The utility of surveillance biopsies in pediatric kidney transplantation

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Follow-up biopsies identify high rates of persistent rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients after treatment of T cell-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

Incomplete resolution of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after treatment may not be detected with serum creatinine monitoring and is associated with donor-specific antibodies and chronic rejection. We evaluate the utility of follow-up biopsies (FUB) to identify and characterize rates of persistent TCMR after treatment in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Patients from two pediatric transplant centers performing standard of care FUB at 1.5-2 months after treatment for TCMR were included. FUB were evaluated for extent of rejection resolution (complete vs. incomplete) and grade. Clinical data at time of FUB and later were reported, where available.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients underwent FUB, at mean of 1.7 months (SD 0.7) post-index biopsy. Rejection grade on index biopsy was Banff borderline (≥i1t1 and

CONCLUSIONS

FUB were effective at detecting persistent rejection, which was common among pediatric transplant patients after standard TCMR treatment. Until more effective rejection treatments or sensitive biomarkers are available, FUB may be effectively utilized to identify patients with ongoing rejection who would benefit from further treatment.

Collapse

Key Words

• biopsy
• pediatric
• rejection

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Child
• Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects
• T-Lymphocytes
• Follow-Up Studies
• Biopsy
• Treatment Outcome
• Transplant Recipients
• Graft Rejection
• Kidney/pathology

Collapse

Grants

• R01 DK126807 NIDDK NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Adina Landsberg Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
S. Sikandar Raza Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
Michael E. Seifert Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
Tom D. Blydt-Hansen BC Children’s Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Collapse

Characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of neutropenia after liver or kidney transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

While prior adult studies have shown that approximately 20%-38% of subjects undergoing solid-organ transplant develop neutropenia, similar analyses in pediatric subjects are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of liver transplant (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients at our center during the period 2008-2018. All of the KT and none of the LT subjects during this time period had induction with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or basiliximab at time of transplant. Neutropenia was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value ≤1000/mm3 .

RESULTS

One hundred subjects with LT and 82 subjects with KT were included. The incidence of neutropenia within the first year of transplant in KT was higher compared to LT (54.8% vs 39%, p = .01). The median number of hospitalizations (p = .001) and infectious complications (p = .04) was significantly higher only in the KT subjects who developed neutropenia (compared to those who did not). Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with severity of liver disease at transplant, namely h/o upper gastrointestinal bleeding (p = .02), weight deficit (p = .01), and pre-LT ANC (p = .01), along with high or moderate risk cytomegalovirus status (p = .05) as predictors of neutropenia in LT subjects. Female gender (p = .03) predicted neutropenia, while BK virus infection was protective for neutropenia (p = .04) in KT subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of and morbidity associated with neutropenia within 1 year post-transplant is higher in KT subjects compared to LT subjects. The likely reason for this is the use of induction therapy (ATG, basiliximab) at the time of transplant in KT subjects.

Early surveillance biopsy utilization and management of pediatric renal allograft acute T cell-mediated rejection in Canadian centers: Observations from the PROBE multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early TCMR surveillance with protocol kidney biopsy is used differentially among pediatric kidney transplant centers. Little has been reported about actual center-based differences, and this variability may influence TCMR ascertainment, treatment, and monitoring more broadly.

METHODS

Data from the PROBE multicenter study were used to identify patients from centers conducting ESB or LSIB. ESB was defined as >50% of patients having at least 1 surveillance biopsy in the first 9 months. Patients were compared for number of biopsies, rejection episodes, treatment, and follow-up monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 261 biopsies were performed on 97 patients over 1-2 years of follow-up. A total of 228 (87%) of biopsies were performed in ESB centers. Compared to LSIB centers, ESB centers had 7-fold more episodes of TCMR diagnosed on any biopsy [0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.4; P < .001] and a 3-fold higher rate from indication biopsies [0.3 ± 0.9 vs 0.1 ± 0.3; P = .04]. The proportion of rejection treatment varied based on severity: Banff borderline i1t1 (40%);>i1t1 and < Banff 1A (86%); and ≥ Banff 1A (100%). Biopsies for follow-up were performed after treatment in 80% of cases (n = 28) of rejection almost exclusively at ESB centers, with 17 (61%) showing persistence of TCMR (≥i1t1).

