Risk factors of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies

Contemporaneous Symptom Networks of Breast Cancer-Related Upper Limb Lymphedema: A Network Analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper limb lymphedema (ULL) is a common and deliberating complication for breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Breast cancer survivors with ULL reported a wide range of symptoms. However, little is known about symptom patterns and interrelationships among them. This study was designed to explore symptom clusters and construct symptom networks of ULL-related symptoms among BCSs and to identify the core symptoms.

METHODS

This study is a secondary data analysis using datasets from three cross-sectional studies of BCSs in China. A total of 341 participants with maximum interlimb circumference ≥2 cm and complete responses in Part I of the Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index were included. Symptom clusters were identified through principal component analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis was employed to explore factors associated with severity of overall ULL-related symptoms. A contemporaneous network with 20 frequently reported symptoms were constructed after controlling for covariates.

RESULTS

Three symptom clusters, including lymph stasis symptom cluster, nerve symptom cluster, and movement limitation symptom cluster, were identified. Postsurgery time, axillary lymph node dissection, and radiotherapy were associated with the severity of ULL-related symptoms. Tightness (rs = 1.379; rscov = 1.097), tingling (rs = 1.264; rscov = 0.925), and firmness (rs = 1.170; rscov = 0.923) were the most central symptoms in both networks with and without covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors with ULL experienced severe symptom burden. Tightness, tingling, and firmness were core symptoms of ULL among BCSs. Our findings demonstrated that the assessment and targeted intervention of specific core symptoms might help to relive effectively the burden of ULL-related symptom among BCSs.

Development and psychometric testing of the lymphedema self-management support scale for breast cancer survivors

Objective

Effective self-management support should be tailored to the individual. To provide personalized and targeted self-management support, a rigorous assessment tool is needed to screen the actual degree of lymphedema self-management support received by breast cancer survivors. This study aims to develop and psychometrically test the Lymphedema Self-Management Support Scale for Breast Cancer Survivors (LSMS-BCs).

Methods

This study involves two phases: scale development and psychometric testing. In the scale development phase, preliminary items and domains were identified through a qualitative meta-synthesis, a quantitative systematic review, and reference to previous similar scales. Expert consultation and pilot study were conducted to refine the scale and evaluate the content validity. The psychometric characteristics were tested with 447 participants using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability assessments, as well as measurement invariance.

Results

A preliminary 21-item scale with four domains, basic management support, management support for limb volume reduction, role management support, and emotional management support, was constructed in the scale development phase and well supported by EFA and CFA. The scale-level content validity index was 0.983. Cronbach's α coefficient for overall scale and subscales ranged from 0.732 to 0.949. McDonald's ω ranged from 0.848 to 0.955. Excellent known-groups validity, concurrent validity, predictive validity, and measurement invariance were demonstrated.

Conclusions

The LSMS-BCs is psychometrically valid and reliable. It can serve as a valuable tool for assessing and understanding the lymphedema self-management support received by breast cancer survivors.

Incidence and risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a secondary lymphedema that occurs after breast cancer related treatments. BCRL develops from damage or dysfunction of the normally functioning lymphatic system due to surgery, radiation therapy, and rarely due to cancer recurrence. This nationwide, retrospective study was aimed at investigating the incidence and risk factors of BCRL using the database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent breast surgery from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020, were recruited. The incidence was compared by four groups according to the operation type of breast cancer [breast conserving surgery (BCS) with sentinel lymph node biopsy (S), BCS with axillary lymph node dissection (A), total mastectomy (TM) with S, modified radical mastectomy (MRM)]. The incidence rates of lymphedema were calculated by the number of incident events by the total follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the risk of incidence of lymphedema based on a patients' characteristics, breast cancer treatment, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The final cohort of operation subjects that satisfied the inclusion criteria was 34 676. BCRL occurred in 4242 patients (12.2%), and the median follow-up period was 695.4 days. The BCRL was diagnosed in the BCS with S (8.0%), BCS with A (23.5%), TM with S (10.7%), and MRM (28.5%) with an incidence of 40.8, 132.2, 55.8, and 171.8 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Young age, obesity, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, residence in metropolitan areas, and hyperlipidemia were identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In Korea, the incidence of BCRL was found to be 12.2%, with the highest risk observed among patients who underwent MRM. Therefore, surgical oncologists should meticulously assess the appropriate surgical approach and consider providing education to patients with risk factors for BCRL, aiming to ensure effective prevention strategies.

