Rituximab treatment combined with methylprednisolone pulse therapy and immunosuppressants for childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Efficacy of rituximab and risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with childhood-onset steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of rituximab in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is controversial. We previously reported that rituximab in combination with methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) and immunosuppressants was associated with favorable outcomes. We determined risk factors for poor response following rituximab treatment, which remains unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 45 patients with childhood-onset SRNS treated with rituximab across four pediatric kidney facilities. Treatment effects were categorized as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and no remission (NR) at one year after rituximab treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of CR, PR, and NR. Risk factors for non-CR were calculated with multivariate logistic regression. Adverse events and the relationship between disease status at one year and long-term prognosis were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The rates of CR, PR, and NR at one year were 69%, 24%, and 7%, respectively. The median time from rituximab administration to CR was 90 days. The median follow-up period after rituximab administration was 7.4 years. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for poor response were the pathologic finding of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis and a long interval between SRNS diagnosis and rituximab administration. The rates of CR were 90.3% and 21.4% in patients receiving rituximab within and after 6 months following SRNS diagnosis, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients developed chronic kidney disease stage G5, including 2 of the 11 patients with PR and all 3 patients with NR, whereas none of the 31 patients with CR developed chronic kidney disease stage G5.

CONCLUSION

Early administration of rituximab in combination with MPT and immunosuppressants might achieve favorable outcomes in patients with SRNS.

Rituximab in combination with cyclosporine and steroid pulse therapy for childhood-onset multidrug-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter single-arm clinical trial (JSKDC11 trial)

BACKGROUND

Only 80% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond well to glucocorticoid therapy. Multidrug-resistant nephrotic syndrome (MRNS) is associated with a poor kidney prognosis. Several retrospective studies have identified rituximab as an effective treatment for MRNS; however, prospective studies are required to assess its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, non-blinded, single-arm trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with childhood-onset MRNS who were resistant to cyclosporine and more than three courses of steroid pulse therapy. The enrolled patients received four 375 mg/m2 doses of rituximab in combination with baseline cyclosporine and steroid pulse therapy. The primary endpoint was a > 50% reduction in the urinary protein/creatinine ratio from baseline on day 169. Complete and partial remissions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Six patients with childhood-onset MRNS were enrolled. All patients were negative for pathogenic variants of podocyte-related genes. On day 169, five patients (83.3%) showed a > 50% reduction in the urinary protein/creatinine ratio, two patients showed partial remission, and two patients showed complete remission. No deaths occurred and severe adverse events occurred in two patients (infection in one patient and acute kidney injury in one patient). Three patients needed treatment for moderate-to-severe infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The study treatment effectively reduced the urinary protein/creatinine ratio in patients with childhood-onset MRNS. The adverse events in this study were within the expected range; however, attention should be paid to the occurrence of infections.

Use of Rituximab in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Rituximab is an established therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to sustain short- to medium-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. Recent trials focus on its use as a first-line agent among those with milder disease severity. Rituximab is used in multidrug refractory nephrotic syndrome and post-transplant disease recurrence, although the evidence is much less substantial. Available data suggest that the treatment response to rituximab depends on various patient factors, dosing regimen, and the concomitant use of maintenance immunosuppression. After repeated treatments, patients are found to have an improving response overall with a longer relapse-free period. The drug effect, however, is not permanent, and 80% of patients eventually relapse and many will require an additional course of rituximab. This underpins the importance of understanding the long-term safety profile on repeated treatments. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are concerns about long-term hypogammaglobulinemia, especially in young children. Reliable immunophenotyping and biomarkers are yet to be discovered to predict treatment success, risk of both rare and severe side effects, e.g. , persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and guiding of redosing strategy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of rituximab for childhood nephrotic syndrome and how the therapeutic landscape is evolving.

