circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs) were monitored.

Results

Eleven pediatric patients with MDR-INS (10 females, median age 13 years) resistant to a median of 3 previous lines of therapy were enrolled. All patients completed the CB-MSC infusion schedule. No patient experienced any infusion-related adverse event or toxicity. Nine patients were assessable for efficacy. At the 12 months follow-up after the treatment, the median uPr/uCr did not change significantly from baseline (8.13 vs. 9.07; p = 0.98), while 3 patients were in partial or complete remission. A lower baseline uPr/uCr was a predictor of remission (2.55 vs. 8.74; p = 0.0238). Tregs count was not associated with CB-MSCs therapy.

Conclusions

CB-MSCs are safe and may have a role in the immunosuppressive therapy of pediatric patients with MDR-INS. This preliminary experience paves the way toward further phase II studies addressing MSC efficacy in immune-mediated kidney diseases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-03112-7.

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Efficacy of rituximab therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome: a 10-year experience from an Iranian pediatric hospital

Background

There are controversy results in the optimal management of children with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SDNS, SRNS). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in these pediatric patients.

Methods

Medical records of 1–18-year-old Iranian children with SDNS (n = 26) and SRNS (n = 22) with a follow-up for at least 24 months were included from 2009 to 2019. The short- and long-term responses to RTX were respectively evaluated to determine the random protein-to-creatinine ratio after 6 and 24 months and classified as complete (CR) and partial (PR) remission or no response.

Results

Male patients (n = 26) were slightly predominate. The median age of patients at the time of RTX therapy was 8.6 ± 4.01 years. At the end of the 6-month follow-up, CR and PR occurred in 23 (47.9%) and 12 (25%) patients, respectively. Of 23 patients with CR, 18 (69.2%) and 5(22.7%) had SDNS and SRNS, respectively (p < 0.005). However, only 18 (37.5%) of patients after 24 months had been in CR. No significant difference in the CR rate was found between the two groups. RTX was more effective when administered during the proteinuria-free period (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In the short term, RTX significantly was efficient in inducing complete or PR in SDNS and SRNS patients. However, the favorable response rate in a long-term follow-up was insignificantly lower between the two groups.

Rituximab in children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: in quest of the optimal regimen

Rituximab has emerged as an effective and important therapy in children with complicated frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome to induce long-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. The optimal rituximab regimen is not totally well defined, and there are many varying practices worldwide. We will in this review describe how patient factors, rituximab dose, and use of maintenance immunosuppression affect treatment outcomes. Specifically, low-dose rituximab without concomitant immunosuppression is associated with shorter relapse-free duration while other regimens have comparable outcomes. Patients with more severe disease generally have worse response to rituximab. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are growing concerns of chronic hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired immunity especially in young children. Reliable prognostications and biomarkers for guiding subsequent treatments to avoid excessive treatments are yet to be identified. In this review, we will outline the, as we see it, best approach of rituximab in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome at the present state of knowledge.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Rituximab for Steroid-Dependent or Frequently Relapsing Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX) for steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: All the literature about RTX therapy for childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS) on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Chinese biomedical literature database published before November 1, 2019, were conducted and selected according to the preset criteria. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the literature included. The outcome data were analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: There were six RCT studies that met the inclusion criteria with a moderate quality after evaluation. At the end of the treatment, the relapse rate of NS in the RTX group reduced significantly when compared with that in the control group [odds ratio (OR) = 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.03, 0.43), p = 0.001]. The number of patients in the RTX group used less steroid or/and calcineurin inhibitors significantly than that in the control group [OR = 0.05, 95% CI (0.01, 0.28), p = 0.0007]. For children who were steroid-dependent, RTX treatment significantly reduced the dosage of the steroid, compared with that in control [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.49, 95% CI (-2.00, -0.99), p < 0.00001]. There was no significant reduction in protein excretion between the two groups [SMD = -0.33, 95% CI (-0.71, 0.04), p = 0.08]. Fewer serious adverse reactions of RTX in the six studies were reported and most adverse events were mild. Conclusion: RTX is effective and safe for children with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Systematic Review Registration: Identifier: CRD 42020150933. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. This review has been registered to the PROSPERO on 27 Feb 2020.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

Podocyte sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase acid-like 3b decreases among children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

AIM

Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase acid-like 3b (SMPDL-3b), a regulator of the cytoskeleton, is expressed on podocytes. Recent reports present evidence that it is directly targeted by rituximab in the treatment of intractable nephrotic syndrome. However, the implications of SMPDL-3b for treatment of paediatric-onset idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the level of expression of SMPDL-3b in urine, serum, and biopsy specimens and explore its implications in treatment of patients with INS.

METHODS

Levels of urinary SMPDL-3b among 31 patients (20 in remission and 11 in relapse) with INS were analysed by dot blotting. For reference of precise quantitative analysis, we examined urinary excretion of SMPDL-3b from 10 patients with INS by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in both remitted and relapsed status. The levels of serum SMPDL-3b among 20 patients (13 in remission and 7 in relapse or onset) with INS were also measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Further, the immunoreactivity of SMPDL-3b in the biopsy specimens obtained from patients with INS was compared with those from patients with proteinuric IgA nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and non-proteinuric controls.

RESULTS

Urinary excretion of SMPDL-3b in patients with INS was significantly decreased in relapse cases compared with cases of remission and other types of proteinuric glomerular disease or controls by both dot blotting and LC-MS/MS method. On the other hand, serum SMPDL-3b level in INS was not different between cases of remission and relapse. Glomerular immunoreactivity of SMPDL-3b in patient with INS in remission was almost the same level to that of control.

