Biochemical responses to bezafibrate improve long-term outcome in asymptomatic patients with primary biliary cirrhosis refractory to UDCA

Selected Aspects of the Intricate Background of Immune-Related Cholangiopathies-A Critical Overview

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are rare immune-related cholangiopathies with still poorly explained pathogenesis. Although triggers of chronic inflammation with subsequent fibrosis that affect cholangiocytes leading to obliteration of bile ducts and conversion to liver cirrhosis are unclear, both disorders are regarded to be multifactorial. Different factors can contribute to the development of hepatocellular injury in the course of progressive cholestasis, including (1) body accumulation of bile acids and their toxicity, (2) decreased food intake and nutrient absorption, (3) gut microbiota transformation, and (4) reorganized host metabolism. Growing evidence suggests that intestinal microbiome composition not only can be altered by liver dysfunction, but in turn, it actively impacts hepatic conditions. In this review, we highlight the role of key factors such as the gut-liver axis, intestinal barrier integrity, bile acid synthesis and circulation, and microbiome composition, which seem to be strongly related to PBC and PSC outcome. Emerging treatments and future therapeutic strategies are also presented.

Acute coronary syndrome after liver transplantation in a young primary biliary cholangitis recipient with dyslipidemia: a case report

Background

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive liver disease associated with dyslipidemia. There is a consensus that PBC does not accelerate coronary artery disease despite high cholesterol levels, so the screening test for the coronary artery is not routinely performed before liver transplantation (LT). To date, no report has described the potential risk of PBC-related dyslipidemia for developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after LT.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old Asian female with a known history of PBC underwent ABO-incompatible living-donor LT, with her husband as the donor. Although she had high cholesterol and triglyceride levels that were refractory to medications, she passed all routine preoperative examinations, including cardiopulmonary function tests and infection screenings. One week after LT, she developed ACS with 90% stenosis of both the left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery. Emergent stent implantation was successfully performed followed by dual antiplatelet therapy. The long history of PBC and associated severe dyslipidemia for 10 years would have accelerated the atherosclerosis, causing latent stenosis in the coronary artery. Inapparent stenosis might have become apparent due to unstable hemodynamics during the acute phase after LT.

Conclusions

PBC-related dyslipidemia potentially brings a risk for developing ACS after LT. This experience suggests that the preoperative evaluation of the coronary artery should be considered for high-risk patients, especially those who have drug-resistant dyslipidemia.

The Inconvenient Truth of Primary Biliary Cholangitis/Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndrome

The term 'PBC/AIH-overlap' has been applied when features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), be they biochemical, serological or histological, coexist with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), either at first presentation or sequentially during disease course. Several treatment paradigms have been proposed, extrapolated from those of the primary conditions. However, there are no randomised studies showing improved survival with combination therapy compared to bile acid monotherapy. In the absence of high-quality evidence, multidisciplinary patient-specific approaches must be used to individualise treatment pathways, with appreciation that disease phenotypes are not always static, differ in treatment responses, and have the potential to evolve over time.

Evaluation and Management of Pruritus in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Chronic pruritus is a classic symptom in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. It affects up to two-thirds of patients in the course of the disease. Efficient therapy consists of topical treatment combined with systemic options such as anion exchangers, rifampicin, bezafibrate, μ-opioid receptor antagonists, selective-serotonin receptor uptake inhibitors, and gabapentinoids. Future therapeutic approaches may contain the selective blockade of the enterohepatic cycle by inhibiting the ileal bile acid transporter, the agonism at κ-opioid receptors, and antagonism of the mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X4. As nondrug treatment, ultraviolet B therapy, albumin dialysis, and biliary drainage are available at specialized centers.

