Acute chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy due to oxaliplatin administration without cold stimulation

Development and validation of the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy integrated assessment - oxaliplatin subscale: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment tools mostly have poor sensitivity and weak anti-interference, so that it is sometimes difficult to provide substantive guidance for clinical intervention. This study aimed to develop an assessment tool dedicated for oxaliplatin to address these limitations.

METHODS

This study screened 445 OIPN-related literatures for producing a symptom list, and developed the questionnaire module through expert supplement, item generation, content correlation analysis, pre-testing, and item improvement. The validation phase used a Chinese population-based prospective cohort study from June 2021 to July 2022. Patients were requested to complete the tested questionnaire, QLQ-CIPN20 and the CTCAE grading one day before cycles 2-6 of chemotherapy. Cronbach's α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for the internal consistency and stability analysis, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the construct validity. The correlations among the tested questionnaire, QLQ-CIPN20 and CTCAE were compared for the criterion validity analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was utilized to compare the sensitivity between the tested questionnaire and QLQ-CIPN20.

RESULT

A 20-item CIPN assessment tool named chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy integrated assessment - oxaliplatin subscale (CIPNIA-OS) was developed. The validation phase included 186 patients. Cronbach's α coefficient of CIPNIA-OS was 0.764 (> 0.7), and ICC was 0.997 (between 0.9 and 1). The structure of CIPNIA-OS containing seven factors was examined. The correlation coefficient between CIPNIA-OS and CTCAE was 0.661 (95%CI 0.623 to 0.695), which was significantly higher than that between QLQ-CIPN20 and CTCAE (0.417, 95%CI 0.363 to 0.469, p < 0.01). Besides, the total score of CIPNIA-OS was mostly higher than QLQ-CIPN20, with an average difference of 2.189 (CI 95% 2.056 to 2.322), and the difference gradually expanded with the progress of chemotherapy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study developed an original CIPN questionnaire which was dedicated for OIPN assessment. It was a comprehensive tool that covered acute OIPN symptoms and integrated features from several proven CIPN assessment tools. The validation results supported that CIPNIA-OS had satisfactory reliability, stability, construct, criterion validity, and was more accuracy and sensitive than QLQ-CIPN20 in the evaluation of OIPN.

Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients: a single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is a major first-line conventional therapy for advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, oxaliplatin causes chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Acupuncture has long been used to alleviate limb numbness in Chinese medicine practice.

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for the alleviation of CIPN in CRC patients.

DESIGN

This was a pilot single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty eligible patients, who had been diagnosed with CRC and were undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to the EA intervention group or sham acupuncture (SA) control group. During a 12-week treatment period, patients in the EA group received EA once a week, while patients in the SA group received SA; both groups were followed up for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Compared with the SA group, the EA group exhibited significant alleviation of CIPN severity during chemotherapy. Moreover, EA also improved the physical function, role function, and social function of CRC patients. However, there were no significant differences in tests of vibration or light touch sensation. In addition, EA appeared to be a safe treatment for CIPN and was both feasible and acceptable to CRC patients during chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study showed preliminary evidence for the efficacy and safety of EA in acute CIPN among CRC patients, although further studies are needed to verify these effects and to further explore the potential role of EA in chronic CIPN (effects on which remain unclear).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03582423 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Incidence and risk factors associated with development of oxalipatin-induced acute peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Oxaliplatin utilized in colorectal neoplasms treatment could induce acute peripheral neuropathy (APN) which is a dreadful and frequent adverse event. The objective of this study is to estimate incidence of APN induced by oxaliplatin cumulative incidence in cancer patients colorectal and to describe the distribution of the APN incidence according to demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as according to oxaliplatin cumulative dose.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective descriptive study which took place from June to December 2018 at the Salah Azaiz Institute, Tunis. Demographic data, clinical data and data on oxaliplatin administration were collected from patient interview, medical files and pharmaceutical databases.

