1
|
Yoo MG, Collier A, Minor T, Lipsey K, Harris KM. Asthma and Participation: A Scoping Review. OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH 2024:15394492241274754. [PMID: 39189088 DOI: 10.1177/15394492241274754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
Asthma is a widespread pediatric chronic disease, but there is limited understanding of its impact on participation (other than physical activity) and the conceptualization of participation. We conducted a scoping review to explore the evidence on the relationship between pediatric asthma and participation in several domains of occupation outlined in the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework 4th Edition. A structured literature search was implemented in PubMed/MEDLINE, Elsevier EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection, and APA PsycINFO. Data were extracted by occupational domain and analyzed using a stoplight categorization. Of the 3444 identified articles, 10 met inclusion criteria, five of which were categorized as green (addressing specific occupational activities). No article explicitly defined participation. Asthma's influence on nonphysical activity occupations remains unclear. Future research must clarify both the meaning and measures that best capture participation, and further explore the relationship between asthma and participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelyn Grace Yoo
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Kim Lipsey
- Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kelly M Harris
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stout NL, Harrington SE, Perry A, Alappattu MJ, Pfab V, Stewart B, Manes MR. Implementation of a Cancer Rehabilitation Navigation Program: a qualitative analysis of implementation determinants and strategies. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1325-1338. [PMID: 37099228 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01374-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer rehabilitation navigation (CRNav) is a care delivery model that expedites identification and management of symptom-related functional morbidity for individuals undergoing cancer treatment. A CRNav program is unique in that it embeds a cancer rehabilitation professional in the cancer center for patient screening and assessment. The implementation of CRNav programs has not been studied and doing so could facilitate greater uptake of these programs. METHODS Using implementation science frameworks, we conducted a qualitative, post-implementation analysis of a CRNav program that was implemented in 2019. Semi-structured, 1:1 interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a combination of deductive and inductive analyses, using a priori established codes, was used to assess the implementation context, and identify emergent themes of barriers and facilitators to implementation. Participant described implementation strategies were characterized and defined using the Expert Consensus Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy. RESULTS Eleven stakeholders including physicians, administrators, clinical staff, and patients, involved with program development and the implementation effort, participated in interviews. Predominant barriers to implementation included developing the program infrastructure, and lack of awareness of rehabilitation services among oncology professionals, predominant facilitators of implementation included; physical co-location of the navigator in the cancer center, individual characteristics of the navigator, and unique characteristics of the program. Strategies described that supported implementation included developing stakeholder interrelationships, evaluating and iteratively adapting the program, creating infrastructure, training and education, and supporting clinicians. CONCLUSION This analysis uses implementation science to methodically analyze and characterize factors that may contribute to successful implementation of a CRNav program. These findings could be used alongside a prospective context-specific analysis to tailor future implementation efforts. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Implementing a CRNav program expedites a patient's direct contact with a rehabilitation provider complementing the cancer care delivery team, and providing an additive and often missing service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Stout
- School of Medicine, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
| | - Shana E Harrington
- Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, Physical Therapy Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Ashley Perry
- Halifax Health | Brooks Rehabilitation, Daytona, FL, USA
| | - Meryl J Alappattu
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Victoria Pfab
- School of Medicine, Human Performance, School of Physical Therapy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Benjamin Stewart
- School of Medicine, Human Performance, School of Physical Therapy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
L’Hotta AJ, Varughese TE, Lyons KD, Trebelhorn A, Manohar A, King AA. Preferences for Participation Measurement Among Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer: A Qualitative Content Analysis. OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH 2024; 44:244-254. [PMID: 37354019 PMCID: PMC10748790 DOI: 10.1177/15394492231181104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with cancer experience occupational participation restrictions, but there is no consensus on how to measure this construct. The objective of this study is to describe the perspectives and preferences of individuals with cancer regarding participation measurement. Forty individuals with brain, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer provided feedback on three participation measures in semi-structured interviews. Through an iterative, team-based content analysis approach, interview text was coded using the study codebook and organized into themes. Core themes included (a) participation measures highlighted occupational priorities, (b) measuring participation can identify supportive care needs, (c) measures must balance thoroughness with speed of completion, (d) measurement timeframe varies by treatment phase, and (e) evaluating community engagement is not a priority for some individuals with cancer. Integrating participation measures into cancer care can support referrals to occupational therapy and supportive services. It is essential to consider time since cancer diagnosis and client priorities when selecting participation measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Allison A. King
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- St. Louis Children’s Hospital, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li G, Qin R, Zhao X, Zhao D, Li P. Limitations on participation and global quality of life among CRC survivors with permanent stomas: moderated mediation analysis of psychological distress and family functioning. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:526. [PMID: 37594615 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07993-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although a cancer diagnosis and stoma creation leave colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors with significant limitations on participation in life activities that would impair their global quality of life (QoL), the underlying psychological mechanisms are understudied. The aim of this cross-section study was to examine whether psychological distress mediates the association of limitations on participation in life activity with global QoL, and whether family functioning moderated the indirect effects of limitations on participation in life activities on global QoL through psychological distress. METHODS CRC survivors with permanent stomas (n = 282) completed questionnaires assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, limitations on participation in life activities, psychological distress, family functioning, and global QoL. The mediation model and moderated mediation model were conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS. RESULTS Mediation analysis showed that the association of limitations on participation in life activities with global QoL was partially mediated by psychological distress (indirect effect = -0.087, 95% CI = -0.135 to -0.041). Moderated mediation analysis indicated that the indirect effects of limitations on participation in life activities on global QoL through psychological distress were significantly moderated by family functioning. Specifically, the indirect effects decreased were significant as family functioning levels increased. CONCLUSION CRC survivors with permanent stomas experienced poor global QoL. The moderated mediation model provides a better understanding of how limitations on participation in life activities, psychological distress, and family functioning work together to affect global QoL. Interventions aiming to improve QoL among CRC survivors with permanent stomas should consider targeting these aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guopeng Li
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Qin
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangyu Zhao
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China
| | - Di Zhao
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhua West Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
L'Hotta AJ, Yan Y, Davis AA, Waqar SN, Chheda MG, Tan BR, Lyons KD, Park Y, King AA. Trajectories of participation in daily life among individuals newly diagnosed with cancer: A 5-month longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:213. [PMID: 36917417 PMCID: PMC10011771 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07672-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine how participation in daily life is impacted during the first six months following a new cancer diagnosis and to identify risk factors for participation restrictions. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were used to suggest referrals to rehabilitation services. METHODS Participants (n = 123) were adults (> 18 years) with the newly diagnosed primary brain, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. PROs were collected at baseline (within 30 days of diagnosis/treatment initiation), two and five months post baseline. Daily life participation was assessed through the community participation indicators (CPI) (score range: 0-1) and patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) ability to participate, (score range: 20-80; mean: 50, SD: 10). PROMIS-43 profile was also completed. Linear mixed-effect models with random intercept evaluated change in participation over time. RESULTS The baseline total sample mean CPI score was 0.56; patients reported mildly impaired participation based on PROMIS scores (baseline: 46.19, 2-month follow-up: 44.81, 5 months: 44.84). However, no statistically significant changes in participation were observed over the study period. Risk factors for lower participation included receiving chemotherapy, lower physical function, higher anxiety and fatigue, and reduction in employment, p < 0.05. PROs indicated that roughly half of the participants may benefit from physical or occupational therapy or mental health support, but only 20-36% were referred by their medical team. CONCLUSION People newly diagnosed with cancer experience impaired participation, but they are infrequently referred to supportive services such as rehabilitation. The use of PROs to assess participation, physical function, and mental health can promote access to supportive care services by identifying patients who may benefit from rehabilitation beyond those identified through routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J L'Hotta
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Yan Yan
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Andrew A Davis
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Saiama N Waqar
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Milan G Chheda
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Benjamin R Tan
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Kathleen D Lyons
- Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yikyung Park
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8505-45-01, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Allison A King
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine & St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Desai RH, Hamlin E, Eyler A, Putnam M, Stark S, Doering M, Morgan K. The Role of the Built Environment in the Community Participation of Adults Aging With Long-Term Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF AGING AND ENVIRONMENT 2023; 38:232-256. [PMID: 39190651 PMCID: PMC10961975 DOI: 10.1080/26892618.2023.2175099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this scoping review was to characterize the nature and scope of existing literature on the role of built environments in the community participation of adults aging with physical disabilities (AAwPD). A scoping review was selected to identify the volume and types of evidence available, pinpoint knowledge gaps, and clarify key concepts. Twenty-one articles were included for review, all of which were published within the last 20 years and identified components of the built environment for intervention. Results demonstrated the need for investigators to identify common indicators, use a shared lexicon, and improve dissemination of results across disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Heeb Desai
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Emily Hamlin
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amy Eyler
- Brown School of Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Susan Stark
