Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 II. Extrapancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis): A comprehensive review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon fibro-inflammatory disorder precipitated by autoimmune/inflammatory reactions. Currently, there are two clinical subtypes of AIP (type 1 [AIP-1] and type 2 [AIP-2]) that correspond to two histologic descriptors (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis, respectively). While our understanding of AIP-1 has evolved considerably over the years, little is known about AIP-2 due to its rarity, often leading to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and even unnecessary surgical resection. Compared to AIP-1, AIP-2 exhibits distinct clinical and histologic features. Because AIP-2 is a pancreas-restricted disease without a specific serum marker, the evaluation of histologic features (e.g., granulocytic epithelial lesions) is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Patients with AIP-2 respond well to glucocorticoids, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies as a promising alternative therapy. The prognosis of AIP-2 is generally favorable and relapse is uncommon. Here, we provide an overview of our current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, therapeutic regimens, prognosis, and putative mechanisms underlying AIP-2. Notably, the diagnostic differentiation between AIP-2, especially the mass-forming/focal type, and pancreatic cancer is important, but challenging. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy has a key role, but novel diagnostic markers and modalities are clearly needed.

Amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2020

In response to the latest knowledge and the amendment of the Japanese diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in 2018, the Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP in 2013 were required to be revised. Three committees [the professional committee for developing clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists; the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method; and the evaluating committee of moderators] were organized. Twenty specialists in AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from a total of 5218 articles (1963-2019) from a search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The professional committee made 14, 9, 5, and 11 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis, extra-pancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded the statements as valid after a two-round modified Delphi approach with individually rating these clinical statements, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. After evaluation by the moderators, the amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP has been proposed in 2020.

Clinical Usefulness of [18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Distinguishing Between Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) findings of pancreatic and extrapancreatic lesions in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic cancer (PC) and evaluated the usefulness of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for differentiating between AIP and PC.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients, 19 with AIP and 66 with PC, who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT were studied retrospectively. We evaluated the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), patterns and distributions of FDG activity in pancreatic lesions, as well as FDG uptake in extrapancreatic lesions.

RESULTS

The levels of SUVmax of pancreatic lesions in PC patients were significantly higher than those in AIP patients (P < 0.05). Focal/segmental distribution of FDG activity was found in 61.1% of the AIP patients and 98.4% of the PC patients. Heterogeneous FDG activity patterns were found in 61.1% of the AIP patients and 18.7% of the PC patients. Activities of FDG in pancreatic lesions were significantly different between AIP and PC. Extrapancreatic activities of salivary glands, extraperitoneal lymph nodes, prostate, retroperitoneum, and kidneys in the AIP patients were significantly higher than those in the PC patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that SUVmax (>7.08) and focal/segmental FDG distribution were independent predictors of PC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings are useful for differentiating between AIP and PC.

Improved clinical outcomes of tocilizumab versus cyclophosphamide for IgG4-related disease: insights from a prospective IgG4-related disease registry

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with active immunoglobulin G (IgG) 4 related disease (IgG4-RD) receiving tocilizumab versus those receiving cyclophosphamide (CYC).

Methods

This IgG4-RD registry study was a prospective cohort study conducted among patients with active IgG4-RD hospitalized at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Patients who were treated with tocilizumab or CYC along with glucocorticoids (GCs) were enrolled. All participants were followed up at the hospital clinic at 3 and 6 months after discharge. Primary clinical outcomes were measured via the IgG4-RD responder index (RI), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR), as well as side effects.

Results

From January 2015 to June 2020, 29 patients enrolled. Fourteen and 15 patients were treated with tocilizumab and CYC, respectively. At the 6-month follow-up, disease activity parameters including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), IgG4, and IgG4-RD RI, decreased significantly in both groups. At 6 months, tocilizumab demonstrated its superiority, with 50% of patients achieving CR in the Tocilizumab group versus 20% in the CYC group. However, no statistical significance was identified (p = 0.128). The GC dosage at 6 months was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group than in the CYC group [10 (9.4-15) mg/d versus 15 (15-15) mg/d, p = 0.025]. In the CYC group, two patients experienced lumbar vertebral compression fractures related to GCs. Other patients in both groups showed mild adverse effects.