CONCLUSION

The expression of SMPDL-3b on podocytes is specifically decreased in paediatric-onset INS and its urinary excretion level reflects such conditions.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome newly affects 1-3 per 100,000 children per year. Approximately 85% of cases show complete remission of proteinuria following glucocorticoid treatment. Patients who do not achieve complete remission within 4-6 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In 10-30% of steroid-resistant patients, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor of immune origin is assumed in the remaining ones. Diagnosis and management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission by further immunosuppressive treatment, and severe complications including the development of end-stage kidney disease and recurrence after renal transplantation. A team of experts including pediatric nephrologists and renal geneticists from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), a renal pathologist, and an adult nephrologist have now developed comprehensive clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis and management of SRNS in children. The team performed a systematic literature review on 9 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, formulated recommendations and formally graded them at a consensus meeting, with input from patient representatives and a dietician acting as external advisors and a voting panel of pediatric nephrologists. Research recommendations are also given.

Response to First Course of Intensified Immunosuppression in Genetically Stratified Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intensified immunosuppression in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome is broadly applied, with disparate outcomes. This review of patients from the United Kingdom National Study of Nephrotic Syndrome cohort aimed to improve disease stratification by determining, in comprehensively genetically screened patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, if there is an association between response to initial intensified immunosuppression and disease progression and/or post-transplant recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Pediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome were recruited via the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases. All patients were whole-genome sequenced, whole-exome sequenced, or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome gene-panel sequenced. Complete response or partial response within 6 months of starting intensified immunosuppression was ascertained using laboratory data. Response to intensified immunosuppression and outcomes were analyzed according to genetic testing results, pattern of steroid resistance, and first biopsy findings.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients, 178 (92 males, median onset age 4.7 years) received intensified immunosuppression with response available. A total of 4% of patients with monogenic disease showed complete response, compared with 25% of genetic-testing-negative patients (P=0.02). None of the former recurred post-transplantation. In genetic-testing-negative patients, 97% with complete response to first intensified immunosuppression did not progress, whereas 44% of nonresponders developed kidney failure with 73% recurrence post-transplant. Secondary steroid resistance had a higher complete response rate than primary/presumed resistance (43% versus 23%; P=0.001). The highest complete response rate in secondary steroid resistance was to rituximab (64%). Biopsy results showed no correlation with intensified immunosuppression response or outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with monogenic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome had a poor therapeutic response and no post-transplant recurrence. In genetic-testing-negative patients, there was an association between response to first intensified immunosuppression and long-term outcome. Patients with complete response rarely progressed to kidney failure, whereas nonresponders had poor kidney survival and a high post-transplant recurrence rate. Patients with secondary steroid resistance were more likely to respond, particularly to rituximab.

Rituximab therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Use of rituximab (RTX) for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and minimal change disease (MCD) is widely described in children. Clinical evidence in adults is limited. The objective of this study was to determine the treatment outcomes of RTX in adults with FSGS and MCD.

Methods

Ovid MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched up to September 2019. Out of 699 studies, we included 16 studies describing the treatment outcomes of rituximab in adult patients with FSGS or MCD. Results were reported in remission rate and relapse rate. Serious adverse events were also reported.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in our review and analysis. All studies were observational studies and included a total of 221 patients (23.1% FSGS, 76.9% MCD). Mean follow-up duration was 26.3 ± 12.8 months. From the analysis of five studies with FSGS patients (n = 51), the overall remission rate and relapse rate of RTX therapy was 53.6% (95% CI, 15.8–87.6%) and 47.3% (95% CI, 25.4–70.2%), respectively. Complete remission occurred in 42.9%. In contrast, from the analysis of 11 studies with MCD patients (n = 170), the overall remission rate and relapse rate of RTX therapy was 80.3% (95% CI, 68.5–88.5%) and 35.9% (95% CI, 25.1–48.4), respectively. Complete remission occurred in 74.7%. Subgroup analyses showed that overall remission and relapse were not different after adjusted for study year and RTX dose for both FSGS and MCD. Incidence of serious adverse events was 0.092 events/year.

Conclusions

Rituximab may be considered as an additional treatment to the standard therapy for adult patients with FSGS and MCD. Remissions and relapses are similar between FSGS and MCD. Serious adverse effects of rituximab were uncommon. We encourage further randomized controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of rituximab therapy in these patients.

Rituximab therapy for refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

Patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) who develop resistance to immunosuppressive agents, defined as refractory SRNS, have poor renal outcomes. Although the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has shown efficacy for frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, its efficacy for refractory SRNS remains uncertain due to limited data. According to previous case reports, 50.4% of patients with refractory SRNS showed clinical improvements after rituximab treatment. Remission rates in patients with initial steroid resistance and late steroid resistance were 43.9 and 57.7%, respectively, and 41.5 and 63.6% in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minor glomerular abnormalities, respectively. However, various factors (race, disease severity, number of rituximab doses, concomitant treatments, and observation period) differed among these observational studies and their consensus may also have been affected by potential publication bias. Rituximab monotherapy may have some degree of efficacy and lead to satisfactory outcomes in a subset of patients with refractory SRNS. However, administration of concomitant treatments during rituximab-mediated B cell depletion, such as methylprednisolone pulse therapy, daily oral prednisolone therapy, and immunosuppressive agents, may lead to better outcomes in these patients. Large-scale, multi-center prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such regimens.

Treatment of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in the genomic era

The pathogenesis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is not completely known. Recent advances in genomics have elucidated some of the molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of the disease. More than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS have been identified; however, these genes are responsible for only a small fraction of SRNS in outbred populations. There are currently no guidelines for genetic testing in SRNS, but evidence from the literature suggests that testing should be guided by the genetic architecture of the disease in the population. Notably, most genetic forms of SRNS do not respond to current immunosuppressive therapies; however, a small subset of patients with monogenic SRNS will achieve partial or complete remission with specific immunomodulatory agents, presumably due to non-immunosuppressive effects of these agents. We suggest a pragmatic approach to the therapy of genetic SRNS, as there is no evidence-based algorithm for the management of the disease.

