A comparison of three preoperative nutritional assessment methods for predicting ovarian cancer patient prognosis: which is better?

Nutritional interventions during treatment for ovarian cancer: A narrative review and recommendations for future research

Most women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage III or IV), when the intraabdominal spread of the tumour impacts nutrient intake and absorption. Up to 70 % of women with ovarian cancer are malnourished and approximately 40 % are affected by muscle loss at the time of diagnosis. Women with ovarian cancer are at high risk of nutritional decline due to invasive treatment and the severity of side-effects. This review explores the evidence evaluating nutritional interventions during treatment for ovarian cancer and their effect on nutritional status, muscle mass, and clinical outcomes. Perioperative immunonutrition has been investigated with mixed results for immediate postoperative outcomes. Individualised nutrition counselling as part of a multimodal prehabilitation programme prior to surgery shows promising results; however, the effects are limited by sample size. Nutrition counselling as part of a mixed intervention with exercise shows high acceptability and suggests improvements in dietary intake and quality of life during chemotherapy treatment, while oral nutritional supplements and nutrition education appear to reduce symptom burden. Individualised nutrition counselling during treatment also appears to be associated with improved overall survival; however, the evidence is limited to a single retrospective study. A key finding from this review is that, despite the high prevalence of malnutrition and muscle loss in women with ovarian cancer and the critical importance of addressing these modifiable prognostic factors, nutrition intervention studies are limited. Prospective studies with samples large enough to provide adequate power to evaluate intervention effectiveness are urgently required to inform optimal management.

Association of prognostic nutritional index with muscle loss and survival in patients with ovarian cancer treated with primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia is prevalent in ovarian cancer and contributes to poor survival. This study is aimed at investigating the association of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with muscle loss and survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 650 patients with ovarian cancer treated with primary debulking surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy at a tertiary center from 2010 to 2019. PNI-low was defined as a pretreatment PNI of < 47.2. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured on pre- and posttreatment computed tomography (CT) at L3. The cut-off for the SMI loss associated with all-cause mortality was calculated using maximally selected rank statistics.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 4.2 years, and 226 deaths (34.8%) were observed. With a median duration of 176 days (interquartile range: 166-187) between CT scans, patients experienced an average decrease in SMI of 1.7% (P < 0.001). The cut-off for SMI loss as a predictor of mortality was - 4.2%. PNI-low was independently associated with SMI loss (odds ratio: 1.97, P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis of all-cause mortality, PNI-low and SMI loss were independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.43, P = 0.017; hazard ratio: 2.27, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with both SMI loss and PNI-low (vs. neither) had triple the risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.10, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PNI is a predictor of muscle loss during treatment for ovarian cancer. PNI and muscle loss are additively associated with poor survival. PNI can help clinicians guide multimodal interventions to preserve muscle and optimize survival outcomes.

Independent predictive value of blood inflammatory composite markers in ovarian cancer: recent clinical evidence and perspective focusing on NLR and PLR

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the deadliest malignant tumors affecting women worldwide. The predictive value of some blood inflammatory composite markers in OC has been extensively reported. They can be used for early detection and differential diagnosis of OC and can be used for predicting survival, treatment response, and recurrence in the affected patients. Here, we reviewed the predictive values of composite inflammatory markers based on complete blood count, namely neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic inflammation index and markers based on blood protein, namely C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index in OC, with a focus on NLR and PLR. We referred to the clinical studies on these six markers, reviewed the patient population, and summarized the marker cut-off values, significance, and limitations of these studies. All these studies were retrospective and most of them were single-center clinical studies with small sample sizes. We found that the cut-off values of these markers have not been unified, and methods used to determine these values varied among studies. The predictive value of these markers on survival was mainly reflected in the postoperative patients of multiple subtypes of ovarian cancer including epithelial OC, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, and ovarian clear cell carcinoma. We focused on NLR and PLR and calculated their pooled hazard ratios. NLR and PLR were reliable in predicting overall and progression-free survivals in patients with OC. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust important confounding factors and conduct a long-term follow-up prospective cohort study to further clarify the cut-off values of NLR and PLR and their clinical applications.

The Prognostic Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Controversy still exists with regard to the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in ovarian cancer. A systematic search based on the databases of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Dataset were conducted up to March 22, 2022. We included both retrospective and prospective observational studies with comparison of prognosis of patients who were divided into two groups: low and high PNI group. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to evaluate the quality of enrolled studies. All analyses were performed using Stata software. The pooled results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Finally, 12 studies involving 3,190 patients were included. High PNI group had a significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.84), progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.94) compared with the low PNI group. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias indicated our results were reliable. PNI could be applied as a promising index to predict prognosis in ovarian cancer. Our results need to be validated in future studies.