Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Health care costs among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic transplants: a US payer perspective

ABSTRACT

Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) require extensive care. Using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2016 Q1-2020 Q2), we quantified the costs of care and assessed real-world complication rates among commercially insured US patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and aged between 12 and 64 years undergoing inpatient allo-HCT. Health care resource use and costs were assessed from 100 days before HCT to 100 days after HCT. Primary hospitalization was defined as the time from HCT until first discharge date. Incidence of complications was assessed using medical billing codes from HCT date to 100 days after HCT. Among the 1082 patients analyzed, allo-HCT grafts included peripheral blood (79%), bone marrow (11%), and umbilical cord blood (3%). In the 100 days after HCT, 52% of the patients experienced acute graft-versus-host disease; 21% had cytomegalovirus infection. The median primary hospitalization length of stay (LOS) was 28 days; 31% required readmission in first 100 days after HCT. Across the transplant period (14 days pretransplant to 100 days posttransplant), 44% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit with a median LOS of 29 days. Among those with noncapitated health plans (n = 937), median cost of all-cause health care per patient during the transplant period was $331 827, which was driven by primary hospitalization and readmission. Additionally, the predicted median incremental costs per additional day in an inpatient setting increased with longer LOS (eg, $3381-$4071, 10th-20th day.) Thus, decreasing length of primary hospitalization and avoiding readmissions should significantly reduce the allo-HCT cost of care.

Pediatric transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy health care utilization and implications of eculizumab therapy

ABSTRACT

The health care use (HCU) burden of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) and its treatments are unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate inpatient costs associated with meeting criteria for TA-TMA in the first year after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). This institutional review board-approved retrospective multicenter study included serial children who underwent HCT from 1 January 2015 to 1 July 2019. A standardized unit cost (adjusted for geographic location, differences in cost of living, and inflation) for inpatient hospitalization was extracted from the Pediatric Health Information System data and linked to clinical data. Both total cost and cost per day from 15 days before stem cell infusion to 1-year after HCT were calculated. Among allogeneic (allo) transplant recipients, after adjusting for severe grade 3/4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infections, and HLA mismatch, costs were not different in TA-TMA (n = 137) vs no TA-TMA (n = 238). Severe GVHD was significantly associated with increased costs. Among allo high-risk (HR) TMA-TMA, unadjusted costs were significantly higher in the eculizumab-treated cohort (n = 19) than in the supportive care group (n = 36). However, after adjusting for gastrointestinal bleeding that occurred disproportionately in the eculizumab (n = 6) vs supportive care (n = 0) cohort, eculizumab treatment was not associated with increased total costs. More studies are needed to determine the etiology of increased HCU costs in those with HR-TA-TMA and predict those more likely to benefit from eculizumab, reducing HCU and improving outcomes.

Clinical and Economic Burden Associated With Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Germany

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), yet there are limited data on the clinical and economic burden of aGVHD in Germany. This real-world study aimed to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes among patients in Germany with or without aGVHD after allo-HSCT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims extracted from the German statutory health insurance database. Eligible adult patients underwent allo-HSCT between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2017 for any hematological malignancy. Clinical (severe infections and mortality) and economic (health care resource use [HCRU] and costs) outcomes were compared in "aGVHD" patients and "no GVHD" patients. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance covariates between the aGVHD and no GVHD groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 95 aGVHD and 95 no GVHD patients were included in the analysis. The aGVHD group had significantly higher odds of mortality than the no GVHD group (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.0). Odds of severe infection were similar between the 2 groups (OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.9-3.3). Patients in the aGVHD group had significantly more overnight hospitalizations per patient-year (mean [SD]: 3.7 [3.0] and 2.7 [2.5], P = .029), and total direct costs were 1.6-fold higher than those in the no GVHD group.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who underwent allo-HSCT, aGVHD was associated with significantly higher mortality, HCRU, and costs, highlighting the need for effective prophylaxis and treatment options to prevent or reduce the incidence of aGVHD.

Hospitalization and Healthcare Resource Utilization of Omidubicel-Onlv versus Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies: Secondary Analysis from a Pivotal Phase 3 Clinical Trial