Both the rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression in steroid-dependent/frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome have important effects on outcomes

Rituximab is an effective treatment for steroid-dependent/ frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDFRNS) in children. However, the optimal rituximab regimen remains unknown. To help determine this we conducted an international, multicenter retrospective study at 11 tertiary pediatric nephrology centers in Asia, Europe and North America of children 1-18 years of age with complicated SDFRNS receiving rituximab between 2005-2016 for 18 or more months follow-up. The effect of rituximab prescribed at three dosing levels: low (375mg/m²), medium (750mg/m²) and high (1125-1500mg/m²), with or without maintenance immunosuppression (defined as concurrent use of corticosteroids, mycophenolate motile or calcineurin inhibition at first relapse or for at least six months following the rituximab treatment) was examined. Among the 511 children (median age 11.5 year, 67% boys), 191, 208 and 112 received low, medium and high dose rituximab, respectively. Within this total cohort of 511 children, 283 (55%) received maintenance immunosuppression. Renal biopsies were performed in 317 children indicating the predominant histology was minimal change disease (74%). Without maintenance immunosuppression, low-dose rituximab had a shorter relapse-free period and a higher relapse risk (8.5 months) than medium (12.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62) and high dose (14.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; all significant). With maintenance immunosuppression, the relapse-free survival in low-dose rituximab (14 months) was similar to medium (10.9 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23) and high dose (12.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; all non-significant). Most adverse events were mild. Thus, children receiving low-dose rituximab without maintenance immunosuppression had the shortest relapse-free survival. Hence, both rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression have important effects on the treatment outcomes.

Long-term outcomes after early treatment with rituximab for Japanese children with cyclosporine- and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Although rituximab (RTX) may be effective treatment in children with nephrotic syndrome who are resistant to cyclosporine A and steroid (CsA-SRNS), long-term outcomes after B cell depleting therapy remain unclear.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses (median follow-up, 5.1 years) of six CsA-SRNS children (three boys; median age at RTX, 4.2 years) unresponsive to oral cyclosporine combined with ≥ 2 courses of intravenous methylprednisolone pulses, who received RTX within 6 months after disease onset (median 11 weeks). After initial RTX treatment (median two doses of 375 mg/m²) followed by retreatment with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses and/or high-dose prednisolone, all patients achieved complete remission at a median of 158 days. Although 17 relapses occurred in five patients during follow-up, all but one patient became steroid sensitive. Severe neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia developed in two and four patients, respectively. However, no life-threatening infections were identified in the cohort. At last visit (median age, 11.3 years), all patients maintained complete remission without renal insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Although late-onset adverse events should be considered, particularly for young patients, early RTX treatment may have positive outcomes in children with CsA-SRNS in the long term.

Low-dose rituximab is no less effective for nephrotic syndrome measured by 12-month outcome

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab is an effective treatment for children with steroid dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. The optimum dosing schedule for rituximab has not been established. We hypothesized that a single low dose of 375 mg/m² would have comparable outcomes to higher doses in reducing the frequency of relapse and time to B cell reconstitution.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study of children with steroid-sensitive frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Data were extracted from clinical records including the dates of diagnosis, treatment, relapses, the use of concomitant immunosuppression, and lymphocyte subset profiling. Patients treated earlier received variable doses of rituximab, although typically two doses of 750 mg/m². Later, patients received the current regimen of a single dose of 375 mg/m². The primary outcome was an absence of clinically confirmed relapse 12 months following rituximab administration. Secondary outcomes were median time to relapse, probability of being relapse-free at 6 and 24 months and time to reconstitution of CD19⁺ B cells.

RESULTS

Sixty patients received 143 courses of rituximab. Seven different dosing regimen strategies were used, ranging between 375 and 750 mg/m² per dose, with administration of 1-4 doses. There was no significant difference in event-free survival at 12 months between dosing strategies. The median time to reconstitution of B cells was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a single low-dose regimen of rituximab in the management of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome does not affect the probability of relapse at 12 months or time to B cell reconstitution compared to a conventional higher dose.

Periodically repeated rituximab administrations in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome: 2-year multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) is effective in maintaining remission in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), but a standard protocol of RTX administration has not been established.

METHODS

This study was a 2-year multicenter observational study, in which consistent treatments and evaluations were performed. We enrolled pediatric patients with refractory NS between January 2015 and December 2015. RTX infusion was performed four times at 6-month intervals, followed by mizoribine pulse therapy with early discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Primary endpoints were the relapse-free survival rate and the number of relapses after RTX administration. Secondary endpoints were changes in side effects associated with long-term steroid administration.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were analyzed. The relapse-free survival rate at 1 year and 2 years was 50 and 46%, respectively. Twenty-one patients accomplished our protocol and the frequency of relapse was reduced under the discontinuation of CNI. Although two patients were diagnosed with frequent relapse and/or steroid dependency during the observation period, the frequency of relapse decreased with each rituximab dose. Statistically significant improvements in all steroid complications were observed in the final examination, but no significant improvements were observed from 1 to 2 years after RTX administration. One patient had agranulocytosis, and three patients showed electrocardiographic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our protocol was useful and safe for refractory NS. However, RTX administration four times might have been excessive in patients who had no relapse by 1 year after the initial RTX administration. Further investigation of the most appropriate method of RTX administration is required.

