1
|
Wu HC, Chien KL, Jhuang JR, Yang YY, Liao WC. Peri-onset non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use and organ failure in acute pancreatitis: A multicenter retrospective analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:1023-1031. [PMID: 38228435 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ failure (OF) of acute pancreatitis (AP) significantly contributes to AP-related mortality. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with reduced complications of AP. AIMS We aimed to investigate whether NSAIDs ameliorates SIRS and OF in patients with AP. METHODS Eligible patients with AP were retrospectively identified in 4 hospitals between January 2015 and December 2018. Associations between peri-onset NSAIDs use (day -3 to day 3) and OF, persistent OF (POF), and SIRS within the first week were analyzed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis were used to estimate risk ratios. RESULTS Among 1,528 patients with AP (97 [6.3%] with NSAIDs use), 242 (15.8%) developed organ failure, 89 (5.8%) progressed to POF, and 27 (1.8%) died within 3 months. PSM analysis showed no association between peri-onset NSAIDs and OF (risk ratio [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 2.15) and POF (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.21 to 2.98). IPTW analysis yielded similar results. Patients with and without peri-onset NSAIDs use were comparable with respect to OF, POF, and SIRS across subgroups defined by COX-2 selectivity and dose. CONCLUSION Peri-onset NSAIDs use was not significantly associated with reduced OF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsing-Chien Wu
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Liong Chien
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Rong Jhuang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Yun Yang
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Liao
- Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rojas-Victoria EJ, Hernández-Ruiz SI, García-Perdomo HA. Effectiveness of the pharmacological therapy to prevent post ERCP acute pancreatitis: a network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:203-215. [PMID: 38725175 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2345640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of the different pharmacological agents in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. METHODS We included clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. The event evaluated was acute pancreatitis. We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to nowadays. We reported the information in terms of relative risks (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test. RESULTS We included 84 studies for analysis (30,463 patients). The mean age was 59.3 years (SD ± 7.01). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I2 = 34.4%) with no inconsistencies (p = 0.2567). Post ERCP pancreatitis was less in prophylaxis with NSAIDs (RR 0.65 95% CI [0.52 to 0.80]), aggressive hydration with Lactate Ringer (RR 0.32 95% CI [0.12-0.86]), NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate (RR 0.28 95% CI [0.11-0.71]) and somatostatin and analogues (RR 0.54 [0.43 to 0.68]) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS NSAIDs, the Combination of NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate, somatostatin and analogues, and aggressive hydration with lactate ringer are pharmacological strategies that can prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared to placebo. More clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness of these drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
- Division of Urology/Urooncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsumoto K, Noma H, Fujita K, Tomoda T, Onoyama T, Hanada K, Okazaki A, Hirao K, Goto D, Moriyama I, Kushiyama Y, Takenaka M, Maruo T, Matsumoto H, Asada M, Nebiki H, Katayama T, Kawamura T, Kurita A, Ueki T, Tsujimae M, Matsubara T, Yamada S, Tamura T, Marui S, Mitoro A, Isomoto H, Yazumi S, Kawamoto H. Prognostic Factors for Severe-to-Fatal Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1135. [PMID: 38398448 PMCID: PMC10889235 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The prognostic factors associated with severe-to-fatal post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) remain unclear despite the extensive number of studies on PEP. In total, 3739 ERCP patients with biliary disease with an intact papilla and indicated for ERCP were prospectively enrolled at 36 centers from April 2017 to March 2018. Those with acute pancreatitis diagnosed before ERCP, altered gastrointestinal anatomy, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > 4 were excluded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on patient-related factors, operator-related factors, procedure-related factors, and preventive measures to identify potential prognostic factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Multivariate analyses revealed pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation (OR 13.59, 95% CI 4.21-43.83, p < 0.001), post-ERCP non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration (OR 11.54, 95% CI 3.83-34.81, p < 0.001), and previous pancreatitis (OR 6.94, 95% CI 1.45-33.33, p = 0.015) as significant risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Preventive measures included endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST; OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11-0.79, p = 0.015) and prophylactic pancreatic stents (PPSs; OR 0.11, 95% CI, 0.01-0.87, p = 0.036). In biliary ERCP, pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation, NSAID administration after ERCP, and previous pancreatitis were risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP, whereas EST and PPS were significant preventive measures for severe-to-fatal PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuya Matsumoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori 683-8504, Japan; (T.O.); (H.I.)
- Irisawa Medical Clinic, Matsue 690-0025, Japan
| | - Hisashi Noma
- Department of Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa 190-8562, Japan;
| | - Koichi Fujita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka 533-0024, Japan
- First Research Department, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai, Osaka 530-8480, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tomoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan;
| | - Takumi Onoyama
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori 683-8504, Japan; (T.O.); (H.I.)
| | - Keiji Hanada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8508, Japan;
| | - Akihito Okazaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Survivor Hospital, Hiroshima 730-0052, Japan;
| | - Ken Hirao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima 730-8518, Japan;
| | - Daisuke Goto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tottori Red Cross Hospital, Tottori 680-8517, Japan;
| | - Ichiro Moriyama
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Shimane University Hospital, Innovative Cancer Center, Izumo 693-8501, Japan;
| | - Yoshinori Kushiyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Matsue 690-8506, Japan;
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University, Osaka 589-8511, Japan;
| | - Toru Maruo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; (T.M.); (T.U.)
| | - Hisakazu Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Red Cross Hospital Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan;
| | - Masanori Asada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japan Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka 543-8555, Japan;
| | - Hiroko Nebiki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka 534-0021, Japan;
| | - Toshihiro Katayama
- Help Center of Medical Research, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai, Osaka 530-8480, Japan;
| | - Takashi Kawamura
- Department of Preventive Services, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8303, Japan;
| | - Akira Kurita
- Kitano Hospital, Tazuke-Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kyoto 530-8480, Japan;
| | - Toshiharu Ueki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; (T.M.); (T.U.)
| | - Masahiro Tsujimae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka 530-0012, Japan;
| | - Tokuhiro Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8565, Japan;
| | - Satoshi Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Kobe 650-0047, Japan;
| | - Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan;
| | - Saiko Marui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan;
| | - Akira Mitoro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan;
| | - Hajime Isomoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori 683-8504, Japan; (T.O.); (H.I.)
| | - Shujiro Yazumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, PIIF Tazuke-Kofukai, Osaka 530-8480, Japan;
| | - Hirofumi Kawamoto
- General Internal Medicine 2, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama 701-0192, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
El Kurdi B, Imam Z, Abonofal A, Babar S, Shah P, Pannala R, Papachristou G, Echavarria J, Pisipati S, Jahangir S, Rajalingamgari P, Chang YHH, Singh VP. NSAIDs do not reduce severity among post-ERCP pancreatitis patients. Pancreatology 2024; 24:14-23. [PMID: 37981523 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most studied chemoprophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). While previous systematic reviews have shown NSAIDs reduce PEP, their impact on moderate to severe PEP (MSPEP) is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the impact of NSAIDs on MSPEP among patients who developed PEP. We later surveyed physicians' understanding of that impact. DESIGN A systematic search for randomized trials using NSAIDs for PEP prevention was conducted. Pooled-prevalence and Odds-ratio of PEP, MSPEP were compared between treated vs. control groups. Analysis was performed using R software. Random-effects model was used for all variables. Physicians were surveyed via email before and after reviewing our results. RESULTS 7688 patients in 25 trials were included. PEP was significantly reduced to 0.598 (95%CI, 0.47-0.76) in the NSAIDs group. Overall burden of MSPEP was reduced among all patients undergoing ERCP: OR 0.59 (95%CI, 0.42-0.83). However, NSAIDs didn't affect the proportion of MSPEP among those who developed PEP (p = 0.658). Rectal Indomethacin and diclofenac reduced PEP but not MSPEP. Efficacy didn't vary by risk, timing of administration, or bias-risk. Survey revealed a change in the impression of the effect of NSAIDs on MSPEP after reviewing our results. CONCLUSIONS Rectal diclofenac or indomethacin before or after ERCP reduce the overall burden of MSPEP by reducing the pool of PEP from which it can arise. However, the proportion of MSPEP among patients who developed PEP is unaffected. Therefore, NSAIDs prevent initiation of PEP, but do not affect severity among those that develop PEP. Alternative modalities are needed to reduce MSPEP among patients who develop PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bara El Kurdi
- Department of Internal Medicine East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Zaid Imam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Abdulrahman Abonofal
- Department of Internal Medicine East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
| | - Sumbal Babar
- Department of Internal Medicine East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
| | - Pir Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Georgios Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sailaja Pisipati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Sarah Jahangir
