Palliative care in Italy: the current situation

Factors Associated with Fulfilling the Preference for Dying at Home among Cancer Patients: The role of General Practitioners

Aim: This study aimed to explore clinical and care-related factors associated with fulfilling cancer patients’ preference for home death across four countries: Belgium (BE), the Netherlands (NL), Italy (IT), and Spain (ES). Methods: A mortality follow-back study was undertaken from 2009 to 2011 via representative networks of general practitioners (GPs). The study included all patients aged 18 and over who had died of cancer and whose home death preference and place of death were known by the GP. Factors associated with meeting home death preference were tested using multivariable logistic regressions. Results: Among 2,048 deceased patients, preferred and actual place of death was known in 42.6 percent of cases. Home death preference met ranged from 65.5 to 90.9 percent. Country-specific factors included older age in BE, and decisionmaking capacity and being female in the NL GPs’ provision of palliative care was positively associated with meeting home death preference. Odds ratios (ORs) were: BE: 9.9 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] 3.7–26.6); NL: 9.7 (2.4–39.9); and IT: 2.6 (1.2–5.5). ORs for Spain are not shown because a multivariate model was not performed. Conclusion: Those who develop policy to facilitate home death need to examine available resources for primary end-of-life care.

But: Cette étude avait pour objectif d'examiner les facteurs cliniques associés aux demandes des patients désirant mourir à la maison. Cette re-cherche s'étendait sur quatre pays soit la Belgique, les Pays-Bas, l'Italie, et l'Espagne. Méthode: Par l'inter-médaire des réseaux représentatifs d'omnipraticiens, nous avons pu faire un suivi rétrospectif des mortalités survenues durant les années 2009, 2010, et 2011. Cette étude comprenait les patients agés de 18 ans et plus morts du cancer et dont les médecins connaissaient tout autant les volontés de pouvoir mourir à la maison que l'endroit où les patients étaient morts. Les facteurs correspondants aux préférences des patients ont été validés à l'aide de la méthode statistique de regression logistique à variables multiples. Résultats: Parmi les 2 048 personnes décédées on connaissait, chez 42,6 pourcent d'entre elles, la préférence et l'endroit de la mort. Le choix de mourir à domicile variait de 65,5 pourcent à 90,9 pourcent. Les facteurs spécifiques à certains pays étaient l'âge avancé pour la Belgique et, pour les Pays-Bas, la capacité décisionnelle et le fait d'être de sexe feminin. La prestation des soins palliatifs par les omnipraticiens est associée de façon positive au choix de mourir à la maison. Les rapports de probabilités étaient les suivants: Belgique: 9,9 [95 pourcent d'intervalle de fiabilité (3,7–26,6)], Pays-Bas: 9,7 (2,4–39,9) et l'Italie: 2,6 (1,2–5,5). Les facteurs de probabilité pour l'Espagne ne sont pas indiqués car on n'a pas fait d'analyse selon le modèle multivariable. Conclusion: Les professionnels de la santé ayant pour tâche d'établir les politiques pour faciliter la mort à la maison doivent connnaître toutes les resources dont ils disposent dans leur communauté afin de pouvoir offrir les soins de première ligne à domicile.

Hospitalizations of cancer patients in the last month of life: quality indicator scores reveal large variation between four European countries in a mortality follow-back study

Background

Repeated and long hospitalizations of cancer patients at the end of life have been suggested as indicators of low quality of palliative care. Comparing the care delivered between different countries with the help of these quality indicators may identify opportunities to improve practice. Our objective is twofold: firstly, to describe the scores for the existing quality indicators “the percentage of time spent in hospital” and “the proportion of adult patients with more than one hospitalization in the last 30 days of life” in populations of cancer patients in four European countries and to see whether these countries met previously defined performance standards; secondly, to assess whether these scores are related to receiving palliative care from their GP.

Methods

A mortality follow-back study was conducted, based on data recorded by representative GP networks for samples of cancer patients living at home who died non-suddenly in Belgium (n = 500), the Netherlands (n = 310), Italy (n = 764), and Spain (n = 224).

Results

The quality indicator score for “the percentage of time spent in hospital” in the last month of life was 14.1% in the Netherlands, 17.7% in Spain, 22.2% in Italy, and 24.6% in Belgium, which means that none of the countries met the performance standard of <10%. For the “proportion of patients with more than one hospitalization in the last 30 days of life”, two countries met the performance standard of <4%: the Netherlands (0.6%) and Italy (3.1%). Spain had a score of 4.0% and Belgium scored 5.4%. When patients received palliative care from their GP, significantly less time was spent in hospital in the last month and fewer hospitalizations took place.

Conclusions

European countries differ regarding the frequency and duration of hospitalizations of cancer patients in the last month of life. This reflects country-specific differences in the organization of palliative care and highlights the important role of the GP in palliative care provision.