Rituximab Use in the Management of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

Childhood nephrotic syndrome is a challenging and often persistent renal disorder, and its incidence varies between different ethnicities and regions. Corticosteroids have been the main treatment for decades and are effective in most children with idiopathic NS, although 10-15% of these children become steroid resistant. Furthermore, some initially steroid sensitive children follow a steroid dependent or frequently relapsing course and are therefore at increased risk for developing steroid toxicity. In such children, alternative immunosuppressive medications are used to induce and/or maintain remission of NS. One such drug, rituximab, is a monoclonal antibody directed against the B lymphocyte CD20 marker which induces depletion of B cells, and has shown promising results in the management of NS in children. In this review, we summarize recent studies on the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the different types of childhood nephrotic syndrome, the known and potential mechanisms of action of rituximab, its possible complications and side effects, and the available and potential biomarkers of rituximab activity.

Multicenter analysis of the efficacy and safety of a non-standard immunosuppressive therapy with rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

The aim of the study was a multicenter analysis of the efficacy and safety of a non-standard immunosuppressive therapy with rituximab (Rtx) in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) with particular emphasis on the possibility of permanent discontinuation or dose reduction of other immunosuppressive drugs such as glucocorticoids and cyclosporine A after 6 months of observation. The study group consisted of 30 children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who were unresponsive to standard immunosuppressive treatment, and hospitalized in the years 2010-2017 in eight paediatric nephrology centres in Poland. The children were administered a single initial infusion of rituximab at the dose of 375 mg/m² of the body surface area. Proteinuria, the daily supply of glucocorticoids, and cyclosporine were assessed at the moment of the start of the treatment and after 6 months since its commencement. Before Rtx therapy, complete remission was found in 13 patients (43%) and partial remission was found in 8 patients (26%). These numbers increased to 16 (53%) and 12 (40%), respectively. At the start of the treatment 23 patients (76.6%) were treated with cyclosporine A. After 6 months, this number decreased to 15 patients (35%). At the start of the treatment, 18 patients (60%) were treated with prednisone. After 6 months, this number decreased to 8 patients (44%). Children with SRNS may potentially benefit from Rtx treatment despite relative risk of side effects. The benefits may include reduction of proteinuria or reduction of other immunosuppressants.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in childhood-onset, difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome: A multicenter open-label trial in Korea

BACKGROUND

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) has been proposed as a rescue therapy for difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome (NS). We conducted a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in children with difficult-to-treat NS dependent on or resistant to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).

METHODS

A multicenter open-label trial was performed at 8 major pediatric nephrology centers in Korea. The investigation consisted of a randomized controlled trial for steroid- and CNI-dependent NS (DDNS; randomization into the RTX group and the control group, at a ratio of 2:1) and a single-arm study of steroid and CNI-resistant NS (DRNS). DDNS patients in the RTX group and DRNS patients received a single dose of intravenous RTX (375 mg/m of body surface area) for B-cell depletion. A second RTX dose was administered at week 2 if the first dose failed to achieve depletion of CD19(+) cells. The primary endpoint was rate of maintaining remission at 6 months after treatment for DDNS and rate of remission achievement for DRNS.

RESULTS

Sixty-one children with DDNS were enrolled while in remission and randomized to the control group (21 patients) or the RTX group (40 patients). At 6 months after treatment, the remission rates were 74.3% in the RTX group and 31.3% in the control group (P = .003). The mean duration of remission maintenance was significantly higher in the RTX group than in the control group (9.0 vs 2.9 months, P = .004). Of the 23 patients with DRNS enrolled in the single-arm study and treated with RTX, 9 (39.1%) achieved partial or complete remission within 6 months. Depletion of B cells occurred in all patients with RTX therapy. Thirty patients (50.8% of 59 patients analyzed) experienced mild and transient infusion reaction during RTX administration, and most adverse events were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX administration was safe and effective in patients with difficult-to-treat NS. One or 2 doses of RTX may be sufficient to deplete B cells and achieve better control of pediatric NS.

Management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents

More than 85% of children and adolescents (majority between 1-12 years old) with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome show complete remission of proteinuria following daily treatment with corticosteroids. Patients who do not show remission after 4 weeks' treatment with daily prednisolone are considered to have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Renal histology in most patients shows presence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, and (rarely) mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. A third of patients with SRNS show mutations in one of the key podocyte genes. The remaining cases of SRNS are probably caused by an undefined circulating factor. Treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (ciclosporin and tacrolimus) is the standard of care for patients with non-genetic SRNS, and approximately 70% of patients achieve a complete or partial remission and show satisfactory long-term outcome. Additional treatment with drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin axis is recommended for hypertension and for reducing remaining proteinuria. Patients with SRNS who do not respond to treatment with calcineurin inhibitors or other immunosuppressive drugs can show declining kidney function and are at risk for end-stage renal failure. Approximately a third of those who undergo renal transplantation show recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the allograft and often respond to combined treatment with plasma exchange, rituximab, and intensified immunosuppression.

Difficult-to-treat idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: established drugs, open questions and future options

The idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood can be classified according to the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC) based on the response to steroids. Typically, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is characterised by minimal changes in disease (MCD) histology, whereas in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most prevalent lesion. Patients with SSNS may develop frequent relapses and/or steroid dependency, which can be difficult to treat. New studies confirm the value of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and mycophenolic acid in preventing relapses of SSNS. Rituximab also plays an important role, but many questions regarding initial dosing, repetitions of courses, and long-term side effects remain unclear. SRNS, especially when unresponsive to treatment, can lead to chronic kidney disease. In particular, treatment with CNIs has improved the prognosis and recent data indicate that treatment can even be discontinued in many patients with full remission. In CNI-unresponsive SRNS, rituximab is less effective than in SSNS and the role of other biologicals (such as ofatumumab, abatacept, and others) remains unclear. A significant proportion of children with FSGS have genetic causes and most patients do not respond to immunosuppression, although individual patients with partial and even complete response have been documented. Future studies should evaluate treatments leading to long-term remission without maintenance immunosuppression in SSNS; in both genetic and immune-mediated SRNS, novel options to decrease the number of treatment-unresponsive patients seem mandatory, as they are at a high risk of developing end-stage renal disease.