PPARα: A potential therapeutic target of cholestasis

The accumulation of bile acids in the liver leads to the development of cholestasis and hepatocyte injury. Nuclear receptors control the synthesis and transport of bile acids in the liver. Among them, the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is the most common receptor studied in treating cholestasis. The activation of this receptor can reduce the amount of bile acid synthesis and decrease the bile acid content in the liver, alleviating cholestasis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA) have a FXR excitatory effect, but the unresponsiveness of some patients and the side effect of pruritus seriously affect the results of UDCA or OCA treatment. The activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) has emerged as a new target for controlling the synthesis and transport of bile acids during cholestasis. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory effect of PPARα can effectively reduce cholestatic liver injury, thereby improving patients’ physiological status. Here, we will focus on the function of PPARα and its involvement in the regulation of bile acid transport and metabolism. In addition, the anti-inflammatory effects of PPARα will be discussed in some detail. Finally, we will discuss the application of PPARα agonists for cholestatic liver disorders.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Regulate Hepatic Immunity and Assist in the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Fibrates, which are agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, have received increasing attention in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Reduced alkaline phosphatase levels and improved clinical outcomes were observed in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy4 when treated with bezafibrate or fenofibrate combined with UDCA. In contrast to obeticholic acid, which exacerbates pruritus in patients, fibrates have been shown to relieve pruritus. Clinical trial outcomes show potential for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis by targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. It is currently agreed that primary biliary cholangitis is an autoimmune-mediated cholestatic liver disease, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor is a nuclear receptor that regulates the functions of multiple immune cells, thus playing an important role in regulating innate and adaptive immunity. Therefore, this review focuses on the immune disorder of primary biliary cholangitis and summarizes the regulation of hepatic immunity when peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are targeted for treating primary biliary cholangitis.

Bezafibrate therapy in primary biliary cholangitis refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid: a longitudinal study of paired liver biopsies at 5 years of follow up

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, nearly 40% of patients have an incomplete response to UDCA. The addition of bezafibrate has shown biochemical benefit in this group of patients.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term effects of UDCA in combination with bezafibrate on histological outcomes in patients with UDCA-refractory PBC.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients refractory to UDCA were included. Clinical parameters were monitored and paired liver biopsy (PLB) was performed after 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort, 49 subjects were analysed and 31 had PLB at 5 years. Values for serum ALP, AST, ALT and GGT significantly improved with UDCA-bezafibrate. This beneficial effect was observed at 12 months where 86% achieved ALP at normal levels. Analyses of PLB showed a significant decrease in liver damage as reflected by Ludwig (baseline 2.29 ± 1.2, to 1.84 ± 1 at year 5, P = 0.0242) and Ishak (baseline 6.19 ± 2.2 to 4.77 ± 2.2 at year 5, P = 0.0008) scores. Overall, regression of fibrosis was attained in 48% of patients. Furthermore, we observed a significant reduction in the proportion with cirrhosis from 19% at baseline to 3% at 5 years (P < 0.001). These beneficial effects were associated with better predictive risk scores using the GLOBE and UK-PBC prognosis models.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding bezafibrate to UDCA in patients with UDCA-refractory PBC showed a significant decrease in fibrosis and inflammatory histological scores at 5 years. These beneficial effects warrant further evaluation in long-term cohort studies and controlled trials.

Predictors for incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. Data from a national registry of liver disease

Background

The current standard of treatment in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), although a considerable proportion of patients show incomplete response resulting in disease progression.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of incomplete response to UDCA and determine associated patients' characteristics.

Methods

Patients with PBC as main diagnosis were included from a national multicentric patient registry—Liver.pt. Main endpoints included incomplete response to UDCA treatment according to Barcelona, Paris I and Paris II criteria, Globe and UK PBC scores and the association between baseline characteristics and incomplete response according to Paris II criteria.

Results

A total of 434 PBC patients were identified, with a mean age of 55 years and 89.2% females. Nearly half of patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 93.2% had positive anti‐mitochondrial antibodies. Almost all patients (95.6%) had been prescribed at least one drug for PBC treatment. At the last follow‐up visit, 93.3% were under treatment of which 99.8% received UDCA. Incomplete response to UDCA was observed in 30.7%, 35.3%, 53.7% and 36.4% of patients according to Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II criteria and Globe score, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, and accordingly to Paris II criteria, the risk for incomplete biochemical response was 25% higher for patients with cirrhosis at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.02–1.54; p = 0.033) and 35% (95%CI:1.06–1.72; p = 0.016) and 5% (OR = 1.05; 95%CI:1.01–1.10; p = 0.013) for those with elevated gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

Conclusion

A considerable proportion of patients showed incomplete biochemical response to UDCA treatment according to Paris II criteria. Cirrhosis, elevated GGT and ALP at diagnosis were identified as associated risk factors for incomplete response. Early identification of patients at risk of incomplete response could improve treatment care and guide clinical decision to a more careful patient monitorization.

Summarise the established knowledge on this subject

Primary biliary cholangitis is a liver disease that can progress to end‐stage liver disease, with premature death or need for liver transplantation.

Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) significantly increases liver transplant‐free survival. However, incomplete response to UDCA reduces this beneficial effect.

What are the significant and/or new findings of this study?

