1
|
Varilek BM, Mollman S. Healthcare professionals' perspectives of barriers to cancer care delivery for American Indian, rural, and frontier populations. PEC INNOVATION 2024; 4:100247. [PMID: 38225930 PMCID: PMC10788248 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Objective This descriptive qualitative study sought to understand the barriers affecting cancer care delivery from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) serving American Indian (AI), rural, and frontier populations. Methods One-on-one, semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary HCPs (N = 18) who provide cancer care to AI, rural, and frontier populations were conducted between January and April 2022. Interviews were conducted via Zoom. Data were analyzed following thematic content analysis methodologies. Results Thematic content analysis revealed three major themes: (a) Access, (b) Time, and (c) Isolation. The themes represent the HCP perspectives of the needs and barriers of persons with cancer to whom they provide cancer care. Furthermore, these themes also reflect the barriers HCPs experience while providing cancer care to AI, rural and frontier populations. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence for the need and strong multidisciplinary support for an early palliative care intervention in rural and frontier South Dakota (SD). This intervention could support the needs of persons with advanced cancer as well as the HCPs delivering cancer care in rural settings. Innovation This study is the initial step to develop the first culturally responsive, nurse-led, early palliative care intervention for AI, rural, and frontier persons with advanced cancer in SD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M. Varilek
- South Dakota State University, College of Nursing, 2300 North Career Ave, Suite 260, Sioux Falls, SD 57107, USA
| | - Sarah Mollman
- South Dakota State University, College of Nursing – Office of Nursing Research, 1011 11 St, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kent EE, Tan KR, Nakamura ZM, Kovacs J, Gellin M, Deal A, Park EM, Reblin M. Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70187. [PMID: 39234997 PMCID: PMC11375528 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rural cancer caregivers experience obstacles in accessing services, obtaining respite, and ensuring their care recipients receive quality care. These challenges warrant opportunities to participate in evidence-based behavioral intervention trials to fill support gaps. Adaptation to rural settings can facilitate appropriate fit, given higher caregiver service needs and unique challenges. We present findings from the adaptation process of a psychoeducational intervention designed to support cancer caregivers in rural settings. METHODS We adapted Reblin's CARING intervention, designed for neuro-oncology, to target caregivers of rural cancer patients across cancer sites. First, we conducted formative work to determine the unmet social and supportive care needs rural cancer caregivers faced. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to guide the modifications. To conduct the adaptation, we elicited feedback through qualitative interviews of seven caregivers and three cancer hospital staff and thematic analysis to inform intervention modifications. Our qualitative study was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). RESULTS Interviews revealed that service access was a pressing need, along with financial (e.g., treatment costs, employment challenges) and geographic barriers (e.g., distance to treatment, road conditions). We modified content, training, and context using the FRAME-IS steps. Changes enhanced fit through the following adaptations: changes to social support domains, session content, interventionist training, resource offerings, screening and recruitment processes, and virtual delivery. DISCUSSION Challenges to establishing successful psychosocial oncology interventions may be improved through participant-centered approaches and implementation science. Additional systemic challenges, including lack of systematic documentation of caregivers, persist and may especially disadvantage under-represented and underserved groups, such as rural dwellers. The enCompass intervention is undergoing ongoing single-arm pilot of rural cancer patient/caregiver dyads targeting caregiver coping self-efficacy and patient/caregiver distress (Clinical Trials #NCT05828927).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Cecil G. Sheps Health Services Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly R Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse Kovacs
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Maija Reblin
- Department of Family Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vadlakonda A, Cho NY, Chervu N, Porter G, Curry J, Sakowitz S, Coaston T, Rook JM, Juillard C, Benharash P. Association of uninsured status and rurality with risk of financial toxicity after pediatric trauma. Surgery 2024; 176:455-461. [PMID: 38772775 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric traumatic injury is associated with long-term morbidity as well as substantial economic burden. Prior work has labeled the catastrophic out-of-pocket medical expenses borne by patients as financial toxicity. We hypothesized uninsured rural patients to be vulnerable to exorbitant costs and thus at greatest risk of financial toxicity. METHODS Pediatric patients (<18 years) experiencing traumatic injury were identified in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Patients were considered to be at risk of financial toxicity if their hospitalization cost exceeded 40% of post-subsistence income. Individual family income was computed using a gamma distribution probability density function with parameters derived from publicly available US Census Bureau data, in accordance with prior work. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess factors associated with risk of financial toxicity. RESULTS Of an estimated 225,265 children identified for study, 34,395 (15.3%) were Rural. Rural patients were more likely to experience risk of financial toxicity (29.1 vs 22.2%, P < .001) compared to Urban patients. After adjustment, rurality (reference: urban status; adjusted odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.36-1.55) and uninsured status (reference: private; adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.67-2.05) remained linked to increased odds of risk of financial toxicity. Specifically among those with private insurance, Rural patients experienced markedly higher predicted risk of financial toxicity, relative to Urban. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest a complex interplay between rural status and insurance type in the prediction of risk of financial toxicity after pediatric trauma. To target policy interventions, future studies should characterize the patients and communities at greatest risk of financial devastation among rural pediatric trauma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amulya Vadlakonda
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. https://twitter.com/amulyavad
| | - Nam Yong Cho
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Giselle Porter
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joanna Curry
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Troy Coaston
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jordan M Rook
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Los Angeles CA; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Catherine Juillard
- Division of General Surgery (Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Section), University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Connor RM, Huang DS, Rimel BJ, Kim KH, Li AJ, Taylor KN, Liang MI. Unmet financial needs among patients crowdfunding to support gynecologic cancer care. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 186:199-203. [PMID: 38833852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients may use crowdfunding to solicit donations, typically from multiple small donors using internet-based means, to offset the financial toxicity of cancer care. OBJECTIVE To describe crowdfunding campaigns by gynecologic cancer patients and to compare campaign characteristics and needs expressed between patients with cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN We queried the public crowdfunding forum GoFundMe.com for "cervical cancer," "uterine cancer," and "ovarian cancer." The first 200 consecutive posts for each cancer type fundraising within the United States were analyzed. Data on campaign goals and needs expressed were manually extracted. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Among the 600 fundraising pages, the median campaign goal was $10,000 [IQR $5000-$23,000]. Campaigns raised a median of 28.6% of their goal with only 8.7% of campaigns reaching their goal after a median of 54 days online. On average, ovarian cancer campaigns had higher monetary goals, more donors, and larger donation amounts than cervical cancer campaigns and raised more money than both cervical and uterine cancer campaigns. Campaigns were fundraising to support medical costs (80-85%) followed by lost wages (36-56%) or living expenses (27-41%). Cervical cancer campaigns reported need for non-medical costs more frequently than uterine or ovarian cancer campaigns. States without Medicaid expansions (31% of the national population) were over-represented among cervical cancer and uterine cancer, but not ovarian cancer campaigns. CONCLUSIONS Crowdfunding pages reveal patients fundraising for out-of-pocket costs in the thousands of dollars and a wide range of unmet financial needs based on cancer type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed M O'Connor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dandi S Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth H Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Li
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristin N Taylor
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hallgren E, Moore R, Ayers BL, Purvis RS, Bryant-Smith G, DelNero P, McElfish PA. "It was kind of a nightmare, it really was:" financial toxicity among rural women cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1006-1015. [PMID: 36870038 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01344-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine how rural women cancer survivors experience and manage financial toxicity. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore experiences of financial toxicity among rural women who received cancer treatment. We conducted qualitative interviews with 36 socioeconomically diverse rural women cancer survivors. RESULTS Participants were categorized into three groups: (1) survivors who struggled to afford basic living expenses but did not take on medical debt; (2) survivors who took on medical debt but were able to meet their basic needs; and (3) survivors who reported no financial toxicity. The groups differed by financial and job security and insurance type. We describe each group and, for the first two groups, the strategies they used to manage financial toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Financial toxicity related to cancer treatment is experienced differently by rural women cancer survivors depending on financial and job security and insurance type. Financial assistance and navigation programs should be tailored to support rural patients experiencing different forms of financial toxicity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Rural cancer survivors with financial security and private insurance may benefit from policies aimed at limiting patient cost-sharing and financial navigation to help patients understand and maximize their insurance benefits. Rural cancer survivors who are financially and/or job insecure and have public insurance may benefit from financial navigation services tailored to rural patients that can assist with living expenses and social needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Hallgren
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
| | - Ramey Moore
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA
| | - Britni L Ayers
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA
| | - Rachel S Purvis
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA
| | - Gwendolyn Bryant-Smith
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St. - Slot 556, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Peter DelNero
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA
| | - Pearl A McElfish
- College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St, Springdale, AR, 72762, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mankan AK, Shankar A, Limaye S, Ajaikumar BS, Nachane P, Singh N, Dawkhar S, Batra U, Bhosekar A, Ganguly S, Gawli P, Debnath K, Padalalu V, Reddy P, Sundaramoorthy S, Naveen KK, Bondarde S, Kumar P, Davis S, Ramkissoon SH, Chacko RT, Vidal L, Chico I, Hegedus A, Gupta S, Saini KS. Cancer Trials Ecosystem in India-Ready for Prime Time? JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300405. [PMID: 38870438 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Executing global clinical trials for cancer is a long, expensive, and complex undertaking. While selecting countries global studies, sponsors must consider several aspects including patient pool, quality of trained investigators, competing trials, availability of infrastructure, and financial investment versus returns. With a large, often treatment-naïve, and diverse patient pool, relatively low cost, good quality health care facilities in urban areas, and a robust and well-trained workforce, India offers several advantages for conducting oncology clinical trials. However, there remains challenges, including a shifting regulatory environment in recent decades. With the implementation of the New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules in 2019, India's regulatory atmosphere seems to have stabilized. In this article, we present a review of the evolving clinical trial landscape in India, highlight the current regulatory scenario, and discuss the advantages and challenges of selecting India as a potential location for conducting global oncology clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abhishek Shankar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - Navneet Singh
- PostGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Ullas Batra
- Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Centre, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sanish Davis
- Indian Society for Clinical Research, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sudeep Gupta
- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Kamal S Saini
- Fortrea Inc, Durham, NC
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cheng TYD, Chaudhari PV, Bitsie KR, Striley CW, Varma DS, Cottler LB. The HealthStreet Cancer Survivor Cohort: a Community Registry for Cancer Research. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:366-374. [PMID: 35089522 PMCID: PMC9329490 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01173-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This report describes a cancer survivor cohort from a community engagement program and compares characteristics and willingness to participate in health research between the cancer survivors and non-cancer community members. METHODS Among 11,857 members enrolled in HealthStreet at the University of Florida (10/2011-03/2020), 991 cancer survivors were identified and 1:1 matched to control members without cancer on sex, age, and zip code. Demographics, body weight, height, social determinants of health, history of cancer, and willingness to participate in research were recorded by Community Health Workers as a part of the baseline Health Needs Assessment. RESULTS Among the cancer survivors, 71.6% were female and 19.2% lived in rural areas with a mean age of 56.7 years in females and 60.8 years in males. At baseline, 44.7% received a cancer diagnosis within 5 years, while 15.8%, more than 20 years. Cancer survivors (vs. matched non-cancer controls) were less likely to be Black (31.1% vs. 63.6%) but more likely to be divorced, separated, or widowed (49.5% vs. 41.2%), be normal/underweight (34.0% vs. 25.6%) and have health insurance (80.0% vs. 68.6%; all p < 0.05). Cancer survivors versus matched controls reported higher rates of ever being in a health research study (32.4% vs. 24.9%) and interest in participating in studies ranging from minimal risk to greater-than-minimal risk. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors from this community engagement program agnostic to cancer types and treatment are diverse in geography, race, and social determinants of health and can be a valuable resource for observational, interventional, and biospecimen research in cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Yuan David Cheng
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| | - Piyush V Chaudhari
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Kevin R Bitsie
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Catherine W Striley
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Deepthi S Varma
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Linda B Cottler
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, 4th Floor, P.O. Box 100231, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaddas HK, Millar MM, Herget KA, Carter ME, Ofori-Atta BS, Edwards SL, Codden RR, Sweeney C, Kirchhoff AC. Material financial hardship and insurance-related experiences among Utah's rural and urban cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01546-x. [PMID: 38340250 PMCID: PMC11315807 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01546-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Describe material financial hardship (e.g., using savings, credit card debt), insurance, and access to care experienced by Utah cancer survivors; investigate urban-rural differences in financial hardship. METHODS Cancer survivors were surveyed from 2018 to 2021 about their experiences with financial hardship, access to healthcare, and job lock (insurance preventing employment changes). Weighed percentage responses, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models for these outcomes compared differences in survivors living in rural and urban areas based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. RESULTS The N = 1793 participants were predominantly Non-Hispanic White, female, and 65 or older at time of survey. More urban than rural survivors had a college degree (39.8% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 35% of survivors experienced ≥ 1 financial hardship. In adjusted analyses, no differences were observed between urban and rural survivors for: material financial hardship, the overall amount of hardship reported, insurance status at survey, access to healthcare, or job lock. Hispanic rural survivors were less likely to report financial hardship than Hispanic urban survivors (odds ratio (OR) = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.08-0.73)). Rural survivors who received chemo/immune therapy as their only treatment were more likely to report at least one instance of financial hardship than urban survivors (OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 1.08-6.86). CONCLUSIONS The relationship between rurality and financial hardship among survivors may be most burdensome for patients whose treatments require travel or specialty medication access. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The impact of living rurally on financial difficulties after cancer diagnoses is complex. Features of rurality that may alter financial difficulty after a cancer diagnosis may vary geographically and instead of considering rurality as a stand-alone factor, these features should be investigated independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heydon K Kaddas
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, USA.
