1
|
Turner K, Nguyen OT, Islam JY, Rajasekhara S, Martinez YC, Tabriz AA, Gonzalez BD, Jim HSL, Egan KM. Patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms: a cross-sectional study. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:298-304. [PMID: 39108232 PMCID: PMC11303860 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been limited study regarding patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. To address this gap, this study assesses the determinants and prevalence of patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. METHODS Individuals who completed cancer treatment from July 2017 to December 2019 were invited to participate in a survey regarding medical cannabis. An electronic survey was administered in English and Spanish from August to November 2021 and completed by 1592 individuals (response rate = 17.6%). RESULTS About one-third (33.5%) of participants reported discussing medical cannabis for cancer symptom management with a health-care provider. Controlling for other factors, individuals with malnutrition and/or cachexia had higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50 to 3.53) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without malnutrition and/or cachexia. Similarly, individuals with nausea had higher odds (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.44 to 2.61) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without nausea. A smaller percentage (15.6%) of participants reported receiving a recommendation for medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. Among individuals who reported using cannabis, a little over one-third (36.1%) reported not receiving instructions from anyone on how to use cannabis or determine how much to take. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our study suggests that patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management is limited. As interest and use of medical cannabis continues to grow among cancer patients, there is a need to ensure patients have access to high quality patient-provider communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Oliver T Nguyen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Y Islam
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sahana Rajasekhara
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yessica C Martinez
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Braun IM, Bohlke K, Abrams DI, Anderson H, Balneaves LG, Bar-Sela G, Bowles DW, Chai PR, Damani A, Gupta A, Hallmeyer S, Subbiah IM, Twelves C, Wallace MS, Roeland EJ. Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1575-1593. [PMID: 38478773 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To guide clinicians, adults with cancer, caregivers, researchers, and oncology institutions on the medical use of cannabis and cannabinoids, including synthetic cannabinoids and herbal cannabis derivatives; single, purified cannabinoids; combinations of cannabis ingredients; and full-spectrum cannabis. METHODS A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of cannabis and cannabinoids when used by adults with cancer. Outcomes of interest included antineoplastic effects, cancer treatment toxicity, symptoms, and quality of life. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 27, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS The evidence base consisted of 13 systematic reviews and five additional primary studies (four RCTs and one cohort study). The certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low or very low. RECOMMENDATIONS Cannabis and/or cannabinoid access and use by adults with cancer has outpaced the science supporting their clinical use. This guideline provides strategies for open, nonjudgmental communication between clinicians and adults with cancer about the use of cannabis and/or cannabinoids. Clinicians should recommend against using cannabis or cannabinoids as a cancer-directed treatment unless within the context of a clinical trial. Cannabis and/or cannabinoids may improve refractory, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting when added to guideline-concordant antiemetic regimens. Whether cannabis and/or cannabinoids can improve other supportive care outcomes remains uncertain. This guideline also highlights the critical need for more cannabis and/or cannabinoid research.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana M Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kari Bohlke
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Donald I Abrams
- University of California San Francisco Osher Center for Integrative Health, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anuja Damani
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | | | | | | | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Eric J Roeland
- Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuzumi A, Yamashita T, Fukasawa T, Yoshizaki-Ogawa A, Sato S, Yoshizaki A. Cannabinoids for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases: A systematic review. Exp Dermatol 2024; 33:e15064. [PMID: 38532572 DOI: 10.1111/exd.15064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, the medical use of cannabinoids has attracted growing attention worldwide. In particular, anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids led to their emergence as potential therapeutic options for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Recent studies have also shown that cannabinoid receptors are widely expressed and have endogenous ligands in the skin, suggesting that the skin has its own endocannabinoid system. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential therapeutic effects of cannabinoids in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases. Following an overview of cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system, we describe the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cannabinoids in skin health and disease. We then review the clinical studies of cannabinoids in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases including systemic sclerosis (SSc), dermatomyositis (DM), psoriasis (Pso) and atopic dermatitis (AD). A primary literature search was conducted in July 2023, using PubMed and Web of Science. A total of 15 articles were included after excluding reviews, non-human studies and in vitro studies from 389 non-duplicated articles. Available evidence suggests that cannabinoids may be beneficial for SSc, DM, Pso and AD. However, further studies, ideally randomized controlled trials, are needed to further evaluate the use of cannabinoids in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Kuzumi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamashita
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takemichi Fukasawa
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Cannabinoid Research, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Asako Yoshizaki-Ogawa
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sato
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Yoshizaki