Rituximab in The Management of Pediatric Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was performed. Data from studies, performed before April 2017 were collected, from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational studies with a minimal sample size of 5 patients, regarding treatment with rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Independent extraction of articles by 2 investigators using predefined data fields was performed.

RESULTS

We included 7 case series and 1 open-label randomized controlled trial. Among them, 3 studies were multicenter. A total of 226 patients were included. Mean age at onset was 5.6 ± 1.1 years. Mean number of rituximab administrations was 3.1 ± 1.1 infusions per patient. Remission was observed in 89 patients (46.4%). Remission was seen in 40.8% patients with initial steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 52.8% patients with late steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Good initial response to rituximab therapy was observed in 63.2% patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome, 39.2% patients with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, 1 patient had diffuse mesangial hypercellularity, and 1 patient had IgM nephropathy. Sustained remission ranged from 18% to 93.7%. Five serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab exhibited a satisfactory profile regarding efficacy and safety indicating that this agent is a promising therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and should be further investigated by randomized clinical trials.

Serum sickness with refractory nephrotic syndrome following treatment with rituximab

Rituximab (RTX) is effective for treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome (NS), such as steroid-dependent (SD), frequently relapsing (FR), and steroid-resistant (SR) NS. While RTX has been proven to be effective in treating SDNS, FRNS, and SRNS, it may cause serum sickness, a rare illness characterized by fever, rash, and arthralgia, 10-14 days after primary antigen exposure or within a few days after secondary antigen exposure, by producing human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACAs). A 17-year-old girl with refractory SDNS treated with RTX and oral cyclosporine A was admitted with fever and arthralgia 10 days after the fifth RTX dose was administered. After RTX was started when she was 14-years-old, SDNS remission was then achieved, and prednisolone was discontinued. Although antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents were administered, fever and arthralgia continued. After various inspections and clinical course, we considered her as RTX-induced serum sickness (RISS). The patient had an elevated HACA level and was diagnosed with RISS. Fever and arthralgia disappeared 5 days after onset. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of RISS with NS. Fever, rash, and arthralgia after RTX administration can be the initial symptoms.

High-Dose Rituximab Ineffective for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Long-Term Observation Study

BACKGROUND

A beneficial effect of rituximab (RTX) on focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in pediatric patients or in transplant recipients has been reported in isolated cases. However, the use of RTX in adult patients with idiopathic FSGS needs further investigation.

METHODS

Eight patients who had biopsy-proven FSGS (63.9 ± 14.0, range 40-81 years, 4 women, 4 men) with major risk factors precluding corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppression were treated with a high dose of RTX (8 weekly doses of 375 mg/m2) and prospectively followed up for at least 2 years (29.1 ± 8.8 months, range 24-42 months).

RESULTS

RTX failed to improve proteinuria in 7 out of 8 patients, who had persistent nephrotic proteinuria. In one case, a rapidly deteriorating renal function was also observed. Only one patient showed an improvement in renal function and a remarkable reduction in proteinuria. There were no differences in clinical or laboratory characteristics or in the CD20 B lymphocyte count after RTX between the responder and the 7 nonresponder patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a minority (1 of 8) in our series of adult patients with FSGS showed positive effects of high doses of RTX. Future studies are warranted to investigate more promising therapeutic options in the management of FSGS.

Rituximab in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: experience of a tertiary center and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Rituximab (RTX) is a new treatment option in children with difficult-to-treat steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We evaluated the experience of our tertiary center and reviewed the current literature.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating the efficacy and safety of RTX in children with difficult-to-treat SDNS. Age at diagnosis, type and duration of immunosuppression, age at administration, dose of RTX, possible adverse events, number of relapses, duration of remission, and B-cell count after administration of RTX were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine children with a median age at diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome of 4.75 (range 1.33-11.33) years and a median age at administration of RTX of 16.08 (range 3.33-19.25) years were included. Before administration of RTX they had a median number of relapses per year of 1.70 (range 0.82-4.80). At last follow-up (median 2.75 years, range 0.58-3.92), a reduction in the number of relapses per year to 0.26 (range 0-2.18) was noted, despite cessation or lowering the dose of immunosuppressive therapy. Four patients achieved complete remission after the first administration of RTX, four more patients after subsequent doses of RTX. No severe adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

RTX was an effective and safe therapeutic option in our cohort of children with difficult-to-treat SDNS, resulting in a significant reduction of yearly relapses in the absence of severe adverse events and facilitating the reduction of other immunosuppressive medication.

Rituximab for nephrotic syndrome in children

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. At least 20 % of children with this syndrome show frequent relapses and/or steroid dependence during or after immunosuppressive therapies, a condition defined as complicated frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). Approximately 1-3 % of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome are resistant to steroids and all immunosuppressive agents, a condition defined as refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS); these SRNS children have a high risk of end-stage renal failure. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS and refractory SRNS. This review describes the recent results of rituximab treatment applied to pediatric nephrotic syndrome, as well as those of our recent study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab for childhood-onset complicated FRNS/SDNS (RCRNS01). The overall efficacy and safety of rituximab for this disease are discussed.