CONCLUSIONS

Practice variation exists across Canadian pediatric renal transplant centers with ESB centers identifying more episodes of rejection. Additionally, treatment of Banff borderline is not universal and varies with severity regardless of center type. Lastly, follow-up biopsies are performed inconsistently and invariably show persistence of rejection.

Yield and utility of surveillance kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at various time points post-transplant

BACKGROUND

Due to a lack of consensus on SB for pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we evaluated the yield and clinical utility of SB findings at various time points post-transplant.

METHODS

Patients transplanted at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 with at least one SB at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplant were included. Additional biopsies were done for indication (IB). TCMR was classified by Banff criteria (score ≥i1t1).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients had 142 biopsies (SB = 113, IB = 29); 19 (40.4%) of whom experienced at least one TCMR episode in the first-year post-transplant. The greatest SB yield of any pathologic abnormality was at 6 months (57.1%; P < .001). Six months also had the highest yield for TCMR (42.9%), compared with 3.3%, 20.8%, 15.0%, and 9.1% at 1.5, 3, 12 months, and 24 months, respectively (P = .003). SB instigated intensification of immunosuppression (28.3% cases), reduction of immunosuppression (2.7% cases), and other non-immunosuppressant changes (1.8% cases). The 6-month SB led to the greatest number of changes in management (53.6%), compared with 1.5, 3, 12, and 24 months (13.3, 20.8, 25.0, and 36.4%, respectively; P = .012). There were no major biopsy-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SBs identify an important burden of subclinical rejection and other pathology leading to changes in clinical management. The greatest yield was at 6 months, whereas the least utility was at the 1.5 months. Selection of SB timing may be tailored such that the optimal yield is balanced against the procedural risk.

Characterizing the frequency of modifiable histological changes observed on surveillance biopsies in pediatric kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Rejection is responsible for just under 50% of graft loss in the pediatric kidney transplant population. Early identification and treatment of allograft injury, specifically modifiable pathologies such as subclinical rejection (SCR), calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and BK virus nephropathy, may improve allograft survival. Protocol surveillance biopsy (SB) currently offers the earliest opportunity for targeted interventions.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of 215 kidney SBs obtained from 2008 to 2016 in 97 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. SBs were obtained at 6, 12, and 24 months post-transplantation. Frequency of abnormal histologic findings, estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of SB, and SB-related complications were recorded. Data were analyzed to investigate possible time trends and the presence of demographic or clinical associations with abnormal histologic findings.

RESULTS

Potentially modifiable histologic findings were seen in 38.1% of all SBs. SCR was found with increasing frequency across all time points with an estimated 49% increase in the odds of a SCR finding per additional 6 months post-transplantation (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.09, p = 0.022). Among follow-up biopsies in patients who underwent treatment for SCR, 50% had no SCR and 18.8% showed histologic improvement. The complication rate associated with SB was 1.9% (4/215 SBs) and consisted of only minor complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SBs are safe and offer the opportunity to identify and treat modifiable histologic changes in the pediatric kidney transplant population. The performance of SBs for up to 2 years after transplantation can have meaningful clinical impact.

The role of protocol biopsies after pediatric kidney transplantation

Data on protocol biopsies (PBs) after pediatric kidney transplantation are rare.We evaluated 6-month post-transplantation renal function in 86 children after PB as observational study. Patients were divided into 3 groups:Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and delta GFR were determined.PBs 6 months post-kidney transplantation did not influence the clinical course in stable pediatric patients and are therefore of questionable value. Decreased kidney function may however be stabilized by therapeutic intervention according to results of PB.