- Department of Dermatology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Cannabinoid Research, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vieira C, Bergantim R, Madureira E, Barroso JC, Labareda M, Parreira ST, Castro A, Macedo A, Custódio S. Portuguese consensus on the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by cancer treatments. Porto Biomed J 2023; 8:e234. [PMID: 37846304 PMCID: PMC10575355 DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) strongly affect the quality of life of patients with cancer. Inadequate antiemetic control leads to the decline of patients' quality of life, increases rescue interventions, and may even compromise adherence to cancer treatment. Although there are international recommendations for controlling CINV and RINV, these recommendations focus mainly on pharmacological management, with scarce information on additional measures that patients may adopt. Moreover, the prophylaxis and management of CINV/RINV are not always applied. Thus, we identified the need to systematize the strategies for preventing and managing CINV/RINV and the associated risk factors to implement and promote effective prophylactic antiemetic regimens therapy in patients with cancer. This review sought to create a set of practical recommendations for managing and controlling CINV/RINV, according to the current international recommendations for antiemetic therapy and the main risk factors. Conclusively, we intended to produce a patient-centered guidance document for health care professionals focused on the awareness, monitoring, and treatment of CINV/RINV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cláudia Vieira
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO-PORTO), Porto, Portugal
- Research Center, Molecular Oncology Group, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO-PORTO), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Oncologia, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Bergantim
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal
- i3S—Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Department of Hematology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Elsa Madureira
- Associação de Investigação de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AICSO), Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- Department of Nutrition, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Juan C.M. Barroso
- Medical Oncology Service, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal
- iOncoCare - International Group for Oncologic Supportive Care Study, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Sara T. Parreira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital CUF Tejo, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Castro
- Department of Pharmacy, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte—Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Macedo
- Evidenze, Lisboa, Portugal
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Sandra Custódio
- Associação de Investigação de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AICSO), Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- Medical Oncology Service, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chow R, Yin LB, Baqri W, Huang R, Boldt G, Younus J, Lock M, Prsic E, Zimmermann C, Herrstedt J. Prevalence and predictors of long-delayed (> 120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)-a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:505. [PMID: 37535218 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07978-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although there have been reports of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) beyond 120 h, its overall prevalence has not been systematically examined. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to report on the prevalence of this long-delayed CINV. METHODS This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022346963). PubMed (Medline), Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until August 2022. Articles were included if they reported on CINV > 120 h after initiation of the chemotherapy regimen and patients received a single-agent highly emetogenic (HEC) or moderately emetogenic (MEC) antineoplastic agent for 1 day alone or in combination with low/minimal emetogenic chemotherapy. For all eligible articles, individual study authors were contacted and requested to provide individual patient-level data of demographics, emetogenicity of chemotherapy regimens, and daily incidence of nausea and vomiting. Forward stepwise logistic regression identified predictors for the incident day's CINV based on prior day's CINV episodes, controlling for patient demographics, and stratified by regimen emetogenicity. RESULTS A total of 2048 patients from 2 studies were included in this individual patient data meta-analysis: 1333 patients (65%) received HEC and 715 (35%) received MEC. Among those receiving HEC, 325 (24%) experienced acute, 652 (49%) delayed, and 393 (31%) long-delayed nausea; 107 (8%) experienced acute, 179 (14%) delayed, and 79 (6%) long-delayed vomiting. Among those receiving MEC, 48 (7%) experienced acute, 272 (38%) delayed, and 167 (24%) long-delayed nausea; 12 (2%) experienced acute, 97 (14%) delayed, and 42 (6%) long-delayed vomiting. Nausea in the long-delayed phase was as severe as in the delayed phase. Patients experiencing nausea and vomiting on days 4 and 5 were at significant risk of experiencing long-delayed CINV. CONCLUSION While not as prevalent as delayed nausea and vomiting, long-delayed CINV affects a significant proportion of patients and severity is similar. Patients with delayed CINV, specifically on days 4-5, are at risk of experiencing long-delayed CINV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Leyi Bellinda Yin
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wafa Baqri
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ryan Huang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jawaid Younus
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Prsic
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Breemen RB, Simchuk D. Antiviral activities of hemp cannabinoids. Clin Sci (Lond) 2023; 137:633-643. [PMID: 37083031 PMCID: PMC10133872 DOI: 10.1042/cs20220193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Hemp is an understudied source of pharmacologically active compounds and many unique plant secondary metabolites including more than 100 cannabinoids. After years of legal restriction, research on hemp has recently demonstrated antiviral activities in silico, in vitro, and in vivo for cannabidiol (CBD), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), cannabigerolic acid (CBGA), and several other cannabinoids against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and γ-herpes viruses. Mechanisms of action include inhibition of viral cell entry, inhibition of viral proteases, and stimulation of cellular innate immune responses. The anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids are also under investigation for mitigating the cytokine storm of COVID-19 and controlling chronic inflammation in people living with HIV. Retrospective clinical studies support antiviral activities of CBD, Δ9-THC, and cannabinoid mixtures as do some prospective clinical trials, but appropriately designed clinical trials of safety and efficacy of antiviral cannabinoids are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B van Breemen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Linus Pauling Institute, Global Hemp Innovation Center, Oregon State University, 2900 SW Campus Drive, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | - Daniel Simchuk