A phase 3 trial (ClincialTrials.gov identifier NCT02730299) of omidubicel-onlv, a nicotinamide-modified allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell therapy manufactured from a single umbilical cord blood (UCB) unit, showed faster hematopoietic recovery, reduced rate of infections, and shorter hospital stay compared with patients randomized to standard UCB. This prospective secondary analysis of the phase 3 trial characterized resource utilization in the first 100 days post-transplantation with omidubicel-onlv compared with UCB. This analysis examined resource utilization, including hospital length of stay, hospital care setting, visits by provider type, rate of transfusions, and readmissions, among the 108 treated patients (omidubicel-onlv, n = 52; UCB, n = 56) from day 0 to day 100 post-transplantation. Demographics were generally balanced between the 2 arms, except a higher proportion of females (52% versus 37%) and older median age (40 years versus 36 years) were noted in the omidubicel-onlv arm. Compared with patients receiving UCB transplantation, patients receiving omidubicel-onlv had a shorter average total hospital length of stay (mean, 41.2 days versus 50.8 days; P = .027) in the first 100 days post-transplantation and more days alive and out of the hospital (mean, 55.8 days versus 43.7 days; P = .023). Fewer patients died in the omidubicel-onlv arm compared with the UCB arm (12% vs 16%) before day 100 post-transplantation. During primary hospitalization (ie, time from transplantation to discharge), fewer patients receiving omidubicel-onlv required intensive care unit (ICU) admission (10% versus 23%) and spent fewer days in the ICU (mean, .4 day versus 4.7 days; P = .028) and transplant unit (mean, 25.3 days versus 32.9 days; P = .022) compared with those receiving UCB. Patients receiving omidubicel-onlv required fewer outpatient consultant and nonconsultant visits and fewer platelet or other transfusions within 100 days from transplantation. Our findings suggest that faster hematopoietic recovery in omidubicel-onlv patients is associated with significantly shorter hospital stay and reduced healthcare resource use compared with UCB.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieves durable remission in approximately 60% of patients. In relapsed or refractory disease, only about 20% achieve durable remission with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ZUMA-7 (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]) and TRANSFORM (lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) trials demonstrated superior event-free survival (and, in ZUMA-7, overall survival) in primary-refractory or early-relapsed (high-risk) DLBCL with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT; however, list prices for CAR-T exceed $400 000 per infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of second-line CAR-T versus salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT.

DESIGN

State-transition microsimulation model.

DATA SOURCES

ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM, other trials, and observational data.

TARGET POPULATION

"High-risk" patients with DLBCL.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Health care sector.

INTERVENTION

Axi-cel or liso-cel versus ASCT.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200 000 per QALY.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

The increase in median overall survival was 4 months for axi-cel and 1 month for liso-cel. For axi-cel, the ICER was $684 225 per QALY and the iNMB was -$107 642. For liso-cel, the ICER was $1 171 909 per QALY and the iNMB was -$102 477.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

To be cost-effective with a WTP of $200 000, the cost of CAR-T would have to be reduced to $321 123 for axi-cel and $313 730 for liso-cel. Implementation in high-risk patients would increase U.S. health care spending by approximately $6.8 billion over a 5-year period.

LIMITATION

Differences in preinfusion bridging therapies precluded cross-trial comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Neither second-line axi-cel nor liso-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $200 000 per QALY. Clinical outcomes improved incrementally, but costs of CAR-T must be lowered substantially to enable cost-effectiveness.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

No research-specific funding.

Estimating the Lifetime Medical Cost Burden of an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patient

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has the potential for curative outcomes for a variety of hematologic malignancies. Current allo-HCT studies often describe the outcomes and costs in the near term; however, research on the lifetime economic burden post-allo-HCT remains limited. This study was conducted to estimate the average total lifetime direct medical costs of an allo-HCT patient and the potential net monetary savings from an alternative treatment associated with improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). A disease-state model was constructed using a short-term decision tree and a long-term semi-Markov partitioned survival model to estimate the average per-patient lifetime cost and expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for an allo-HCT patient from a US healthcare system perspective. Key clinical inputs included overall survival, GRFS, incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD, relapse of the primary disease, and infections. Cost results were reported as ranges based on varying the percentage of chronic GVHD patients that remained on treatment after 2 years (15% or 39%). Over a lifetime, the average per-patient medical cost of allo-HCT was estimated to range from $942,373 to $1,247,917. The majority of the costs were for chronic GVHD treatment (37% to 53%), followed by the allo-HCT procedure (15% to 19%). The expected lifetime QALYs of an allo-HCT patient were estimated as 4.7. Lifetime per-patient treatment costs often exceed $1,000,000 for allo-HCT patients. Innovative research efforts focused on the reduction or elimination of late complications, particularly chronic GVHD, may provide the greatest value to improved patient outcomes.

Clinical and economic burden associated with graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in France

The real-world clinical and economic burden of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has not been comprehensively studied in France. Clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), acute plus chronic GVHD (a+cGVHD) versus no GVHD were compared using French administrative claims data. After propensity score matching, 1934, 408, and 1268 matched pairs were retained for the aGVHD, cGVHD, and a+cGVHD cohorts, respectively. Compared with patients with no GVHD, odds of developing severe infection were greater in patients with aGVHD (odds ratio: 1.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.4, 2.1]). Compared with patients with no GVHD, mortality rates were higher in patients with aGVHD (rate ratio (RR): 1.6 [1.4, 1.7]) and with a+cGVHD (RR: 1.1 [1.0, 1.2]) but similar in patients with cGVHD (RR: 0.9 [0.7, 1.1]). Mean overnight hospital admission rates per patient-year were significantly higher in patients with aGVHD and a+cGVHD compared with no GVHD. Total direct costs (range €174,482-332,557) were 1.2, 1.5, and 1.9 times higher for patients with aGVHD, cGVHD, and a+cGVHD, respectively, versus patients with no GVHD. These results highlight the significant unmet need for effective treatments of patients who experience GVHD.