| | - Morgan M Millar
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sandra L Edwards
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rachel R Codden
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Carol Sweeney
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li S, Jiang Y, Yuan B, Wang M, Zeng Y, Knobf MT, Wu J, Ye Z. The interplay between stigma and sleep quality in breast cancer: A cross-sectional network analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 68:102502. [PMID: 38194900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stigma, a subjective internal shame, arises from the association of cancer with death. Sleep quality can be considered a product of stigma. However, the extent of overlap or difference between the two remains unclear. METHODS In total, 512 survivors with breast cancer were recruited from the "Be Resilient to Breast Cancer" project between May and August 2023. This study estimated the stigma, sleep quality, and their relationship by conducting a cross-sectional network analysis. The social impact scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale were employed in this study. RESULTS The core symptom for stigma from the network analysis was alienation by people (Strength = 1.213, Betweenness = 13, Closeness = 0.00211). The core symptom for sleep quality were the sleep quality (Str = 1.114, Bet = 17, Clo = 0.01586). Regarding the combination network, results showed that self-isolation and daytime dysfunction were the bridge nodes and that daytime dysfunction was positively associated with feeling less capable than before (according to self) (r = 0.15). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates the core symptoms in different symptomatic networks, which can be targeted for treatment personalization and aid in the improvement of sleep quality and stigma in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhan Li
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yingting Jiang
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Bixia Yuan
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Minyi Wang
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yihao Zeng
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - M Tish Knobf
- School of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, United States
| | - Jiahua Wu
- Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Zengjie Ye
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abujaradeh H, Mazanec SR, Sereika SM, Connolly MC, Bender CM, Gordon BB, Rosenzweig M. Economic Hardship and Associated Factors of Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Prior to Chemotherapy Initiation. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:36-44. [PMID: 37852896 PMCID: PMC10841408 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Economic hardship (EH) can negatively influence cancer outcomes. Little is known about the factors that are associated with higher levels of EH among patients with breast cancer (BC). This paper describes EH in women with early-stage BC prior to or at their first chemotherapy treatment (baseline) and explores whether there are differences by race, area deprivation, stress, symptom distress, and social support. PATIENTS AND METHODS A descriptive comparative/correlational design was employed using baseline data of a multisite, longitudinal, multimethod study comparing the symptom experience and management prior to prescribed chemotherapy for women with early-stage BC. Participants completed measures for EH, perceived stress, symptom distress, and social support. Race was measured by self-report. Area deprivation indices (ADI) measuring neighborhood economic factors were calculated from publicly available websites. RESULTS Participants (N = 248; age = 52.9 ± 12.3 years) were 62% White and 38% Black, 54% partnered, and 98% insured. Compared to White patients, Black patients reported higher (worse) EH (1.2 ± 3.0 vs. -0.7 ± 2.4), lived in areas of greater deprivation (80.1 ± 2.1 vs. 50.5 ± 23.5),and were more likely to report inadequate household income (Black: 30.5%; White: 11.1%). Adjusting for race and age, being Black (P< .001), living in an area of greater deprivation (P = .049), higher perceived stress (P = .008), lower perceived appraisal (P = .040), and less tangible support (P < .001) contributed to greater EH. Worse symptom distress trended toward greater EH (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS This study emphasizes the importance of incorporating baseline holistic assessment to identify patients most likely to experience EH during early-stage BC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Abujaradeh
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susan R Mazanec
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susan M Sereika
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary C Connolly
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Williams CP, Liang MI, Rocque GB, Gidwani R, Caston NE, Pisu M. Cancer-Related Financial Hardship Screening as Part of Practice Transformation. Med Care 2023; 61:S116-S121. [PMID: 37963030 PMCID: PMC10635335 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on financial hardship, an "adverse event" in individuals with cancer, are needed to inform policy and supportive care interventions and reduce adverse economic outcomes. METHODS Lay navigator-led financial hardship screening was piloted among University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology patients initiating treatment in October 2020. Financial hardship screening, including reported financial distress and difficulty, was added to a standard-of-care treatment planning survey. Screening feasibility and completion and proportions of reported financial distress and difficulty were calculated overall and by patient race and rurality. The risk of financial distress by patient sociodemographics was estimated. RESULTS Patients who completed a treatment planning survey (N=2741) were 18% Black, Indigenous, or persons of color (BIPOC) and 16% rural dwelling. The majority of patients completed financial hardship screening (90%), surpassing the target feasibility completion rate of 75%. The screening revealed 34% of patients were experiencing financial distress, including 49% of BIPOC and 30% of White patients. Adjusted models revealed BIPOC patients had a 48% higher risk of financial distress compared with those who were White (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.31-1.66). Large differences in reported financial difficulties were seen comparing patients who were BIPOC and White (utilities: 33% vs. 10%, upfront medical payments: 44% vs. 23%, transportation: 28% vs. 12%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The collection of patient-reported financial hardship data via routine clinical care was feasible and identified racial inequities at treatment initiation. Efforts to collect patient economic data should support the design, implementation, and evaluation of patient-centered interventions to improve equity and reduce the impact of financial hardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margaret I. Liang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | | | - Risha Gidwani
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nicole E. Caston
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Petermann VM, Biddell CB, Planey AM, Spees LP, Rosenstein DL, Manning M, Gellin M, Padilla N, Samuel-Ryals CA, Birken SA, Reeder-Hayes K, Deal AM, Cabarrus K, Bell RA, Strom C, Young TH, King S, Leutner B, Vestal D, Wheeler SB. Assessing the pre-implementation context for financial navigation in rural and non-rural oncology clinics. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1148887. [PMID: 37941608 PMCID: PMC10627810 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1148887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Financial navigation (FN) is an evidence-based intervention designed to address financial toxicity for cancer patients. FN's success depends on organizations' readiness to implement and other factors that may hinder or support implementation. Tailored implementation strategies can support practice change but must be matched to the implementation context. We assessed perceptions of readiness and perceived barriers and facilitators to successful implementation among staff at nine cancer care organizations (5 rural, 4 non-rural) recruited to participate in the scale-up of a FN intervention. To understand differences in the pre-implementation context and inform modifications to implementation strategies, we compared findings between rural and non-rural organizations. Methods We conducted surveys (n = 78) and in-depth interviews (n = 73) with staff at each organization. We assessed perceptions of readiness using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale. In-depth interviews elicited perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing FN in each context. We used descriptive statistics to analyze ORIC results and deductive thematic analysis, employing a codebook guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to synthesize themes in barriers and facilitators across sites, and by rurality. Results Results from the ORIC scale indicated strong perceptions of organizational readiness across all sites. Staff from rural areas reported greater confidence in their ability to manage the politics of change (87% rural, 76% non-rural) and in their organization's ability to support staff adjusting to the change (96% rural, 75% non-rural). Staff at both rural and non-rural sites highlighted factors reflective of the Intervention Characteristics (relative advantage) and Implementation Climate (compatibility and tension for change) domains as facilitators. Although few barriers to implementation were reported, differences arose between rural and non-rural sites in these perceived barriers, with non-rural staff more often raising concerns about resistance to change and compatibility with existing work processes and rural staff more often raising concerns about competing time demands and limited resources. Conclusions Staff across both rural and non-rural settings identified few, but different, barriers to implementing a novel FN intervention that they perceived as important and responsive to patients' needs. These findings can inform how strategies are tailored to support FN in diverse oncology practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria M. Petermann
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin B. Biddell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Arrianna Marie Planey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Michelle Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Neda Padilla
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Cleo A. Samuel-Ryals
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah A. Birken
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Katherine Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Allison M. Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kendrel Cabarrus
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Ronny A. Bell
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Carla Strom
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Tiffany H. Young
- Buddy Kemp Support Center, Novant Health Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Sherry King
- Carteret Health Care Cancer Center, Carteret, NC, United States
| | - Brian Leutner
- Pardee UNC Health Care, Hendersonville, NC, United States
| | - Derek Vestal
- UNC Lenoir Health Care, Kinston, NC, United States
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