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Linus Pauling Institute, Global Hemp Innovation Center, Oregon State University, 2900 SW Campus Drive, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aran A, Harel M, Ovadia A, Shalgy S, Cayam-Rand D. Mediators of Placebo Response to Cannabinoid Treatment in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093098. [PMID: 37176538 PMCID: PMC10179251 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The placebo response has a substantial impact on treatment outcome. However, data regarding mediators of the placebo response in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are sparse. This retrospective study investigated possible mediators of the placebo response among participants of a placebo-controlled trial of cannabinoid treatment for behavioral problems in children with ASD (CBA trial, age 5-21 years). We used a specifically designed questionnaire to explore possible mediators of the placebo response in 88 participants of the CBA trial who received a placebo and had valid outcome scores. The parents of 67 participants completed the questionnaire. The placebo response was positively associated with the child's comprehension of the treatment purpose (p = 0.037). There was also a trend for participants who had a relative aggravation of symptoms before treatment onset to improve following placebo treatment (p = 0.053). No other domains, including parental expectations, previous positive experience with similar treatments (behavioral conditioning), parental locus of control, quality of the patient-physician relationships, and adherence to study medications were associated with placebo-response. This finding suggests that efforts to explain the treatment purpose to children with disabilities may enhance treatment efficacy in clinical practice and decrease differences in the placebo response between study arms. Contrary to our hypothesis, parental expectations regarding cannabinoid treatment were not associated with the placebo response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Aran
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Moria Harel
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel
| | - Aminadav Ovadia
- Psychology Department, Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel
| | - Shulamit Shalgy
- Psychology Department, Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley 1930600, Israel
| | - Dalit Cayam-Rand
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
To J, Davis M, Sbrana A, Alderman B, Hui D, Mukhopadhyay S, Bouleuc C, Case AA, Amano K, Crawford GB, de Feo G, Tanco K, Garsed J. MASCC guideline: cannabis for cancer-related pain and risk of harms and adverse events. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:202. [PMID: 36872397 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07662-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 18% of patients with cancer use cannabis at one time as palliation or treatment for their cancer. We performed a systematic review of randomized cannabis cancer trials to establish a guideline for its use in pain and to summarize the risk of harm and adverse events when used for any indication in cancer patients. METHODS A systematic review of randomized trials with or without meta-analysis was carried out from MEDLINE, CCTR, Embase, and PsychINFO. The search involved randomized trials of cannabis in cancer patients. The search ended on November 12, 2021. The Jadad grading system was used for grading quality. Inclusion criteria for articles were randomized trials or systematic reviews of randomized trials of cannabinoids versus either placebo or active comparator explicitly in adult patients with cancer. RESULTS Thirty-four systematic reviews and randomized trials met the eligibility criteria for cancer pain. Seven were randomized trials involving patients with cancer pain. Two trials had positive primary endpoints, which could not be reproduced in similarly designed trials. High-quality systematic reviews with meta-analyses found little evidence that cannabinoids are an effective adjuvant or analgesic to cancer pain. Seven systematic reviews and randomized trials related to harms and adverse events were included. There was inconsistent evidence about the types and levels of harm patients may experience when using cannabinoids. CONCLUSION The MASCC panel recommends against the use of cannabinoids as an adjuvant analgesic for cancer pain and suggests that the potential risk of harm and adverse events be carefully considered for all cancer patients, particularly with treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine To
- Division of Aged Care, Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mellar Davis
- Palliative Care Department, Geisinger Medical System, Danville, USA.
| | | | | | - David Hui
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Carole Bouleuc
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, P.S.L. University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Amy A Case
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, USA
| | - Koji Amano
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gregory B Crawford
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Kimberson Tanco
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alderman B, Hui D, Mukhopadhyay S, Bouleuc C, Case AA, Amano K, Crawford GB, de Feo G, Sbrana A, Tanco K, To J, Garsed J, Davis M. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) expert opinion/consensus guidance on the use of cannabinoids for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:39. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07480-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
10
|
Approach the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in older patients with care. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-022-00952-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
11
|
Patel P, Robinson PD, Wahib N, Cheung P, Wong T, Cabral S, Parker A, Cohen M, Devine K, Gibson P, Holdsworth MT, Neumann E, Orsey A, Phillips R, Spinelli D, Thackray J, van de Wetering M, Woods D, Sung L, Dupuis LL. Interventions for the prevention of acute phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adult and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:8855-8869. [PMID: 35953731 PMCID: PMC10153509 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify effective and safe interventions to prevent acute phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials evaluating interventions to prevent acute CINV. Outcomes assessed were complete chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) control, complete chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) control, complete CINV control, and discontinuation of antiemetics due to adverse effects. RESULTS The search identified 65,172 citations; 744 were evaluated at full-text, and 295 (25 pediatric) met eligibility criteria. In patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), complete CIV (risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.44) and CIN (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.62) control improved when olanzapine was added. The addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA) to a corticosteroid plus a serotonin-3 receptor antagonist (5HT3RA) also improved complete CIV (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.14) and CIN (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) control. Compared to granisetron/ondansetron, palonosetron provided improved complete CIV control when the 5HT3RA was given alone or when combined with dexamethasone. In patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), dexamethasone plus a 5HT3RA improved complete CIV control compared to a 5HT3RA alone (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.21-1.39). Only a single meta-analysis evaluating the safety outcome was possible. CONCLUSIONS For patients receiving HEC, various antiemetic regimens improved CIV and CIN control. For patients receiving MEC, administration of a 5HT3RA plus dexamethasone improved CIV control. Analysis of antiemetic safety was constrained by lack of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Patel
- Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Nora Wahib
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Thomas Wong
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sandra Cabral
- Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Katie Devine
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Paul Gibson
- Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Eloise Neumann
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrea Orsey
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA
| | - Robert Phillips
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Jennifer Thackray
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Deborah Woods
- Davis Health, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Lillian Sung
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - L Lee Dupuis
- Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stoner MJ, Dietrich A, Lam SH, Wall JJ, Sulton C, Rose E. Marijuana use in children: An update focusing on pediatric tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol use. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2022; 3:e12770. [PMID: 35813522 PMCID: PMC9255894 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Stoner
- Department of Pediatrics Division of Emergency Medicine Nationwide Children's Hospital The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Ann Dietrich
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine Prisma University of South Carolina College of Medicine Columbia South Carolina USA
| | | | - Jessica J. Wall
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA
| | - Carmen Sulton
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Eagleton Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
| | - Emily Rose
- Department of Clinical Medicine Emergency Medicine (Educational Scholar) Department of Emergency Medicine Los Angeles County & USC Medical Center Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schnapp A, Harel M, Cayam-Rand D, Cassuto H, Polyansky L, Aran A. A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Cannabinoid Treatment for Disruptive Behavior in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Effects on Sleep Parameters as Measured by the CSHQ. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071685. [PMID: 35884990 PMCID: PMC9312464 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often associated with debilitating sleep disturbances. While anecdotal evidence suggests the positive effect of cannabinoids, randomized studies are lacking. Here, we report the effects of cannabinoid treatment on the sleep of 150 children and adolescents with ASD, as part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study that assessed the impact of cannabinoid treatment on behavior (NCT02956226). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatments: (1) whole-plant cannabis extract, containing cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in a 20:1 ratio, (2) purified CBD and THC extract in the same ratio, and (3) an oral placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment (Period 1) and a 4-week washout period, participants crossed over to a predetermined, second 12-week treatment (Period 2). Sleep disturbances were assessed using the Children’s Sleep-Habit Questionnaire (CSHQ). We found that the CBD-rich cannabinoid treatment was not superior to the placebo treatment in all aspects of sleep measured by the CSHQ, including bedtime resistance, sleep-onset delay, and sleep duration. Notably, regardless of the treatment (cannabinoids or placebo), improvements in the CSHQ total score were associated with improvements in the autistic core symptoms, as indicated by the Social Responsiveness Scale total scores (Period 1: r = 0.266, p = 0.008; Period 2: r = 0.309, p = 0.004). While this study failed to demonstrate that sleep improvements were higher with cannabinoids than they were with the placebo treatment, further studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad Schnapp
- Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel;
| | - Moria Harel
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel; (M.H.); (D.C.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Dalit Cayam-Rand
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel; (M.H.); (D.C.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Hanoch Cassuto
- Child Development Centers, Leumit Health Services, Jerusalem 9439221, Israel;
| | - Lola Polyansky
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel; (M.H.); (D.C.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Adi Aran
- Neuropediatric Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel; (M.H.); (D.C.-R.); (L.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Oelen Y, Revenberg S, de Vos-Geelen J, van Geel R, Schoenmaekers J, van den Beuken-Everdingen M, Valkenburg-van Iersel L. Cannabinoid consumption among cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment in the Netherlands. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 149:1863-1872. [PMID: 35779108 PMCID: PMC10097765 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the inconclusiveness regarding health effects of cannabinoids among cancer patients, studies from non-European countries suggest that the medical-intended consumption of such products by this patient group is significant. The current study analyses cannabinoid usage among oncology patients receiving systemic treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS The current study included adult patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy at Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, for a solid malignancy. Participants were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire including questions on demographic variables, clinical variables and cannabinoid consumption. RESULTS A total of 153 patients with solid cancer were included in this study. Almost 25% reported usage of cannabinoids for medical purposes, with 15% of the patients currently using the substance. Additionally, 18% of non-users considered future medical usage. In 48% of the cases, consumption was reported by the oncologist. The proposed anti-cancer effect was reported by 46% of the users as motivation for consumption. Current users were mainly palliative patients and 54% of the users were undergoing immunotherapy. Intention of treatment and type of therapy were predictive factors for consumption. Cannabinoid-oil was the most frequently used way of consumption. CONCLUSION This study underlines the high number of cannabinoid users among oncology patients in the Netherlands in presumed absence of clinical guidance. It highlights the essence of a pro-active role of the clinician, assessing cannabinoid usage and educating the patients on the most recent evidence regarding its potential benefits and risks. Further studies on clinical decision making and efficacy of cannabinoids are recommended, to improve clinical guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yrina Oelen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sven Revenberg