Students, Severe Illness, and Palliative Care: Results From a Pilot Study on a School-Based Intervention

This study was aimed at piloting a school-based intervention on severe illness, within a project focused on spreading knowledge of palliative care among high school students (phases 0-2 Medical Research Council Framework). The intervention entailed the screening of a topic-related movie, 2 classroom meetings, and the development of a class-based multimedia production. Five classes from 5 high schools participated in this study, and a before-after evaluation was used to assess intervention feasibility and impact. Valid questionnaires were filled in by 84% (before) and 79% (after) of the 89 students. Concerning students' knowledge on palliative care, the after evaluation showed a significantly higher paired proportions of students reporting on "improving patient quality of life" and "life-threatening illness." Intervention components were deemed helpful by students, and positive feedback on the experience was given.

Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators

Background

Dying at home and dying at the preferred place of death are advocated to be desirable outcomes of palliative care. More insight is needed in their usefulness as quality indicators. Our objective is to describe whether “the percentage of patients dying at home” and “the percentage of patients who died in their place of preference” are feasible and informative quality indicators.

Methods and Findings

A mortality follow-back study was conducted, based on data recorded by representative GP networks regarding home-dwelling patients who died non-suddenly in Belgium (n = 1036), the Netherlands (n = 512), Italy (n = 1639) or Spain (n = 565). “The percentage of patients dying at home” ranged between 35.3% (Belgium) and 50.6% (the Netherlands) in the four countries, while “the percentage of patients dying at their preferred place of death” ranged between 67.8% (Italy) and 86.0% (Spain). Both indicators were strongly associated with palliative care provision by the GP (odds ratios of 1.55–13.23 and 2.30–6.63, respectively). The quality indicator concerning the preferred place of death offers a broader view than the indicator concerning home deaths, as it takes into account all preferences met in all locations. However, GPs did not know the preferences for place of death in 39.6% (the Netherlands) to 70.3% (Italy), whereas the actual place of death was known in almost all cases.

Conclusion

GPs know their patients’ actual place of death, making the percentage of home deaths a feasible indicator for collection by GPs. However, patients’ preferred place of death was often unknown to the GP. We therefore recommend using information from relatives as long as information from GPs on the preferred place of death is lacking. Timely communication about the place where patients want to be cared for at the end of life remains a challenge for GPs.

End-of-life communication: a retrospective survey of representative general practitioner networks in four countries

CONTEXT

Effective communication is central to high-quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the prevalence of general practitioner (GP)-patient discussion of end-of-life topics (according to the GP) in Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands and associated patient and care characteristics.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks. Using a standardized form, GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life, and the discussion of 10 end-of-life topics, of all patients who died under their care. The mean number of topics discussed, the prevalence of discussion of each topic, and patient and care characteristics associated with discussions were estimated per country.

RESULTS

In total, 4396 nonsudden deaths were included. On average, more topics were discussed in The Netherlands (mean=6.37), followed by Belgium (4.45), Spain (3.32), and Italy (3.19). The topics most frequently discussed in all countries were "physical complaints" and the "primary diagnosis," whereas "spiritual and existential issues" were the least frequently discussed. Discussions were most prevalent in The Netherlands, followed by Belgium. The GPs from all countries tended to discuss fewer topics with older patients, noncancer patients, patients with dementia, patients for whom palliative care was not an important treatment aim, and patients for whom their GP had not provided palliative care.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of end-of-life discussions varied across the four countries. In all countries, training priorities should include the identification and discussion of spiritual and social problems and early end-of-life discussions with older patients, those with cognitive decline if possible, and those with non-malignant diseases.

End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appointments

BACKGROUND

Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients' appointment of surrogate decision-makers in Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands and examines associated factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks in four countries. GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life of 4,396 patients who died non-suddenly. Prevalences were estimated and logistic regressions were used to examine between country differences and country-specific associated patient and care factors.

RESULTS

GP-patient discussion of treatment preferences occurred for 10%, 7%, 25% and 47% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and of Dutch patients respectively. Furthermore, 6%, 5%, 16% and 29% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and Dutch patients had a surrogate decision-maker. Despite some country-specific differences, previous GP-patient discussion of primary diagnosis, more frequent GP contact, GP provision of palliative care, the importance of palliative care as a treatment aim and place of death were positively associated with preference discussions or surrogate appointments. A diagnosis of dementia was negatively associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed a higher prevalence of treatment preference discussions and surrogate appointments in the two northern compared to the two southern European countries. Factors associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments suggest that delaying diagnosis discussions impedes anticipatory planning, whereas early preference discussions, particularly for dementia patients, and the provision of palliative care encourage participation.