DeBolt CL, Popovich JJ, Widere JC, Wibberly KH, Harris D. Rurality as a Risk Factor for Pulmonary Health Disparities. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:501-508. [PMID: 37517830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Rural populations experience significant pulmonary health disparities compared with urban populations. Patients in rural communities experience health determinants including high smoking prevalence, worse nutrition, lower educational attainment, specific occupational exposures, decreased health-care access, as well as unique cultural and political drivers of health. This article describes social determinants of pulmonary health relevant in rural communities, describes examples of existing pulmonary disparities in rural populations, and highlights health policies with potential to mitigate disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John J Popovich
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - J Christian Widere
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Katharine Hsu Wibberly
- Mid-Atlantic Telehealth Resource Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Drew Harris
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Okobi E, Adigun AO, Ozobokeme OE, Emmanuel O, Akinsanya PA, Okunromade O, Okobi OE, Aiwuyo HO, Dick AI, Sadiq-Onilenla RA, Ogunlana FA. Examining Disparities in Ownership and Use of Digital Health Technology Between Rural and Urban Adults in the US: An Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey. Cureus 2023; 15:e38417. [PMID: 37273368 PMCID: PMC10233341 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although research shows that digital health tools (DHT) are increasingly integrated with healthcare in the United States, very few studies have investigated the rural-urban differences in DHT adoption at the national level. Individuals in rural communities experience disproportionately greater rates of chronic diseases and face unique challenges in accessing health care. Studies have shown that digital technology can improve access and support rural health by overcoming geographic barriers to care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rates of ownership and preferences for utilization of DHT as a measure of interest among rural adults compared to their urban counterparts in the United States using a National Inpatient Survey. METHODS Data was drawn from the 2019 (n= 5438) iteration of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5 cycle 3). Chi-square tests and weighted multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to examine rural-urban differences regarding ownership, usage, and use of digital health tools to interact with health care systems while adjusting for health-related characteristics and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS The ownership rates of digital health technology (DHT) devices, including tablets, smart phones, health apps, and wearable devices, were comparable between rural and urban residents. For tablets, the ownership rates were 54.52% among rural residents and 60.24% among urban residents, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.61, 1.24). The ownership rates of health apps were 51.41% and 53.35% among rural and urban residents, respectively, with an adjusted OR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.42). For smartphones, the ownership rates were 81.64% among rural residents and 84.10% among urban residents, with an adjusted OR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.11). Additionally, rural residents were equally likely to use DHT in managing their healthcare needs. Both groups were equally likely to have reported their smart device as helpful in discussions with their healthcare providers (OR 0.90; 95% CI 63 - 1.30; p = 0.572). Similarly, there were similar odds of reporting that DHT had helped them to track progress on a health-related goal (e.g., quitting smoking, losing weight, or increasing physical activity) (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.75 - 1.83; p = 0.491), and to make medical decisions (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.70 - 1.59; p = 0.797). However, they had lower rates of internet access and were less likely to use DHT for communicating with their healthcare providers. CONCLUSION We found that rural residents are equally likely as urban residents to own and use DHT to manage their health. However, they were less likely to communicate with their health providers using DHT. With increasing use of DHT in healthcare, future research that targets reasons for geographical digital access disparities is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeka Okobi
- Dentistry, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Abuja, NGA
| | - Aisha O Adigun
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA
| | | | | | | | - Omolola Okunromade
- Public Health/Community Health Behavior & Education, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Greater Savannah Area, USA
| | - Okelue E Okobi
- Family Medicine, Medficient Health Systems, Laurel, USA
- Family Medicine, Lakeside Medical Center, Belle Glade, USA
| | - Henry O Aiwuyo
- Internal Medicine, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA
| | | | | | - Foluke A Ogunlana
- Family Medicine/General Practice, National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust Derbyshire, Derby, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morris BB, Hughes R, Fields EC, Sabo RT, Weaver KE, Fuemmeler BF. Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Associated With Radiation Treatment Nonadherence and Survival Among Rural and Nonrural Patients With Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:28-38. [PMID: 35777674 PMCID: PMC9797617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer treatment nonadherence is associated with higher rates of cancer recurrence and decreased survival. Rural patients with cancer experience a 10% higher mortality rate compared with their nonrural counterparts; geographic differences in nonadherence may contribute to this increased mortality. The goal of this study was to assess for geographic disparities and determine sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with radiation therapy (RT) nonadherence and survival among rural and nonrural patients with cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We examined cancer registry, medical records, and billing claims data at a safety net academic medical center. Geographic residence was defined as rural versus nonrural by US Department of Agriculture 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Other factors assessed were age, sex, race, marital status, insurance type, employment, area median household income, residential distance to cancer treatment center, clinical stage, cancer type, treatment modality, total radiation dose received, and radiation dose per fraction. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to examine 7 ways of operationalizing nonadherence and selected the definition that resulted in the best model fit statistics and prediction of mortality. Overall survival rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. We then examined nonadherence as the main exposure along with additional covariates in least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized survival analyses and as the outcome in our multivariable generalized linear regression analyses predicting nonadherence. We considered 2-way interaction terms with the main exposure, geographic residence. RESULTS We identified 3,077 patients with cancer who averaged 62 years old, were 59% female, 34% Black, and 14% rural. Twenty-two percent of patients missed at least 2 fractions and missed an average of 10% of their treatment plan. Rural patients experienced a higher mortality rate than nonrural patients (53% vs 42%, P < .0001). Survival was assessed through December 31, 2021, with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Proportion of missed fractions as the indicator of nonadherence provided the best model fit statistics and prediction of survival. Marital status, employment status, tumor, nodes, metastases stage, cancer type, and age at diagnosis significantly affected survival, in addition to a treatment delay by geographic residence interaction effect. Specifically, patients residing in rural areas who experienced a treatment delay were more than twice as likely to die as nonrural residents who also experienced a treatment delay, and nearly twice as likely to die as rural residents who did not experience a treatment delay. The 2-year survival rate was 76% for nonrural residents who did not experience a treatment delay versus 27% for rural residents who experienced a treatment delay. Patients who were widowed, had stage 4 cancer, or lung cancer were more likely to be nonadherent. Finally, patients residing in rural areas who experienced a treatment delay were more likely to subsequently be nonadherent. CONCLUSIONS In a geographically and racially diverse population, RT nonadherence is a significant concern that affects survival, yet it is a modifiable risk factor. We demonstrated that rural residence was associated with both RT nonadherence and poorer overall survival. Rural patients with a treatment delay had the lowest overall survival, compared with both nonrural survivors and rural survivors without delay. Rural residents who are delayed in starting treatment are at heightened risk for poor outcomes and should receive targeted support to mitigate the observed disparities. Additional patient populations that may benefit from targeted treatment adherence support include widowed patients and those with stage 4 cancer or lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny B Morris
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Richmond, Virginia.
| | - Ryan Hughes
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Emma C Fields
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Roy T Sabo
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Departments of Social Sciences and Health Policy & Implementation Science, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Bernard F Fuemmeler
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rowe A, Crawford-Williams F, Goodwin BC, Myers L, Stiller A, Dunn J, Aitken JF, March S. Survivorship care plans and information for rural cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:441-448. [PMID: 35334076 PMCID: PMC10036447 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01204-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to investigate the amount and type of survivorship care information received by cancer survivors living in rural Australia and whether this varies according to demographic factors or cancer type. METHODS Self-reported receipt of a survivorship care plan (SCP) and information on various aspects of survivorship care (e.g., managing side effects, healthy lifestyles, psychosocial advice and monitoring for recurrence) were collected from 215 cancer survivors who had returned home to a rural area in Queensland Australia after receiving cancer treatment in a major city within the previous 5 years (72% in the previous 12 months). Logistic regression was used to assess for differences across demographic factors and cancer type. RESULTS Only 35% of participants reported receiving a SCP and proportions of those reporting the receipt of specific information varied from 74% for information on short-term side effects to less than 30% for information on finances, chemoprevention and monitoring for signs of recurrence. No significant differences were found in the receipt of survivorship care information across demographic factors or cancer type. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that cancer survivors living in rural areas are not consistently provided with adequate survivorship care information, particularly that pertaining to long-term health and recovery. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Without improved systems for delivering survivorship care information to patients returning home to rural communities after treatment, these cancer survivors risk missing out on necessary information and advice to maintain their health, wellbeing and long-term recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlen Rowe
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
| | - Fiona Crawford-Williams
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Belinda C Goodwin
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia.