Randomised controlled trial comparing ofatumumab to rituximab in children with steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Oral steroids induce remission in about 90% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), which is characterised by severe proteinuria and hypoalbuminaemia. Some children become steroid-dependent (SD) and require addition of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to maintain remission. Since these oral agents are toxic, alternative interventions are needed for long-term treatment. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has shown promising steroid-sparing properties in clinical trials, but benefits are less convincing in complicated forms of SD-INS. Ofatumumab, a new anti-CD20 antibody with stronger affinity to CD20, may be superior to rituximab in maintaining oral steroid-free and CNI-free disease remission in children with SD-INS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open-label, two-parallel-arm, controlled, phase II randomised clinical trial will enrol children with SD-INS maintained in remission with oral steroids and CNI. Children will be randomised to either ofatumumab or rituximab infusion. After infusion of either antibody, steroids will be maintained for 30 days and then tapered off by 0.3 mg/kg/week until complete withdrawal. 1 week after complete steroid withdrawal, CNI will be decreased by 50% and withdrawn within 2 additional weeks. We will enrol 140 children to detect as significant at the 2-sided p value of 0.01 with a power of >0.8, a reduction in the risk of 1-year relapse (primary end point) of at least 0.3 (ie, from 0.65 to 0.35; (risk ratio 0.54)) in the ofatumumab arm when compared with the rituximab arm. We will compare the amount of steroids required to maintain complete disease remission at 6 and 24 months, relapse-free period, relapse rate per year as secondary end points. Circulating cell populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of the anti-CD20 response.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial received ethics approval from the local ethics board. We will publish study results and present them at international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT02394119; 2015-000624-28; Pre-results.

Rituximab in Minimal Change Disease: Mechanisms of Action and Hypotheses for Future Studies

Treatment with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-lymphocyte surface protein CD20, leads to the depletion of B cells. Recently, rituximab was reported to effectively prevent relapses of glucocorticoid-dependent or frequently relapsing minimal change disease (MCD). MCD is thought to be T-cell mediated; how rituximab controls MCD is not understood. In this review, we summarize key clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy of rituximab in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, mainly MCD. We then discuss immunological features of this disease and potential mechanisms of action of rituximab in its treatment based on what is known about the therapeutic action of rituximab in other immune-mediated disorders. We believe that studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of action of rituximab in MCD will provide a novel approach to resolve the elusive immune pathophysiology of MCD.

Efficacy of leflunomide combined with prednisone in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) and prednisone on refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS).

METHODS

A total of 52 patients with RNS were treated for 24 weeks between 2010 and 2014 in our hospital. In the treated group, 26 patients were treated with LEF and prednisone, and, in the control group, 26 patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and prednisone. During the treatment, 24 h urinary protein excretion and the serum levels of albumin and cholesterol, and kidney function were assayed before and after the therapy. Adverse reactions during treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

In the LEF group, the medication was markedly effective in eight cases and effective in nine cases; the total efficacy rate was 65.30%. In the CTX group, the treatment was markedly effective in six cases and effective in nine cases; the total efficacy rate was 57%. There were no significant differences between the results of the total efficacy rate (p > .05). The 24 h urinary protein excretion and serum cholesterol levels in both groups decreased after therapy and the serum levels of albumin in both groups increased after therapy. There were significant differences between the results for the 24 h urinary protein excretion, serum levels of albumin and cholesterol in the two groups (p < .05). The treatments were well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

LEF combined with prednisone has a certain efficacy on the RNS and displays few adverse reactions. A large-sample, randomized double-blind controlled study and long-term follow-up are needed to verify the efficacy of LEF combined with prednisone.

Efficacy of rituximab therapy against intractable steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Some cases of childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are intractable. We examined the cases of three patients with SRNS resistant to various treatment, but who achieved complete remission after being treated with rituximab (RTX) followed by methylprednisolone pulse (MP) therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all new-onset SRNS in the period from January 1997 to December 2013 was performed. Three of the 13 patients who received conventional treatment continued to have NS for >6 months, despite also being treated with immunosuppressants and receiving frequent albumin treatment. In addition, two of the patients received plasma exchange therapy, but it was ineffective. Therefore, RTX was used once a week for 4 weeks, followed by several courses of MP therapy.

RESULTS

Two of the three intractable SRNS patients achieved complete remission after treatment with RTX followed by MP therapy, and the remaining patient achieved incomplete remission after the first round of this treatment. That patient subsequently achieved complete remission after the second round of the treatment. RTX did not cause any serious side-effects, and all three patients had normal renal function at the final observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete remission was achieved in all 13 SRNS patients. RTX followed by MP therapy might be effective against SRNS refractory to conventional treatments and requiring frequent albumin treatment. Prospective clinical study examining the effectiveness and safety of this approach is required.

Single dose of rituximab in children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome

Rituximab (RTX) can be used in children with nephrotic syndrome, particularly in those with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, at present there is no unified standard of how to use RTX, with regard to the amount of doses and frequency, in children with nephrotic syndrome. The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of a single dose of RTX in children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (SD-MCNS). The patients with biopsy-proven minimal change disease (MCD) and clinical features of SDNS received a single dose of RTX (375 mg/m²). The toxicity and side effects of RTX were also observed. The study included 19 patients (10 males and 9 females). Follow-up of the patients was 1-50 months (28.1±16.6 months). B-cell depletion was achieved with RTX infusion (CD20<0.5%) and lasted 1-6 months (mean, 2.92±1.57 months). During follow-up, 10 patients remained in complete remission and did not relapse without administration of oral steroids or immunosuppressants for 4-50 months (mean, 30.1±12.6 months), despite recovery of the B-cell count. Nine patients relapsed in the process of reducing steroids, thus, treatment was maintained at a lower dosage (T=0, P<0.05) than prior to use of RTX. The number of relapses also decreased significantly (T=95, P<0.05). Five of the patients relapsed after stopping steroid for several months. At the end of follow-up, the efficacy of a single induction of RTX was 47.4% (9/19). There were no significant side effects associated with administration of RTX. In conclusion, RTX is a safe and effective alternative for children with SD-MCNS. RTX is an effective treatment for the rapid induction of remission and reduces relapse and steroid dependency. A single dose of RTX for children with SD-MCNS is recommended for rapid induction of remission, reduction of long-term steroid dosage, and decrease in the number of relapses, as it has few side effects.