Identification Of A Higher Risk Lymphedema Phenotype And Associations With Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms

CONTEXT

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is chronic condition that occurs in 5% to 75% of women following treatment for breast cancer. However, little is known about the risk factors and mechanisms associated with a worse BCRL profile.

OBJECTIVES

Identify distinct BCRL profiles in women with the condition (i.e., lower vs. higher risk phenotype) and evaluate for associations with pro- and anti-inflammatory genes.

METHODS

Latent class profile analysis (LCPA) was used to identify the BCRL profiles using phenotypic characteristics evaluated prior to surgery. Candidate gene analyses were done to identify cytokine genes associated with the two BCRL profiles.

RESULTS

Of the 155 patients evaluated, 35.5% (n = 55) were in the Lower and 64.5% (n = 100) were in the Higher Risk classes. Risk factors for membership in the Higher class included: lower functional status, having sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, mastectomy, higher number of positive lymph nodes, and receipt of chemotherapy. Polymorphisms for interleukin (IL)1-beta and IL6 were associated with membership in the Higher Risk class.

CONCLUSION

The readily available and clinically relevant phenotypic characteristics associated with a worse BCRL profile can be used by clinicians to identify higher risk patients. If confirmed, these characteristics can be tested in predictive risk models. In addition, the candidate gene findings may guide the development of mechanistically-based interventions to decrease the risk of BCRL.

Effect of Kinesiology Taping on Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of kinesiology taping on individuals suffering from breast cancer-related lymphedema.

METHODS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, spanning from their inception date to December 20, 2023, to identify pertinent studies. Inclusion criteria comprised studies that (1) enrolled participants diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema; (2) implemented kinesiology taping as the intervention; (3) incorporated either complete decongestive therapy, exercise, or sham taping as the control treatment; and (4) included clinical measurements such as the severity of lymphedema, upper limb function assessment, quality of life, and perceived comfort.

RESULTS

Information was extracted from 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The analyses demonstrated statistically significant improvement, indicating a preference for kinesiology taping in the outcomes of upper limb functional assessment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-1.22, -0.55]), quality of life (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: [0.16, 0.84]), and perceived comfort (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI: [0.34, 1.36]).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that kinesiology taping could be considered a viable option for individuals dealing with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Nevertheless, acknowledging certain limitations within this study, further confirmation of its benefits necessitates additional larger-scale and better-designed RCTs.

Lymphovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Minimizing the Risk of Upper Extremity Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

 Studies have shown a significant reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) rates in patients undergoing complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) combined with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) using lymphovenous bypass (LVB).The purpose of this study was to determine if ILR with LVB at the time of cALND results in a decreased incidence of BCRL and its impact on patient quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

 In this prospective cohort study, patients ≥ 18 years requiring cALND underwent ILR from 2019 to 2021. The primary outcome was bilateral upper limb volumes measured by Brørson's truncated cone formula and the Pero-System (3D Körper Scanner). The secondary outcome was QOL measured by the Lymphedema Quality of Life (LYMQOL) arm patient-reported outcome measurement.

RESULTS

 Forty-two patients consented to ILR using LVB. ILR was completed in 41 patients with a mean of 1.9 ± 0.9 lymphovenous anastomosis performed. Mean age of patients was 52.4 ± 10.5 years with a mean body mass index of 27.5 ± 4.9 kg/m2. All patients (n = 39, 100%) received adjuvant therapy after ILR. Mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 5.1 months. Five patients met criteria for lymphedema throughout the duration of the study (12.8%), with two patients having resolution, with an overall incidence of 7.7% by the end of the study period. Patients with lymphedema were found to have statistically significant lower total LYMQOL values at 18 months (8.44 ± 1.17 vs. 3.23 ± 0.56, p < 0.001). A mean increase of 0.73 ± 3.5 points was observed for overall QOL average for upper limb function at 18 months compared with 3 months (t = 0.823, p = 0.425).

CONCLUSION

 This study showed an incidence of 7.7% lymphedema development throughout the duration of study. We also showed that ILR has the potential to reduce the significant long-term adverse outcomes of lymphedema and improve QOL for patients undergoing cALND.

[Update of indications and techniques for the management of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery]

OBJECTIVES

Upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment is the leading cause of lymphedema in France. Despite improved surgical practices and de-escalation of radiotherapy, the risk of lymphedema after breast cancer still affects 5-20% of patients, with this variation depending on the measurement method used and the population studied. Lymphedema has a negative impact on quality of life and body image, and their possible occurrence remains a major concern for all women treated for breast cancer. The Sénologie Commission of the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) asked four specialists in breast surgery or lymphology to prepare a summary on the prevention, medical and surgical management of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and to discuss the medical and surgical innovations currently being evaluated.