| | - Larry Myers
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Anna Stiller
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Springfield, QLD, 4300, Australia
| | - Sonja March
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Timko Olson ER, Olson AA, Driscoll M, Vermeesch AL. Nature-Based Interventions and Exposure among Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2376. [PMID: 36767741 PMCID: PMC9916332 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE nature-based interventions (NBI) have been shown to have positive effects on physical, psychological, social, and spiritual health. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to describe what is known regarding the cancer survivor experience in relationship to their interaction with the natural environment. Description/methods: this review was completed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The research strategy included a combination of these terms: cancer, neoplasms, nature, and forest therapy. The articles were blinded and screened by four independent researchers. A total of twelve articles were selected. Outcome/results: a total of 2786 cancer survivors participated in the twelve studies with multiple types and stages of cancer represented. The studies used multiple designs and measures. Results showed improvements in anxiety, depression, sleep, connectedness, stress, tension, confusion, fatigue, and pain. Participants reported that nature was the most important resource in coping with their cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS nature is beneficial for cancer survivors while they experience cancer diagnosis and treatment. Nature opportunities can be feasibly delivered with this population and need to be explored further and safely implemented to support the overall health and well-being of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica R. Timko Olson
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities, 308 Harvard St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | | | - Megan Driscoll
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities, 308 Harvard St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Amber L. Vermeesch
- Department of Family and Community Nursing, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27403, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nelson D, McGonagle I, Jackson C, Tsuro T, Scott E, Gussy M, Kane R. Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural-Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1585-1597. [PMID: 36826083 PMCID: PMC9955107 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. RESULTS In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural-urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of "moving on" from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nelson
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
- Macmillan Cancer Support, London SE1 7UQ, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)1522-837343
| | - Ian McGonagle
- School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Christine Jackson
- School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Trish Tsuro
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Research and Innovation Department, Pilgrim Hospital, Boston PE21 9QS, UK
| | - Emily Scott
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Peter Hodgkinson Centre, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5UA, UK
| | - Mark Gussy
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
- La Trobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bendigo P.O. Box 199, Australia
| | - Ros Kane
- School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dougherty EL, Corliss HL, Kritz-Silverstein D, Strong DR, Crespo NC, Finlayson TL. Relationship Between Sexual Orientation and Human Papillomavirus-Related Oral Cancer Knowledge and Awareness. LGBT Health 2023; 10:41-50. [PMID: 35917560 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oral cancers are increasing, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other people with a minority sexual orientation may be disproportionately impacted. This study examined the relationship between sexual orientation and HPV-related oral cancer knowledge. Methods: Data from 10,859 adult participants in the 2017-2019 Health Information National Trends Survey 5, cycles 1-3, were obtained. The three data sets were merged, and weighted multiple imputation (n = 15) was applied to address missingness. Weighted logistic regression analyses examined differences in HPV-related oral cancer knowledge between sexual minority versus heterosexual participants by sex, after adjustment for race, ethnicity, age, education, income, insurance, regular medical provider, and smoking status. Results: In this weighted sample, age ranged from 18 to 101 years (mean = 56.3 years); 42% were males, 5.2% were sexual minority men/women, and 94.8% were heterosexual/straight. Overall, only 19% of respondents were aware that HPV can cause oral cancer. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, there were no significant differences in HPV-related oral cancer knowledge for sexual minority men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.86-1.42) or women (AOR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.76-1.26) compared with those who were heterosexual/straight. Conclusion: Overall, knowledge of HPV-related oral cancer was low, regardless of sexual orientation. There were no differences in HPV-related oral cancer knowledge between sexual minority men and women compared with their heterosexual counterparts. Educational programs are needed to increase awareness of the HPV/oral cancer link. Further research on differences in HPV-related oral cancer knowledge and attitudes by sexual orientation and the intersection of other demographic factors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Dougherty
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.,Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Heather L Corliss
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Donna Kritz-Silverstein
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - David R Strong
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Noe C Crespo
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Tracy L Finlayson
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nelson D, Cooke S, McLeod B, Nanyonjo A, Kane R, Gussy M. A Rapid Systematic Review on the Experiences of Cancer Survivors Residing in Rural Areas during the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:16863. [PMID: 36554740 PMCID: PMC9778689 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable disruption to cancer care and may have exacerbated existing challenges already faced by cancer survivors from rural areas. This has created a need for a rapid evidence synthesis to inform the development of tailored interventions that address the specific needs of rural cancer survivors who continue to be affected by the pandemic. The review was conducted following guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group. Database searches were performed via the EBSCOHost interface (includes MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) on 25 May 2022 and supplemented with searches on Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed articles published after March 2020 that reported primary data on the experiences of cancer survivors residing in rural and remote settings during the pandemic were included. Findings were tabulated and written up narratively. Fourteen studies were included. The COVID-19 pandemic had a mostly detrimental impact on the experiences of rural cancer survivors. People's individual coping mechanisms were challenging for a range of reasons. Specifically, the pandemic impacted on their ability to access testing, treatment, check-ups and supportive care, their ability to maintain and access social support with close friends and family, as well as negative consequences to their finances and emotional wellbeing with some reporting feelings of psychological distress including depression and anxiety. This review provides important insight into the experiences of rural cancer survivors that may help inform tailored support in line with the needs and challenges faced because of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nelson
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
- Macmillan Cancer Support, London SE1 7UQ, UK
| | - Samuel Cooke
- School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Ben McLeod
- Lincoln Medical School, College of Science, University of Nottingham and University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Agnes Nanyonjo
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Ros Kane
- School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Mark Gussy
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
- La Trobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kent EE, Lee S, Asad S, Dobbins EE, Aimone EV, Park EM. "If I wasn't in a rural area, I would definitely have more support": social needs identified by rural cancer caregivers and hospital staff. J Psychosoc Oncol 2022; 41:393-410. [PMID: 36214743 PMCID: PMC10083183 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2129547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The social needs of rural families facing cancer warrant investigation to inform psychosocial care planning and policy development. METHODS Using purposive sampling, we interviewed 24 rural caregivers and 17 hospital staff from an academic cancer center in the U.S. South. Social needs were defined as the support needed to effectively provide informal caregiving across economic, physical, interpersonal, and service domains. We used the framework method to code and synthesize findings. FINDINGS Caregiver economic and physical needs were interconnected and most pressing, including common examples of distance to care and transportation barriers. Caregivers desired additional support from the health system, insurance providers, and community resources. Staff identified similar need patterns and gaps in health system capacity. CONCLUSIONS Rural cancer caregivers experience multiple unmet social needs. Supportive interventions for this population will benefit from flexible implementation and multilevel, multisector approaches. In particular, interventions that address financial hardship and limited internet access are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sejin Lee
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Asad
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin E Dobbins
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth V Aimone
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wheeler SB, Biddell CB, Manning ML, Gellin MS, Padilla NR, Spees LP, Rogers CD, Rodriguez-O'Donnell J, Samuel-Ryals C, Birken SA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Petermann VM, Deal AM, Rosenstein DL. Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT): a protocol for a multi-site, single-arm trial examining the effect of financial navigation on financial toxicity in adult patients with cancer in rural and non-rural settings. Trials 2022; 23:839. [PMID: 36192802 PMCID: PMC9527389 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06745-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost half of the patients with cancer report cancer-related financial hardship, termed "financial toxicity" (FT), which affects health-related quality of life, care retention, and, in extreme cases, mortality. This increasingly prevalent hardship warrants urgent intervention. Financial navigation (FN) targets FT by systematically identifying patients at high risk, assessing eligibility for existing resources, clarifying treatment cost expectations, and working with patients and caregivers to develop a plan to cope with cancer costs. This trial seeks to (1) identify FN implementation determinants and implementation outcomes, and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of FN in improving patient outcomes. METHODS The Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) study is a multi-site Phase 2 clinical trial. We use a pre-/post- single-arm intervention to examine the effect of FN on FT in adults with cancer. The LIFT trial is being conducted at nine oncology care settings across North Carolina in the United States. Sites vary in geography (five rural, four non-rural), size (21-974 inpatient beds), and ownership structure (governmental, non-profit). The study will enroll 780 patients total over approximately 2 years. Eligible patients must be 18 years or older, have a confirmed cancer diagnosis (any type) within the past 5 years or be living with advanced disease, and screen positive for cancer-related financial distress. LIFT will be delivered by full- or part-time financial navigators and consists of 3 components: (1) systematic FT screening identification and comprehensive intake assessment; (2) connecting patients experiencing FT to financial support resources via trained oncology financial navigators; and (3) ongoing check-ins and electronic tracking of patients' progress and outcomes by financial navigators. We will measure intervention effectiveness by evaluating change in FT (via the validated Comprehensive Score of Financial Toxicity, or COST instrument) (primary outcome), as well as health-related quality of life (PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire), and patient-reported delayed or forgone care due to cost. We also assess patient- and stakeholder-reported implementation and service outcomes post-intervention, including uptake, fidelity, acceptability, cost, patient-centeredness, and timeliness. DISCUSSION This study adds to the growing evidence on FN by evaluating its implementation and effectiveness across diverse oncology care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04931251. Registered on June 18, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Caitlin B Biddell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michelle L Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mindy S Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Neda R Padilla
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lisa P Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia D Rogers
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Julia Rodriguez-O'Donnell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cleo Samuel-Ryals
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Victoria M Petermann
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Edward J, Peterman VM, Eberth JM, Zahnd WE, Vanderpool RC, Askelson N, Rohweder CL, Koopman Gonzalez S, Stradtman LR, Ko LK, Farris PE. Interventions to address cancer-related financial toxicity: Recommendations from the field. J Rural Health 2022; 38:817-826. [PMID: 34861066 PMCID: PMC9163204 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Addressing financial toxicity among cancer patients is a complex process that requires a multifaceted approach, particularly for rural patients who may face additional cost-related barriers to care. In this study, we examined interventions being implemented by financial navigation staff at various cancer centers that help address financial toxicity experienced by oncology patients. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of financial navigation staff across 29 cancer centers in both rural and urban areas in 7 states. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Descriptive coding and thematic analysis techniques were used to analyze the data. FINDINGS Thirty-five participants were interviewed, the majority of whom worked in cancer centers located in rural counties. Participants identified the use of screening tools, patient education, and access to tailored financial assistance resources as best practices. Immediate resource needs included additional financial navigation staff, including lay navigators and community health workers, to promote linkages to local resources. Suggested clinical areas for intervention included proactive and early implementation of financial assessments and discussions between providers and patients, along with training and access to regularly updated resources for those in financial navigator/counselor roles. Participants also discussed the need for policy-level interventions to reform health systems (including employment protections) and health insurance programs. CONCLUSIONS Implementing proactive methods to screen for and address financial needs of patients is essential to improving cancer-related outcomes. Additional programs and research are needed to help establish systematic and standardized methods to enhance financial navigation services, especially for underserved rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Edward
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Victoria M. Peterman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jan M. Eberth
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health & Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Whitney E. Zahnd
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | | | - Natoshia Askelson
- Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Catherine L. Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sarah Koopman Gonzalez