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Kerri Morgan
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
L'Hotta AJ, Shivakumar N, Lyons KD, Trebelhorn A, Manohar A, King AA. Perspectives of Participation in Daily Life From Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Analysis. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100212. [PMID: 36123981 PMCID: PMC9482024 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To characterize how survivors of cancer define participation. Design Cross-sectional qualitative study. Setting Participants were enrolled from a large academic medical center in the Midwestern United States. Interviews were conducted over Zoom or phone. Participants Survivors of cancer (N=40) with brain, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer (n=10 per group). Participants were purposively sampled to maximize variation in the study sample. Participant ages ranged from 26-83 years, with a mean age of 55 years. Seventy percent of participants were receiving active cancer treatment at the time of the interview. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Participant perspectives gathered from 1-on-1 semistructured interviews. Qualitative description and thematic analysis were used to analyze interview transcripts and develop themes from the data. Results Survivors described participation as doing valued activities and highlighted 4 common aspects: (1) control; (2) social connection; (3) engaging in various contexts; and (4) cultivation of joy and purpose. Fully participating in life involved being able to do what they want to do without restrictions or limitations. Survivors’ perspectives of control outlined how competence, choice, adaptations, and locus of control influence broader feelings of control and participation. Interviews highlighted that participation remains central to daily life among survivors of cancer. Conclusions Rehabilitation researchers and clinicians need to establish a standard and comprehensive definition of participation. Rehabilitation providers need to consistently evaluate how participation is affected among survivors of cancer and use measures that include core aspects of participation identified in this study and previous research. Comprehensively defining participation will improve the design and selection of measurement tools and support comprehensive assessment of survivor experiences.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sleight A, Gerber LH, Marshall TF, Livinski A, Alfano CM, Harrington S, Flores AM, Virani A, Hu X, Mitchell SA, Varedi M, Eden M, Hayek S, Reigle B, Kerkman A, Neves R, Jablonoski K, Hacker ED, Sun V, Newman R, McDonnell KK, L'Hotta A, Schoenhals A, Dpt NLS. Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes in Cancer Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 103:1807-1826. [PMID: 35104445 PMCID: PMC9339032 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions targeting optimal physical or cognitive function in adults with a history of cancer and describe the breadth of evidence as well as strengths and limitations across a range of functional domains. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Plus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The time scope was January 2008 to April 2019. STUDY SELECTION Prospective, controlled trials including single- and multiarm cohorts investigating rehabilitative interventions for cancer survivors at any point in the continuum of care were included, if studies included a primary functional outcome measure. Secondary data analyses and pilot/feasibility studies were excluded. Full-text review identified 362 studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION Extraction was performed by coauthor teams and quality and bias assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence Scheme (class I-IV). DATA SYNTHESIS Studies for which the functional primary endpoint achieved significance were categorized into 9 functional areas foundational to cancer rehabilitation: (1) quality of life (109 studies), (2) activities of daily living (61 studies), (3) fatigue (59 studies), (4) functional mobility (55 studies), (5) exercise behavior (37 studies), (6) cognition (20 studies), (7) communication (10 studies), (8) sexual function (6 studies), and (9) return to work (5 studies). Most studies were categorized as class III in quality/bias. Averaging results found within each of the functional domains, 71% of studies reported statistically significant results after cancer rehabilitation intervention(s) for at least 1 functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide evidence supporting the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions for individuals with a cancer history. The findings should be balanced with the understanding that many studies had moderate risk of bias and/or limitations in study quality by AAN criteria. These results may provide a foundation for future work to establish clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitative interventions across cancer disease types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Sleight
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States; Center for Integrated Research in Cancer and Lifestyle (CIRCL), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States; Cedars Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California, United States; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
| | - Lynn H Gerber
- College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax County, Virginia, United States; Inova Health System, Inova Medicine Services, Falls Church, Virginia, United States
| | | | - Alicia Livinski
- National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Catherine M Alfano
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, United States; Center for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, United States; Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, United States
| | - Shana Harrington
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Survivorship Institute, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Aneesha Virani
- Rehabilitation Department, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Xiaorong Hu
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Rehabilitation Medicine School, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Mitra Varedi
- Epidemiology and Cancer Control Department, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Melissa Eden
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
| | - Samah Hayek
- Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Beverly Reigle
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Anya Kerkman
- Lincoln Cancer Rehabilitation, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States; CHI Health St Elizabeth, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
| | - Raquel Neves