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robin van Geel
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janna Schoenmaekers
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Liselot Valkenburg-van Iersel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Souza MR, Henriques AT, Limberger RP. Medical cannabis regulation: an overview of models around the world with emphasis on the Brazilian scenario. J Cannabis Res 2022; 4:33. [PMID: 35710586 PMCID: PMC9202119 DOI: 10.1186/s42238-022-00142-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cannabis sativa has accompanied humankind since ancient times, permeating the most diverse aspects of its existence, among which the search for health promotion and well-being stands out. Nevertheless, during the twentieth century, a series of restrictions and controls have been adopted internationally to prevent the abusive use of this species. Despite that, there has been an increased demand for the medical use of cannabis and its derivatives in the last few decades, especially among patients with debilitating conditions for which the existing therapeutic alternatives are limited. Accordingly, several countries have adopted regulatory strategies to allow access to cannabis-based products. This study aimed to overview the existing regulatory frameworks for medical cannabis around the world, focusing on the current Brazilian scenario. In addition to supply and access regulation aspects, some quality-related issues regarding cannabis-based pharmaceutical products were addressed, with emphasis on risks to patients. The literature research was performed between October 2020 and March 2021. According to the retrieved information, by the time the data collection was completed, thirty-six countries had already implemented regulatory frameworks regarding medical cannabis, and sixteen countries had models under development or in the process of implementation. The characteristics of the assessed regulatory strategies vary considerably from country to country, reflecting sociocultural, historical, and political aspects. Among the key aspects that differed between the assessed models, one can highlight the type of cannabis products that are made available and the technical requirements applied to them, as well as the possible access mechanisms. Different supply regulation strategies were also observed regarding cannabis cultivation, production licensing, and distribution mechanisms. In Brazil, an evolution of the regulatory framework has been noticeable since 2015, even though pending points are still to be addressed, among which are the species’ cultivation and the access to it for scientific research purposes. Constructing a regulatory model which provides access to good quality cannabis-based medicines that may meet the patient’s needs is still a challenge in the coming years, requiring the engagement of various stakeholders, including regulators, members of the academic community, prescribing professionals, and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maíra Ribeiro de Souza
- Laboratório de Análises e Pesquisas em Toxicologia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, 90610-000, Brazil. .,Laboratório de Farmacognosia e Controle da Qualidade de Fitoterápicos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, 90610-000, Brazil. .,Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Brasília, DF, 71205-050, Brazil.
| | - Amélia Teresinha Henriques
- Laboratório de Farmacognosia e Controle da Qualidade de Fitoterápicos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, 90610-000, Brazil
| | - Renata Pereira Limberger
- Laboratório de Análises e Pesquisas em Toxicologia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, 90610-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jahn F, Wörmann B, Brandt J, Freidank A, Feyer P, Jordan K. The Prevention and Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting During Tumor Therapy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:382-392. [PMID: 35140010 PMCID: PMC9487713 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nausea and vomiting are common and distressing side effects of tumor therapy. Despite prophylaxis, 40-50% of patients suffer from nausea, and 20-30% from vomiting. Antiemetic prophylaxis and treatment are therefore of great importance for improving patients' quality of life and preventing sequelae such as tumor cachexia. METHODS The recommendations presented here are based on international and national guidelines, updated with publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, with special attention to randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that have appeared in the past 5 years since the German clinical practice guideline on supportive therapy was published. RESULTS Risk-adjusted prevention and treatment is based on the identification of treatment-related and patient-specific risk factors, including female sex and younger age. Parenteral tumor therapy is divided into four risk classes (minimal, low, moderate, high), and oral tumor therapy into two (minimal/low, moderate/high). In radiotherapy, the radiation field is of decisive importance. The antiemetic drugs most commonly used are 5-HT3-RA, NK1-RA, and dexamethasone; olanzapine has proven beneficial as an add-on or rescue drug. The use of steroids in patients being treated with drug combinations including checkpoint inhibitors is discussed controversially because of the potentially reduced therapeutic response. Benzodiazepines, dimenhydrinate, and cannabinoids can be used as backup antiemetics. Acupuncture/acupressure, ginger, and progressive muscle relaxation are pos - sible alternative methods. CONCLUSION Detailed, effective, risk profile-adapted algorithms for the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting are now available for patients undergoing classic chemotherapy regimens or combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Optimal symptom control for patients undergoing oral tumor therapy over multiple days in the outpatient setting remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Jahn
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale),*Universitätsklinikum Halle Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin IV Hämatologie/Onkologie, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- Charité Center for ambulant health, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow, Berlin
| | - Juliane Brandt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Annette Freidank
- Pharmacy and Patient Advice Center, Universitätsmedizin Marburg—Campus Fulda
| | | | - Karin Jordan
