1
|
Volberg C, Schmidt-Semisch H, Maul J, Nadig J, Gschnell M. Pain management in German hospices: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:7. [PMID: 38172899 PMCID: PMC10763107 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01291-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Pain management is a necessary component of palliative care as most patients suffer from pain during the final phase of life. Due to the complex causation of pain in the last phase of life, it is important to utilize methods other than pharmacotherapeutic options in order to achieve adequate pain control. As little is known about treatment of pain in German hospices, a nationwide survey was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS All German hospices (259) were contacted by post in June 2020 and asked to participate in an anonymous cross-sectional survey. RESULTS A total of 148 (57%) German hospices took part in the survey. A broad variety of medication is used in the hospice setting. Metamizole is the most commonly used non-opiod analgesic , hydromorphone the most commonly used opioid, and pregabalin is the most commonly prescribed co-analgesic drug. The pain medication is usually prescribed as an oral slow-release substance. Standardized treatment schemes are rare among the responding hospices. Most of the respondents also use complementary treatment options, such as aroma (oil) therapy or music therapy, in the treatment of pain. Palliative sedation is used by nearly all responding hospices if all other treatment options fail. CONCLUSION This survey provides an overview of the treatment options for pain management in German hospices. A broad variety of pain medication is used. Compared to international literature, it is debatable whether such a large variety of different types of pain medication is necessary, or whether a reduction in the type of medication available and the use of standardized treatment schemes could benefit everyone involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Volberg
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Henning Schmidt-Semisch
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Department of Health and Society, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Julian Maul
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jens Nadig
- University Children's Hospital Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Martin Gschnell
- Department of Dermatology und Allergology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klein C, Voss R, Ostgathe C, Ansgar Schildmann J. Sedation in Palliative Care—a Clinically Oriented Overview of Guidelines and Treatment Recommendations. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 120:235-242. [PMID: 36851822 PMCID: PMC10282508 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The appropriate provision of sedation as a last resort for the relief of suffering in palliative care is dealt with variably in actual practice. This article is intended as an overview of practically relevant information found in treatment recommendations and guidelines. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, and a manual search was carried out online. Recommendations that were not available in either German or English, or that were specific to pediatric practice, were excluded. Publication quality was assessed with the AGREE II instrument (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II). The recommendations in the documents were qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS 29 publications (11 journal articles, 18 other) of varying quality according to AGREE II were included. All recommendations and guidelines were essentially based on expert consensus. The common indications for sedation are otherwise intractable delirium, dyspnea, and pain, in patients with a life expectancy of no more than two weeks. Existential distress is a controversial indication. The drug of first choice is midazolam. As the sedating effect of opioids is hard to predict, they should not be used as sedatives. The risks of sedation include respiratory and circulatory depression, as well as the loss of communicative ability, control, and autonomy. It is generally recommended that the patient's symptom burden and depth of sedation should be monitored; clinical and technically supported monitoring are recommended in some publications as well, depending on the situation. CONCLUSION There is a broad consensus in favor of sedation to relieve suffering in the last days and hours of life. Recommendations vary for patients with a longer life expectancy and for those with existential distress, and with respect to monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Klein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - Rafaela Voss
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
| | - Jan Ansgar Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Volberg C, Corzilius J, Maul J, Morin A, Gschnell M. [Pain management in German specialized outpatient palliative care : A cross-sectional study to present the current pain management of palliative patients in the home environment]. Schmerz 2023:10.1007/s00482-023-00693-x. [PMID: 36752874 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-023-00693-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the help of specialized outpatient palliative care teams (German abbreviation: SAPV), seriously ill and dying patients in Germany can be adequately cared for in their home environment until the end of their lives; however, there are no uniform standards or guidelines for well-executed pain management right now. OBJECTIVE This approach serves as basic research in the field of public health research. This is intended to present which methods (use of different professional groups, use of pain medications, alternative medical treatment etc.) the individual SAPV teams use for pain management. From this it can be deduced which procedures can be considered particularly effective. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2021. All German SAPV teams (n = 307) listed on the homepage of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) were contacted by post and invited to participate. A total of 175 teams (57%) responded to the request and were included in the evaluation. A descriptive data analysis was performed. RESULTS Pain management in the German outpatient care of palliative patients is based on several components. All common pain medications are used, but primarily metamizole (99.4%) as a non-opioid analgesic, morphine (98.3%) from the opiate series and pregabalin (96.6%) as a co-analgesic are mainly prescribed. If pain therapy fails, 22.5% of the SAPV teams perform palliative sedation for symptom control on a regular basis. CONCLUSION This cross-sectional study is the first of its kind to provide a general overview of the treatment options for pain management in German outpatient palliative care. In comparison with international studies, the question arises as to whether uniform therapy schemes and a reduction in the medication available in the individual SAPV teams could lead to an improvement in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Volberg
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
- AG Ethik in der Medizin, Fachbereich 20, Dekanat Humanmedizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
| | - Julien Corzilius
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Julian Maul
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Astrid Morin
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Martin Gschnell
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Hauttumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schildmann E, Meesters S, Bausewein C, Grüne B, Sophie Licher A, Bolzani A, Remi C, Nübling G, Benedikt Westphalen C, Drey M, Harbeck N, Hentrich M, Grüne B. Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in the Hospital. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:373-379. [PMID: 35440363 PMCID: PMC9487710 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on sedation at the end of life (eol) in different medical disciplines are scarce and mostly based on subjective reports. We aimed to assess the use of sedatives with continuous effect in the last week of life and associated factors in different hospital departments, with the aid of objectifiable criteria. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the medical records of patients who died in one of five clinical departments of German hospitals between January 2015 and December 2017 (hematology/oncology [two different departments], neurology, geriatrics, and gynecology). The use of sedatives that are recommended in guidelines for palliative sedation was analyzed, irrespective of indication and treatment intent, with the aid of published definitions of continuous effect and of at least moderately sedating doses. The analysis consisted of descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS 260/517 (50%) of the patients who died were given sedatives with continuous effect in the last week of life, 53/517 (10%) in at least moderately sedating doses. For 76/260 (29%) patients, no indication was noted. The term "sedation" was used in the medical records of 20/260 (8%) patients. The use of sedatives with continuous effect was significantly associated with the department in which the patient was treated (hematology/oncology II: OR 0.32, 95% CI [0.16: 0.63]; geriatrics: OR 0.23, 95% CI [0.10:0.50]; reference, hematology/oncology I). CONCLUSION It was not possible to draw a clear distinction between the use of sedatives for symptom control, without sedating effect or intent to sedate, and intentional sedation to relieve suffering. The observed differences between hospital departments and deviations from recommended practice, e.g. lack of documentation of the indication, warrant further exploration. Moreover, context-specific supportive measures for the use of sedatives and sedation at the end of life should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Schildmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich,Oncological Palliative Care, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology & Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin,*Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie Onkologische Palliativmedizin Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophie Meesters
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | | | - Bettina Grüne
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | | | - Anna Bolzani
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Constanze Remi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Georg Nübling
- Department of Neurologiy, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - C. Benedikt Westphalen
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, University Hospital, LMU Munich & Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich
| | - Michael Drey
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Geriatrics, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich & Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich
| | - Bettina Grüne
- Department of Youth and Youth Services, German Youth Institute (DJI), Munich
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schildmann E, Rémi C, Bausewein C. [Sedation in palliative care - step by step]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146:763-768. [PMID: 34062595 DOI: 10.1055/a-1227-1842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Sedation in palliative care, also called "palliative sedation", is an important treatment option for patients who experience unbearable suffering from treatment-refractory symptoms at the end of life. The aim is to reduce this suffering as far as possible by reduction of the patient's consciousness. Good communication between all people involved is crucial for these clinically and ethically challenging situations. This article presents definitions of key terms and of different types of sedation. It then describes the process of sedation step by step: 0. Pre-emptive discussion of the option of sedation (in the context of advance care planning); 1. indication and decision making; 2. information and informed consent; 3. documentation when starting sedation; 4. start of sedation; 5. monitoring and adaption of sedation; 6. medical and nursing care and documentation during sedation; 7. care and processes after the death of the patient (if applicable).