Conclusions

Tocilizumab could be a better steroid-sparing agent, with a comparable curative effect and tolerance, than CYC, in the treatment of IgG4-RD.

Comparison of five-phase computed tomography images of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: Emphasis on cases with atypical images

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

International consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) include characteristic images of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP); however, reports on atypical cases are increasing. The aims of this study were to compare CT findings between AIP and pancreatic cancer (PC), and to analyze type 1 AIPs showing atypical images.

METHODS

Five-phase CT images were compared between 80 type 1-AIP lesions and 80 size- and location-matched PCs in the case-control study. Atypical AIPs were diagnosed based on the four ICDC items.

RESULTS

ICDC items were recognized in most AIP lesions; pancreatic enlargement (87.7%), narrowing of the main pancreatic duct (98.8%), delayed enhancement (100%), and no marked upstream-duct dilation (97.5%). CT values of AIPs increased rapidly until the pancreatic phase and decreased afterward, while those of PCs gradually increased until the delayed phase (P < 0.0001). Atypical images were recognized in 14.8% of AIPs, commonly without pancreatic enlargement (18.5 mm) and sometimes mimicking intraductal neoplasms. The CT values and their ratios were different between atypical AIPs and size-matched PCs most significantly in the pancreatic phase, but similar in the delayed phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Ordinary type 1 AIPs can be diagnosed with the ICDC, but atypical AIPs represented a small fraction. "Delayed enhancement" is characteristic to ordinary AIPs, however, "pancreatic-phase enhancement" is more diagnostic for atypical AIPs.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is histologically characterized by lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP). Recently, the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) for AIP has been reported. However, its role in the diagnostic flow of AIP is not fully elucidated. We retrospectively reviewed 53 consecutive patients who were suspected with AIP and underwent EUS-FNA/B. We evaluated the contribution of EUS-FNA/B to the diagnosis of AIP before considering response to steroid therapy among patients with diffuse enlargement of the pancreas and those with focal enlargement, respectively. Twenty-two patients showed diffuse pancreatic enlargement and 31 showed focal enlargement. The final diagnosis was definitive AIP in 32 patients, probable AIP in 2, possible AIP in 1, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis in 18. There was no change in diagnosis after EUS-FNA/B among patients with diffuse pancreatic enlargement, while diagnosis changed in 38.7% (12/31) among those with focal enlargement—there was a probable to definitive diagnosis in 4 patients, unspecified to definitive in 3, and unspecified to probable in 5. EUS-FNB provided a significantly higher sensitivity for typical pathological findings of LPSP than EUS-FNA, and 10 patients were diagnosed as pathologically definitive AIP by EUS-FNB, though none were by EUS-FNA (p = 0.002). EUS-FNA/B was useful in the diagnosis of focal type AIP, and steroid therapy could be introduced after the diagnosis was confirmed. Meanwhile, EUS-FNA/B provided no contribution to diagnosis of diffuse type AIP. EUS-FNB showed a higher diagnostic yield than FNA.

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.

Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis

The International Consensus Diagnosis Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been published internationally for the diagnosis of AIP. However, since the revisions in 2006 and 2011, the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis 2018 have been published. The criteria were revised based the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria 2011, and included descriptions of characteristic imaging findings such as (1) pancreatic enlargement and (2) distinctive narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. In addition, pancreatic duct images obtained by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as well as conventional endoscopic retrograde pancreatography were newly adopted. The guideline explains some characteristic imaging findings, but does not contain descriptions of the imaging methods, such as detailed imaging parameters and optimal timings of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. It is a matter of concern that imaging methods can vary from hospital to hospital. Although other characteristic findings have been reported, these findings were not described in the guideline. The present paper describes the imaging methods for obtaining optimal images and the characteristic imaging findings with the aim of standardizing image quality and improving diagnostic accuracy when radiologists diagnose AIP in actual clinical settings.