Tedavisi zor nefrotik sendromlu çocuklarda rituksimab tedavisi

Amaç: Rituksimab (RTX), tedavisi zor nefrotik sendromlu (sık tekrarlayan, steroide bağımlı ve steroide dirençli) hastalar için kurtarma tedavisi olarak önerilmektedir. Amacımız zor nefrotik sendromlu çocuklarda RTX tedavisinin etkinliğini ve uzun dönem sonuçlarını değerlendirmek ve deneyimlerimizi paylaşmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: RTX ile tedavi edilen zor nefrotik sendromlu çocukların tıbbi kayıtları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Oniki ayda nükssüz sağkalım oranı ve B hücre deplesyonun izlemi değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 8'i steroide bağımlı (SBNS), 6'sı sık tekrarlayan (STNS) ve 6'sı steroide dirençli nefrotik sendromlu (SDNS) 20 çocuk dahil edildi. RTX tedavisi alan STNS/SBNS hastalarının tedavi öncesi ve sonrası 1 yıllık ortalama nüks sayısı karşılaştırıldı. Ortalama nüks sayısı 2 (1-4)’den 0 (0-1) kez/yıla geriledi. RTX tedavisi sonrası ortalama takip süresi 23 ay (12-59) ve 8 hastada nüks gelişti. RTX tedavisi sonrası nüks eden 5 hastaya, tekrarlayan dozlarda RTX uygulandı. Bu hastalarda, CD19+B hücreleri remisyon sırasında yeniden ortaya çıkarken, hafıza B hücrelerinin deplesyonu devam etti. Sonuç: RTX tedavisi, STNS/SBNS hastalarında remisyon süresini uzattı, ancak SDNS hastalarında etkisiz kaldı. Bu hastalarda remisyonun idamesi için RTX dozunun tekrarlanabileceği ve tekrarlama dozlarının zamanlamasında en iyi hafıza B hücre sayısının yardımcı olabileceği saptandı.

Risks and renal outcomes of severe acute kidney injury in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Risks and renal outcomes of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), particularly those who require dialysis, have not been fully explored.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled children who had been diagnosed with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at the National Center for Child Health and Development between March 2002 and December 2018. Children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome or SRNS-related gene mutations were excluded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two children with SRNS (37 boys; median age, 3.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0-10.3]) were enrolled. Sixteen patients (25.8%) had severe AKI, including nine patients (14.5%) who received dialysis. The period from nephrotic syndrome (NS) onset to partial remission (median [IQR]) was not significantly influenced by dialysis status, but tended to be longer in the dialysis group (125 days [74-225] vs. 40 days [28-113]; p = 0.09); notably, no patient developed chronic kidney disease during the follow-up period. Infection and posterior reversible encephalopathy (PRES) were significantly associated with AKI. Patients with AKI tended to require dialysis in the presence of infection, undergo treatment with cyclosporine A, and have PRES. The period from onset of NS to AKI was significantly longer in the dialysis group (26 days [15.5-46.0] vs. 4 days [0.0-14.0]; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Dialysis was commonly required among children with SRNS who exhibited severe AKI. The period from onset of NS to partial remission tended to be longer in patients receiving dialysis, whereas renal prognosis was satisfactory during subsequent follow-up.

Efficacy of rituximab therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome: a 10-year experience from an Iranian pediatric hospital

Background

There are controversy results in the optimal management of children with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SDNS, SRNS). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in these pediatric patients.

Methods

Medical records of 1–18-year-old Iranian children with SDNS (n = 26) and SRNS (n = 22) with a follow-up for at least 24 months were included from 2009 to 2019. The short- and long-term responses to RTX were respectively evaluated to determine the random protein-to-creatinine ratio after 6 and 24 months and classified as complete (CR) and partial (PR) remission or no response.

Results

Male patients (n = 26) were slightly predominate. The median age of patients at the time of RTX therapy was 8.6 ± 4.01 years. At the end of the 6-month follow-up, CR and PR occurred in 23 (47.9%) and 12 (25%) patients, respectively. Of 23 patients with CR, 18 (69.2%) and 5(22.7%) had SDNS and SRNS, respectively (p < 0.005). However, only 18 (37.5%) of patients after 24 months had been in CR. No significant difference in the CR rate was found between the two groups. RTX was more effective when administered during the proteinuria-free period (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In the short term, RTX significantly was efficient in inducing complete or PR in SDNS and SRNS patients. However, the favorable response rate in a long-term follow-up was insignificantly lower between the two groups.

Association between Immunoglobulin M and Steroid Resistance in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in Japan

Background

The prognosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children is poorer than steroid-sensitive cases. Diagnosis of SRNS is made after observing the response to the initial 4-week corticosteroid therapy, which might be accompanied by side effects. However, predictive indicators at initial diagnosis remain unknown. We aimed to investigate whether selectivity index (SI) and other indicators at initial diagnosis-for example, serum IgM and total serum protein-albumin ratio (TA ratio, total serum protein level over albumin level)-can predict SRNS.