METHODS

This synthesis was based on national and international guidelines on the management of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and a recent review of the literature focusing on the years 2020-2023.

RESULTS

From a preventive point of view, the restrictive instructions imposed for a long time (reduction in physical activity or the carrying of loads, air travel, exposure to the sun or cold, etc.) have altered patients' quality of life and should no longer be recommended. A good understanding of risk factors enables us to target preventive actions. Examples include obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, axillary clearance, radiotherapy of the axillary fossa in addition to axillary clearance, total mastectomy, taxanes or anti-HER-2 therapies in the adjuvant phase. Resumption of physical activity, minimally invasive axillary surgery, de-escalation of radiotherapy and breast-conserving surgical procedures have all demonstrated their preventive value. When lymphedema does occur, early management, through complete decongestive physiotherapy, can help reduce its volume and prevent its long-term worsening.

CONCLUSION

Surgical (lymph node transplants, lympho-vascular anastomoses) and medical (prolymphangiogenic growth factors) approaches to lymphedema treatment are numerous, but require long-term evaluation of their efficacy and adverse effects.

Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) clinical practice guidance for the prevention of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL): international Delphi consensus-based recommendations

Background

Developing strategies to prevent breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL) is a critical unmet need because there are no effective interventions to eradicate it once it reaches a chronic state. Certain strategies such as prospective surveillance programs and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction have been reported to be effective in clinical trials. However, a large variation exists in practice based on clinician preference, organizational standards, and local resources.

Methods

A two-round international Delphi consensus process was performed from February 27, 2023 to May 25, 2023 to compile opinions of 55 experts involved in the care and research of breast cancer and lymphoedema on such interventions.

Findings

Axillary lymph node dissection, use of post-operative radiotherapy, relative within-arm volume increase one month after surgery, greater number of lymph nodes dissected, and high body mass index were recommended as the most important risk factors to guide selection of patients for interventions to prevent BCRAL. The panel recommended that prospective surveillance programs should be implemented to screen for and reduce risks of BCRAL where feasible and resources allow. Prophylactic compression sleeves, axillary reverse mapping and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction should be offered for patients who are at risk for developing BCRAL as options where expertise is available and resources allow. Recommendations on axillary management in clinical T1-2, node negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes were also provided by the expert panel. Routine axillary lymph node dissection should not be offered in these patients who receive breast conservation therapy. Axillary radiation instead of axillary lymph node dissection should be considered in the same group of patients undergoing mastectomy.

Interpretation

An individualised approach based on patients' preferences, risk factors for BCRAL, availability of treatment options and expertise of the healthcare team is paramount to ensure patients at risk receive preventive interventions for BCRAL, regardless of where they are receiving care.

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding. RJC received investigator grant support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1194051).

Examining the efficacy of treatments for arm lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses

Background

Lymphedema affects one in six breast cancer survivors making it a global healthcare challenge. There is considerable debate about the efficacy of different treatments for lymphedema. We aimed to summarize the current evidence for treatments for lymphedema in breast cancer survivors.

Methods

In this overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses (SRMAs), five databases were searched for SRMAs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting effects of medications, surgery, exercise, laser therapy, acupuncture, kinesio taping, or complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) for breast cancer-related lymphedema published from database inception up to March 7, 2023. Data extraction was performed for the SRMAs and RCTs, and SRMAs were appraised with AMSTAR2. Random effects meta-analyses of the RCTs provided estimates of the pooled effects sizes (Hedges' g) for each treatment modality. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020184813.

Findings

1569 studies were identified by the search and eighteen SRMAs with 51 RCTs were included, investigating manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), compression pump, exercise, kinesio taping, laser, and acupuncture. Overall, the methodological quality of the SRMAs was low. SRMAs reached different conclusions for all treatment modalities, except for kinesio taping where the two SRMAs found no effect. The analysis of 40 RCTs with 1970 participants revealed a small effect across all interventions compared to any control (g = 0.20, p = 0.047, I2 = 0.79), corresponding to volume reductions of 119.7 ml (95% CI 135-104) and 88.0 ml (95% CI 99-77) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, and a small effect of exercise (g = 0.26, p = 0.022, I2 = 0.44). The between-group differences in volume reduction were small and did not reach statistical significance for any one treatment modality.