By evaluating prevalence and risk factors for UDCA incomplete response through a large multicentric national registry it was found that 53.7% of patients were incomplete responders, according to Paris II criteria, with cirrhosis, elevated gamma‐glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase at diagnosis as the main risk factors.

These findings suggest that patients diagnosed at an advanced stage should be closely monitored and might benefit from novel therapies to improve outcomes if incomplete response is present.

Safety of fibrates in cholestatic liver diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Off-label use of fibrates in patients with cholestatic liver diseases results in improved biochemical parameters and pruritus; however, their safety in this population has been a concern. This study summarizes safety data for fibrates when used for treatment of cholestatic liver diseases.

METHODS

A systematic review of published studies evaluating the use of fibrates for treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was performed. Electronic databases were searched up to December 2019 for published studies evaluating treatment outcomes associated to fibrates for these 2 diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies were identified, including 31 for PBC and 6 for PSC, with a total of 1107 unique patients treated with fibrates ± ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Most studies evaluated fenofibrate and bezafibrate, and only 1 study evaluated pemafibrate. There were no studies evaluating gemfibrozil or clofibrate. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal. Elevations of aminotransferases and serum creatinine were reported more commonly in patients treated with UDCA plus fibrates versus UDCA monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrates appear to be safe and well tolerated in patients with PBC, with a low frequency of AEs. There are scarce data about the safety of these agents for treatment of PSC.

Changes in disease characteristics of primary biliary cholangitis: An observational retrospective study from 1982 to 2016

AIM

Disease characteristics of primary biliary cholangitis have changed recently. However, detailed studies on the subject have been limited. Therefore, we aimed to clarify disease characteristics of patients with recent primary biliary cholangitis using the cohort from Niigata University and 21 affiliated hospitals.

METHODS

Overall, 508 patients were enrolled in this study from 1982 to 2016, divided into three cohorts according to their year of diagnosis: ≤1999, 2000-2009 and ≥2010. We compared differences in clinical characteristics, response to ursodeoxycholic acid and prognosis.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio increased incrementally from 1:16.4 (≤1999) to 1:3.8 (≥2010) (P < 0.001). In women, the median age at diagnosis increased incrementally from 54.0 years (≤1999) to 60.5 years (≥2010) (P < 0.001) and serum albumin decreased gradually (P = 0.001), which might have affected the increase in the Fibrosis-4 Index and albumin-bilirubin score. The ursodeoxycholic acid response rate according to the Barcelona criteria increased incrementally from 26.7% (≤1999) to 78.4% (≥2010) (P < 0.010), and those according to other criteria (Paris-I, Rotterdam and Toronto) were approximately ≥80% in all cohorts. Ten-year survival rate in the ≤1999 and 2000-2009 cohorts were 98.6% and 95.6%, respectively. These earlier cohorts were also characterized by a higher rate of asymptomatic state and mild histology (83.5% [≤1999] and 84.7% [2000-2009], and 93.6% [≤1999] and 91.1% [2000-2009]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis were characterized by older age at diagnosis and an increase in male to female ratio as well as higher response rates of ursodeoxycholic acid and longer survival, resulting from the early recognition of primary biliary cholangitis.

The ursodeoxycholic acid response score predicts pathological features in primary biliary cholangitis

AIM

The ursodeoxycholic acid response score (URS) can predict the biochemical response to 12 months of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). We investigated the relationship between the URS and the histopathological features before and after UDCA treatment.

METHODS

Patients with PBC (n = 126) were examined for the association between the probability of response (POR) to UDCA based on the URS formulas and clinicopathological features. Furthermore, 30 patients were examined for the association between the POR and pathological changes.

RESULTS

The POR area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting the biochemical response to UDCA was 0.861. The PORs of stage 1 in the Nakanuma system and grade 0 in the CK7 grading in hepatocytes were significantly higher than those of stage 3 and grade 3, respectively. The AUROCs for the prediction of stage ≥2, stage ≥3 and stage 4 in the Nakanuma system at pretreatment were 0.592, 0.710 and 0.817, respectively. The AUROCs for the prediction of grade ≥1, grade ≥2 and grade 3 in the CK7 hepatocyte grading were 0.741, 0.824 and 0.970, respectively. Furthermore, the AUROC for predicting the histological stage progression after UDCA treatment in the Scheuer classification and the Nakanuma system were 0.712 and 0.799, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The URS not only predicts the biochemical response, but also reflects the Nakanuma system and the CK7 hepatocyte grading at pretreatment. This scoring system can identify an inadequate histological response to UDCA treatment in the Scheuer classification and the Nakanuma system.

