Anticoagulation strategies in continuous kidney replacement therapy - does one size fit all?

Clinical guidance for unfractionated heparin dosing and monitoring in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin is a widely used anticoagulant in critically ill patients. It has a well-established safety profile and remains an attractive option for clinicians due to its short half-life and reversibility. Heparin has a unique pharmacokinetic profile, which contributes to significant inter-patient and intra-patient variability in effect. The variability in anticoagulant effect combined with heparin's short half-life mean close monitoring is required for clinical efficacy and preventing adverse effects. To optimize heparin use in critically ill patients, effective monitoring assays and dose adjustment strategies are needed.

AREAS COVERED

This paper explores the use of heparin as an anticoagulant and optimal approaches to monitoring in critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional monitoring assays for heparin dosing have significant limitations. Emerging data appear to favor using anti-Xa assay monitoring for heparin anticoagulation, which many centers have successfully adopted as the standard. The anti-Xa assay appears have important benefits relative to the aPTT for heparin monitoring in critically ill patients, and should be considered for broader use.

Continuous renal replacement therapy in neonates and children: what does the pediatrician need to know? An overview from the Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred method for renal support in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) as it allows for gentle removal of fluids and solutes. The most frequent indications for CRRT include acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) as well as non-renal indications such as removal of toxic metabolites in acute liver failure, inborn errors of metabolism, and intoxications and removal of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. AKI and/or FO are common in critically ill children and their presence is associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, early recognition of AKI and FO is important and timely transfer of patients who might require CRRT to a center with institutional expertise should be considered. Although CRRT has been increasingly used in the critical care setting, due to the lack of standardized recommendations, wide practice variations exist regarding the main aspects of CRRT application in critically ill children.     Conclusion: In this review, from the Critical Care Nephrology section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC), we summarize the key aspects of CRRT delivery and highlight the importance of adequate follow up among AKI survivors which might be of relevance for the general pediatric community. What is Known: • CRRT is the preferred method of renal support in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children in the PICU as it allows for gentle removal of fluids and solutes. • Although CRRT has become an important and integral part of modern pediatric critical care, wide practice variations exist in all aspects of CRRT. What is New: • Given the lack of literature on guidance for a general pediatrician on when to refer a child for CRRT, we recommend timely transfer to a center with institutional expertise in CRRT, as both worsening AKI and FO have been associated with increased mortality. • Adequate follow-up of PICU patients with AKI and CRRT is highlighted as recent findings demonstrate that these children are at increased risk for adverse long-term outcomes.

Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin Analog) as a Sole Anticoagulant in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Critically Ill Children With Liver Disease: Single-Center Retrospective Study, 2010-2019

OBJECTIVES

Despite deranged coagulation, children with liver disease undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are prone to circuit clotting. Commonly used anticoagulants (i.e., heparin and citrate) can have side effects. The aim of this study was to describe our experience of using epoprostenol (a synthetic prostacyclin analog) as a sole anticoagulant during CRRT in children with liver disease.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective study, 2010-2019.

SETTING

Sixteen-bedded PICU within a United Kingdom supra-regional center for pediatric hepatology.

PATIENTS

Children with liver disease admitted to PICU who underwent CRRT anticoagulation with epoprostenol.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Regarding CRRT, we assessed filter life duration, effective 60-hour filter survival, and effective solute clearance. We also assessed the frequency of major or minor bleeding episodes per 1,000 hours of CRRT, the use of platelet and RBC transfusions, and the frequency of hypotensive episodes per 1,000 hours of CRRT. In the 10 years 2010-2019, we used epoprostenol anticoagulation during 353 filter episodes of CRRT, lasting 18,508 hours, in 96 patients (over 108 admissions). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) filter life was 48 (IQR 32-72) hours, and 22.9% of filters clotted. Effective 60-hour filter survival was 60.5%.We identified that 5.9% of filters were complicated by major bleeding (1.13 episodes per 1,000 hr of CRRT), 5.1% (0.97 per 1,000 hr) by minor bleeding, and 11.6% (2.22 per 1,000 hr) by hypotension. There were no differences in filter life or clotting between patients with acute liver failure and other liver diseases; there were no differences in rates of bleeding, hypotension, or transfusion when comparing patients with initial platelets of ≤ 50 × 109 per liter to those with a higher initial count.

CONCLUSIONS

Epoprostenol, or prostacyclin, as the sole anticoagulant for children with liver disease receiving CRRT in PICU, results in a good circuit life, and complications such as bleeding and hypotension are similar to reports using other anticoagulants, despite concerns about coagulopathy in this cohort.

Efficacy of Prostacyclin Anticoagulation in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal support modalities are highly prothrombotic. Anticoagulation is frequently used for patients receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS), and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine if prostacyclin-based anticoagulation strategies are effective compared to other anticoagulation strategies, in critically ill children and adults who needs extracorporeal support, such as continuous renal replacement therapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using multiple electronic databases and included studies from inception to June 1, 2022. Circuit lifespan, proportion of bleeding, thrombotic, and hypotensive events, and mortality were evaluated. Out of 2,078 studies that were screened, 17 studies (1,333 patients) were included. The mean circuit lifespan was 29.7 hours in the patients in the prostacyclin-based anticoagulation series and 27.3 hours in the patients in the heparin- or citrate-based anticoagulation series, with a mean difference of 2.5 hours (95%CI -12.0;16.9, p=0.74, I2=0.99, n=4,003 circuits). Bleeding occurred in 9.5% of the patients in the prostacyclin-based anticoagulation series and in 17.1% of the patients in the control series, which was a statistically significant decrease (LogOR -1.14 (95%CI -1.91;-0.37), p<0.001, I2=0.19, n=470). Thrombotic events occurred in 3.6% of the patients in the prostacyclin-based anticoagulation series and in 2.2% of the patients in the control series, which was not statistically different (LogOR 0.97 (95%CI -1.09;3.04), p=0.35, I2=0.0, n=115). Hypotensive events occurred in 13.4% of the patients in the prostacyclin-based anticoagulation series and in 11.0% of the patients in the control series, which was not statistically different (LogOR -0.56 (95%CI -1.87;0.74), p=0.40, I2=0.35, n=299). The mortality rate was 26.3% in the prostacyclin-based anticoagulation series, and 32.7% in the control series, which was not statistically different (LogOR -0.40 (95%CI -0.87;0.08), p=0.10, I2=0.00, n=390). The overall risk of bias was low to moderate. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies, prostacyclin-based anticoagulation was associated with fewer bleeding events, but with similar circuit lifespans, thrombotic events, hypotensive events, and mortality rates. The potential benefits of prostacyclin-based anticoagulation should be explored in large randomized controlled trials.