Methods

A total of 80 children were enrolled from seven hospitals in Japan between January 2008 and December 2019 (mean age, 4.7 years; 65% male). Of the children enrolled, 13 (16%, M/F=5:8) had been diagnosed as steroid resistant after initial treatment with steroids. The association between serum IgM (tertile categories: low, 24-133; middle, 134-169; and high, 169.1-510 mg/dl), SI (<0.2 or ≥0.2), and TA ratio (tertile categories: low, 1.8-2.6; middle, 2.62-3.75; and high, 3.8-15.3) at initial diagnosis and steroid resistance was evaluated with logistic regression, adjusting for age and sex.

Results

Low levels of serum IgM were significantly associated with steroid resistance (adjusted odds ratio, 6.94; 95% CI, 1.12 to 43.11). TA ratio and SI were not significantly associated with steroid resistance.

Conclusions

Low levels of serum IgM at initial diagnosis might predict steroid resistance among Japanese children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

Response to First Course of Intensified Immunosuppression in Genetically Stratified Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intensified immunosuppression in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome is broadly applied, with disparate outcomes. This review of patients from the United Kingdom National Study of Nephrotic Syndrome cohort aimed to improve disease stratification by determining, in comprehensively genetically screened patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, if there is an association between response to initial intensified immunosuppression and disease progression and/or post-transplant recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Pediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome were recruited via the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases. All patients were whole-genome sequenced, whole-exome sequenced, or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome gene-panel sequenced. Complete response or partial response within 6 months of starting intensified immunosuppression was ascertained using laboratory data. Response to intensified immunosuppression and outcomes were analyzed according to genetic testing results, pattern of steroid resistance, and first biopsy findings.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients, 178 (92 males, median onset age 4.7 years) received intensified immunosuppression with response available. A total of 4% of patients with monogenic disease showed complete response, compared with 25% of genetic-testing-negative patients (P=0.02). None of the former recurred post-transplantation. In genetic-testing-negative patients, 97% with complete response to first intensified immunosuppression did not progress, whereas 44% of nonresponders developed kidney failure with 73% recurrence post-transplant. Secondary steroid resistance had a higher complete response rate than primary/presumed resistance (43% versus 23%; P=0.001). The highest complete response rate in secondary steroid resistance was to rituximab (64%). Biopsy results showed no correlation with intensified immunosuppression response or outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with monogenic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome had a poor therapeutic response and no post-transplant recurrence. In genetic-testing-negative patients, there was an association between response to first intensified immunosuppression and long-term outcome. Patients with complete response rarely progressed to kidney failure, whereas nonresponders had poor kidney survival and a high post-transplant recurrence rate. Patients with secondary steroid resistance were more likely to respond, particularly to rituximab.

Rituximab therapy for refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

Patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) who develop resistance to immunosuppressive agents, defined as refractory SRNS, have poor renal outcomes. Although the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has shown efficacy for frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, its efficacy for refractory SRNS remains uncertain due to limited data. According to previous case reports, 50.4% of patients with refractory SRNS showed clinical improvements after rituximab treatment. Remission rates in patients with initial steroid resistance and late steroid resistance were 43.9 and 57.7%, respectively, and 41.5 and 63.6% in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minor glomerular abnormalities, respectively. However, various factors (race, disease severity, number of rituximab doses, concomitant treatments, and observation period) differed among these observational studies and their consensus may also have been affected by potential publication bias. Rituximab monotherapy may have some degree of efficacy and lead to satisfactory outcomes in a subset of patients with refractory SRNS. However, administration of concomitant treatments during rituximab-mediated B cell depletion, such as methylprednisolone pulse therapy, daily oral prednisolone therapy, and immunosuppressive agents, may lead to better outcomes in these patients. Large-scale, multi-center prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such regimens.

Treatment of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in the genomic era

The pathogenesis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is not completely known. Recent advances in genomics have elucidated some of the molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of the disease. More than 50 monogenic causes of SRNS have been identified; however, these genes are responsible for only a small fraction of SRNS in outbred populations. There are currently no guidelines for genetic testing in SRNS, but evidence from the literature suggests that testing should be guided by the genetic architecture of the disease in the population. Notably, most genetic forms of SRNS do not respond to current immunosuppressive therapies; however, a small subset of patients with monogenic SRNS will achieve partial or complete remission with specific immunomodulatory agents, presumably due to non-immunosuppressive effects of these agents. We suggest a pragmatic approach to the therapy of genetic SRNS, as there is no evidence-based algorithm for the management of the disease.