IgM response is a prognostic biomarker of primary biliary cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients who are refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are at risk for progression to cirrhosis and liver failure. Bezafibrate could be an alternative second-line therapeutic option in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome(s) of combined UDCA and bezafibrate therapy in UDCA-refractory PBC patients and identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

Among 445 patients treated with UDCA, 150 patients inadequately responded to UDCA monotherapy and received long-term UDCA plus bezafibrate (median, 15 years). Data from these patients were used for this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Combination therapy resulted in significant improvements in serum biochemistry and liver transplantation risk estimated using the UK-PBC-risk and the GLOBE scores. The cumulative normalization rates of alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and immunoglobulin M (IgM) were significantly higher in patients without cirrhosis-related symptoms or liver-related events than in those with them. Overall, IgM constantly emerged as a significant factor associated with cirrhosis-related symptoms and liver-related events at all time points. Cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in patients with IgM ≥ 240 mg/dL than in patients with IgM < 240 mg/dL. Thus, normalization of IgM levels was a good surrogate predictor of long-term prognosis. None of the patients discontinued combination therapy due to any adverse events during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings point to the beneficial effects of long-term UDCA plus bezafibrate combination therapy for UDCA-refractory PBC patients, and IgM response can be a useful predictive biomarker of long-term clinical outcomes.

Bezafibrate Improves GLOBE and UK-PBC Scores and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

In Japan, bezafibrate (BF) is a second-line agent for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) that is refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. From a retrospective cohort (n = 873) from the Japan PBC Study Group, we enrolled 118 patients who had received UDCA monotherapy for at least 1 year followed by combination therapy with UDCA+BF for at least 1 year. GLOBE and UK-PBC scores after UDCA monotherapy (i.e., immediately before UDCA+BF combination therapy) were compared with those after 1 year of UDCA+BF combination therapy. The real outcomes of enrolled patients estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were compared with the predicted outcomes calculated using GLOBE and UK-PBC scores. In addition, the hazard ratio of BF treatment was calculated using propensity score analysis. The mean GLOBE score before the combination therapy was 0.504 ± 0.080, which improved significantly to 0.115 ± 0.085 (P < 0.0001) after 1 year of combination therapy. The real liver transplant-free survival of enrolled patients was significantly better than that predicted by GLOBE score before introducing BF. Combination therapy did not significantly improve the real rates of liver transplantation or liver-related death compared with those predicted by UK-PBC risk score before introducing BF, but the predicted risk was significantly reduced by the addition of BF (P < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting showed that the addition of BF significantly reduced the hazard of liver transplant or liver-related death in patients who, after 1 year of UDCA monotherapy, had normal serum bilirubin (adjusted hazard ratio 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.60, P = 0.013). Conclusion: Addition of BF to UDCA monotherapy improves not only GLOBE and UK-PBC scores but also the long-term prognosis of PBC patients, especially those with early-stage PBC.

Review of pharmacotherapeutic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this review was to evaluate pharmacotherapeutic treatments for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) through a literature search of current published data. A review of the current clinical data for each treatment is discussed.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for articles using EMBASE (1980 to April 1, 2018), and MEDLINE (1948 to April 1, 2018) using Ovid, to identify studies investigating various therapies in PSC. Search terms included the following: primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholangitis, sclerosing cholangitis; ursodeoxycholic acid, glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, methotrexate, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, penicillamine, anti-TNF, antibiotics, and probiotics. We also performed a review of current clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov. We considered for review relevant studies published in English, pilot studies, and randomized controlled trials involving human subjects.

RESULTS

Therapies that have been investigated in the management of PSC include those used in search terms and others that were not included in our search parameters. Analysis of published data involving each therapy was explored and none have shown any sustained, significant benefit in the treatment of PSC. In terms of relevance to patient care and clinical practice, this review evaluates and compares various pharmacotherapeutic treatments for PSC where liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, no clinical study of any drug has demonstrated effectiveness in terms of survival benefit or a decreased need for liver transplantation. More clinical studies are needed, and patients need to be adequately informed before any medical therapy for PSC is undertaken.

New treatments/targets for primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune, cholestatic, chronic liver disease that ultimately progresses towards cirrhosis and liver failure if untreated. While ursodeoxycholic acid has been established as standard of care for PBC in the last few decades, significant advances in second-line treatment options have recently been made and new therapeutic developments are currently under evaluation. The purpose of this article is to provide the clinician with an overview of the current treatment options and future opportunities for patients with PBC.

