Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis: hypersensitivity and necroinflammatory pathways

The NLRP3 Inflammasome Is a Major Cause of Acute Renal Failure Induced by Polypeptide Antibiotics

Drug-induced acute renal failure (ARF) is a public health concern that hinders optimal drug therapy. However, pathological mechanisms of drug-induced ARF remain to be elucidated. Here, we show that a pathological process of drug-induced ARF is mediated by proinflammatory cross-talk between kidney tubular cells and macrophages. Both polymyxin B and colistin, polypeptide antibiotics, frequently cause ARF, stimulated the ERK and NF-κB pathways in kidney tubular cells, and thereby upregulated M-CSF and MCP-1, leading to infiltration of macrophages into the kidneys. Thereafter, the kidney-infiltrated macrophages were exposed to polypeptide antibiotics, which initiated activation of the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome. Interestingly, blockade of the NLRP3 activation clearly ameliorated the pathology of ARF induced by polypeptide antibiotics, suggesting that a combination of the distinct cellular responses to polypeptide antibiotics in kidney tubular cells and macrophages plays a key role in the pathogenesis of colistin-induced ARF. Thus, our results provide a concrete example of how drugs initiate ARF, which may give insight into the underlying pathological process of drug-induced ARF.

More on the invisibility of chronic kidney disease… and counting

Lack of awareness of a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients and physicians is a major contributor to fueling the CKD pandemic by also making it invisible to researchers and health authorities. This is an urgent matter to tackle if dire predictions of future CKD burden are to be addressed. CKD is set to become the fifth-leading global cause of death by 2040 and the second-leading cause of death before the end of the century in some countries with long life expectancy. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illustrated this invisibility: only after the summer of 2020 did it become clear that CKD was a major driver of COVID-19 mortality, both in terms of prevalence as a risk factor and of the risk conferred for lethal COVID-19. However, by that time the damage was done: news outlets and scientific publications continued to list diabetes and hypertension, but not CKD, as major risk factors for severe COVID-19. In a shocking recent example from Sweden, CKD was found to be diagnosed in just 23% of 57 880 persons who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CKD. In the very same large cohort, diabetes or cancer were diagnosed in 29% of persons, hypertension in 82%, cardiovascular disease in 39% and heart failure in 28%. Thus, from the point of view of physicians, patients and health authorities, CKD was the least common comorbidity in persons with CKD, ranking sixth, after other better-known conditions. One of the consequences of this lack of awareness was that nephrotoxic medications were more commonly prescribed in patients with CKD who did not have a diagnosis of CKD. Low awareness of CKD may also fuel concepts such as the high prevalence of hypertensive nephropathy when CKD is diagnosed after the better-known condition of hypertension.

Prognosis of severe drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis requiring renal replacement therapy

Objective

Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (DAIN) is often associated with improved outcomes, whereas some patients may still progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with severe DAIN requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) at baseline, and to explore the risk factors of progression to CKD.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients with severe DAIN confirmed by renal biopsies in our center over a 10 years period, all the patients received RRT at presentation. The clinical and pathological characteristics at baseline were recorded, and the outcomes (renal function recovered or progressed to CKD) during follow-ups were also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the independent risk factors of progression to CKD.

Results

Seventy-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, 13 patients (18.0%) progressed to CKD (GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²) after at least 6 months of follow-up, the remaining 59 patients achieved a favorable renal function recovery. Compared with patients who achieved renal function recovery (recovery group), the patients progressed to CKD (progression group) were older and had longer interval from symptom onset to treatment with steroids. The peak serum cystatin C concentration was higher in progression group than recovery group. Higher score of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) and more interstitial inflammatory cells infiltration were detected in renal tissue in progression group. According to multivariable analysis, higher peak cystatin C concentration (OR = 2.443, 95% CI 1.257, 4.746, p = 0.008), longer interval to treatment with corticosteroids (OR = 1.183, 95% CI 1.035, 1.352, p = 0.014) were independent risk factors of progression to CKD. The cutoff value of cystatin C concentration was 4.34 mg/L, at which the sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.3%, respectively; the cutoff value of interval to treatment with corticosteroids was 22.5 days, at which the sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% and 79.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Renal function was reversible in majority of patients with severe DAIN requiring RRT when early identification and treatment. Higher peak cystatin C concentration and longer interval to treatment with corticosteroids associated with worse renal prognosis.

The Emerging Role of the Innate Immune Response in Idiosyncratic Drug Reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) range from relatively common, mild reactions to rarer, potentially life-threatening adverse effects that pose significant risks to both human health and successful drug discovery. Most frequently, IDRs target the liver, skin, and blood or bone marrow. Clinical data indicate that most IDRs are mediated by an adaptive immune response against drug-modified proteins, formed when chemically reactive species of a drug bind to self-proteins, making them appear foreign to the immune system. Although much emphasis has been placed on characterizing the clinical presentation of IDRs and noting implicated drugs, limited research has focused on the mechanisms preceding the manifestations of these severe responses. Therefore, we propose that to address the knowledge gap between drug administration and onset of a severe IDR, more research is required to understand IDR-initiating mechanisms; namely, the role of the innate immune response. In this review, we outline the immune processes involved from neoantigen formation to the result of the formation of the immunologic synapse and suggest that this framework be applied to IDR research. Using four drugs associated with severe IDRs as examples (amoxicillin, amodiaquine, clozapine, and nevirapine), we also summarize clinical and animal model data that are supportive of an early innate immune response. Finally, we discuss how understanding the early steps in innate immune activation in the development of an adaptive IDR will be fundamental in risk assessment during drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although there is some understanding that certain adaptive immune mechanisms are involved in the development of idiosyncratic drug reactions, the early phase of these immune responses remains largely uncharacterized. The presented framework refocuses the investigation of IDR pathogenesis from severe clinical manifestations to the initiating innate immune mechanisms that, in contrast, may be quite mild or clinically silent. A comprehensive understanding of these early influences on IDR onset is crucial for accurate risk prediction, IDR prevention, and therapeutic intervention.

Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis in Clinical Oncology: A Comprehensive Review

Acute kidney injury in patients who suffer a malignancy is a common complication. Due to its high prevalence and effective treatment, one of the most frequent causes that both oncologists and nephrologists must be aware of is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). ATIN is an immunomediated condition and the hallmark of the disease, with the presence of a tubulointerstitial inflammatory infiltrate in the renal parenchyma. This infiltrate is composed mainly of T lymphocytes that can be accompanied by macrophages, neutrophils, or eosinophils among other cells. One of the major causes is drug-related ATIN, and some antineoplastic treatments have been related to this condition. Worthy of note are the novel immunotherapy treatments aimed at enhancing natural immunity in order to defeat cancer cells. In the context of the immunosuppression status affecting ATIN patients, some pathogen antigens can trigger the development of the disease. Finally, hematological malignancies can also manifest in the kidney leading to ATIN, even at the debut of the disease. In this review, we aim to comprehensively examine differential diagnosis of ATIN in the setting of a neoplastic patient.

New Biomarkers in Acute Tubulointerstitial Nephritis: A Novel Approach to a Classic Condition

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) is an immunomediated cause of acute kidney injury. The prevalence of ATIN among the causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) is not negligible, especially those cases related to certain drugs. To date, there is a lack of reliable non-invasive diagnostic and follow-up markers. The gold standard for diagnosis is kidney biopsy, which shows a pattern of tubulointerstitial leukocyte infiltrate. The urinalysis findings can aid in the diagnosis but are no longer considered sensitive or specific. Atthe present time, there is a rising attentiveness tofinding trustworthy biomarkers of the disease, with special focus in urinary cytokines and chemokines that may reflect kidney local inflammation. Cell-based tests are of notable interest to identify the exact drug involved in hypersensitivity reactions to drugs, manifesting as ATIN. Certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms in HLA or cytokine genes may confer susceptibility to the disease according to pathophysiological basis. In this review, we aim to critically examine and summarize the available evidence on this topic.

Nefritis tubulointersticial aguda. Revisión bibliográfica

La nefritis tubulointersticial aguda hace referencia a un tipo de daño renal que afecta principalmente el intersticio y ocasiona la lesión renal aguda, potencialmente reversible. Su curso puede ser subclínico, con deterioro progresivo hasta evolucionar hacia la insuficiencia renal crónica. La nefritis tubulointersticial aguda tiene múltiples etiologías, las más frecuentes son los medicamentos, productos herbales, las infecciones y las enfermedades autoinmunes. Las principales manifestaciones clínicas son la poliuria, polaquiuria, nocturia, dolor lumbar, microhematuria y leucocituria, aunque puede ser totalmente asintomática. El tratamiento depende de la causa de base y los esteroides juegan un papel importante cuando la condición es de origen medicamentoso o autoinmune. El pronóstico generalmente es bueno, si el problema se identifica de forma oportuna y se trata adecuadamente.

Arachidonic Acid Metabolism and Kidney Inflammation

As a major component of cell membrane lipids, Arachidonic acid (AA), being a major component of the cell membrane lipid content, is mainly metabolized by three kinds of enzymes: cyclooxygenase (COX), lipoxygenase (LOX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. Based on these three metabolic pathways, AA could be converted into various metabolites that trigger different inflammatory responses. In the kidney, prostaglandins (PG), thromboxane (Tx), leukotrienes (LTs) and hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs) are the major metabolites generated from AA. An increased level of prostaglandins (PGs), TxA₂ and leukotriene B4 (LTB₄) results in inflammatory damage to the kidney. Moreover, the LTB₄-leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1) axis participates in the acute kidney injury via mediating the recruitment of renal neutrophils. In addition, AA can regulate renal ion transport through 19-hydroxystilbenetetraenoic acid (19-HETE) and 20-HETE, both of which are produced by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) generated by the CYP450 enzyme also plays a paramount role in the kidney damage during the inflammation process. For example, 14 and 15-EET mitigated ischemia/reperfusion-caused renal tubular epithelial cell damage. Many drug candidates that target the AA metabolism pathways are being developed to treat kidney inflammation. These observations support an extraordinary interest in a wide range of studies on drug interventions aiming to control AA metabolism and kidney inflammation.

Nephrotoxicity: Role and significance of renal biomarkers in the early detection of acute renal injury

Nephrotoxicity is defining as rapid deterioration in the kidney function due to toxic effect of medications and chemicals. There are various forms, and some drugs may affect renal function in more than one way. Nephrotoxins are substances displaying nephrotoxicity. Different mechanisms lead to nephrotoxicity, including renal tubular toxicity, inflammation, glomerular damage, crystal nephropathy, and thrombotic microangiopathy. The traditional markers of nephrotoxicity and renal dysfunction are blood urea and serum creatinine which are regarded as low sensitive in the detection of early renal damage. Thus, the detection of the initial renal injures required new biomarkers which are more sensitive and highly specific that gives an insight into the site of underlying renal damage. Kidney injury molecule-1, Cystatin C, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin sera levels are more sensitive than blood urea and serum creatinine in the detection of acute kidney injury during nephrotoxicity.