Sensing the lightness: a narrative analysis of an integrative medicine program for healthcare providers in the COVID-19 department

Parasympathetic Versus Sympathetic Changes in Heart Rate Variability After a Multimodal Integrative Medicine Intervention for Frontline COVID-19 Personnel

OBJECTIVE

Frontline healthcare providers (HCPs) working in COVID-19 hospital departments need to deal with considerable physical and emotional stress on a daily basis. We conducted a pilot study to examine changes in heart rate variability (HRV) in frontline COVID-19 personnel after an integrative medicine (IM) intervention.

METHODS

HCPs working in isolated COVID-19 inpatient departments underwent a single 30-minute individually tailored IM sessions combining various IM modalities (acupuncture, mind-body, and/or manual-movement modalities, including anthroposophic medicine). HRV parameters were compared during the first IM session at 3-minute intervals, at the beginning of treatments, and after 20 minutes. Root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD) was measured, as were domains of time (standard deviation of NN intervals, percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 milliseconds) and frequency (low frequency/high frequency [LF/HF] ratio). Preintervention and postintervention concerns were assessed using the Measure Yourself Concerns and Well-being questionnaire, with posttreatment free-text narratives analyzed for clusters of emotional- and spiritual-related keywords (ESKs).

RESULTS

A total of 114 HCPs underwent an IM treatment session, and their HRV values were measured, of which 75 (65.8%) expressed ESKs. The RMSSD increased only in the ESK-expressing group ( p < .001). LF/HF ratios decreased in both groups, with HF power increasing in the ESK-expressing ( p = .043) and LF power decreasing in the non-ESK-expressing groups ( p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased parasympathetic activity was observed in all HCPs after the IM intervention, particularly among those expressing ESKs. LF/HF parameters suggest different relaxation-associated mechanisms, with increased HF (regulated predominantly by parasympathetic tone) in the ESK-expressing and decreased LF (regulated partially by sympathetic tone) in the nonexpressing group. Additional research needs to explore the relationship between subjective effects of the IM intervention and physiological mechanisms of relaxation in HCPs working in stressful environments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05104827.

Systematic Review of Mind–Body Modalities to Manage the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Era

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have suffered physical and psychological threats since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Mind-body modalities (MBMs) can reduce the long-term adverse health effects associated with COVID-specific chronic stress. This systematic review aims to investigate the role of MBMs in managing the mental health of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive search was conducted using 6 electronic databases, resulting in 18 clinical studies from 2019 to September 2021. Meta-analysis showed that MBMs significantly improved the perceived stress of HCWs (standardized mean difference, −0.37; 95% confidence intervals, −0.53 to −0.21). In addition, some MBMs had significant positive effects on psychological trauma, burnout, insomnia, anxiety, depression, self-compassion, mindfulness, quality of life, resilience, and well-being, but not psychological trauma and self-efficacy of HCWs. This review provides data supporting the potential of some MBMs to improve the mental health of HCWs during COVID-19. However, owing to poor methodological quality and heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes of the included studies, further high-quality clinical trials are needed on this topic in the future.

Complementary and integrative medicine intervention in front-line COVID-19 clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a multidisciplinary complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) intervention on physical and emotional concerns among front-line COVID-19 healthcare providers (HCPs).

METHODS

A multimodality CIM treatment intervention was provided by integrative practitioners to HCPs in three isolated COVID-19 departments. HCPs' two main concerns were scored (from 0 to 6) before and following the CIM intervention using the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing questionnaire. Postintervention narratives identified reflective narratives specifying emotional and/or spiritual keywords.

RESULTS

Of 181 HCPs undergoing at least one CIM treatment, 119 (65.7%) completed post-treatment questionnaires. While HCPs listing baseline emotional-related concerns benefited from the CIM intervention, those who did not express emotional or spiritual concerns improved even more significantly following the first session, for both leading concerns (p=0.038) and emotional-related concerns (p=0.023). Nevertheless, it was shown that following subsequent treatments HCPs who expressed emotional and spiritual concerns improved more significantly than those who did not for emotional-related concerns (p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

A CIM intervention for front-line HCPs working in isolated COVID-19 departments can significantly impact emotional-related concerns, more so after the first treatment and among HCPs not using emotional-spiritual keywords in post-treatment narratives. Referral of HCPs to CIM programmes for improved well-being should avoid referral bias to those not expressing emotional/spiritual concerns.