Insulin secretion improvement during steroid therapy for autoimmune pancreatitis according to the onset of diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is frequently complicated by diabetes mellitus (DM), but DM associated with AIP is reported to improve after steroid therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate glucose intolerance during steroid therapy according to the onset of DM.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients who underwent steroid therapy for AIP were included into this study. We evaluated C peptide index (CPI), homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-R), and the pancreatic diameter at AIP diagnosis and after 4 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years of steroid therapy. Patients were categorized into three groups according to DM onset: Pre-existing DM (pDM), concurrent DM (cDM), and non-DM (nDM).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (71%) had DM: 15 pDM and 28 cDM. At AIP diagnosis, CPI was lower in patients with pDM (0.7, P = 0.007) and cDM (0.9, P = 0.018) than nDM (1.3). After 4 weeks of steroid therapy, CPI improved in cDM (P < 0.001) and in nDM (P = 0.021). After 2 years of steroid therapy, HOMA-R increased (2.1-3.0, P = 0.007) but CPI gradually improved (1.0-2.1, P = 0.004). DM improved in 23% of cDM, and 55% of insulin users in cDM discontinued using insulin. Pancreatic atrophy was seen in 30%, and was associated with DM.

CONCLUSION

DM in patients with AIP was associated with impaired insulin secretion rather than insulin resistance. Insulin secretion improved during steroid therapy for AIP in patients with concurrent DM. Thus, glucose intolerance can be an indication for AIP treatment.

Steroid Therapy and Steroid Response in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a unique subtype of pancreatitis, is often accompanied by systemic inflammatory disorders. AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes on the basis of the histological subtype: immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2). Type 1 AIP is often accompanied by systemic lesions, biliary strictures, hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia and nephritis, dacryoadenitis, and sialadenitis. Type 2 AIP is associated with inflammatory bowel diseases in approximately 30% of cases. Standard therapy for AIP is oral corticosteroid administration. Steroid treatment is generally indicated for symptomatic cases and is exceptionally applied for cases with diagnostic difficulty (diagnostic steroid trial) after a negative workup for malignancy. More than 90% of patients respond to steroid treatment within 1 month, and most within 2 weeks. The steroid response can be confirmed on clinical images (computed tomography, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography). Hence, the steroid response is included as an optional diagnostic item of AIP. Steroid treatment results in normalization of serological markers, including IgG4. Short- and long-term corticosteroid treatment may induce adverse events, including chronic glycometabolism, obesity, an immunocompromised status against infection, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and myopathy. AIP is common in old age and is often associated with diabetes mellitus (33-78%). Thus, there is an argument for corticosteroid therapy in diabetes patients with no symptoms. With low-dose steroid treatment or treatment withdrawal, there is a high incidence of AIP recurrence (24-52%). Therefore, there is a need for long-term steroid maintenance therapy and/or steroid-sparing agents (immunomodulators and rituximab). Corticosteroids play a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of AIP.

Relative Rise of Serum IgG4 Levels After Steroid Therapy for Autoimmune Pancreatitis Predicts the Likelihood of Relapse

OBJECTIVES

Serum IgG4 level is a useful diagnostic marker of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP); however, it is difficult to predict relapse. We investigated whether a change in serum IgG4 is predictive of AIP relapse during maintenance therapy.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with AIP treated with steroids were divided into 3 groups according to their initial serum IgG4 levels: level 1 group (>2-fold upper limit), level 2 group (1- to 2-fold upper limit), and a normal group. The relapse rate and the prevalence of extrapancreatic lesions were compared between the 3 groups. The correlation between the relative rise of serum IgG4 levels and relapse during maintenance therapy was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in serum IgG4 levels in the presence or absence of relapse. The average number of extrapancreatic lesions was 1.02, 0.47, and 0.27 in level 1, level 2, and the normal group, respectively. The relative rise of serum IgG4 levels after steroid therapy was significantly higher in relapse than in nonrelapse cases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the relative rise of IgG4 levels for discriminating between the relapse and the nonrelapse cases was 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative rise of serum IgG4 levels after steroid therapy may provide an indication of relapse.

