[Cross-sectional subject 14--training in pain]

Interdisciplinary interactive blended learning concept in times of a pandemic - pain medicine "totally digital"

Introduction: Pain medicine is located in different sections of the medical curriculum. In the pandemic situation, an online teaching concept for Q14 which includes several disciplines had to be developed. The goal of the project was to create a fully digitized learning platform for the cross-sectional area Q14 that allows all participating disciplines to address the various learning goals without losing a practical component. Project description: First, the students' expectations regarding education in the field of pain medicine were recorded by means of a survey among medical students. Based on this, a teaching module in a blended learning format was developed, which consisted of two parts. Within a digital learning platform, students were first required to complete consecutive learning units using an interactive learning management system. This was followed by a presence phase (online ZOOM seminar) in which, under the guidance of teaching staff, the therapy suggestions of the individual case studies from the previous learning program were reflected. In the second part, the acquired knowledge was applied to a simulated patient. An evaluation of the online module was carried out through free-text answers and self-assessment of the completion time. The ZOOM seminar was evaluated on the basis of an assessment by the teachers. Results: The survey among students revealed a desire for practical training without "frontal teaching". The resulting project realized this aspect by teaching theory during an online module with case vignettes and interactive learning tasks. The subsequent online presence time during the ZOOM meeting enabled the students to repeat and deepen contents and to ask questions. 170 students completed the entire online program, of which evaluation data were available for 75 students. Self-assessment of completion time averaged at 4-6 hours. In the feedback, 90 aspects were addressed, including mainly comments on content (43%), praise (33%) and comments on technical problems (23%). According to the assessment of the presenters, the students were able to carry out the pain anamnesis survey in a structured manner. The submission of the therapy proposal, however, represents a particular hurdle. Conclusion: With the presented blended learning concept it is possible to address the different learning goals and the interdisciplinarity of Q14 sufficiently. After further processing and improvement of the project, a controlled and more extensive collection of evaluation data is required to further investigate the benefit of the platform for the students regarding achievement of defined learning goals.

Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching

BACKGROUND

Pain is a devastating sensation and has to be treated immediately. Therefore, we developed a training program to improve the knowledge of medical students in the field of pain medicine. In the present study, the applicability and efficacy of this training program was tested.

METHODS

Half of the students attended first a training with simulated patients (SP) followed by bedside teaching (Group 1). Group 2 performed the training programs in reverse order. The evaluation based on standardized questionnaires completed by students (self-assessment) and all students took part in two practical examinations after the learning interventions.

RESULTS

This study included 35 students. The quality of the simulation was evaluated by the students with average grade 1.1 (1 = very good, 6 = very bad). The practical work on the ward with patients was rated with grade 1.4 of 6, the whole course with 1.1. Students of Group A were significantly better in the final examination (grade 1.7 vs. grade 2.2, p < 0.05). To rate the improvement of skills (self-assessment) we used a Likert Scale (1 = very certain, 5 = very uncertain). The following skills were similar in both groups and significantly better after the course: taking responsibility, expert knowledge, empathy, relationship building and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Training with simulated patients in combination with small-group teaching at the bedside with real patients achieves a dramatic increase in student competence. Students prefer learning from the simulation before bedside teaching and propose to include simulation into the curricular teaching of pain medicine.

[Cross-sectional field pain medicine Q14 - the Mainz model : Development of the pain medicine curriculum in the standard study course at the University Medical School of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Following the amendment of the Medical Licensure Act (ÄAppO) in 2012, pain medicine was introduced as a mandatory subject for students during undergraduate medical training. Medical schools were required to define and to implement adequate curricular and formal teaching structures based on interdisciplinary and multiprofessional requirements according to the curriculum for pain medicine of the German Pain Society. These aspects were considered in the new interdisciplinary curriculum for pain medicine, the so-called Mainz model.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A new curriculum based on the Kern cycle was developed and implemented at the Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz. Different teaching methods (lectures, interprofessional tutorials and bedside coaching in small groups) were used to impart professional expertise in pain medicine to medical students in an interdisciplinary clinical context.

RESULTS

The new curriculum was put into practice and evaluated starting from the winter semester 2014/2015. Before and after the first implementation, medical students were asked about the relevance of pain medicine and their perception of personal competence.

CONCLUSION

The interdisciplinary course in pain medicine was successfully introduced into the degree program based on the curriculum of the German Pain Society and the Kern cycle. With educational support, interdepartmental and multiprofessional collaboration the process of implementation of new interdisciplinary courses can be facilitated. In the future, the question how to increase the amount of practical lessons without increasing the load on teaching resources has to be resolved. Blended learning modules, such as a combination of E‑learning and practical lessons are currently being studied in smaller cohorts.