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Prasad Rajalingamgari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Yu-Hui H Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Vijay P Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akshintala VS, Kanthasamy K, Bhullar FA, Sperna Weiland CJ, Kamal A, Kochar B, Gurakar M, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Brewer-Gutierrez OI, Kalloo AN, Khashab MA, van Geenen EJM, Singh VK. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:1-6.e12. [PMID: 37004815 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) largely remain unknown with changing trends in ERCP use, indication, and techniques. We sought to determine the incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP in consecutive and high-risk patients based on a systemic review and meta-analysis of patients in placebo and no-stent arms of randomized control trials (RCTs). METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of each database to June 2022 to identify full-text RCTs evaluating PEP prophylaxes. The incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP from the placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs were recorded for consecutive and high-risk patients. A random-effects meta-analysis for a proportions model was used to calculate PEP incidence, severity, and mortality. RESULTS One hundred forty-five RCTs were found with 19,038 patients in the placebo or no-stent arms. The overall cumulative incidence of PEP was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-11.3), predominantly among the academic centers conducting such RCTs. The cumulative incidences of severe PEP and mortality were .5% (95% CI, .3-.7) and .2% (95% CI, .08-.3), respectively, across 91 RCTs with 14,441 patients. The cumulative incidences of PEP and severe PEP were 14.1% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) and .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6), respectively, with a mortality rate of .2% (95% CI, 0-.3) across 35 RCTs with 3733 patients at high risk of PEP. The overall trend for the incidence of PEP among patients randomized to placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs has remained unchanged from 1977 to 2022 (P = .48). CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of PEP is 10.2% but is 14.1% among high-risk patients based on this systematic review of placebo or no-stent arms of 145 RCTs; this rate has not changed between 1977 and 2022. Severe PEP and mortality from PEP are relatively uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkata S Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kavin Kanthasamy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Furqan A Bhullar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ayesha Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Merve Gurakar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Anthony N Kalloo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Erwin-Jan M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agarwal A, Mahapatra SJ, Sethia R, Agarwal S, Elhence A, Mohta S, Gunjan D, Garg PK. Universal prophylactic rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with a policy of selective pancreatic duct stenting significantly reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 2023; 42:370-378. [PMID: 37160838 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01354-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to be effective for the prevention of post-ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients, the benefit in average-risk patients is unclear. We aimed at assessing the benefit of prophylactic rectal NSAIDs in unselected consecutive patients to prevent PEP. METHODS All patients undergoing index ERCP procedures from January 2018 until March 2020 were included. All patients received prophylactic rectal diclofenac. A prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent was placed if there was repeated PD cannulation, at the discretion of the endoscopist. The frequency of PEP was compared with historical controls. RESULTS Of 769 patients who underwent ERCP, 34 (4.4%) developed PEP (mild in 29 [85.3%], moderate in four [11.8%] and severe in one [2.9%]). Female gender, precut sphincterotomy, inadvertent PD cannulation and procedural time of > 30 minutes predicted PEP in univariate analysis. Inadvertent PD cannulation (OR 4.6, 95% CI: 1.8-11.7; p < 0.001) and procedural time of > 30 minutes (OR 8.5, 95% CI: 3.7-10.1; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors on multivariate analysis. When compared with historical controls, the odds of PEP with prophylactic use of rectal NSAIDs and selective PD stenting was 0.54 (CI: 0.31-0.93, p = 0.027). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 22 to prevent one PEP with prophylactic rectal NSAIDs. CONCLUSION Routine use of prophylactic rectal NSAIDs effectively prevents the occurrence of PEP in unselected consecutive patients in a real-world scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Agarwal
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342 005, India
| | - Soumya Jagannath Mahapatra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Rahul Sethia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Samagra Agarwal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Anshuman Elhence
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Srikanth Mohta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Deepak Gunjan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Pramod Kumar Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hattori A, Yamada R, Murabayashi T, Sugimoto S, Imai H, Nojiri K, Kuroda N, Tano S, Tanaka H, Matsusaki S, Nishikawa K, Naota H, Moritani I, Kurata K, Fukui T, Tanaka K, Nakagawa H. The safety and efficacy of Ringer's solution loading with rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: The RESOLUTION-PEP study. DEN OPEN 2023; 3:e236. [PMID: 37125072 PMCID: PMC10131293 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Objectives We evaluated the safety and efficacy of aggressive hydration with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Methods This prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial was conducted at 12 institutions between October 2020 and August 2021. We enrolled 231 patients who had intact papillae and were scheduled to undergo ERCP. All patients were administered rectal diclofenac before ERCP. They received aggressive hydration with intravenous lactated Ringer's solution in an initial bolus of 5 ml/kg at the start of ERCP, followed by 3 ml/kg/h for 8 h after the procedure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included PEP severity, hyperamylasemia, and adverse events. Results The mean age of the patients was 68.8 ± 13.7 years, and 81 patients (35.1%) were 75 years or older. Thirteen patients developed PEP (5.6%, 95% confidence interval 3.0%-9.4%). There were 11 cases (4.8%) of mild pancreatitis and two cases (0.9%) of severe pancreatitis. Forty-five patients (19.5%) developed hyperamylasemia and one patient developed non-severe peripheral edema. Conclusions Aggressive hydration combined with rectal diclofenac may be a promising strategy for the prevention of PEP. Furthermore, it is safe even for older individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiji Hattori
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMie University HospitalMieJapan
- Department of GastroenterologyMatsusaka Municipal HospitalMieJapan
| | - Reiko Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMie University HospitalMieJapan
| | | | - Shinya Sugimoto
- Department of GastroenterologyIse Red Cross HospitalMieJapan
| | - Hajime Imai
- Department of GastroenterologyOkanami General HospitalMieJapan
| | - Keiichiro Nojiri
- Department of GastroenterologyKuwana City Medical CenterMieJapan
| | - Naoki Kuroda
- Department of GastroenterologySaiseikai Matsusaka General HospitalMieJapan
| | - Shunsuke Tano
- Department of GastroenterologySuzuka Kaisei HospitalMieJapan
| | - Hiroki Tanaka
- Department of GastroenterologySuzuka General HospitalMieJapan
| | | | | | - Hiroaki Naota
- Department of GastroenterologyMatsusaka Chuo General HospitalMieJapan
| | - Isao Moritani
- Department of GastroenterologyMie Prefectural General Medical CenterMieJapan
| | - Kazunari Kurata
- Department of GastroenterologyMie Chuo Medical CenterMieJapan
| | - Toshitaka Fukui
- Department of GastroenterologyYokkaichi Hazu Medical CenterMieJapan
| | - Kyosuke Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopic MedicineMie University HospitalMieJapan
| | - Hayato Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMie University HospitalMieJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A comparison of two types of contrast media used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280279. [PMID: 36608042 PMCID: PMC9821475 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most serious complications of ERCP. Various procedures can reduce the incidence of PEP, such as wire-guided cannulation, prophylactic pancreatic stent placement, and pretreatment anal insertion of NSAIDs. Recently, iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) have been used for ERCP in several hospitals to reduce the risk of PEP in Japan. However, the effect of IOCM is uncertain because few reports have examined IOCM in relation to PEP. AIM This study aimed to investigate the relationship between contrast media used and the incidence of PEP. METHODS This retrospective study included all qualifying patients who had undergone ERCP at Hamamatsu University Hospital between January 2012 and January 2020. This study examined whether there was a difference in the onset of PEP between patients administered IOCM and high osmolar contrast medium (HOCM). Propensity score matching was used to analyze patient characteristics and ERCP procedures. Amidotrizoic acid was used as HOCM and iodixanol as IOCM. RESULTS ERCP was performed on 458 patients, and 830 procedures were conducted. After propensity score matching, 162 patients from the amidotrizoic acid group and 162 patients from the iodixanol group were selected. The incidence of PEP was 10.5% (17) in the amidotrizoic acid group and 9.3% (15) in the iodixanol group (P = 0.71). Changes in serum amylase levels post- and pre-ERCP were 240.6 ± 573.8 U/L and 142.7 ± 382.1 U/L in the amidotrizoic acid and iodixanol groups, respectively (P = 0.072). CONCLUSION Iodixanol had no prophylactic effect on PEP and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sakai H, Iwai N, Sakagami J, Okuda T, Ohara T, Hattori C, Taniguchi M, Oka K, Hara T, Tsuji T, Komaki T, Kagawa K, Dohi O, Yasuda H, Konishi H, Itoh Y. Rectal administration of low-dose diclofenac does not reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2698-2705. [PMID: 36443561 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a popular technique; however, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) remains a major adverse event. The administration of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is reportedly effective in preventing PEP. However, the recommended dose varies and the efficacy of low-dose rectal NSAIDs remains unclear. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effectiveness of low-dose rectal diclofenac on PEP prevention, using propensity score matching. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 401 patients who underwent ERCP between July 2015 and March 2020. After December 2016, we administered rectal diclofenac within 30 min before the ERCP procedure as widely as possible. Patients were divided into those who did (diclofenac group) and did not (control group) receive rectal diclofenac. Patients weighing ≥ 50 kg were administered a 50 mg dose, while those weighing < 50 kg were administered a 25 mg dose. The incidence and severity of PEP in the two groups were assessed by propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Among 401 patients undergoing ERCP, 367 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 187 patients received rectal diclofenac (diclofenac group) and 180 did not (control group). After propensity score matching, 105 pairs were selected for evaluation. Overall, seven (6.7%) patients in the diclofenac group and 10 (9.5%) in the control group developed PEP (P = 0.45). Moderate or severe PEP occurred in four (3.8%) patients in the diclofenac group and six (5.7%) in the control group (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS The administration of low-dose rectal diclofenac could not reduce the incidence and severity of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Naoto Iwai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan.