Rituximab and low-dose cyclosporine combination therapy for steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the efficacy of rituximab and low-dose cyclosporine combination therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

METHODS

Five FSGS children with SRNS were treated twice with rituximab and low-dose cyclosporine (CyA) combination therapy (RTX-CyAT). The clinical features and laboratory data were investigated before and after RTX-CyAT, and the outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Prednisolone (PSL) was discontinued 3 months after RTX-CyAT in all patients. The number of CD19-positive cells decreased to <1% of all white blood cells in all patients at 1 month after RTX-CyAT, and was maintained at this level for 259.6 ± 68.2 days. All patients remained in remission for the duration of the decrease in CD19-positive cells to <1%. Two patients also remained in remission throughout the observation period, with three patients having a single relapse at 333 ± 89 days (range, 231-376 days) after RTX-CyAT. In all patients, the mean steroid and CyA doses after RTX-CyAT were lower than those before RTX-CyAT.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX-CyAT is effective in FSGS patients with SRNS and may ameliorate the side-effects of PSL and immunosuppressive drugs.

Risk factors for relapse and long-term outcome in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome treated with rituximab

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) is known to be effective for the treatment of refractory steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, there are insufficient data on the risk factors for relapse and long-term outcome after RTX treatment.

METHODS

We administered a single dose of RTX to patients with refractory SDNS from November 2007 to December 2013 and continued with immunosuppressants. The risk factors for early relapse and long-term outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included and the observation period was 13-90 months. Seventy-six patients (94 %) discontinued steroids. Median duration of B-cell depletion was 160 days and 50 % relapse-free survival was 482 days. In multivariate analyses, only a history of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) was a statistically significant risk factor (hazard ratio, 2.44; p = 0.048). Fifty percent relapse-free survival in patients without a history of SRNS was 615 days, longer than that of patients with a history of SRNS (393 days) (p=0.005) [corrected]. Fifty-one patients (63 %) received additional RTX treatments for relapses. At last observation, patients using calcineurin inhibitors decreased from 89 % to 23 %, and 12 patients (15 %) discontinued immunosuppressants.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab treatment followed by immunosuppressants is an effective option for patients with SDNS, although a history of SRNS is a risk factor for early relapse.

Anti-CD20 Antibodies for Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody originally licensed for lymphoma, is emerging as a novel steroid-sparing agent for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. The potential use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome has contributed to shifting the view of podocytopathies from T cell-mediated to more complex immunomediated disorders that can benefit from targeting B cells and other mediators of the early immune response. Clinical data on the use of rituximab also have implications on disease management and classification. In this review, we present results of clinical studies that support rituximab as an effective steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Recent randomized controlled trials suggest that potential benefits of rituximab therapy in steroid-dependent forms of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome vary depending on whether children are dependent on steroids alone or on both steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, with greater probabilities to achieve drug-free remission in the former group. Multiple-drug dependence may identify a different disease state with different prognosis and treatment options. Insufficient data are available on optimal use of rituximab as a maintenance steroid-sparing agent in these steroid-sensitive forms of the disease, including how often and for how long rituximab infusions should be repeated to maximize expected benefits and minimize potential harms. Finally, one randomized controlled trial in children with steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome yielded negative results. New anti-CD20 antibodies are under study in this patient population.

Rituximab Treatment for Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

In the past 10 years, many reports have suggested that rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is effective for children with complicated, frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, those reports were case reports, case series, retrospective surveys, and single-arm or short-term trials. Therefore, well-designed controlled trials are required to establish the value of rituximab in this condition. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out by the Research Group of Childhood-onset Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome (RCRNS) in Japan (RCRNS01). RCRNS01 showed that rituximab is safe and effective for the treatment of childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS. In 2014, the use of rituximab for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS was approved, first in the world, by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

The efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome: a meta-analysis

Rituximab is considered to be a promising drug for treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment compared with other immunosuppressive agents in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome. Three randomized controlled trials and two comparative control studies were included in our analysis. The included studies were of moderately high quality. Compared with other immunotherapies, rituximab therapy significantly improved relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.92, P = 0.03). Rituximab also achieved a higher rate of complete remission (risk ratio,1.62; 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.84, P = 0.09) and reduced the occurrence of proteinuria (mean difference = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.29 to −0.21, P < 0.00001); however, a more targeted rituximab treatment did not significantly increase serum albumin levels and did not significantly reduce adverse events. Rituximab might be a promising treatment for childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome; however, the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of rituximab treatment were not fully assessed, and there were limited studies that evaluated the clinical benefits of a concurrent infusion of rituximab plus a steroid compared with an infusion of rituximab only. Additional studies are required to address these issues.

Uso de rituximab en pacientes pediátricos con síndrome nefrótico córtico-resistente. Experiencia de un centro

Introducción: los esteroides son el tratamiento de elección del síndrome nefrótico con tasas de éxito hasta del 90%. En pacientes que no responden adecuadamente a ellos, se han usado diferentes esquemas de inmunosupresión. Objetivo y métodos: describir la respuesta terapéutica en un grupo de siete niños con síndrome nefrótico córtico-dependiente (SNCD) o córtico-resistente (SNCR) que recibieron tratamiento con rituximab y micofenolato mofetil en un hospital universitario de la ciudad de Medellín durante los años 2010-2012. Resultados: dos pacientes tenían SNCD y cinco, SNCR; la mediana de edad en el momento del diagnóstico fue de 2 años (p25-75: 1-5); seis meses después de la aplicación del rituximab se encontró disminución de la proteinuria en el 93% de los pacientes; los esteroides se lograron suspender en el 100%; además, disminuyó el número de recaídas; sin embargo, la proteinuria reapareció un año después de dicho tratamiento. Conclusión: con el rituximab disminuyen la proteinuria y la dosis de esteroides, pero la enfermedad recurre 12 meses después de usarlo. Se sugiere hacer otro estudio evaluando el efecto de una segunda dosis de rituximab al año de la primera.  .

