Single infusion of low-dose ofatumumab in a child with complicated nephrotic syndrome with anti-rituximab antibodies

Obinutuzumab in Frequently Relapsing and Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

BACKGROUND

B-cell depletion with rituximab induces sustained remission in children with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. However, most patients relapse after B-cell recovery, and some patients do not achieve B-cell depletion. Obinutuzumab is a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody designed to overcome such situations in B-cell malignancies and was recently reported to be safe and effective in other autoimmune diseases affecting the kidneys.

METHODS

We retrospectively report 41 children with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome treated with a single low-dose infusion of obinutuzumab at Robert-Debre Hospital between April 2018 and December 2020. Participants were treated because of rituximab resistance or relapse after rituximab and received a single infusion of 300 mg/1.73 m 2 obinutuzumab with cessation of oral immunosuppressors within 2 months.

RESULTS

B-cell depletion was achieved in all participants and lasted a median of 8.3 months (interquartile range, 6.4-11.1), a duration exceeding that for last rituximab treatment. At 12 and 24 months, 92% (38/41) and 68% (28/41) of patients, respectively, were in sustained remission. Mild infusion reactions occurred in five participants (12%) and neutropenia in nine (21%). No significant decrease in IgG level was reported during treatment, and whereas IgM levels decreased in 34 patients (83%), they were normal at last follow-up in 32 (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results identified low-dose obinituzumab as a promising treatment option in children with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome, including those resistant to rituximab. The tolerance profile of obinutuzumab was similar to that of rituximab, but hemogram and immunoglobulin levels should be monitored.

Implications of rituximab pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various immune-mediated glomerulopathies and potential anti-CD20 therapy alternatives

The specific B-cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) is effective in terms of the treatment of various immune-mediated glomerulopathies. The administration of RTX has been shown to be reliable and highly effective particularly in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, which is manifested predominantly with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Stable long-term B-cell depletion is usually readily attained in such patients using standard dosing regimens. However, in patients with nephrotic syndrome and non-selective proteinuria, the RTX pharmacokinetics is altered profoundly and RTX does not maintain high enough levels for a sufficiently long period, which may render RTX treatment ineffective. Since complement-derived cytotoxicity is one of the important modes of action of RTX, hypocomplementemia, frequently associated with systemic lupus erythematodes, may act to hamper the efficacy of RTX in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis. This review provides a description of RTX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in several selected glomerulopathies, as well as the impact of proteinuria, anti-drug antibodies and other clinical variables on the clearance and volume of distribution of RTX. The impact of plasmapheresis and peritoneal dialysis on the clearance of RTX is also discussed in the paper. A review is provided of the potential association between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various kidney-affecting glomerular diseases, the sustainability of B-cell depletion and the clinical efficacy of RTX, with proposals for potential dosing implications. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment tailoring is also discussed, and various previously tested RTX dosing schedules are compared in terms of their clinical and laboratory treatment responses. Since alternative anti-CD20 molecules may prove effective in RTX unresponsive patients, their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and current role in the treatment of glomerulopathies are also mentioned.

Anti-rituximab antibodies in pediatric steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces sustained remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, there is no consensus on the optimal regimen and monitoring of rituximab. In other autoimmune diseases, anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) have been reported in 10-40% of patients, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. In nephrotic syndrome, data are scarce.

METHODS

We report a single-center retrospective study with immuno- and pharmacological monitoring of rituximab treatment in children with frequent relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We analyzed the monthly monitoring of 24 children, receiving a dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) between December 2017 and April 2018 at the Pediatric Nephrology Department of Robert-Debré hospital, Paris.

RESULTS

ARA were detected in 7/24 patients (29%), sometimes after the first infusion of rituximab. ARA were present at baseline in two patients previously treated with rituximab. Both displayed no B-cell depletion. ARA were also reported in 5/22 patients during follow-up, with antibodies always detected in the first month following B-cell recovery. An incomplete CD19+CD20- B-cell depletion at M1 (5-25/mm³) and low serum rituximab levels was predictive of developing ARA. The development of de novo ARA during follow-up was not associated with shorter B-cell depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ARA are frequent in children with FR/SDNS and that close immuno- and pharmacological monitoring may help personalizing rituximab treatment in patients needing repeated injections.

UK experience of ofatumumab in recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis post-kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), commonly caused by focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), is associated with progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease, requirement for kidney replacement therapy and a risk of disease recurrence post-kidney transplantation. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully humanised monoclonal antibody to CD20, with similar mechanisms of action to rituximab (RTX).

METHODS

We report a case series of seven UK patients (five paediatric, two adult), all of whom developed FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation and received OFA as part of their therapeutic intervention. All also received concomitant plasmapheresis. The 2-year outcome of these seven patients is reported, describing clinical course, kidney function and proteinuria.

RESULTS

Four patients (all paediatric) achieved complete urinary remission with minimal proteinuria 12 months post-treatment. Three of those four also had normal graft function. Two patients showed partial remission-brief improvement to non-nephrotic proteinuria (197 mg/mmol) in one patient, maintained improvement in kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate 76 ml/min/1.73 m²) in the other. One patient did not demonstrate any response.