Long-term outcomes after early treatment with rituximab for Japanese children with cyclosporine- and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Although rituximab (RTX) may be effective treatment in children with nephrotic syndrome who are resistant to cyclosporine A and steroid (CsA-SRNS), long-term outcomes after B cell depleting therapy remain unclear.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses (median follow-up, 5.1 years) of six CsA-SRNS children (three boys; median age at RTX, 4.2 years) unresponsive to oral cyclosporine combined with ≥ 2 courses of intravenous methylprednisolone pulses, who received RTX within 6 months after disease onset (median 11 weeks). After initial RTX treatment (median two doses of 375 mg/m²) followed by retreatment with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses and/or high-dose prednisolone, all patients achieved complete remission at a median of 158 days. Although 17 relapses occurred in five patients during follow-up, all but one patient became steroid sensitive. Severe neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia developed in two and four patients, respectively. However, no life-threatening infections were identified in the cohort. At last visit (median age, 11.3 years), all patients maintained complete remission without renal insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Although late-onset adverse events should be considered, particularly for young patients, early RTX treatment may have positive outcomes in children with CsA-SRNS in the long term.

Rituximab Use in the Management of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome

Childhood nephrotic syndrome is a challenging and often persistent renal disorder, and its incidence varies between different ethnicities and regions. Corticosteroids have been the main treatment for decades and are effective in most children with idiopathic NS, although 10-15% of these children become steroid resistant. Furthermore, some initially steroid sensitive children follow a steroid dependent or frequently relapsing course and are therefore at increased risk for developing steroid toxicity. In such children, alternative immunosuppressive medications are used to induce and/or maintain remission of NS. One such drug, rituximab, is a monoclonal antibody directed against the B lymphocyte CD20 marker which induces depletion of B cells, and has shown promising results in the management of NS in children. In this review, we summarize recent studies on the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the different types of childhood nephrotic syndrome, the known and potential mechanisms of action of rituximab, its possible complications and side effects, and the available and potential biomarkers of rituximab activity.

Difficult-to-treat idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: established drugs, open questions and future options

The idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood can be classified according to the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC) based on the response to steroids. Typically, steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is characterised by minimal changes in disease (MCD) histology, whereas in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most prevalent lesion. Patients with SSNS may develop frequent relapses and/or steroid dependency, which can be difficult to treat. New studies confirm the value of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and mycophenolic acid in preventing relapses of SSNS. Rituximab also plays an important role, but many questions regarding initial dosing, repetitions of courses, and long-term side effects remain unclear. SRNS, especially when unresponsive to treatment, can lead to chronic kidney disease. In particular, treatment with CNIs has improved the prognosis and recent data indicate that treatment can even be discontinued in many patients with full remission. In CNI-unresponsive SRNS, rituximab is less effective than in SSNS and the role of other biologicals (such as ofatumumab, abatacept, and others) remains unclear. A significant proportion of children with FSGS have genetic causes and most patients do not respond to immunosuppression, although individual patients with partial and even complete response have been documented. Future studies should evaluate treatments leading to long-term remission without maintenance immunosuppression in SSNS; in both genetic and immune-mediated SRNS, novel options to decrease the number of treatment-unresponsive patients seem mandatory, as they are at a high risk of developing end-stage renal disease.

Efficacy of Rituximab vs Tacrolimus in Pediatric Corticosteroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Calcineurin inhibitors are an established first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with corticosteroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (CDNS), whereas B-lymphocyte-depleting therapy is mostly used as a rescue for calcineurin inhibitor-resistant cases. The positive efficacy and safety profile of rituximab raises the question of whether it could be used as a first-line alternative to calcineurin inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of rituximab and tacrolimus in maintaining relapse-free survival among children with CDNS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A parallel-arm, open-label, randomized clinical trial was performed from May 8, 2015, to September 20, 2016, with 1-year follow-up in a single-center, tertiary care unit. A total of 176 consecutive children aged 3 to 16 years with CDNS not previously treated with corticosteroid-sparing agents were screened for eligibility.