Refractory focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the adult: complete and sustained remissions of two episodes of nephrotic syndrome after a single dose of rituximab

Rituximab therapy may achieve remission of proteinuria in children or adolescents with refractory focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), but its effectiveness in adults is uncertain. We describe the case of a 22-year-old Caucasian woman with refractory FSGS that achieved complete and sustained remission of nephrotic syndrome (NS) with one single 375 mg/m(2) rituximab infusion. At 4 months after complete circulating B-cell depletion, proteinuria declined from 4.5 to 0.27 g/24 h and serum albumin normalised. Rituximab was well tolerated and allowed complete withdrawal of previous immunosuppression with steroids and azathioprine. The patient was in sustained remission up to month 32, when she experienced a relapse. A second infusion of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) achieved prompt proteinuria reduction with no additional immunosuppressants. At 48 months after the initial treatment, this patient is in complete remission without any immunosuppression. This case suggests that rituximab, even a single dose, may safely promote NS remission in adults with refractory FSGS.

Is rituximab effective in childhood nephrotic syndrome? Yes and no

The idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (i.e. MCNS and FSGS) in children has been regarded as a disorder of T-cell function. Recent studies, however, also describe abnormalities of B-cell function. This supports the use of B-cell modulating treatment for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), especially rituximab, which has been used in other glomerular disorders as well. Many studies indicate that rituximab is effective in steroid-sensitive and -dependent nephrotic syndrome, by either inducing long-term remission or reducing relapses. In most series, children with primary (and recurrent) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) do not respond as well. The exact mechanisms of action of rituximab (as well as those of the other treatment options) in INS are as yet unclear. In addition to hosting mechanisms a direct stabilizing effect on the podocyte may also be of relevance, especially in FSGS. Although results are encouraging especially in steroid-sensitive patients, further studies on the clinical use of rituximab and the short- and long-term immunological effects and side-effects are necessary.

Rituximab-associated agranulocytosis in children with refractory idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: case series and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Agranulocytosis has been reported as a delayed-onset complication of rituximab treatment. However, the exact incidence and risk factors of this complication in patients with nephrotic syndrome remain unknown.

METHODS

Records of 213 rituximab treatments for 114 patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome between February 2006 and April 2013 were reviewed to identify episodes of agranulocytosis (defined as an absolute neutrophil count of <500 mm(3)).

RESULTS

Eleven episodes of agranulocytosis were detected in 11 patients. Median time of onset of agranulocytosis was 66 days (range, 54-161 days) after rituximab treatment. Nine patients experienced acute infections and received antibiotics. All but one patient received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Agranulocytosis resolved in all cases within a median of 3 days. The incidence of agranulocytosis was 9.6% in total patients and 5.2% in all treatments. Median age of the 11 patients who developed agranulocytosis was 6.4 years at the first rituximab treatment, significantly younger than the median age of the 103 patients who did not (median, 12.5 years; P = 0.0009). Five patients received re-treatment with rituximab. No recurrence of agranulocytosis was observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to pay extra attention to this clinically serious delayed-onset complication as it may be accompanied by life-threatening infections such as sepsis. Further clinical studies are needed to clarify its pathogenesis.

Rituximab in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: does it make sense?

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) includes three different entities: minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Historically, this condition has been attributed to a T-cell disorder resulting in the secretion of a circulating factor that increases glomerular permeability to plasma proteins. The therapeutic approach to control the proteinuria of INS remains the use of drugs that have been considered to suppress the production of the "circulating factor" secreted by T cells. Recently, rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 cell surface receptor expressed on B cells, has emerged as potential therapeutic agent. The number of publications reporting clinical experience with RTX in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome has greatly increased in the last few years. However, there is currently no good evidence from clinical or experimental studies that support a role of RTX in the treatment of MCD and FSGS proteinuria. In summary, there is the need for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the proteinuria in INS and the potential role of RTX in this condition.

Rituximab treatment combined with methylprednisolone pulse therapy and immunosuppressants for childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) with/without intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) constitute the standard treatment for childhood-onset, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). However, some patients fail to achieve remission. We treated SRNS patients resistant to CIs and MPT with additional rituximab combined with MPT and immunosuppressive agents.

METHODS

Ten patients (aged 2-14 years) with CI- and MPT-resistant SRNS were enrolled. Patients were administered rituximab (1-4 doses; 375 mg/m(2)) followed by MPT (30 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone for 3 consecutive days) once every 2-4 weeks until complete remission (CR). We analyzed clinical outcome and safety.

RESULTS

Six patients received a single dose of rituximab, 2 received two doses, and 2 received four doses. Seven patients achieved CR, 1 achieved partial remission, and 2 showed no response. Although 2 patients with no response progressed to end-stage renal failure, 7 patients with CR preserved normal renal function without proteinuria at the last observation. There were two serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional rituximab combined with conventional MPT and immunosuppressive agents is a promising option for overcoming refractory SRNS. Aggressive B cell suppression by rituximab may ameliorate resistance to conventional treatments and a cocktail of other immunosuppressive agents, such as CIs, MMF, mizoribine, may be beneficial. However, as intense immunosuppression may cause serious adverse events, further evaluation is necessary.