Interpretation

Based on the available data, there is no evidence of superiority of any one treatment on volume reduction nor any solid research refuting these treatments. Thus, definitive conclusions to inform clinical practice about the efficacy of these treatments cannot be drawn. Due to poor-quality evidence, more research is needed to untangle the efficacy of each treatment component for different stages of lymphedema.

Funding

Danish Cancer Society.

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: An Umbrella Review

BACKGROUND

Identification of risk factors facilitates the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Several published systematic reviews have already addressed the risk factors for BCRL. This study aimed to systematically identify potential risk factors for BCRL and evaluate the quality of evidence.

METHODS

The study followed methodologic guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the Cochrane Handbook. The following electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to 15 November 2022: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, JBI Database, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, and PROSPERO. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodologic quality using AMSTAR2, risk of bias using ROBIS, and evidence quality using GRADE. The study evaluated overlap, assessed the small-study effect, and calculated the I2 statistic and Egger's P value as needed.

RESULTS

The study included 14 publications comprising 10 meta-analyses and 4 systematic reviews. The authors identified 39 factors and 30 unique meta-analyses. In the study, 13 innate personal trait-related risk factors, such as higher body mass index (BMI) and axillary lymph nodes dissection, showed statistically significant associations with BCRL incidence. Breast reconstruction was found to be a protective factor. The methodologic quality was low or critically low. The majority of the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were rated as having a high risk of bias. Evidence quality was low for 22 associations and moderate for 8 associations.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently identified risk factors for BCRL all are innate personal trait-related factors. Future well-designed studies and robust meta-analyses are needed to explore potential associations between behavioral-, interpersonal-, and environmental-related factors and BCRL, as well as the role of genetic variations and pathophysiologic factors.

Breast cancer survivors' experiences of barriers and facilitators to lymphedema self-management behaviors: a theory-based qualitative study

PURPOSE

Lifelong self-management plays a critical role in the prevention and management of lymphedema among breast cancer survivors. However, adherence to lymphedema self-management behaviors has remained suboptimal. Hence, we adopted a theory-informed method to elucidate the facilitators and barriers of lymphedema self-management for breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between August and October 2022 in the lymphedema nursing clinic of a tertiary cancer hospital. The maximum variation sampling technique was used to ensure a diverse sample. The ITHBC (Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change) framework was used to inform the interview outline and data analysis. Interview transcripts were coded line-by-line and mapped to domains in accordance with the ITHBC, using both deductive and inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 participants were interviewed (aged 35 to 67). Twenty-three themes (12 facilitators and 11 barriers) were mapped onto the three domains (knowledge and belief, social facilitation, and self-regulation skill and ability) of ITHBC as facilitators and barriers to lymphedema self-management. Three additional themes including limited treatment resources for lymphedema, inconvenience of lymphedema management, boredom and tedium of lymphedema self-management were categorized under the domain of other barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating these findings into the ITHBC framework allows for a more systematic selection of theory-based strategies that may improve the design of effective lymphedema self-management interventions for breast cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Elucidating impact factors, especially facilitators and barriers, for lymphedema self-management adherence is essential for developing effective intervention programs to enhance breast cancer survivors' lymphedema self-management behaviors.

Effects of combined exercises on shoulder mobility and strength of the upper extremities in breast cancer rehabilitation: a 3-week randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of mobility training with FIVE® devices in combination with device-supported strength exercises for shoulder mobility and strength of the upper extremities in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a pretest-posttest intervention study with female breast cancer patients (n = 41) who were randomly assigned to two groups by lot during their stationary follow-up treatment at a rehabilitation clinic in the south of Germany between February and March 2020. As part of exercise therapy, the intervention group (n = 24) performed a mobility training with FIVE® devices combined with device-supported strength training, whereas the control group (n = 17) completed device-supported strength training. Before and after the 3-week intervention (3 training sessions/week), shoulder mobility and isokinetic maximal strength were tested.

RESULTS

Both groups achieved significant improvements in shoulder mobility in the frontal and sagittal plane (between 3.8 and 15.35%; p < 0.05) and in strength performance (31.36% [IG] vs. 51.24% [CG]; p < 0.001). However, no robust evidence could be determined about potential interaction effects.

CONCLUSION

A combined device-supported strength and mobility training (FIVE®) showed no advantages. Therefore, a variety of exercise methods is possible in exercise therapy of breast cancer patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Since the University of Education Weingarten does not assign clinical trial registration numbers or ethical approval numbers, none could be assigned for this study.