INTERVENTIONS

The children received either tacrolimus (along with tapering alternate-day prednisolone) for 12 months or a single course of rituximab (2 infusions of 375 mg/m2).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Twelve-month relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Of the 176 children screened for eligibility, 120 were randomized and all but 3 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. The groups were comparable, with mean (SD) age of 7.2 (2.8) years, 32 boys (53.3%) in each group, mean (SD) disease duration of 2.5 (1.5) years and 2.3 (1.7) in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively, disease duration less than 1 year among 15 children (25.0%) in each group, median (interquartile range) of 4 (3-5) relapses in each group, and mean (SD) cumulative prednisolone dose of 246 (48) mg/kg and 239 (52) mg/kg in the prestudy year in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively. Rituximab therapy was associated with a higher 12-month relapse-free survival rate than tacrolimus (54 [90.0%] vs 38 [63.3%] children; P < .001; odds ratio, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.93-14.07). Among the patients who experienced relapse, median time to first relapse was 40 weeks in the rituximab group and 29 weeks in the tacrolimus group. Only 2 patients in the rituximab group had more than 1 relapse during the study period compared with 10 patients in the tacrolimus group. The cumulative corticosteroid dose during the 12-month study period was lower with rituximab compared with tacrolimus (mean [SD], 25.8 [27.8] vs 86.3 [58.0] mg/kg). Although both treatments were well tolerated, mild to moderate infections were twice as common in the tacrolimus group (26 [43.3%] vs 13 [21.7%] events).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In children with CDNS, rituximab appears to be more effective than tacrolimus in maintaining disease remission and minimizing corticosteroid exposure and, given its good tolerability and lack of nephrotoxic effects, may be considered as first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02438982; Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2014/01/004355.

Rituximab in The Management of Pediatric Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome was performed. Data from studies, performed before April 2017 were collected, from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational studies with a minimal sample size of 5 patients, regarding treatment with rituximab in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Independent extraction of articles by 2 investigators using predefined data fields was performed.

RESULTS

We included 7 case series and 1 open-label randomized controlled trial. Among them, 3 studies were multicenter. A total of 226 patients were included. Mean age at onset was 5.6 ± 1.1 years. Mean number of rituximab administrations was 3.1 ± 1.1 infusions per patient. Remission was observed in 89 patients (46.4%). Remission was seen in 40.8% patients with initial steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 52.8% patients with late steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Good initial response to rituximab therapy was observed in 63.2% patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome, 39.2% patients with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, 1 patient had diffuse mesangial hypercellularity, and 1 patient had IgM nephropathy. Sustained remission ranged from 18% to 93.7%. Five serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab exhibited a satisfactory profile regarding efficacy and safety indicating that this agent is a promising therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and should be further investigated by randomized clinical trials.

Successful treatment of rituximab- and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome with leukocytapheresis

Although rituximab (RTX) is a promising therapeutic agent for treating steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) resistant to various immunosuppressive agents, some patients have shown resistance to RTX. We report the case of a patient with RTX-resistant nephrotic syndrome and SRNS who was successfully treated with leukocytapheresis (LCAP). After LCAP, there was a significant reduction in proteinuria and in the total number of lymphocytes, T cells, and HLA-DR^+- activated T cells. Moreover, the patient became sensitive to steroids and RTX. LCAP reduced circulating immune cells including activated T cells and could be effective in treating rituximab-resistant nephrotic syndrome and SRNS and in achieving remission of proteinuria.

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a persistent challenge for pediatric nephrology

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome remains a challenge to treat, but various efforts are underway to better understand the pathogenesis and improve patient outcomes. This review provides an update on the newer advances in understanding the molecular etiologies for a variety of podocyte abnormalities, potential circulating factors that may initiate and sustain the steroid-resistant state, genetic mutations, and precision medicine treatment modalities in this continuously perplexing disorder.

Rituximab for nephrotic syndrome in children

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. At least 20 % of children with this syndrome show frequent relapses and/or steroid dependence during or after immunosuppressive therapies, a condition defined as complicated frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). Approximately 1-3 % of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome are resistant to steroids and all immunosuppressive agents, a condition defined as refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS); these SRNS children have a high risk of end-stage renal failure. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS and refractory SRNS. This review describes the recent results of rituximab treatment applied to pediatric nephrotic syndrome, as well as those of our recent study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab for childhood-onset complicated FRNS/SDNS (RCRNS01). The overall efficacy and safety of rituximab for this disease are discussed.

