Administration of docetaxel plus ramucirumab with primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of docetaxel and ramucirumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM) is one of the most effective regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. In our previous study, baseline anemia was identified as a preventive factor against the development of severe adverse effects during the first treatment cycle. It was hypothesized that anemia directly promotes tumor angiogenesis, leading to the elevation of RAM efficacy with increased DOC delivery to tumors, while reducing DOC delivery to other organs, potentially mitigating severe adverse effects. If this hypothesis is correct, patients with baseline anemia may have better clinical outcomes than those with normal hemoglobin levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of DOC + RAM in treating advanced NSCLC in a real-word setting.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC receiving DOC + RAM (n = 72) were retrospectively assessed. They were categorized into a control group with normal baseline hemoglobin levels and an anemia group with baseline anemia. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation.

RESULTS

Patients in the anemia group had a significantly shorter PFS than that of patients in the control group (median PFS: 3.2 and 6.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4.8 and 4.3-9.9 months, respectively;P = 0.008). In addition, the disease control rate in the anemia group was 65.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (93.6%; P = 0.007). Overall survival tended to be shorter in patients with anemia than in controls, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that baseline anemia was a singular risk factor for poor PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13; P = 0.02). The incidence of severe adverse effects did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the PFS of patients with anemia treated with DOC + RAM for advanced NSCLC is shorter than that of those without the symptoms.

Influence of Previous Therapy for Neutropenia Caused by Combination Therapy of Ramucirumab and Docetaxel

In the present study, the influence of previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with ramucirumab (RAM) + docetaxel (DTX) therapy on the occurrence of severe neutropenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated, taking into account the influences of cytotoxic chemotherapy used in pretreatment. The study participants included patients who received a combination therapy of RAM and DTX as cancer chemotherapy for NSCLC. The influences of previous ICI treatment and pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia were analysed. A total of 89 patients, including 50 with and 39 without a history of ICI treatment, were analysed. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference in the influence of previous ICI treatment on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.006). Moreover, Cox regression analysis identified a history of ICI treatment and prophylactic administration of G-CSF as factors associated with the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). This study found that previous treatment with ICIs reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia after RAM + DTX therapy in patients with NSCLC, regardless of the influences of pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents.

Prophylactic pegfilgrastim reduces febrile neutropenia in ramucirumab plus docetaxel after chemoimmunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: post hoc analysis from NEJ051

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Oral Dexamethasone in Combination With Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab Therapy for Previously Treated Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab (DTX + RAM) therapy is a standard treatment for previously treated lung cancer, but many adverse events have been reported. This retrospective study was conducted to examine if the side effects of DTX + RAM therapy can be minimized by the combined use of oral dexamethasone (DEX), and to assess the therapeutic effect of DTX + RAM in patients with recurrent lung cancer.

METHODS

Forty patients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer who underwent DTX + RAM therapy were divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of oral DEX, and the therapeutic effects and toxicities in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly better in the DEX group (P = 0.0203). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.20 months vs 2.87 months (P = 0.064) in the DEX and non-DEX groups, respectively. However, the median overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the DEX group (15.17 months vs 7.37 months, P = 0.0317). The frequency of fluid retention within six months of the start of treatment was 10.0% vs 42.5% in the DEX and non-DEX groups, respectively, with the fluid retention rate being significantly higher in the non-DEX group (P = 0.039).Conclusion: Concomitant use of oral DEX during DTX + RAM therapy may facilitate the long-term continuation of treatment and contribute to OS prolongation.

Detection of factors related to treatment reduction in docetaxel and ramucirumab for non-small cell lung cancer treatment

Treatment using docetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM) is an effective regimen in second or later line advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. However, it induces severe adverse effects, resulting in treatment reduction such as dose reduction and/or discontinuation. This study aimed to reveal the factor(s) associated with treatment reduction in DOC + RAM. We retrospectively evaluated patients with advanced NSCLC (n = 155). Treatment reduction of the second course due to severe adverse effects was conducted in 25.8% of the participants, and relative dose intensity at the second course was 95.7 ± 8.4% for DOC and 91.9 ± 24.8% for RAM. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified that baseline anemia and prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration are preventive factors for the reduction (adjusted odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.66; P = 0.004 for baseline anemia, 0.18; 0.08-0.42; P < 0.0001 for prophylactic G-CSF administration). The primary cause of the reduction was febrile neutropenia, and the same factors were identified. Our study revealed that patients with baseline anemia and prophylactic G-CSF administration have less risk for treatment reduction in DOC + RAM for NSCLC treatment.

Dose reduction of docetaxel avoids the usage of pegfilgrastim in docetaxel plus ramucirumab therapy for recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pegfilgrastim is recommended in docetaxel plus ramucirumab (DTX + RAM) therapy for recurrent nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of the associated frequency of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, the FN occurs less frequently when the dose of DTX is reduced because of other adverse events, such as appetite loss and oral mucositis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with recurrent NSCLC who received DTX + RAM therapy at the Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital. The cut-off value which is the most unlikely to cause FN without the combined use of pegfilgrastim was set using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This was created according to the dose of DTX and the presence or absence of the onset of FN. We compared the incidence of FN when a DTX dose above and below the cut-off value was used. The ROC curve showed that 48 mg/m² was the best cut-off value that predicted whether FN was likely to occur when pegfilgrastim was not used concurrently. The incidence of FN was 26.1% for DTX ≥48 mg/m² and 5.1% for DTX <48 mg/m² .

CONCLUSIONS

Pegfilgrastim can be discontinued when the dose of DTX is reduced to <48 mg/m² due to nonhematological toxicities.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pegfilgrastim in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving ramucirumab plus docetaxel in Japan

PURPOSE

The dose-limiting factor of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM + DTX) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is febrile neutropenia (FN), which has a high incidence in Asians. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim (Peg-G) in patients with NSCLC receiving RAM + DTX in Japan.

METHODS

We simulated model patients treated with RAM + DTX in Japan and developed a decision-analytical model for patients receiving Peg-G prophylaxis or no primary prophylaxis. The expected cost, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of each treatment were calculated from the perspective of a Japanese healthcare payer. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at 45,867 United States dollars (USD) (5 million Japanese yen) per QALY gained. The probabilities, utility values, and other costs were obtained from published sources. Deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic analysis were conducted to evaluate the effect of each parameter and robustness of the base-case results.

RESULTS

The expected cost and QALYs were 20,275 USD and 0.701 for Peg-G prophylaxis and 17,493 USD and 0.672 for no primary prophylaxis, respectively. The ICER was calculated to be 97,519 USD per QALY gained. The results were most sensitive to FN risk with Peg-G. When FN risk with no primary prophylaxis exceeded 51% or the cost of Peg-G was less than 649 USD per injection, the ICER was below the WTP threshold. The probabilistic analysis revealed a 9.1% probability that the ICER was below the WTP threshold.

CONCLUSION

Peg-G is not cost-effective in patients with NSCLC receiving RAM + DTX in Japan.