Collapse
|
6
|
Michels G, Sieber CC, Marx G, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Joannidis M, Müller-Werdan U, Müllges W, Gahn G, Pfister R, Thürmann PA, Wirth R, Fresenborg J, Kuntz L, Simon ST, Janssens U, Heppner HJ. [Geriatric intensive care : Consensus paper of DGIIN, DIVI, DGAI, DGGG, ÖGGG, ÖGIAIN, DGP, DGEM, DGD, DGNI, DGIM, DGKliPha and DGG]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2020; 115:393-411. [PMID: 31278437 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-019-0590-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The proportion of elderly, frail, and multimorbid people has increased dramatically in recent decades resulting from demographic changes and will further increase, which will impact acute medical care. Prospective, randomized studies on geriatric intensive care are still lacking. There are also no international or national recommendations regarding the management of critically ill elderly patients. Based on an expert opinion, this consensus paper provides 16 statements that should be considered when dealing with geriatric critical care patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Michels
- Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Cornel C Sieber
- Institut für Biomedizin des Alterns, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland
| | - Gernot Marx
- Klinik für Operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | | | - Michael Joannidis
- Gemeinsame Einrichtung für Internistische Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, Department Innere Medizin, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich
| | - Ursula Müller-Werdan
- Klinik für Geriatrie und Altersmedizin, Evangelisches Geriatriezentrum Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Wolfgang Müllges
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Georg Gahn
- Neurologische Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - Roman Pfister
- Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Petra A Thürmann
- Lehrstuhl für Klinische Pharmakologie, Helios Universitätsklinkum Wuppertal, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Deutschland
| | - Rainer Wirth
- Klinik für Altersmedizin und Frührehabilitation, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Deutschland
| | - Jana Fresenborg
- Seminar für Allgemeine BWL und Management im Gesundheitswesen, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ludwig Kuntz
- Seminar für Allgemeine BWL und Management im Gesundheitswesen, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Steffen T Simon
- Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Uwe Janssens
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Internistische Intensivmedizin, St.-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Deutschland
| | - Hans Jürgen Heppner
- Institut für Biomedizin des Alterns, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland
- Geriatrische Klinik und Tagesklinik, Lehrstuhl für Geriatrie, HELIOS Klinikum Schwelm, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Schwelm, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost every otorhinolaryngologist will be confronted with patients in need of palliative care. The development of comprehensive cancer centers in Germany strengthens the cooperation between otorhinolaryngologists and palliative care specialists for the benefit of patients with head and neck cancer. OBJECTIVE The present article provides an overview on palliative care in order to support otorhinolaryngologists in conscious end-of-life decision making and symptom management for head and neck cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search of the contemporary medical scientific literature was conducted in PubMed and on the websites of relevant specialist societies. RESULTS Different palliative care institutions are introduced and a general overview on palliative care is given. Possible practical solutions for management of typical palliative symptoms (dyspnea, pain, bleeding), negotiation (setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotions, and strategy/summary, SPIKES, model), and advanced care planning (living will, patient's free will, medical indication) are discussed. CONCLUSION Collaboration of otorhinolaryngologists and palliative care specialists has the potential to further increase quality of life and survival of patients with oncological head and neck diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Labbé
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Akupunktur und Palliativmedizin, Hagsche Str. 43, 47553, Kleve, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
[Geriatric intensive care : Consensus paper of DGIIN, DIVI, DGAI, DGGG, ÖGGG, ÖGIAIN, DGP, DGEM, DGD, DGNI, DGIM, DGKliPha and DGG]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2019; 52:440-456. [PMID: 31278486 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-019-01584-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The proportion of elderly, frail, and multimorbid people has increased dramatically in recent decades resulting from demographic changes and will further increase, which will impact acute medical care. Prospective, randomized studies on geriatric intensive care are still lacking. There are also no international or national recommendations regarding the management of critically ill elderly patients. Based on an expert opinion, this consensus paper provides 16 statements that should be considered when dealing with geriatric critical care patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Klein C, Wittmann C, Wendt KN, Ostgathe C, Stiel S. [Palliative sedation : Development and consensus of a German language documentation template]. Anaesthesist 2018; 67:504-511. [PMID: 29767825 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-018-0451-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative sedation (PS) serves as a therapeutic option in cases of otherwise intractable suffering. As the use of sedative and hypnotic medication in many diverse situations is a core competency of anesthesiology, anesthesiologists are confronted with questions of sedative therapy at the end of life in institutions for specialized palliative care, in intensive care units and intermediate care wards. In recent years a number of guidelines have been published internationally but so far no official guidelines exist in Germany. The most recognized document is the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) framework on PS. This project aims to develop a German language template for the preparation, application, documentation and evaluation of PS according to the current frameworks, especially the EAPC framework on PS. METHODS A first draft of the template was generated by the project team using the EAPC framework and individual templates of various institutions, which had been collected during a previous project. Professionals (n = 136) from inpatient and outpatient specialist palliative and hospice care were invited to