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lindsay R. Stradtman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Linda K. Ko
- Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paige E. Farris
- Knight Cancer Institute’s Community Outreach and Engagement Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smith GL, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Chang S, Chino F, Conti RM, Greenup RA, Kroll JL, Liang MI, Pisu M, Primm KM, Roth ME, Shankaran V, Yabroff KR. Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: A multidisciplinary management approach. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:437-453. [PMID: 35584404 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately one-half of individuals with cancer face personal economic burdens associated with the disease and its treatment, a problem known as financial toxicity (FT). FT more frequently affects socioeconomically vulnerable individuals and leads to subsequent adverse economic and health outcomes. Whereas multilevel systemic factors at the policy, payer, and provider levels drive FT, there are also accompanying intervenable patient-level factors that exacerbate FT in the setting of clinical care delivery. The primary strategy to intervene on FT at the patient level is financial navigation. Financial navigation uses comprehensive assessment of patients' risk factors for FT, guidance toward support resources, and referrals to assist patient financial needs during cancer care. Social workers or nurse navigators most frequently lead financial navigation. Oncologists and clinical provider teams are multidisciplinary partners who can support optimal FT management in the context of their clinical roles. Oncologists and clinical provider teams can proactively assess patient concerns about the financial hardship and employment effects of disease and treatment. They can respond by streamlining clinical treatment and care delivery planning and incorporating FT concerns into comprehensive goals of care discussions and coordinated symptom and psychosocial care. By understanding how age and life stage, socioeconomic, and cultural factors modify FT trajectory, oncologists and multidisciplinary health care teams can be engaged and informative in patient-centered, tailored FT management. The case presentations in this report provide a practical context to summarize authors' recommendations for patient-level FT management, supported by a review of key supporting evidence and a discussion of challenges to mitigating FT in oncology care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:437-453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shine Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Juliet L Kroll
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kristin M Primm
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Biddell CB, Spees LP, Petermann V, Rosenstein DL, Manning M, Gellin M, Padilla N, Samuel-Ryals CA, Birken SA, Reeder-Hayes K, Deal AM, Cabarrus K, Bell RA, Strom C, DeAntonio PA, Young TH, King S, Leutner B, Vestal D, Wheeler SB. Financial Assistance Processes and Mechanisms in Rural and Nonrural Oncology Care Settings. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1392-e1406. [PMID: 35549521 PMCID: PMC9509146 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer are at heightened risk of experiencing financial hardship. Financial navigation (FN) is an evidence-based approach for identifying and addressing patient and caregiver financial needs. In preparation for the implementation of a multisite FN intervention, we describe existing processes (ie, events and actions) and mechanisms (ie, how events work together) connecting patients to financial assistance, comparing rural and nonrural practices. METHODS We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with stakeholders (ie, administrators, providers, and staff) at each of the 10 oncology care sites across a single state (five rural and five nonrural practices). We developed process maps for each site and analyzed stakeholder perspectives using thematic analysis. After reporting findings back to stakeholders, we synthesized themes and process maps across rural and nonrural sites separately. RESULTS Eighty-three stakeholders were interviewed. We identified six core elements of existing financial assistance processes across all sites: distress screening (including financial concerns), referrals, resource connection points, and pharmaceutical, insurance, and community/foundation resources. Processes differed by rurality; however, facilitators and barriers to identifying and addressing patient financial needs were consistent. Open communication between staff, providers, patients, and caregivers was a primary facilitator. Barriers included insufficient staff resources, challenges in routinely identifying needs, inadequate preparation of patients for anticipated medical costs, and limited tracking of resource availability and eligibility. CONCLUSION This study identified a clear need for systematic implementation of oncology FN to equitably address patient and caregiver financial hardship. Results have informed our current efforts to implement a multisite FN intervention, which involves comprehensive financial toxicity screening and systematization of intake and referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B. Biddell
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Victoria Petermann
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Donald L. Rosenstein
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michelle Manning
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mindy Gellin
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Neda Padilla
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cleo A. Samuel-Ryals
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sarah A. Birken
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Katherine Reeder-Hayes
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Oncology, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Allison M. Deal
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kendrel Cabarrus
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ronny A. Bell
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Carla Strom
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Tiffany H. Young
- Novant Health Cancer Institute, Buddy Kemp Support Center, Charlotte, NC
| | - Sherry King
- Carteret Health Care Cancer Center, Morehead City, NC
| | | | | | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cai T, Zhou T, Yuan C, Yu C, Ni F, Sheng Z. Heterogeneity of symptoms and functions among women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer in China: A multicentre, cross-sectional study. Front Public Health 2022; 10:952710. [PMID: 35991024 PMCID: PMC9381982 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCurrently, few studies have explored the heterogeneity of symptoms and functions in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to identify the subgroups of symptoms and functions in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer and determine whether the subgroups differed in demographic and clinical characteristics.MethodsA cross-sectional multicenter survey involving five hospitals in Zhejiang, Shanghai, Shandong, and Guangxi provinces of Mainland China was implemented between August 2020 to December 2021. Participants completed questionnaires that included the PROMIS-57, PROMIS cognitive function short form, and demographic and clinical characteristics. Latent class analysis was performed, followed by chi-square test and analysis of variance. Subsequently, significant variables were included in multinomial logistic regression.ResultsA total of 1,180 patients were investigated, with an average age of 48.9 years. Three classes were identified: low symptom burdens and functions group (26.2%, Class 1), moderate symptom burdens and functions group (16.9%, Class 2), and low symptom burdens and high functions group (56.9%, Class 3). Compared with patients in Class 1 and 3, those in Class 2 consistently showed a higher tendency of having urban employee health insurance (odds ratio = 2.506, P < 0.05) and rural health insurance (odds ratio = 2.207, P < 0.05). Additionally, patients in Class 2 tended to be in their fourth cycle of chemotherapy. However, receiving chemotherapy and surgery increased the likelihood of belonging to Class 1.ConclusionsA high proportion of patients experienced varying degrees of symptom and function issues, suggesting that attention is warranted for women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Patients with the urban employee basic medical system, the new rural cooperative medical system and in the early stage of chemotherapy cycles were more likely to have symptom burdens. Middle-aged postmenopausal women reported varying degrees of cognitive issues. Additionally, surgery increased the presence of potential long-term effects in functional levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Cai
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tingting Zhou
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Chunfang Yu
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Feixia Ni
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiren Sheng
- Nursing Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Zhejiang, China
- *Correspondence: Zhiren Sheng
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Williams CP, Davidoff A, Halpern MT, Mollica M, Castro K, Allaire B, de Moor JS. Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Patient Cost Responsibility for Rural and Urban Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1234-e1246. [PMID: 35947881 PMCID: PMC9377697 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between out-of-pocket spending and cost-related medication nonadherence among older rural- and urban-dwelling cancer survivors is not well understood. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, Medicare claims, and the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey linked data resource linked data (2007-2015) to investigate the relationship between cancer survivors' cost responsibility in the year before and after report of delaying or not filling a prescription medication because of cost in the past 6 months (cost-related medication nonadherence). Secondary exposures and outcomes included Medicare spending and utilization. Generalized linear models assessed bidirectional relationships between cost-related medication nonadherence, spending, and utilization. Effects of residence were assessed via interaction terms. RESULTS Of 6,591 older cancer survivors, 13% reported cost-related medication nonadherence. Survivors were a median 8 years (interquartile range, 4.5-12.5 years) from their cancer diagnosis, 15% were dually Medicare/Medicaid-eligible, and prostate (40%) and breast (32%) cancer survivors were most prevalent. With every $500 USD increase in patient cost responsibility, risk of cost-related medication nonadherence increased by 3% (risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04). After report of cost-related medication nonadherence, patient cost responsibility was 22% higher (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.32) compared with those not reporting nonadherence, amounting to $523 USD (95% CI, $430 USD to $630 USD). Medicare spending and utilization were also higher before and after report of cost-related nonadherence versus none. For survivors residing in rural (18%) and urban (82%) areas, residence did not modify adherence or cost outcomes. CONCLUSION A bidirectional relationship exists between patient cost responsibility and cost-related medication nonadherence. Interventions reducing urban- and rural-dwelling survivor health care costs and cost-related adherence barriers are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Amy Davidoff
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michael T. Halpern
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michelle Mollica
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Kathleen Castro
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Janet S. de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bhatia S, Landier W, Paskett ED, Peters KB, Merrill JK, Phillips J, Osarogiagbon RU. Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:940-952. [PMID: 35148389 PMCID: PMC9275775 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer care disparities among rural populations are increasingly documented and may be worsening, likely because of the impact of rurality on access to state-of-the-art cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment services, as well as higher rates of risk factors such as smoking and obesity. In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology undertook an initiative to understand and address factors contributing to rural cancer care disparities. A key pillar of this initiative was to identify knowledge gaps and promote the research needed to understand the magnitude of difference in outcomes in rural vs nonrural settings, the drivers of those differences, and interventions to address them. The purpose of this review is to describe continued knowledge gaps and areas of priority research to address them. We conducted a comprehensive literature review by searching the PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published in English between 1971 and 2021 and restricted to primary reports from populations in the United States and abstracted data to synthesize current evidence and identify continued gaps in knowledge. Our review identified continuing gaps in the literature regarding the underlying causes of rural-urban disparities in cancer outcomes. Rapid advances in cancer care will worsen existing disparities in outcomes for rural patients without directed effort to understand and address barriers to high-quality care in these areas. Research should be prioritized to address ongoing knowledge gaps about the drivers of rurality-based disparities and preventative and corrective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bhatia
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Wendy Landier
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oshiro M, Kamizato M, Jahana S. Factors related to help-seeking for cancer medical care among people living in rural areas: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:836. [PMID: 35765056 PMCID: PMC9241203 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08205-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the importance of timely diagnosis and access to treatment, previous studies have not adequately explored help-seeking behavior in cancer treatment among rural and remote residents. The barriers preventing help-seeking behavior also remain unclear. To address this research gap, this study conducted a scoping review to suggest a framework for eliminating barriers and facilitating help-seeking for cancer treatment among rural and remote residents. To conduct the scoping review, three English medical databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL) were examined for the keywords "rural," "remote," "cancer," and "help-seeking." The research objectives and study designs, participants, and excerpts describing help-seeking of the selected papers were recorded in a data charting form. Descriptions of help-seeking behavior were organized and summarized according to their meaning and integrated into factors using thematic analysis. All extracted factors related to help-seeking were sorted into four main themes according to the Ecological Model of Health Behavior, the theoretical lens for this scoping review: (1) Intrapersonal; (2) Interpersonal; (3) Groups, culture, and organizations; and (4) Policy/environment. Factors were categorized as barriers and facilitators of help-seeking. A total of 13 papers were analyzed. Intrapersonal factors such as self-reliance, symptom appraisal, and fatalism, were identified as barriers to help-seeking, whereas presentation of abnormal and serious symptoms facilitated help-seeking. Interpersonal factors such as lack of understanding of family members, influence of surrounding people, role obligations, and lack of trust in experts hindered help-seeking, whereas understanding from surrounding people such as family and friends, promoted help-seeking. Groups, cultural, and organizational factors such as prejudice, social stigma, shame, lack of anonymity, and social norms acted as barriers to help-seeking. Policy-related barriers to help-seeking included lack of medical services and physical distance from medical institutions, leading to a time burden. The study discussed the identified factors from a rural context. Future studies should consider the identified barriers and facilitators according to the four main themes in rural areas when formulating interventions to promote help-seeking. Our findings can offer a theoretical foundation to develop actionable policies, preventive strategies, and relevant interventional tools that may facilitate oncological service utilization in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Oshiro
- Department of Nursing, Okinawa Prefectural College of Nursing, Yogi 1-24-1, Naha City, Okinawa, 902-8513, Japan.