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cannabis for Rheumatic Disease Pain: a Review of Current Literature. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2022; 24:119-131. [PMID: 35486218 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-022-01065-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Changing attitudes about marijuana have led to an increase in use of medicinal marijuana, especially for painful chronic conditions. Patients ask rheumatologists for guidance on this topic. This review provides up-to-date information on the safety and efficacy of medicinal cannabis for rheumatic disease pain. RECENT FINDINGS The number of publications related to rheumatic disease and cannabis has increased, but recent literature skews heavily toward reviews vs primary research. Data supporting a role for cannabinoids in rheumatic disease continue to grow. Observational and survey studies show increased use of medicinal cannabis, both by people with rheumatic disease and the general population, and suggest that patients find these treatments beneficial. Prospective studies, however, including randomized controlled clinical trials, are rare and sorely needed. As medicinal cannabis use for rheumatic diseases rises, despite lack of evidence, we review the sparse data available and provide tips for conversations about medicinal cannabis for rheumatologists.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bagues A, López-Tofiño Y, Llorente-Berzal Á, Abalo R. Cannabinoid drugs against chemotherapy-induced adverse effects: focus on nausea/vomiting, peripheral neuropathy and chemofog in animal models. Behav Pharmacol 2022; 33:105-129. [PMID: 35045012 DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Although new drugs are being developed for cancer treatment, classical chemotherapeutic agents are still front-line therapies, despite their frequent association with severe side effects that can hamper their use. Cannabinoids may prevent or palliate some of these side effects. The aim of the present study is to review the basic research which has been conducted evaluating the effects of cannabinoid drugs in the treatment of three important side effects induced by classical chemotherapeutic agents: nausea and vomiting, neuropathic pain and cognitive impairment. Several published studies have demonstrated that cannabinoids are useful in preventing and reducing the nausea, vomits and neuropathy induced by different chemotherapy regimens, though other side effects can occur, such as a reduction of gastrointestinal motility, along with psychotropic effects when using centrally-acting cannabinoids. Thus, peripherally-acting cannabinoids and new pharmacological options are being investigated, such as allosteric or biased agonists. Additionally, due to the increase in the survival of cancer patients, there are emerging data that demonstrate an important cognitive deterioration due to chemotherapy, and because the cannabinoid drugs have a neuroprotective effect, they could be useful in preventing chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (as demonstrated through studies in other neurological disorders), but this has not yet been tested. Thus, although cannabinoids seem a promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of different side effects induced by chemotherapeutic agents, future research will be necessary to find pharmacological options with a safer profile. Moreover, a new line of research awaits to be opened to elucidate their possible usefulness in preventing cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Bagues
- Área de Farmacología y Nutrición, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón
- High Performance Research Group in Experimental Pharmacology (PHARMAKOM-URJC)
- Unidad Asociada I+D+i del Instituto de Química Médica (IQM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda López-Tofiño
- Área de Farmacología y Nutrición, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón
- High Performance Research Group in Physiopathology and Pharmacology of the Digestive System NeuGut-URJC
| | - Álvaro Llorente-Berzal
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland
- Centre for Pain Research and Galway Neuroscience Centre, NCBES, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Raquel Abalo
- Área de Farmacología y Nutrición, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón
- Unidad Asociada I+D+i del Instituto de Química Médica (IQM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
- High Performance Research Group in Physiopathology and Pharmacology of the Digestive System NeuGut-URJC
- Grupo de Trabajo de Ciencias Básicas en Dolor y Analgesia de la Sociedad Española del Dolor, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
As medical cannabis becomes legal in more states, cancer patients are
increasingly interested in the potential utility of the ancient
botanical in their treatment regimen. Although eager to discuss
cannabis use with their oncologist, patients often find that their
provider reports that they do not have adequate information to be
helpful. Oncologists, so dependent on evidence-based data to guide
their treatment plans, are dismayed by the lack of published
literature on the benefits of medical cannabis. This results largely
from the significant barriers that have existed to effectively thwart
the ability to conduct trials investigating the potential therapeutic
efficacy of the plant. This is a narrative review aimed at clinicians,
summarizing cannabis phytochemistry, trials in the areas of nausea and
vomiting, appetite, pain and anticancer activity, including assessment
of case reports of antitumor use, with reflective assessments of the
quality and quantity of evidence. Despite preclinical evidence and
social media claims, the utility of cannabis, cannabinoids or
cannabis-based medicines in the treatment of cancer remains to be
convincingly demonstrated. With an acceptable safety profile, cannabis
and its congeners may be useful in managing symptoms related to cancer
or its treatment. Further clinical trials should be conducted to
evaluate whether the preclinical antitumor effects translate into
benefit for cancer patients. Oncologists should familiarize themselves
with the available database to be able to better advise their patients
on the potential uses of this complementary botanical therapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Herrstedt J, Lindberg S, Petersen PC. Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in the Older Patient: Optimizing Outcomes. Drugs Aging 2021; 39:1-21. [PMID: 34882284 PMCID: PMC8654643 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00909-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are still two of the most feared side effects of cancer therapy. Although major progress in the prophylaxis of CINV has been made during the past 40 years, nausea in particular remains a significant problem. Older patients have a lower risk of CINV than younger patients, but are at a higher risk of severe consequences of dehydration and electrolyte disturbances following emesis. Age-related organ deficiencies, comorbidities, polypharmacy, risk of drug–drug interactions, and lack of compliance all need to be addressed in the older patient with cancer at risk of CINV. Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the prophylaxis of CINV, but none of these guidelines offer specific recommendations for older patients with cancer. This means that the recommendations may lead to overtreatment in some older patients. This review describes the development of antiemetic prophylaxis of CINV focusing on older patients, summarizes recommendations from antiemetic guidelines, describes deficiencies in our knowledge of older patients, summarizes necessary precautions, and suggests some future perspectives for antiemetic research in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Næstved, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sanne Lindberg