assess all items of the draft regarding "relevance", "wording" and "feasibility" in an online Delphi survey (Unipark®, Questback, Cologne, Germany). After the second Delphi round an expert panel was asked to reflect the results and generate a final draft. Approval was granted if acceptance exceeded 75% of participants. RESULTS The 3 rounds of the Delphi process were completed by 64, 46 and 41 participants, respectively. The Delphi process as well as the expert panel led to significant changes of the template. The indications for PS had to be clarified. The significance of documentation of vital parameters, such as oxygen saturation, blood pressure or respiratory rate during PS was intensively discussed. In many teams, predominantly hospice or outpatient palliative care teams, it seems to be difficult to measure these parameters or it is regarded as inappropriate in a palliative care setting. In contrast, the EAPC framework recommends monitoring of vital parameters in cases of intermittent or respite sedation. Finally, a solution was found to support documentation of additional data without the explicit mentioning of specific parameters. After the third Delphi round, all 16 items of the documentation template reached consensus with respect to relevance (82.9-100%), clarity of wording (80.5-100%), and feasibility in practice (78-100%). CONCLUSION This article provides an empirically based, multiprofessional consented documentation template for PS. Core elements of the documentation of PS are the indications and the decision process towards PS. During the treatment, at least the level of sedation and the symptom burden have to be recorded. The documentation of vital signs during PS remains a highly disputed topic. The presented data suggest that especially in outpatient settings and in hospices measuring and documentation of vital parameters is uncommon and therefore is often regarded as not feasible. This template can help to support the medically and ethically sound use of PS and facilitate research. The template can be accessed at http://www.palliativmedizin.uk-erlangen.de/forschung/downloads/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Klein
- Palliativmedizinische Abteilung in der Anästhesiologischen Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - C Wittmann
- Palliativmedizinische Abteilung in der Anästhesiologischen Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - K N Wendt
- Palliativmedizinische Abteilung in der Anästhesiologischen Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Ostgathe
- Palliativmedizinische Abteilung in der Anästhesiologischen Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Stiel
- Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stiel S, Nurnus M, Ostgathe C, Klein C. Palliative sedation in Germany: factors and treatment practices associated with different sedation rate estimates in palliative and hospice care services. BMC Palliat Care 2018. [PMID: 29534713 PMCID: PMC5851294 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical practice of Palliative Sedation (PS) varies between institutions worldwide and sometimes includes problematic practices. Little available research points at different definitions and frameworks which may contribute to uncertainty of healthcare professionals in the application of PS. This analysis investigates what demographic factors and characteristics of treatment practices differ between institutions with high versus low sedation rates estimates in Palliative and Hospice Care in Germany. Methods Data sets from 221 organisations from a prior online survey were separated into two sub-groups divided by their estimated sedation rate A) lower/equal to 16% (n = 187; 90.8%) and B) higher than 16% (n = 19; 9.2%) for secondary analysis. Demographic factors and characteristics of PS treatment practices between the two groups were compared using T-Tests and Chi2/ Fisher Exact Tests and considered significant (*) at two-sided p < .05. Results Organisations in group B report that they discuss PS for a higher proportion of patients (38.5%/10.2%, p < 0.000**), rate agitation more often as an indications for PS (78.9%/ 53.5%, p = 0.050*), and are more likely to use Lorazepam (63.2%/ 37.4%, p = 0.047*), Promethazin (26.3%/ 9.6%, p = 0.044*), and (Es-)Ketamin (31.6%/ 12.8%, p = 0.039*) than representatives in group A. Both groups differ significantly in their allocation of three case scenarios to different types of PS. Conclusions Both definitions and patterns of clinical practice between palliative and hospice care representatives show divergence, which may be influenced one by another. A comprehensive framework considering conceptual, clinical, ethical, and legal aspects of different definitions of PS could help to better distinguish between different types and nuances of PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Stiel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. .,Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Mareike Nurnus
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carsten Klein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Bozzaro C. Der Leidensbegriff im medizinischen Kontext: Ein Problemaufriss am Beispiel der tiefen palliativen Sedierung am Lebensende. Ethik Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-015-0339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
13
|
Klosa PR, Klein C, Heckel M, Bronnhuber AC, Ostgathe C, Stiel S. The EAPC framework on palliative sedation and clinical practice—a questionnaire-based survey in Germany. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:2621-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2192-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2013] [Accepted: 03/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
14
|
[Palliative sedation for psycho-existential suffering]. Wien Med Wochenschr 2013; 164:172-8. [PMID: 24158418 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-013-0246-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Sedation in palliative care is generally considered as an important therapy in terminally ill patients with refractory symptoms. However the sedation of patients with intractable psycho-existential suffering is still under discussion. This paper discusses the case of a 56-year-old patient in the final phase of carcinoma of the ovaries, who required palliative sedation for refractory, mainly psycho-existential suffering. It describes the course on our ward and the difficult process of decision-making. We discuss our approach based on literature.
Collapse
|
15
|
[Pain relief at the end of life. A genuine medical task within palliative medicine]. MMW Fortschr Med 2012; O 154 Suppl 2:72-6; quiz 77-8. [PMID: 22916429 DOI: 10.1007/s15006-012-0777-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
16
|
Recht auf Schmerzbehandlung – Pflicht zur Fortbildung. Schmerz 2011; 25:7-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00482-011-1024-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|