| | - Midori Kamizato
- Department of Nursing, Okinawa Prefectural College of Nursing, Yogi 1-24-1, Naha City, Okinawa, 902-8513, Japan
| | - Sayuri Jahana
- Department of Nursing, Okinawa Prefectural College of Nursing, Yogi 1-24-1, Naha City, Okinawa, 902-8513, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Corkum J, Zhu V, Agbafe V, Sun SX, Chu C, Colen JS, Greenup R, Offodile AC. Area Deprivation Index and Rurality in Relation to Financial Toxicity among Breast Cancer Surgical Patients: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Geospatial Differences in Risk Profiles. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:816-826. [PMID: 35426394 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity (FT) depicts the burden of cancer treatment costs and is associated with lower quality of life and survival in breast cancer patients. We examined the relationship between geospatial location, represented by rurality and Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and risk of FT. STUDY DESIGN A single-institution, cross-sectional study was performed on adult female surgical breast cancer patients using survey data retrospectively collected between January 2018 and June 2019. Chart reviews were used to obtain patient information, and FT was identified using the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity questionnaire, which is a validated instrument. Patients' home addresses were used to determine rurality using the Rural Urban Continuum Codes and linked to national ADI score. ADI was analyzed in tertiles for univariate statistical analyses, and as a continuous variable to develop multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the independent associations of geospatial location with FT. RESULTS A total of 568 surgical breast cancer patients were included. Univariate analyses found significant differences across ADI tertiles with respect to race/ethnicity, marital status, insurance type, education, and rurality. In multivariable analysis, advanced cancer stage (odds ratio [OR] 2.26, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.44) and higher ADI (OR 1.012, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.02) were associated with worsening odds of FT. Increasing age (continuous) (OR 0.976, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99), married status (vs unmarried) (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.70), and receipt of bilateral mastectomy (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96) were protective of FT. CONCLUSIONS FT was significantly associated with areas of greater socioeconomic deprivation as measured by the ADI. However, in adjusted analyses, rurality was not significantly associated with FT. ADI can be useful for preoperative screening of at-risk populations and the targeted deployment of community-based interventions to alleviate FT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Corkum
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery (Corkum, Chu, Offodile), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Victor Zhu
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (Zhu)
| | - Victor Agbafe
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI (Agbafe)
| | - Susie X Sun
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology (Sun, Colen), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carrie Chu
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery (Corkum, Chu, Offodile), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jessica Suarez Colen
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology (Sun, Colen), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel Greenup
- Section of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Greenup)
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery (Corkum, Chu, Offodile), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Health Services Research (Offodile), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX (Offodile)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Edward J, Bowling W, Chitwood H, Vanderpool R. Availability and Accessibility of Cancer Care Delivery Approaches to Reduce Financial Toxicity of Rural and Urban Cancer Patients in Kentucky. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NAVIGATION & SURVIVORSHIP 2022; 13:156-164. [PMID: 36698508 PMCID: PMC9873237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Cancer care delivery approaches to address financial toxicity among cancer patients are not well-established, especially in rural communities. Objectives To identify healthcare staff perspectives of financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients and to examine staff- and systems-level cancer care delivery approaches for addressing financial toxicity, with a focus on rural cancer survivors in Kentucky. Methods We conducted key informant interviews using a semistructured interview guide with cancer center staff who provided financial navigation and/or assistance to oncology patients and their caregivers at 15 cancer centers in Kentucky. Results Findings from this study revealed several key factors related to the availability and accessibility of cancer care delivery approaches at patient, staff, and system levels for reducing financial toxicity and improving access to care for rural and urban cancer survivors. Participants perceived high financial toxicity among cancer patients, especially in rural regions, related to the high cost of cancer care, as well the patients' limited ability to engage in cost-of-care conversations, low cost-related health literacy, and challenges in navigating cancer care. The availability of trained financial navigators/counselors dedicated solely to assisting the cancer patient population was limited, as was the use of standardized and proactive screening methods for financial toxicity. While in-house and external financial assistance programs were frequently tapped into, there were limitations in the navigators' ability to provide cost estimates based on insurance coverage and in assisting patients with applying for health insurance. Gaps in cancer care delivery approaches to reduce financial toxicity of patients included enhanced transportation options, additional financial navigation staff, early assessment of patient financial barriers and concerns, increased cost transparency, and enhanced cost-of-care conversations between patients and clinicians. Conclusion Establishing sustainable oncology-designated financial navigation roles is imperative to expanding patient support and improving health and financial outcomes of cancer patients. Future research is needed to gather evidence that informs programs targeted at mitigating financial toxicity of cancer patients in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Edward
- Assistant Professor, College of Nursing; Nurse Scientist, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - William Bowling
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Holly Chitwood
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Guerra CE, Fleury ME, Byatt LP, Lian T, Pierce L. Strategies to Advance Equity in Cancer Clinical Trials. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-11. [PMID: 35687825 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_350565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Cancer clinical trials are critical for testing new treatments, yet less than 5% of patients with cancer enroll in these trials. Minority groups, elderly individuals, and rural populations are particularly underrepresented in cancer treatment trials. Strategies for advancing equity in cancer clinical trials for these populations include (1) optimizing clinical trial matching by broadening eligibility criteria, screening all patients for trial eligibility, expanding the number of trials against which patients are screened, and following up on all patient matches with an enrollment invitation; (2) conducting site self-assessments to identify clinical-, patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers that contribute to low rates of clinical trial screening and enrollment; (3) creating a quality improvement plan that addresses the barriers to enrollment and incorporates the use of tools and strategies such as clinical trial checklists; workforce development and trainings to improve cultural competence and reduce unconscious bias; guides to promote community education, outreach and engagement with cancer clinical trials; screening and accrual logs designed to measure participation by demographics; models of informed consent that improve understanding; clinical trial designs that reduce accessibility barriers; use of cancer clinical trial patient navigators; and programs to eliminate barriers to participation and out-of-pocket expenses; and (4) working with stakeholders to develop both protocols that are inclusive of diverse populations' geographic locations, and strategies to access those trials. These actions will support greater access for populations that have remained underrepresented in cancer clinical trials and thereby increase the generalizability and efficiency of cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen E Guerra
- Department of Medicine, Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark E Fleury
- American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Inc., Washington, DC
| | - Leslie P Byatt
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Tyler Lian
- Department of Medicine, Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lori Pierce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ko LK, Scarinci IC, Bouchard EG, Drake BF, Rodriguez EM, Chen MS, Kepka D, Kruse-Diehr AJ, Befort C, Shannon J, Farris PE, Trentham-Dietz A, Onega T. A Framework for Equitable Partnerships to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Settings. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:pkac017. [PMID: 35603844 PMCID: PMC8997116 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Rural populations continue to experience persistent cancer disparities compared with urban populations particularly in cancers that can be prevented or detected early through screening and vaccination. Although the National Cancer Institute and the larger cancer research community have identified rural community partnerships as the foundation for reducing the disparities, we have identified limited application of community-based participatory research in cancer prevention and control research. Guided by the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model and our collective experience, we provide a framework for a community-cancer center partnership that focuses on promoting health equity. In this commentary, we articulate that the partnership process must foster capacity for communities and cancer centers, strive for rural representation in clinical trials and biobanking, build a pipeline for dissemination and implementation research, and create a bidirectional flow of knowledge between communities and academic institutions. Authentic partnerships with rural communities should be the ultimate goal of cancer centers, and the process described in this commentary can serve as an initial platform to build capacity and continue to strive toward that goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda K Ko
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Bouchard
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bettina F Drake
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Elisa M Rodriguez
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Moon S Chen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, UC Davis and UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Deanna Kepka
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Christie Befort
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Paige E Farris
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tracy Onega
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hung P, Shi K, Probst JC, Zahnd WE, Zgodic A, Merrell MA, Crouch E, Eberth JM. Trends in Cancer Treatment Service Availability Across Critical Access Hospitals and Prospective Payment System Hospitals. Med Care 2022; 60:196-205. [PMID: 34432764 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural residents experience worse cancer prognosis and access to cancer care providers than their urban counterparts. Critical access hospitals (CAHs) represent over half of all rural community hospitals. However, research on cancer services provided within CAHs is limited. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate trends in cancer services availability in urban and rural Prospective Payment System (PPS) hospitals and CAHs. DESIGN Retrospective, time-series analysis using data from 2008 to 2017 American Hospital Association Annual Surveys. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine differential trends in cancer services between urban PPS, rural PPS, and CAHs, overall and among small (<25 beds) hospitals. SUBJECTS All US acute care and cancer hospitals (4752 in 2008 to 4722 in 2017). MEASURES Primary outcomes include whether a hospital provided comprehensive oncology services, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy each year. RESULTS In 2008, CAHs were less likely to provide all cancer services, especially chemotherapy (30.4%) and radiation therapy (2.9%), compared with urban (64.4% and 43.8%, respectively) and rural PPS hospitals (42.0% and 23.3%, respectively). During 2008-2017, compared with similarly sized PPS hospitals, CAHs were more likely to provide oncology services and chemotherapy, but with decreasing trends. Radiation therapy availability between small PPS hospitals and CAHs did not differ. CONCLUSIONS Compared with all PPS hospitals, CAHs offered fewer cancer treatment services and experienced a decline in service capability over time. These differences in chemotherapy services were mainly driven by hospital size, as small urban and rural PPS hospitals had lower rates of chemotherapy than CAHs. Still, the lower rates of radiotherapy in CAHs highlight disproportionate challenges facing CAHs for some specialty services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiyin Hung
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
- South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality
| | - Kewei Shi
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
| | - Janice C Probst
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
| | - Whitney E Zahnd
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
| | - Anja Zgodic
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Melinda A Merrell
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
| | - Elizabeth Crouch
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
How cancer programs identify and address the financial burdens of rural cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:2047-2058. [PMID: 34655327 PMCID: PMC9380718 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06577-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is associated with negative patient outcomes, and rural populations are disproportionately affected by the high costs of cancer care compared to urban populations. Our objective was to (1) understand cancer programs' perceptions of rural-urban differences in cancer patients' experiences of financial hardship, (2) evaluate the resources available to cancer patients across the rural-urban continuum, and (3) determine how rural and urban health care teams assess and address financial distress in cancer patients. METHODS Seven research teams within the Cancer Prevention and Research Control Network conducted semi-structured interviews with cancer program staff who have a role in connecting cancer patients with financial assistance services in both rural and urban counties. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. We identified themes using descriptive content and thematic analysis. RESULTS We interviewed 35 staffs across 29 cancer care programs in seven states, with roughly half of respondents from programs in rural counties. Participants identified differences in rural and urban patients' experiences of financial hardship related to distance required to travel for treatment, underinsurance, and low socioeconomic status. Insufficient staffing was an identified barrier to addressing rural and urban patients' financial concerns. CONCLUSIONS Improved financial navigation services could mitigate the effects of financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients, particularly rural patients, throughout treatment and survivorship. Future research is needed to improve how cancer programs assess financial hardship in patients and to expand financial navigation services to better serve rural cancer patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Xu RH, Wang LL, Zhou LM, Wong ELY, Wang D. Urban-rural differences in financial toxicity and its effect on cancer survivors' health-related quality of life and emotional status: a latent class analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4219-4229. [PMID: 35083540 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06762-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the urban-rural differences in associations between financial toxicity (FT), physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL), negative emotional status, and the effect of patients' socioeconomic status and clinical and cost-related characteristics on the levels of FT in a sample of Chinese cancer survivors. METHODS Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey conducted by the oncology department at two tertiary level hospitals in China. The COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity, Euroqol five-level instrument (EQ-5D), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21) were used to measure patients' FT, physical HRQoL, and negative emotional status. A latent class analysis was used to identify patient subgroups with distinct symptom experiences based on self-reported data on symptom occurrence using the EQ-5D and DASS-21. RESULTS Four distinct latent classes were identified: all low (47.6%); high physical and low psych (18.6%); low physical and high psych (17.1%); and all high (17.1%). Rural patients younger than 50 years showed a statistically significantly higher FT than urban patients. Rural patients who were male, highly educated, insured, first hospitalization, new cases, received surgery or immunotherapy, and had low cancer-related costs in all low classes showed a higher FT than urban patients. CONCLUSIONS Rural patients with cancer suffered from higher FT than their urban counterparts, and the negative impact of psychological distress on FT was higher than that of physical HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Huan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Ling-Ling Wang