CONCLUSIONS

OFA may represent a useful addition to therapeutic options in the management of FSGS recurrence post-transplantation, including where RTX has shown no benefit. Concomitant plasmapheresis in all patients prevents any definitive conclusion that OFA was the beneficial intervention.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

Unfavorable impact of anti-rituximab antibodies on clinical outcomes in children with complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) are associated not only with adverse events, such as infusion reactions (IR) and serum sickness, but also with rituximab efficacy. However, the clinical relevance of ARA in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes of 13 children with complicated SDNS receiving repeated single-dose rituximab treatments at 375 mg/m² to assess whether ARA formation could impact toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab. Pre-rituximab 22 samples collected from patients who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses were measured by electrochemiluminescence analysis.

RESULTS

ARA were identified in 5 of 13 patients (9 of 22 samples). Median time to recovery of CD19⁺ B cells to > 1% of total lymphocytes and median relapse-free time after rituximab treatment were significantly shorter in the 9 ARA-positive samples than the 13 ARA-negative samples (41 vs. 100 days, p < 0.01 and 119 vs. 308 days, p < 0.05, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that time to CD19+ B cell recovery after rituximab was significantly shorter in ARA-positive samples than in ARA-negative samples (p < 0.005). Severe IR developed in two ARA-positive patients and serum sickness in one ARA-positive patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARA formation was high in the pre-rituximab samples of patients with complicated SDNS who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses, suggesting that ARA formation might have an unfavorable impact on the toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab doses in these patients.

Ofatumumab treatment for nephrotic syndrome recurrence after pediatric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS) after transplantation can be a challenge to treat. The result of the consequent long-lasting proteinuria is the loss of the graft. Disease recurrence after renal transplantation occurs in around half of cases, and the efficacy of therapeutic strategies is often limited. Recently, ofatumumab, a second-generation and fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective in severe situations.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from the medical records of children with recurrence of NS after renal transplantation treated with ofatumumab in France, after failure of previous treatments.

RESULTS

Six patients were included in this study in five centers with a median duration of follow-up of 10.5 months. Two different ofatumumab regimens were administered. The primary outcome was proteinuria at 6 months after the last dose of ofatumumab. No patient achieved a complete remission, 3/6 had a partial remission, and 3/6 had no response to ofatumumab. Four patients exhibited a minor allergic reaction with the first infusion. One patient died of infection, as a consequence of multiple factors. No malignancies were observed; however, the time of follow-up was not sufficient to see such disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, these results suggest ofatumumab has a poor efficacy in treating recurrence of NS after renal transplantation. However, it could be discussed in multidrug-resistant refractory NS, but infectious complications and overimmunosuppression have to be balanced. There is a need for further studies to confirm these findings and safety and to determine a standardized protocol in this indication.

Ofatumumab rescue treatment in post-transplant recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurrence is still debated. The use of the fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab has been suggested.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

Two boys with FSGS received a kidney transplantation at the age of 15 years from a deceased and a living donor. Maintenance therapy consisted of calcineurin inhibitors, antiproliferative agents, and prednisone. Early post-transplant FSGS recurrence was observed after 2 and 3 days. Rituximab infusion and plasmapheresis sessions were performed with transient clinical improvement in the first patient, and no apparent response in the second patient. Both patients were treated with two ofatumumab infusions, which induced in patient #1 a complete and stable remission for more than 12 months and in patient #2 a partial remission with a progressive reduction of proteinuria and normalization of serum protein levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Ofatumumab may be a therapeutic option for post-transplant FSGS recurrence in patients who respond poorly to rituximab.

Ofatumumab for multirelapsing membranous nephropathy complicated by rituximab-induced serum-sickness

Rituximab (375 mg/m²) achieved remission of the first episode and six relapses of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in a young male patient with podocyte phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA₂R)-related membranous nephropathy (MN) refractory to steroids and cyclosporine. Between-treatments interval averaged 17.4±4.2 months. The seventh infusion was complicated by delayed serum-sickness, which resolved with steroids. On subsequent relapse, the fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ofatumumab (300 mg) achieved remission of the NS, without significant side effects. Circulating CD19⁺ B cells were depleted, proteinuria decreased from 10.9 to 1.3 g/day, and serum albumin, immunoglobulin levels and glomerular filtration rate normalised. Twenty-eight months later, despite transient anti-PLA₂R depletion, ofatumumab (100 mg) failed to induce remission of the eighth relapse. Remission was safely achieved 5 months later with repeated ofatumumab infusion (300 mg). This treatment (€723) was less expensive than rituximab (€1801). Ofatumumab could be a safe and cost/effective rescue therapy for patients with MN sensitised against rituximab.

Rituximab-induced serum sickness in a 6-year-old boy with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

Rituximab (RTX) is a murine-human chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 that has been proven effective for preventing relapse in frequently-relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (NS). Serum sickness, a type-3 hypersensitivity reaction resulting from injection of foreign proteins, has been reported in patients treated with RTX. Herein, we describe a case of RTX-induced serum sickness (RISS) in a 6-year-old boy with steroid-dependent NS. He presented to the hospital with fever and polyarthralgia at 10 days after his fourth dose of RTX. Although he was started on empiric intravenous antibiotics, there was no evidence of septic arthritis and his symptoms resolved over the course of 4 days. He was diagnosed with RISS based on the chronology of RTX administration and the acute-onset self-limiting course of the polyarthritis. His serum human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) level on day 53 exceeded the limit of quantification (5000 ng/mL). The pathogenesis of RISS and the role of HACAs remain unclear. It is important for clinicians to recognize RISS, because further infusions of RTX may cause more severe reactions in patients with a history of RISS.