Researching a Best-Practice End-of-Life Care Model for Canada

De nos jours, la majorité des 220 000 Canadiens qui meurent chaque année, principalement de vieillesse ou des suites de problèmes de santé dégénératifs, n'ont pas accès à des centres de soins palliatifs ou spécialisés en fin de vie. Les programmes de soins palliatifs et d'hospices sont inégalement répartis au Canada, la plupart n'ont qu'une faible capacité de services, et ces services varient considérablement d'un programme à l'autre. Les services de fin de vie sont « les services qui permettent aux familles et aux amis d'aider une personne en phase terminale à vivre ses dernières semaines, ainsi que des services de soutien aux personnes en deuil. » Bien que des services de santé et des services sociaux soient disponibles, la plupart des Canadiens en phase terminale n'ont pas facilement accès à un ensemble complet de services qui pourraient les aider à traverser cette période difficile. La plupart risquent donc d'être soumis en fin de vie à des soins non coordonnés et potentiellement inadéquats. Les personnes en phase terminale sont les plus vulnérables de toutes. Le passage de la vie à la mort est souvent difficile en raison des défis émotionnels et physiques que cela engendre. Bien que le soutien des parents et des amis soit irremplaçable, les soins de fin de vie constituent une obligation publique importante.

Un projet de recherche de synthèse a été mené dans le but de déterminer un modèle des meilleures pratiques de prestation de soins de fin de vie qui favoriserait la coordination et l'intégration de ces soins au Canada. Par le truchement de visites, d'analyses documentaires, de sondages sur le web, et d'une analyse des données sur les soins à domicile, quatre éléments essentiels d'un modèle intégrant les meilleures pratiques en matière de soins en fin de vie au Canada ont été dégagés: 1) universalité, 2) coordination des soins, 3) accès assuré à un vaste éventail de soins de vie de base et spécialisés, et 4) assurance de services de fin de vie peu importe où les soins sont prodigués. Le présent modèle est proposé comme guide pour l'établissement de soins intégrés de fin de vie au Canada.

Ten years? activity of the first Italian public hospice for terminally ill patients

We present a review of the first 10 years of the hospice at the Geriatric Institute Pio Albergo Trivulzio of Milan, Italy's first public hospice for the admission of terminally ill patients. Over 1200 patients were admitted to the nine-bed hospice between October 1991 and December 2001, most of whom (63%) were referred by the Home Palliative Care Units operating in Milan. The hospice patients are elderly (nearly 60% are 70 or more years of age, median 72 years). Admission to the hospice was until the patient's death (74% of patients) after a brief time (4 weeks on average). From the very outset, we have striven to focus our attention on the daily application of the programmes of care inspired by the philosophy and practice of palliative medicine, i.e. the holistic approach and attention devoted to quality of life, multidimensional assessment, and the services of a multiprofessional team to provide, alongside medical and nursing assistance, psychosocial and spiritual support, bereavement support, etc. The continuing education of health workers and the systematic use of a clinical audit tool specifically designed for palliative care, are the two key elements which, in our judgement, have proved to be the most fruitful in reaching the objectives described above. These 10 years of the Pio Albergo Trivulzio Hospice have made a significant contribution towards defining a concrete Italian model which can be applied to the care of the terminally ill inpatient.

Needs and experiences of non-English-speaking hospice patients and families in an English-speaking country

There is increasing evidence that, in practice, hospice care is predominantly accessed by white, middle-class patients, who live in stable home environments with available caregivers and other supports. The present challenge for researchers, administrators, and clinicians is to identify populations of terminally ill patients most in need of hospice care and to direct services to these patients. As a contribution to the development of this area, this paper presents the findings from a recent Australian hospice study that examines the needs and experiences of families from non-English-speaking backgrounds. The findings indicate that it is as important to focus on similarities as it is to highlight differences.

The reality of palliative care in Spain

With the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Palliative Care (SECPAL), two nation-wide studies from the University of Valladolid were carried out in 1996 and 1998 into the state of palliative care teams in Spain. This report is based on those studies and is the first overall analysis of the current situation of palliative care in Spain. A total of 143 programmes were identified and data were collected from 128 teams (89%): 53 were programmes with hospitalised patients, 75 for home-based patients and 15 were mixed programmes. From the activity data, provided by 75% of the teams, it may be estimated that each year 22,638 terminally ill patients receive palliative care attention. Of these, 18,021 (79.6%) are cancer sufferers. Of the patients who die from cancer each year in our country, 21.2% receive palliative care during the final weeks of life. More than 10 years have passed since the first teams in Spain started their work. The time has now come to recognize the reality of palliative care in our society and to adopt a national policy for terminally ill patients, in line with World Health Organization recommendations formulated in 1989.