- Department of Blood Transfusion Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ling-Ming Zhou
- Department of Human Resource, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Dong Wang
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chileshe M, Bunkley EN, Hunleth J. The Rural Household Production of Health Approach: Applying Lessons from Zambia to Rural Cancer Disparities in the U.S. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020974. [PMID: 35055795 PMCID: PMC8776173 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
The recent focus on rural-urban cancer disparities in the United States (U.S.) requires a comprehensive understanding of the processes and relations that influence cancer care seeking and decision making. This is of particular importance for Black, Latino, and Native populations living in rural areas in the U.S., who remain marginalized in health care spaces. In this article, we describe the household production of health approach (HHPH) as a contextually-sensitive approach to examining health care seeking and treatment decisions and actions. The HHPH approach is based on several decades of research and grounded in anthropological theory on the household, gender, and therapy management. This approach directs analytical attention to how time, money, and social resources are secured and allocated within the household, sometimes in highly unequal ways that reflect and refract broader social structures. To demonstrate the benefits of such an approach to the study of cancer in rural populations in the U.S., we take lessons from our extensive HHPH research in Zambia. Using a case study of a rural household, in which household members had to seek care in a distant urban hospital, we map out what we call a rural HHPH approach to bring into focus the relations, negotiations, and interactions that are central to individual and familial health care seeking behaviors and clinical treatment particular to rural regions. Our aim is to show how such an approach might offer alternative interpretations of existing rural cancer research in the U.S. and also present new avenues for questions and for developing interventions that are more sensitive to people's realities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutale Chileshe
- Behavioural Science Unit, Clinical Sciences Department, Michael Chilufya Sata School of Medicine, Copperbelt University, Ndola P.O. Box 21692, Zambia
| | - Emma Nelson Bunkley
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Jean Hunleth
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ratnapradipa KL, Ranta J, Napit K, Luma LB, Robinson T, Dinkel D, Schabloske L, Watanabe‐Galloway S. Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers. J Rural Health 2022; 38:876-885. [PMID: 35381622 PMCID: PMC9492624 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rural (vs urban) patients experience poorer cancer outcomes and are less likely to be engaged in cancer prevention, such as screening. As part of a community needs assessment, we explored rural cancer survivors' and caregivers' experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care services. METHODS We conducted 3 focus groups (N = 20) in Spring 2021 in rural Nebraska. FINDINGS Three patterns of cancer diagnosis were regular care/screening without noticeable symptoms, treatment for symptoms not initially identified as cancer related, and symptom self-identification. Most participants, regardless of how diagnosis was made, had positive experiences with timely referral for testing (imaging and biopsy) and specialist care. Physician interpersonal skills set the tone for patient-provider communication, which colored the perception of overall care. Participants with physicians and care teams that were perceived as "considerate," "compassionate," and "caring" had positive experiences. Participants identified specific obstacles to care, including financial barriers, transportation, and lack of support groups, as well as more general cultural barriers. Survivors and caregivers identified organization-based supports that helped them address such barriers. CONCLUSIONS Rural populations have unique perspectives about cancer care. Our results are being used by the state cancer coalition, state cancer control program, and the National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to prioritize outreach and interventions aimed to reduce rural cancer disparities, such as revitalizing lay cancer navigator programs, conducting webinars for primary care and cancer specialty providers to discuss these findings and identify potential interventions, and collaborating with national and regional cancer support organizations to expand reach in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra L. Ratnapradipa
- Department of EpidemiologyCollege of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Jordan Ranta
- Sarpy/Cass Health DepartmentPapillionNebraskaUSA
| | - Krishtee Napit
- Department of EpidemiologyCollege of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Lady Beverly Luma
- Office of Community Outreach and EngagementFred & Pamela Buffett Cancer CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | | | - Danae Dinkel
- School of Health & KinesiologyUniversity of Nebraska at OmahaOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | | | - Shinobu Watanabe‐Galloway
- Department of EpidemiologyCollege of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA,Office of Community Outreach and EngagementFred & Pamela Buffett Cancer CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wheeler SB, Birken SA, Wagi CR, Manning ML, Gellin M, Padilla N, Rogers C, Rodriguez J, Biddell CB, Strom C, Bell RA, Rosenstein DL. Core functions of a financial navigation intervention: An in-depth assessment of the Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention to inform adaptation and scale-up in diverse oncology care settings. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:958831. [PMID: 36925862 PMCID: PMC10012722 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) is an intervention designed to address financial toxicity (FT) and improve cancer care access and outcomes through financial navigation (FN). FN identifies patients at risk for FT, assesses eligibility for financial support, and develops strategies to cope with those costs. LIFT successfully reduced FT and improved care access in a preliminary study among patients with high levels of FT in a single large academic cancer center. Adapting LIFT requires distinguishing between core functions (components that are key to its implementation and effectiveness) and forms (specific activities that carry out core functions). Our objective was to complete the first stage of adaptation, identifying LIFT core functions. Methods We reviewed LIFT's protocol and internal standard-operating procedures. We then conducted 45-90 min in-depth interviews, using Kirk's method of identifying core functions, with key LIFT staff (N = 8), including the principal investigators. Interviews focused on participant roles and intervention implementation. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Using ATLAS.ti and a codebook based on the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact, we coded interview transcripts. Through thematic analysis, we then identified themes related to LIFT's intervention and implementation core functions. Two report back sessions with interview participants were incorporated to further refine themes. Results Six intervention core functions (i.e., what makes LIFT effective) and five implementation core functions (i.e., what facilitated LIFT's implementation) were identified to be sufficient to reduce FT. Intervention core functions included systematically cataloging knowledge and tracking patient-specific information related to eligibility criteria for FT relief. Repeat contacts between the financial navigator and participant created an ongoing relationship, removing common barriers to accessing resources. Implementation core functions included having engaged sites with the resources and willingness necessary to implement FN. Developing navigators' capabilities to implement LIFT-through training, an established case management system, and connections to peer navigators-were also identified as implementation core functions. Conclusion This study adds to the growing evidence on FN by characterizing intervention and implementation core functions, a critical step toward promoting LIFT's implementation and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Cheyenne R Wagi
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Michelle L Manning
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mindy Gellin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Neda Padilla
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Cindy Rogers
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Julia Rodriguez
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin B Biddell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Carla Strom
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Ronny Antonio Bell
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abrams HR, Durbin S, Huang CX, Johnson SF, Nayak RK, Zahner GJ, Peppercorn J. Financial toxicity in cancer care: origins, impact, and solutions. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:2043-2054. [PMID: 34850932 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that can arise for patients, and their family members, as a result of cancer treatment. It includes direct out-of-pocket costs for treatment and indirect costs such as travel, time, and changes to employment that can increase the burden of cancer. While high costs of cancer care have threatened the sustainability of access to care for decades, it is only in the past 10 years that the term "financial toxicity" has been popularized to recognize that the financial burdens of care can be just as important as the physical toxicities traditionally associated with cancer therapy. The past decade has seen a rapid growth in research identifying the prevalence and impact of financial toxicity. Research is now beginning to focus on innovations in screening and care delivery that can mitigate this risk. There is a need to determine the optimal strategy for clinicians and cancer centers to address costs of care in order to minimize financial toxicity, promote access to high value care, and reduce health disparities. We review the evolution of concerns over costs of cancer care, the impact of financial burdens on patients, methods to screen for financial toxicity, proposed solutions, and priorities for future research to identify and address costs that threaten the health and quality of life for many patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah R Abrams
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sienna Durbin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cher X Huang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Rahul K Nayak
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Greg J Zahner
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Taparra K, Fitzsimmons A, Frankki S, De Wall A, Chino F, Peters A. Health care costs for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a Wisconsin community-based hospital study between 2005 and 2020. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1703-1713. [PMID: 34564776 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06584-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer are at risk of high cumulative healthcare system costs potentially associated with poor health and financial outcomes. Although this has been studied at academic centers, little data on AYA costs at community-based practices exist. The goals of this study were to understand direct health care costs for AYA patients, identify factors for high costs, and assess how total health care costs may relate to survival. METHODS AYA patients (15-39 years) treated at a community hospital in Wisconsin (USA) between 2005 and 2020 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, therapies, support services, and all direct health care charges (including up to 1 year prior to diagnosis to capture any diagnostic workup) were collected. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression models identified factors associated with high costs and survival, respectively. RESULTS The 388 AYA patients had a median follow-up of 9 years (97% survival). Most were 30-39 years (62%), female (61%), white (95%), diagnosed early-stage (85%), and underwent surgery (83%). Complete health care costs were available for 233 patients (60%). Median total costs per patient were $123 K (range, $73-$215 K). On adjusted analysis, higher direct health care costs (> $125 K) were associated with greater odds of hospital admissions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.35-2.27), chemotherapy (OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.44-12.70), and breast cancer diagnosis (OR = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.07-14.70). Living farther from the hospital (OR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.02-0.50), later year of diagnosis (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.55-0.77), and uninsured/unknown insurance status (OR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.57) were associated with decreased odds of having higher health care costs. On adjusted analysis, death was associated with greater odds of higher direct health care costs per $125 K (hazards ratio [HR] = 7.9, 95% CI = 2.22-27.80) and radiation (HR = 31.8, 95% CI = 3.15-321) but lower odds of hormone therapy (HR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.01-0.72) and later year of diagnosis (HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.12-0.60). CONCLUSION High direct health care costs among AYA patients are associated with hospital admissions, chemotherapy, breast cancer diagnosis, hospital proximity, and earlier year of diagnosis. Death was associated with high direct health care costs, earlier years of diagnosis, and radiation therapy. Total health care costs in community-based hospitals should be considered in the context of AYA patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kekoa Taparra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. .,Transitional Year Residency Program, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA.
| | - Alec Fitzsimmons
- Department of Research, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Susan Frankki
- Department of Research, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Andrea De Wall
- Department of Research, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antoinette Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ginossar T, Rishel Brakey H, Sussman AL, Price B, Kano M, Davis S, Blair CK. "You're Going to Have to Think a Little Bit Different" Barriers and Facilitators to Using mHealth to Increase Physical Activity among Older, Rural Cancer Survivors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:8929. [PMID: 34501517 PMCID: PMC8430471 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18178929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Wearable activity trackers (WATs) hold great promise in increasing physical activity among older cancer survivors. However, older cancer survivors who reside in rural regions are at increased risk of being digitally marginalized. The goal of this study was to learn about WATs adoption motivation and needs of rural older cancer survivors who live in New Mexico, one of the most rural states with the lowest broadband Internet connectivity in the United States. We conducted six key informant interviews and recruited 31 older cancer survivors from rural counties statewide who participated in interviews and focus groups. Our results show great interest in using WATs as part of an intervention to alleviate barriers associated with the digital divide. Participants were offered diverse modalities to support them in adoption of the trackers. These results will be used to inform future interventions and policies focusing on increasing physical activity in older cancer survivors who reside in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Ginossar
- Department of Communication and Journalism, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA; (A.L.S.); (M.K.); (C.K.B.)
| | - Heidi Rishel Brakey
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Health Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
| | - Andrew L. Sussman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA; (A.L.S.); (M.K.); (C.K.B.)