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Næstved, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Peter Clausager Petersen
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Næstved, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Riera R, Pacheco RL, Bagattini ÂM, Martimbianco ALC. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic use of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogs: Overview of systematic reviews. Phytother Res 2021; 36:5-21. [PMID: 34841610 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The debate on the use of cannabinoids for therapeutic purposes is constantly on the rise. This overview aimed to map the evidence on the therapeutic effects of cannabis derivatives and their synthetic analogs. Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized trials were identified through a comprehensive search in several databases, and their methodological quality were evaluated with AMSTAR-2. The results for main outcomes are presented, prioritizing those from updated and better quality SRs. Finally, 68 SRs, addressing 37 different health conditions, were included. The methodological quality was high for eight SRs. The evidence certainty (GRADE) for the effects of cannabinoids is not high for any of the outcomes identified. Evidence certainty was moderate for the following: (a) cannabidiol appears to be beneficial for quality of life but increases the risk of adverse events in ulcerative colitis; (b) cannabinoids in general appear to have no clinically important benefit for chronic non-oncologic pain, spasticity-related pain in multiple sclerosis, or for acute post-operative pain; (c) cannabinoids in general appear to have a benefit in reducing chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting. For all other outcomes from remaining comparisons, the evidence certainty was low, very low, or not evaluated, which prevents recommendations for or against their routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Riera
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
| | - Rafael Leite Pacheco
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Centro de Pesquisa Médica, Centro Universitário São Camilo (CUSC), São Paulo - SP, Brazil
| | - Ângela Maria Bagattini
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Instituto de Medicina Tropical e Saúde Publica, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia - GO, Brazil
| | - Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.,Mestrado Profissional em Saúde e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (Unimes), Santos - SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Braun IM, Abrams DI, Blansky SE, Pergam SA. Cannabis and the Cancer Patient. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2021; 2021:68-77. [PMID: 34850899 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Session 2 of the National Cancer Institute's Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Cancer Research Workshop opened with testimony from a lymphoma survivor who detailed medicinal cannabis-related improvements in nausea, low appetite, insomnia, and mental health and the limited clinical counsel she received regarding cannabis use. Discussion next turned to the evolution of the legal landscape of cannabis in the United States, one in which state and federal laws frequently conflict and the Controlled Substance Act renders cannabis Schedule I. This legal climate creates conundrums for US medicinal cannabis researchers who contend with limited funding opportunities, avenues to source trial drug, and procedural red tape and for oncology clinicians who recommend medicinal cannabis to patients with some frequency while perceiving themselves as ill equipped to make such clinical recommendations. Ultimately, it creates challenges for cancer patients who find themselves turning to nonmedical and anecdotal information sources. The risks of cannabis use by the cancer patient were discussed next. These include infection, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-botanical interactions, cyclic nausea and vomiting, e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated illness, legal issues, and high cost. The session concluded with a broad survey of the research supporting oncologic cannabinoid use, conclusive evidence for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and suggestive evidence for cancer-related pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana M Braun
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donald I Abrams
- Department of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stacey E Blansky
- School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Steven A Pergam
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis of olanzapine-containing antiemetic therapy for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) patients. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4269-4275. [PMID: 33409724 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05977-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Olanzapine-containing regimens have been reported to be effective in preventing CINV following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), but it is unsure whether it is cost-effective. There has been no cost-effectiveness analysis conducted for olanzapine using costs from the USA. The aim of this study is to determine whether olanzapine-containing antiemetic regimens are cost-effective in patients receiving HEC. METHODS A decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost and health outcomes associated with olanzapine-containing antiemetic regimens and otherwise-identical regimens. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to individually investigate the effect of (i) lower complete response (CR) rates of olanzapine, closer to non-olanzapine-containing regimens; (ii) higher FLIE scores for patients who achieved no/incomplete response, closer to FLIE scores of patients achieving a complete response; (iii) differing costs of olanzapine to reflect different costs per hospitals, globally, due to different insurance systems and drug costs; and (iv) varying costs for uncontrolled CINV, to account for varying durations of chemotherapy and accompanying uncontrolled CINV. RESULTS Olanzapine regimens have an expected cost of $325.24, compared with $551.23 for non-olanzapine regimens. Meanwhile, olanzapine regimens have an expected utility/index of 0.89, relative to 0.87 for non-olanzapine regimens. Olanzapine-containing regimens dominate non-olanzapine-containing regimens even if CR of olanzapine-containing regimens fall to 0.63. Only when CR is between 0.60 and 0.62 is olanzapine both more effective and more costly. CONCLUSION Olanzapine-containing regimens are both cheaper and more effective in the prophylaxis of CINV in HEC patients, compared with non-olanzapine-containing regimens. Future CINV trial resources should be allocated to understand newer antiemetics and compare them to olanzapine-containing regimens as the control arm. Further analysis should use nationally representative data to examine medication costs by payer type.