RESULTS

The APN (grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3) cumulative incidence during the period of six months of follow up was 86% (95% CI [0.7815-0.9132]). While 38.3% (95% CI [0.29-0.48]) of the patients had grade 2 or 3 neuropathy. The search for factors associated with the risk of grade 2 and 3 NAP revealed trend significant association with diabetes (adjusted RR = 5.7 (IC95% [0.9- 37.3]; p = 0.07). Moreover, there was significant association with oxaliplatin cumulative dose (≥421 mg/m2) to increase the risk of APN grade 2 and 3 (adjusted RR = 7.8; [2.7-22.7]; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, significant association with obesity to increase the risk of APN grade 2 and 3 (adjusted RR = 5.3 [1.1- 25.4]; p = 0.04) was found. Among the patients included, 31.1% experienced oxaliplatin dose reduction and in the majority of cases this reduction is due to neurotoxicity (90.9%).

CONCLUSION

The high incidence of oxaliplatin-induced APN remains an embarrassing and handicapping side effect. Our study has shown that oxaliplatin cumulative dose (≥421 mg/m2), diabetes and obesity are risk factor for the development of grade 2 and 3 APN.

Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Experiencing pain and insufficient relief can be devastating and negatively affect a patient's quality of life. Developments in oncology such as new treatments and adjusted pain management guidelines may have influenced the prevalence of cancer pain and severity in patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients in the 2014-2021 literature period. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were evaluated and assessed on methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed on the pooled prevalence and severity rates. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore differences between treatment groups. We identified 10,637 studies, of which 444 studies were included. The overall prevalence of pain was 44.5%. Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 30.6% of the patients, a lower proportion compared to previous research. Pain experienced by cancer survivors was significantly lower compared to most treatment groups. Our results imply that both the prevalence of pain and pain severity declined in the past decade. Increased attention to the assessment and management of pain might have fostered the decline in the prevalence and severity of pain.

New diagnostic measures of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is an unwanted side effect of oxaliplatin chemotherapy treatment. OIPN manifests in an acute phase that lasts a few days after injection and a persistent phase that may become chronic. Currently, there is no consensus about a clinically applicable, quantitative, and objective measure of OIPN.

METHODS

Seventeen patients treated with oxaliplatin containing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, but otherwise healthy, were tested with six quantitative sensory tests (QST) and five large fibre perception threshold tracking (PTT) measures (quantified by, e.g., rheobase and electrotonus threshold) one hour before each of the 12 chemotherapy cycles given at two weeks' intervals. These measures were repeated at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. The temporal development of OIPN assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale, QST, and PTT measures was calculated by linear regression.

RESULTS

The CTCAE score showed a tri-phasic increase during the treatment and remained increased during the follow-up. The vibration threshold (R = 0.25, p<0.001), the cold pain threshold (R = 0.17, p = 0.02), and the rheobase (R = 0.28, p < 0.001) increased during treatment, whereas the cold detection threshold (R=-0.16, p = 0.002) decreased. The cold pain threshold and the rheobase remained increased, and the cold detection and heat pain threshold remained decreased during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased cold pain sensitivity and decreased large fibre sensitivity (increased rheobase) correlate to the persistent OIPN, whereas the CTCAE score assesses both acute and persistent OIPN. Furthermore, the novel PTT method assessed the nerve excitability changes caused by the oxaliplatin.

Predictive Biomarkers of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is a platinum compound primarily used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. OXA-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN) is the major non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity of OXA-based chemotherapy and includes acute transient neurotoxic effects that appear soon after OXA infusion, and chronic non-length dependent sensory neuronopathy symmetrically affecting both upper and lower limbs in a stocking-and-glove distribution. No effective strategy has been established to reverse or treat OXAIPN. Thus, it is necessary to early predict the occurrence of OXAIPN during treatment and possibly modify the OXA-based regimen in patients at high risk as an early diagnosis and intervention may slow down neuropathy progression. However, identifying which patients are more likely to develop OXAIPN is clinically challenging. Several objective and measurable early biomarkers for OXAIPN prediction have been described in recent years, becoming useful for informing clinical decisions about treatment. The purpose of this review is to critically review data on currently available or promising predictors of OXAIPN. Neurological monitoring, according to predictive factors for increased risk of OXAIPN, would allow clinicians to personalize treatment, by monitoring at-risk patients more closely and guide clinicians towards better counseling of patients about neurotoxicity effects of OXA.