Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oncologic activities (diagnosis, treatment, clinical trials enrollment) of a general hospital in a district with high prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in Italy

Humoral Response and Safety after a Fourth Dose of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccine in Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Treatment-Results of a Prospective Observational Study

Only a few studies have been carried out on the efficacy and safety of a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to assess the serological response and safety of the fourth booster shot of the BNT162b2 vaccine in 79 cancer patients, vaccinated between 1 March and 25 August 2022, under systemic anticancer therapy. The primary endpoint was to assess the increase in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; secondary endpoints were the vaccine safety and side effects. Consequently, 40 patients (50.63%) revealed the maximum detection values in their IgG titers before the fourth dose of the vaccine, while 39 patients (49.37%) did not. Primary endpoint: Of 39 patients, 36 (92.31%) showed a significant increase in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers, and 32 of them (82.05%) reached the maximum titration values. Secondary endpoints: The most common adverse events were mild in severity and included injection site pain, erythema and tiredness. The majority of the adverse reactions reported were grade 1 and no grade 3 and 4 reactions were detected. Our data provide evidence that a fourth dose of the BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is effective and safe in patients with solid tumors in active anticancer treatment.

Cancer Treatment Closer to the Patient Reduces Travel Burden, Time Toxicity, and Improves Patient Satisfaction, Results of 546 Consecutive Patients in a Northern Italian District

Background and Objectives: The distance to cancer facilities may cause disparities by creating barriers to oncologic diagnosis and treatment, and travel burden may cause time and financial toxicity. Materials and Methods: To relieve travel burden, a program to deliver oncologic treatment closer to the patient was initiated in the district of Piacenza (Northern Italy) several years ago. The oncologic activities are performed by oncologists and by nurses who travel from the oncologic ward of the city hospital to territorial centres to provide cancer patient management. This model is called Territorial Oncology Care (TOC): patients are managed near their home, in three territorial hospitals and in a health centre, named "Casa della Salute" (CDS). A retrospective study was performed and the records of patients with cancer managed in the TOC program were analysed. The primary endpoints were the km and time saved, the secondary endpoints: reduction of caregiver need for transport and patient satisfaction. Results: 546 cancer patients managed in the TOC program from 2 January 2021 to 30 June 2022 were included in this study. Primary endpoints: median km to reach the city hospital: 26 (range 11-79 km) median time: 44 min (range 32-116); median km to reach the territorial clinicians in the TOC program: 7 (range 1-35 km), median time: 16 minutes (range 6-54), p < 0.001. Secondary endpoints: 64.8% of patients who needed a caregiver for the city hospital could travel alone in the TOC program and 99.63% of patients were satisfied. Conclusions: The results of this retrospective study highlight the possibility of treating cancer patients near their residence, reducing travel burden and saving time.

Bio-ethical issues in oncology during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic: A qualitative study in a French hospital

BACKGROUND

Using a specific bioethical theory (=global bioethics) and method (=a posteriori), we try here to identify and evaluate the bio-ethical issues raised by the COVID-19 pandemic, and possible solutions, to improve the management of cancer patients at the hospital in future pandemics, before the emergence of vaccines or scientifically validated treatments.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Our work is based primarily on the clinical experience of three oncologists from the oncology department of Foch Hospital in France, who were on the frontline during the first wave of the epidemic. We compared their perceptions with published findings, to complete or nuance their views.

RESULTS

Three bio-ethical issues were identified, and possible solutions to these problems were evaluated: (1) scientific evidence versus lack of time → the creation of emergency multidisciplinary team meetings (MTM); (2) healthcare equality versus lack of resources → the development of telemedicine; (3) individual liberties versus risk of contamination → role of cancer patients' associations, psychologists and bioethicists.

CONCLUSION

We consider the creation of an emergency MTM, in particular, in addition to a true ethics committee with real competence in bioethics, to be a first solution that would be easy to implement in hospitals in many countries.

Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has significantly impacted global health and healthcare delivery systems. To characterize the secondary effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies used in the delivery of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) care, we performed a comprehensive literature search encompassing changes in specific donor collection, processing practices, patient outcomes, and patient-related concerns specific to HSCT and HSCT-related healthcare delivery. In this review, we summarize the available literature on the secondary impacts the COVID-19 pandemic on the fields of HSCT and cellular therapy. The COVID-19 pandemic has had numerous secondary impacts on patients undergoing HSCT and the healthcare delivery systems involved in providing complex care to HSCT recipients. Institutions must identify these influences on outcomes and adjust accordingly to maintain and improve outcomes for the transplantation and cellular therapy community.

New lung cancer diagnosis after emergency department presentation in a tertiary hospital: patient characteristics and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Currently there is limited data available about patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer following an emergency department (ED) visit. This study sought to define the demographics, symptoms profile, staging, and prognosis of this cohort of patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with a primary lung malignancy at a lung cancer multi-disciplinary meeting between January 2018-January 2020. Medical records were reviewed to collect data around demographics, presenting symptoms, investigations, admission, cancer stage, and mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, 890 patients were diagnosed with a primary lung malignancy of which 209 (23.5%) presented to ED prompting diagnostic work-up. Of these 209 patients, 89% were hospitalised for a median duration of 6 days. 104 (50%) were female and average age of cohort was 70 years. Dyspnoea (38%) was the most common presenting symptom. Radiological staging and tissue biopsy was performed as an outpatient procedure in 46% and 41% of patients respectively. 188 patients had non-small cell lung cancer of whom 68% had Stage IV disease. 53 (25%) patients died within 3 months of ED presentation. These patients were older with more advanced disease compared to patients who were alive at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

: Emergent diagnosed patients are a significant proportion of the lung cancer population, presenting with advanced stage disease and increased short-term mortality. Future research should be directed at interventions, such as lung cancer screening program and/or community education to reduce the need for patients to present the emergency department with disabling lung cancer symptoms.