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Brittany Price
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | - Miria Kano
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA; (A.L.S.); (M.K.); (C.K.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Sally Davis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
- University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Cindy K. Blair
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA; (A.L.S.); (M.K.); (C.K.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jiang CY, Strohbehn GW, Dedinsky RM, Raupp SM, Pannecouk BM, Yentz SE, Ramnath N. Teleoncology for Veterans: High Patient Satisfaction Coupled With Positive Financial and Environmental Impacts. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e1362-e1374. [PMID: 34406817 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There was rapid adoption of teleoncology care in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic. One third of 9 million Veterans Health Administration enrolled Veterans live in rural areas. Although digital solutions can expand capacity, enhance care access, and reduce financial burden, they may also exacerbate rural-urban health disparities. Careful evaluation of patients' perceptions and policy tradeoffs are necessary to optimize teleoncology postpandemic. METHODS Patients with ≥ 1 teleoncology visit with medical, surgical, or radiation oncology between March 2020 and June 2020 were identified retrospectively. Validated, Likert-type survey assessing patient satisfaction was developed. Follow-up survey was conducted on patients with ≥ 1 teleoncology visit from August 2020 to January 2021. Travel distance, time, cost, and carbon dioxide emissions were calculated based on zip codes. RESULTS A hundred surveys were completed (response rate, 62%). Patients overall were satisfied with teleoncology (83% Agree or Strongly Agree) but felt less satisfied than in-person visits (47% Agree or Strongly Agree). Audiovisual component improved patient perception of involvement in care, ability to self-manage health or medical needs, and comparability to in-person visits. Follow-up survey demonstrated similar satisfaction. Total travel-related savings are as follows: 86,470 miles, 84,374 minutes, $49,720 US dollars, and 35.5 metric tons of carbon dioxide. CONCLUSION Veterans are broadly satisfied with teleoncology. Audiovisual capabilities are critical to satisfaction. This is challenging for rural populations with lack of technology access. Patients experienced financial and time savings, and society benefitted from reduced carbon emissions. Continued optimization is needed to enhance patient experience and address secondary effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Y Jiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Garth W Strohbehn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.,Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI.,VA Center for Clinical Management and Research, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Rachel M Dedinsky
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Shelby M Raupp
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Brittany M Pannecouk
- Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sarah E Yentz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.,Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nithya Ramnath
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.,Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center (VA Ann Arbor Health System), Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
van der Kruk SR, Butow P, Mesters I, Boyle T, Olver I, White K, Sabesan S, Zielinski R, Chan BA, Spronk K, Grimison P, Underhill C, Kirsten L, Gunn KM. Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1021-1064. [PMID: 34392413 PMCID: PMC8364415 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06440-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries. Methods Eligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764). Results Sixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group. Conclusion Recent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannen R. van der Kruk
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Australian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Ilse Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Terry Boyle
- Australian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Kate White
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Sabe Sabesan
- College of Medicine and Dentistry (CMD), James Cook University, QLD, Townsville, Australia
| | - Rob Zielinski
- Central West Cancer Care Centre, Orange Base Hospital, Orange, NSW Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Bryan A. Chan
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Kristiaan Spronk
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | | | | | - Kate M. Gunn
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Construction of Rural Financial Organization Spatial Structure and Service Management Model Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 2021:7974175. [PMID: 34326870 PMCID: PMC8277516 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7974175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Local credit cooperatives have long played an important role in local financial services. It has made a significant contribution to agricultural production, farmers' incomes, and the economic development of rural areas. In particular, as a financial instrument serving farmers, microfinance management by local credit cooperatives plays a key role in pursuing profits and fulfilling social responsibility. It was therefore important to obtain effective instruments for combating poverty in rural areas from all walks of society. This paper first outlines the development of microfinance loans in Germany and other countries and describes the current situation and some of the challenges facing local credit cooperatives in financial management. Next, we present the basic concepts of data mining, describe the common methods and key techniques of data mining, analyze and compare the properties of the individual data, and show how the associated mining can actually be performed. Next, we will explain the basic model of microfinance for farmers and some risks in detail and analyze and evaluate the characteristics of these risks in the context of local credit cooperatives. As a result, this paper proposes an improved deep convolutional neural network. The optimized algorithm selects the optimal weight threshold value and different iteration times. The results are fewer errors, the results are closer to the correct data, and the efficiency is better than before. The algorithm is more efficient because errors have been greatly reduced and the time spent on them has been slightly reduced.
Collapse
|
46
|
Noyd DH, Neely NB, Schroeder KM, Lantos PM, Power S, Kreissman SG, Oeffinger KC. Integration of cancer registry and electronic health record data to construct a childhood cancer survivorship cohort, facilitate risk stratification for late effects, and assess appropriate follow-up care. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29014. [PMID: 33742534 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective study harnessed an institutional cancer registry to construct a childhood cancer survivorship cohort, integrate electronic health record (EHR) and geospatial data to stratify survivors based on late-effect risk, analyze follow-up care patterns, and determine factors associated with suboptimal follow-up care. PROCEDURE The survivorship cohort included patients ≤18 years of age reported to the institutional cancer registry between January 1, 1994 and November 30, 2012. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third revision (ICD-O-3) coding and treatment exposures facilitated risk stratification of survivors. The EHR was linked to the cancer registry based on medical record number (MRN) to extract clinic visits. RESULTS Five hundred and ninety pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) and 275 pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) survivors were included in the final analytic cohort. Two hundred and eight-two survivors (32.6%) were not seen in any oncology-related subspecialty clinic at Duke 5-7 years after initial diagnosis. Factors associated with follow-up included age (p = .008), diagnosis (p < .001), race/ethnicity (p = .010), late-effect risk strata (p = .001), distance to treatment center (p < .0001), and area deprivation index (ADI) (p = .011). Multivariable logistic modeling attenuated the association for high-risk (OR 1.72; 95% CI 0.805, 3.66) and intermediate-risk (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.644, 2.36) survivors compared to survivors at low risk of late effects among the PHO cohort. PNO survivors at high risk for late effects were more likely to follow up (adjusted OR 3.66; 95% CI 1.76, 7.61). CONCLUSIONS Nearly a third of survivors received suboptimal follow-up care. This study provides a reproducible model to integrate cancer registry and EHR data to construct risk-stratified survivorship cohorts to assess follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Noyd
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kristin M Schroeder
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul M Lantos
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Community/Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Steve Power
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan G Kreissman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lopez AM, Lam K, Thota R. Barriers and Facilitators to Telemedicine: Can You Hear Me Now? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:25-36. [PMID: 34010056 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
In its most direct interpretation, telemedicine is medical care provided at a distance. Although telemedicine's use had been steadily increasing, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted an unprecedented interest and urgency among patients, health care professionals, and policymakers to facilitate health care devoid of the need for in-person contact. The growth in personal access to telecommunications technology meant an unprecedented number of people in the United States and around the world had access to the equipment and technology that would make virtual care possible from the home. As the mass implementation of telemedicine unfolded, it became quickly apparent that scaling up the use of telemedicine presented considerable new challenges, some of which worsened disparities. This article describes those challenges by examining the history of telemedicine, its role in both supporting access and creating new barriers to access in trying to get everyone connected, frameworks for thinking about those barriers, and facilitators that may help overcome them, with a particular focus on older adults and patients with cancer in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Maria Lopez
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kenneth Lam
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Financial hardship among cancer survivors in Southern New Jersey. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:6613-6623. [PMID: 33945015 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06232-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify predictors of financial hardship, operationalized as foregoing health care, making financial sacrifices, and being concerned about having inadequate financial and insurance information. METHODS Cancer survivors (n = 346) identified through the New Jersey State Cancer Registry were surveyed from August 2018 to September 2019. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Cancer survivors with household incomes less than $50,000 annually were more likely than those earning $50,0000-$90,000 to report foregoing health care (15.8 percentage points, p < 0.05). Compared to retirees, survivors who were currently unemployed, disabled, or were homemakers were more likely to forego doctor's visits (11.4 percentage points, p < 0.05), more likely to report borrowing money (16.1 percentage points, p < 0.01), and more likely to report wanting health insurance information (25.7 percentage points, p < 0.01). Employed survivors were more likely than retirees to forego health care (16.8 percentage points, p < 0.05) and make financial sacrifices (20.0 percentage points, p < 0.01). Survivors who never went to college were 9.8 percentage points (p < 0.05) more likely to borrow money compared to college graduates. Black survivors were more likely to want information about dealing with financial and insurance issues (p < 0.01); men were more likely to forego health care (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Findings highlight the role of employment status and suggest that education, income, race, and gender also shape cancer survivors' experience of financial hardship. There is a need to refine and extend financial navigation programs. For employed survivors, strengthening family leave policies would be desirable.
Collapse
|
49
|
Xu H, Kadambi S, Mohile SG, Yang S, Kehoe LA, Wells M, Culakova E, Kamen C, Obrecht S, Mohamed M, Gilmore NJ, Magnuson A, Grossman VA, Hopkins JO, Geer J, Berenberg J, Mustian K, Cupertino A, Mohile N, Loh KP. Caregiving burden of informal caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer: The effects of rurality and education. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1015-1021. [PMID: 33858803 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rural-urban disparities in the experiences of caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer may exist. This study examined factors associated with caregiver mastery and burden and explored whether rural-urban disparities in caregiver outcomes differed by education. MATERIALS AND METHODS Longitudinal data (baseline, 4-6 weeks, and 3 months) on caregivers of older adults (≥ 70) with advanced cancer were obtained from a multicenter geriatric assessment (GA) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02107443). Rurality was determined based on 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Caregivers' education was categorized as ≥ some college vs ≤ high school. Caregiver outcomes included Ryff Environmental Mastery (scored 7-35) and Caregiver Reaction Assessment (including self-esteem, disrupted schedules, financial problems, lack of social support, and health problems; each scored 1-5). Separate linear mixed models with interaction term of education and rurality were performed. RESULTS Of 414 caregivers, 64 (15.5%) were from rural areas and 263 (63.5%) completed ≥ some college. Rurality was significantly associated with more disrupted schedules (β = 0.21), financial problems (β = 0.17), and lack of social support (β = 0.11). A significant interaction between education and rurality was found, with rurality associated with lower mastery (β = -1.27) and more disrupted schedule (β = 0.25), financial problems (β = 0.33), and lack of social support (β = 0.32) among caregivers with education ≤ high school. CONCLUSION Our study identifies subgroups of caregivers who are vulnerable to caregiving burden, specifically those from rural areas and with lower education. Multifaceted interventions are needed to improve caregivers' competency and reduce caregiving burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiwen Xu
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Sindhuja Kadambi
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Shuhan Yang
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Lee A Kehoe
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Megan Wells
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Charles Kamen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Spencer Obrecht
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Mostafa Mohamed
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Nikesha J Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA; James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | | | - Judith O Hopkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park, MN, USA.
| | | | - Karen Mustian
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Anapaula Cupertino
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Nimish Mohile
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lu AD, Zheng Z, Han X, Qi R, Zhao J, Yabroff KR, Nathan PC. Medical Financial Hardship in Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:997-1004. [PMID: 33839786 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and its treatment can result in lifelong medical financial hardship, which we aimed to describe among adult survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers in the United States. METHODS We identified adult (aged ≥18 years) survivors of AYA cancers (diagnosed ages 15-39 years) and adults without a cancer history from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Surveys. Proportions of respondents reporting measures in different hardship domains (material [eg, problems paying bills], psychological [eg, distress], and behavioral [eg, forgoing care due to cost]) were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression models and hardship intensity (cooccurrence of hardship domains) using ordinal logistic regression. Cost-related changes in prescription medication use were assessed separately. RESULTS A total of 2588 AYA cancer survivors (median = 31 [interquartile range = 26-35] years at diagnosis; 75.0% more than 6 years and 50.0% more than 16 years since diagnosis) and 256 964 adults without a cancer history were identified. Survivors were more likely to report at least 1 hardship measure in material (36.7% vs 27.7%, P < .001) and behavioral (28.4% vs 21.2%, P < .001) domains, hardship in all 3 domains (13.1% vs 8.7%, P < .001), and at least 1 cost-related prescription medication nonadherence (13.7% vs 10.3%, P = .001) behavior. CONCLUSIONS Adult survivors of AYA cancers are more likely to experience medical financial hardship across multiple domains compared with adults without a cancer history. Health-care providers must recognize this inequity and its impact on survivors' health, and multifaceted interventions are necessary to address underlying causes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Lu
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ruowen Qi
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|