Emerging novel treatments for autoimmune liver diseases

The etiology of autoimmune liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), still remains largely unknown and no therapeutic agents that are able to "cure" these diseases have been developed. Although corticosteroids for AIH and ursodeoxycholic acid for PBC have been shown to significantly improve liver transplantation (LT)-free survival and are recommended as first-line drugs, treatment strategies for patients who show incomplete response to these drugs have not yet been fully established. No drug is significantly associated with long LT-free survival in PSC patients. Nevertheless, with progress in genetics, immunology, and cellular biology, several new compounds or antibodies are expected to have an effect on autoimmune liver diseases and several drugs are under consideration for clinical use. Although most clinical trials have been carried out in the USA or Europe, some are, or will be, undertaken in Japan in the future. In this review, the current standard-of-care of autoimmune liver diseases will be summarized, together with emerging novel treatments relevant to clinical practice in Japan.

Symptoms and health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Although patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) experience a variety of symptoms that could impair health-related quality of life (HRQOL), no studies regarding symptoms and impact of PBC on HRQOL have been performed in Asian countries. Herein, we aimed to evaluate symptoms and HRQOL in Japanese PBC patients. We performed a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study. The PBC-40 and the short form (SF)-36 were used as measures of symptoms and HRQOL. Four-hundred-ninety-six patients with PBC were enrolled. In the PBC-40, the average score was highest in the emotional domain, followed by the fatigue domain. The HRQOL measured using SF-36 was also impaired, especially in the physical and role-social components. After adjustments of variables, female sex, younger age at diagnosis, and lower serum albumin level were independently associated with fatigue scores, while a longer follow-up period and lower serum albumin levels were associated with itch scores.

Increased expression and altered localization of cathepsin Z are associated with progression to jaundice stage in primary biliary cholangitis

Our recent genome-wide association study found that the NELFCD/CTSZ locus was significantly associated with progression of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) to jaundice stage in the Japanese population. In this study, we investigated the role of cathepsin Z in the etiology and pathology of PBC. Serum cathepsin Z levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The expression and localization of cathepsin Z in liver specimens were analyzed by western blotting and immunohistochemistry. In PBC patients, serum cathepsin Z levels were significantly increased with disease progression. In addition, its levels were positively correlated with alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase and total bilirubin, and were negatively correlated with platelet count and albumin. Cathepsin Z expression was markedly increased in hepatocytes at later stages of PBC, and its localization was altered from the peri-bile canaliculus to the cytoplasm, where a fraction was no longer colocalized with endosomal/lysosomal vesicles. Similar altered expression of cathepsin Z was observed in end-stage of other cholestatic liver diseases including sepsis, obstructive jaundice, and Alagille syndrome. Our results indicate that altered expression and localization of cathepsin Z in hepatocytes are characteristic features of PBC and other cholestatic liver diseases, and are implicated in the progression of PBC.

Effect of deferred or no treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with early primary biliary cholangitis

AIM

As primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a heterogeneous disease, we hypothesized that there is a population of patients with early PBC who do not require prompt treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). In this study, we analyzed data from a large-scale PBC cohort in Japan, and retrospectively investigated whether outcomes of early PBC patients were affected with prompt or deferred/no UDCA treatment.

METHODS

We defined early PBC as asymptomatic, serum alkaline phosphatase <1.67-fold the upper limit of normal, normal bilirubin, and histological stages I-II at presentation. We compared the outcomes of early PBC patients between the treatment regimens; prompt treatment group (UDCA was initiated within 1 year after diagnosis) and deferred/no treatment group (UDCA initiated >1 year after diagnosis or never initiated). Furthermore, we examined the outcomes of early PBC patients alternatively defined only with symptomatology and biochemistry.

RESULTS

We identified 562 early PBC patients (prompt: n = 509; deferred/no treatment: n = 53). Incidence rates (per 1000 patient-years) for liver-related mortality or liver transplantation and decompensating events were 0.5 and 5.4, respectively, in the prompt treatment group, and 0 and 8.7, respectively, in the deferred/no treatment group. Multivariate analyses showed that age and bilirubin were significantly associated with developing decompensating events, whereas the prompt and deferred/no treatments were not. We obtained similar results in early PBC patients defined without histological examination.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that deferred/no treatment for early PBC patients did not affect the outcomes. This study provides a rationale for a future prospective, randomized study.

