Long-term outcomes in children on chronic continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study from a developing country

Centre-level variation in the survival of patients receiving haemodialysis in India: findings from a nationwide private haemodialysis network

Background

There are no large studies examining survival in patients receiving haemodialysis in India or considering centre-level effects on survival. We measured survival variation between dialysis centres across India and evaluated the extent to which differences are explained by measured centre characteristics.

Methods

This is a multilevel analysis of patient survival in centres of the NephroPlus dialysis network consisting of 193 centres across India. Patients receiving haemodialysis at a centre for ≥90 days between April 2014 and June 2019 were included, with analyses restricted to centres with ≥10 such patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, measured from 90 days after joining a centre. Proportional hazards models with shared frailty were used to model centre- and patient-level effects on survival.

Findings

Amongst 23,601 patients (median age 53 years; 29% female), the unadjusted centre-specific 180-day Kaplan-Meier survival estimates ranged between 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38-80%) and 100%, with a median of 88% (interquartile interval 83%-92%). After accounting for multilevel factors, estimated 180-day survival ranged between 83% (73-89%) and 97% (95-98%), with 90% 180-day survival in the average centre. The mortality rate in patients attending rural centres was 32% (Hazard Ratio 1.32; 95% CI 1.06-1.65) higher than those at urban centres in adjusted analyses. Multiple patient characteristics were associated with mortality.

Interpretation

This is the first national benchmark for survival amongst dialysis patients in India. Centre- and patient-level characteristics are associated with survival but there remains unexplained variation between centres. As India continues to widen dialysis access, ongoing quality improvement programs will be an important part of ensuring that patients experience the best possible outcomes at the point of care.

Funding

This project received no external funding.

Outcomes of Maintenance Peritoneal Dialysis in Children: A State Hospital Experience from Southeastern Turkey

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features, laboratory features, and outcomes of pediatric patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and compare the factors affecting mortality. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of 50 patients on maintenance PD followed up for more than 3 months were retrospectively analyzed for non-survivors and survivors to evaluate all factors affecting mortality. The patients (26 boys and 24 girls) had a mean age of 85.4 ± 58.7 months (range: 1-194 months) at the initiation of PD. The mean duration of dialysis at follow-up was 27.8 ± 21.7 months (range: 3-115 months). The rate of peritonitis was one episode per 27.27 patient months. PD was discontinued because of transplantation in eight patients, death in eight patients, and shifting to hemodialysis in three patients. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year patient survival rate at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years was 81.8%, 51.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. Non-survivors were significantly younger at the start of kidney replacement therapy, had a final younger age at dialysis, and had lower albumin levels than survivors. We excluded four patients with a follow-up period of <6 months. Cox regression analysis revealed a low albumin status (P = 0.014, hazard ratio: 0.230) and a high level of ferritin (P = 0.002, hazard ratio: 1.002) to be risk factors for mortality. This study showed a high mortality rate. Hypoalbuminemia, a younger age at the start of kidney replacement therapy, and a younger final age at dialysis had a significant association with mortality.

Care of the pediatric patient on chronic peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis is the most commonly prescribed dialysis modality for infants and young children with kidney failure worldwide. Provision of high-quality care for the pediatric patient on chronic peritoneal dialysis requires a multidisciplinary approach and a strong collaboration with the patient and their caregiver. This article not only reviews current recommendations and advances in the care of pediatric patients on peritoneal dialysis with a focus on the provision of high-quality care and improvement in outcomes, but it also draws attention to health care disparities that exist locally and globally.

Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important home-based treatment for kidney failure and accounts for 11% of all dialysis and 9% of all kidney replacement therapy globally. Although PD is available in 81% of countries, this provision ranges from 96% in high-income countries to 32% in low-income countries. Compared with haemodialysis, PD has numerous potential advantages, including a simpler technique, greater feasibility of use in remote communities, generally lower cost, lesser need for trained staff, fewer management challenges during natural disasters, possibly better survival in the first few years, greater ability to travel, fewer dietary restrictions, better preservation of residual kidney function, greater treatment satisfaction, better quality of life, better outcomes following subsequent kidney transplantation, delayed need for vascular access (especially in small children), reduced need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and lower risk of blood-borne virus infections and of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PD outcomes have been improving over time but with great variability, driven by individual and system-level inequities and by centre effects; this variation is exacerbated by a lack of standardized outcome definitions. Potential strategies for outcome improvement include enhanced standardization, monitoring and reporting of PD outcomes, and the implementation of continuous quality improvement programmes and of PD-specific interventions, such as incremental PD, the use of biocompatible PD solutions and remote PD monitoring.

The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be advantageous compared with haemodialysis treatment, although several barriers limit its broad implementation. This review examines the epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes, including clinical, patient-reported and surrogate PD outcomes.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has distinct advantages compared with haemodialysis, including the convenience of home treatment, improved quality of life, technical simplicity, lesser need for trained staff, greater cost-effectiveness in most countries, improved equity of access to dialysis in resource-limited settings, and improved survival, particularly in the first few years of initiating therapy.

Important barriers can hamper PD utilization in low-income settings, including the high costs of PD fluids (owing to the inability to manufacture them locally and the exorbitant costs of their import), limited workforce availability and a practice culture that limits optimal PD use, often leading to suboptimal outcomes.

PD outcomes are highly variable around the world owing in part to the use of variable outcome definitions, a heterogeneous practice culture, the lack of standardized monitoring and reporting of quality indicators, and kidney failure care gaps (including health care workforce shortages, inadequate health care financing, suboptimal governance and a lack of good health care information systems).

Key outcomes include not only clinical outcomes (typically defined as medical outcomes based on clinician assessment or diagnosis) — for example, PD-related infections, technique survival, mechanical complications, hospitalizations and PD-related mortality — but also patient-reported outcomes. These outcomes are directly reported by patients and focus on how they function or feel, typically in relation to quality of life or symptoms; patient-reported outcomes are used less frequently than clinical outcomes in day-to-day routine care.

Peritonitis in children on peritoneal dialysis: 12 years of tertiary center experience

Background and Objective

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) associated peritonitis is the most common cause of morbidity, mortality, and treatment failure in patients undergoing PD. We aimed to identify the incidence, pathogens, antibiotic susceptibility, and the outcome of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis in children.

Methods

Data from medical records of children who underwent PD between 2007 and 2018 in King Fahad Medical City were retrospectively collected. All children aged <14 years undergoing chronic PD were included. The demographic characteristics of patients, peritonitis rates, and clinical outcomes‏ were collected.

Results

In total, 131 children [boys, 68 (51.9%)] underwent automated PD for 305 years. The most common age group was 6-12 years (61 patients, 46.6%). A total of 74.0% of patients were new to dialysis; 25.2% were transferred from hemodialysis. Peritonitis incidence was 0.6 episodes/patient-year. Gram-positive and -negative organisms were identified in 50.1% and 22% episodes, respectively, whereas cultures remained negative in 20.5% episodes. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common isolated organism (22.1%), followed by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (11.1%). Peritonitis was resolved in 153 (73.6%) episodes, whereas 52 (25.0%) episodes required removal through the catheter. The multivariate logistic regression analysis found the exit site infection to be a risk factor for catheter removal. Three (1.4%) episodes caused death due to peritonitis complicated by septic shock‏.

Conclusions

Our data showed that the most common organisms causing peritonitis were similar to those reported in the previous international registry. The rate of peritonitis was high, but markedly improved in the past two years.