Current approach to the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease - Combination of comprehensive diagnostic and organ-specific criteria

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fascinating clinical entity proposed by Japanese investigators, and includes a wide variety of diseases, formerly diagnosed as Mikulicz's disease (MD), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), interstitial nephritis, prostatitis, retroperitoneal fibrosis, etc. Although all clinicians in every field of medicine may encounter this new disease, a unifying diagnostic criterion has not been established. In 2011, the Japanese IgG4 team, organized by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan, published comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD. Several problems with these criteria have arisen in clinical practice, however, including the difficulty obtaining biopsy samples from some patients, and the sensitivity and the specificity of techniques used to measure serum IgG4 concentrations. Although serum IgG4 concentration is an important clinical marker for IgG4-RD, its diagnostic utility in differentiating IgG4-RD from other diseases, called IgG4-RD mimickers, remains unclear. This review describes the current optimal approach for the diagnosis of IgG4-RD, based on both comprehensive and organ-specific diagnostic criteria, in patients with diseases such as IgG4-related pancreatitis (AIP), sclerosing cholangitis, and renal, lung and orbital diseases.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis in Children: Characteristic Features, Diagnosis, and Management

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an increasingly recognized disease entity, but data in children are limited. AIP presentation and outcome in children might differ from the adult experience. We aim to determine the characteristic features of AIP in children.

METHODS

Data about clinical symptoms, imaging, histology, and treatment were collected using two sources: (i) a systematic literature search and (ii) the INSPPIRE database, the largest international multicenter study of pancreatitis in children and the Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc (CUSL) registry.

RESULTS

We identified 48 AIP cases: 30 from literature review, 14 from INSPPIRE, and 4 from CUSL. The median age at diagnosis was 13 years (range 2-17 years). Abdominal pain (43/47, 91%) and/or obstructive jaundice (20/47, 42%) were the most common symptoms at diagnosis. Elevated serum IgG4 levels were only observed in 9/40 (22%) children. Cross-sectional imaging studies were abnormal in all children including hypointense global or focal gland enlargement (39/47, 83%), main pancreatic duct irregularity (30/47, 64%), and common bile duct stricture (26/47, 55%). A combination of lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, pancreatic fibrosis, and ductal granulocyte infiltration were the main histological findings (18/25, 72%). Children with AIP had a prompt clinical response to steroids. Complications of AIP included failure of exocrine (4/25, 16%) and endocrine (3/27, 11%) pancreas function.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric AIP has a distinct presentation with features similar to type 2 AIP in adults. This comprehensive report on the largest group of children with AIP to date is expected to help with the diagnosis and management of this disease and pave the way for future research studies.

Usefulness of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with partial maximum intensity projection for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with/without partial maximum intensity projection (MIP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional MRCP and ERCP images were retrospectively analyzed in 24 patients with AIP. We evaluated the narrowing length of the main pancreatic duct (NR-MPD), multiple skipped MPD narrowing (SK-MPD), and side branches arising from the narrowed portion of the MPD (SB-MPD) using four MRCP datasets: 5 original images (MIP₅), 10 original images (MIP₁₀), all original images (full-MIP), and a combination of these three datasets (a-MIP). The images were scored using a 3- or 5-point scale. The scores of the four MRCP datasets were statistically analyzed, and the positive rate of each finding was compared between MRCP and ERCP.

RESULTS

The median scores for SB-MPD on MIP₅ and a-MIP were significantly higher than those on MIP₁₀ and full-MIP. In other words, partial MIP is superior to full-MIP for visualization of detailed structures. The positive rate for SB-MPD on full-MIP was significantly lower than that on ERCP, whereas the positive rate on MIP₅, MIP₁₀, and a-MIP was not significantly different from that on ERCP. Moreover, the positive rate for NR-MPD and SK-MPD on the MRCP images was significantly higher than that on the ERCP images.