NELFCD and CTSZ loci are associated with jaundice-stage progression in primary biliary cholangitis in the Japanese population

Approximately 10–20% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) progress to jaundice stage regardless of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and bezafibrate. In this study, we performed a GWAS and a replication study to identify genetic variants associated with jaundice-stage progression in PBC using a total of 1,375 patients (1,202 early-stage and 173 jaundice-stage) in a Japanese population. SNP rs13720, which is located in the 3′UTR of cathepsin Z (CTSZ), showed the strongest association (odds ratio [OR] = 2.15, P = 7.62 × 10⁻⁷) with progression to jaundice stage in GWAS. High-density association mapping at the CTSZ and negative elongation factor complex member C/D (NELFCD) loci, which are located within a strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) block, revealed that an intronic SNP of CTSZ, rs163800, was significantly associated with jaundice-stage progression (OR = 2.16, P = 8.57 × 10⁻⁸). In addition, eQTL analysis and in silico functional analysis indicated that genotypes of rs163800 or variants in strong LD with rs163800 influence expression levels of both NELFCD and CTSZ mRNA. The present novel findings will contribute to dissect the mechanism of PBC progression and also to facilitate the development of therapies for PBC patients who are resistant to current therapies.

Treatment of primary biliary cholangitis ursodeoxycholic acid non-responders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by an immune mediated destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the primary medication for the treatment of PBC, resulting in improved liver tests, resolution of symptoms and increased transplant free survival. However, not all patients respond to UDCA. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an evidence based assessment of the medications that have been studied in patients who are refractory to UDCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews of the published literature. A total of 23 articles fulfilling our inclusion criteria were found.

RESULTS

Several studies have shown an improvement in liver biochemistries with the use of obeticholic acid in conjunction with UDCA. Fibrates, including fenofibrate and bezafibrate, have evidence supporting benefit in this population but need more robust studies to confirm these observational results. Neither obeticholic acid nor fibrates have shown to increase transplant free survival. While there may be some benefit with methotrexate, colchicine, budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine, these findings were not consistent and the benefits were marginal. Further investigation is needed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with PBC refractory to UDCA, obeticholic acid or a fibrate is a reasonable choice as an adjunctive treatment to UDCA. Further investigation with randomized controlled trials is needed to provide high quality evidence to formulate standardized therapies in this difficult to treat population.

Factors predictive of the efficacy of bezafibrate therapy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

AIM

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare cholestatic disease. We previously reported the effects of bezafibrate on elevated hepatobiliary enzyme levels in patients with this disease both retrospectively and prospectively. In this study, we assessed factors predictive of bezafibrate efficacy.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with PSC, who underwent bezafibrate therapy (400 mg per day) from November 2006 to June 2015, were evaluated. Treatment was judged as being effective if the levels of all of the hepatobiliary enzymes decreased after 12 weeks. We investigated the patients' characteristics, disease history, concomitant medications, liver function, and liver stiffness.

RESULTS

The efficacy rate of bezafibrate was 60% (15/25 patients). The efficacy rate in patients graded as Child-Pugh class A was significantly higher (75% [15/20]) than that in patients graded as class B (0% [0/5], P < 0.01). Non-responders had higher liver stiffness values (18.0 vs. 8.8 kPa, P = 0.19), and concomitantly used ursodeoxycholic acid more frequently (100% vs. 73%, P = 0.12) than responders.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not elucidate the factors predictive for bezafibrate efficacy for the treatment of PSC. However, bezafibrate was more effective for patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A) when it was prescribed before progression of liver fibrosis and failure of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, which when untreated will culminate in end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Diagnosis is usually based on the presence of serum liver tests indicative of a cholestatic hepatitis in association with circulating antimitochondrial antibodies. Patient presentation and course can be diverse and risk stratification is important to ensure all patients receive a personalised approach to their care. The goals of treatment and management are the prevention of end-stage liver disease, and the amelioration of associated symptoms. Pharmacologic approaches in practice, to reduce the impact of the progressive nature of disease, currently include licensed therapies (ursodeoxycholic acid and obeticholic acid) and off-label therapies (fibric acid derivatives, budesonide). These clinical practice guidelines summarise the evidence for the importance of a structured, life-long and individualised, approach to the care of patients with PBC, providing a framework to help clinicians diagnose and effectively manage patients.