Rituximab in Minimal Change Disease: Mechanisms of Action and Hypotheses for Future Studies

Treatment with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-lymphocyte surface protein CD20, leads to the depletion of B cells. Recently, rituximab was reported to effectively prevent relapses of glucocorticoid-dependent or frequently relapsing minimal change disease (MCD). MCD is thought to be T-cell mediated; how rituximab controls MCD is not understood. In this review, we summarize key clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy of rituximab in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, mainly MCD. We then discuss immunological features of this disease and potential mechanisms of action of rituximab in its treatment based on what is known about the therapeutic action of rituximab in other immune-mediated disorders. We believe that studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of action of rituximab in MCD will provide a novel approach to resolve the elusive immune pathophysiology of MCD.

Efficacy of rituximab therapy against intractable steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Some cases of childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are intractable. We examined the cases of three patients with SRNS resistant to various treatment, but who achieved complete remission after being treated with rituximab (RTX) followed by methylprednisolone pulse (MP) therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all new-onset SRNS in the period from January 1997 to December 2013 was performed. Three of the 13 patients who received conventional treatment continued to have NS for >6 months, despite also being treated with immunosuppressants and receiving frequent albumin treatment. In addition, two of the patients received plasma exchange therapy, but it was ineffective. Therefore, RTX was used once a week for 4 weeks, followed by several courses of MP therapy.

RESULTS

Two of the three intractable SRNS patients achieved complete remission after treatment with RTX followed by MP therapy, and the remaining patient achieved incomplete remission after the first round of this treatment. That patient subsequently achieved complete remission after the second round of the treatment. RTX did not cause any serious side-effects, and all three patients had normal renal function at the final observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete remission was achieved in all 13 SRNS patients. RTX followed by MP therapy might be effective against SRNS refractory to conventional treatments and requiring frequent albumin treatment. Prospective clinical study examining the effectiveness and safety of this approach is required.

Rituximab Treatment for Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

In the past 10 years, many reports have suggested that rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is effective for children with complicated, frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, those reports were case reports, case series, retrospective surveys, and single-arm or short-term trials. Therefore, well-designed controlled trials are required to establish the value of rituximab in this condition. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out by the Research Group of Childhood-onset Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome (RCRNS) in Japan (RCRNS01). RCRNS01 showed that rituximab is safe and effective for the treatment of childhood-onset, complicated FRNS/SDNS. In 2014, the use of rituximab for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS was approved, first in the world, by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

The efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome: a meta-analysis

Rituximab is considered to be a promising drug for treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment compared with other immunosuppressive agents in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome. Three randomized controlled trials and two comparative control studies were included in our analysis. The included studies were of moderately high quality. Compared with other immunotherapies, rituximab therapy significantly improved relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.92, P = 0.03). Rituximab also achieved a higher rate of complete remission (risk ratio,1.62; 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.84, P = 0.09) and reduced the occurrence of proteinuria (mean difference = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.29 to −0.21, P < 0.00001); however, a more targeted rituximab treatment did not significantly increase serum albumin levels and did not significantly reduce adverse events. Rituximab might be a promising treatment for childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome; however, the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of rituximab treatment were not fully assessed, and there were limited studies that evaluated the clinical benefits of a concurrent infusion of rituximab plus a steroid compared with an infusion of rituximab only. Additional studies are required to address these issues.

Back to the Future: Therapies for Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Background: Roughly 20-40% of individuals with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome will fail to respond to standard therapies and have a high risk of progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). In the last 50 years, no new therapies have been approved specifically for the treatment of these individuals with recalcitrant disease. Summary: Recent in vitro, translational, and clinical studies have identified novel targets and pathways that not only expand our understanding of the complex pathophysiology of proteinuric disease but also provide an opportunity to challenge the tradition of relying on histologic classification of nephrotic diseases to make treatment decisions. Key Messages: The traditional methods of directing the care of individuals with nephrotic syndrome by histological classification or deciding second line therapies on the basis of steroid-responsiveness may soon yield customizing therapies based on our expanding understanding of molecular targets. Important non-immunologic mechanisms of widely used immunosuppressive therapies may be just as important in palliating proteinuric disease as proposed immunologic functions.