Informal caregiver well-being during and after patients' treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a prospective, exploratory study

Resilience and related factors in caregivers of adult cancer patients: a systematic review

Background

This systematic review aimed to investigate resilience and its related factors in caregivers of adult patients with cancer.

Materials and methods

A systematic search of online electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) was performed using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Psychological Resilience", "Caregiver", and "Cancer" from the earliest to 6 June 2023. The quality of the studies included in this review was evaluated using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool).

Results

A total of 2735 caregivers of cancer patients participated in 15 studies. The majority of the studies found that caregivers of cancer patients had high levels of resilience. Factors related to the resilience of cancer patients' caregivers included caregivers' social support, caregivers' quality of life, patients' resilience, caregivers' family function, patients' performance, caregivers' age, caregivers' health status, caregivers' self-esteem, caregivers post-traumatic growth, caregivers religious, caregivers hope, caregivers positive affect, patients age, patients social support, patients resilience support, patients quality of life, caregivers' anxiety, caregivers' depression, caregivers' burden, caregivers level of education, caregivers financial problem, caregivers memory, caregivers negative affect, caregivers post-traumatic stress disorder, maternal distress, and patients post-traumatic stress disorder.

Conclusion

Therefore, healthcare administrators and policymakers can enhance the resilience of caregivers and the quality of care they provide by instituting ongoing training initiatives focused on evaluating mental well-being and implementing coping strategies for managing stress and depression.

Association between emotional competence and risk of unmet supportive care needs in caregivers of cancer patients at the beginning of care

PURPOSE

This cross-sectional study explored the associations between intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional competence (EC) and the unmet supportive care needs (SCN), anxiety, and depression of informal caregivers at the beginning of gastrointestinal or haematological cancer care, i.e. during chemotherapy and within 6 months after diagnosis.

METHODS

The participants completed a self-reported questionnaire, comprising the Short Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC), the SCN survey for partners and caregivers (SCNS-P&C), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to explore the influence of EC on unmet SCN and the presence of moderate/severe anxiety or depression.

RESULTS

Most of the 203 caregivers were women (n = 141, 69.80%) and the partners of patients (n = 148, 73.27%) suffering from gastrointestinal (n = 112, 55.17%) and haematological (n = 91, 44.83%) cancer. Only intrapersonal EC showed a significant influence out of all the dimensions of unmet SCN related to healthcare services and information (odds ratio (OR) = 0.35 [95%CI 0.19; 0.65]), emotional and psychological needs (OR = 0.43 [95%CI 0.25; 0.74]), work and social security (OR = 0.57 [95%CI 0.37; 0.88]), and communication and family support (OR = 0.61 [95%CI 0.39; 0.95]). A one-unit increase in the intrapersonal EC score significantly reduced the probability of anxiety (OR = 0.42, [95%CI 0.26; 0.68]) and depression (OR = 0.34, [95%CI 0.21; 0.55]).

CONCLUSION

Intrapersonal EC of caregivers is crucial to reduce the risk of unmet SCN, anxiety, and depression from the beginning of care. Identifying caregivers with lower intrapersonal EC may be necessary to increase vigilance from healthcare professionals and psychologists.

Spouses of patients treated for colon cancer: identification of key caregiver skills using the Delphi method

PURPOSE

Spouses are often the front-line caregivers for colon cancer patients. Providing this support requires a particular set of coping skills. Our objective was to identify key skills that healthcare and medico-social sector professionals could assess in routine practice that would allow them to propose appropriate support to spouses who are accompanying colon cancer patients in their care pathway.

METHODS

An online two-round Delphi study was conducted among French colon cancer patients, spouses and professionals. The content of the Delphi study was developed from a previously published qualitative study.

RESULTS

In the first round of the study, 63% of the participants were professionals (n = 40), 19% spouses (n = 12) and 17% patients (n = 11). In the second round, they were respectively 55% (n = 22), 22% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 9). Twenty-seven of the 75 proposed skills were consensually identified as key skills. Nine were related to emotional and psychological well-being, six to social relations, four to organisation, five to health and three to domestic domains. The three most consensual skills (≥ 90% agreement) for spouses were (1) helping the tired patient in everyday life, (2) stimulating the patient to prevent him/her from giving up and (3) limiting one's amount of personal time to care for the patient.

CONCLUSION

The study identified the key skills needed by spouses of patients being treated for colon cancer. Better awareness of these skills among professionals would enable them to offer tailored support to help patients and spouses maintain their physical and emotional well-being.

Dyadic Effects of Psychological Health on Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review dyadic research on psychological health and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and caregivers and examine the pooled partner effects and actor effects based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. We registered our review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42021258482). Six databases were searched until June 2021 using the following keywords: colorectal neoplasms, caregivers, depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life. Two reviewers independently screened 1,597 studies that included both CRC patients and family caregivers. Meta-analyses were performed of the partner and actor effects of psychological health on HRQL in CRC.