Old and new treatments for primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly primary biliary cirrhosis) is a rare progressive cholestatic liver disease, whose hallmark features include a persistently elevated alkaline phosphatase level, presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies and characteristic histology. Since 1998, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a bile acid, has been the only available therapeutic agent. Primary biliary cholangitis is associated with the development of end-stage liver disease, increased morbidity and mortality. UDCA has been shown to improve serum biochemistries, histology and delay the need for liver transplantation. The clinical issue is that approximately 25%-40% of patients do not respond to this standard therapy. In recent years, many trials have investigated alternative and adjunctive treatments, leading to the recent approval of obeticholic acid, an analogue of chenodeoxycholic acid, which has shown significant and sustained reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels in combination with UDCA. Obeticholic acid has rapidly been embraced as a new agent to improve the biochemical profile in refractory patients, in addition to being approved for use as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate UDCA. There are several other studies and targets which are being investigated. This review is intended to highlight the benefits of UDCA, educate the reader on the newly available obeticholic acid, and to summarize the many ongoing trials and therapeutic targets being investigated in attempts to control and cure primary biliary cholangitis.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly referred to as primary biliary cirrhosis, is an infrequent progressive intrahepatic cholestatic autoimmune illness that can evolve into hepatic fibrosis, hepatic cirrhosis, hepatic failure, and, in some cases, hepatocellular carcinoma. The disease itself is characterized by T-lymphocyte-mediated chronic non-suppurative destructive cholangitis and elevated serum levels of extremely specific anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies (AMAs). In this article, we will not only review epidemiology, risk factors, natural history, predictive scores, radiologic approaches (e.g., acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, vibration controlled transient elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography), clinical features, serological characteristics covering biochemical markers, immunoglobulins, infections markers, biomarkers, predictive fibrosis marker, specific antibodies (including AMAs such as AMA-M2), anti-nuclear autoantibodies [such as anti-multiple nuclear dot autoantibodies (anti-sp100, PML, NDP52, anti-sp140), anti-rim-like/membranous anti-nuclear autoantibodies (anti-gp210, anti-p62), anti-centromere autoantibodies, and some of the novel autoantibodies], histopathological characteristics of PBC, diagnostic advances, and anti-diastole of PBC. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the recent advances in research of PBC in terms of therapies, including ursodeoxycholic acid, budesonide, methotrexate, obeticholic acid, cyclosporine A, fibrates such as bezafibrate and fenofibrate, rituximab, mesenchymal stem cells transplant, and hepatic transplant. Currently, hepatic transplant remains the only optimal choice with acknowledged treatment efficiency for end-stage PBC patients.

Identification of microRNA profiles associated with refractory primary biliary cirrhosis

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous, non-coding RNAs that control the target gene translation by RNA interference; miRNAs are associated with cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cell survival. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of unknown etiology. One third of patients with PBC demonstrate suboptimal responses, which result in worse outcomes. It has been previously reported that miRNAs are involved in drug resistance, however, the association between miRNA expression levels and refractory PBC remains to be fully elucidated. In the present study, among the 20 patients with PBC treated with ursodeoxycholic acid or bezafibrate, 15 patients were classed as treatment‑effective, and 5 were classed as being treatment‑resistant. Using the miRNA array technique, miRNA profiles were identified for each group. A total of 35 miRNAs were significantly upregulated, and 23 were significantly downregulated in the treatment‑resistant group compared with the treatment‑effective group. In order to examine the association between the highly altered miRNAs and clinical features of the two groups, numerous parameters were analyzed. Elevated levels of direct bilirubin, aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT) were identified to be associated with miRNA‑122 upregulation. AST, ALT, and γ guanosine triphosphate were additionally associated with miRNA‑378f upregulation. However, the reduction of miRNA‑4311 was associated with reduced levels of AST and ALT. miRNA‑4714‑3p was also negatively correlated with total bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase. Therefore, identifying the miRNA profile was demonstrated to be a useful approach in the characterization of PBC development. It is suggested that highly altered miRNAs may be potential biomarkers for use in the development of treatment of patients with refractory PBC.