- Czech Rehabilitation Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kathleen Jablonoski
- Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Eileen Danaher Hacker
- Department of Science of Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States; Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States
| | - Robin Newman
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Karen Kane McDonnell
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Allison L'Hotta
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Alana Schoenhals
- Mrs T.H. Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Nicole L Stout Dpt
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States; Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knightbridge L, Bourke-Taylor HM, Hill KD. Healthy ageing through participation in community situated activities: A scoping review of assessment instruments to support occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2022; 69:493-509. [PMID: 35445413 PMCID: PMC9546241 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The occupational therapy profession has an essential role to play in healthy ageing that includes enabling participation, a construct that according to The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), incorporates an environmental context. Environmental barriers and enablers of participation in community‐situated activities for people over the age of 65 have been identified. To support practice, occupational therapists require assessments with demonstrated content validity including comprehensive coverage of the construct. The purpose of this scoping review study was to investigate what instruments are available to assess community participation for people over the age of 65 that included environmental factors. Methods A scoping review of the literature was conducted, utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology. The evidence source was review articles and inclusion criteria were that they reviewed instruments to assess participation that could be used for people over the age of 65. Items extracted from included instruments were evaluated against a preset list of community‐participation and environment categories that had been developed from the ICF. Results Twenty‐three review studies met inclusion criteria and from these 240 instruments were extracted. Twenty instruments were retained after exclusions and from these, 540 instrument items were extracted. Of these, 280 (47%) were coded as community‐participation, and only 20 (3.4%) as environment items. Fourteen of the instruments included no environment items. Conclusions No instrument was identified that comprehensively assessed community participation including the related environmental factors. Such an instrument is required to enable occupational therapy practitioners to support healthy ageing. The development of such an instrument will strengthen the profession's capacity to develop new ways of delivering services to older adults in line with emerging ways that aged care will be delivered and to advance its essential role in healthy ageing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Knightbridge
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University-Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen M Bourke-Taylor
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University-Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Keith D Hill
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Rehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Faculty Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University (Peninsula Campus), Frankston, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brick R, Turner R, Bender C, Douglas M, Eilers R, Ferguson R, Leland N, Lyons KD, Toto P, Skidmore E. Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on activity limitations and participation restrictions in older breast cancer survivors: A scoping review. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 13:132-142. [PMID: 34598902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Cancer-related disability is a complex problem for older breast cancer survivors. One aspect of cancer-related disability is a survivor's inability to complete meaningful daily activities and engage in life roles, referred to as activity limitations and participation restrictions respectively. There is a limited understanding of how interventions influence activity limitations and participation restrictions in this population. A scoping review was undertaken to identify and characterize nonpharmacological interventions developed to address activity limitations and participation restrictions. A systematic search of electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, and Ovid PsycINFO) was conducted in April 2020 and updated October 2020. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Most frequently observed delivery features were in-person and one-on-one format. Six interventions incorporated telehealth delivery components. Interventions were often complex and varied in content. Exercise and behavioral strategies were among the most frequently used active ingredients. Activity limitations and participation restrictions were often secondary outcomes, and measures of these outcomes were varied in content and assessment method. Study samples were not representative of the current population of older adult breast cancer survivors. Future intervention research should clarify intervention delivery, content, and dose, prioritize comprehensive measurement of activity limitations and participation restrictions, as well as recruit and involve representative study samples to enhance generalizability of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Brick
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| | - Rose Turner
- University of Pittsburgh, Health Sciences Library System, Falk Library, 200 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States of America.
| | - Catherine Bender
- University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, 415 Victoria Building, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States of America.
| | - Madilyn Douglas
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| | - Rachel Eilers
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| | - Robert Ferguson
- Center for Counseling and Cancer Support, 5220 Centre Avenue, Shadyside Medical Bldg, Suite 604, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, United States of America.
| | - Natalie Leland
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| | - Kathleen D Lyons
- 7750 Psychiatry Dept, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756, United States of America.
| | - Pamela Toto
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| | - Elizabeth Skidmore
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Occupational Therapy, Bridgeside Point I, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|