CONCLUSION

Eighteen observational studies involving 2,757 patients with CRC and 2,601 caregivers were included. Regarding partner effects, the distress of patients with CRC affected their family caregivers' distress and burden. There were three types of actor effects among patients with CRC and family caregivers: 1) the social support of patients with CRC affects their level of distress; (2) the distress of patients with CRC affects their HRQL; and (3) caregivers' social support affects their level of distress. This study provides the first comprehensive overview of the dyadic relationships between psychological health and HRQL in patients with CRC and their caregivers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The development of dyadic interventions for improving psychological health is warranted to help both patients with CRC and their family caregivers live with improved HRQL and well-being.

Taking Care of an Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivor: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer on Family Caregivers

Research usually investigates adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer in combination with younger and older cancer patients and survivors. However, AYAs with cancer are a unique group, and their caregivers' experience may also differ from other caregivers of cancer survivors. This systematic review aims to understand the impact of a cancer diagnosis on family caregivers, comparing the experience of caregivers of AYA childhood cancer survivors (AYA CCS) and caregivers of AYA with cancer. Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and their quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklists. Sixteen studies (17 reports) met the inclusion criteria. Findings were synthesized separately for caregivers of AYA CCS and caregivers of AYA with cancer. Results showed that caregivers in both groups experienced high distress after the diagnosis. Partners of AYAs with cancer experienced diminished quality of life (QoL) and over half reported moderate to high fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Findings indicated that cancer negatively impacts family caregivers, regardless of the patient's age at diagnosis. However, findings are heterogeneous, and most do not focus on QoL or FCR. More research is needed on the impact of cancer among these family caregivers.

Financial toxicity following surgical treatment for colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Financial toxicity has become a global public health issue. The purpose of the study is to investigate and analyze the influencing factors of financial toxicity in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A convenient sample of 250 patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer was investigated in the study. They completed a set of questionnaires, including the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were performed to investigate the influencing factors of financial toxicity.

RESULTS

Over half (52.8%, n = 132) of the colorectal cancer survivors experienced financial toxicity. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the factors associated with financial toxicity were young age, unemployment, low annual household income, chemotherapy, and the lack of sufficient social support (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Financial toxicity is common among non-metastatic colorectal cancer survivors. Young age, lower annual household income, unemployment, chemotherapy, and insufficient social support were associated with financial toxicity.

Quality of life and perceived burden of the primary caregiver of patients aged 70 and over with cancer 5 years after initial treatment

PURPOSE

Long-term effects of being the primary caregiver of an older patient with cancer are not known. This study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in primary caregivers of patients aged 70 and older with cancer, 5 years after initial treatment. Secondly, to compare the HRQoL between former primary caregivers whose caregiving relationship had ceased (primary caregiver no longer directly assisting the patient because of patient death or removal to another city or admission to an institution) and current caregivers, and to determine the perceived burden of the primary caregivers.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including primary caregivers of patients aged 70 and older with cancer. HRQoL and perceived burden were assessed using the SF-12 and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) at baseline and 5 years after initial treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-six caregivers were initially included; at 5 years, 46 caregivers completed the SF-12 and ZBI between June 15 and October 26, 2020. Primary caregiver's HRQoL scores had significantly decreased over time for physical functioning (mean difference = -10, p=0.04), vitality (MD= -10.5, p=0.02), and role emotional (MD= -8.1, p=0.01) dimensions. The comparison at 5 years according to caregiving status showed no difference for all HRQoL dimensions. There was no decrease in perceived burden at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Some dimensions of HRQoL decreased at 5 years with a stable low perceived burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04478903.

Family caregivers of those with cancer: quality of life outcomes from a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial

PURPOSE

To conduct a secondary analysis focused on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among caregivers engaged in a 12-week complementary therapy sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) of reflexology and/or meditative practices (MP), to manage cancer patients' symptoms.

METHODS

In this SMART, patient-caregiver dyads were initially randomized to 4 weeks of caregiver-delivered reflexology for the patient (N = 150), MP with the patient (N = 150), or control (N = 47). After 4 weeks, dyads with patients not improving on fatigue (non-responders, n = 69 to reflexology and n = 57 to MP) were re-randomized to continue the same therapy or add the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks. Week-12 caregiver HRQOL was measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Profile-29 and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment Tool (CRAT) for caregiver burden; scores were analyzed using general linear models.

RESULTS

In the comparison of 4 adaptive intervention sequences: reflexology for 8 weeks, reflexology for 4 weeks followed by MP for 4 weeks if no response to reflexology, MP for 8 weeks, and MP for 4 weeks followed by reflexology for 4 weeks if no response to MP, there were no differences in PROMIS-29 scores. However, CRAT domains of impact on schedule, family support, and finances worsened when adding reflexology after the first 4 weeks of MP. The CRAT domain of health worsened by adding either intervention compared to continuing the same one.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that caregiver engagement in more than one complementary therapy may increase caregiver burden in some domains but not affect other HRQOL domains.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02759146.