It is time to change primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC): New nomenclature from "cirrhosis" to "cholangitis", and upcoming treatment based on unveiling pathology

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic, organ-specific, autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive cholestasis, eventually leading to cirrhosis. Several lines of evidence have revealed a crucial role of adaptive as well as innate immune responses in the etiopathogenesis of PBC, and more recently, the biology of bile duct cells and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) demonstrated several key molecules and pathways in this enigmatic disease. Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the only approved drug for PBC with clinical evidences for improvement of long-term outcomes, a substantial population have suboptimal responses to UDCA, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. In this regard, second-line treatment for patients refractory to UDCA is strongly awaited. In Japan, bezafibrate (BF) has been frequently used for this purpose, yet recent clinical trials failed to clearly demonstrate clinical efficacy of BF. Novel pharmacotherapies targeted to key molecules and pathways in PBC are upcoming. Finally, we sincerely call on all members of the Japan Society of Hepatology to use from this moment on the name "primary biliary cholangitis" for the disease known by its abbreviation PBC, in keeping with a very recent global agreement.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but not all cases respond well. Evidence has shown that combination therapy of UDCA with bezafibrate significantly improved liver function. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of UDCA and bezafibrate combination therapy in the treatment of PBC.

RESULTS

Nine trials, with a total of 269 patients, were included in the analysis. The bias risk of these trials was high. Compared with UDCA alone, the combination with bezafibrate improved the Mayo risk score (mean difference [MD], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.95; P=0.0008) and liver biochemistry: alkaline phosphatase (MD, -238.21 IU/L; 95% CI, -280.83 to -195.60; P<0.00001); gamma-glutamyltransferase (MD, -38.23 IU/L; 95% CI, -50.16 to -25.85; P<0.00001); immunoglobulin M (MD, -128.63 IU/L; 95% CI, -151.55 to -105.71; P<0.00001); bilirubin (MD, -0.20 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.07; P=0.002); triglycerides (MD, -26.84 mg/dL; 95% CI, -36.51 to -17.17; P<0.0001); total cholesterol (MD, -21.58 mg/dL; 95% CI, -30.81 to -12.34; P<0.0001), and serum alanine aminotransferase (MD, -10.24 IU/L; 95% CI, -12.65 to -78.5; P<0.00001). However, combination therapy showed no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality or pruritus, and may have resulted in more adverse events (risk ratio [RR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.67; P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy improved liver biochemistry and the prognosis of PBC, but did not improve clinical symptoms or incidence of death. Attention should be paid to adverse events when using bezafibrate.

Prospective study of bezafibrate for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease. Medical treatments must be devised to avoid or postpone liver transplantation in PSC patients. No clinical trial has prospectively explored the efficacy of bezafibrate in PSC patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of 12-week bezafibrate treatment, with pre- and post-treatment observation periods, in PSC patients. Bezafibrate was prescribed at 200 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint was defined as improvements in liver function test (LFT) data after bezafibrate treatment. Changes in LFT data during the study period were assessed every 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled as planned, and 11 completed the study protocol. Biliary enzyme levels improved in all patients after bezafibrate treatment for 12 weeks. Hepatic enzyme levels improved in only seven of the 11 patients, and the efficacy of bezafibrate in PSC patients was thus 64%. LFT data (alkaline phosphatase and alanine aminotransferase levels) were reduced after bezafibrate treatment (both P < 0.05 by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test), and both significantly increased after bezafibrate cessation (both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bezafibrate effectively improved LFT data in 64% of PSC patients. This is the first prospective clinical trial to evaluate the effect of bezafibrate in PSC patients.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: safety and benefits of established and emerging therapies

INTRODUCTION

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic liver disease characterized histologically by lymphocytic cholangitis and intralobular bile duct destruction. It is a progressive disorder associated with increased mortality and decreased quality of life related to hepatic fibrosis, troublesome symptoms such as fatigue and pruritus, and ultimately endstage cirrhosis. PBC affects adults around the world, and therefore effective treatment of PBC and its associated symptoms constitute significant issues for patients and providers as well as on a public health level. The only approved pharmacotherapy for PBC to date is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a choleretic, hydrophilic bile acid which has been in clinical use for decades. UDCA is effective in a majority of patients with PBC, but nearly a third of patients are UDCA non-responders. Non-response to UDCA is associated with an increased risk of death or need for liver transplantation (LT). Whereas LT is an effective treatment, it engenders substantial cost and a risk of PBC recurrence, among other complications. Patients who are non-responders to UDCA or have highly symptomatic disease (e.g., intractable pruritus) are thus in critical need of novel therapeutic approaches, which are both safe and effective.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide a synopsis regarding the safety and benefits of established and emerging pharmacotherapies for PBC and present viewpoints on how they may evolve over the next several years.

EXPERT OPINION

It is our belief that the pharmacoscope of PBC, as with other cholestatic liver diseases, is likely to see important advancements in the near future.