Incidence, economic burden, and treatment of acute respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients using real world data in Japan: a retrospective claims data analysis

AIMS

Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are common in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, however, data is limited regarding epidemiology and economic burden of ARTI in HSCT recipients in Japan. We evaluated the incidence of ARTI in HSCT recipients, associated economic burden, and ARTI-related treatments post-HSCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients receiving HSCT between July 2017 and December 2018, and those enrolled in the JMDC Claims Database for ≥6 months before index month (month when latest medical procedure code of HSCT recorded) were included. The outcomes included demographics, ARTI incidence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct costs, and ARTI-related treatments.

RESULTS

In 330 analyzed patients, the ARTI incidence rate was 85.5% during total follow-up, consisting of post-HSCT hospitalization of mean 2.1 months and post-discharge periods of mean 17.6 months (post-HSCT hospitalization: 44.8%; post-discharge: 77.6%). For ARTI vs non-ARTI patients during post-HSCT hospitalization, length of hospitalization was significantly longer (mean [SD] months; 2.40 [1.73] vs 1.84 [1.09]; p = 0.0004), and median cost was significantly higher (JPY; 6,250,120.00 vs 4,774,570.00; p = 0.0096). The cost of outpatient visits during post-discharge periods, drug-related and non-drug-related costs of outpatient visits were generally higher for ARTI vs non-ARTI patients. In ARTI vs non-ARTI patients, utilization of any symptom relievers (decongestants, antitussives, and antipyretics), bronchodilators, immunoglobulin G, antibiotics, antivirals, and oxygen supply were numerically higher during post-HSCT hospitalization and post-discharge periods. The proportion of patients and mean prescription days for immunosuppressants during post-HSCT hospitalization were higher in ARTI vs non-ARTI patients.

LIMITATIONS

This administrative claims study lacks clinical data and contains only direct medical costs. Patients were retained if they had at least 1 month of enrollment post-HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

In HSCT recipients, ARTI leads to substantial incremental HCRU and direct costs for management in real-world settings in Japan.

Improved Therapeutic Approaches are Needed to Manage Graft-versus-Host Disease

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) offers a potentially curative therapy for patients suffering from diseases of the haematopoietic system but requires a high level of expertise and is both resource intensive and expensive. A frequent and life-threatening complication is graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Acute GvHD (aGvHD) generally causes skin, gastrointestinal and liver symptoms, but chronic GvHD (cGvHD) has a different pathophysiology and may affect nearly every organ or tissue of the body. In Europe, GvHD prophylaxis is generally a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with methotrexate, with high-dose systemic steroids used for advanced GvHD treatment. Between 39% and 59% of alloHSCT patients will develop aGvHD and around 36–37% will develop cGvHD. Steroid response decreases with increasing disease severity, which in turn leads to an increase in non-relapse mortality. GvHD imposes a financial burden on healthcare systems, significantly increasing post-alloHSCT costs. Increased GvHD disease severity magnifies this. Balancing immunosuppression to control the GvHD whilst maintaining a degree of immunocompetence against infection is critical. European GvHD guidelines acknowledge the lack of evidence to support a standard second-line therapy, and improved long-term outcomes and quality-of-life (QoL) remain an unmet need. Evidence generation for potential treatments is challenging. Issues to overcome include choice of comparator (extensive off-label usage); blinding; selection of relevant patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); and rarity of the condition, which may infeasibly increase timescales to achieve clinical and statistical relevance.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with steroid-resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease in the United States: a retrospective claims database analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the most serious non-relapse complication affecting long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors. We describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with steroid-resistant (SR) cGVHD versus no GVHD up to 360 and 720 days post-HCT.

METHODS

Claims from the Optum Research Database were used to identify patients aged ≥12 years who underwent allogeneic HCT (index date) in the United States from 01 January 2010 to 31 August 2016 with diagnosis of cGVHD (within the study period or unspecified GVHD beyond 120 days post-HCT [SR defined as additional therapy ≥7 days after initiation of systemic steroids]) or no GVHD at any time. All-cause HCRU and costs were compared in patients with SR cGVHD (1-year analysis, n = 296; 2-year analysis, n = 178) versus no GVHD (1-year analysis, n = 227; 2-year analysis, n = 158).

RESULTS

Most patients with SR cGVHD (75%) received ≥4 lines of therapy during follow-up. Patients with SR cGVHD had significantly more median office visits (49 vs. 27), outpatient visits (69 vs. 24), emergency department visits (1 vs. 0), and inpatient admissions (2 vs. 1) within 1 year post-HCT versus patients with no GVHD (all p<.001); HCRU was also higher in the 2-year period. Median total all-cause costs were significantly higher (p<.001) for patients with SR cGVHD versus no GVHD in the 1-year ($372,254 vs. $219,593) and 2-year ($532,673 vs. $252,909) follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SR cGVHD required multiple lines of therapy and used significantly more outpatient and inpatient resources resulting in higher costs versus patients with no GVHD.