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Junichi Sakagami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Takashi Okuda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Tomoya Ohara
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chie Hattori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Masashi Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Kohei Oka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Tasuku Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Komaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Keizo Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, 231 Atsunaka-Cho, Fukuchiyama-City, Kyoto, 620-8505, Japan
| | - Osamu Dohi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yasuda
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Konishi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saito H, Fujimoto A, Oomoto K, Kadowaki Y, Tada S. Current approaches and questions yet to be resolved for the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:657-666. [PMID: 36438884 PMCID: PMC9693687 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Prophylaxis is important for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), which is the most common and serious complication of ERCP. Although the current guidelines include independent patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP and available PEP prophylactic measures, the synergistic effect of these risk factors on PEP should also be considered, given that patients often harbor multiple risk factors. Furthermore, a combination of prophylactic measures is often selected in clinical practice. However, established methods estimating the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP incidence are lacking, and evidence on the impact of combining prophylactic measures on PEP should be discussed. Selection of appropriate candidate patients for ERCP is also important to reduce the incidence of PEP associated with unnecessary ERCP. ERCP indications in patients with asymptomatic common bile duct stones (CBDSs) and in those with suspected CBDSs with no imaging-based evidence of stones are controversial. Further studies are warranted to predict the synergistic effect of independent risk factors on PEP, determine the best prophylactic PEP measures, and identify appropriate candidates for ERCP in patients with asymptomatic CBDSs and those with suspected CBDSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirokazu Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto City 862-8505, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Atsushi Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto City 862-8505, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kana Oomoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto City 862-8505, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Kadowaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto City 862-8505, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shuji Tada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto City 862-8505, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Du F, Zhang Y, Yang X, Zhang L, Yuan W, Fan H, Ren L. Efficacy of Combined Management with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Prevention of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1982-1997. [PMID: 35680777 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05352-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone or in combination with other agents for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanography. METHODS We carried out a literature search of random controlled trials (RCTs) on preventing post-operative pancreatitis by administration of the anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin and diclofenac, following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The databases searched for relevant publications up to July 7, 2021, included PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. We screened the literature according to inclusion criteria and analyzed the extracted data. The overall population and high-risk patient groups were analyzed, with the main outcome being the incidence of PEP. RESULTS The search identified 32 RCTs that included 15019 patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis and 9 different interventions. The results of the overall population network meta-analysis showed that NSAIDs alone, high-dose NSAIDs, and a combination of NSAIDs significantly reduced the incidence of PEP compared with placebo. However, compared with placebo, there was no statistically significant difference between the two interventions (NSAIDs + standard hydration and high-dose NSAIDs). In addition, NSAIDs + sublingual nitrates were associated with a lower incidence of PEP compared to that observed with NSAIDs alone. Probability ranking results showed that NSAIDs + sublingual nitrate had the best effect, followed by NSAIDs + standard hydration, NSAIDs + melatonin, NSAIDs + aggressive hydration, NSAIDs + somatostatin, NSAIDs alone, NSAIDs + epinephrine, high-dose NSAIDs, and placebo. In the high-risk subgroup, the results of the network meta-analysis showed that NSAIDs alone, high-dose NSAIDs, and a combination of NSAIDs showed no statistically significant difference in their ability to reduce the incidence of PEP compared with placebo. Probability ranking results showed that NSAIDs + hydration had the best effect, followed by NSAIDs + sublingual nitroglycerin and NSAIDs + aggressive hydration. CONCLUSION Of the nine interventions, NSAIDs + sublingual nitrates had considerably better efficacy than the other drugs for reducing the incidence of PEP in the overall population. In high-risk patients, NSAIDs + standard hydration may be the best preventive treatment; however, more randomized, controlled trials are needed to validate our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION Name of the registry: PROSPERO-International prospective register of systematic reviews. Unique identifying number or registration ID: CRD42021282205.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Yongxuan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Xiaozhou Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Lingkai Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Wencong Yuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Haining Fan
- Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.,Qinghai Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis Research, Xining, 810000, China
| | - Li Ren
- Graduate School of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China. .,Qinghai Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis Research, Xining, 810000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shi QQ, Huang GX, Li W, Yang JR, Ning XY. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glyceryl trinitrate, or combinations for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A network meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7859-7871. [PMID: 36158503 PMCID: PMC9372852 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is the most common and severe complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Recent evidence suggests that combinations based on rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are more beneficial in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also demonstrated the efficacy of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare NSAIDs and GTN for prevention of PEP and to determine whether they are better in combination.
AIM To compare NSAIDs and GTN for prevention of PEP and to determine whether they are better in combination.
METHODS A systematic search was done for full-text RCTs of PEP in PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials database. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen for eligible RCTs. The major data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The frequentist model was used to conduct this network meta-analysis and obtain the pairwise OR and 95%CI. The data were then extracted and assessed on the basis of the Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/).
RESULTS Twenty-four eligible RCTs were selected, evaluating seven preventive strategies in 9416 patients. Rectal indomethacin 100 mg plus sublingual GTN (OR: 0.21, 95%CI: 0.09–0.50), rectal diclofenac 100 mg (0.34, 0.18–0.65), sublingual GTN (0.34, 0.12–0.97), and rectal indomethacin 100 mg (0.49, 0.33–0.73) were all more efficacious than placebo in preventing PEP. The combination of rectal indomethacin and sublingual GTN had the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) probability of (92.2%) and was the best preventive strategy for moderate-to-severe PEP with a SUCRA probability of (89.2%).
CONCLUSION Combination of rectal indomethacin 100 mg with sublingual GTN offered better prevention of PEP than when used alone and could alleviate the severity of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing-Qing Shi
- Department of Health Management Center, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Guo-Xiu Huang
- Department of Health Management Center, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Health Management Center, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Jian-Rong Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreas and Spleen Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Ning
- Department of Hematology, The Frist People’s Hospital of Nanning, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takeshita K, Asai S, Fujimoto N, Ichinona T, Akamine E, Takenaka M. Safety of rectal indomethacin (100 mg) for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the Japanese population: A single-center prospective pilot study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:406-408. [PMID: 34503926 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Takeshita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka 550-0025, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Asai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka 550-0025, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka 550-0025, Japan
| | - Takumi Ichinona
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka 550-0025, Japan
| | - Eisuke Akamine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka 550-0025, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama 589-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Koshitani T, Konaka Y, Ohishi T, Yasuda T, Morinushi T, Mita M, Masuda M, Nakano K, Fuki S, Nakagawa S. Prophylaxis of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Using Temporary Pancreatic Stents Versus Rectal Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pancreas 2022; 51:663-670. [PMID: 36099496 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Both pancreatic stenting and rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. The aim of the study was to compare post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) prophylaxis using pancreatic stents and/or rectal NSAIDs prospectively. METHODS A total of 321 patients undergoing ERCP were studied. Each patient was randomly allocated to receive pancreatic stent placement (PS), 50 mg of rectal diclofenac (NSAID), or both (PS + NSAID) for PEP prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the occurrence rate of PEP, and secondary outcomes included the severity of PEP and serum pancreatic amylase and lipase levels on the day after ERCP. RESULTS Five patients (PS: 2/101, NSAID: 1/106, PS + NSAID: 2/102) developed PEP, and the overall occurrence rate of PEP was 1.6% (5/309). The occurrence rates of PEP in the PS, NSAID, and PS + NSAID groups were statistically equivalent with an equivalent margin of 10%. The severity of PEP was mild in all 5 patients. Median serum pancreatic amylase and lipase levels in the NSAID group were significantly lower than those in the PS and PS + NSAID groups. CONCLUSIONS Rectal administration of 50 mg of diclofenac may become a first-line therapy for PEP prophylaxis in our country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Koshitani
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Yoshitomo Konaka
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Takashi Ohishi
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Tomoyo Yasuda
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Tatsuo Morinushi
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Masaki Mita
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Masataka Masuda
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Keimei Nakano
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | - Shuichi Fuki
- From the Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kobe Central Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Takada T, Isaji S, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Takeyama Y, Itoi T, Sano K, Iizawa Y, Masamune A, Hirota M, Okamoto K, Inoue D, Kitamura N, Mori Y, Mukai S, Kiriyama S, Shirai K, Tsuchiya A, Higuchi R, Hirashita T. JPN clinical practice guidelines 2021 with easy-to-understand explanations for the management of acute pancreatitis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:1057-1083. [PMID: 35388634 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In preparing the Japanese (JPN) guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis 2021, the committee focused the issues raised by the results of nationwide epidemiological survey in 2016 in Japan METHOD: In addition to a systematic search using the previous JPN guidelines, papers published from January 2014 to September 2019 were searched for the contents to be covered by the guidelines based on the concept of GRADE system. RESULTS Thirty-six clinical questions (CQ) were prepared in 15 subject areas. Base on the facts that patients diagnosed with severe disease by both Japanese prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced CT grade had a high fatality rate and that little prognosis improvement after 2 weeks of disease onset was not obtained, we emphasized the importance of Pancreatitis Bundles, which was shown to be effective in improving prognosis, and the CQ sections for local pancreatic complications had been expanded to ensure adoption of a step-up approach. Furthermore, on the facts that enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis was not started early within 48 hours of admission and that unnecessary prophylactic antibiotics was used in almost all cases, we emphasized early enteral nutrition in small amounts even if gastric feeding is used and no prophylactic antibiotics in mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSION All the members of the committee have put a lot of effort into preparing the extensively revised guidelines in the hope that more people will have a common understanding and that better medical care will be spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadahiro Takada
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Isaji
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Mayumi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health & Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Takeyama
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiji Sano
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iizawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Atsushi Masamune
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Morihisa Hirota
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kohji Okamoto
- Department of Surgery, Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Kitakyushu City Yahata Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Dai Inoue
- Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Nobuya Kitamura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Mori
- Department of Surgery I, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shuntaro Mukai
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiki Kiriyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Shirai
- Department of Emergency, Disaster and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Asuka Tsuchiya
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ryota Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teijiro Hirashita
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Radadiya D, Brahmbhatt B, Reddy C, Devani K. Efficacy of Combining Aggressive Hydration With Rectal Indomethacin in Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:e239-e249. [PMID: 33769395 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (ERCP). No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared the efficacy of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommended interventions for PEP prevention. We assessed the effectiveness of these interventions using network meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify RCTs investigating guideline-recommended interventions and their combinations [rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): indomethacin or diclofenac, pancreatic stent (PS), aggressive hydration (AH), sublingual nitrate) for PEP prevention. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analysis, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve to rank interventions. Subgroup network meta-analysis for high-risk populations was also performed. We identified a total of 38 RCTs with 10 different interventions. Each intervention was protective against PEP on direct and network meta-analysis compared with controls. Except AH+diclofenac and NSAIDs+ sublingual nitrate, AH+indomethacin was associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP compared with PS [odds ratio (OR), 0.09; credible interval (CrI), 0.003-0.71], indomethcin+PS (OR, 0.09; CrI, 0.003-0.85), diclofenac (OR, 0.09; CrI, 0.003-0.65), AH (OR, 0.09; CrI, 0.003-0.65), sublingual nitrate (OR, 0.07; CrI, 0.002-0.63), and indomethacin (OR, 0.06; CrI, 0.002-0.43). AH with either rectal NSAIDs or sublingual nitrate had similar efficacy. AH+indomethacin was the best intervention for preventing PEP with 95.3% probability of being ranked first. For high-risk patients, although the efficacy of PS and indomethacin were comparable, PS had an 80.8% probability of being ranked first. AH+indomethacin seems the best intervention for preventing PEP. For high-risk patients, PS seems the most effective strategy. The potential of combination of interventions need to be explored further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bhaumik Brahmbhatt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Chakradhar Reddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN
| | - Kalpit Devani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Prisma Health, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Park TY, Kang H, Choi GJ, Oh HC. Rectal NSAIDs-based combination modalities are superior to single modalities for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a network meta-analysis. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:322-339. [PMID: 35168302 PMCID: PMC8925947 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2021.410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Different modalities have been employed to reduce the risk and severity of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, there has been a paucity of studies comparing the efficacy of various prophylactic modalities for preventing PEP. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the relative efficacy of pancreatic duct stents and pharmacological modalities for preventing PEP. METHODS We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify and analyze all randomized controlled studies published until June 2020 that examined the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stents, rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) based regimens, hydration, and their combinations for the prevention of PEP. The primary outcome was the frequency of PEP. An NMA was performed to combine direct and indirect comparisons of different prophylactic modalities. RESULTS The NMA included 46 studies evaluating 18 regimens in 16,241 patients. Based on integral analysis of predictive interval plots, and expected mean ranking and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, combination prophylaxis with indomethacin + lactated Ringer's solution (LR), followed by diclofenac + nitrate and indomethacin + normal saline, was found to be the most efficacious modality for the overall prevention of PEP. Indomethacin + LR, followed by diclofenac and pancreatic duct stents, was the most efficacious modality for high-risk groups. CONCLUSION Rectal NSAIDs-based combination regimens with aggressive hydration or nitrate are superior to single modalities for the prevention of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Young Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Geun Joo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hyoung-Chul Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang Q, Deng DH, Liu J, Chen WW, Chen J, Chen CW. Application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:198-203. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i4.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most important methods for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in clinical prevention of PEP, but the application standards are not unified. This article reviews the progress in the research of the preventive effect of different types of NSAIDs on PEP, their administration routes, timing, and dosage, and combination with other drugs, as well as the preventive effect of NSAIDs in different risk stratification populations, and points out that indomethacin and diclofenac are the most commonly used types of NSAIDs, which should be given at 100 mg via rectal administration before ERCP in all non-selected patients with no contraindications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhang
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Deng-Hao Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wei-Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Juan Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chao-Wu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zeng C, Zhang Y, Yang H, Hong J. Prevention of pancreatitis after stent implantation for distal malignant biliary strictures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:141-154. [PMID: 35020545 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2027239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biliary stent placement remains a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary strictures (DMBS). The incidence of post-ERCP-pancreatitis (PEP) significantly increases in patients receiving fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). AREAS COVERED This review provides an overview of prevention of PEP after stent implantation for DMBSs. The following operational variables were evaluated: (1) stent type (plastic or metal stent); (2) stent location (above or across the sphincter of Oddi); (3) prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement; (4) endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database were searched to identify eligible studies up to October 2021. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using fixed- or random- effects models. EXPERT OPINION 1. PEP occurs more frequently in DMBS patients with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to that plastic stent (PS). 2. The PEP incidence is higher in covered stents than that in uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMS), but not significantly. 3. PEP incidence increases in patients receiving transpapillary FCSEMS placement, particularly when there is an absence of pancreatic duct dilation, and prophylactic pancreatic stenting is recommended for these patients. 4. Limited studies with small sample indicate that there is no significant difference in PEP incidence between transpapillary and suprapapillary stents placement for DMBS. 5. Limited studies indicate that EST does not significantly affect the incidence of pancreatitis in DMBS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanfei Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yiling Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Junbo Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Paez LF, Cury MDS, Mello MPM, Campos DND, Rodrigues BER. POST ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PANCREATITIS PROPHYLAXIS: EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT NSAID REGIMENS. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2021; 58:270-275. [PMID: 34705958 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a widely used therapeutic modality for the pancreaticobiliary tree. However, it is responsible for the highest rates of complications among the endoscopic procedures, especially post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. The preventive methods include mechanical and pharmacological approaches, such as the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of two different strategies using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, and to clarify the uncertainty about the route of administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of this complication. METHODS This was a prospective trial. Two therapeutic groups were compared with a control group that was composed of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, performed in the same service and by the same team in the period preceding the study (historical series), without the administration of any type of prophylaxis. The first group received 100 mg rectal diclofenac. The second group received 100 mg intravenous ketoprofen. Both groups were compared, separately and jointly, with the control group. RESULTS Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis occurred in 4.39% (12/273) of the participants. In the group without prophylaxis, the incidence was 6.89% (10/145). Among those who received intravenous ketoprofen, the incidence was 2.56% (2/78). No cases of acute post-procedural pancreatitis were observed in the group that received rectal diclofenac (0/52). Although there was no statistical difference between the therapeutic groups when they were separately analyzed, a statistical difference in the prevention of post-procedural pancreatitis was observed when they were analyzed together (P=0.037). CONCLUSION This study provides evidence for the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loyna Flores Paez
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dietrich CF, Bekkali NL, Burmeister S, Dong Y, Everett SM, Hocke M, Ignee A, On W, Hebbar S, Oppong K, Sun S, Jenssen C, Braden B. Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 11:186-200. [PMID: 34677145 PMCID: PMC9258020 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the series of papers on controversies of biliopancreatic drainage procedures is to discuss the pros and cons of the varying clinical practices and techniques in ERCP and EUS for drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts. The first part focuses on indications, clinical and imaging prerequisites before ERCP, sedation options, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) prophylaxis, and other related technical topics. In the second part, specific procedural ERCP-techniques including precut techniques and its timing as well as management algorithms are discussed. In addition, controversies in EUS-guided bile duct and pancreatic drainage procedures are under preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China; Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Department of Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Noor L Bekkali
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Burmeister
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Michael Hocke
- Medical Department, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany
| | - Andre Ignee
- Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Uhlandstr 7, D-97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Wei On
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Srisha Hebbar
- University Hospitals of North Midlands, North Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Kofi Oppong
- HPB Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Siyu Sun
- Endoscopy Center, Sheng Jing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Markisch-Oderland, Strausberg; Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound at Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Barbara Braden
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yu S, Shen X, Li L, Bi X, Chen P, Wu W. Rectal indomethacin and diclofenac are equally efficient in preventing pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in average-risk patients. JGH Open 2021; 5:1119-1126. [PMID: 34621996 PMCID: PMC8485396 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Rectal indomethacin and diclofenac are promising drugs for prevention of post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, their prophylactic effect on PEP in average‐risk patients remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of rectal indomethacin and diclofenac in average‐risk patients, and to indirectly compare the prophylactic effect of the two drugs. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on rectal indomethacin or diclofenac for prophylaxis against PEP. Fixed‐ and random‐effects models weighted by the Mantel–Haenszel method were used for direct comparisons. The adjusted indirect treatment comparison method was used to indirectly compare the efficacy of indomethacin and diclofenac. A total of 10 RCTs, including 2928 patients, met our inclusion criteria. No significant publication bias was identified. Pooled estimates showed that rectal indomethacin and diclofenac were associated with a significant reduction in the overall risk of PEP compared with control intervention [relative risk (RR) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46–0.83] in average‐risk patients. Subgroup analyses showed that both rectal indomethacin (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49–0.94) and diclofenac (RR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23–0.75) were effective in the prevention of PEP. Indirect comparison showed no significant difference between the effectiveness of the two drugs in the prevention of PEP (RR = 1.607; 95% CI: 0.824–3.136). The updated meta‐analysis suggests that both drugs provide equivalent protection against PEP in average‐risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| | - Xumu Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| | - Liang Li
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| | - Xiaofei Bi
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maeda N, Higashimori A, Nakatani M, Mizuno Y, Nakamura Y, Ikeda D, Maruyama H, Morimoto K, Fukuda T, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y. A 25 mg rectal dose of diclofenac for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in elderly patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1109-1116. [PMID: 34328810 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1946134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
A 50-100 mg rectal dose of diclofenac or indomethacin is recommended for prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP); however, limited data are available regarding the appropriate dose to prevent PEP in elderly patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 25 mg diclofenac in preventing PEP in elderly patients. Material and methods: Overall, 276 patients with naive papilla, aged over 75 years, were included in the present study between April 2013 and March 2020. We retrospectively evaluated the risk of PEP in patients over 75 years, administered with or without 25 mg diclofenac 30 min before ERCP using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Results: Patients were categorized into the diclofenac group (83 patients) or non-diclofenac group (193 patients). The incidence rate of PEP in the diclofenac group was significantly lower than that in the non-diclofenac group (4% vs. 14%, p = .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that 25 mg diclofenac was an independent protective factor against PEP in elderly patients aged over 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.04-0.67; p = 0.01). This protective effect of diclofenac against PEP remained robust after IPTW analysis (OR = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.03-0.40; p = .001). No adverse events related to diclofenac were observed. Conclusion: Diclofenac (25 mg) was considered effective and safe for preventing PEP in elderly patients. Our results may provide a new strategy for preventing PEP in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsumi Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Higashimori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masami Nakatani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuki Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Maruyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenichi Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Minami Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshio Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Fujiwara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Takaori A, Ikeura T, Hori Y, Ito T, Nakamaru K, Masuda M, Mitsuyama T, Miyoshi H, Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Okazaki K, Naganuma M. Rectally Administered Low-Dose Diclofenac Has No Effect on Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Propensity Score Analysis. Pancreas 2021; 50:1024-1029. [PMID: 34629455 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the preventive effect of low-dose diclofenac (25-50 mg) on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) by propensity score matching analysis. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 515 patients who underwent ERCP for the first time with or without the rectal administration of low-dose diclofenac before the procedure. For the purpose of minimization of the intrinsic selection bias, we compared the incidence rate of PEP between the diclofenac and control group after propensity score matching. RESULTS Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 15 patients (2.9%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PEP between the diclofenac (2.4%) and control group (3.3%) (P = 0.608). One hundred ninety matched pairs were generated by propensity score matching and analyzed; however, the incidence rate of PEP was the same in both groups (2.1%, P = 1.000). In the subgroup analysis using data of patients with high-risk factors for developing PEP, the incidence rate of PEP was comparable between the diclofenac (3.8%) and control groups (4.0%) (P = 0.917). CONCLUSIONS In our propensity score analysis, rectal administration of low-dose diclofenac was not shown to be useful in preventing PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaka Takaori
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Tsukasa Ikeura
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Yuichi Hori
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Takashi Ito
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Koh Nakamaru
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Masataka Masuda
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | | | - Hideaki Miyoshi
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Makoto Takaoka
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | | | - Makoto Naganuma
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kwak N, Yeoun D, Arroyo-Mercado F, Mubarak G, Cheung D, Vignesh S. Outcomes and risk factors for ERCP-related complications in a predominantly black urban population. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 7:bmjgast-2020-000462. [PMID: 32943462 PMCID: PMC7500190 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective There is a lack of literature on postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications in predominantly black urban populations of low socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of post-ERCP complications in this patient population. Design Retrospective review of ERCP cases performed at two hospitals from 2007 to 2017 was performed. The categories of complications evaluated were overall complications, severe or fatal complications, pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation and cardiopulmonary events. Predictors of complications were determined by univariate analysis. Results A total of 1079 ERCP procedures were reviewed. There were 106 complications (9.8%). Twenty-one were severe (1.9%) and 20 were fatal (1.9%). Both post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and post-ERCP bleeding occurred in 18 patients (1.7%) each. Risk factors for overall complications were male sex (OR 1.54), ASA grade IV or V (OR 2.19), prior history of PEP (OR 6.98) and pancreatic duct stent placement (OR 2.75). Those who were ASA grade III or lower (OR 0.4) or who underwent biliary stone extraction (OR 0.62) had fewer complications. PEP was more likely in those with a prior history of PEP (OR 37.6). Those with a suspected or known biliary duct stone had less frequent pancreatitis (OR 0.32). Post-ERCP bleeding was more likely in the presence of cholangitis (OR 8.72). Conclusion Outcomes of ERCP in a predominantly black urban population demonstrate a lower incidence of PEP and all-cause mortality compared with historical data reported in the general population. Potential risk factors for post-ERCP complications were identified but require larger studies for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Kwak
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Yeoun
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Fray Arroyo-Mercado
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Ghassan Mubarak
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Derrick Cheung
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Shivakumar Vignesh
- Division of Gastroenterology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oh HC, Kang H, Park TY, Choi GJ, Lehman GA. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis with a combination of pharmacological agents based on rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:1403-1413. [PMID: 33068012 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Rectally administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective but suboptimal in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis or PEP. New trials with the combination of rectal NSAIDs and other pharmacological agents have been conducted. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the relative efficacy of combination regimens and identify an optimal regimen for preventing PEP. METHODS We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify and analyze all the randomized controlled studies published until October 15, 2019, examining rectal NSAIDs and their combination with other pharmacological agents for the prevention of PEP. The primary outcome was the frequency of PEP. We conducted an NMA to combine the direct and indirect comparisons of rectal NSAIDs and their combination with other pharmacological agents. RESULTS The NMA included 24 studies evaluating 14 regimens in 11 321 patients. According to predictive interval plot and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, indomethacin + lactated Ringer's solution, followed by diclofenac + nitrate and indomethacin + normal saline, is the most efficacious combination of pharmacological agents for the overall prevention of PEP. Rectal indomethacin alone is the most efficacious agent for prevention of moderate to severe PEP, and rectal diclofenac is the most useful agent for prevention of PEP among the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS Rectal indomethacin with intravenous hydration and rectal diclofenac with sublingual nitrate are the most efficacious combination regimens for the overall prevention of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoung-Chul Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Geun Joo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Glen A Lehman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dubravcsik Z, Hritz I, Keczer B, Novák P, Lovász BD, Madácsy L. Network meta-analysis of prophylactic pancreatic stents and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of moderate-to-severe post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2021; 21:704-713. [PMID: 33926821 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an ongoing debate that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or prophylactic pancreatic stents (PPS) are more beneficial in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). In our present network meta-analysis, we aimed to compare PPSs to rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of moderate and severe PEP in average- and high-risk patients. METHODS We performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCT) from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central databases. RCTs using prophylactic rectal NSAIDs or PPSs in patients subjected to ERCP at average- and high-risk population were included. The main outcome was moderate and severe PEP defined by the Cotton criteria. Pairwise Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, and interventions were ranked based on surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. RESULTS Seven NSAID RCTs (2593 patients), and 2 PPS RCTs (265 patients) in the average-risk, while 5 NSAID RCTs (1703 patients), and 8 PPS RCTs (974 patients) in the high-risk group were included in the final analysis. Compared to placebo, only PPS placement reduced the risk of moderate and severe PEP in both patient groups (average-risk: RR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.002-0.58], high-risk: RR = 0.20, 95% CI [0.051-0.56]) significantly. Rectal NSAID also reduced the risk, but this effect was not significant (average-risk: RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.22-1.3], high-risk: RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.18-2.3]). Based on SUCRA, PPS placement was ranked as the best preventive method. CONCLUSION Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement but not rectal NSAID seems to prevent moderate-to-severe PEP better both, in average- and high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsolt Dubravcsik
- Department of Gastroenterology, BKM Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.
| | - István Hritz
- Center for Therapeutic Endoscopy, 1st Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bánk Keczer
- Center for Therapeutic Endoscopy, 1st Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Novák
- Department of Gastroenterology, BKM Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | | | - László Madácsy
- Department of Gastroenterology, BKM Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary; Endo-kapszula Private Medical Center, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tomoda T, Kato H, Miyamoto K, Matsumi A, Ueta E, Fujii Y, Saragai Y, Yamazaki T, Uchida D, Matsumoto K, Horiguchi S, Tsutsumi K, Okada H. Efficacy of low dose rectal diclofenac for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Propensity score-matched analysis. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:656-662. [PMID: 32881078 DOI: 10.1111/den.13828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a major adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decreases the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). However, the efficacy of low dose rectal NSAIDs for preventing PEP remains controversial. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 301 patients with native papilla and a body weight of <50 kg who underwent ERCP between September 2010 and October 2019. After July 2016, a 25 mg dose of rectal diclofenac was routinely administered within 15 min before ERCP (NSAIDs group, n = 72) and the control group (n = 229) consisted of patients undergoing ERCP before this date without treatment. We compared the incidence of PEP between the two groups using propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 66 pairs of patients in each group were selected. The patients and procedural-related factors were similar in both groups. In total, 15 patients (11.4%) developed PEP: 12.1% (8/66) in the NSAIDs group and 10.6% (7/66) in the control group (Odds ratio (OR) 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.5; P = 0.78). There was no significant difference in incidence of other adverse events related to ERCP between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic administration of a 25 mg dose of rectal diclofenac did not reduce the incidence of PEP in patients with a native papilla and a body weight of <50 kg in this study and a certain dose of rectal NSAIDs, such as a 100-mg dose, should be administered regardless of body weight to prevent PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Tomoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hironari Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuya Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Eijiro Ueta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuuki Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yousuke Saragai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiro Yamazaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Daisuke Uchida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shigeru Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Tsutsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Serrano JPR, Jukemura J, Romanini SG, Aguilar PFG, Castro JSLD, Torres IT, Pulla JAS, Neto OM, Taglieri E, Ardengh JC. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug effectivity in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:469-487. [PMID: 33269056 PMCID: PMC7677884 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i11.469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary therapeutic procedure for the treatment of diseases affecting the biliary tree and pancreatic duct. Although the therapeutic success rate of ERCP is high, the procedure can cause complications, such as acute pancreatitis [post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)], bleeding and perforation.
AIM To assess the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing PEP during follow-up.
METHODS Databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Library were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of NSAIDs and placebo for the prevention of PEP were included. Outcomes evaluated included the incidence of PEP, severity of pancreatitis, route of administration, types, dose, and timing of administration of NSAIDs.
RESULTS Twenty-six RCTs were considered eligible with a total of 8143 patients analyzed. Overall, 4020 patients used NSAIDs before ERCP and 4123 did not use NSAIDs (control group). Ultimately, 298 cases of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis were diagnosed in the NSAID group and 484 cases in the placebo group. The risk of PEP was lower in the NSAID group risk difference (RD): -0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.07 to - 0.03; number needed to treat (NNT), 25; P < 0.05. NSAID use effectively prevented mild pancreatitis compared to placebo use (2.5% vs 4.1%; 95%CI: -0.05 to -0.01; NNT, 33; P < 0.05), but information on moderate PEP and severe PEP could not be fully elucidated. Only rectal administration reduced the incidence of PEP with RD: -0.06; 95%CI: -0.08 to -0.04; NNT, 17; P < 0.05). Furthermore, only the use of diclofenac or indomethacin was effective in preventing PEP, at a dose of 100 mg, which must be administered before performing ERCP.
CONCLUSION Rectal administration of diclofenac and indomethacin significantly reduced the risk of developing mild PEP. Additional RCTs are needed to compare the efficacy between NSAID routes of administration in preventing PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - José Jukemura
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Samuel Galante Romanini
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo 01409002, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Isabela Trindade Torres
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo 01409002, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Otavio Micelli Neto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo 01409002, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eloy Taglieri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo 01409002, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Celso Ardengh
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo 01409002, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shou-xin Y, Shuai H, Fan-guo K, Xing-yuan D, Jia-guo H, Tao P, Lin Q, Yan-sheng S, Ting-ting Y, Jing Z, Fang L, Hao-liang Q, Man L. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic stents in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22672. [PMID: 33080710 PMCID: PMC7571888 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 100 mg rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic stents both significantly reduce the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Direct comparison of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between them in high-risk patients is absent. We conducted this network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the efficacies of 100 mg rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic stents in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients and help us decide which is preferred in clinical practice. METHODS A comprehensive search was done to identify RCTs published in English full-text. Interventions included 100 mg rectal NSAIDs (diclofenac or indomethacin) and pancreatic stents. Only studies with high-risk patients of PEP were included. Meta-analyses of NSAIDs and pancreatic stents were conducted respectively. A network meta-analysis using the Bayesian method was performed. RESULTS We included 14 RCTs, 8 on pancreatic stents and 6 on 100 mg rectal NSAIDs in high-risk patients. There was no direct comparison between them. After excluding an outlier study on NSAIDs (n = 144), meta-analyses showed they both significantly and statistically reduced the incidence of PEP in high-risk patients (pancreatic stents: n = 8 studies, random-effects risk ratio (RR)0.41, 95%CI 0.30-0.56, I = 0%; NSAIDs: n = 5 studies, random-effects RR 0.37, 95%CI 0.25-0.54, I = 0%). And network meta-analysis showed efficacy of 100 mg rectal NSAIDs was equal to pancreatic stents (random-effects RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.50-1.8). CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of 100 mg rectal NSAIDs (diclofenac or indomethacin) seems equally significant to pancreatic stents in preventing PEP in high-risk patients. Considering the cost-effectiveness and safety, 100 mg diclofenac or indomethacin may be preferred.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ahmad W, Okam NA, Torrilus C, Rana D, Khatun MK, Jahan N. Pharmacological Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: Where Do We Stand Now? Cureus 2020; 12:e10115. [PMID: 33005532 PMCID: PMC7523742 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequently occurring complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PEP is associated with significant morbidity and mortality; that is why the prevention of PEP is essential. Pharmacoprevention holds a central position in PEP prophylaxis. The current literature explores the efficacy of various pharmacological agents in preventing PEP, their routes of administration, and the correct administration timing. Data was collected on PubMed using regular keywords, the latter yielded 2077 papers. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 218 papers were selected and screened and 28 studies were finally chosen after the removal of duplicate and irrelevant studies. The selected 28 articles comprised 25 randomized clinical trials and three systematic reviews. The study concludes that rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) administered before ERCP are effective in preventing PEP in high-risk patients. The efficacy of rectal NSAIDs in low to medium risk group is not well established. A combination of rectal NSAIDs and intravenous hydration provides improved prophylaxis against PEP in high-risk patients than NSAIDs alone. Nafamostat, sublingual nitrates, and intravenous hydration are potential alternatives in patients with contraindications to NSAIDs.
Collapse
|
32
|
Katoh T, Kawashima K, Fukuba N, Masuda S, Kobatake H, Masaki K, Araki Y, Kawano K, Nishi K, Takenaka M, Ishihara S, Kinoshita Y. Low-dose rectal diclofenac does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in low- or high-risk patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:1247-1253. [PMID: 31788849 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The most common adverse event following an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure is post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration has shown promise to reduce the risk of PEP in high-risk patients. However, in contrast to high-risk patients, the role of NSAID administration in patients with low risk remains controversial. METHODS We performed a prospective, single-center, single-blinded, two-arm parallel group, randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy of low dose (50 mg) rectal NSAID administration for preventing PEP in at-risk patients. Patients scheduled to undergo ERCP were randomized into two groups, those with and without rectal administration of diclofenac. Patients in the diclofenac group received 50 mg of rectal diclofenac 30 min before undergoing ERCP. The primary endpoint was rate of PEP. RESULTS A total of 303 were randomized into the study groups. Four patients declined participation following randomization, and another two were withdrawn. As a result, a total of 147 patients were assigned to the diclofenac group and 150 to the control group. The baseline and procedural characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary endpoint of PEP occurrence was seen in 13 of 297 patients (4.4%), including eight (5.4%) in the diclofenac group and five (3.3%) in the control group (P = 0.286). Additionally, those results were not significantly different when patients were classified as low or high risk. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic low-dose rectal diclofenac did not reduce the incidence of PEP following ERCP in patients classified as low or high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Katoh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kousaku Kawashima
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Fukuba
- Department of Internal Medicine, Izumo City General Medical Center, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Shigeto Masuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiroko Kobatake
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kousaku Masaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Araki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koichiro Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Katsuhisa Nishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, 137-1 Shioya, Sumoto, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shunji Ishihara
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Kinoshita
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.,Department of Medicine, Steel Memorial Hirohata Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Park TY, Oh HC, Fogel EL, Lehman GA. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Korean J Intern Med 2020; 35:535-543. [PMID: 32392660 PMCID: PMC7214369 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2020.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is the most common and feared adverse event associated with performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Unremitting effort has been made for over 40 years to minimize the frequency and severity of this complication. Recently, the use of rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have opened a new era for its prevention. This review focuses on the role of NSAIDs in pancreatitis, the pharmacokinetics of these agents, and summarizes the results of clinical trials with rectal NSAIDs alone and combination regimens in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoung-Chul Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence to Hyoung-Chul Oh, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06973, Korea Tel: +82-2-6299-3149 Fax: +82-2-6299-3119 E-mail:
| | - Evan L. Fogel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Glen A. Lehman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rectal Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Postoperative Pancreatitis Prevention: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54:305-313. [PMID: 32011404 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of ERCP procedure. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are reported to be one protective pharmacological agent with great efficacy regarding this complication. Recently, more trails have addressed this issue and some inconsistent results appeared. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different rectal NSAIDs schemes to prevent PEP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible studies published on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science before November 2018 were reviewed, and those which met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The preventions were divided as placebo/no treatment, post-ERCP rectal diclofenac, pre-ERCP rectal diclofenac, post-ERCP rectal indomethacin, pre-ERCP rectal indomethacin, indomethacin using during ERCP, and pre-ERCP rectal naproxen. The main outcomes included the incidence of PEP and its severity. Other complications were also analyzed. RESULTS A total of 23 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of network meta-analysis illustrated that compared with the control, post-ERCP rectal diclofenac, pre-ERCP rectal diclofenac, and indomethacin were significantly associated with lower incidences of PEP. Moreover, it is notable that pre-ERCP rectal NSAIDs might reduce the severity of pancreatitis. Also, rectal NSAIDs may lead to less occurrence of asymptomatic hyperamylasemia. On the basis of the clustered ranking, pre-ERCP diclofenac appeared to be the superior intervention for PEP with satisfying efficacy. CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that pre-ERCP diclofenac is the optimal prevention method for PEP. However, more high quality head-to-head randomized controlled trials and observational studies are expected in the future.
Collapse
|
35
|
Tamura T, Ogura T, Takenaka M, Tanioka K, Itonaga M, Yamao K, Kamata K, Hirono S, Okada KI, Imanishi M, Higuchi K, Yamaue H, Kitano M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with biliary neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E513-E522. [PMID: 32258373 PMCID: PMC7089788 DOI: 10.1055/a-1107-2629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Treatment of biliary neoplasms often involves multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related procedures. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) may prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ES for prevention of PEP in patients with biliary neoplasm. Methods Patients with biliary duct neoplasm who underwent ERCP between January 2006 and December 2016 were enrolled. The frequency of PEP was compared between the ES and non-ES groups using propensity score analysis. The effectiveness of ES in subgroups of patients who underwent biliary duct stent placement, intraductal ultrasound (IDUS), and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy was analyzed by logistic regression. Results Of the 362 patients enrolled, 84 (23.2 %) developed PEP. Propensity score matching for PEP risk factors in 172 ERCP procedures showed that the frequency of PEP in the ES group was lower than that in the non-ES group (19.7 % vs. 33.7 %). Non-ES was also an independent risk factor for PEP in patients who underwent intraductal ultrasound and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy (RR = 4.54 and 5.26), but was not an independent risk factor for PEP in patients with biliary duct stents. In addition, there was no evidence that the frequency of PEP was statistically different between patients with plastic stents and metal stents in the ES and non-ES groups ( P = 0.14 and 0.10). Conclusions ES is an effective technique to prevent PEP in patients with biliary neoplasms. In particular, ES is a safe technique to prevent PEP when performing IDUS and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kensuke Tanioka
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ken Kamata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Okada
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Miyuki Imanishi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Higuchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nawaz MH, Sarwar S, Nadeem MA. Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Risk factors and role of NSAIDs in primary prophylaxis. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36:426-431. [PMID: 32292447 PMCID: PMC7150400 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine efficacy of diclofenac suppository in reducing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and identify risk factors for PEP. Methods: This is a placebo-based prospective study at Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences / Services Hospital, Lahore performed from January 2018 to June 2019. Patients were randomized to receive diclofenac suppository or glycerine suppository before ERCP. Both groups were compared for PEP using chi square x2 test while risk factors for PEP were determined using binary logistic regression. Results: Total of 165 patients with mean age 49.1(±15.2) and male to female ratio 1/1.6 (63/102) were included. Among 82 (49.7%) patients in diclofenac group, 8 (9.7%) developed pancreatitis while 19(22.9%) of 83(50.3%) in placebo group had PEP (p value 0.02). After multivariate analysis, age>45 years (p value 0.014, OR 3.2), Bilirubin >3 mg/dl (p value 0.004 OR 3.58), time to cannulation> 5 minutes (p value<0.000 OR 9.2), use of precut (p value< 0.000 OR 4.9), pancreatic duct cannulation (p value 0.000 OR 5.46) and total procedure time >30 minutes (p value 0.01 OR 3.92) were risk factors for PEP. Conclusion: Pre-procedure Diclofenac suppository reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis. Age > 45 years, serum bilirubin > 3 mg/dl, cannulation time > 5 minutes, use of precut, pancreatic duct cannulation and procedure time > 30 minutes are risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Haseeb Nawaz
- Dr. Muhammad Haseeb Nawaz, MBBS, Post Graduate Resident, Medical Unit-III, Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shahid Sarwar
- Dr. Shahid Sarwar, MBBS, FCPS (Med), FCPS (Gastroenterol), MCPS-HPE, FRCP (Edin) Associate Professor, Medical Unit-III, Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Arif Nadeem
- Prof. Dr. Muhammad Arif Nadeem MBBS, FCPS (Medicine), Medical Unit-III, Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Njei B, McCarty TR, Muniraj T, Sharma P, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR, Varadarajulu S, Navaneethan U. Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and endoscopic interventions for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a network meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E29-E40. [PMID: 31921982 PMCID: PMC6949176 DOI: 10.1055/a-1005-6366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims While several interventions may decrease risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, it remains unclear whether one strategy is superior to others. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pharmacologic and endoscopic interventions to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis among high-risk patients. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database through May 2017. Interventions included: rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aggressive hydration with lactated ringer's (LR) solution, and pancreatic stent placement compared to placebo. Only studies with patients at high-risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were included. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed and relative ranking of treatments was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Results We identified 29 trials, comprising 7,862 participants comparing four preventive strategies. On network meta-analysis, compared with placebo, rectal NSAIDs (B = - 0.69, 95 % CI [-1.18; - 0.21]), pancreatic stent (B = - 1.25, 95 % CI [-1.81 to -0.69]), LR (B = - 0.67, 95 % CI [-1.20 to -0.13]), and combination of LR plus rectal NSAIDs (B = - 1.58; 95 % CI [-3.0 to -0.17]), were all associated with a reduced risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pancreatic stent placement had the highest SUCRA probability (0.81, 95 % CI [0.83 to 0.80]) of being ranked the best prophylactic treatment. Conclusions Based on this network meta-analysis, pancreatic stent placement appears to be the most effective preventive strategy for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basile Njei
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Thomas R. McCarty
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Thiruvengadam Muniraj
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Prabin Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yale New Haven Health-Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
| | - Priya A. Jamidar
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Harry R. Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Shyam Varadarajulu
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, United States
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Postoperative Pancreatitis Prevention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1991-2001. [PMID: 30251071 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3967-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE There is controversy regarding the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for prophylaxis against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) postoperative pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of NSAIDs for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected RCTs were pooled under a fixed effects model to generate the relative risks (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Nineteen RCTs involving a total of 5031 patients (2555 in the intervention group and 2476 in the control group) were selected. Overall, NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.64, I2 = 40.4%) and moderate to severe PEP (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67, I2 = 0%) compared with the control group. Subgroup analyses were performed according to route of administration (rectal or other), type of NSAIDs (diclofenac, indomethacin, or other), timing of administration (pre-ERCP, post-ERCP, or other), and patient population (high risk or general). Subgroup analyses showed difference in clinical efficacy of NSAID prophylaxis regardless of route, timing, or specific type of NSAID. CONCLUSION NSAIDs were associated with a significant reduction in risk of PEP and moderate to severe PEP compared to the control group.
Collapse
|
39
|
Pekgöz M. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4019-4042. [PMID: 31413535 PMCID: PMC6689803 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i29.4019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is comparatively complex application. Researchers has been investigated prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), since it has been considered to be the most common complication of ERCP. Although ERCP can lead various complications, it can also be avoided.
AIM To study the published evidence and systematically review the literature on the prevention and treatment for PEP.
METHODS A systematic literature review on the prevention of PEP was conducted using the electronic databases of ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library for relevant articles. The electronic search for the review was performed by using the search terms “Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis” AND “prevention” through different criteria. The search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed between January 2009 and February 2019. Duplicate studies were detected by using EndNote and deleted by the author. PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were adopted for evaluation and reporting. The reference lists of the selected papers were also scanned to find other relevant studies.
RESULTS 726 studies meeting the search criteria and 4 relevant articles found in the edited books about ERCP were identified. Duplicates and irrelevant studies were excluded by screening titles and abstracts and assessing full texts. 54 studies were evaluated for full text review. Prevention methods were categorized into three groups as (1) assessment of patient related factors; (2) pharmacoprevention; and (3) procedural techniques for prevention. Most of studies in the literature showed that young age, female gender, absence of chronic pancreatitis, suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, recurrent pancreatitis and history of previous PEP played a crucial role in posing high risks for PEP. 37 studies designed to assess the impact of 24 different pharmacologic agents to reduce the development of PEP delivered through various administration methods were reviewed. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used to reduce risks for PEP. Rectal administration of indomethacin immediately prior to or after ERCP in all patients is recommended by European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines to prevent the development of PEP. The majority of the studies reviewed revealed that rectally administered indomethacin had efficacy to prevent PEP. Results of the other studies on the other pharmacological interventions had both controversial and promising results. Thirteen studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 4 distinct procedural techniques to prevent the development of PEP were reviewed. Pancreatic Stent Placement has been frequently used in this sense and has potent and promising benefits in the prevention of PEP. Studies on the other procedural techniques have had inconsistent results.
CONCLUSION Prevention of PEP involves multifactorial aspects, including assessment of patients with high risk factors for alternative therapeutic and diagnostic techniques, administration of pharmacological agents and procedural techniques with highly precise results in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Pekgöz
- Department of Gastroenterology, VM Medical Park Bursa Hospital, Bursa 16022, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tomoda T, Kato H, Ueki T, Akimoto Y, Hata H, Fujii M, Harada R, Ogawa T, Wato M, Takatani M, Matsubara M, Kawai Y, Okada H. Combination of Diclofenac and Sublingual Nitrates Is Superior to Diclofenac Alone in Preventing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1753-1760.e1. [PMID: 30772342 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Acute pancreatitis is a major adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decreases the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Little is known about the combined effects of sublingual nitrate and NSAIDs. We performed a randomized trial to assess whether the combination of NSAIDs and sublingual nitrate is more effective than NSAIDs alone in preventing PEP. METHODS In a prospective superiority trial, eligible patients underwent ERCP at 12 endoscopic units in Japan, from March 2015 through May 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given diclofenac suppositories (50 mg) within 15 minutes after the endoscopic procedure alone (diclofenac-alone group, n = 442) or in combination with sublingual isosorbide dinitrate (5 mg) 5 minutes before the endoscopic procedure (combination group, n = 444). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of PEP. RESULTS PEP developed in 25 patients in the combination group (5.6%), and in 42 patients in the diclofenac-alone group (9.5%) (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.95; P = .03). Moderate to severe pancreatitis developed in 4 patients (0.9%) in the combination group, and 10 patients (2.3%) in the diclofenac-alone group (relative risk 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.13-1.26; P = .12). There was no serious adverse event related to the additional administration of sublingual nitrate. CONCLUSIONS In a randomized controlled trial, we found that prophylaxis with rectal diclofenac and sublingual nitrate significantly reduces the overall incidence of PEP compared with diclofenac suppository alone. ClinicalTrials.gov, no: UMIN 000016274.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Tomoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Hironari Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toru Ueki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan
| | - Yutaka Akimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan
| | - Hidenori Hata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kanonji, Japan
| | - Masakuni Fujii
- Department of Internal Medicine, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ryo Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tsuneyoshi Ogawa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masaki Wato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takatani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan
| | - Minoru Matsubara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sumitomo Besshi Hospital, Niihama, Japan
| | - Yoshinari Kawai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi Municipal Hospital, Onomichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lai JH, Hung CY, Chu CH, Chen CJ, Lin HH, Lin HJ, Lin CC. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of single-dose and double-dose administration of rectal indomethacin in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15742. [PMID: 31096538 PMCID: PMC6531188 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The before-procedure or after-procedure rectal indomethacin administration was shown to be useful in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. We designed this prospective randomized study to compare the efficacy of single-dose and double-dose rectal indomethacin administration in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS We enrolled patients who underwent the ERCP in Taipei Mackay Memorial Hospital from 2016 June to 2017 November. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: single and double-dose groups. The primary endpoint was the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS A total 162 patients participated in this study, and there were 87 patients randomly assigned to the single-dose group, and 75 patients were assigned to the double-dose group. In the high-risk patients, the incidence of PEP was lower in double-dose patients (4.8%) than the single-dose patients (9.5%), but there was no significant difference (P =.24). Difficult cannulation was the only 1 risk factor for PEP after rectal indomethacin treatment. CONCLUSIONS Single-dose rectal indomethacin administration immediately after ERCP in general population is good enough to prevent PEP, but difficult cannulation could induce the PEP frequency up to 15.4% even under rectal indomethacin use.
Collapse
|
42
|
Serrano JPR, de Moura DTH, Bernardo WM, Ribeiro IB, Franzini TP, de Moura ETH, Brunaldi VO, Salesse MT, Sakai P, De Moura EGH. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus placebo for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E477-E486. [PMID: 30957004 PMCID: PMC6445649 DOI: 10.1055/a-0862-0215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary therapeutic procedure for treatment of diseases that affect the biliary tree and pancreatic duct. While the therapeutic success rate of ERCP is high, the procedure can cause complications, such as acute pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing PEP following (ERCP). Materials and methods We searched databases, such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of NSAIDs and placebo for the prevention of PEP were included. Outcomes assessed included incidence of PEP, severity of pancreatitis, route of administration, and type of NSAIDs. Results Twenty-one RCTs were considered eligible with a total of 6854 patients analyzed. Overall, 3427 patients used NSAIDs before ERCP and 3427 did not use the drugs (control group). In the end, 250 cases of acute pancreatitis post-ERCP were diagnosed in the NSAIDs group and 407 cases in the placebo group. Risk for PEP was lower in the NSAID group (risk difference (RD): -0.05; 95 % confidence interval (CI): -0.07 to - 0.03; number need to treat (NNT), 20; P < 0.05). Use of NSAIDs effectively prevented mild pancreatitis compared with use of placebo (2.5 % vs. 4.1 %; 95 % CI, -0.05 to - 0.01; NNT, 33; P < 0.05), but the information on moderate and severe PEP could not be completely elucidated. Only rectal administration reduced incidence of PEP (6.8 % vs. 13 %; 95 % CI, -0.10 to - 0.04; NNT, 20; P < 0.05). Furthermore, only diclofenac or indomethacin use was effective in preventing PEP. Conclusions Rectal administration of diclofenac and indomethacin significantly reduced risk of developing mild PEP. Further RCTs are needed to compare efficacy between NSAID administration pathways in prevention of PEP after ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pablo Román Serrano
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil,Corresponding author Igor Braga Ribeiro, MD 255 – Instituto Central – Prédio dos Ambulatórios – PinheirosAv. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho AguiarCEP: 05403-000 – São Paulo, SPBrazil+551130697579
| | - Tomazo Prince Franzini
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo Sakai
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shih HY, Hsu WH, Kuo CH. Postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2019; 35:195-201. [PMID: 30887733 DOI: 10.1002/kjm2.12040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been a mainstay examination to clarify the biliary and pancreatic system. Not just diagnostic purpose, it could achieve therapeutic goal. Under the trend of more and more procedures about ERCP being interventional, the rate of adverse events after the procedure is increasing. Among them, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and sometimes tremendous complication. This mini-review will overview the PEP from definition, pathogenesis, and risk factors to prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Yao Shih
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hung Hsu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hung Kuo
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brito HP, Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, Bernardo WM, Chaves DM, Kuga R, Maahs ED, Ishida RK, de Moura ETH, de Moura EGH. Video capsule endoscopy vs double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis of small bowel bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10:400-421. [PMID: 30631404 PMCID: PMC6323498 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare the diagnostic accuracy of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) of vascular origin. METHODS MEDLINE (via PubMed), LILACS (via BVS) and Cochrane/CENTRAL virtual databases were searched for studies dated before 2017. We identified prospective and retrospective studies, including observational, cohort, single-blinded and multicenter studies, comparing VCE and DBE for the diagnosis of OGIB, and data of all the vascular sources of bleeding were collected. All patients were subjected to the same gold standard method. Relevant data were then extracted from each included study using a standardized extraction form. We calculated study variables (sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy) and performed a meta-analysis using Meta-Disc software. RESULTS In the per-patient analysis, 17 studies (1477 lesions) were included. We identified 3150 exams (1722 VCE and 1428 DBE) in 2043 patients and identified 2248 sources of bleeding, 1467 of which were from vascular lesions. Of these lesions, 864 (58.5%) were diagnosed by VCE, and 613 (41.5%) were diagnosed by DBE. The pretest probability for bleeding of vascular origin was 54.34%. The sensitivity of DBE was 84% (95%CI: 0.82-0.86; heterogeneity: 78.00%), and the specificity was 92% (95%CI: 0.89-0.94; heterogeneity: 92.0%). For DBE, the positive likelihood ratio was 11.29 (95%CI: 4.83-26.40; heterogeneity: 91.6%), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.20 (95%CI: 0.15-0.27; heterogeneity: 67.3%). Performing DBE after CE increased the diagnostic yield of vascular lesion by 7%, from 83% to 90%. CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of detecting small bowel bleeding from a vascular source is increased with the use of an isolated video capsule endoscope compared with isolated DBE. However, concomitant use increases the detection rate of the bleeding source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélcio Pedrosa Brito
- Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-00, Brazil
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-00, Brazil
| | | | | | - Dalton Marques Chaves
- Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-00, Brazil
| | - Rogério Kuga
- Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-00, Brazil
| | - Ethan Dwane Maahs
- Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| | - Robson Kiyoshi Ishida
- Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-00, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Okuno M, Shiroko J, Taguchi D, Yamaguchi K, Takada J, Imai S, Sato H, Thanabashi S. The Effectiveness of the Rectal Administration of Low-dose Diclofenac for the Prevention of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Intern Med 2018; 57:2289-2294. [PMID: 29607957 PMCID: PMC6148161 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0554-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective A 50-100-mg rectal dose of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; diclofenac or indomethacin) has been shown to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, this is higher than the recommended 25-mg dose that is commonly administered to Japanese patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 25-mg rectal dose of diclofenac in preventing PEP. Methods Between January 2016 and March 2017, a total of 147 patients underwent ERCP with or without the rectal administration of diclofenac (25 mg) 20 min before the procedure. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this dose in preventing PEP. Results Thirteen patients (8.8%) developed PEP: 3 patients (4.1%) in the diclofenac group and 10 (13.7%) in the control group (p=0.0460). After ERCP, there were no cases of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ulceration, acute renal failure, or death. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the non-administration of rectal diclofenac was a risk factor for PEP (odds ratio=3.530; 95% confidence interval=1.017-16.35; p=0.0468). Conclusions A 25-mg rectal dose of diclofenac might prevent PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | - Junko Shiroko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | - Daisuke Taguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | | | - Jun Takada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | - Susumu Imai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Xu Y, Du W. What is impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2018; 18:106. [PMID: 29973142 PMCID: PMC6032784 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0837-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, although studies have investigated the role of NSAIDs in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), selection of the ideal drug, the time and route of its administration for the appropriate population remain controversial. Methods A systematic search was done in sources including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov from from August 1, 1990 to August 1, 2017. Randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic use of NSAIDs versus a placebo were included. Statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software to assess the outcomes. Results A total of 21 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Our study showed that NSAIDs significantly reduced the incidence of PEP (RR, 0.61, 95%CI,0.52–0.72; p < 0.00001). The analysis showed that indomethacin administration post-ERCP (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31–0.70; p = 0.0002) appeared to be more effective in preventing PEP than indomethacin administration pre-ERCP (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45–0.79; P = 0.0003), but there was no significant difference between the high-risk and average-risk population(p = 0.13). In the diclofenac group, it was noted that administration of diclofenac pre-ERCP (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16–0.63; p = 0.001) was more effective than that in post-ERCP (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.27–1.599; p = 0.35). The relative risk of PEP was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.27–1.50; p = 0.30) in high-risk patients and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.17–0.98; p = 0.02) in average-risk patients. With regard to the route of administration, PEP decreased significantly only in patients receiving the drug rectally (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44–0.63; p < 0.00001), but not for those who received intramuscularly (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47–1.17; p = 0.20), intravenously (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.51–1.83; p = 0.93), and orally (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55–0.1.43; p = 0.62). Conclusions Rectal administration of NSAIDs (both indomethacin and diclofenac) was effective in preventing PEP in unselected patients. A single dose of indomethacin after ERCP might be effective in preventing PEP in both high-risk and average-risk patients. However, diclofenac administered rectally before ERCP might be protective against PEP in high-risk patients compared to a placebo. However, more high quality head-to-head RCTs are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Lyu
- Department of General Surgery, Dongyang people's Hospital, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Yunxiao Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Dongyang people's Hospital, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Dongyang people's Hospital, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yueming Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Dongyang people's Hospital, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Weibing Du
- Department of General Surgery, Dongyang people's Hospital, Dongyang, 322100, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ryozawa S, Itoi T, Katanuma A, Okabe Y, Kato H, Horaguchi J, Fujita N, Yasuda K, Tsuyuguchi T, Fujimoto K. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30:149-173. [PMID: 29247546 DOI: 10.1111/den.13001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) has recently compiled guidelines for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) using evidence-based methods. Content regarding actual clinical practice, including detailed endoscopic procedures, instruments, device types and usage, has already been published by the JGES postgraduate education committee in May 2015 and, thus, in these guidelines we avoided duplicating such content as much as possible. The guidelines do not address pancreatic sphincterotomy, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). The guidelines for EPLBD are planned to be developed separately. The evidence level in this field is often low and, in many instances, strong recommendation has to be determined on the basis of expert consensus. At this point in time, the guidelines are divided into six items including indications, techniques, specific cases, adverse events, outcomes, and postoperative follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shomei Ryozawa
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Katanuma
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hironari Kato
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Horaguchi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naotaka Fujita
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Yasuda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Use of NSAIDs via the Rectal Route for the Prevention of Pancreatitis after ERCP in All-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:1027530. [PMID: 29576766 PMCID: PMC5822867 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1027530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the rectal administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). We searched database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing periprocedural rectal administration of NSAIDs with placebo for the prevention of PEP. The rectal administration of NSAIDs significantly decreased the incidence of PEP in the whole patient population (odds ratio (OR): 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30–0.64, P < 0.0001), high-risk patients (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19–0.58, P = 0.0001), and all-risk patients (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31–0.84, P = 0.008). The incidence of PEP was reduced by indomethacin (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.82, P = 0.004) and diclofenac (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15–0.46, P < 0.00001). The administration of NSAIDs before (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.73, P = 0.002) or after (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.27–0.56, P < 0.00001) ERCP reduced PEP. The NSAIDs were associated with a reduction in mild PEP (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36–0.83, P = 0.004) and moderate-to-severe PEP (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28–0.79, P = 0.004). The rectal administration of NSAIDs reduced the incidence of PEP in high-risk and all-risk patients.
Collapse
|
49
|
Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y, Akashi R, Hanada K, Ito T, Kanno A, Kida M, Miyagawa H, Yamaguchi T, Mayumi T, Takeyama Y, Shimosegawa T. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:1013-1022. [PMID: 28653082 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-017-1359-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERPC) is used for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is a complication which needs special care and clinical practice guideline for this morbidity is also needed. METHODS The key clinical issues of diagnosis and treatment of PEP were listed and checked, and then the clinical questions were formulated. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Ichushi-web (Japanese medical literature) were used as databases. For the study of diagnostic test accuracy, items similar to QUADAS-2, i.e., random selection from a population to which the diagnostic test is applied, blinding of index tests and reference tests, completeness of reference standard, completeness of test implementations, the same timing of tests, and missing data were assessed as well as the indirectness of the study subjects, index tests, reference standard, and outcomes. Grading of recommendations was determined as strong or weak. In clinical practice, the judgment of attending doctors should be more important than recommendations described in clinical practice guidelines. Gastroenterologists are the target users of this clinical practice guideline. General practitioners or general citizens are not supposed to use this guideline. The guideline committee has decided to include wide clinical issues such as etiological information, techniques of ERCP, the diagnosis, treatments, and monitoring of PEP in this guideline. RESULTS In this concise report, we described ten clinical questions, recommendations, and explanations pertaining to risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, treatments, and preventive interventions in the medical practice for PEP. CONCLUSIONS We reported here the essence of the clinical practice guideline for PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Mine
- Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
| | | | | | - Ryukichi Akashi
- Kumamoto City Medical Association Health Care Center, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Tetsuhide Ito
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kanno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Kida
- Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | | | | | - Toshihiko Mayumi
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li L, Han Z, Yuan H, Zhang G, Jia Y, He C. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2017; 24:520-529. [PMID: 28681997 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several recent studies suggested that nonsteroidal anti-inflammation drugs (NSAIDs) could prevent the pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, the routes of administration, the dosages of NSAIDs and the potential efficacy in reducing the severity of pancreatitis remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of NSAIDs for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) prophylaxis. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Elsevier and Web of Science databases up to 1 October 2016 for relevant studies. RESULTS A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the controls, the risk of pancreatitis was much lower in the NSAIDs group (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48-0.67, P < 0.0001). However, NSAIDs were not effective in reducing the risk of moderate to severe pancreatitis compared with placebo (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-1.00). In the subanalyses, rectal administration was the only effective route (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.42-0.62), and the risk of PEP was reduced in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.76) and case-control articles (C-Cs) (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.58). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic administration of NSAIDs reduced the incidence of PEP in both RCTs and C-Cs, especially when rectally administered, but was not effective in reducing the risk of moderate to severe pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Zhen Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Heming Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Guozheng Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Yuliang Jia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Chiyi He
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|