Collapse
|
24
|
Olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review, meta-analysis, cumulative meta-analysis and fragility assessment of the literature. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:3439-3459. [PMID: 33442782 PMCID: PMC7805431 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05935-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to rigorously review the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in defined hematology oncology settings including (1) the setting of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) settings (2) at 5 mg and 10 mg doses, and (3) for response rates for use in the acute, delayed, and overall settings post-MEC and HEC. METHODS Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through April 23, 2020. The primary efficacy endpoints were the rate of complete response, in the acute (0-24 h post-chemotherapy), delayed (24-120 h post-chemotherapy), and overall (0-120 h post-chemotherapy) phases. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the rates of no nausea and no emesis, for each phase. Safety endpoints were the rate of no serious adverse events (i.e., no grade 3 or 4 toxicities), as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. The Mantel-Haenszel, random-effects analysis model was used to compute risk ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals for each endpoint. For endpoints that statistically favored one arm, absolute risk differences were computed to assess whether there is a 10% or greater difference, used as the threshold for clinical significance by MASCC/ESMO. Fragility indices were also calculated for each statistically significant endpoint, to quantitatively assess the robustness of the summary estimate. A cumulative meta-analysis was conducted for each efficacy meta-analysis with more than 5 studies, also using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects analysis model. RESULTS Three studies reported on olanzapine for the rescue of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); 22 studies reported on olanzapine in the prophylactic setting. For studies reporting on HEC patients, olanzapine-containing regimens were statistically and clinically superior in seven of nine efficacy endpoints in the prophylaxis setting. When olanzapine is administered at a 10-mg dose, it is statistically and clinically superior to control patients in eight of nine endpoints among adults. Olanzapine may be effective in the MEC setting and when administered at 5-mg doses, but the paucity of data leads to notable uncertainty. CONCLUSION Further RCTs are needed in the setting of MEC patients and administration of olanzapine at a lower 5-mg dose, which may be given to reduce the sedative effect of olanzapine at 10 mg.
Collapse
|
25
|
Śledziński P, Nowak-Terpiłowska A, Zeyland J. Cannabinoids in Medicine: Cancer, Immunity, and Microbial Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 22:E263. [PMID: 33383838 PMCID: PMC7795897 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, there has been a growing interest in the medical applications of Cannabis plants. They owe their unique properties to a group of secondary metabolites known as phytocannabinoids, which are specific for this genus. Phytocannabinoids, and cannabinoids generally, can interact with cannabinoid receptors being part of the endocannabinoid system present in animals. Over the years a growing body of scientific evidence has been gathered, suggesting that these compounds have therapeutic potential. In this article, we review the classification of cannabinoids, the molecular mechanisms of their interaction with animal cells as well as their potential application in the treatment of human diseases. Specifically, we focus on the research concerning the anticancer potential of cannabinoids in preclinical studies, their possible use in cancer treatment and palliative medicine, as well as their influence on the immune system. We also discuss their potential as therapeutic agents in infectious, autoimmune, and gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases. We postulate that the currently ongoing and future clinical trials should be accompanied by research focused on the cellular and molecular response to cannabinoids and Cannabis extracts, which will ultimately allow us to fully understand the mechanism, potency, and safety profile of cannabinoids as single agents and as complementary drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Śledziński
- Department of Genome Engineering, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-032 Poznan, Poland;
| | | | - Joanna Zeyland
- Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-632 Poznan, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gressler LE, Baltz AP, Costantino RC, Slejko JF, Onukwugha E. Exploring the Use of State Medical Cannabis Legislation as a Proxy for Medical Cannabis Use Among Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 22:1. [PMID: 33215230 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00803-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The use of medical cannabis is expanding in the USA. Due to conflicting, low-quality evidence, many oncologists may not feel confident to recommend it to patients. Given the potential for legal and financial risks when conducting clinical trials with medical cannabis, the use of observational data should be explored. Observational data that directly capture medical cannabis use in relation to prescription medications and track the prevalence and patterns of cannabis use is sparse. To gain insights into the role medical cannabis plays in the pharmaceutical landscape, proxies such as cannabis legislation need to be explored. In the context of recommendation-nonadherent antiemetic prescribing among patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, medical cannabis may be a suitable alternative to an antiemetic in states that allow medical cannabis. Findings suggest that legislation may impact the use of certain antiemetics in states with cannabis legislation in place. The presence or absence of legislation regarding medical cannabis use may serve as an early, observable surrogate marker of medical cannabis use in the community. In light of the paucity of clinical trials and observational datasets that capture cannabis use, there remains a tremendous need for the development of methodologies or standardized datasets that appropriately and reliably capture the use of medical cannabis to facilitate research into its clinical application and effect on prescription medication use. Standardizing the reporting and destigmatizing use could eliminate the dependence upon proxy measures as a substitute for more extensive data and go a long way in improving data capture, thus allowing us to generate knowledge and hypotheses from observational data until research conditions improve and allow for expanded clinical trials involving medical cannabis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Gressler
- School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| | - Alan P Baltz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Ryan C Costantino
- USA MEDCOM Pharmacy Service Line, Defense Health Agency, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Julia F Slejko
- School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Eberechukwu Onukwugha
- School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grimison P, Mersiades A, Kirby A, Lintzeris N, Morton R, Haber P, Olver I, Walsh A, McGregor I, Cheung Y, Tognela A, Hahn C, Briscoe K, Aghmesheh M, Fox P, Abdi E, Clarke S, Della-Fiorentina S, Shannon J, Gedye C, Begbie S, Simes J, Stockler M. Oral THC:CBD cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II crossover trial. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1553-1560. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|