CONCLUSION

Partial MIP is useful for evaluating the MPD and is comparable with ERCP for diagnosing AIP.

Management of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions: A case-based survey

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL), including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN), harbor different malignant potential and the optimal management is often challenging. The present study aims to depict the compliance of experts with current consensus guidelines and the accuracy of treatment recommendations stratified by the medical specialty and hospital volume.

METHODS

An international survey was conducted using a set of 10 selected cases of PCL that were presented to a cohort of international experts on pancreatology. All presented cases were surgically resected between 2004 and 2015 and histopathological examination was available. Accuracy of the treatment recommendations was based on the European and international consensus guideline algorithms, and the histopathological result.

RESULTS

The response rate of the survey was 26% (46 of 177 contacted experts), consisting of 70% surgeons and 30% gastroenterologists/oncologists (GI/Onc). In the case of main-duct IPMN (MD-IPMN), surgeons preferred more often the surgical approach in comparison with the GI/Onc (55 versus 44%). The mean accuracy rate based on the European and international consensus guidelines, and the histopathological result, were 71/76/38% (surgeons), and 70/73/34% (GI/Onc), respectively. High-volume centers achieved insignificantly higher accuracy scores with regard to the histopathology. Small branch-duct IPMN with cysts <2 cm and malignant potential were not identified by the guideline algorithms.

CONCLUSION

The survey underlines the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with PCL; less than 40% of the recommendations were in line with the final histopathology in this selected case panel. Experts and consensus guidelines may fail to predict malignant potential in small PCL.

From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis which is autoimmune mediated. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) 2011 proposed two types of AIP: type I is associated with histological pattern of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), characterized by serum IgG4 elevation, whereas type 2 is named idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP), with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) negative. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear now; based on genetic factors, disease specific or related antigens, innate and adaptive immunity may be involved. The most common clinical manifestations of AIP are obstructive jaundice and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis can be made by a combination of parenchymal and ductal imaging, serum IgG4 concentrations, pancreatic histology, extrapancreatic disease, and glucocorticoid responsiveness according to ICDC 2011. Because of the clinical and imaging similarities with pancreatic cancer, general work-up should be done carefully to exclude pancreatic malignant tumor before empirical trial of glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid is the most common drug for AIP to induce remission, while there still exists controversy on steroid maintenance and treatment for relapse. Further studies should be done to identify more specific serum biomarkers for AIP, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the treatment for relapse.

Assessment of the Rate of Decrease in Serum IgG4 Level of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients in Response to Initial Steroid Therapy as a Predictor of Subsequent Relapse

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) responds well to steroid therapy but frequently relapses after discontinuing the steroid. It is difficult to know which cases are most likely to relapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the rate of decrease in serum IgG4 level after initial steroid therapy and a relapse.

METHODS

The subjects were 47 AIP patients who received steroid therapy. We calculated the difference between their serum IgG4 levels before and 2 months after the start of therapy, and their rate of decrease in serum IgG4 level after treatment (Δ') by dividing the difference between the 2 values by the number of days between them.

RESULTS

The rates of decrease were significantly higher in the nonrelapse groups than in the relapse groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve for the Δ' value was 0.781, and that at the Δ' cutoff value of 10.7, the sensitivity and the specificity of the Δ' value for discriminating between the 2 groups were 0.846 and 0.632, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the rate of decrease in serum IgG4 level may be a useful predictor of a relapse of AIP after steroid therapy.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis Can Transform Into Chronic Features Similar to Advanced Chronic Pancreatitis With Functional Insufficiency Following Severe Calcification

OBJECTIVES

Because several studies for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have revealed pancreatic calcification resembling that in chronic pancreatitis (CP), we sought to clarify whether AIP could transform into chronic features similar to advanced CP with severe pancreatic dysfunction.

METHODS

Pancreatic functions of 92 AIP patients, 47 definite CP patients, and 30 healthy controls were assessed by fecal elastase-1 concentration (FEC), fasting immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-R.

RESULTS

The 92 AIP patients included 17 (18%) with severe calcification (SC) and 75 without. The FEC levels in AIP and CP patients were significantly lower than that in controls. Exocrine insufficiency defined as FEC less than 200 μg/g was 39% in AIP without SC, 56% in AIP with SC, and 74% in CP. Fasting IRI and C-peptide reactivity values in CP were significantly lower than those in AIP, with no significant differences between AIP subgroups. The prevalence of endocrine insufficiency according to fasting IRI less than 5.0 μU/mL was 26% in AIP without SC, 31% in AIP with SC, and 59% in CP, respectively. HOMA-R values were significantly higher in all AIP groups than in CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune pancreatitis can transform into a state of pancreatic insufficiency after calcification that is less severe than that in definite CP.

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, distinct and increasingly recognized form of pancreatitis which has autoimmune features. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for AIP recently described two subtypes; type 1[lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP)] and type 2 [idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or AIP with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL)]. Type 1 is the more common form of the disease worldwide and current understanding suggests that it is a pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD). In contrast, type 2 AIP is a pancreas-specific disease not associated with IgG4 and mostly without the overt extra-pancreatic organ involvement seen in type 1. The pathogenesis of AIP is not completely understood and its clinical presentation is non-specific. It shares overlapping features with more sinister pathologies such as cancer of the pancreas, which continues to pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. The diagnostic criteria requires a variable combination of histopathological, imaging and serological features in the presence of typical extrapancreatic lesions and a predictable response to steroids.

Eotaxin-3 (CCL26) Expression in Human Pancreatic Myofibroblasts

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophil infiltration is a histological feature of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying eosinophilic infiltration. In this study, we aimed to investigate the expression of the eosinophil chemotactic protein, eotaxin-3, in human pancreatic myofibroblasts.

METHODS

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and quantitative polymerase chain reactions were used to quantify eotaxin-3 protein and messenger RNA levels, respectively.

RESULTS

Eotaxin-3 expression was induced by T helper type 2 cytokines, interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13, in time- and dose-dependent manners. Both IL-4 and IL-13 induced the rapid phosphorylation of STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6), and STAT6-specific small interfering RNA significantly blocked IL-4- and IL-13-induced eotaxin-3 expression, indicating involvement of STAT6 signaling pathways in eotaxin-3 induction. In contrast, SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signaling) protein-specific small interfering RNA experiments suggested that the SOCS family proteins are negative regulators of IL-4- and IL-13-induced eotaxin-3 expression in pancreatic myofibroblasts. Interferon-γ significantly inhibited IL-4- and IL-13-induced eotaxin-3 expression, and this response was mediated by STAT1 activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic myofibroblasts may be a cellular source of eotaxin-3 in the pancreas. The T helper type 2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, are critical factors for the induction of eotaxin-3 in the pancreas.

Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort

OBJECTIVES

The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) designed to diagnosis autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been proposed recently. The diagnostic performance of ICDC has not been previously evaluated in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP, respectively, in comparison with the revised HISORt and Asian criteria in Taiwan.

DESIGN

Prospective, consecutive patient cohort.

SETTING

Largest tertiary referred centre hospital managing pancreatic disease in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

188 patients with AIP and 130 with tissue proofed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were consecutively recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

The ICDC, as well as revised HISORt and Asian criteria, was applied for each participant. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP.

OUTCOMES

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in AIP and focal-type AIP.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for all AIP were the best: 89.4%, 100% and 93.7%, respectively, in these three criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for focal-type AIP (84.9%, 100% and 93.8%) were also the best among these three criteria. The area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic of ICDC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in all AIP and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) in focal-type AIP.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than the revised HISORt and Asian criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each criterion are higher in diffuse-type AIP compared with focal-type AIP. Under the same specificity, the sensitivity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than other diagnostic criteria in focal-type AIP. ICDC has better diagnostic performance compared with previously proposed diagnostic criteria in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP.